A taxpayer-funded nonprofit organization in Oregon is sparking outrage with its latest initiative. The group, which operates under the auspices of a larger statewide program, is offering $30,000 in down payment assistance to prospective homebuyers—but with a catch. The grant is specifically earmarked for non-U.S. citizens, leaving many American taxpayers furious. The controversial program is run by the Portland-based organization, which is receiving taxpayer money to fund this initiative. The funds are intended to help individuals who are ineligible for federal homeownership programs, such as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients, refugees, and other non-citizens. According to the organization, this effort is designed to address the disparities in homeownership rates among marginalized communities in Oregon. TAXPAYER-Funded Group Offering $30,000 For Non-Citizen (ILLEGALS) Homebuyers In Oregonhttps://t.co/OZ8oPyzthT — Biff Smallberries (@B_Smallberries) August 23, 2024 Critics, however, argue that this program is a misuse of taxpayer dollars. They contend that it discriminates against American citizens who are struggling to afford homes, especially during a time of economic uncertainty. The program has quickly become a flashpoint in the ongoing debate over immigration and public policy, with opponents decrying what they see as preferential treatment for non-citizens. The organization defends its actions by pointing to the broader context of housing inequality. They argue that many non-citizens face unique barriers to homeownership, such as limited access to credit and lack of eligibility for federal programs like FHA loans. The group claims that the $30,000 grants are a necessary step to level the playing field and help these individuals achieve the American dream. Houses for illegalsVARNEY: "A taxpayer funded group is offering $30,000 to new homebuyers. Lauren, you cannot apply if you're an American Citizen." SIMONETTI: "Why wouldn’t an American citizen apply for a taxpayer funded program to get $30,000 for a new home? I mean, it's wild.… pic.twitter.com/Snch0afYKv — Wendy? (@WBVT_98FM) August 23, 2024 Still, the backlash has been swift and intense. Critics, including several local and national conservative groups, are calling for an immediate halt to the program. They argue that taxpayer money should not be used to fund initiatives that exclude American citizens. Some have even suggested that the program may be illegal, citing potential violations of federal housing laws and the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Adding fuel to the fire, the program has also drawn the attention of several high-profile politicians. Republican lawmakers have voiced strong opposition, with some threatening to introduce legislation that would prohibit taxpayer funds from being used in this manner. They argue that the program is not only unfair but also unpatriotic, as it prioritizes non-citizens over U.S. citizens. Supporters of the program, however, are standing firm. They argue that helping non-citizens secure housing benefits the broader community by promoting diversity and inclusion. They also claim that the program will ultimately strengthen the local economy by increasing homeownership rates and stabilizing neighborhoods that have been historically underserved. The debate over this program comes at a time when housing affordability is a major issue across the country. In Oregon, home prices have soared in recent years, making it increasingly difficult for many residents to buy homes. This has only intensified the controversy surrounding the program, as critics argue that taxpayer money should be used to help struggling citizens rather than non-citizens. The post Oregon Group Offers $30,000 to Homebuyers—But Only if They Aren’t U.S. Citizens appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

In a significant legal development, a federal judge has ruled that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. can proceed with his lawsuit against the Biden administration, alleging that his First Amendment rights were violated through censorship. This decision comes shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to reinstate the Biden administration's proposed limits on communication between government officials and social media companies. Kennedy, a prominent Democratic candidate for president and vocal critic of vaccine mandates, claims that the Biden administration colluded with social media platforms to suppress his viewpoints, particularly those questioning the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. The lawsuit, initially filed last year, accuses high-ranking officials, including President Joe Biden, of pressuring companies like Facebook and Twitter to censor content that contradicted the administration’s stance on the pandemic. RFK has been uninvited to debates and is being sued by the Democratic Party to keep him off the ballots. Send a message with your vote this year that the American people deserve to be able to choose their candidate without interference, .pic.twitter.com/CbrK3FjDSW — Consumerfeedback (@Consumerfeedba8) August 22, 2024 The federal judge’s ruling to allow the case to move forward is a victory for Kennedy, who has positioned himself as a champion of free speech and an opponent of what he describes as government overreach. The judge’s decision highlights the ongoing national debate over the balance between public health and free speech, particularly in the digital age, where misinformation can spread rapidly across social media platforms. Kennedy's legal team argues that the administration's actions amounted to an unconstitutional suppression of dissent, effectively turning social media companies into enforcers of government-approved narratives. The case is expected to explore the extent to which government officials can influence or direct private companies in their moderation of content, a question that has gained increased attention in recent years as social media's role in public discourse has expanded. MUST WATCH: RFK’s VP Nicole Shanahan on how the DNC sabotaged their campaign and forced them to be a spoiler. She was a Democrat. “They kept us off stages, manipulated polls, sued us in every possible state, and even planted insiders in our campaign.”pic.twitter.com/aNbiktWDfK — Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) August 20, 2024 The Biden administration has defended its actions, arguing that it has a responsibility to curb the spread of misinformation, especially during a global pandemic where false information can lead to public harm. Administration officials have maintained that their communications with social media companies were aimed at protecting public health, not silencing legitimate debate. This case is just one of many legal challenges related to the intersection of government influence and social media content moderation. The lawsuit is part of a broader trend where individuals and organizations are questioning the role of big tech companies in controlling the flow of information. Critics of the administration's approach argue that the government has overstepped its bounds, infringing on free speech rights by coercing private companies to act as censors. Kennedy's lawsuit gained renewed attention following the Supreme Court's recent decision to reject the Biden administration's appeal to reinstate limits on government interactions with social media companies. The high court’s decision left in place an earlier injunction that restricts federal agencies from pressuring social media platforms to remove content, pending further review. The ruling is seen as a setback for the administration's efforts to combat misinformation, but a victory for advocates of free speech. This ongoing legal battle will likely have far-reaching implications for both the Biden administration and future government efforts to regulate speech on social media. It raises critical questions about the role of government in shaping online discourse and the protections afforded to free speech in the digital age. The post Federal Judge Allows RFK Jr. to Sue Biden Administration Over Censorship Allegations appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

What is it about the Kelce family that seems so darn relatable? Jason Kelce spent 13 years playing for the Philadelphia Eagles. He was a Super Bowl champ, named to seven Pro Bowls, and earned first-team All-Pro six times during his career. That’s all fine and good, but to his three daughters, Wyatt, Elliotte, Bennet, and wife Kylie, he’s just a dad. Jason and Kylie Kelce recently filmed a hilarious commercial for Wawa, showcasing all the helpful things he’s been up to since his retirement. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Wawa (@wawa) “He’s just a regular dad now,” Kylie jokes. She says he spends a lot of time at the convenience store. The video shows him doing “football things” like lifting weights and throwing passes, which all happened to be with Wawa food. Jason loves a “frickin’ hoagie” and packs them in his girls’ lunches. He proudly tells Kylie, “I made dinner,” showing off the sandwiches as he announces, “And I did the dishes.” He smiles as he throws the hoagie wrapper into the trash. Jason And Kylie Kelce’s Commercial Made A Lot Of People Laugh Wawa captioned the video on Instagram, “he’s not a regular dad he’s a cool dad​.” “HAHAHA I really need to see the behind the scenes I feel like it’s the funniest thing ever,” someone laughed. This person loves the Kelces, “The ad we all needed to watch but didn’t know until y’all delivered it!!! L. O. L.” This Instagrammer said they love Wawa, but this made them love it even more. “I don’t need a commercial to buy Wawa hoagies but if you’re going to make one anyways, this is the commercial.”‘ Jason, we love it, and you’re welcome to pack lunches or cook dinner for us anytime, friend. This story’s featured image is by Lisa Lake/Getty Images for Prime Video. The post Jason And Kylie Kelce Poke Fun At NFL Retirement In Hysterical New Commercial appeared first on InspireMore.

True love can be hard to find. Many people spend years looking for that special person to spend the rest of their lives with. When they find them, they hold on tight. And even though everything feels right, some people guard their hearts for a while just to be 100% sure. Celebrity romances are often viewed through a critical lens by the general public. Fans often feel entitled to all the information about their favorite celebs’ private lives even when they want to keep their love lives under wraps. Lainey Wilson, 32, is in a relationship with former NFL Quarterback Devlin “Duck” Hodges, 28. But for the first 2.5 years, fans had no idea.  View this post on Instagram A post shared by Taste of Country (@tasteofcountry) Lainey Wilson Kept Her Boyfriend Quiet On Purpose The country singer told the Taste Of Country Nights, On Demand radio show that she was thrilled to share her life with fans. “It’s really cool to be able to start sharing that side of my life. Cause for a long time, I kept him on the [down low]. I wanted to see if he was actually gonna be around to stay. You know what I’m saying?” Lainey Wilson, who is currently on tour, also stars in Yellowstone. Her career is busy, but she said she and Duck are in this for the long haul, “But he ain’t going nowhere. I ain’t got rid of him yet,” she laughed. And while the pair are madly in love, she stands firm that they’re just dating.  “I think [an engagement] needs to be during a season of our life where we really have the time to like, enjoy it.” Lainey joked that they haven’t had a secret engagement and that if anyone is going to propose, it’s going to be her. They aren’t quite ready for that yet. This story’s featured image is by Featureflash Photo Agency. The post Lainey Wilson Dishes About Her Romance With Her Secret Boyfriend appeared first on InspireMore.

'It was bottom-up'

'They are voters who Democrats have in the past relied on'

'I think she's a center-left Democrat'

Congress attempted to regulate machine guns

Illegal immigrants who the Trump administration deported would be eligible for temporary status

'rhetoric of pro-abortion politicians'