100percentfedup.com
Another State Introduces Legislation To Ban mRNA Jabs
Kentucky has become the ninth state with legislative efforts to ban the administration of mRNA shots.
State lawmakers filed legislation to prohibit the use of any gene therapy product for infectious diseases.
Kentucky joins MT and ID in calling for a stop to mRNA shots!@realTJRoberts and @tichenor4ky have filed HB469 to prohibit use of any gene therapy product for infectious diseases.
Thank you co-sponsors:@Miz_EmC @CallowayforKy @SteveDoanLaw @SavannahLMaddox @CandyMassaroni… pic.twitter.com/UVmQk3y50Y
— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) February 13, 2025
“Create a new section of KRS Chapter 214 to establish legislative intent; define terms; establish that a person in the Commonwealth shall not administer, by any route or modality, any human gene therapy product for any infectious disease indication, regardless of whether the administration is termed an immunization, vaccine, or any other term; exempt human gene therapy products used to treat cancer or genetic disorders; sunset the provisions on July 1, 2035, unless extended by the General Assembly; EMERGENCY,” Kentucky House Bill 469 reads.
According to McCullough Foundation Administrator Nicolas Hulscher, the following states have introduced legislation to ban mRNA injections:
Idaho
Montana
Washington
Iowa
Texas
Tennessee
South Carolina
Florida
Kentucky
NEW MAP – Kentucky Becomes the 9th U.S. State with Legislative Efforts to Ban mRNA Injections https://t.co/OIapOqd7ta pic.twitter.com/MoC5BUEBZt
— Nicolas Hulscher, MPH (@NicHulscher) February 13, 2025
“Just as we faced a major setback in Tennessee—where key Senate testimony for a proposed mRNA ban was abruptly canceled —the Kentucky House of Representatives has filed HB469 to prohibit mRNA injections for infectious disease indications Those that seek to stop these critical initiatives will NOT be successful,” McCullough Foundation wrote.
BREAKING – Kentucky Becomes the 9th U.S. State with Legislative Efforts to Ban mRNA Injections
Just as we faced a major setback in Tennessee—where key Senate testimony for a proposed mRNA ban was abruptly canceled —the Kentucky House of Representatives has filed HB469 to… https://t.co/Cq3uOFNmwX
— McCullough Foundation (@McCulloughFund) February 13, 2025
According to prior reports, legislation proposed in Montana would make it the first state to ban the use of mRNA vaccines.
Proposed Bill In State Legislature Would ‘Ban mRNA Vaccinations For Humans’ – Hearing Tomorrow
“To my knowledge, Montana is the first state to draft a bill banning mRNA. The first hearing is tomorrow. Support HB371!” Dr. Mary Talley Bowden previously said.
To my knowledge, Montana is the first state to draft a bill banning mRNA. The first hearing is tomorrow. Support HB371! pic.twitter.com/XqbVVy2wnK
— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) February 6, 2025
"HB371 has passed out of committee and will go to the Montana House for a vote. All 12 Republicans voted yes, all 8 Democrats voted no," Bowden said Wednesday.
Breaking: HB371 has passed out of committee and will go to the Montana House for a vote.
All 12 Republicans voted yes, all 8 Democrats voted no.@MTGOP https://t.co/aZn2lmuTfz
— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) February 12, 2025
Per NBC Montana:
House bill 371, sponsored by State Rep. Greg Kmetz (R-Miles City) and introduced alongside a dozen other Republicans, would ban the use of mRNA vaccinations on humans, and provide for misdemeanors to be issued to violators.
According to Johns Hopkins, gene-based vaccines include those to protect against Covid-19, and vaccine manufacturers are developing mRNA vaccines to protect against other respiratory viruses.
Friday’s hearing on the bill in House Judiciary lasted well over two hours, with proponents arguing these vaccines have caused short term side-effects and could have long-term impacts that are unknown, and that they could shed to others.
“Gene-based vaccines, or mRNA vaccines, are the most destructive and lethal medical products that have ever been used in human history. I am asking you to support this bill banning gene-based vaccines so we can halt continued harm, disability, and death of our citizens,” said Christine Drivdahl-Smith, a family physician in Miles City and volunteer board member of Montana Medical Freedom Alliance.
The other organizations voicing opposition was the Montana Family Foundation. A dozen other people spoke in their personal capacity against the bill, several of which work in the healthcare industry. This included pharmacists, nurses, and an obstetrician.
“mRNA vaccines are still in their infancy, we do not yet fully understand the long-term consequences of introducing synthetic genetic material into the human body,” said Derek Oestreicher, chief legal counsel for the Montana Family Foundation. “And the rush to roll out these vaccines without adequate long-term studies has left many individuals questioning the wisdom of their own medical choices. This is especially true for those who felt forced or coerced into taking the vaccines due to mandates, social pressures, or threats to their employment.”
Read Kentucky House Bill 469 HERE.