What Happened to Biden's Border Plan?

In a cozy corner of the house‚ a German Shepherd named Rocky stumbles upon a scene that brings his world to a delightful pause. His beloved dog bed‚ usually a personal retreat‚ is now the domain of several tiny‚ audacious kittens. This unexpected turn of events sets the stage for a heartwarming spectacle of curiosity‚... The post German shepherd is puzzled finding kittens in his bed and cuteness ensues appeared first on Animal Channel.

In a cozy corner of the house‚ a German Shepherd named Rocky stumbles upon a scene that brings his world to a delightful pause. His beloved dog bed‚ usually a personal retreat‚ is now the domain of several tiny‚ audacious kittens. This unexpected turn of events sets the stage for a heartwarming spectacle of curiosity‚... The post German shepherd finds kittens in bed and his adorable reaction earns 15M views appeared first on Animal Channel.

Picture this: a brave little dog named Dash‚ sitting motionless‚ eyes locked in a silent showdown with a massive mountain lion. This tense scene unfolded at Sarah Bole’s home in Colorado‚ nestled between Grand Lake and Granby‚ as she returned from work around 5 pm. The dramatic encounter was captured on video‚ showing Dash‚ completely... The post Tiny dog fearlessly stares down a ferocious mountain lion appeared first on Animal Channel.

How many times do we have to say that there’s no such thing as a “family-friendly” event that includes sex toys‚ booties‚ and tits? Tampa‚ Florida hosted a pride event over the weekend. It was advertised as an “all ages family-friendly” event‚ yet featured not only numerous sexually explicit individuals dancing and trotting around for kids to see‚ but even had sex toys and erotic merchandise for sale. The event was facilitated by a group called Tampa Pride. The group works “To organize year round events‚ culminating in an annual Pride event that celebrates members of the LGBTQ+ community in Tampa and the surrounding areas – championing our shared experiences‚ honoring our differences and strengthening our community‚” according to its website. Apparently‚ that also means indoctrinating‚ grooming and traumatizing little kids in the process. A video was shared by Gays Against Groomers bashing the event and explaining how pride is “not for kids.” In it‚ numerous disturbing sites from the event were displayed. Scenes from yesterday’s Pride in Tampa‚ FL. Does this look kid friendly to you? It might… if you’re a groomer. PRIDE IS NOT FOR KIDS! Shame on any parent who brought their children there. #GaysAgainstGroomers pic.twitter.com/zJnW9DmHXc — Gays Against Groomers (@againstgrmrs) March 24‚ 2024 One example was an image of an overweight drag queen on a parade float. He was wearing a pink striped flapper dress with a masquerade mask and carried what looked like a stuffed mouse in his hand. He also had his two bare boobies hanging out‚ nipples and all. Though they were obviously fake‚ they shouldn’t have been in the eyesight of little kids yet‚ they were. His accomplice dressed a little differently. Similarly‚ however‚ he was also way too exposed. This dude had on a strappy top that covered absolutely nothing and really just drew attention to his nipples that were strategically positioned in triangle cut-outs of his top. As for his bottoms‚ or lack thereof‚ he wore a black and purple thong that accentuated not only his junk in the trunk but his junk in the…uh…engine?  In one image of this groomer‚ you could see a little girl standing what looked like only a few feet away from him and his barely covered genitalia.  If you ask me‚ I consider that child abuse. At the vendor section of the event‚ numerous displays of inappropriate merchandise were exposed. At one tent‚ a fan that read “MAKE ME CUM AGAIN” was displayed for all to see.  Another tent from "My Practice Candy‚" offered lollipops shaped like genitalia. The vendor had all different size penises and vaginas in various fruity flavors.  A sign that Gays Against Groomers posted indicated four special items that were for sale: a “Lickety Split‚” which was a vagina shaped lollipop‚ the “Average Joe” which was a six-inch penis pop‚ the “OMG!” which was seven-inches and then an eight-inch long “Mandingo” pop. Kids who passed by likely/hopefully didn’t realize that the lollipops were shaped like genitalia‚ but the bright‚ vibrant colors were undoubtedly enough to at least catch their attention. Again‚ that’s abusive and grooming. Speaking of abusive‚ Gays Against Groomers also shared an image of a little boy‚ who couldn’t have been more than three-years-old‚ holding a transgender flag in one hand and a bisexual flag in another‚ walking down the street. It really is heartbreaking that events like this are even happening‚ that adults think this behavior is okay to be shown in public and with confidence‚ and that kids were subject to it.  Lord‚ please send your Son again.

Under pressure after the passage of bipartisan House legislation‚ toxic and anti-free speech TikTok has a strange new strategy: turn teenagers into decision-makers. TikTok has come under fire for its ties to the communist Chinese government‚ harmful algorithms for young users‚ bias and censorship. Amid the backlash‚ the app is attempting to assuage fears with various tactics‚ including a new “Youth Council” for teenagers to give input. But will any root problems be addressed? A March 25 press release from TikTok explained the Youth Council comprises 15 teens aged 15 to 18 from around the world. The council is reportedly prioritizing “teen well-being and inclusion.” Moreover‚ TikTok is redesigning both its Youth Portal feature‚ which provides resources‚ and advertising its parental controls‚ especially for concerned U.S. parents. The press release did not address the fact the Chinese government-tied app has been involved in bias and censorship for years. MRC Free Speech America ranked TikTok among the worst censors of 2023 for its boastful removal of hundreds of thousands of videos about the Israel-Hamas war. In February‚ TikTok continued this policy trend by establishing a team of thousands of “content moderators” (i.e.‚ censors) to suppress free speech ahead of upcoming European Union elections. TikTok is also increasingly under fire for its security risks. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) owns a board seat and maintains a financial stake in TikTok’s parent company ByteDance. A 2023 lawsuit alleged that a “backdoor” through ByteDance enabled the CCP to access U.S. user data. Bipartisan TikTok-banning legislation passed the House but has yet to pass the Senate. President Joe Biden voiced his willingness to sign the bill if it did pass. Besides the national security risks‚ there are also the mental health risks for the very teens TikTok claims to promote. By late 2023‚ evidence indicates that a few hours on TikTok turned up potentially harmful content for mental health in one out of two videos in automated accounts. The new TikTok release claimed a focus on addressing bullying and body image issues. Repeated mentions of U.S. parents and kids throughout the press release indicated TikTok’s endeavors to appease Americans amidst ban threats. TikTok quoted a 15-year-old American Youth Council member enthusing‚ “I found the first meeting to be super exciting and positive.” TikTok’s Youth Council does not address the app’s deepest dangers for Americans‚ however. Conservatives are under attack. Contact TikTok via email at communitymanager@tiktok.com and demand Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment and provide transparency. If you have been censored‚ contact us at the Media Research Center contact form‚ and help us hold Big Tech accountable.

Leftist Big Tech giant Google seems unable to catch a break—and rightfully so! In remarks to media start-up The Free Press and Fox Business‚ former Google employees raised the alarm about the extent to which left-wing ideology has been embedded in the tech giant‚ corroborating widespread concerns that Google is actively peddling woke diversity‚ equity and inclusion (DEI) through its products. At least four former Google employees blew the whistle on DEI becoming “part of every single thing” in the Alphabet subsidiary. Even more telling was their statements that Gemini — Google’s infamous No Whites Allowed artificial intelligence chatbot — was the direct byproduct of the left-wing ideology at Google. Speaking to The Free Press‚ Shaun Maguire‚ a former partner at Google Ventures‚ declared not being “shocked at all” after critics—including MRC Free Speech America—caught Gemini bafflingly generating ethnically diverse photos of black Nazis‚ black George Washington and a woman Pope‚ among others. However‚ Maguire warned that “‘what happened was not a one-off incident’” but is rather “‘a symptom of a larger cultural phenomenon that has been taking over the company for years.’” Related: Is Google’s AI Racist? Product Lead’s Tweets Give Us an Indication Echoing Maguire’s remarks‚ a former AI researcher at Google Brain told Free Press anonymously: “‘The model is just a reflection of the people who trained it. It’s just a series of decisions that humans have made.’” James Damore‚ a former Google software engineer‚ issued a contentious memo in 2017 dubbed “Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber.” In it‚ he called out Google’s inherent discriminatory practices against men to increase the recruitment of women. According to The Free Press‚ Google fired Damore just a month after the memo. David Kiferbaum‚ a former Google business manager‚ said that his superiors at the tech giant pressured him into hiring minorities after Damore’s ouster. “We’re really looking for diverse candidates for this role‚” Kieferbaum recounted being told by Google‚ prompting his shock. “I was like‚ ‘Whoa‚ I can’t believe this person is saying this out loud‚’” he said. The Free Press’s sources echoed the remarks of a former high-level Google employee cited by Fox Business on March 21. The former employee exclaimed that the tech company is pushing “‘diversity’” in an alleged partisan attempt to appease the current political environment. The source said that as soon as President Joe Biden was elected‚ “‘it was diversity everything.’” The former employee stated that the bigger question went far beyond whether Google is simply pushing a certain agenda. “‘The question is‚ why do companies get to decide in the first place? Why does Google get to decide what I get access to based on what they think is right or wrong‚’” he asked. According to the Fox Business source‚ Google plays “whatever political side of the fence” whenever convenient‚ which given Google’s recent actions overwhelmingly indicates its sordid favor for the left. The source further elaborated‚ “‘What these companies do is they follow the climate of the environment that their app is operating in.’” The Fox Business source alleged that the current push for DEI is traceable to 2020‚ which followed the murder of George Floyd and the subsequent Black Lives Matter protests. The source alleged that Google had been pushing DEI philosophy since then. Fast forward to 2024‚ and now there is Gemini. Conservatives are under attack. Contact your representatives and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency‚ clarity on hate speech and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored‚ contact us using CensorTrack’s contact form‚ and help us hold Big Tech accountable.

Thanks to CNN leftist hack M.J. Lee and the ever-inept White House Press Secretary‚ Karine Jean-Pierre‚ Monday’s White House press briefing featured a not-so-subtle call for censorship in the news media and suggestions that Trump-friendly voices — such as Ronna McDaniel being hired by NBC News — be allowed “in the national political discourse” due to the aftermath of the 2020 election and the January 6‚ 2021 Capitol riot. Lee brought up NBC as the liberal media — and the peacock network writ large — are in the throes of a infantile public meltdown after NBC News brass chose to bring McDaniel in for a reported $300‚000 (triple what most elite commentators make — which isn’t chump change). The CNN hack’s softball showed how she (and her colleagues) felt about all this: I wanted to ask you about former RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel being hired by NBC News. Given that this is a White House that has condemned lies about January 6‚ condemned allies about the 2020 election‚ what do you make of the network hiring somebody who participated in a phone call — um — you know‚ pressuring Michigan officials to not certify certain votes. A former MSNBC contributor herself‚ Jean-Pierre disingenuously proclaimed “we’re always very mindful about personnel decisions...made by a media organization”‚ but nonetheless went into great detail lecturing NBC executives about the need to hue towards supporting the administration and educating the public on the supposed dangers of voting elsewhere.     Jean-Pierre cited Biden’s remarks at the ultra-elite Washington event The Gridiron Dinner as having addressed the “critical role that journalists play and — and they have — and protecting our democracy by making sure that the public knows the truth‚ that the public knows the facts.” “[H]e said...we need you. Democracy is at risk‚ and the American people need to know‚ in fractured times‚ they need a context and a perspective. They need substance to match the enormity of the task. It is a big task that journalists have‚ and we understand that and the facts and the truth are critical here‚” she added before reiterating her faux qualifier she wasn’t making a judgment one way or another. Lee had a blunt follow-up‚ wondering whether Trump supporters should be allowed to speak on TV: “[D]o you — does this White House‚ does the President believe that that — um — kind of voice — that voice like hers — that there’s room for her in the national political discourse?” Jean-Pierre implied the answer was no‚ citing January 6 as proof that those who oppose Biden behave violently when they don’t get their way and thus “it is important” the media and White House “are very clear to the public about the facts‚ that we are very clear to the public about the truth‚ and we understand the burden that you all have.” In contrast‚ CBS’s Ed O’Keefe grilled National Security Council official and frequent Jean-Pierre crutch Kirby on the U.S. abstaining on the latest resolution from the anti-Israel United Nations about the war in Gaza.  He also correctly noted it’s ironic for some U.S. officials to rip Israeli officials facing domestic political pressure to stay resolute when it’s Biden who’s adopted a more aggressive line against Israel to assuage Democratic voters (click “expand”): O’KEEFE: You say it’s not a shift in policy by voting for this today. Get specific with us as to why again and to the charge that‚ by even abstaining — because‚ normally‚ I mean‚ there may be some attempt at the U.N. Security Council or the U.N. overall to condemn Israel every so often for whatever reason‚ the U.S. usually stands up and vetoes those resolutions. Here now‚ for the first time in a while‚ the United States is at least abstaining and allowing it to go through. So‚ the perception broadly is that the U.S. is no longer got Israel’s back when it comes to conversations like this at the U.N. KIRBY: No‚ that’s just not true‚ Ed. Nothing could be further from the truth‚ quite frankly. Of course‚ we still have Israel’s back. I mean‚ as you and I are speaking‚ we are still providing tools and capabilities — weapons systems so that Israel can defend itself against which we — what we agree is still a viable threat to Hamas again. No change by this non-binding resolution what Israel can or cannot do in terms of defending itself. But‚ you know‚ the other day Friday when I was up here‚ Brian was asking me about‚ you know how — how come it was okay for‚ uh‚ or not okay for Russia and China to veto a resolution that we drafted on Friday when we vetoed similar ones prior to it. And — and — I — my answer‚ then is going to be my answer today because of the substance of it. The ones we veto didn’t condemn Hamas. This one didn’t condemn Hamas‚ which is why we couldn’t support it‚ but we didn’t veto it because‚ in general‚ unlike previous reser — resolutions‚ this one did fairly capture what has been our consistent policy‚ which is linking hostage deal in the release of those men and women with‚ of course‚ uh — uh — a temporary ceasefire. O’KEEFE: There are U.S. officials today saying Netanyahu’s acting this way because he’s facing some domestic political pressure — there’s domestic political issues going on. Aren’t there also domestic political pressures facing President Biden and that’s part of the reason why y’all are allowing this to happen today? KIRBY: I — I can’t speak for — O’KEEFE: You’ve got members of the Democratic Party‚ saying he’s doing this wrong. You’ve got the general public suggesting his support for Israel is [inaudible]. Is that part of why this is going through today? KIRBY: — no‚ absolutely not. And I got to take issue with the premise of the question. The President makes decisions based on the national security interests of the United States‚ and this decision to abstain on this resolution is in keeping with the national security interests of the United States and quite frankly‚ it’s in keeping with the national security concerns of the Israeli people. O’Keefe also touched on the border crisis: CBS’s @EdOKeefe: “The Customs and Border Policy [sic] — er‚ Border Patrol chief yesterday suggested in an interview that the situation in the southern borders and national security threat because of the roughly 140‚000 known gottaways‚ or those that crossed the border and were… pic.twitter.com/9mzkqRV0U9 — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) March 25‚ 2024 Serving as a stand-in for Peter Doocy and Jacqui Heinrich‚ Fox’s Rich Edson pressed Kirby on both the U.N. resolution abstention and the border crisis. Here was his exchange on the former: Fox's @RichEdsonDC: “John‚ on this resolution that the U.S. abstained for — abstained to today that was within the power of the United States to block‚ the — the Prime Minister said ‘it gives Hamas hope the international pressure will allow them to accept a ceasefire without the… pic.twitter.com/7Ab40JiPy8 — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) March 25‚ 2024 To see the relevant transcript from the March 25 briefing‚ click here.

Elected officials across the country have condemned President Joe Biden’s EPA for massively overstepping its mandate by forcing electric vehicles (EVs) on the American public. On the March 20 edition of Mornings with Maria Bartiromo‚ Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) told Fox Business anchor Maria Bartiromo that Biden’s decision to force electric cars on Americans would have serious consequences. Moore Capito panned Biden’s goal of over 50 percent EV ownership by 2032 as “unrealistic” before adding: “We’re now telling the consumer what to buy. The electric grid will falter under the demands of the electric vehicles.” Moore Capito’s warning is not just for future Americans. In 2022 in Gavin Newsom’s California‚ electric vehicle owners were given instructions on when to charge their electric vehicles to avoid threatening the grid. The West Virginia senator went on to list further potential issues for electric cars such as performance in different types of weather. The senator said‚ “How does this perform on the highway in terms of guardrails and other issues? So there's a whole host of issues‚ not the least of which the consumer can't afford them‚ doesn’t want them and they don’t fit the patterns of many consumers across the country.” Moore Capito was not alone. Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA) and Sens. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK)‚ Bill Hagerty (R-TN) and Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) all condemned the EPA regulation in posts on X. Hagerty put together a thread taking down the Biden Administration regulation while pointing out how the current push towards electric vehicles will make Americans more reliant on the Communist Chinese government. Mullin bashed the EV mandate as “costly” and “reckless.” Tuberville pointed out that Biden’s attempt to force Americans to choose electric vehicles was not only expensive for the government but also for the average car buyer. Tuberville wrote‚ “The average small car costs approximately $24‚500. The average cost of an EV is $55‚000‚ and that’s after THOUSANDS in government subsidies. Americans are already going broke thanks to Joe Biden’s inflation. We CANNOT afford the radical left’s climate agenda.” Clyde spoke up for Americans’ freedom to make their own choices about the vehicles they drive. “American consumers should decide what car they purchase and drive. Yet Joe Biden is doubling down on his radical EPA rule that institutes a de facto EV mandate on our country. Congress must stop this insanity‚" Clyde wrote. Even CNN acknowledged the ugly ramifications of this tyrannical regulation. During the March 25 edition of CNN This Morning‚ CNN co-anchor Kate Bouldan asked former Special Assistant to President Biden Meghan Hays to her face: has Biden thought this through?  Bouldan said‚ "If these companies are forced to produce more EVs and hybrids to meet the demands of this new regulation‚ there is a world where it could push up prices for combustion engine cars that some Americans are still gonna need." Conservatives are under attack! Contact ABC News at 818-460-7477‚ CBS News at 212-975-3247 and NBC News at 212-664-6192 and demand they hold Biden and his cronies accountable for attempting to restrict fossil fuel production and Americans’ choices.

Former President Trump was in a New York City courtroom to deal with the hush money case against him‚ on Monday‚ but when he stepped out of the courthouse to speak to the press‚ he threw MSNBC into a tailspin. The liberal network frantically cut off his audio and threw it back to 12:00 p.m. host Andrea Mitchell because he dared to say the case was “election interference.” Before Trump appeared outside the building‚ Mitchell was speaking with correspondent Vaughn Hillyard‚ who was outside the courthouse. Both were eager to hear what Trump had to say. “I can see him now!” Mitchell excitedly announced. HILLYARD: We are seeing him walk out here. He’s then going to make remarks. I’ll just step aside here‚ Andrea. MITCHELL: Yeah‚ Vaughn‚ let's listen. “Now‚ they're fighting over days because they want to try to do it during the election. This is election interference‚ that’s all it is. It is election interference. And it's a disgrace‚” Trump said before MSNBC could cut the feed. “But this is a pure case of voter intimidation and election interference. And it shouldn't be allowed to happen. This case could have been brought by the D.A.‚ but they didn’t want – [Audio cuts out]”     The disruption was so abrupt that Mitchell seemed caught off guard and struggled to find the word to dismiss Trump’s assertions. “And we’re going to – The former President is repeating what he has said often‚ that this is a case of election interference‚ which is arguably not the fact‚” she proclaimed. Mitchell was still fumbling around when she handed it off to NPR national political correspondent Mara Liasson to decry Trump for “spinning a lot of this”: MITCHELL: Mara Liasson‚ let’s – let’s – you jump in here‚ as well. They're talking about the way that he has been successfully spinning a lot of this. LIASSON: Spinning and delaying. So‚ there's tactics and there’s strategy. The tactic is to delay as long as possible‚ hopefully past the election. The strategy is to destroy American's faith in the justice system‚ so that whatever the result of these trials‚ Donald Trump can dismiss them or say that they're phony just like he tried to do with the election. And that's why you hear him saying election interference‚ voter intimidation. You know‚ he is casting this as if the justice system itself is on trial‚ not him. Mitchell went on to blame Trump for New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg waiting until 2023 to bring the case against Trump‚ knowing that it could conflict/complicate an election year: And he said that this is a case that could have been brought three and a half years ago‚ and they're now fighting over days. This is election interference. Of course‚ a lot of the delay in bringing the case‚ at least under‚ you know‚ prosecutor Bragg‚ not the previous investigation‚ had to do with the delays caused by all of the defense motions. The transcript is below. Click "expand" to read: MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Reports March 25‚ 2024 12:17:43 p.m. Eastern (…) VAUGHN HILLYARD: Donald Trump‚ we expect him to head -- ANDREA MITCHELL: I can see him now! HILLYARD: -- down the road to his skyscraper. We are seeing him walk out here. He’s then going to make remarks. I’ll just step aside here‚ Andrea. MITCHELL: Yeah‚ Vaughn‚ let's listen. DONALD TRUMP: Now‚ they're fighting over days because they want to try to do it during the election. This is election interference‚ that’s all it is. It is election interference. And it's a disgrace. Well‚ obviously‚ we appeal it. But this is a pure case of voter intimidation and election interference. And it shouldn't be allowed to happen. This case could have been brought by the D.A.‚ but they didn’t want – [Audio cuts out] MITCHELL: And we’re going to – The former President is repeating what he has said often‚ that this is a case of election interference‚ which is arguably not the fact. Mara Liasson‚ let’s – let’s – you jump in here‚ as well. They're talking about the way that he has been successfully spinning a lot of this. MARA LIASSON: Spinning and delaying. So‚ there's tactics and there’s strategy. The tactic is to delay as long as possible‚ hopefully past the election. The strategy is to destroy American's faith in the justice system‚ so that whatever the result of these trials‚ Donald Trump can dismiss them or say that they're phony just like he tried to do with the election. And that's why you hear him saying election interference‚ voter intimidation. You know‚ he is casting this as if the justice system itself is on trial‚ not him. (…) 12:21:09 p.m. Eastern MITCHELL: Now‚ he's also said‚ while we were talking just now‚ that this is a case of clear election interference and voter intimidation‚ that this decision today is something he will appeal. And he said that this is a case that could have been brought three and a half years ago‚ and they're now fighting over days. This is election interference. Of course‚ a lot of the delay in bringing the case‚ at least under‚ you know‚ prosecutor Bragg‚ not the previous investigation‚ had to do with the delays caused by all of the defense motions. (…)