Unlike Jon Stewart, Jimmy Kimmel Live! guest host Martin Short did not react to Thursday’s Trump-Biden debate live, and from the perspective of ABC’s liberal audience, maybe that was a good thing because Short’s previously recorded rendition of Cranky Doodle, mocking Trump, would help them cope with Biden’s bad performance. Short hosted as his character Jiminy Glick and mocked some Trump supporters’ priorities, “Why does Jimmy Kimmel have to be so one-sided? Why not talk about the issues that really matter? Like Hillary's emails, Benghazi, deep state Pizzagate. And where is Hunter? I'll tell you where! Having a threesome with Antifa and Taylor Swift.”     Keeping with the sarcasm, Short pretended to lament, “Jimmy's always punching down on Mr. Trump. But tonight, I want to lift him up—with a musical salute to a man whose only crime is trying to make America great again, again.” Short then launched into a parody of Yankee Doodle complete with an Uncle Sam hat, on screen lyrics, and related images: Cranky Doodle went to town to call the news a phony. Stuck white letters on red hats and called it MAGA-roni. Cranky Doodle you're so tan, Cranky Doodle Dandy. Stop the steal and lock her up and with the girls be handsy. Cranky Doodle won't concede ´cause they rigged the election so they stormed the Capitol ´twas hardly insurrection. Cranky Doodle you're so smart, windmills do cause cancer, you're a stable genius and a very sexy dancer. Cranky Doodle went to court to fight a crooked system, is it really Donald's fault that Stormy can't resist him. Cranky Doodle drained the swamp, got rid of all the leakers, built a mighty border wall in glitzy golden sneakers. Cranky Doodle make us great, be the one who frees us, you're our bigly Burger King, our sweet Orange baby Jesus.  Cranky Doodle has our vote, by your side we're standin' go and take the White House back and we'll shout let's go Brandon. Go and take the White House back and we'll shout let's go Brandon.  As Short concluded, Kimmel’s sidekick, Guillermo Rodriguez, joined him on stage waving an American flag in a bald eagle costume while confetti streamers fell from the ceiling. Unfortunately for Short and his viewers, voters are more likely to make their decisions based on the debate than a parody song, and the sugar high of such a song will quickly wear off. Here is a transcript for the June 27 show: ABC Jimmy Kimmel Live! 6/27/2024 11:41 PM ET MARTIN SHORT [AS JIMINY GLICK]: Why does Jimmy Kimmel have to be so one-sided? Why not talk about the issues that really matter? Like Hillary's emails, Benghazi, deep state Pizzagate. And where is Hunter? I'll tell you where! Having a threesome with Antifa and Taylor Swift.  And Jimmy's always punching down on Mr. Trump. But tonight, I want to lift him up —with a musical salute to a man whose only crime is trying to make America great again, again.  Cranky Doodle went to town to call the news a phony. Stuck white letters on red hats and called it MAGA-roni. Cranky Doodle you're so tan, Cranky Doodle Dandy Stop the steal and lock her up and with the girls be handsy. Cranky Doodle won't concede ´cause they rigged the election so they stormed the Capitol ´twas hardly insurrection. Cranky Doodle you're so smart, windmills do cause cancer, you're a stable genius and a very sexy dancer. Cranky Doodle went to court to fight a crooked system, is it really Donald's fault that Stormy can't resist him. Cranky Doodle drained the swamp, got rid of all the leakers, built a mighty border wall in glitzy golden sneakers. Cranky Doodle make us great, be the one who frees us, you're our bigly Burger King, our sweet Orange baby Jesus.  Cranky Doodle has our vote, by your side we're standin' go and take the White House back and we'll shout let's go Brandon. Go and take the White House back and we'll shout let's go Brandon. 

Matt Taibbi, independent journalist and Twitter Files author, revealed the origins of the expansive government censorship enterprise working with social media to censor Americans. Taibbi recounted his findings from the Twitter Files in a new interview with Tucker Carlson released Thursday. During the 2-hour long interview, Taibbi revealed the origins of the Global Engagement Center, a State Department initiative first implemented overseas to combat jihadist terrorists that is now being used to target US citizens. Taibbi described the scope of his findings revealing that the US government was working hand in glove with social media companies to violate the Bill of Rights. “There was a group of us and for about three months, we got to look through the internal correspondence of one of the world’s biggest communications companies, and the big thing that we found was that there was this nexus of communication between government enforcement and intelligence agencies and the internet platforms,” Taibbi said. “And they had a very sophisticated and organized bureaucracy that was involved with controlling content in a variety of different ways.” Taibbi’s team was shocked at what they uncovered and were very curious as to how such a sophisticated apparatus could be implemented at home seemingly under the nose of the American public.  “First of all, this was shocking to us seeing all these documents that said, ‘Flagged by FBI,’ ‘Flagged by DHS’ … But we had to figure out, ‘Where did this come from? Like, ‘How did this start’” Taibbi told Carlson. “And when we started asking questions, it turned out that a lot of the programs that were now targeting domestic speech began as overseas, counter-terrorism sort of messaging programs, right?” Eventually, Taibbi discovered that this vast censorship enterprise had been originally started as an effort by the State Department and other agencies to combat international Islamic terrorism. “So, the State Department, for instance, has a thing called the Global Engagement Center, which is now very much interested in speech both abroad and at home. But they were once exclusively a sort of counter-ISIS platform.” Taibbi concluded by talking to industry insiders that after the surge of global populism around the world culminating in the 2016 election of Donald Trump, the foreign policy elite decided that populism was a grave danger to the established world order and must be dealt with. “One phrase really stuck out,” said Taibbi of his discussions with industry insiders. “It was ‘CT to CP,’ so that’s ‘counter terrorism to counter populism.’ And the idea was the whole mission abroad of countering ISIS or countering AL-Qaeda, contracting-wise, it was kind of drying up, right? Because those threats had been somewhat neutralized.”  The foreign policy establishment needed fresh prey, and populism was the perfect target. “But populism was now… was viewed as a very serious threat after Occupy Wall Street, the Tea Party…then there was Brexit and then I think Trump was the last, you know, the last stand for a lot of these folks. ” Taibbi’s comments come in the wake of dramatic developments that could determine the future of free speech in the United States.  This Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Murthy v Missouri that the federal government could continue to collude with social media companies to censor online content. In his dissent, Justice Samuel Alito described the Court’s decision as setting a precedent allowing the federal government to circumvent the First Amendment. “Officials who read today’s decision together with Vullo will get the message,” Alito wrote. “If a coercive campaign is carried out with enough sophistication, it may get by. That is not the message this Court should send.”  Conservatives are under attack. Contact your representatives and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency, clarity on hate speech and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored, contact us using CensorTrack’s contact form, and help us hold Big Tech accountable.

If one ever needed a case study in how the liberal media use their clout to push government spending ever higher, there’s the example of the Affordable Health Care Act, aka ObamaCare. Seven years ago this month, liberal talking heads emotionally denounced a Republican plan to repeal-and-replace ObamaCare, proposing a bill that would have saved an estimated $473 billion over ten years, according to the final Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate. Yet as the bill moved through Congress, the media offered no deep investigations of whether ObamaCare had succeeded or failed in controlling health costs (as many in the media had wrongly claimed as they pushed the original bill in 2009-10). Nor did the media host debates about whether broadly regulating health care was an appropriate function for the federal government, vs. something better left to the states, or to individuals and their employers. Instead, viewers heard a stream of emotional claims about “real people with very real problems” who would be “hurt” by a partial rollback in law enacted only a few years earlier. Republicans were “monsters” like the “Zodiac killer” who would have “the blood of a lot of innocent people” on their hands, the liberal media narrative insisted. Comparing a new bill’s proposed spending level to a fast-growing baseline amount is a dishonest Washington budget trick employed to make any reduction from the baseline seem like a devastating cut. Yet instead of exposing such trickery, reporters appropriated the dishonest language as their own. George Stephanopoulos, for example, lashed out at White House advisor Kellyanne Conway: “I don’t see how you can say more than $800 billion in savings is not cuts.” (ABC’s This Week, June 25, 2017). In fact, the Republican bill would have merely held the increase in Medicaid spending to the rate of inflation; the government’s spending on this program would have increased every year, just not as much as the current law (that they were trying to fix) had allotted. When journalists demonize such efforts to responsibly restrain government spending, while cheerleading for every new benefit proposed by politicians, they contribute to the dysfunctional policies that have pushed the U.S. government’s total debt to a level even larger than the entire U.S. economy (122.3% as of June 27, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis). The media’s protective attitude toward government spending will certainly be an issue if a new Trump administration in 2025 moves to re-set policy priorities after the big-spending Biden years. So, from the NewsBusters’ archives, here’s a sample of how the media trashed the GOP effort to (modestly) curtail health care spending back in June 2017): ■ Fill-in co-host David Muir: “One quick question, Matt, on health care today. Millions of Americans finally learn what’s in the Republican senators’ plan. Why the secrecy?”Political Analyst Matthew Dowd: “Well, you obviously have the secrecy because they think they’re doing something that the American public doesn’t want. It’s as if you walk in your living room and your kids are trying to hide something under the cushion. You know they did something wrong. And I think that’s a real problem.”— ABC’s Good Morning America, June 22, 2017. ■ “On Capitol Hill, police are currently removing protesters in wheelchairs outside of Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s office....[It’s] a brutal image for Republicans and supporters of this bill, frankly....The power of these kinds of images is not to be discounted in this kind of debate.”— Host Andrea Mitchell over images of a small number of left-wing protests being moved out of a corridor, MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Reports, June 22, 2017. ■ “I’m so angry about this ridiculously stupid piece of legislation that is honestly nothing more than a tax cut and a political agenda disguised as a health care bill...There are over 125 million of the 312 million Americans who right now suffer from a chronic illness. Out of that 125 million, 70 percent of them suffer from two....This 125 million people as of today will be as high as 140 million by 2020. And in 2020, they are going to be looking for somebody to give them medication and health care. And what this bill does is sends them all to death.”— Talk show host Montel Williams on CNN Newsroom with Brooke Baldwin, June 23, 2017. ■ “Paul Ryan has been dreaming about cutting this program [Medicaid] since he was sitting — hanging out at keggers in college — he’s told that story. What kind of a monster is he? Who dreams of cutting Medicaid? They act like people are merely takers — they don’t act like they understand hardship of any kind....I mean, the cruelty....it’s the only word we can use — the cruelty of this bill is beyond belief.”— MSNBC political analyst Joan Walsh on MSNBC’s The Last Word, June 23, 2017. ■ “The Senate unveiled their super-secret health care bill....Everybody’s saying it was unveiled. Unveiled? Unveiled is not the right term. You unveil a sculpture. Nobody goes, ‘Behold, a turd.’ This is more likely something that was excreted. I mean, health care bill? More like a manifesto from the Zodiac killer. They should have published this by cutting out letters from the newspaper.”— Host Bill Maher on HBO’s Real Time, June 23, 2017. ■ “If I were him [Paul Ryan’s Wisconsin Democratic challenger], I would tie this health bill...I would tie it to Paul Ryan....I would just bring out what a heartless, soulless Washington creature he’s become. I don’t think the district knows. You’ve made some good points about, ‘It’s nice to have somebody in leadership,’ but if you have somebody in leadership who’s devoted their life to hurting people in the district, let’s think twice about that.”— MSNBC political analyst Joan Walsh on MSNBC’s AM Joy, June 25, 2017. ■ “How do [Republicans] justify the fact that it [ObamaCare repeal] will hurt the people that supported them most enthusiastically during the election?”        — Co-host Charlie Rose on CBS This Morning, June 27, 2017. ■ “You just see the numbers and they are just devastating. There’s no attempt to hide the fact that Donald Trump is breaking every promise he made and that they will have a disproportionate impact hurting older, middle-income Americans.”— Co-host Joe Scarborough on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, June 27, 2017. ■ “[If] you slash $750 billion, Mike Barnicle, from Medicaid, after you’ve already slashed another $300 or $400 billion in an underlying budget, over $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts, that destroys health care in rural America, in Trump America. We’ve said it again, let me say it again, not just for the poor. For the middle class and the upper middle class, their parents in nursing home, their children in NICU units, you name it, it devastates health care for half of America.”— Host Joe Scarborough on Morning Joe, June 28, 2017. ■ Correspondent Adrian Diaz: “The opioid epidemic claimed 4,100 lives in Ohio last year, 308 here in Akron. What would you say to the folks in Washington who are talking about cutting back on Medicaid?”Addict Leah Kohen: “Please, don’t do it. You’re going to have the blood of a lot of innocent people on your hands.”— CBS Evening News, June 29, 2017. For more examples from our flashback series, which we call the NewsBusters Time Machine, go here.                       

Bill Ackman, the billionaire founder of Pershing Square Capital Management, admitted in January that while registered to vote in the Democratic primary, he was "no longer a Democrat." At the time, he had sunk donations into the ill-fated Republican campaigns of former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, and Vivek Ramaswamy and had also financed Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s campaign. While Ackman indicated in subsequent months that he might support Trump, the first presidential debate Thursday night evidently sealed the deal. Trump "is going to win in a landslide," Ackman wrote hours after the debate, which he said was an "indictment of the Democratic Party." "The country should rally around Trump and help him succeed," added Ackman. Ackman suggested that when Trump won in 2016, the outcome had been so unexpected that "he was totally unprepared. The lack of preparation, the Russian investigation and the ensuing chaos interfered with his ability to execute." 'They outright lied to you.' This time around, the billionaire indicated that Trump "knows he is going to win. So does everyone else." Accordingly, the Republican has the luxury of time to "assemble a first class team." In the meantime, the former Democrat recommended that the country unify around Trump, stressing, "The best thing we can do as citizens is support our next president. We need to align the country around our nation's leader. We have grave global threats we need to deal with and challenging economic times fast approaching." When pressed on whether California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) might stand in for Biden, Ackman minced no words: "Newsom would be a disaster. Just look at what has become of the great city of San Francisco. Exhibit A in how not to run a city or a state." Besides imploring other Americans to join him in supporting Trump and understanding that the top Biden alternate is a nonstarter, Ackman also laid into the Biden administration and the liberal media for lying about Biden's decrepitude. "Left wing media have had total and complete access to the president, his staff, and his administration. They all knew, but they told you otherwise. They outright lied to you," wrote Ackman. "People very close to me, my closest family and friends, trusted the media on Biden until the @CNN commentators finally owned up to the truth about Biden last night. For months I have been accused by many friends and family of being misled by an @X-based 'right wing echo chamber,'" wrote Ackman. "The sad reality is that one of our most important institutions, the so-called 'Fourth Estate,' fourth only after the clergy, the nobility, and the commoners, has destroyed any remaining credibility it has." In the wake of its gross distortions of Biden and Trump alike, Ackman underscored, "The media can no longer save itself." He intimated further, referencing a video of White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre hyping Biden's supposed mental acuity, that the administration officials "covering for their boss" have demonstrated disloyalty and and willingness to lie to the American people. Ackman has joined the ranks of numerous other Wall Street executives who, tired of the chaos unfolding under the current administration, have thrown in their lots with Trump. Blackstone Group CEO Steve Schwarzman, among them, distanced himself from the Republican in 2021, insinuating in a statement that the Jan. 6 riot was linked to the president's remarks. However, he closed the distance last month, telling Axios that the "dramatic rise of anti-Semitism has led me to focus on the consequences of upcoming elections with greater urgency." Schwarzman noted, "I share the concern of most Americans that our economic, immigration, and foreign policies are taking the country in the wrong direction. For these reasons, I am planning to vote for change and support Donald Trump for president. In addition, I will be supporting Republican Senate candidates and other Republicans up and down the ticket Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

President Joe Biden crumbled in his debate Thursday with former President Donald Trump in Atlanta, prompting even his biggest boosters at allied news outlets to eulogize his campaign. While Biden's garbled answers, bouts of confusion, and departures from reality were damning enough for the 81-year-old Democrat, his wife found a way to make matters worse. Footage captured by CNN shows former President Donald Trump confidently stride off the CNN debate hall stage following the ordeal. His opponent, however, would not exit unaided. Jill Biden can be seen carefully taking the president's hand and slowly leading him down roughly three steps. The juxtaposition of the brutal debate with Biden's subsequent need for direction and a crutch prompted some critics to speculate about the first lady's real role as well as her silence in the face of the president's unmistakable decrepitude. 'Shameful actions as a wife.' Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) responded to the video, "Who is the Commander in Chief?" Conservative commentator Laura Ingraham noted, "She did this. Embarrassed him, his party and destroyed the country's border and economy by letting him run. Horrible." Former ESPN host Sage Steele tweeted, "Shame on Jill Biden for allowing this to go on for so very long. Shameful actions as a wife. Shameful actions as a human being." Some critics asked whether CNN had accidentally broadcast one of the so-called "cheap fakes" its talking heads previously joined the White House in concern-mongering about. A video went viral earlier this month of Obama having to escort Biden off the stage at a fundraising event after the president locked up in front of an audience. "They are cheap-fakes video," said White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre. "They are done in bad faith." Jill Biden did not promptly escort Biden back home Thursday, but rather to a watch party, where she would humiliate him again, this time in front of a crowd of supporters. Joe Biden spent over a week at Camp David preparing for the debate. With the help of over a dozen current and former aides, the New York Times indicated he engaged in multiple strategy sessions and practiced on a mock debate stage. According to the suggestion Thursday by CNN's Erin Burnett, he might also have received the questions to run through in advance. In light of the investment of time, money, and energy in debate preparation, there was likely some expectation of a passable showing. Jill Biden indicated, however, just how low the bar had been set. When introducing the leader of the free world, Jill Biden said, "Joe, you did such a great job. You answered every question." "And let me ask the crowd: What did Trump do? Lie!" added the first lady. While many critics suggested Jill Biden's commendation of the president for the satisfaction of the bare minimum was condescending, others suggested it was indicative instead of a deluded sense he might actually have done all right — a sense anchored in a desire to hold on to power. Late Thursday night, Jill Biden released a video claiming, "He's the president we need — the president you deserve." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

“Dr. Who” has been a fan favorite for the 60 years it’s been on air, but with its recent record low ratings on Disney Plus — that’s all changing. “Not only is the show absolutely not doing well, but it is failing spectacularly. Like it is doing so poorly,” Lauren Chen of “Pseudo-Intellectual” comments, noting that the “show has been on the decline for a while now.” Since the first episode of the season, fewer and fewer people are tuning in for more. The issues began with the portrayal of Dr. Who — who is now a crossdressing black man — and went downhill from there. “They were so focused on trying to pander to black people and queer people and get them interested in the show, they forgot about welcoming, like, just actual Dr. Who fans to watch the show,” Chen says. “In fact, sometimes, they did the exact opposite. They told those fans to not watch the show if they weren’t happy with being force-fed progressive propaganda, and I’m not even kidding,” she adds. The main actor has told people to not watch the show, addressing his critics in an April 2024 interview with Variety’s Ellise Shafer by saying, “Don’t watch. Turn off the TV. Go and touch grass, please, for God’s sake.” This same sentiment was shared by a drag queen who plays a villain in the show. “I know a lot of people might not even watch this season of 'Dr. Who' because it’s taking such a decisively queer step. However, if they watch, I think they’ll see that we’re just actors playing characters. And if they don’t watch it, then who needs ‘em? I truly believe that for every fan we lose to transphobia, we’re going to have two to three more coming in because they’re excited for trans representation,” Jinkx Monsoon said. “How is that prediction working out for you?” Chen laughs. Want more from Lauren Chen?To enjoy more of Lauren’s pro-liberty, pro-logic, and pro-market commentary on social and political issues, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The National Border Patrol Council, which represents approximately 18,000 agents and support personnel, took to social media in the middle of Thursday evening's CNN Presidential Debate to set the record straight after President Joe Biden claimed the group endorsed his presidential run.During the debate, Biden was asked why voters should trust him to solve the border crisis.'None of this mess was here during the last administration.'"We worked very hard to get a bipartisan agreement that not only changed all of that, it made sure that we were never in a situation where you had no circumstance where they could come across the border with the number of border police there are now. We significantly increased the number of asylum officers," Biden responded."By the way, the Border Patrol endorsed me. Endorsed my position," he claimed.While the debate was still underway, NBPC posted on X in response to Biden's statement, "To be clear, we never have and never will endorse Biden."Biden's comment during the debate that Border Patrol endorsed him may have been referring to the union's lukewarm support of the Senate bill introduced in February. The union referred to the legislation as "not perfect" but "far better" than nothing.In an earlier post, the union wrote, "Biden claimed this morning that Congressional Republicans have blocked his hiring of thousands of Border Patrol Agents. In reality, Republicans have actually funded more agents in recent appropriations bills in spite of Biden—not because of him."The Border Patrol union wished Trump "luck" in the debate and noted that it hoped he would have "enough time to point out all of the ways Biden's border policies have failed."The union has been an outspoken critic of Biden's open border policies that have resulted in over 2.8 million illegal aliens entering the country. In a June statement, the group noted that the number of illegal immigrants allowed into the United States under Biden is "more than the population of Chicago, our third-largest city." The union slammed the president for previously claiming that he could not use his executive power to "fix the abuse of the asylum system.""Now, less than six months before the election, he claims he suddenly has the authority to act," the statement read. "Under his new rules, there is no cap on the number of people who can be let into the country through a port of entry on the southwest border.""At a minimum," the union stressed, "his order will allow almost 1.5 million people — the population of San Antonio — into the country every year. We don't call that a solution!"The Biden administration has claimed that apprehensions at the southern border have dropped 40% since the president signed the executive order. However, NBPC Vice President Art Del Cueto told Fox Business that the White House is not counting gotaways."They can cut the number of individuals that are being apprehended, or that they're saying are encounters, but they can't factor in the gotaways," Del Cueto explained. "You can play with the numbers and that's part of the problem."Additionally, the number of illegal aliens being granted entry into the U.S. through the Biden administration's CBP One application are not being counted as border encounters."That's a different count," Del Cueto told Fox Business. "What we need to remember is, none of this mess was here during the last administration. It became a mess day one of this administration." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Between Biden’s incoherent bumbling and Trump’s redirections — there’s no doubt that the 2024 CNN Presidential Debate was one for the history books. Stu Burguiere calls it “one of the most incredible nights” he’s “ever witnessed,” noting that it was an absolute “disgrace.” “The world superpower supposedly has a man like that leading it. We looked weak. We looked pathetic, and honestly, it was a disgrace,” he continues, before asking Sara Gonzales for her take on the debate. “Well, the country’s over, and I need a drink,” Gonzales says, floored by what she’d just seen. “I feel a lot of anger, I feel a lot of sadness, I do feel a lot of fear watching that,” she continues, adding that “we still have seven more months of this guy not really making decisions but appearing to make decisions.” “The stakes have never been higher for Donald Trump to win this. I am very scared for my country if he does not,” she adds. “We simply cannot afford four more years of this. We just can’t. I don’t know if we have a country left to survive after that.” While the left has maintained that Donald Trump is erratic and should not be handling foreign conflicts — it seems that Biden's cognitive decline is far, far worse for foreign policy than the orange villain the Democrats created in their heads. “I mean, that was the thought and then you look at the state of the world now with all the problems that we’re having, and you look at this guy potentially being the one the head of it, I mean, it’s just, I never have felt more terrified, honestly, for the future of our country,” Stu says. While Stu and Sara are terrified, Steve Deace is hopeful. “I think that it’s way more likely the 25th Amendment is going to get invoked than Joe Biden will be re-elected. There is no way he will be re-elected,” Deace tells Sara and Stu. “Their entire coalition is in existential peril. If you keep him on the ballot, you risk tainting your entire party with essentially going out for the next six months and telling people you didn’t see what you all just saw.” Want more from Stu?To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

BREAKING: The Supreme Court Declares: 'Chevron is Overruled'

Supreme Court Rules Homeless Do Not Have a Right to Camp on Public Property