Thirteen nations have signed a WEF treaty agreeing to dismantle and rebuild major cities under the guise of their so-called Agenda 2030. Using climate change as the ultimate cover, the WEF has set the stage [...] The post 13 Nations Sign WEF Treaty To Destroy and Rebuild Major Cities Before 2030 appeared first on The People's Voice.

Steven Koonin is a professor at NYU Stern School of Business and the director of the Center for Urban Science and Progress (CUSP). He is a theoretical physicist and a leading voice calling for what he describes as “climate realism.” Koonin was on the faculty of the California Institute of Technology for almost three decades. […] The post Steven Koonin: Climate Didn’t Cause California Fires, Politicians Did appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

US soldiers are sharing videos from an aircraft carrier via the CCP’s REDnote App. It’s literally called “REDnote.” The Chinese Communist Party controls all companies in China. Military discipline is lost, but they probably know their pronouns. Soldiers used to go to prison for things like this. The app description of Google Play: REDnote, the overseas […] The post US Soldiers Take Photos from an Aircraft Carrier Via CCP App appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

'Dr. Daszak lacks the present responsibility to participate'

Let’s make one thing perfectly clear right from the start. Just because this is an article on Three Dog Night love songs doesn’t necessarily mean that these are all slow songs. Three Dog Night released some of the most grooving rock and roll songs full of soul and love of all time. Three Dog Night, formed in 1967 in Los Angeles, California, became one of the most successful and beloved bands of their era, blending rock, pop, and soul into a unique sound that captivated audiences worldwide. Comprised of vocalists Danny Hutton, Chuck Negron, and Cory Wells, along with talented The post Top 10 Three Dog Night Love Songs appeared first on ClassicRockHistory.com.

Remember when MSNBC fired Don Lemon not long after his female co-hosts had become infuriated when he said that Nikki Haley was not "in her prime" because she was over 40, and that they could Google it? Could Michael Steele be the next MSNBC male on the hot seat? On Saturday's episode of The Weekend, there was a discussion of the decision to move the inauguration inside given the frigid weather in DC. When Steele wondered why the inauguration date couldn't be moved back to March, as it was in the past, Symone Sanders gave a concise answer: "the Constitution." Steele rudely responded: "What was that? No. The inauguration was held in March right up through Roosevelt, and then they changed it. It isn't the Constitution. Come on." If you're going to take the controversial step of correcting a colleague on the air, Michael, you better get your facts right. Symone was correct: the Constitution, in the form of the 20th Amendment, changed the end of the president and vice president's terms, and hence the inauguration, from March to January 20th.  It would take another amendment to switch it to back to March. And that would be a terrible idea. A long interval between the election and the inauguration might have been necessary in the 1800s and into the early 1900s, when transportation and communications were very slow. But a four-month interregnum is not only unnecessary, but would create a fiasco of uncertainty.  Some people are already wondering who the actual president has been since the election. Imagine if Biden, or some equally enfeebled future president, hung on to the Oval Office far beyond election day. Ironically, in the show's second hour, Steele attacked Pam Bondi, Trump's Attorney General nominee, for responding to the Democrat senator questioning her about the contents of the 14th Amendment, "This is not time for me to take a test. I'm not here to do your homework for you." Sniped Steele: "That's because you don't know what you're talking about. So you don't want to take the test. And the test is the job, and you failed already." When it comes to not knowing the Amendments to the Constitution: Michael Steele, heal thyself! Incredibly, Sanders was also dissed by her other co-host, Alicia Menendez. Sanders posed a question to NBC News correspondent Vaughan Hillyard about the Democrats' tactics in their questioning of Trump nominees. When Hillyard didn't instantly begin his response, Menendez interrupted, saying: "Let me, let me rephrase Symone's question, which is I think there's a question coming out of her question, which is like, does any of it matter?" Wow! That is some serious disrespect for a colleague!  Oh, to be a fly on the wall on The Weekend set when today's show is over! Symone is anything but a shrinking violet. There could be some serious fireworks in store!  Here's the transcript. MSNBC The Weekend 1/18/25 8:06 am ET SYMONE SANDERS: I mean, it's kind of hard to believe. And I mean, on one hand, you've got Senate Republicans who are literally, like, rolling over for Donald Trump, even when they don't believe it. Because I actually don't believe that Joni Ernst, if she, you know, didn't have the threat of being primaried hung over her head, she would be going along with the get-along here. But she wants to keep her seat. So you've got Senate Republicans doing that.  And then you've got Senate Democrats, where many folks have said that they were surprised by how they all necessarily didn't rise to the occasion, right? Like, it didn't seem in some of the questioning, in some of these hearings, it seemed like there was some coordination amongst the Democrats, and they were asking very pointed and real questions. But then for some of them, it seemed like grandstanding.  You know, and Congress is an equal partner here. They are a co-equal branch of government. It's not like you do what the president says. You're a co-equal branch of government.  And I'm just wondering how you all read that. Like, did you? I don't know. I kind of felt that Senator Gillibrand will be here. And she was, I thought, excellent. Very pointed questioning of Pete Hegseth, direct questions. Senator Tammy Duckworth, direct questions. I thought that Andy Kim was direct questions. But then there were some other folks in some of these other hearings. I'm like, what's going on?  Oh, y'all don't want to criticize Democrats today?  ALICIA MENENDEZ: Well, but here's, let me, let me rephrase Simone's question, which is, I think there's a question coming out of her question, which is like, does any of it matter, right? If Republicans have decided that this is all a big show, Vaughn, and that they are going to do whatever they need to do to pave the way for Donald Trump's nominees, then is there anything Democrats could do that would change that?  . . .  SANDERS: The inauguration is now inside, Vaughn. What can you tell us? I just want to note, it's been cold before. Inaugurations have happened outside.  VAUGHAN HILLYARD: That is accurate. Barack Obama had a very cold one. The temperatures were in the 20s. Now, let me be very clear. It is very cold outside and will be cold outside. I think we're looking at a high of 21 degrees.  You know, this is going to be, this was a decision that was made to move everybody in. The President-elect cited health concerns, not only for the attendees that were coming, but also for police personnel, including the horses. As I'm looking outside the window here, they are tough conditions, and I don't think some of us who were assigned to be on outside patrol even mind it moving inside for whatever reason.  MICHAEL STEELE: Well, there's still the value of moving the inauguration back to March. I don't know why they ever moved it to January in the first place, but here we are.  SANDERS: The Constitution.  STEELE: What was that?  SANDERS: The Constitution.  STEELE: No. The inauguration was held in March right up through Roosevelt, and then they changed it. It isn't the Constitution. Come on.

These days, it has become almost mandatory to mock “the kids” — their TikTok obsessions, relentless “doom-scrolling” on Instagram, and “know-nothing” attitudes. They grunt, moan, and communicate via emojis, GIFs, and hashtags, emerging from their digital layers just long enough to make it to class or snatch food from the Uber Eats guy. Imagine if these extremely talented kids, armed with nothing more than a smartphone and a few low-tech tricks, turn their attention to banks, hospitals, or even the power grids of entire nations. Yet some of these zombies-in-the-making are up to something far more disruptive than scrolling or snapping selfies. They are infiltrating and embarrassing the world’s most powerful corporations. They've brought industry giants to their knees with a few low-tech tricks, social engineering hacks, and youthful persistence. “Can’t make it to dinner, Mom,” they scream, “too busy making Microsoft sweat.” Advanced adolescence Dubbed “advanced persistent teenagers,” these young hackers are not only one of the biggest threats to global corporations but also expose the shaky foundations of our digital world. Groups like LAPSUS$ and Scattered Spider may chase fame and fortune, but critically, their primary motivation seems to be the sheer thrill of it. In recent months, they’ve pulled off some of the boldest hacks in modern history, targeting hotel chains, casinos, and tech giants using methods that would embarrass any cybersecurity expert. No sophisticated espionage here — just brash smash-and-grab tactics executed with clinical effectiveness. It’s important to note that nations do not back these teens. They’re a ragtag band of virtual vigilantes who flaunt their hacks on social media with snapshots of breached systems and leaked data. They have taken the art of trolling to a whole new level. These strategies recall the 2020 Twitter (now X) hack, where young hackers posed as internal IT support to gain access, exploiting employees’ trust rather than high-tech systems. With a fake call here or a well-timed email there, LAPSUS$ and Scattered Spider trick employees into handing over the keys to the kingdom. Targets include tech titans like Microsoft, Samsung, Nvidia, and, more recently, several hotel chains and casinos, including MGM Resorts. Offering bribes or targeting individuals’ emails, the groups often start with minor accounts, which they use to worm their way into corporate systems. In a world where hackers are meant to lurk in the shadows, these teens are setting off flares. Conflicted and confused Should we shed a single tear for these corporate giants? Many readers will scream “absolutely not” for entirely valid reasons. Microsoft, for one, has long been associated with a number several sites. From wielding monopolistic power that crushed competitors to pushing software that seems more focused on control than innovation, the company has played the tech game with the heaviest of hands, and its relentless drive for data often crosses privacy lines that leave users feeling more surveilled than served. Also, as I write this, Microsoft is still pushing the DEI agenda with relentless enthusiasm despite most sane Americans wanting nothing to do with it. Similarly, Nvidia, one of the most powerful tech companies in the world, is no stranger to scandal. The American company has faced a series of controversies that reveal a pattern of miscommunication and questionable practices. First, the GTX 970 fiasco left customers with a misleadingly marketed graphics card, where its supposed 4 GB memory turned out to be 3.5 GB of high-speed and 0.5 GB of slow memory, leading to performance issues. Nvidia's promised driver fix never materialized, leading to performance issues, forcing it to settle a class-action lawsuit. The GeForce Partner Program stirred antitrust concerns, since it incentivized exclusivity only to be canceled amid backlash. To be clear, it was canceled only because Nvidia was exposed. The California-based corporation also attempted to restrict the reviewer Hardware Unboxed, prompting accusations of extreme overreach. Additionally, Nvidia was hit with an SEC fine for failing to disclose how much crypto mining bolstered its revenue, misleading investors. Samsung, another target of the terrible teens, made headlines not too long ago when its Galaxy Note phones started blowing up — literally. It’s difficult to feel any sympathy for these companies, now getting a well-deserved taste of their own medicine. At the same time, it’s worth asking what we should think about these teenagers. Are they digital Robin Hoods exposing corporate arrogance, or are they future terrorists refining techniques that could one day bring nations to their knees? Is Microsoft just a warm-up for thier own Manhattan Project? Imagine if these extremely talented kids, armed with nothing more than a smartphone and a few low-tech tricks, turn their attention to banks, hospitals, or even the power grids of entire nations. Then it’s not just Big Tech elites taking the hit — it’s all of us. Suddenly, their antics are no longer a corporate headache; they’re a real-world threat. People could die. Lots and lots of people. As we move further into the digital age, these “advanced persistent teenagers” serve as a sobering reminder of just how fragile our world truly is. For now, their exploits might seem entertaining, almost harmless, but the thrill could easily turn into a horror show — one where the power to stop it lies solely in their hands.

JUUUUST a Bit Outside! Alex Rodriguez's Tribute to Sportscaster Bob Uecker Strikes Out

Trump and Melania Ascend Air Force One for Historic Second Inauguration