Megyn and Emily Jashinsky React to Charlie Kirk Supporter Getting Screamed at By Protesters

Megyn Kelly Reacts to Karine Jean-Pierre Saying She Was Angry About Dem Party Abandoning Joe Biden

DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION—The plight of corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) jobs is only getting worse as the Trump administration’s crackdown takes hold, new employment research shows. As of September, job postings for diversity roles have plunged roughly 50% from pre-pandemic levels, falling to about 1,500 this year, according to Revelio Labs data reported by Bloomberg. By comparison, DEI-related postings nearly quadrupled in 2022, reaching approximately 10,000. When President Donald Trump took office in January, DEI job postings were about 6% above 2019 levels, according to the outlet. Since taking office, Trump has led a major effort to eliminate identity-based considerations in employment. He signed an executive order in January directing all federal agencies to “enforce our long-standing civil-rights laws and to combat illegal private-sector DEI preferences, mandates, policies, programs, and activities.” The Federal Communications Commission has also leveraged merger-approval processes to pressure companies to terminate discriminatory DEI policies. Financial regulators have also scaled back or canceled exams on environmental, social, and governance issues emphasized during the Biden administration, which critics say were used to push liberal priorities on private companies. In recent months, corporate giants such as T-Mobile, Paramount, Amazon, and Walmart have eliminated or cut back DEI policies and departments, aligning with the broader political and regulatory shifts. Not only are DEI roles disappearing, but individuals with DEI-related experience are increasingly viewed as a liability, prompting many job seekers to remove the DEI label from résumés or reconsider their career paths, according to Bloomberg. Some 38% of DEI employees leaving their roles moved into positions within the same company that were not DEI-focused, 55% transitioned to non-DEI roles at new organizations, and a small minority secured new DEI positions elsewhere, according to Revelio Labs. Still, concerns remain that DEI roles may simply be transferred to other corporate departments, such as human resources. Among former DEI professionals, 16% have moved into HR operations, 7.9% into education program coordinator roles, 7.1% into public affairs officer positions, and 7% into academic research, Revelio Labs found. “While the number of dedicated DEI roles is shrinking, the expertise developed in these positions is not being lost. Instead, it is being redirected into other parts of the organization, suggesting that while the DEI label may be fading, the underlying work of building equitable and inclusive environments continues to find new avenues to persist,” Revelio Labs wrote in its September report. Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation The post Trump’s War on ‘Illegal DEI’ Leaves Diversity Industry in Ruins, Study Shows appeared first on The Daily Signal.

1916 Harley-Davidson 8-Valve Board Track Racer – Lot N360 Mecum’s annual motorcycle auction returns to the South Point Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas on Jan. 28-31, 2026. Many highly desirable motorcycles are already listed on Mecum’s website, and new lots and collections are being added daily.  Register to bid at the Mecum Las Vegas Motorcycles 2026 auction 1916 Harley-Davidson 8-Valve Twin Board Track Racer – Lot R706 Antique motorcycles often fetch the highest prices, such as the 1915 Cyclone V-Twin that sold for a record-breaking $1.32 million at the 2025 Mecum auction. Among the featured lots for the 2026 auction is a 1916 Harley-Davidson 8-Valve Board Track Racer (lot N360), which will cross the block on Jan. 30. How that bike fares will likely influence the auction price for another 1916 Harley-Davidson 8-Valve Board Track Racer (lot R706), which was recently restored and rebuilt to period-correct racing trim and will be auctioned on Jan. 31. There’s also a 1922 Harley 8-Valve Board Track Racer (lot N361) up for auction on Jan. 30.  1965 Harley-Davidson FL Chopper Hardtail – Lot N253 Beyond antiques, a wide array of other Harleys will be available in Las Vegas, including a 1966 M50 (lot W96), a 1970 Baja 100 (lot N114), a 1965 FL Chopper Hardtail (lot N253), a 1992 FXRT that was once Sonny Barger’s personal bike (lot R702), and a 2009 FLHTP Police Electra Glide With Sidecar and Ice-Chest Trailer (lot R464).  1992 Harley-Davidson FXRT – Lot R702 There are plenty of Indians up for auction too, including a 1912 Hedstrom 8-Valve Board Track Racer (lot N358), a 1939 Four (lot N401), a 1951 Chief (lot N262), and a 2017 Scout FTR750 Flat Track Racer (lot N409).  1912 Indian Hedstrom 8-Valve Board Track Racer – Lot N358 To see the full listing of motorcycles up for auction in January, go to the Mecum website, click on the Buy tab, and select Motorcycles. You can also register to bid at the auction, either in-person, online, or by phone.  2017 Indian Scout FTR750 Flat-Track Racer –Lot N409 1951 Indian Chief – Lot N262 1942 Harley-Davidson WLD Sport Solo – Lot R726 1939 Indian Four – Lot 401 The post 2026 Mecum Auction Preview: American Motorcycles appeared first on Rider Magazine.

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a case to determine the constitutionality of a federal law prohibiting anyone “who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” from possessing a firearm. The high court “granted review in United States v. Hemani, involving the federal government’s efforts to prosecute a Texas man for violating a federal statute that prohibits gun possession by users of illegal drugs,” SCOTUSblog stated. The Justice Department appealed a lower court’s ruling that past drug use alone cannot prohibit an individual from possessing a firearm under the Second Amendment. LEGAL ALERT: The Supreme Court has granted the cert petition in United States v. Hemani, which challenges 922(g)(3) (the federal drug user gun ban) https://t.co/PxDqn6hkyq pic.twitter.com/ott8sgUrnA — Firearms Policy Coalition (@gunpolicy) October 20, 2025 SCOTUSblog has more: The dispute began after FBI agents searched the home of Ali Danial Hemani. They found a Glock 9 mm pistol, 60 grams of marijuana, and 4.7 grams of cocaine, which led prosecutors to charge him with violating the law now at the center of the case. Hemani asked the district court to dismiss the charge, arguing that applying the law to him violated the Constitution. U.S. District Judge Amos Mazzant granted Hemani’s request, with the government’s agreement. He relied on a 2023 decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit invalidating a conviction under the same law when “the jury did not necessarily find that” the defendant in that case “was presently or even recently engaged in unlawful drug use.” The 5th Circuit upheld Mazzant’s decision. The government came to the Supreme Court in June, asking the justices to take up the case. U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer acknowledged that “[t]he Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right that is essential to ordered liberty,” and that “[u]njustifiable restrictions on that right present a grave threat to Americans’ most cherished freedoms.” But, Sauer continued, the federal law at the center of the case is one of the “narrow circumstances in which the government may justifiably burden that right.” First, he contended, because the law bars only habitual drug users from having a gun, it “imposes a limited, inherently temporary restriction—one which the individual can remove at any time simply by ceasing his unlawful drug use.” Second, he wrote, the law “stands solidly within our Nation’s history and tradition of regulation” of firearms, a key inquiry in determining whether gun restrictions are constitutional. Sauer characterized the law as “a modest, modern analogue” of early American restrictions on the possession of guns by “habitual drunkards.” Third, he added, “habitual illegal drug users with firearms present unique dangers to society—especially because they pose a grave risk of armed, hostile encounters with police officers while impaired.” Supreme Court Will Consider Overturning Federal Ban On Drug Users Owning Gunshttps://t.co/ax7odHUTal pic.twitter.com/D4OcnV3253 — Forbes (@Forbes) October 20, 2025 USA TODAY noted that Hunter Biden was convicted in 2024 of violating the law by “purchasing a gun despite having a known drug addiction.” Hunter Biden received a preemptive pardon from Joe Biden. Hunter Biden guilty of felony gun charges, faces 25 years in prison https://t.co/6iKyrkdofz pic.twitter.com/5E9doxtUF5 — New York Post (@nypost) June 11, 2024 USA TODAY shared further info: The DOJ’s defense of the law is particularly notable as the Trump administration has sided with gun rights advocates in other cases. That includes backing a challenge to Hawaii’s strict rules about where people can have guns, which the Supreme Court agreed to hear this term. But the department asked the high court to reverse multiple lower court rulings about pot smokers and guns. The government most wanted the justices to take a case involving a dual citizen of the United States and Pakistan who was charged with unlawfully owning a Glock pistol because he regularly smoked marijuana. The FBI had been monitoring Ali Danial Hemani because of his alleged connection to Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, which the government has designated a global terrorist group, according to filings. The government also alleges Hemani used and sold promethazine, an antihistamine used to treat allergies and motion sickness that can boost an opioid high, and used cocaine, although he was prosecuted based on his marijuana use. Hemani’s attorneys said the government is trying to “inflame and disparage” Hemani’s character, and the only facts that matter are that he was not high when the FBI found the Glock 19 in his Lewisville, Texas, home. Hemani was charged with violating the federal law that prohibits the possession of firearms by a person who “is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance.”

Yep — she’s back.  And not only is she hinting at another run for the presidency. She is apparently “the most qualified candidate ever to run for President” of the United States. That’s according to ‘some people’, which in turn is according to Kamala herself. She made that wild claim during an interview last week during a live event, touting all her illustrious achievements. The backdrop of the event was her book, aptly named in honor of the 107 Days she now laments for her personal struggle… You know — the one she heroically waged for the good of the American people — yet hopelessly — against the monolithic tyrant of Donald J. Trump. (It feels ridiculous even typing in such an exaggerated style, but please know how incredibly SARCASTIC I’m being!) That really is the name of her book, and it really is named in self-pitying fashion in an attempt to draw external pity from the rest of us for how unfairly she was treated. Crowned queen of the ‘No Kings’ party without even a vote to her name! For shame!  How dare we!  (And by ‘we’… I mean the proverbial ‘we’ — I don’t mean to implicate either you or me in the UNdemocratic crowning of Kamala Harris by the Democratic elites at running that party.) In true Kamala Harris fashion, she feigned humility while whipping herself up as the best thing since white bread — er, I mean SLICED bread. Sorry, just an empathetic Freudian slip, I’m sure. Here’s the viral audacious statement that’s catching the unfairly treated (but much-qualified) Kamala so much heat in the realm of the Internets: Kamala Harris: “Some people have actually said I was the most qualified candidate ever to run for president.” HAHAHAHAHApic.twitter.com/Wo7BY8mkOE — Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) October 15, 2025 And here’s the full screen version of that clip. Because as much as it may HURT to watch it — you just have to: Kamala: “Some people have said I was the most qualified candidate ever to run for president.” pic.twitter.com/c8jkdtiLpM — Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) October 15, 2025 I have to point out that the interviewer is a twice lesbian-married leftist with no love lost on President Trump. Which is one reason she can hardly bring herself NOT to fawn over Kamala’s royal glory during the interview. But I have no doubt the interview could have been conducted jointly by George Washington, Jefferson, and Madison… And Kamala still would have called upon her own apparent grandeur in their midst. The really crazy thing is there are recent polling numbers that she she is, in fact, STILL the darling of the Democrats! As I said, she hinted that a repeat run for the presidency might be in the cards, according to this coverage from Fox News: Former Vice President Kamala Harris hinted at a possible presidential run in 2028 and claimed that some people said she was “the most qualified candidate ever to run for president” during an on-stage interview with journalist Kara Swisher. When asked by Swisher last week whether she would be running for president in 2028, Harris shrugged and responded, “Maybe. Maybe not,” which prompted cheers from the crowd. Harris has already bypassed a run for California governor in 2026. Harris said she “couldn’t do enough” in the relatively short time she had on the campaign trail. The former vice president stressed that she wanted voters to not only know her background of who she is as a person, but also her professional qualifications. Harris reeled off her former titles, including serving as a U.S. Senator from California, the state’s attorney general, and the district attorney of San Francisco. “Well, some people have actually said I was the most qualified candidate ever to run for president,” Harris claimed to applause, adding that she’s “just speaking fact.” (Emphasis added.) Nevertheless, the roasting commenced immediately following her prideful proclamation… regardless of those polling numbers currently stroking her ego. And the viral clip showcasing Kamala’s ability to shamelessly hold herself up as the crème de la crème of American statesmanship is STILL going viral — millions of views later. One X user commented with a 007 meme: pic.twitter.com/e6AxXxOKx4 — PICE (@attackdogX) October 15, 2025 Another drew attention to her general approval of HERSELF. With her historically mishandled campaign funds as fodder: Really @KamalaHarris?!… pic.twitter.com/TsgJ63Kfd7 — TheRealFact (@TheRealFact8) October 15, 2025 And I have more roasting yet to share! But as I mentioned, there are actually current stats showing she MIGHT still actually be the favored Dem candidate! Check out these polling numbers reported just a few hours ago from a pool of registered voters identifying as Democrats. This coverage of the recent poll comes from the Indiana-based daily newspaper, the “News Sun”: Former vice president and 2024 presidential candidate Kamala Harris leads Democratic contenders for 2028, according to a new poll. The Center Square Voters’ Voice Poll, conducted by Noble Predictive Insights, surveyed 2,565 registered voters from Oct. 2-6, 2025, via opt-in online panel and text-to-web cell phone messages. Only those who identified as Democrat (948 of those surveyed) or Independent (199) were asked to choose who to among top Democratic contenders. Of the eight Democratic names listed in the poll, Harris had the support of 33% of Democrats and 27% of Independents surveyed. California Gov. Gavin Newsom trailed with 13% support among Democrats and 3% among Independents. Seventeen percent of those surveyed indicated they weren’t sure who they’d pick if a Democratic primary were held that day. New York U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez placed a distant third, netting 8% of both Democratic and Independent support, and former U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg followed with 7% among both groups. Harris cleanly swept nearly all demographic groups surveyed, polling strongest among Black, Southern and young voters. She captured 54% of Black support, 40% support of those who live in the South, 44% of those ages 18 to 29, and 42% of those ages 30 to 44. She was also twice as popular as Newsom with women and people with a household income under $50,000 (36% to his 18%). (Emphasis added.) Numbers like THAT among Democrats make me want to remind them of videos like THIS: bruh just watch this pic.twitter.com/UEyWLzOKHb — Dimitrios Paolo (@dimitriospaolo) October 15, 2025 It should not be possible for someone who is responsible for so much bad… To stand before Democrats and CONSISTENTLY CLAIM that all those failures are the fault of someone else; namely President Trump… And STILL turn up as the darling favorite for the masses! I need for people to continue waking up.  Apparently… we’re not fully there yet. At least I can count on Joe Rogan, who IS on a path to ‘waking up’ politically and spiritually, to LAUGH at Kamala’s inherent ridiculousness: Joe Rogan makes fun of Kamala Harris. This video is funny. pic.twitter.com/GwBZYlJVdH — (Jason) American Patriot (@TruthJasonLee) October 18, 2025 And one registered Democrat has given me hope for the rest of them. This guy saw her book as the handwriting on the wall… and put out this video: “After seeing the behavior of Kamala Harris and her recent book that’s come out, I regret ever voting for her.. I should have voted for Trump.” “I will never vote for a Democrat president again.” “Does this mean I would vote for JD Vance? You damn right I will.” Love it!! pic.twitter.com/BhkSAIAgTl — TONY (@TONYxTWO) September 26, 2025 People like that restore my hope for humanity on a daily basis. As does Rep. Bryon Donalds… backed by President Trump to become the next Governor of Florida. Check out his post, detailing the true ‘qualifications’ of Kamala Harris: Thank God Kamala lost. UNDER BIDEN-HARRIS: Democrats, bureaucrats, & teachers unions.. Sent FBI after parentsLocked kids out of schoolForced boys into girls sportsPromoted radical gender ideology & CRT UNDER TRUMP: We are securing parental rights across the nation. pic.twitter.com/rfyiXDGnkn — Byron Donalds (@ByronDonalds) October 19, 2025 As Donalds said — THANK GOD Kamala Harris lost! She made a second book-promoting appearance a few days ago and gave another glimpse of just how unhinged she really is. And how made she is about being crowned queen by the Democratic Party, only to have that crown smashed to pieces by President Trump. This person COULD BE sitting in the Oval Office, if 33% of voting Democrats and 27% of Independents have their say: Kamala Harris just had a total meltdown on stage pic.twitter.com/EIFQbKl9bl — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) October 19, 2025 President Trump chimed in to this conversation and highlighted one of Kamala’s unique ‘qualifications’ yesterday, as luck would have it. It may have been a team effort including Gavin Newsom and Pelosi who claim the same hometown as Kamala Harris. But apparently Kamala’s qualifications helped QUALIFY San Francisco to be the next target for President Trump’s systematic clean-up of American cities: “We’re going to San Francisco… truly one of the great cities of the world — and then, 15 years ago, it went wrong. It went woke,” says @POTUS. “We’re going to go to San Francisco and we’re going to make it great.” pic.twitter.com/4Tly3pQ3Td — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) October 19, 2025 I guess, indirectly, we could credit Kamala’s qualifications for leading to some of President Trump’s wins? But that’s sort of like destroying jobs… only to claim you had a great impact on the job market when a few of them come back. Oh, wait — she did that, too… didn’t she. I also have to ask who the ‘some people’ are that allegedly told her how great she was? Two X users made some pretty good guesses as to their identities: “Some people” pic.twitter.com/y2aVoFaRtd — HunnyB (@HunnyBplus3) October 15, 2025 I’d say that’s a fair assumption to make. But also… “some people” pic.twitter.com/tDmHVixD2h — TazTears (@TazTears) October 15, 2025 “The most qualified candidate to ever run for President” has got to be the most arrogant fabrication of all the untruths that Kamala Harris has ever uttered. Let’s just hope — and pray FERVENTLY — that she never gets a chance to PROVE AGAIN how wrong she is with that statement.

The Charlie Kirk assassination case continues to get more and more fishy by the day… Judge Tony Graf, who is presiding over alleged assassin Tyler Robinson’s trial, has quietly issued a very broad gag order affecting thousands of people. The judge’s gag order bars anyone associated with the case — including over 3,000 witnesses who were present on the Utah Valley University campus when Charlie Kirk was killed — from openly and publicly speaking about it. : The SCOPE OF the Tyler Robinson case GAG ORDER is UNPRECEDENTED in Utah. Over 3,000 witnesses, “associates” of the case, attorneys, family members, & even press are subject to the order, threatened with potential “Contempt of Court” charges & jail time for speaking. pic.twitter.com/P43MJiL1Fp — Diligent Denizen (@DiligentDenizen) October 19, 2025 The gag order was issued during Tyler Robinson’s hearing at the end of September. According to the judge, his reasoning was to “prevent problems associated with pre-trial publicity.” Fox 13 reported on the details: Prosecutors also discussed a gag order that 4th District Court Judge Tony Graf had entered in the case, which could create problems. It forbids anyone associated with the case from speaking to news media. “There are a number of witnesses that have yet to be identified that will likely be used in the state’s case. This occurred in front of two or three thousand students at Utah Valley University so we’re in the process of identifying those witnesses, so those witnesses are presently unknown right now,” Grunander said. Judge Graf said the gag order was designed to prevent problems associated with pre-trial publicity. “The Court will rule that as those witnesses become known to each side that that information is conveyed to abide by this order. Obviously, there are potentially many witnesses and it’s not the expectation that you would do that upfront but as they become known,” he said. In other words, the gag order effectively silences anyone and everyone who may have seen something on that fateful day. I’m not buying the ‘wanting to avoid pre-trial publicity’ excuse. It sounds to me a whole lot like they’re trying to keep something from getting out… Others folks on X agree that it seems very suspicious: Why the secrecy and a gag order of 3000 people? Is that even legal if you’re merely a witness? What are they afraid of? So many questions with 0⃣ answers….. — Victoria Windland Taraska (Vicki) (@TaraskaWindland) October 19, 2025 Let me get this right? Take this suspect and shut up? Is that about right? — Resist the NWO (@Merica_81) October 20, 2025 To add to the weirdness of it all, FBI Director Kash Patel recently said he won’t release any new footage or evidence in the case: I get wanting 100% proof that Tyler Robinson was the shooter. But a gag order now bars prosecutors, FBI & witnesses from speaking out. Patel won’t release new footage to avoid tipping off the defense, triggering a mistrial, or risking case dismissal. pic.twitter.com/uyy3j6yGlw — Make America Logical Again (@bringbacklogic_) October 18, 2025 Very strange. I’m not saying Tyler Robinson is innocent, by any means. But, it’s obvious that tons of details in the official FBI narrative of the shooter don’t add up. And yet, Patel says that’s it? Case closed? Then, it’s topped off with a giant gag order to prevent anyone who was there from saying otherwise. Putting a gag order on this case just makes it obvious that they’re hiding something. Then Kash comes out and says they’re no longer pursuing the truth and have officially closed the case. Sounds eerily like the JFK case. — Punz (@Punz33onX) October 20, 2025 This all begs the question: why is everything so locked up tight? What are they so afraid of coming to light? Then, you have Candace Owens, who is vowing to violate the gag order on all the witnesses’ behalf: Don’t worry about the gag order in the Charlie Kirk case. I plan to violate it on the world’s behalf. The things I’ve discovered this past week are enough to burn the house down. Yes, Charlie was betrayed. By everyone. — Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) October 20, 2025 Time will tell if she has the receipts to back up that dramatic statement… Let’s hope that one way or another, the truth gets out, whatever that may be. Charlie deserves it. What are your thoughts on all this?

The parents of this baby needs to be locked up ASAP! A baby was found on a train platform in Manhattan on Monday. Under New York’s Abandoned Infant Protection Act,  a parent can abandon “a newborn baby up to 30 days of age anonymously and without fear of prosecution — if the baby is abandoned in a safe manner.” However, under this case the parent did not abandon the baby in a safe place. Story here https://t.co/12Ud1NT30V | The baby girl, described as a newborn, was found wrapped in a blanket on the staircase leading to the southbound 1/2/3 train platform. pic.twitter.com/PjZ4YIXs4f — Eyewitness News (@ABC7NY) October 20, 2025 NBC New York provided the following details into baby being found: A baby girl was found alone, abandoned on a train platform in the middle of Manhattan on Monday morning. Police said the baby was discovered before 10 a.m. on the southbound platform of the 34th Street-Penn Station stop of the 1/2/3 line. The baby was conscious and alert, police said, but was taken to Bellevue Hospital to be evaluated. There were no service delays reported at the station around the time of the incident. The police investigation is ongoing. The state of New York has a safe haven law, or the Abandoned Infant Protection Act, where are a parent can abandon “a newborn baby up to 30 days of age anonymously and without fear of prosecution — if the baby is abandoned in a safe manner.” In the case of the law, the parent must abandon the baby in a safe location, such as a hospital, staffed police station or staffed fire station, provided they also notify an “appropriate person,” according to the Office of Children and Family Services. More information on New York’s Abandoned Infant Protection Act is available by calling 1-866-505-SAFE (7233). Abandon babies are not just being found in blue states. The New York Post reported two babies were found in a ditch in Indiana: An Indianapolis man who went out to pick up some packages stumbled across two baby girls abandoned in a ditch in below-freezing temperatures after their family car was stolen, police said. Robert Deane had gone out of his house to check if his mail arrived Monday morning when he spotted two car seats tossed in a local ditch, with two infants, 4- and 5-month-olds, crying for help. “One of them was screaming, so I immediately grabbed the car seats, brought them inside,” he told local CBS 4. “We got them warmed up and called 911.” A Good Samaritan stumbled across two crying infants abandoned in a ditch in Indianapolis. Police said the babies were kidnapped when someone stole the care they were in Monday morning. Just before Deane made his call, Indianapolis Metropolitan Police (IMPD) were called about four miles away to East Gimber Street about a stolen 2013 Hyundai Sonata where the girls, a pair of cousins, were sitting in the back seat. Police said they had just begun searching for the car and babies when they received Deane’s call about their whereabouts. Man finds 2 babies abandoned in ditch in freezing weather while checking for mail https://t.co/oJsEKGPG7M pic.twitter.com/2jcVmtjq4K — New York Post (@nypost) December 3, 2024

Democrats just got some terrible news. Now 20 days in, the Schumer shutdown is backfiring tremendously and hasn’t harmed President Trump one bit. In fact, President Trump’s approval rating has gone up during the government shutdown, as Democrats continue to vote to keep it closed. Watch CNN’s Chief Data Analyst Harry Enten deliver the bad news for Democrats here: LOVE TO SEE IT: CNN is reporting that President Trump’s approval rating has INCREASED during the Government shutdown. Schumer’s Shutdown is BACKFIRING hugely!pic.twitter.com/bDKEKrrfCf — The Patriot Oasis (@ThePatriotOasis) October 20, 2025 The new poll from CNN reveals something very enlightening. The American people, by and large, have woken up and are no longer fooled by the Democrats’ schemes and tactics. We’ve seen it all before, and their tired playbook of creating problems and pinning the blame on President Trump no longer works. Mediaite noted: During Trump’s last shutdown, 61 percent of Americans said they blamed him “a great deal.” This time round, that number has dropped to 48 percent — a 13-point decline that may explain why Trump appears unfazed by the political standoff. “It’s a different world,” Enten said, pointing to the shifting blame dynamics. “It’s no real wonder that Donald Trump at this point, looking at the shutdown, says: ‘You know what, it’s not actually harming me politically, in large part because he’s getting less of the blame.’” The findings hint at a transformed political landscape, one in which Trump’s base remains unshaken and the broader electorate is more divided on who bears responsibility for the shutdown. Chuck Schumer really thought that making outlandish demands that the American people don’t want in the first place to keep the government shutdown would give President Trump a bad look. Talk about an egregious mistake! President Trump has only benefited from this mess, as Americans lose even more trust in the Democrat party. So, what do you say, Dems? Time to cave yet?