YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #astronomy #florida #nightsky #biology #moon #plantbiology #terrorism #trafficsafety #animalbiology #gardening #assaultcar #carviolence #stopcars #autumn #notonemore
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y

"It's lovely to wake up in the morning and be able to remember why you got punched in the head the night before": Pete Agnew and the continuation of Nazareth
Favicon 
www.loudersound.com

"It's lovely to wake up in the morning and be able to remember why you got punched in the head the night before": Pete Agnew and the continuation of Nazareth

With Dan McCafferty gone and their glory days behind them, Nazareth's last surviving original member, Pete Agnew, cannot imagine life without the band
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y

"It's turned it into a different song." Big Big Train share new recording of Last Eleven
Favicon 
www.loudersound.com

"It's turned it into a different song." Big Big Train share new recording of Last Eleven

Big Big Train will tour UK and European throughout September and October
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 y

Heart-Wrenching Video Shows Man’s First Reaction To Finding Out His Cancer Had Spread
Favicon 
www.inspiremore.com

Heart-Wrenching Video Shows Man’s First Reaction To Finding Out His Cancer Had Spread

There’s never a good time to be told that you have cancer. This is especially true when the cancer has spread to every part of your body, leaving you with no treatment options. When this happened to Remington Beck, he and his girlfriend, Rheanna Beck, were devastated. As the two of them began to process this life-changing news, Remington knew exactly what he needed to do next. Realizing that cancer was going to cut his life short, he decided to follow through with his proposal plans. He already had a ring and everything — he had just been waiting for the perfect time to ask. But with not much time left, he knew this was his moment. So, in a video, we can see the very emotional moment Remington pops the question. @rheannabeck 03.23.23 the day i heard the words that changed my life forever.. he already had a ring and was waiting for it to be “perfect” we thought we had a lifetime.. we NEVER thought this day would come ♬ These Memories – Hollow Coves It’s clear just how much pain it causes Remington to get down on one knee, but it’s also clear that he doesn’t mind at all. The two of them cry afterward, sharing an embrace that radiates the love that have for one another. Man With Terminal Cancer Pulls Off Perfect Proposal in Tear-Jerking Video As tough as it must have been to know that their marriage would be cut short, that didn’t stop this loving couple from having the best ceremony. In fact, you can catch a glimpse of their big day in the video below. Once again, the love they have for each other shines in the ways they interact. @rheannabeck Eternally grateful for this magical day My Gaurdian Angel #wedding #cancer #angel #love ♬ Whats a soulmate – csbyeol Sadly, Remington passed away not long after the day of their wedding. Even though Rheanna’s time with him was cut short, she’s made it clear that the love they had for one another will carry on. This is the sentiment that’s resonating with so many people on social media. “He might be a chapter in your book,” someone in the comments of the proposal video writes, “but you’re his whole book.” “Some people never get to experience such love in their lifetime,” someone else points out. “I’m glad you found each other.” You can find the source of this story’s featured image here! The post Heart-Wrenching Video Shows Man’s First Reaction To Finding Out His Cancer Had Spread appeared first on InspireMore.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
1 y

Orioles’ Adley Rutschman Left Bloodied After Smashing His Face Into The Dirt
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Orioles’ Adley Rutschman Left Bloodied After Smashing His Face Into The Dirt

Painful AND embarrassing ... yikes
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 y

Virginia GOP Primary Race Between Trump Endorsee and House Conservative Too Close to Call
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Virginia GOP Primary Race Between Trump Endorsee and House Conservative Too Close to Call

It’s still to close to call the winner in a Republican primary contest in Virginia that garnered national attention, featuring a challenger endorsed by former President Donald Trump running against an incumbent congressman and chairman of the House Freedom Caucus At 11 p.m. Tuesday, McGuire held a lead of 50.3% of the vote to Good’s 49.7%, with 96% of the votes counted, according to NBC News. Good ran for his third term representing Virginia’s 5th Congressional District, which spans Charlottesville, the suburbs of Richmond, and through Lynchburg and Danville close to the border with North Carolina. The Freedom Caucus, which Good leads, represents House conservatives. Trump opposed Good, who had endorsed Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in the Republican presidential primary March 5. In that contest, Trump easily defeated his former U.N. ambassador, Nikki Haley, as well as DeSantis, who had dropped out.  In a June 17 post on Truth Social, his social media platform, Trump wrote:  “Bob Good is BAD FOR VIRGINIA, AND BAD FOR THE USA! He turned his back on our incredible Movement, and was constantly attacking and fighting me until recently, when he gave a warm and ‘loving’ Endorsement – But really, it was too late!”  Bob Good is BAD FOR VIRGINIA, AND BAD FOR THE USA! He turned his back on our incredible Movement, and was constantly attacking and fighting me until recently, when he gave a warm and “loving” Endorsement – But really, it was too late! The damage had been done. I just want to MAKE… pic.twitter.com/7eCAnK2kNs— Donald J. Trump Posts From His Truth Social (@TrumpDailyPosts) June 17, 2024 Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., whom Good voted last year to oust, also endorsed McGuire. So did the centrist Republican Mainstreet Partnership.     Good had the endorsements of former Trump adviser and “War Room” host Steve Bannon, as well as the backing of former U.S. Rep. Dave Brat, a former Freedom Caucus member best known for ousting one-time House Majority Leader Eric Cantor in a GOP primary.  I’m pleased to announce, Champion of Freedom and host of “War Room,” Steve Bannon will be joining me and my friend, former Congressman Dave Brat for a rally in Powhatan this Friday. Bring a lawn chair, bring your American flag, and bring your patriotism as we “Rally the Red!” pic.twitter.com/TTcIK1Ggpu— Bob Good for Congress (@GoodForCongress) June 4, 2024 In the November general election, whichever candidate wins will face Democrat candidate Gloria Tinsley Witt, a businesswoman and activist. She defeated Gary Terry and Paul Riley. The Associated Press called the race at 8:19 p.m. BREAKING: Gloria Witt wins Democratic nomination for U.S. House in Virginia's 5th Congressional District. #APRaceCall at 8:19 p.m. EDT. https://t.co/FjgpZFcJ4E— AP Politics (@AP_Politics) June 19, 2024 McGuire, a former Navy SEAL, has been criticized for being in the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, when rioters clashed with Capitol Police as a joint session of Congress met to certify Joe Biden’s Electoral College victory over Trump in the 2020 election. McGuire called Good a “never Trumper” during the campaign. Good has said he considered Trump the best president in his lifetime, but endorsed DeSantis because Trump is constitutionally limited to only one more four-year term, The Associated Press reported. Also on the Virginia front, the primary results will determine who vies for open seats in the U.S. House of Representatives created by the pending retirements of two incumbent Democrats.  In 2018, Rep. Abigail Spanberger won the once Republican-leaning 7th Congressional District, defeating Brat, the incumbent Republican. Spanberger reportedly plans to run for Virginia governor in 2025.  The congressional district spans northern and central Virginia. Retired Army Col. Eugene Vindman won the Democratic primary to fill the seat being vacated by Spanberger. He is the twin brother of retired Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who became famous for his congressional testimony during the first Trump impeachment in 2019. The AP called the race at 8:06 p.m. BREAKING: Eugene Vindman wins Democratic nomination for U.S. House in Virginia's 7th Congressional District. #APRaceCall at 8:06 p.m. EDT. https://t.co/FjgpZFcJ4E— AP Politics (@AP_Politics) June 19, 2024 Vindman had the endorsement of Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who was censured by the House and removed from the House Intelligence Committee he once chaired for making repeated misleading statements to the public.  In the primary, Vindman took on current and former elected officials, including state Delegate Briana Sewell, Prince William County Board of Supervisors member Andrea Bailey, and former state Delegate Elizabeth Guzman.  On the Republican side former Green Beret Derrick Anderson defeated former Navy SEAL Cameron Hamilton. The AP called the race at 9 p.m. BREAKING: Derrick Anderson wins Republican nomination for U.S. House in Virginia's 7th Congressional District. #APRaceCall at 9:00 p.m. EDT. https://t.co/FjgpZFcJ4E— AP Politics (@AP_Politics) June 19, 2024 Also, Rep. Jennifer Wexton, a Democrat, isn’t seeking another term representing the 10th Congressional District in Northern Virginia, just outside Washington, D.C. The Wexton-endorsed Virginia state Sen. Suhas Subramanyam won a 12-candidate primary among Democrats.  Other contenders included former Virginia House Speaker Eileen Filler-Corn, state Sen. Dan Helmer, Jennifer Boysko, and former Virginia Education Secretary Atif Qarni. The AP called the race at 9:15 p.m. BREAKING: Suhas Subramanyam wins Democratic nomination for U.S. House in Virginia's 10th Congressional District. #APRaceCall at 9:15 p.m. EDT. https://t.co/FjgpZFcJ4E— AP Politics (@AP_Politics) June 19, 2024 Lawyer Mike Clancy won the Republican primary in the congressional district, which leans heavily Democrat, defeating Aliscia Andrews, who ran for the seat in 2020. The AP called the race at 7:41 p.m. BREAKING: Mike Clancy wins Republican nomination for U.S. House in Virginia's 10th Congressional District. #APRaceCall at 7:41 p.m. EDT. https://t.co/FjgpZFcJ4E— AP Politics (@AP_Politics) June 18, 2024 The post Virginia GOP Primary Race Between Trump Endorsee and House Conservative Too Close to Call appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Strange & Paranormal Files
Strange & Paranormal Files
1 y

US Energy Secretary admits military involvement in UFO investigations
Favicon 
anomalien.com

US Energy Secretary admits military involvement in UFO investigations

In a recent testimony before the Oversight Committee of the US House of Representatives, US Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm acknowledged the involvement of military special forces in investigating unidentified flying objects (UFOs) near nuclear facilities. This revelation came during a pointed exchange with Representative Anna Paulina Luna on May 23. Luna initially inquired whether the Department of Energy (DoE) had engaged federal counter-terrorism personnel in these investigations. Granholm’s initial response was evasive, but upon further pressing, she confirmed the DoE’s collaboration with the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC). “Yes, we do,” Granholm eventually admitted when asked directly by Luna about the DoE’s cooperation with JSOC. Granholm’s testimony also included references to UFOs, now formally termed unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs), being identified as drones around critical US infrastructure. When Luna brought up reports of similar sightings dating back to the 1940s, Granholm promised to follow up, indicating no immediate response. Granholm also denied any knowledge of efforts to reverse-engineer technology from UFOs. This admission is significant because JSOC’s involvement suggests high-level security measures and potential interest in the technological aspects of these phenomena. UFO expert Jeremy Corbell emphasized the importance of this acknowledgment, noting JSOC’s reputed role in the retrieval and study of alien technology. The exchange highlighted the ongoing complexity and secrecy surrounding the US government’s handling of UAPs. While the term UFO commonly invokes images of extraterrestrial craft, it broadly refers to any aerial object of unknown origin. The post US Energy Secretary admits military involvement in UFO investigations appeared first on Anomalien.com.
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

Column: The 'Cheapfake' Video Claims of Pro-Biden Bedwetters
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Column: The 'Cheapfake' Video Claims of Pro-Biden Bedwetters

President Biden’s greatest personal vulnerability in his re-election campaign is the perception that he’s mentally deteriorating and won’t be able to finish a second term (when he’d be 86). So it’s not surprising that the pro-Biden media are feverishly defending Biden when videos suggest he might be losing it. They’re clearly pre-dreading the presidential debate. In April, a Pew Research Center poll showed 65 percent had little or no confidence in Biden’s physical fitness as president, and 62 percent said the same for mental fitness. A recent ABC News/Ipsos poll showed voters preferred Trump 42-23 on “mental sharpness.” This deeply upsets leftist journalists, who insisted President Trump was mentally unstable on a regular basis when Trump was in the White House. But now that Republicans are spreading videos of Biden looking like a failing geezer, they’re all furiously “fact checking” and throwing “Pinocchios.” Start with a video from a skydiving demonstration at the G-7 summit in Italy. Biden appeared to be wandering away from European leaders to look at something behind him. It turns out he was giving two thumbs-up to a skydiver behind him. But what everyone saw was the leaders of Italy and France trying to discreetly rush and turn Biden around for photographs. It looked like they had “orders” to keep Grandpa on track.   PolitiFact claimed it was “False” to say Biden “wandered off” (the cheeky New York Post headline was “Meander In Chief”). Washington Post “fact checker” Glenn Kessler’s article carried the hot headline “‘Cheapfake’ Biden videos enrapture right-wing media, but deeply mislead.” Kessler could have awarded Two Pinocchios (“Significant omissions and/or exaggerations”) but careened into ruling Four Pinocchios, for “Whoppers.” This isn’t fact-checking. It’s spin-spoiling. “Morning Joe” spent several days raging against the G-7 video, with Mika Brzezinski quoting a distraught Democrat strategist: “The lie sprinting the 100-meter dash and the fact check is taking a stroll on the beach.” Watching European leaders try to “rescue” Biden from meandering is now a “lie.” Mika and Joe didn’t touch video of Barack Obama grabbing Biden’s wrist to lead him off stage at a Hollywood fundraiser. TV networks and video producers love to make political trouble over bad “optics.” It’s obvious too much can be made of video clips. Too much can be made of verbal stumbles. Watching how someone slurps on their bottled water can only mean so much. But wow, all the media shoes have switched to the other feet. Four years ago – on June 13, 2020 -- President Trump tentatively tiptoed down a ramp at the Air Force Academy commencement, leading to an anti-Trump feeding frenzy of “growing health concerns.” On one day (June 15), NewsBusters found CNN and MSNBC spent nearly 51 minutes analyzing the video with medical experts and trying to inflict damage on perceptions of Trump’s fitness. Now with Biden, MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace decried “a growing and insidious trend in right-wing media” to take “highly misleading and selectively edited video” of Biden and question his fitness. But four years ago, Wallace offered entirely the opposite spin – 12 and a half minutes on June 15, 2020 raising questions about Trump’s tiptoeing, trolling for “any [conspiracy] theories about why he went to the hospital earlier this year and any connection between his struggle to hold a water glass with one hand, and that walk down the ramp?” This is not a double standard. It’s simply a Democrat standard. Sing consistently from the DNC song sheet. This is the sound of left-wing cable “news.”
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 y

Blaze News original: Understanding hell — Part III
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Blaze News original: Understanding hell — Part III

Hell has long had a hold on the Western imagination. Middle Age scribes rendered depictions of hell strikingly similar both to those painted centuries later by Renaissance greats and to those photoshopped nearly a millennium later by keyboard-bound game designers. It has served as an unnerving backdrop in Hollywood features, medieval passion plays, early modern poetry, and graphic novels alike. Despite hell's sustained cultural influence, its hold has slipped in the way of belief among Americans. Meanwhile, others, religious and secular alike, maintain that it is a thing of cruel fantasy or, alternatively, a kindness misunderstood. In Parts I and II, a number of faith leaders and scholars shared with Blaze News their views on hell. These perspectives ranged from the Roman Catholic belief that hell is a place of eternal torment inhabited by those resistive to God's love and grace, to a Jewish perspective that hell is a kind of "spiritual washing machine" that prepares most souls for paradise. In what follows are two contrastive views on the matter: the first from a conservative Presbyterian who believes there indeed exists a place of eternal punishment for the wicked after death, and the second from a progressive liberal who does not believe in hell but maintains that the truly wicked run the risk of being forgotten or possibly stricken from existence. While they each have emphasized different consequences in and beyond the land of the living, both individuals noted the importance of taking action in the here and now. Erick Erickson Erick Erickson is a writer, a columnist, and the host of "The Erick Erickson Show" on 95.5 WSB. Erickson received his law degree from Mercer University's Walter F. George School of Law and practiced for six years, primarily at Sell & Melton LLP. Erickson subsequently served as editor in chief at RedState.com for a decade, as a political contributor at both CNN and Fox News for several years, and as a city councilman for Macon, Georgia. Erickson, a proud member of the Presbyterian Church in America who has started on a theology degree at Reformed Theological Seminary, has a book out later this month entitled, "You Shall Be as Gods: Pagans, Progressives, and the Rise of the Woke Gnostic Left," which explores the longstanding conflict between the Christian church today and paganism. In his phone interview with Blaze News, Erickson minced no words about the reality of hell and the torments that await those who have rejected Christ. However, he emphasized that it is not by the cruelty of God that some men are damned but by His love and mercy that they could ever be saved.Real and everlasting Erickson indicated at the outset that the Presbyterian Church of America follows the Westminster Confession of Faith, which was produced by the Westminster Assembly during the English Civil War and completed in 1646. The Westminster Confession affirms that the Bible in its original languages is pure and remains the infallible source of doctrinal authority for Christian faith. The document is also unmistakably clear about Presbyterian beliefs in the afterlife — as was Erickson. 'Those who are separated from God will be there eternally.' "Yes, hell is real, and it is eternal," said Erickson. "It is a physical place" where the devil, the demons, and the damned all ultimately go. The conservative host noted that after the day of judgment, "Those who are separated from God will be there eternally" immediately upon dying. There is no transitional period or purgatorial state getting in the way of damned souls' encounter with final consequence. In terms of its relation in time and space to heaven, Erickson noted that "whether we view it as inside or outside the gates of heaven, there is some physical location outside the realm of God where those who are not of the kingdom of God will go." Apathy be damned The Westminster Confession states, "By the decree of God, for the manifestation of his glory, some men and angels are predestinated unto everlasting life, and others fore-ordained to everlasting death." When asked about this belief that God predestines some souls to hell, Erickson indicated that Presbyterians and Calvinists believe "there are those God elected to save and all others not to save." 'God clearly wants a relationship with us.' Erickson indicated that "if you desire to be with God, then you're among the elect. If you have no interest or desire, then you're not." "God clearly wants a relationship with us. He sent Jesus to live a perfect life in this world, to try to call everyone to Him," said Erickson. "I definitely think there is a portion of the people who reject God who, through their own stubbornness, wind up there." While some Christians might find the idea of predestination difficult to digest, Erickson alternatively indicated, "I have a hard time understanding why we get to heaven. I mean, I'm amazed by God's love to allow us, knowing all of the sins of my life." Once saved, always saved To avoid hell, actions aren't going to cut it. After all, no one is good enough on their own merit — either for heaven or to pay back the sacrifice at Golgotha. The key, stressed Erickson, is faith in Jesus Christ. Such is the way of salvation. Blaze News asked Erickson whether people who genuinely have faith in Christ could jeopardize their salvation and guarantee a fast-track to hell through some misstep in word or deed. 'If you put your faith in Christ and trust Him, you can't be snatched away from Him.' "So, the 'once saved, always saved,' is something a lot of evangelicals would say; that if you are saved, you can't be snatched away from Christ," said Erickson. "Whether or not you are saved — you may think you are and you're not — that's between you and God, not for me to decide. But the general rule is, if you put your faith in Christ and trust Him, you can't be snatched away from Him." Whereas other denominations might be less committal in their responses, Erickson indicated that those who do not accept Christ, including nonbelievers, are precluded from going to heaven and thereby consigned to hell. This is cause, he acknowledged, for Christians to proselytize. "I think a lot of denominations that believe in predestination and the doctrine of election are asked, 'Well, why bother doing these things if God's got it and the Holy Spirit's in charge?'" said Erickson. "We are instruments of God's will, and we are called to evangelize, and Christ tells us in the Great Commission to preach, teach, and baptize in His name." Erickson suggested that hell is likely not egalitarian in the way of the punishments. Accordingly, those unfortunate enough to wind up there having never before heard of Christ won't suffer to the extent of a truly wicked person for all time. "I don't know that I would say it's PCA because we don't get into it a lot," said Erickson, "[but] I do think that there are levels of separation from God. Those who do terrible things are punished more than those who just never knew Christ." Just as Dante figured the great minds of antiquity would be stuck in the first circle of Dante's hell, Erickson suggested that there may be gradations of suffering and that such people may just experience "an absence of God as opposed to active punishment." Downplaying the depths Blaze News asked Erickson about the efforts by some denominations to downplay the existence of hell. The conservative host indicated that in doing so, they effectively water down Christ's own teachings. 'Christ Himself didn't speak in red letters.' "I think Jesus Himself spoke more about hell than anyone else in Scripture and for any denomination to downplay hell is downplaying a significant portion of the things Christ talked about," said Erickson. "I mean, there is an aspect of some Christian denominations that take a red-letter view — that they only pay attention to the red letters in the New Testament, which some editor centuries ago put in," continued Erickson. "Christ Himself didn't speak in red letters, but within those red letters are a lot of discussions of hell, damnation, and judgment. So, to be dismissive of that is to be dismissive of a whole lot of what Christ talked about." Erickson acknowledged a possible correlation between the narrative elimination of the possibility of hell and the laxation of morals, noting that "'secular, secularism,' translated actually means 'nowism'; that only the here and now matters. And there is a lot of that, I think, that even creeps into the church to be so focused on the here and now that we forget about eternity." Besides possibly impacting public morality, the effort to discount the existence of hell also has theological implications. "You know Tim Keller, one of the more famous PCA pastors, before he passed away said, 'Unless you accept that the devil and hell were real, a lot of Scripture doesn't make sense.'" The story of salvation, too, would be undercut by the notion there is no hell. "Why do we need to be saved if there is no eternal punishment?" said Erickson. Additionally, there is a comfort in recognizing hell's existence. After all, oftentimes evildoers escape justice in the temporal realm. "The doctrine of hell gives me comfort that there are those who are terrible people who will get away with terrible things in this lifetime, but they'll never escape judgment," Erickson told Blaze News. "I wouldn't want to believe in a God that could look on the horrors of this world and say, 'Well, that guy gets in too.'" While Erickson expressed uncertainty about whether a broader belief in hell might yield social benefits today, he said it certainly helps people of faith, affording them "some level of calibration to, I think, be empathetic to those who are not saved; to understand that this is the best they're going to have; and to be relational and perhaps save those who otherwise would not be with you in heaven." Rabbi Shana Goldstein Mackler Rabbi Shana Goldstein Mackler has been serving for 20 years as a rabbi at the Temple, Congregation Ohabai Sholom in Nashville, where she is now also a senior scholar. Rabbi Mackler, a teacher at the Hebrew Day School of Central Florida, was voted one of America's Most Inspiring Rabbis in 2016 and is both a founding member of the West Nashville Interfaith Clergy Group and president of the Nashville Board of Rabbis. She and her husband, Army veteran Lt. Col. James Mackler, are the proud parents of two daughters. At the outset, Rabbi Mackler clarified to Blaze News over the phone that a distinguishing feature of Reform Judaism, of which she is an exponent, when it comes to ritual laws, "Reformed Judaism feels guided by the ritual commandments and the more orthodox feels governed by them." Heaven on earth and hell in question Rabbi Mackler emphasized that Jewish views on the afterlife and the possibility of hell differ wildly: "For as many Jews as there are in the world, there's probably that many opinions on the afterlife." "The texts in virtually every era of Jewish life have some sort of concept of a world where people go when they die. In the Bible, there is this concept of Sheol. It's not very specific," said Rabbi Mackler. "It takes on different names through our rabbinic tradition (e.g., 'Shamayim'), which comes about after the Hebrew Bible was closed." 'We don't focus as much on the next life as we do on this life.' A lack of textual specificity and the emergence of various interpretations have apparently all but guaranteed the impossibility of consensus, but there appears to be little urgency given the Jewish focus on the here and now as opposed to the hereafter, suggested Rabbi Mackler. "We don't focus as much on the next life as we do on this life so the concept of that as a reward or punishment is not really the focus of Jewish practice," said the rabbi. "Most of us focus on trying to make whatever our concept of paradise is here on earth." As for hell, individuals may try to generate pockets of it on earth, but Rabbi Mackler indicated there's no such place awaiting us after death. 'We don't have fire and brimstone.' "We do not have a concept of hell," said Rabbi Mackler. "We don't have the devil. We don't have fire and brimstone. We don't have any of that. That's not our concept at all. So, I think that's a big difference for us: We just don't have that form of punishment." There is, however, a minority of Reform Jews — perhaps even among her congregation — who believe otherwise. An appetite whetted for justice Rabbi Mackler indicated that over time and through acculturation, particularly when living in diaspora, some Jews have adopted views on the afterlife that may be more recognizable to mainstream Christians. "Everywhere we went, we were influenced by the people among whom we lived. And so some of the concepts like the Hellenistic concept of Hades — those kind of things you can see finding their way into some literature at some point in time," Rabbi Mackler told Blaze News. "I would say that because hell is very much a [popular] concept in our modern life ... it makes its way into someone's psyche, regardless of their religious focus." Rabbi Mackler noted that these views also resonated with concepts already in Judaism, particularly in Deuteronomy, which advances the understanding that the righteous will be rewarded and the wicked will be punished. Bereft of a sense of justice in this world, the rabbi noted that the desire for an afterlife became all the more appealing. "We see lots of things where the wicked people get success or they get elevated or they get famous or whatever the benefit is that they're seeking, and righteous people suffer. So, I think there was a question, and Job actually ultimately asked the question, 'Why do righteous people suffer?'" said Rabbi Mackler. "I think the idea of the world to come was an avenue for that to be worked out." "So, if it didn't happen in our lifetime for the righteous to be rewarded and the wicked to be punished, I think that was really where it was a need for people to see that for following the rules and keeping all of the commandments that we're supposed to do, it will eventually happen, even though we may not see it in our own lifetime," added the rabbi. The influence of other cultures' views on hell, the biblically grounded promise of justice, and the human desire to see the haughty fall have apparently prompted some Jews to believe in the existence of hell. Posthumous waiting room Rabbi Mackler told Blaze News that while souls may not ultimately face the possibility of hell, some Jews believe in a "sort of waiting period" that souls must endure after death — a "transitional period between the death and maybe the ultimate." "You know, there is a view of resurrection — not everybody believes in that, but it's collective, it's not an individual resurrection; it's going to be a collective, communal thing at the end of days," said the rabbi. "If that is part of their belief system, there is sort of a waiting period to get there." The belief in the existence in such a waiting period corresponds with the practice of praying over the course of the year following the death of a loved one, "which is thought to be one of those ways that we can elevate that soul." Memory and special cases Truly reprehensible individuals could be altogether precluded from joining the posthumous waiting room, speculated the rabbi. At the very least, their immorality could mean their temporal erasure. Concerning the person who renounces God or faith or morality in this world, Rabbi Mackler said, "There is a thought that they would be cut off from their kin. The idea of not being part of a community, of alienating yourself like that; like that's the punishment itself. The worst thing that we could have is not leaving a mark in this world, right." In Reform Judaism — and perhaps Judaism more broadly — memory, morality, and the afterlife appear to be strongly linked. Alienation from the community could mean annihilation in, at the very least, the worldly sense. After all, the memories of the faithful departed are alternatively kept alive in regular prayers. "I don't know if you know but there is a concept called the 'minyan,' like not the little yellow guys," said Rabbi Mackler. "It's a quorum, a number of people that's needed for a prayer. So, when Jews get together to pray, we need that quorum for certain prayers to be said. They can pray alone, but the ideal is to pray in community or to read the Torah, the sacred Scriptures, in community or to grieve in community." "So, that's how memory gets passed on, whether it's out of collective peoples' memory or our individual memories of people," continued the rabbi. "We to this day will read the names of people that none of us knows, but every Friday night when we have our Sabbath prayer, we have what's called Kaddish." "So, we will recite their names on the anniversary of their passing, and when someone dies, we also have not just on their anniversary, but four times throughout the year on certain holidays, we have a memorial service. So, people are constantly being remembered," added Rabbi Mackler. Extra to working against the establishment of a better world, the truly wicked person all but guarantees he will not be remembered in this manner. 'It's like nothingness, right.' "So, the idea that we wouldn't be positively furthering the world — that, in and of itself, not being remembered for our blessing — would be the punishment that we would get," added the rabbi. 'They'll cease to be, perhaps.' Blaze News pressed the issue of what would happen to a truly evil soul. Rabbi Mackler replied, "A lot of people really think about that, but because they don't really have a formed concept of hell, all we could say is that they will not have a share in the world to come. It's like nothingness, right. They'll cease to be, perhaps. I mean, this is conjecture." "The only time that we really know about an afterlife is that people are remembered," added Mackler. "And we say, 'remembered for our blessing,' and so that's the legacy we leave and is how people will remember you. For us, that's the worst of the worst, right." Regarding incentives for good behavior Rabbi Mackler noted there is a concept of acting out of fear of retribution and punishment "in the Bible, the Torah itself, where there are blessings and curses; if you do these things, if you don't do these things." While Judaism contains within it a sense that good deeds will be rewarded and bad deeds will be punished, the trouble, according to Rabbi Mackler, is that behavior shaped by external threats of final rewards and punishments is "not the way that a free person behaves." "That's not the ideal of a free person, a person that's created in the image of God, a person that has agency in this world," said the rabbi. "We're supposed to choose it for ourselves to do right, to do good, instead out of fear of something else coming at the end of our life." Rabbi Mackler did highlight, however, that moral choices nevertheless have real consequences. "The punishment itself I think comes from when we don't have a world we want to live in if we create the curses ourselves by the choices that we make collectively," said the rabbi. "So, I think there's that collective responsibility piece that might be more challenging for me to have this idea of each person having a tally, you know: things that will get them into heaven or things that will send them to hell." In Part I, Archbishop Emeritus Cardinal Thomas Collins details the Roman Catholic views on hell and mortal sin, and Rabbi Aron Moss discusses the "kindness" of hell and the nature of Gehinnom. In Part II, Rev. Fr. Calvin Robinson discusses the reality of hell from a British Old Catholic perspective; Rev. Dr. Lance Haverkamp discusses the Christian Universalist belief that all souls will ultimately be saved, possibly negating the need for hell; Bishop Stephen Andrews provides an Anglican perspective on the darker side of the afterlife; and Dr. Kenneth Green provides historical insights into Jewish views on Gehenna. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 y

Biden's phony numbers mask true economic pain
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Biden's phony numbers mask true economic pain

The official government numbers on the U.S. economy have been contradictory and confusing for quite a while now. What is clear upon closer examination is that federal government overspending and overregulation are doing serious damage to the economy, and we have yet to see the worst results of those policies.The latest government reports show the number of jobs and average hourly employee earnings both increased more than expected in May, though unemployment rose slightly. Consumer price inflation slowed by a tenth of a percentage point after three months of increases.The markets are still absorbing the enormous flood of money from the federal government, which has yet to recede fully.The employment increase seems to contradict recent signs that the economy has been weakening. In addition to the conflicting rise in unemployment, other signs of deterioration include stagnant retail sales, a slowing of consumer spending, weak industrial production and manufacturing orders, increasing consumer debt, depressed new housing starts, falling annual earnings of full-time employees, and rising commodity prices.Consumer confidence rose in May after three months of declines, but it’s still much lower than it was during Donald Trump’s presidency.Any understanding of present economic conditions is further complicated by the Biden administration’s bad habit of reporting inaccurate numbers that make things look better than they are and then quietly revising those numbers later when people are distracted by new incorrect and overly positive numbers released for the next month or quarter. The administration reported for a full month that the economy grew by 1.6% in the first quarter of 2024, then revised it down to 1.3%, a precipitous drop from 3.4% in the fourth quarter of 2023.Remarkably, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell admitted he believes the White House has been cooking the books, stating last week, “You have payroll jobs still coming in strong, even though there’s an argument that they may be a bit overstated.”Even if we take the numbers as given, they are dismal when examined carefully. When employment and unemployment both rise, it means more people are in the workforce and looking for jobs. Unfortunately, as noted at ZeroHedge, “The only job growth in the U.S. is for [illegal aliens], who will work for below minimum wage, which also explains why inflation hasn’t spiked in the past year as millions of [illegal aliens] were hired.”Legally resident American workers saw no job increase in the past year, and unlawful residents willing to accept wages Americans cannot are dragging down wages.With employment conditions for American workers stagnant at best, the job market is another indicator that economic growth is slowing and the Federal Reserve should lower interest rates to reduce its suppression of economic activity. The Fed decided not to do so at its meeting last week, in fear of sparking another bout of price inflation. In March, the Fed’s governors had stated they expected to cut rates three times this year. Now, they project they will make only one rate cut.The markets had already priced in three expected interest-rate reductions for the year, however, suggesting a correction is in order. Even so, the stock markets stayed steady after the Fed’s interest rate announcement, with the Dow falling slightly and the S&P 500 and Nasdaq rising to new record highs.Economist Robert Genetski calculates that the S&P 500 is currently overvalued by 34%. If investors decide the market is near its peak and start selling to take their profits before prices fall, the market could drop significantly.The federal government has artificially pumped trillions of dollars into the economy since 2020, propping up the markets. This overspending continues. In the first eight months of the current fiscal year, the federal government has already accumulated more than $1.02 trillion in additional debt, with a staggering deficit of $348 billion in May alone.Meanwhile, investors reportedly believe the U.S. economy is about to enjoy a significant expansion because of AI: “Hype around artificial intelligence has helped push major stock indexes near records by boosting shares in tech companies, chip makers and even utilities,” the Wall Street Journal reported.The enthusiasm for AI, however, may be more of an excuse for investment than a valid reason. The markets are still absorbing the enormous flood of money from the federal government, which has yet to recede fully. While “the near-term outlook for stocks is mildly positive,” as Genetski notes, the government’s stimulus injection may be waning and the Fed’s interest-rate hikes starting to bite, as indicated by slowing housing and manufacturing production.Higher interest rates hinder businesses from investing in production and consumers from spending on goods that support those businesses. Additionally, the Biden administration has implemented a regulatory program that will directly cost the economy $3.95 trillion in 2025 and indirectly result in a staggering $75.05 trillion in opportunity costs for that year alone. Andrew Langer of the Institute for Liberty writes, “The opportunity costs reflect potential economic activities foregone due to the regulatory burden, including innovation, business expansion, and job creation.”That kind of weight on business activity will reduce the nation’s productive capacity regardless of any hoped-for benefits from AI.The government, the Fed, and the markets appear to be operating on the assumption that the U.S. economy can take any amount of abuse the federal government can inflict. The economic numbers suggest they are wrong.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 y

Americans must criticize our corrupt courts
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Americans must criticize our corrupt courts

In the wake of his conviction in a New York court, President Trump has complained that the process was rigged against him, that the whole proceeding was a corrupt effort to persecute him with a view to influencing the 2024 presidential election. In response, many of his opponents have criticized him for undermining public confidence in our system of criminal justice and thus harming our democracy — a criticism that has been magnified by many in the media.These critics, however, are missing the point and undermining a principle that is in fact essential to preserving our republic: namely, that criticism of the justice system when it errs or overreaches is necessary to preserving freedom under the rule of law.All the proceedings of our justice system are not entitled to uncritical acceptance.Those who founded our nation were aware of this necessity.Alexander Hamilton, representing the defendant in the famous libel case People v. Croswell, warned that “the most dangerous, the most sure, the most fatal of tyrannies” operated “by selecting and sacrificing single individuals, under the mask and forms of law, by dependent and partial tribunals.”“Against such measures,” Hamilton continued, “we ought to keep a vigilant eye and take a manly stand. Whenever they arise, we ought to resist, and resist till we have hurled the demagogues and tyrants from their imagined thrones.” No sensible American would look back on these remarks and think that, by them, Hamilton was undermining democracy.Hamilton’s great rival Thomas Jefferson acted on a similar view. As president, Jefferson pardoned publishers who had been convicted under the Sedition Act of 1798. Jefferson’s course of action here was inseparable from his belief that the law was unconstitutional and that the courts of the United States had made themselves party to serious injustices by convicting defendants under it. Indeed, the pardoning power is included in the United States Constitution, and in many state constitutions, and is used routinely, precisely because prosecutors and courts can make mistakes and sometimes even willfully abuse their power over the lives and liberties of citizens.These dangers are also recognized in federal law. Title 18 of the United States Code prohibits and punishes “deprivation of rights under color of law.” By its very terms, this provision acknowledges that sometimes those entrusted with the administration of justice are themselves guilty of behaving lawlessly and abusively. The United States Department of Justice’s website observes that this provision may be applied not only against “police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards” but also, as appropriate, against “judges, district attorneys,” and “other public officials.” This important provision is itself an acknowledgment by the government that all the proceedings of our justice system are not entitled to uncritical acceptance.Everyone conversant with American history knows that the problem of politicized and corrupt abuses of the justice system has not disappeared in the modern era, that it continues to rear its ugly head precisely when political passions run high and communities are inflamed against leaders for whom they harbor deep animosities. In the 1960s, Alabama state authorities brought Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. to trial on charges that he had committed perjury in relation to his tax filings.This prosecution was a transparently cynical attempt to deprive an important American political and social movement of its most effective leader. In that case, however, even the Alabama jury, composed exclusively of white men, perceived the abusive character of the case and returned an acquittal. Afterwards, Dr. King thanked the jury for its “fair, honest, and just verdict” and commended the Alabama judge for the “high and noble manner” in which he had conducted the case.If criticism of prosecutors and courts is permissible and necessary in certain circumstances, the only important question at present is whether such criticism is justified in the case of President Trump’s New York conviction. Would it be reasonable for impartial Americans today to echo Dr. King’s words and congratulate the Manhattan jury for a “fair” verdict and commend Judge Merchan for his “high and noble” handling of the case?For an answer to that question, we need not rely on Trump or his aggrieved supporters. We need only look to the evaluation of respected CNN legal analyst and former federal prosecutor Elie Honig, writing in New York Magazine: “Prosecutors Got Trump, But They Contorted the Law.”Editor’s note: This article was first published at TomKlingenstein.com and made available via RealClearWire.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 67177 out of 98309
  • 67173
  • 67174
  • 67175
  • 67176
  • 67177
  • 67178
  • 67179
  • 67180
  • 67181
  • 67182
  • 67183
  • 67184
  • 67185
  • 67186
  • 67187
  • 67188
  • 67189
  • 67190
  • 67191
  • 67192
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund