News Time Cut Netflix Goes Back to the Past in More Ways Than One With the Trailer for Time Cut Oops, they did it again By Molly Templeton | Published on October 4, 2024 Screenshot: Netflix Comment 0 Share New Share Screenshot: Netflix So there’s this girl, see, and decades earlier, someone in her town was murdered, and somehow, she winds up going back in time to try to stop the murder from ever happening. Does this… sound familiar? It might, because while Time Cut is about sisters and going back to the dreaded early 2000s, last year, Netflix released Totally Killer, in which Kiernan Shipka went back to the dreaded ’80s to stop a murder. Time Cut makes the problem a little more personal: One of the murder victims was the older sister of Lucy Field (Outer Banks’ Madison Bailey). What’s more, Lucy never even met poor murdered Summer (Antonia Gentry, from Ginny & Georgia). So when the opportunity presents itself, she slips back to the early naughties to change Summer’s fate. And, of course, this means a crash course in CDs, low-rise jeans, those deadly-seeming shoes with the wheels in ’em, really terrible tight cropped T-shirts, Avril Lavigne, and a whole lot more. I will give them points for murder-by-shard-of-broken-CD. Naturally, the trailer includes both worries about the future of the space-time continuum and a trip to the mall. (Watch out for the escalators.) Time Cut comes from director Hannah Macpherson (T@gged); it’s written by Macpherson and Michael Kennedy (Freaky). It’s on Netflix October 30th.[end-mark] The post Netflix Goes Back to the Past in More Ways Than One With the Trailer for <i>Time Cut</i> appeared first on Reactor.

Irony Alert...

The ancient organisms could help us understand the origins of life on Earth, and may also aid the search for life on other planets.

Sit back, relax, and let’s Break It Down in episode 34...

The destroyer served on both sides during World War II before being deliberately sunk nearly 80 years ago.

The event claimed more lives than either of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The event we reported yesterday has been beaten.

CNN’s Chris Wallace took his 1960 election-related book tour to CBS and The Late Show with Stephen Colbert on Thursday, where he lamented that the “crazy” Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity has made Special Counsel Jack Smith’s life more difficult and sarcastically claimed it was “totally coincidental” that it was a 6-3 ruling along partisan lines with three Trump appointees in the majority. Colbert led Wallace with more of a statement than a question, “The big news today everybody's covering is Jack Smith's filing in the 2020 election case, or rather, his evidentiary filing, having to do with whether Donald Trump's actions were official, in other words, someone in office, or someone seeking office.”     Wallace continued, “I mean, we went from 250 years without presidents having immunity for official acts, and nobody talked about that with Richard Nixon and Watergate or Ronald Reagan with Iran-Contra, but suddenly an official act, you couldn't break the law, which one, strikes me as complete nonsense and two, has resulted in Jack Smith having to write this brief saying, “Well, yeah, but when he did this, yeah, he was in the Oval Office, but he was using his private phone, so it was an unofficial act.” Breaking into the DNC headquarters would be hard to justify as an official act and Reagan was never in danger of being prosecuted for reasons both related to the question of prosecuting a president and because of the lack of evidence against him. Still, it can be hard to believe that Wallace was at Fox News not that long ago because he sounds like the rest of CNN. Later, he added: Richard Nixon during Watergate in 1974, the Supreme Court ruled that he couldn't keep the tapes that were hidden. He had to—because it involved the possibility of a crime and had to be turned over. So, you know, the kind of feeling on the Supreme Court seemed to be up to that point, the precedent was that a president, as opposed to a precedent, was not shielded from the law. So, this was new law that the Supreme Court decided and, I don't know, the fact that it has a 6-3 conservative majority in three of the justices were appointed by Donald Trump, I'm sure, is totally coincidental. Colbert concurred, “Nothing to do with it.” As hard as it may be for Wallace and Colbert to see in the moment, the Court provided guidance for all presidents, past and future, not just the ones they don’t like. One day, they will be thanking the Court for its ability to see more than five minutes into the future. Here is a transcript for the October 3-taped show: CBS The Late Show with Stephen Colbert 10/4/2024 12:08 AM ET STEPHEN COLBERT: The big news today everybody's covering is Jack Smith's filing in the 2020 election case, or rather, his evidentiary filing, having to do with whether Donald Trump's actions were official, in other words, someone in office, or someone seeking office. CHRIS WALLACE: Right, because of the Supreme Court's crazy ruling.  COLBERT: Yes. WALLACE: I mean, we went from 250 years without presidents having immunity for official acts— COLBERT: Right. WALLACE: -- and nobody talked about that with Richard Nixon and Watergate or Ronald Reagan with Iran-Contra, but suddenly an official act, you couldn't break the law, which one, strikes me as complete nonsense and two, has resulted in Jack Smith having to write this brief saying, “Well, yeah, but when he did this, yeah, he was in the Oval Office, but he was using his private phone, so it was on unofficial act.” … COLBERT:  Richard Nixon, who features prominently in Countdown 1960. It's a beautiful cover. Don't even read the book. Just look at the cover. Show your friends. WALLACE: No, no, no, what's inside it is even better than what's on the outside, but having said that, Richard Nixon during Watergate in 1974, the Supreme Court ruled that he couldn't keep the tapes that were hidden. He had to — because it involved the possibility of a crime and had to be turned over. So, you know, the kind of feeling on the Supreme Court seemed to be up to that point, the precedent was that a president, as opposed to a precedent, was not shielded from the law. So, this was new law that the Supreme Court decided and, I don't know, the fact that it has a 6-3 conservative majority in three of the justices were appointed by Donald Trump, I'm sure, is totally coincidental. COLBERT: Nothing to do with it.

Undercover journalist James O’Keefe went to the front lines of the migrant industrial complex in his new documentary “Line in the Sand,” and what he found was shocking. “What my takeaway was, actually, from having lived through this and gone down there and been in Mexico and faced it with the cartel, is that it’s all about money,” O’Keefe tells Alex Stein of “Prime Time with Alex Stein.” “Everyone is making money off of it. And there was one scene in the film where the cartel is cutting through the fence, and I’m face to face with them. And first they were startled, and then they were like, ‘You need to leave because we need to make money,’” he explains. “That’s what I heard over and over again. They’re getting $10,000 per person. So it’s like that old adage, ‘Just follow the money,’” he says, adding, “and the government’s funding it.” Stein is disturbed by O’Keefe’s findings, but in classic "Prime Time" fashion, jokes that he himself “just got back from Haiti.” “It’s beautiful,” Stein says. “There’s no Haitians there. It’s wide open. You can just leave your keys and wallet out while you go swimming on the beach.” “Haiti is the safest place. Haiti is safer than New York City right now. We should be in Haiti, I’m telling you,” he continues, adding, “You don’t have to worry about any crime. They’re all here.” Want more from Alex Stein?To enjoy more of Alex's culture jamming, comedic monologues, skits, and street segments, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

An alleged Mississippi home invader was fatally shot in an exchange of gunfire after midnight last week.The Tunica County Sheriff’s Office said it received a 911 call from a resident in the 1600 block of Beatline Road in Tunica just after 1 a.m. last Friday reporting an attempted home invasion. Tunica is in the northwest part of the state and is about 40 miles southwest of Memphis, Tennessee.'This is our little town where we should feel safe.'The caller said there was an exchange of gunfire, and two people were shot, officials said.Arriving sheriff's deputies found a 46-year-old male who lives at the home who was suffering from a gunshot wound, officials said, adding that he was treated at the scene and flown to a Memphis hospital.Deputies found a second male — identified as Nadarius Joiner, 30, of Tunica — who was wounded by gunfire. Officials said he was treated at the scene and died."Homeowners have a constitutional right to protect their homes once a person gains entrance," the sheriff's office said. "No arrests have been made."Officials said those with information are urged to contact the Tunica County Sheriff’s Office at 662-363-1411; those who wish to remain anonymous can contact CrimeStoppers at 662-910-0400. Officials said any information leading to an arrest can pay up to $1,000.How are people reacting?Commenters on the Facebook post from the sheriff's office about the incident made their voices heard. Here are a few reactions:"Justifiable," one commenter said."I hope Tunica does not get as bad as Memphis," another user said. "This is our little town where we should feel safe.""Got that lead," another commenter said. "Found the right house.""Sad," another user noted.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!