If you don’t remember “Car Talk‚” it was a radio show that lasted more than three decades on NPR‚ until it ended in 2012. The idea was that people called in with practical questions and dilemmas relating to their cars‚ and then the hosts dispensed advice — whether it was about car maintenance or repair or whatever. The show no longer exists‚ though‚ because the NPR that broadcast that show for 35 years no longer exists. The idea of a show that actually addresses people’s problems in real life‚ based on knowledge of how markets and automobiles or anything else actually works‚ has been unthinkable to the management of NPR for some time. Shows that cover the news from an objective factual perspective‚ to the extent possible‚ are also out of style. Instead‚ for the past decade‚ NPR has been controlled by activists who have devoted themselves to two primary pursuits.  The first pursuit is blanketing the airwaves with identity politics at every conceivable opportunity. That’s why they run segments on diverse gender representation in dinosaur emojis for example. The second pursuit has been shutting down stories that are inconvenient for the politicians who are voting to spend your money to finance NPR’s operation. Infamously‚ NPR’s executive editor‚ Terence Samuel‚ claimed that the Hunter Biden laptop scandal wasn’t a “real story.” He said it was a “distraction.” And instead of firing Samuel‚ NPR promoted him. American University even invited Samuel to deliver a lecture entitled‚ “How Journalism Can Save Itself and Democracy.” It’s harder to think of a better way to summarize what NPR has become. They aren’t simply bumbling propagandists. They’re also incredibly self-satisfied and narcissistic. They believe that they alone can save American democracy. And they think that‚ in order to do that‚ they need to control what kinds of information you can see. It’s not that they thought the Hunter Biden laptop story was “unvetted” or “Russian disinformation” or whatever the excuse was. They always knew it was factually accurate. But just because something is factually accurate‚ in NPR’s eyes‚ doesn’t make it true. According to NPR‚ truth is subjective; whatever’s most expedient politically for them is what’s true. For a long time now‚ this position — which really amounts to nihilism — was unstated at NPR‚ at least publicly. But now it’s explicit‚ thanks to a new CEO and president by the name of Katherine Maher who recently took over at NPR. Maher very clearly does not believe that the truth is objective. She also doesn’t believe it’s worth trying to find out what the truth may be. This is an extraordinary position for the chief executive of a publicly funded news organization to have‚ but it’s what Katherine Maher believes. This is a speech of hers that’s been making the rounds this week. It’s from back when she was running Wikimedia‚ which is mainly known for Wikipedia. Watch:   This is what passes for good public speaking these days. But she speaks in a robotic‚ sing-songy voice that makes it sound like she’s a kindergarten teacher lecturing a bunch of 5-year-olds. She has the tone of someone who believes firmly in the superiority of her own intellect‚ even though what she’s saying is so abjectly stupid. She says truth is subjective‚ and that everyone in the room has his or her own “truth.” But here’s the problem. Truth exists because reality exists. Either something is a part of reality or it isn’t. To deny objective truth is to deny reality. And you can’t even deny reality without asserting a reality — the reality that there is no reality. So the relativistic view is not only false‚ but so false as to be incomprehensible if you think about it for more than two seconds. Maher’s remarks are the same idiot relativism that you can hear from any freshman philosophy student‚ but she goes to great pains to make her take seem nuanced and innovative. She talks in circles and ends back at “there are many different truths.” She says this even after acknowledging that the truth exists. Again‚ those are two contradictory ideas‚ but that doesn’t bother Maher for a second. Like most of our overeducated elite class‚ she’s incapable of speaking without a parade of cliches while making tedious and absurd ideas sound far more complex than they really are.  WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show Also according to Maher‚ we have “glorious chronicles to the human experience in many different cultures” because we have “many different truths.” But that’s not what these “glorious chronicles” show us. Instead‚ they show us that the truth is objective and eternal. Different cultures and people across time have had different ways of perceiving the truth — talking about it‚ accessing it‚ embracing it‚ or rejecting it‚ yes. But the truth remains the same. That is what makes the study of history‚ and different cultures through history‚ so fascinating. It is precisely because all of these different people across time and space lived in the same reality‚ and yet had wildly different ways of existing in it‚ and responding to it.  Katherine Maher doesn’t seem to understand this‚ or at least she pretends not to. She repeats her theory of truth at every possible opportunity. Here’s some more footage from a conference two years ago. Maher begins by explaining that Galileo was prosecuted for saying that the Earth and planets revolve around the Sun‚ which is a basically accurate if wildly oversimplified retelling of that historical episode — although it doesn’t prove what Maher seems to think it does. Then she makes an incredible statement. Watch: “The truth‚ by definition‚ is malleable‚” says Maher. Really&;#63; By whose definition exactly&;#63; You can make the case that postmodernists thinkers and their precursors — like Machiavelli‚ Nietzsche‚ and Rousseau — might agree with that statement. But you won’t hear many traditional thinkers (prior to‚ say‚ Heidegger) saying that the truth is “malleable.” So why should we adopt the postmodern belief and not the traditional one&;#63; There has to be some reason to side with one school of thought and not another. In any event‚ if truth is merely “malleable” — if there’s no knowable‚ essential structure to it — then definitions themselves are just language games. There’s no significance to any of it. It’s just a power struggle. When you get down to it‚ that’s really what Maher is saying. She’s asserting that “the truth” is “malleable” as an act of political will because she doesn’t believe in any objectively true definitions. She keeps saying‚ over and over again‚ the words “the truth‚” only to make it clear that she has no idea what that is. And from that very shaky foundation‚ Maher starts to derive some very shaky corollaries. At one point‚ Maher implies that people don’t trust the media anymore not because the media lied to them‚ but because people have different mistaken “truths” that they’re clinging to. Watch: It’s another revealing statement that Maher makes without any justification. She’s implying that democracies aren’t (or can’t be) xenophobic or nationalist. But the Greeks were both. Greek democracies were very much “xenophobic” — if that’s how you want to put it — and nationalist in nature. There’s no doubt about that. So why is democracy the goal here&;#63; Is that even her goal&;#63; Really‚ her only given justification for thinking our traditional conception of truth is inadequate‚ and needs to be reworked‚ is that the “truth” we have now is the product of a history which is also political. “History is written by victors” is one of the many cliches she invokes throughout her speeches. And she says that excludes various potential sources of knowledge like “indigenous” perspectives and practices‚ or women with their “emotional intelligence.” But that’s not incompatible with the reality that “the truth” is real‚ is universal‚ and many aspects of it have been uniquely uncovered by Western thought‚ science‚ and technology. Even if you bought into Maher’s talking points about a “plurality of perspectives” being better than “one alone” for getting at “the truth‚” the fact remains that it took 2‚000 years of Western‚ Eurocentric‚ supposedly white supremacist‚ heteronormative‚ misogynist history for us to reach the point at which these minor tail-end improvements she’s suggesting could be made. It took 2‚000 years of history to create the civilization that Maher is now critiquing. And if she thinks this new approach will cause some kind of “scientific revolution‚” it won’t. The more likely outcome is that it will destroy the civilization that was built over thousands of years. That is the point after all. And this is the essence of what we call wokeness. The Left likes to put conservatives on the spot by demanding a definition of “woke.” Well‚ here it is — the rejection of truth as a category. That’s what wokeness is‚ when boiled down to its most fundamental parts. As for Maher‚ it’s tempting to dismiss all of this footage as the ramblings of a single woman who has no idea what she’s talking about. But it’s a bit more significant than that. Maher was selected to lead NPR‚ after an allegedly careful vetting process. There’s no way that NPR didn’t scrutinize her beliefs‚ which Maher has expressed many times over the last few years in public social media posts and numerous speeches. On Twitter‚ Chris Rufo has exposed some of the more deranged posts from this woman. There are really too many to mention‚ but suffice it to say‚ she’s like a woke AI bot that churns out the least original woke liberal woman talking points you can possibly imagine. She uses the word “folx‚” with the “x” at the end. She says “Latinx.” She called Donald Trump a racist and cried with joy when Biden took office‚ of course. She wrote that she once dreamed of going on a road trip with Kamala Harris eating “nuts and baklava.” She expresses her happiness when she logs into the public WiFi at a COVID clinic and the password is “HeSheThey‚” recognizing the lived experience of nonbinary patients. She calls the Internet “sexist.” At one point‚ she apologized for using the phrase “people who identify as women‚” because it’s a form of “trans-erasure.” She writes about the importance of “transit justice” and vegetarian Thanksgiving‚ and rants about the “male gaze” and “late-stage capitalism‚” even as she drew a salary of $800‚000 a year. There are many more examples; Chris Rufo’s feed has categorized many of them. To burnish her intellectual credentials even further‚ Maher even sat on a panel with Lizzo at a Ted conference where tickets cost more than $10‚000. The name of Lizzos’ talk was‚ “The Black history of twerking — and how it taught me self-love.”  But Maher doesn’t need lessons on self-love‚ she has that covered. What she’s looking for now is power. In a video posted by the Atlantic Council and unearthed by Rufo‚ Maher explains that the First Amendment — which you’d think journalists would support‚ since it’s the one thing keeping journalists out of prison — is not a sacred constitutional principle. Instead‚ she says‚ it’s a “challenge” to be overcome. Watch: The only people who view the First Amendment as a “challenge” are government censors who want to shut down any dissent by force. And now that she’s running a state-funded media outlet‚ that’s exactly what Maher is. She’s a state-funded censor. To that end‚ she no longer believes in transparency. The irony is that‚ when she was running Wikimedia‚ Maher kept talking about the importance of showing people everything that’s going on inside the company. Every edit on Wikipedia‚ she said‚ is public for a reason. Disclosure is sometimes “painful‚” she said‚ but it’s necessary.  Transparency is key‚ she said at the time. But apparently this is one of the malleable “truths” that Katherine Maher has decided to discard. As you’ve probably heard‚ she just forced out an NPR whistleblower who wrote a damning column in the Free Press about the organization’s corruption and overwhelming bias. She suspended this 25-year veteran of NPR without pay because he pointed out that the organization is now completely one-sided. For example‚ the whistleblower wrote: Concerned by the lack of viewpoint diversity‚ I looked at voter registration for our newsroom. In D.C.‚ where NPR is headquartered and many of us live‚ I found 87 registered Democrats working in editorial positions and zero Republicans. None. That’s not the kind of transparency that the new NPR CEO appreciates‚ apparently. She’s happy to talk about how NPR employs too many white men. But she definitely doesn’t want to talk about political bias‚ or how useless NPR has become. It used to be that NPR at least pretended to be embarrassed about this. In 2011‚ NPR’s CEO at the time‚ Vivian Schiller‚ resigned after a Project Veritas sting exposed what she thought about conservatives in the Tea Party movement. To summarize: she didn’t like them. Schiller had to resign once her views came to light. Back then‚ NPR believed that the appearance of fairness was at least a little important. But that was the “Car Talk” era of NPR. Now they believe their CEO can categorically reject the idea that there’s any truth to report on. This is a belief system that’s now in vogue in newsrooms all over the country. It’s a big reason for the rise of transgenderism‚ COVID hysteria‚ and all the media’s lying we had to endure under the previous administration. This is the belief system that insists that men can become women‚ because the meaning of the words “men” and “women” are subjective. And it will spell the end of Western civilization unless we reject it. That is‚ of course‚ the point of everything Katherine Maher is saying. In the absence of truth‚ there is only a struggle for power. And right now — and hopefully not for much longer — it’s people like Katherine Maher who have that power.

Being Speaker of the House with an extraordinarily slim majority is a really tough job. You have to cut deals because you have no other capacity to get anything done. That’s because given the fact there is a one-vote “motion to vacate” rule that is in place in the House of Representatives‚ any one member of the Republican caucus can challenge the job of the Speaker of the House at any given time. It also means if a bunch of headline-grabbing people in the Republican caucus are more interested in being on television than in actually governing‚ maintaining a majority‚ or growing that majority to get big things done‚ that can hold up the works. All this is coming to a head because House Speaker Mike Johnson has now put forward a series of bills related to foreign aid.  Foreign aid is not the United States being wildly charitable. It is not the United States randomly deciding to drop goody bags in poor parts of the world. It does not involve simply sending food to Somalia or something of that nature. When it comes to foreign aid‚ there are always strings attached. That’s what makes it in America’s interest. It’s the same way as attempting to sponsor a friend in order to accomplish a particular goal; you might lend or give that friend money to get back on their feet in order to make sure that person remains a friend or that an ally is able to be strong. That is what American foreign aid does‚ and this has historically been the role of American foreign aid. In the aftermath of World War II‚ the United States effectively single-handedly rebuilt Europe with the Marshall Plan. WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show A lot of people on the Republican side of the aisle have said that all foreign aid is somehow bad‚ terrible‚ useless‚ or‚ worse than useless‚ that it’s counterproductive because we’re not spending it at home; thus‚ we shouldn’t be spending it at all. Such an argument is insanely shortsighted because there are two ways we spend our defense money. One: actual defense‚ meaning‚ for example‚ creating F-35s‚ F-22s‚ aircraft carriers‚ and submarines. Two: providing for our national defense by strengthening our allies. When our allies are not strong‚ we have to step in and take the lead. It turns out that stepping in is a lot more expensive. Allies who are unable to defend themselves lead to enemies who are able to take advantage of that‚ thus threatening American interests and forcing American involvement. This has happened over and over in American history. When our allies are not strong enough‚ the United States ends up taking a lead role in areas we have no interest in being. Foreign aid represents well under 1% of the federal budget of the United States nearly every year. Yet I have been noticing a lot of people screaming to the heavens about the cost of foreign aid: “Oh‚ I can’t believe how much this is costing.” There are some people who are consistent libertarians. There are some people who say the government shouldn’t be spending on Social Security‚ disability‚ welfare‚ and foreign aid. That is‚ at least‚ a consistent position. I think it’s wrongheaded because America’s foreign policy interests require that we have strong allies who eventually will be able to take care of themselves. But there is also a group of people in the Republican Party who are taking the view that foreign aid is a uniquely bad spend‚ that we’re wasting taxpayer dollars. I don’t believe this is about fiscal responsibility‚ as they proclaim. When you continue to vote in favor of $5‚ $6‚ $7 trillion budgets every single year‚ but foreign aid is where you begin pinching pennies‚ I start to get a little suspicious. We currently spend about 22% of our federal budget every year on Social Security‚ which is a giant Ponzi scheme because it is a defined benefits plan‚ not a defined contribution plan. What you pay in is not‚ in fact‚ what you get out. For most people‚ you get out way more from Social Security than you ever paid in. Health care‚ which is Medicare/Medicaid‚ represents about 26% of the federal budget. National defense only represents 13% of the federal budget. So when you tell me that you are deeply worried about the less-than-one percent spent on foreign aid to allies in war time‚ I think that perhaps you have a different set of priorities. That suggests to me that there may be a set of ulterior motives I don’t fully understand. I don’t really understand what the motivation is for those who seem to suggest that Russia taking Ukraine is of zero interest to the United States. Russia taking Ukraine would be of major interest to the United States‚ not only because Ukraine is the third largest producer of wheat on planet Earth‚ but also because Ukraine is strategically placed directly on the border between Russia and Europe‚ which is presumably the reason why Vladimir Putin wants it. It would be a danger to Eastern Europe‚ particularly the Baltic states‚ if Russia were to take Ukraine.  Ukraine’s border being far from the borders of Lithuania and Latvia creates a massive problem for the Russian military. They would have to worry about NATO’s forces being deployed against Russia via Ukraine. It would free up American forces‚ NATO’s forces‚ and allied forces to fight an invasion of NATO’s allies like Finland‚ Estonia‚ Latvia‚ and Lithuania. Right now‚ Ukraine is fighting NATO’s war. That is a reality. Ukraine is weakening the Russian military and providing a bulwark against NATO’s states being invaded. The Wall Street Journal reported on this‚ saying: House Speaker Mike Johnson said Wednesday he would plunge ahead with a high-stakes vote to move long-stalled funding for Ukraine‚ Israel and other overseas allies‚ elbowing aside criticism from his conservative flank. The move sets up an unpredictable weekend showdown that could determine both the fate of the foreign-aid package—and Johnson’s political career. Democrats will line up behind the aid effort. Johnson’s plan is to bring the subjects of Ukraine‚ Israel‚ Taiwan‚ and the TikTok ban‚ and package all of them together. The reality is that all of them are going to pass with a majority of both parties voting in favor. Yes‚ Johnson will require Democratic support in order to pass that bill. A majority of Republicans in the House will vote for that bill. Also‚ there is a Democratic Senate and a Democratic president‚ which means that if it is any priority for Ukraine not to simply fall by running out of ammo to the Russians‚ then you’ve got to make the deal that you can make. In an interview with CNN‚ Johnson stated: Since World War II‚ really‚ the responsibility for the free world has been shifted onto our shoulders. And we accept that role. We’re an exceptional nation. We’re the greatest nation on the planet‚ and we have to act like it. And we have to project to Putin and Xi and Iran and North Korea and anybody else that we will defend freedom. It doesn’t mean boots on the ground. We’re not the world’s policeman‚ but we’re going to do the right thing. And I think the Congress is going to take an important stand here. This is basic Reagan Republicanism. I know “Reagan” has become a dirty word for some reason‚ despite the fact Reagan won the Cold War and led to the greatest peacetime economic expansion in American history. Somehow‚ we’re supposed to believe a bunch of clowns riding the back seats of the House of Representatives‚ who have not actually accomplished anything in their entire political career‚ and have some really mean words about Ronald Reagan’s foreign policy. Now‚ is this going to be a perfect bill&;#63; No. There’s going to be a bunch of crap in the bill you don’t like. There’s going to be a bunch of crap in the bill I don’t like. Is this bill perfect&;#63; No. Does it have a lot of problems&;#63; Yes. Is this bill necessary in order to preserve the strength of America’s allies&;#63; Yes. That is why Johnson is right to move the bill forward. There’s also a politically important reason to do so: If you want Republicans to win a broader majority and actually make the serious kinds of cuts to government that are necessary‚ you need to win Congress by more than three votes. In order for that to happen‚ you have to win purple districts. And the bill is relatively popular in purple districts‚ by every available polling metric.

A transgender-identifying teenager who was taken into custody and charged for alleged plans to commit a mass shooting at a Maryland high school kept a “manifesto” in which she praised the Nashville mass shooter‚ fantasized about pedophilia‚ and voiced concerns about being misgendered after her crime‚ according to court documents obtained by The Daily Wire. The thwarted shooter‚ an 18-year-old woman from Rockville who identifies as a man‚ was arrested on Wednesday by the Montgomery County Police Department (MCPD)‚ the county said in a news release‚ adding that the FBI had obtained a 129-page “manifesto” in which the teenager wrote about committing a school shooting‚ contemplated targeting an elementary school‚ and more. The court documents obtained by The Daily Wire show disturbing examples from the “manifesto‚” which the teenager claimed was fictional‚ but an MCPD officer said had mirrored real-life events and was “based on reality with a plan of threats of mass violence.” “I really want to be famous. Even infamous‚” she wrote on one page. A second entry confesses to pedophilic thoughts‚ but says she chose not to act on them — “I sometimes think I’m a pedophile. I get turned on by little kids‚” she wrote. In a third‚ the teenager said she wanted to be killed by police after the shooting. The court documents also show that the teenager did a Google search on the transgender-identifying shooter who murdered six people at the Covenant School in Nashville in March of 2023. She appears to have been inspired by the mass shooting. Media calling the now-dead Nashville shooter by birth name rather than preferred name made the arrested teenager want to change her name‚ she wrote in the manifesto. “Makes me want to change my name legally before I commit a shooting to make sure the news doesn’t misgender me‚” the teenager wrote. “He was suicidal before the shooting. Just like me. He‚ too‚ wanted to kill little kids. A rush of adrenaline fills my body. He’s so relatable.” As a result of the investigation‚ the MCPD’s Community Engagement Division coordinated with Montgomery County Public Schools to increase security at schools‚ particularly Wootton High School‚ police said. The suspect was hospitalized in December 2022 after threatening to “shoot up a school‚” and has not attended school in-person since then‚ the charging documents say. She spent time hospitalized for homicidal and suicidal ideations‚ but later returned home and attended school online‚ the documents show. She was hospitalized again last month after she shared her manifesto with a fellow patient at a prior hospitalization‚ and that friend reported it to police. Hospital staff “felt they were required by law to break confidentiality to notify law enforcement and Wootton High School. The FBI was also notified‚” the documents say‚ adding that she “has previously disclosed to psychiatric staff during his in-patient treatment that he had thoughts of a mass attack at his elementary school and high school.” The police affidavit refers to the suspect with male pronouns. A Wootton High School counselor told the FBI that she worked with the suspect from October 2022 through February 2023 and that the suspect “would express violent thoughts such as shooting up the school.” The suspect suggested it could occur at graduation. The teenager is currently being held at the Montgomery County Central Processing Unit where she awaits a bond hearing‚ the release from police noted‚ adding that a news conference is being planned for Friday. The Daily Wire is not naming the suspect due to our policy against printing the names or photographs of mass shooters in our reports. Police made clear that the suspected teen is a biological female who was going by male pronouns. The legal system is treating her as an Asian female‚ authorities said. Online court records showed the suspect has an attorney. The Daily Wire reached out seeking comment. A bail/bond review is scheduled for Friday and a trial is slated for June 3.

'Other vehicles‚ both human and autonomously driven‚ followed the Waymo vehicle into the road closure

The alleged murderer was arrested and charged

'JetBlue 1554‚ STOP&;#33;'

Here's What We Know About The Twelve Jurors Selected For Trump's Trial

'It's a complicated injury‚ as anyone who's injured their shoulder will tell you'

Iran is incredibly weak and vulnerable

Bruce Springsteen fans will be greeted with a new Bruce Springsteen release on April 19‚ 2024. But dont get lost in your high hopes just yet. No‚ it’s not a new studio album‚ it’s the latest Bruce Springsteen Greatest Hits Package called The Best Of Bruce Springsteen. This will be Bruce Springsteen’s sixth greatest hits collection that Columbia Records has released. It’s the first in eight years since Chapter and Verse came out in 2016. Interestingly‚ this Greatest Hits package comes out from an artist who‚ in the first twenty years of his career‚ never released a “greatest hits” package The post 2024 Best Of Bruce Springsteen CD Comes With No Rare Tracks appeared first on ClassicRockHistory.com.