This is the big one folks… This is the one we’ve been waiting for. As we’ve covered many times before, the reason so many good Americans have been convicted of crimes relating to J6 is due to a twisted, tortured and now confirmed incorrect reading of the law. Nick Sortor reports: #BREAKING: SUPREME COURT RULES MANY J6 PROSECUTIONS WERE ILLEGAL This is a HUGE WIN for the January 6th prisoners! Many will be set free, and hundreds of charges will be dropped. In its 5-4 decision, the court decided the DOJ abused its power and overused “obstruction” charges on peaceful protestors of J6. #BREAKING: SUPREME COURT RULES MANY J6 PROSECUTIONS WERE ILLEGAL This is a HUGE WIN for the January 6th prisoners! Many will be set free, and hundreds of charges will be dropped. In its 5-4 decision, the court decided the DOJ abused its power and overused “obstruction”… pic.twitter.com/hzATNJ2GaP — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) June 28, 2024 THIS IS HUGE! BOOOOM pic.twitter.com/88gD7iAHVE — Gunther Eagleman (@GuntherEagleman) June 28, 2024 BREAKING: The Supreme Court on Friday made it harder to charge Capitol riot defendants with obstruction, a charge that also has been brought against former President Donald Trump. -AP — Douglas Macgregor (@DougAMacgregor) June 28, 2024 It was always illegal what they did…..the prosecutions…..it was wrong from Day 1! BREAKING: Supreme Court rules 5-4 making it harder to charge J6 defendants with obstruction, potentially upending hundreds on cases brought against defendants including President Trump pic.twitter.com/HUzuuohm9K — Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) June 28, 2024 SUPREME COURT OVERRULES J6 CHARGE Huge win for J6 protestors who were given felonies under a statute that didn’t apply to them Now hundreds of J6 convictions need to be reversed Humiliating for the Biden regime and DOJ — DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) June 28, 2024 RELEASE THE J6 PRISONERS NOW! RELEASE THE J6 POLITICAL PRISONERS NOW!!! pic.twitter.com/NQPXMe8Q14 — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) June 28, 2024 The very strange thing though is Jackson siding with the Majority and Amy Coney Barrett writing the dissent: One of the most stunning SCOTUS opinions of my lifetime because of how it was aligned. Wow. https://t.co/YEbQCV5zh3 — Steve Deace (@SteveDeaceShow) June 28, 2024 No one saw that coming. You can read the Syllabus of the opinion here: CNN explains the case also benefits President Trump: The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that the Justice Department overstepped by charging hundreds of people who rioted at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, with obstruction in a decision that could force prosecutors to reopen some of those cases. At the same time, the high court ruled that the charge could be filed against the rioters if prosecutors are able to demonstrate they were attempting not just to push their way into the building but rather to stop the arrival of certificates used to count electoral votes and certify the results of the election. The high court’s decision means that special counsel Jack Smith is likely to continue to pursue the same charge against former President Donald Trump. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion for a 6-3 majority that included mostly conservatives and one liberal, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Justice Amy Coney Barrett filed a dissenting opinion that was joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Roberts barely mentioned the attack on the US Capitol that precipitated the charges, focusing heavily on a detailed discussion of the text of the law. Roberts noted that the breach “of the Capitol caused members of Congress to evacuate the chambers and delayed the certification process.” Roberts argued that if Congress intended for prosecutors to be able to tack 20-year prison sentences onto the kind of conduct witnessed on January 6, 2021, lawmakers would have said so. “Nothing in the text or statutory history suggests that (the law) is designed to impose up to 20 years’ imprisonment on essentially all defendants who commit obstruction of justice in any way and who might be subject to lesser penalties under more specific obstruction statutes,” Roberts wrote. Special counsel Jack Smith has alleged Trump’s obstruction of the congressional proceeding is much more sweeping than the rioters’ actions, dating back to a scheme that began on Election Day and involved the use of bogus electoral certificates sent in from states around the country. Still, Trump’s legal team is likely to attempt to use Friday’s Supreme Court opinion to challenge parts of the case, if and when it returns to the trial-level judge.

I’m going to show you the funniest thing I’ve seen in a long time…. Does anyone else remember Miss South Carolina? She gave one of the best (and by that I mean worst) answers in a Beauty Contest some 20+ years ago and it’s still legendary. From the iconic opening line (“I personally believe….”) it just gets better and better as it goes. She’s trying so desperately to just run out that clock and say as many words as she can think of (“wherefore, such as”) and she’s just trying everything she can to land the plane on that question….and it’s so good! So someone decided to swap out Joe Biden for Miss South Carolina but to leave Trump’s reactions in place. The result is comedy gold. Enjoy: Who did this pic.twitter.com/zP55AIUY5i — ???? ???? ♛ ︎ (@NiohBerg) June 28, 2024 Larger video player: Joe Biden replaced by Miss South Carolina pic.twitter.com/bLDC5O6IaQ — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) June 28, 2024 I only have one question…. And it’s a serious one. Who sounded better? Joe Biden or Miss South Carolina?

This video I am about to show you has not been edited other than putting hilarious music over the top of it. This is how the debate actually ended…. What most of you didn’t see. President Trump firmly walks off the Debate stage like a boss. The camera then pans to Joe Biden who seems frozen and unable to get off the stage, even struggling with Jill Biden’s help as she escorts him off the stage and over to shake hands with the CNN reporters. Folks….this man is gone, he’s shot! Watch here: Shocking ending to the Trump vs Biden debate, what most people didn’t see. This says it all. pic.twitter.com/ryE6qEIdpt — Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) June 28, 2024 Full video player here: Shocking ending to the Trump vs Biden debate, what most people didn’t see. This says it all. pic.twitter.com/ryE6qEIdpt — Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) June 28, 2024

One of the best things about President Trump defeating Hillary Clinton in 2016 was all the great “liberals crying meltdown” memes we go. Do you remember these gems? The great 2016 meldown memes pic.twitter.com/zHvs2dqEd7 — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) June 28, 2024 And: When Hillary Lost…..MELTDOWN MEMES pic.twitter.com/FJgAOqTpRE — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) June 28, 2024 And perhaps the three most famous: Crying liberal meltdowns pic.twitter.com/VZS45e2U3X — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) June 28, 2024 Well, it’s happening again! We just got our first batch of “liberals melting down crying” memes for 2024 and they’re just as good as you’d expect. Take a look: It’s all happening again https://t.co/gZYG3E4M7K — Jack Poso (@JackPosobiec) June 28, 2024 It’s happening again, my friends! In fact, I keep saying EVERYTHING feels like 2016 repeating itself all over again: PBD Agrees With me: It Feels Like 2016 All Over Again! For the last couple of months, I’ve been saying that it suddenly feels like 2016 all over again. Hard to explain it, but the “vibe” right now feels very 2016. I’ll explain more below, but basically in 2016 what was happening? Trump was untouchable. He was teflon. Each attack bounced off him and only made him stronger. That exact same thing is playing out again right now. In 2020, it wasn’t like that. Everything felt “off”. Whether that was an intentional play by the Trump Team to let this “movie” play out remains to be seen. But everything about 2020 was wrong. Not so in 2016. In 2016, Trump defied all “experts”. And that same script is playing out right now in 2023 as we repeat the 2015-2106 cycle. But I’m not the only one to notice it. My friend Patrick Bet-David just posted this: What are the chances of the episode number being 2016? pic.twitter.com/woS3Myis8N — Patrick Bet-David (@patrickbetdavid) August 7, 2023 Exactly right PBD! You get it! Hey by the way, when are you coming on my show? We have to rap!  So much we can cover, it would be a true honor to have you on. Ok, now back to more about what I mean when I say it feels like 2016 all over again…. Start here: President Trump: Dream BOLD Again! Sometimes it’s important to pause and refuel the batteries. The Nation is in a bad place right now… We’re engaged in battles on nearly every front. President Trump is facing an unknown number of sham indictments. Biden has sold out our Country to the highest bidder (literally). And yet…. There is reason to dream big. To dream bold! To be optimistic! And there’s no one better to deliver that message that Donald John Trump himself. Folks, I keep saying this looks and feels like 2015 all over again to me. I can’t explain it other than to say that. Can you feel it? It feels like we’ve just taken that escalator ride down Trump Tower and now we’re picking off 17 Republican challengers on our way to a historic and unprecedented White House victory. So while we’re fighting battles on all fronts, I also can’t help but be incredibly excited for our future and for the historic counter-punch that is about to go down in history. Please enjoy this one saved safely here on Rumble:   Then read this: DIVINE BOOMERANG: Deep Stater Jack Smith Just Bit Off More Than He Can Chew! I keep saying it feels like 2015 all over again! I started saying that about 3-4 months ago and it’s become more and more true ever since. Can you feel it? Have you noticed? What exactly do I mean by that? What I mean is in 2015 everything just kept aligning. Every attack against Trump would fall off him like Teflon but then boomerang back around to take down the person who launched it. In fact, it became so obvious and so fascinating that we nicknamed it the “Trump Boomerang Effect”. In 2019/2020, everything felt “off”. Things were not right. Whether that was all “part of the plan” and “part of the script” or not remains to be seen, but nothing felt right at that time, leading to the incredibly fake and wrong stolen election. But this time around in 2023 as we head into 2024? It just feels like 2015 to me all over again! So much so that the Trump Boomerang Effect has returned! Now many are calling it the “Divine Boomerang”….. I like that name! Here’s the deal… By filing this latest indictment, Jack Smith and his cronies just made a fatal mistake. They opened up a venue for President Trump and his team to now have full subpoena power and to now litigate the 2020 election! You want to see the evidence presented meticulously piece by piece? Now that can happen and Mike Pence and CONgress can’t do a damn thing about it! Divine indeed: BANNON: “This is a blessed day! Divine Providence has once again intervened” Here comes the Divine Boomerang! @DailyNoahNews #Boomerang #Discovery pic.twitter.com/LUxuEbnOOW — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) August 2, 2023 Kash weighed in too…. Look how excited he is! Like a kid in a candy store! Kash on the Trump trial: “I can’t WAIT for this trial to come because the subpoena list that Donald Trump should execute in these proceedings is going to be monumental…. The amount, the deluge, of subpoenas that is going to come out… it’s gonna boomerang. These people bit way… pic.twitter.com/9NfrjqSUGF — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) August 2, 2023 Kash even using the term “boomerang”! I told you, we are reliving 2015 right now, and the beautiful thing is you know how this story ends! Get that popcorn ready, you’re gonna LOVE the end of this movie! Then read this: Melania Trump Steps Out In Stunning New Look It really feels like 2015 all over again to me… I can’t fully explain it, but the vibe is the same. The vibe in 2019/2020 was off. Everything was off. But it feels like a carbon copy of the cycle we went through in 2015/2016 is repeating itself right now. Right down to Melania Trump stepping back into the spotlight and catching attention for her classy and glamorous fashion! Check this out: #Melania #Trump looking so chic! Feels like 2015 all over again, doesn’t it? @DailyNoahNews pic.twitter.com/ZmSjQONd2n — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) June 27, 2023 Really reminds you how far we’ve fallen, doesn’t it? Remember when we had a beautiful, smart and classy First Lady? We will again. From dressy to casual, Melania never disappoints: What is the first word you think of when you see Melania Trump? pic.twitter.com/bqPJM4suR1 — Trump Lover (@SUBRATA30016572) June 28, 2023 Miss her! Bring her back! Make @MELANIATRUMP First Lady Again! #Trump2024 pic.twitter.com/JiTuhNmiIB — Susan Kennedy (@USABookClub) June 28, 2023 Here’s a short but wonderful walk down memory lane of all the wonderful things Melania did as First Lady. Steady as she goes: First Lady Melania Trump Steady as she goes… pic.twitter.com/WmCjkZDilC — Jimmy Falk5 (@JimmyFalk_55) June 20, 2023 100% America’s Best First Lady! America’s Most Amazing First Lady Melania Trump pic.twitter.com/1FupsmW767 — AMERICANDREAM09 Jack Media ~DREAM (@JackMedia7) June 20, 2023 And in contrast, well…. Melania Trump is one of the most intelligent and classy First Ladies we have ever had. Jill Biden is the exact opposite. What do you think? https://t.co/0Mn6SNKrUp — Vernon Jones (@VernonForGA) June 27, 2023

THREE GREAT SCOTUS DECISIONS As reported yesterday, Chevron is gone, thanks to the Supreme Court. Chevron allowed unelected government bureaucrats to legislate from their offices with zero accountability. These bureaucrats were used illicitly by politicians, grabbing power from Congress. The Supreme Court turned it back over to the people. It takes power away from agencies […] The post SCOTUS: Sides with J6, Chevron Gone, Tents Off the Streets appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that the Justice Department went too far in slapping obstruction charges on hundreds of January 6 defendants. The court voted 6-3 in favor of defendant Joseph Fischer, a former police officer seeking to dismiss his charge of obstructing an official proceeding, Congress’ certification of President Joe Biden’s election victory. However, the court ruled that an obstruction charge may be filed if prosecutors are able to prove that a protester was trying to stop the arrival of certificates used to count electoral votes to certify the election results, not just force their way into the Capitol Building. The decision could have implications for former President Donald Trump, who is also charged with obstruction, although special counsel Jack Smith has argued that Trump’s obstruction of Congress’ certification was much broader than the protesters’ actions. It could also force prosecutors to reopen at least some of the January 6 cases. The court determined that the law designating obstruction as a felony was not meant to be interpreted so broadly. The 2002 statute, enacted as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act after the Enron accounting scandal, was only meant to apply in cases involving tampering with physical evidence, the court ruled. Chief Justice John Roberts penned the opinion for the majority. He noted that the “breach of the Capitol delayed the certification of the vote” but said the law never intended for these defendants to be sentenced to decades in prison. “Nothing in the text or statutory history suggests that [the law] is designed to impose up to 20 years’ imprisonment on essentially all defendants who commit obstruction of justice in any way and who might be subject to lesser penalties under more specific obstruction statutes,” Roberts wrote. Fischer faces a total of seven criminal charges, including assaulting a police officer and entering a restricted building, beyond the obstruction charge. “The Supreme Court’s narrowed definition of this statute is a victory against government overreach when it comes to applying vague criminal statutes to defendants and situations never intended by Congress. It is more than clear that what happened on January 6th did not involve document destruction or witness tampering—as the statute indicates,” said John Malcolm, a former federal prosecutor who is vice president of the Heritage Foundation’s Institute for Constitutional Government. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Attorney General Merrick Garland reacted to the court’s ruling with dismay, saying he was “disappointed by today’s decision, which limits an important federal statute that the Department has sought to use to ensure that those most responsible for that attack face appropriate consequences.” A total of 247 January 6 cases could be affected by the court’s ruling in favor of Fischer, but only 52 of those have obstruction as the only felony offense. A total of 27 defendants are currently in prison with obstruction as their only felony offense. More than 1,400 people were charged for their actions on January 6.

In a massive decision handed down that will limit the power of unelected agencies in the executive branch to interpret laws that Congress had left ambiguous, and a power Democratic administrations have used to impose additional regulations, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to overturn the 1984 ruling in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. “It authorized a massive shift in power from Congress and the courts to the president,” Henry Olsen noted of the Chevron decision. “Most of the administrative agencies subject to Chevron are run by presidential appointments. These officials might have subject matter expertise, but their knowledge does not negate the fact that they make inherently political judgments, which the Constitution envisioned would be made by elected legislators.” “Under Chevron, a statutory ambiguity, no matter why it is there, becomes a license authorizing an agency to change positions as much as it likes. Chevron accordingly has undermined the very ‘rule of law’ values that stare decisis exists to secure,” Ed Whelan pointed out. “During Barack Obama’s presidency … courts increasingly relied on Chevron to uphold a slew of new, progressive regulations,” Slate stated in an article titled, “The Supreme Court Is About to Seize Way More Power From Democratic Presidents.” The case in which the Court overturned the 1984 ruling was Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. The plaintiffs, who are fishermen, sued Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo. A subagency of the Commerce Department, the National Marine Fisheries Service, forced the fishermen to “pay the salaries of the federal inspectors that federal law forces them to carry aboard their boats,” the Heritage Foundation explained, adding that the fishermen claimed there was no law that the National Marine Fisheries Service could cite giving them the right to force them to do so. The National Fisheries Service cited the Chevron decision, saying that the law’s silence gave the agency its right to speak. As a result, inspectors’ salaries ought to be paid by fishermen. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled for the Fisheries Service. But in the petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court, the plaintiffs asked, “Whether the Court should overrule Chevron or at least clarify that statutory silence concerning controversial powers expressly but narrowly granted elsewhere in the statute does not constitute an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency.” “Under the Chevron doctrine, courts have sometimes been required to defer to ‘permissible agency interpretations of the statutes those agencies administer—even when a reviewing court reads the statute differently,” the Supreme Court stated. “In each case below, the reviewing courts applied Chevron’s framework to resolve in favor of the Government challenges by petitioners to a rule promulgated by the National Marine Fisheries Service pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Act, which incorporates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).” “The Administrative Procedure Act requires courts to exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority, and courts may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous; Chevron is overruled,” the Court ruled. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP “Perhaps most fundamentally, Chevron’s presumption is misguided because agencies have no special competence in resolving statutory ambiguities. Courts do. The Framers anticipated that courts would often confront statutory ambiguities and expected that courts would resolve them by exercising independent legal judgment. Chevron gravely erred in concluding that the inquiry is fundamentally different just because an administrative interpretation is in play. The very point of the traditional tools of statutory construction is to resolve statutory ambiguities. That is no less true when the ambiguity is about the scope of an agency’s own power—perhaps the occasion on which abdication in favor of the agency is least appropriate,” the Court wrote. “Today’s decision fixes the decades-long error of handing vague and broad powers to unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats,” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) responded after the decision was released. “The Supreme Court’s decision restores the Constitutional power to write the law to where it should be—with the elected representatives of the American people.”