Former “Bachelor” star Clayton Echard is discussing his feelings about winning a paternity case brought about by a previously unidentified woman, who is now known to be Laura Owens.  Owens claimed the 31-year-old reality star fathered her twins during a one-night stand, which he denied.  “At the end of the day, I don’t want her to do this ever again to anybody else… I think she’s shown no signs of stopping,” Echard told People. “I mean, I was victim number four that we know of, and so we felt that especially when somebody commits a crime, they should have to face legal repercussions for doing so.” “Accountability needs to be had,” he said. “It felt odd that this has been going on for a year and just now it’s I guess ended. It was very exciting though, and I was excited to go talk to the other victims and let them know as well.” Court documents obtained by the outlet confirmed that Arizona Judge Julia Ann Mata found Owens “knowingly presented a false claim, knowingly violated a court order compelling disclosure or discovery.” “[Owens] acted unreasonably when she initiated litigation without basis or merit,” the documents continued. “Without an authentic ultrasound, sonogram, physical examination, and in conjunction with a belief she passed tissue in July 2023, the Court finds the underlying Petition premature at best. At worst, however, fraudulent and made to incite communication, a relationship, or both, with the [Echard].” Owens had been accused of similar behavior in the past. The court “determined that Laura Owens has a pattern of similar, if not identical behavior, and court involvement.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Owens claimed Echard got her pregnant after they had a one-night stand, but Echard told The Sun they never had sexual intercourse. The plaintiff further claimed Echard was refusing to take a paternity test. The reality star shared photos of receipts last year which appeared to indicate he had taken the test.  Echard noted that he had the support of his family throughout the process. “I mean, in a weird way, this has been the last year of my life — and not that I wanted to ever go through this — but it almost became a part of my identity for all the wrong reasons and not what I ever wanted it to be. But it’s weird to navigate forward now and say, ‘Okay, I’ll just put this behind me,’” he said, per People.  “Of course that’s what I want to do, but it feels like so many emotions are wrapped up,” Echard continued. “And I think now I just have to be able to take the time to finally break this down in my own head and come to terms with all that’s occurred.”

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas denied any responsibility for himself or for President Joe Biden’s administration, saying “the criminal” was to blame after yet another murder was allegedly traced back to an illegal immigrant who crossed the porous southern border since Biden took office. CNN host Jim Acosta posed the question to Mayorkas directly — after first giving him a little cover by claiming that illegal immigrants were statistically not more likely to commit crimes than natural-born Americans — asking how he would respond to those who blamed the administration. WATCH: Mayorkas denies any responsibility for the illegal alien monster who crossed Biden’s open border in early 2023 — and went on to savagely murder Maryland mother-of-five Rachel Morin pic.twitter.com/zmrZkA9WiT — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 19, 2024 “What do you say to critics who blame the administration for allowing something like this to happen?” Acosta asked. “Obviously this is something you hear in Right-wing media all the time.” “Jim, first and foremost, of course our hearts break for the children, the family, the loved ones, the friends of the individual who was murdered — the woman — the mother,” Mayorkas replied. “Jim, a criminal is responsible for the criminal act. The criminal who committed this heinous act should be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law, and forcefully so. That is my response.” A number of critics noted that, at least in that particular segment, neither Acosta nor Mayorkas appeared willing to mention the victim, Rachel Morin, by name — and Mayorkas appeared to struggle with what he should call her, transitioning on live television from “individual” to “woman” before settling on “mother.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP “Mayorkas calls her ‘the individual who was murdered,'” Stephen Miller posted. Mayorkas calls her “the individual who was murdered” https://t.co/BXUQTH4QjQ — Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) June 19, 2024 “This creep refuses to take any responsibility and can’t even be bothered remembering Rachel Morin’s name,” the New York Post’s Miranda Devine added. This creep refuses to take any responsibility and can’t even be bothered remembering Rachel Morin’s name. https://t.co/MroBHWruBh — Miranda Devine (@mirandadevine) June 19, 2024 Others focused on the fact that he refused to acknowledge the Biden administration’s open borders and how easy it has been for criminals to cross the border and commit crimes in the United States. “They just don’t care. It’s that simple. The border will remain open, people will pour in unvetted, deportations and enforcement will remain nonexistent, and Americans will continue to die. They just don’t care,” New York City Councilwoman Vickie Paladino posted. They just don’t care. It’s that simple. The border will remain open, people will pour in unvetted, deportations and enforcement will remain nonexistent, and Americans will continue to die. They just don’t care. https://t.co/U3C7SiywfT — Councilwoman Vickie Paladino (@VickieforNYC) June 19, 2024 The Republican-led House has already filed articles of impeachment against Mayorkas, accusing him of “willfully and systemically” refusing to comply with federal immigration laws and allege he “breached the public trust” with false statements and obstructing lawful oversight of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

The claim was originally posted by a site that is known for spreading misinformation.

'odds are still in Trump's favor to pull off a historic victory in 2024'

'2024 is the year of the states'

Buggs is being accused of breaking into a home

'Driver took off and was chased down by others, and was arrested'

'I don’t know why you would want to go back to that'

With lung cancer being the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, news of the unprecedented success of a new drug is sure to be celebrated. The five-year results of a phase III trial present the longest progression-free survival data ever reported when treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a single targeted intervention. Called lorlatinib, […] The post Lung Cancer Drug Elicits Unprecedented Results in New Trial appeared first on Good News Network.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. In a statement issued on the occasion of the “International Day for Countering Hate Speech,” UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for the global eradication of so-called “hate speech,” which he described as inherently toxic and entirely intolerable. The issue of censoring “hate speech” stirs significant controversy, primarily due to the nebulous and subjective nature of its definition. At the heart of the debate is a profound concern: whoever defines what constitutes hate speech essentially holds the power to determine the limits of free expression. This power, wielded without stringent checks and balances, leads to excessive censorship and suppression of dissenting voices, which is antithetical to the principles of a democratic society. Guterres highlighted the historic and ongoing damage caused by hate speech, citing devastating examples such as Nazi Germany, Rwanda, and Bosnia to suggest that speech leads to violence and even crimes against humanity. “Hate speech is a marker of discrimination, abuse, violence, conflict, and even crimes against humanity. We have time and again seen this play out from Nazi Germany to Rwanda, Bosnia and beyond. There is no acceptable level of hate speech; we must all work to eradicate it completely,” Guterres said. Guterres also noted what he suggested are the worrying rise of antisemitic and anti-Muslim sentiments, which are being propagated both online and by prominent figures. Guterres argued that countries are legally bound by international law to combat incitement to hatred while simultaneously fostering diversity and mutual respect. He urged nations to uphold these legal commitments and to take action that both prevents hate speech and safeguards free expression. The UN General Assembly marked June 18 as the “International Day for Countering Hate Speech” in 2021. Guterres has long promoted online censorship, complaining about the issue of online “misinformation” several times, describing it as “grave” and suggesting the creation of an international code to tackle it. His strategy involves a partnership among governments, tech giants, and civil society to curb the spread of “false” information on social media, despite risks to free speech. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Free Speech at Risk: UN Pushes for Global “Hate Speech” Eradication appeared first on Reclaim The Net.