Sh*t, the police… Cool cop @shortrideraz2020

Holy crap! It appears as though an an Iranian news media station was bombed on a LIVE broadcast. Watch as this angry Muslim woman yells into the camera before suddenly getting bombed live on the air: Iranian media station appears to get bombed while LIVE pic.twitter.com/JTDLqZgt8m — Meet Kevin (@realMeetKevin) June 16, 2025 Wow! Backup here if needed: #BREAKING THE IRANIAN STATE TV NEWS HAS JUST BEEN BOMBED LIVE ON AIR pic.twitter.com/gL2hXYEiFi — SANTINO (@MichaelSCollura) June 16, 2025 Of course the MSM is running cover for Iran claiming “No, they didn’t get bombed….it was just debris falling!” LOL! This is why the “MSM” is failing….garbage headlines like this. And this is why we’re growing, now over 5+ million monthly readers. Because we tell you the truth, with no censorship or spin.  We just give it to you straight.

In a truly horrific scene, a man today barged into a NYC courthouse and immediately attacked two officers, slashing two in the neck and face. Maniac barges into NYC courthouse and slashes officers in the neck, face in chaotic scene https://t.co/IdSplZoXij pic.twitter.com/6E98Ed09Gy — New York Post (@nypost) June 16, 2025 Here’s a quick summary of what we know so far: Jonathan Wohl, 37, of Queens, stabbed two court officers at Manhattan Criminal Court on Monday morning around 9:30 AM. He slashed one officer in the neck and another in the face, and shoved a third officer into a barrier. Wohl was not scheduled for any court appearance that day, making the attack appear premeditated and targeted. Surveillance footage shows Wohl calmly approaching the metal detectors before suddenly attacking. Court officers quickly tackled, disarmed, and arrested him near the magnetometers. Wohl has 18 prior arrests and is currently facing three open criminal cases. He has a history of harassing courthouse staff and causing disturbances, raising red flags about lax security. The injured officers were hospitalized and are in stable condition. Officials are treating this as a deliberate, targeted assault on uniformed court security. Security protocols are under review as authorities investigate Wohl’s motives and how he was able to carry out the attack. In researching for this story, I notice almost NO “mainstream media” is covering this at all. Radio silence. Is that because of the suspected attackers race and likely religion? Or are they all just too busy to get around to this story? NEW: Knife-wielding New York man slashes two officers in a Manhattan courthouse, hits one in the neck and the other in the face in footage obtained by the New York Post. The suspect has been identified as 37-year-old Jonathan Wohl. To no one’s surprise, Wohl has 18 prior… pic.twitter.com/y7YtKOJFgI — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) June 16, 2025 The only “MSM” source I could find covering this is the NY Post, which reports the following: A maniac barged into a Lower Manhattan courthouse and slashed two officers in the neck and face in a shocking, apparently “targeted” attack Monday morning, law enforcement officials and sources said. Jonathan Wohl, 37, of Queens, ran into the lobby of Manhattan Criminal Court at 100 Centre Street around 9:30 a.m. and suddenly ambushed the officers with a knife, the sources said. He cut one of the officers twice on his face and sliced the other on the neck – before shoving a third into a barrier in the main lobby on the south side of the building, according to the sources and the Office of Court Administration. “The assaults, captured on surveillance video, appeared preliminarily to be a targeted attack of the uniformed officers working security details at the courthouse,” an OCA spokesman said in a statement. A group of officers could be seen taking him down to the ground and then carrying him out of the courthouse with his feet up in the air. “Several Court Officers immediately rushed to stop the assailant, subduing him near a bank of magnetometers, disarming him, and taking him into custody,” the spokesman said. Charges are pending against the alleged attacker.

There is a lot of information flying fast today about the charges being brought against alleged Minnesota shooter Vance Boelter. And a lot of confusion, so allow me to quickly sort it all out for you and bring you up to speed. First, let’s start with this quick summary and then I’ll dive in and explain deeper, but start here: Suspect Identified: Vance Luther Boelter, 57, is accused of a series of politically motivated shootings targeting Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses. Fatalities and Injuries: Former MN House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark were killed. State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife Yvette were seriously injured — Hoffman was shot 9 times, Yvette 8 times. Federal & State Charges: Boelter faces: Federal: 2 counts of stalking, 2 counts of murder, 2 firearm-related charges. State (Hennepin County): 2 counts second-degree murder, 2 attempted murder charges. First-degree murder charges are pending. Attack Details: Boelter impersonated a police officer using a uniform, body armor, and a hyperrealistic silicon mask. He knocked on lawmakers’ doors claiming to be police before opening fire. Surveillance footage at multiple locations captured his actions. Weapons & Planning: Inside his SUV: multiple loaded assault-style rifles, a 9mm handgun, and a list of public officials’ names and addresses. Authorities say Boelter’s attacks were “carefully planned” and described them as “chilling.” Arrest: Captured Sunday night in Sibley County after a resident’s friend noticed suspicious activity. Bail set at $5 million. Other Targets: Boelter also approached homes of at least two other state lawmakers that night but did not succeed in confronting them. Federal Involvement & Legal Implications: Because Minnesota abolished the death penalty, only federal charges could open the possibility of capital punishment. Federal prosecution ensures more resources and broader jurisdiction. Ok, the first thing you might notice is the State charges seem a bit weak. Second-degree murder only? Not premeditated First-degree murder? Are you kidding me? There’s actually a good explanation and credit to my friend Shawn Farash for posting it: I see a lot of “why are the charges so weak, why not pre-meditated, why not first degree murder?” Here’s your answer: You need a grand jury to charge someone with premeditated murder because it falls under first degree murder in Minnesota, which requires a grand jury… pic.twitter.com/7YUIJW8TYP — Shawn Farash (@Shawn_Farash) June 16, 2025 I see a lot of “why are the charges so weak, why not pre-meditated, why not first degree murder?” Here’s your answer: You need a grand jury to charge someone with premeditated murder because it falls under first degree murder in Minnesota, which requires a grand jury indictment… Vance Boelter’s charges aren’t a conspiracy but rather procedure. They’ll hold him on the “weaker” charges and then upgrade him when a grand jury returns the stronger charges. Grok confirms: Requirement of a Grand Jury for First-Degree Murder in Minnesota:Shawn Farash correctly notes that first-degree murder in Minnesota requires a grand jury indictment. This is supported by legal documentation, such as the information from Lundgren & Johnson, P.S.C., a Minnesota law firm, which states that first-degree murder is “only chargeable by grand jury.” Under Minnesota Statutes (e.g., Section 609.185), first-degree murder includes premeditated murder and carries a mandatory life sentence without parole. The grand jury process involves presenting evidence to a group of citizens to determine if there’s probable cause for such a severe charge, which can take time and explains why initial charges might be lower (e.g., second-degree murder). Initial Charges of Second-Degree Murder:The image attached to Farash’s post shows a complaint charging Vance Luther Boelter with two counts of second-degree murder with intent (not premeditated), each carrying a maximum sentence of 40 years. This aligns with Minnesota Statutes (Section 609.19), which defines second-degree murder as intentional but not necessarily premeditated killing. The “weaker” charges could indeed be a procedural step to secure Boelter’s detention while awaiting a grand jury’s decision on first-degree murder charges, as Farash suggests. Federal Charges and Escalation:Farash’s implication that charges might be upgraded is supported by recent developments. As reported by CNBC on June 16, 2025, federal prosecutors have already charged Boelter with six counts, including murder and firearms offenses, following the shootings of a state lawmaker, her husband, and injuries to another couple. This dual state-federal approach is common in high-profile cases to ensure accountability and address jurisdictional nuances, reinforcing Farash’s point about holding Boelter while stronger charges are pursued. Public Perception and Procedure:The thread reflects public confusion and suspicion (e.g., comments about a potential cover-up or weak charges), which Farash addresses by clarifying it’s a standard legal process. This is consistent with how the justice system often operates—starting with charges that can be immediately filed to detain a suspect, then escalating via grand jury or federal action. The Feds are not bound by any such rules which is why you see the Federal charges much stronger: FBI charges against Vance Boelter pic.twitter.com/1iCOrKGo0W — Meet Kevin (@realMeetKevin) June 16, 2025 Count 1Stalking of Melissa Hortman – Use of Interstate Facilities Count 2Stalking of Mark Hoffman – Use of Interstate Facilities Count 3Murder of Melissa Hortman Through Use of a Firearm Count 4Murder of Mark Hortman Through Use of a Firearm Count 5Shooting of Melissa and Mark Hortman – Firearms Offense Count 6Shooting of John and Yvette Hoffman – Firearms Offense You can read the full Federal criminal charges here:  https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/06/complaint_redacted.pdf ABC News had more on Boelter’s first Court appearance today: Boelter, who is in federal custody, made a brief first appearance in federal court on Monday, wearing a two-piece orange jail suit, orange socks and black slides. Boelter said he has about $20,000 to $30,000 in his bank accounts and asked for a public defender. His combined preliminary and detention hearing was set for June 27. A motive is unclear, Thompson said. According to an interview with an unnamed witness, Boelter tried to buy an electronic bike and a Buick in north Minneapolis at 7 a.m. following the attacks, and allegedly drove with the witness to a bank where he withdrew $2,200 in cash, according to court documents. Hours after the shootings, Boelter allegedly texted his family, “Dad went to war last night … I don’t wanna say more because I don’t want to implicate anybody,” according to the affidavit. Boelter also allegedly texted his wife, “Words are not gonna explain how sorry I am for this situation … there’s gonna be some people coming to the house armed and trigger-happy and I don’t want you guys around.” In a search of Boelter’s wife’s car, law enforcement recovered two handguns, approximately $10,000 in cash and passports for Boelter’s wife and her children, the affidavit said.

Vance Boelter, the suspected killer in the recent “politically motivated” shootings targeting Minnesota lawmakers, is now in custody following a manhunt.