"Hard Knocks" ... NBA edition

The Hunt for Yahya Sinwar (Is He Wearing Dresses Now?)

Monday's Final Word

Thousands of radical leftists marched in the streets of Chicago during the Democratic National Convention, mostly in protest of Israel's war against Hamas. The media initially covered it, but quickly lost interest when there wasn't a riot. They preferred Kamala's "joy" over exacerbating the division in their base between the Jewish voters and the Muslim voters.  MRCTV Director Eric Scheiner recounts the sorry sound of the streets. The networks never found the slightest fraction of irony in building a wall for the convention. No embarrassment there. Triple-reinforced, and yet somebody broke through. Scheiner says only a few protesters were radical enough to charge into the hole in the fencing, and they were promptly arrested by the cops. The masses apparently didn't want to spend some time at the police stations. The largest protest crowd came on Thursday night, but by then, the networks were completely focused on Kamala's acceptance speech and putting the best possible spin on the convention's end and how the nominee was "speaking before a packed arena hanging on her every word" (PBS). We heard a lot about flying the American flag and chants of USA. This was described as brilliant. But outside the arena, the protesters carried many Palestine flags, some draped around their shoulders. The clash tells a story. Common signs on the scene included "Genocide Joe’s legacy: butcher of Gaza," and "Democrats fund the genocide of Palestinians." There was also "Abandon Kamala" and one article reported the chant, “Over 40,000 dead, DNC your hands are red!” It's not hard to imagine the media avoiding any audio or video of that messaging. Enjoy the podcast below, or wherever you listen to podcasts. 

Last Wednesday, California’s state legislature announced a $250 million deal to partner with the big tech giant Google to fund local journalism and artificial intelligence research. In a draft summary released to Politico, the bill aims to “strengthen democracy and the future of work in an Artificial Intelligence future through a public-private partnership between Google and the state of California. Canada, France, and others have passed similar legislation to fund newsrooms in their countries, but California’s marks the first of these public-private partnerships in America. Amidst declining demand for journalists and increasing layoffs in the industry, Google will contribute $55 million and California’s taxpayers will contribute $70 million toward the University of California, Berkeley, School of Journalism’s “News Transformation Fund” to provide financial resources to local newsrooms over the course of five years. Instead of being charged for utilizing local news outlets’ content, Google acts as a quasi-investor, allowing the company to potentially advocate for its big tech agenda by shaping the direction of journalism to fit its narrative. Google will also continue to provide $10 million annual grants to newsrooms, in addition to millions more for an AI accelerator program that proponents of the legislation claim will allow journalists to use and adapt to new technologies. In a statement, California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) wrote, “This agreement represents a major breakthrough in ensuring the survival of newsrooms and bolstering local journalism across California — leveraging substantial tech industry resources without imposing new taxes on Californians," and added that "the deal not only provides funding to support hundreds of new journalists but helps rebuild a robust and dynamic California press corps for years to come, reinforcing the vital role of journalism in our democracy." However, others worry that the current iteration gives too much power to Google and that the added funding for the AI program will do more harm than good to journalists. Lee Hepner, senior legal counsel at the American Economic Liberties Project, a nonprofit advocating for aggressive antitrust and anti-monopoly policies, threw shade at the deal, calling it a “backroom deal” that “is bad for journalists, publishers, and all Californians.” Union leaders, including leaders of the Media Guild of the West, the NewsGuild-CWA, and others also released a statement titled, “California's journalists do not consent to this shakedown” to voice their opposition to the bill since “the future of journalism should not be decided in backroom deals.” “After two years of advocacy for strong antimonopoly action to start turning around the decline of local newsrooms, we are left almost without words,” they stated. “The publishers who claim to represent our industry are celebrating an opaque deal involving taxpayer funds, a vague AI accelerator project that could very well destroy journalism jobs, and minimal financial commitments from Google to return the wealth this monopoly has stolen from our newsrooms.” Previously, Google staunchly opposed iterations of the bill and claimed that it would “put support of the news ecosystem at risk.” The original bill would have forced Google and other big tech giants to contribute a portion of their advertising revenues to local journalists and newsrooms in exchange for their content, whereas the current bill relies on a public-private partnership. Jaffer Zaidi, Google’s vice president of global news partnerships, said that the previous bill would “create a ‘link tax’ that would require Google to pay for simply connecting Californians to news articles. … If passed,” Zaidi added, the bill “may result in significant changes to the services we can offer Californians and the traffic we can provide to California publishers.” So Google decided to retaliate and temporarily blocked and blacklisted local outlets’ content from appearing in its searches, emulating its own tactics in response to similar legislation in other countries. Later, California gave up and stripped the bill of its tax and replaced it with the current public-private partnership. As a result, Google and other big tech giants cheered for the bill’s success since the current iteration essentially grants Google access to influence local news outlets’ content in exchange for some funding, further expanding the company's monopoly power. Instead of being charged for utilizing local news outlets’ content, Google acts as a quasi-investor, allowing the company to potentially advocate for its big tech agenda by shaping the direction of journalism to fit its narrative. Kent Walker, president of global affairs and chief legal officer for Alphabet, Google’s parent company, praised California lawmakers and the tech and news industry for collaborating to support local journalism. “This public-private partnership builds on our long history of working with journalism and the local news ecosystem in our home state, while developing a national center of excellence on AI policy,” Walker said. Similarly, Jason Kwon, chief strategy officer for OpenAI, stated, “A strong press is a key pillar of democracy, and [OpenAI] is proud to be part of this partnership to utilize AI in support of local journalism across America.”

Media veteran Edgar Bronfman Jr. on Monday withdrew from the race to bid for Paramount Global, clearing the way for Skydance Media to take control of Shari Redstone's media empire. In a statement, Bronfman said his bidding group had informed Paramount's special committee on ...

Approximately one in two bus passengers failed to pay the fare when boarding a bus in New York City in the first three months of 2024, according to the latest stats from the Metropolitan Transit Authority.

A Tasmanian scientist is claiming he knows the location of the missing Malaysian plane MH370.

Police in Nashville, Tennessee, released dramatic video of an officer tackling a fugitive wanted for murder who was on the run for more than a year in connection to a crime that happened in August 2021.The…

I thought I'd end the day with a look at the state of the campaign ads since I hadn't done that for a bit.Not to mention, I'm getting all sorts of Harris texts. As it's irking me enormously, so I hope…