YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #astronomy #nightsky #biology #planet #blood #jupiter #brazil #mars #fossil #paleontology #redplanet #dinosaur #conjunction #dinosaurblood #aratasaurusmuseunacionali
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
2 yrs

CBS’s King After Colleague’s Noem Interview: Deportations Are ‘Scaring and Off-Putting’
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

CBS’s King After Colleague’s Noem Interview: Deportations Are ‘Scaring and Off-Putting’

After having taped on Monday and a small excerpt shown Tuesday about two illegal immigrants being the alleged suspects in her purse having been stolen, Wednesday’s CBS Mornings finally unspooled co-host Tony Dokoupil’s interview with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and, while the interview itself wasn’t as hostile as, say, ABC’s Terry Moran with President Trump, it had plenty of bias with analysis afterward. Most notably, there was this from co-host Gayle King: To make sure things ended on a positive note, Dokoupil quickly interjected that he wanted to “thank the Secretary for bringing us down there” for “an interesting conversation.” King dropped her pathetic high horse bit and admitted Noem “was very candid with you” and “answered everything you asked her.” Going back to the beginning, Dokoupil started with a largely positive picture for Trump, a rare move in the liberal media: President Trump won back the White House promising tighter border security and a crackdown on illegal immigration, and those things have happened. Border Patrol apprehended nearly 138,000 people at the southern border illegally in March of last year, and that number fell to 7,000 just a year later, it’s a decrease of about 95 percent in 12 months. Deportation numbers, though, have been slower to change. The voice-overs started off positive as well with the ATV vehicles convoy to the border that, along with being “shadowed by Mexican forces across the Rio Grande,” they saw “little more than sunshine and dust in a region where federal data shows more than 55,000 people cross the border illegally in just one month under the Biden administration.” He first asked her about her forward-facing strategy of going on ride-alongs with immigration officials and going down to the El Salvadoran prison CECOT and if those are all meant to convey a message of “self-deport now or this could be you.”     Next, he posed to her the case of the Honduran illegal immigrant who chose to take her American child with her. Noem said she rejects the notion the administration deported an American citizen. In a follow-up Dokoupil wondered if this is “hardness” of America on display (click “expand”): NOEM: I fundamentally disagree with that. I’m sure that these judges will continue to challenge every single thing that this administration does. We have several activist judges across the country that have made claims such as this, but that mother made a choice for her child and wanted to keep her child with her, so — DOKOUPIL: So, if a relative here in the U.S. wants that child back, and the mother agrees, the child will come back. NOEM: — yes, absolutely, and that’s the process. You know, this mother gave us documentation and fully said she wanted her child with her, and we honored that. DOKOUPIL: Is harshness part of the message when it comes to the removal of mothers who have American children? NOEM: No, I think that with that, with families, we recognize that families can stay together, and so these mothers get the option to take their children with them, which I think is absolutely where President Trump’s heart is. DOKOUPIL: Should those non-American mothers have that option, or should the American children have a right to stay here? NOEM: I think the mothers should have the option to have their children with them, and then if those mothers do leave and choose to register and self-deport, them and their children can come back, or if they want to have their child cared for by somebody else in the United States, that’s an option that they can pursue, too. Following some training footage of Border Patrol special operations forces, Dokoupil insisted to Noem no one is opposed to deporting bad hombres: Nobody wants would-be terrorists or gang members in the country or violent criminals of any kind. Nobody — nobody forgets or discounts the pain of families who have lost loved ones to those people. How do they know that those people on the flights in the chains are actually terrorists and gang members? Noem calmly hit back that “[w]e have spent hours and hours building cases against them” with “the victims that speak up that they have perpetuated crimes against.” Dokoupil continued to belabor the point with the liberal media’s beloved buzzword of “due process.” The rest the show aired consisted of — wait for it — Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Dokoupil wondered “what have you done...to help facilitate his return to the U.S.” and, if not, why not.     Back live, Dokoupil claimed unaired portions made him “wonder, actually, about whether there was any softer side to the Secretary and the administration” (click “expand”): DOKOUPIL: So you can hear what’s tough to discern, because on the one hand, she says it’s President Trump’s decision what to do with Garcia, but on the other hand, she’s saying that they’re listening to the courts, but those statements can’t both be true — NATE BURLESON: Because there’s some confliction there. DOKOUPIL: They’re in conflict. Yes, the courts are asking the Trump administration to do some things that they’ve yet to do or yet to talk about doing. So, you know, all of this tough talk made me wonder, actually, about whether there was any softer side to the Secretary and to the administration. I did ask about the role of heart in all of this, and it was interesting what she said. KING: And she said what? DOKOUPIL: She said, “There’s heart in all of our immigration conversation. It’s about families and it’s about people,” I followed up by wondering, are we still a welcoming country for legal immigration? And her message was yes, absolutely. The idea that the administration has is they have to get through this tough period now, clean up what they see as a big mess from years gone by, and then the door will open again. CBS Mornings Plus featured more of the interview. After Dokoupil made sure to reiterate the administration’s 95 percent drop in crossings from the same time last year under Joe Biden, he asked her about comments from the acting director of ICE that he said showed the comparison being made between deportations and delivering Amazon packages.  Noem disputed this, saying she “wouldn’t do that,” but DHS and its agencies are nonetheless “a professional organization that upholds the law and law enforcement officers and — but we do need to make sure that we don’t want people to be here and be in detention centers for long periods of time.” Back live, Dokoupil told co-host Adriana Diaz that what the administration wants is “make things feel uncomfortable, unwelcome, and insecure for people here illegally or who crossed illegally and here without documentation, because their hope is that they will self-deport rather than wait to get rounded up in some sort of raid.” Asked what else surprised him among topics that didn’t make the air, Dokoupil opined he was “surpris[ed]” by “the degree to which they realize they don’t have the resources for deportations to find, detain, and then go through the process of pushing people out.” To see the relevant CBS transcript from April 30, click here (for CBS Mornings) and here (for CBS Mornings Plus).
Like
Comment
Share
Let's Get Cooking
Let's Get Cooking
2 yrs

HAM, APPLE AND CHEESE QUICHE
Favicon 
thesouthernladycooks.com

HAM, APPLE AND CHEESE QUICHE

This Ham, Apple and Cheese Quiche is a great breakfast or brunch treat! If you love a sweet treat for breakfast, then add these delicious Cinnamon Donut Muffins. They taste just like a cinnamon sugar donut without all the work. Plus, this recipe has fantastic reviews. ❤️WHY WE LOVE THIS RECIPE We love a good...
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
2 yrs

Trump reassigns Mike Waltz to a new post following Signal scandal
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Trump reassigns Mike Waltz to a new post following Signal scandal

President Donald Trump announced that he will be nominating Mike Waltz, who currently serves as his national security adviser, to instead be the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio will serve as the interim national security adviser until the president appoints a new candidate to permanently fill the role. The announcement to reassign Waltz came just hours after multiple reports began to surface about his rumored firing from the administration for his role in the now infamous Signal chat leaks. Given his responsibility in 'SignalGate,' we can expect to see senators apply significant pressure on the nominee during his confirmation hearing. "I am pleased to announce that I will be nominating Mike Waltz to be the next United States Ambassador to the United Nations," Trump said in a Truth Social post Thursday. "From his time in uniform on the battlefield, in Congress and, as my National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz has worked hard to put our Nation's interests first. I know he will do the same in his new role." "In the interim, Secretary of State Marco Rubio will serve as National Security Advisor, while continuing his strong leadership at the State Department," Trump added. "Together, we will continue to fight tirelessly to Make America, and the World, SAFE AGAIN."Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York was originally set to serve as U.N. ambassador and even began to go through the Senate confirmation process. Her nomination was eventually rescinded after Speaker Mike Johnson brought up the House Republican's historically narrow majority. Another vacancy in the House GOP would shrink their majority even further, making it nearly impossible to pass meaningful legislation, especially during the ongoing reconciliation fight. Notably, Waltz was nominated to a role requiring Senate confirmation. Given his responsibility in "SignalGate," we can expect to see senators apply significant pressure on the nominee during his confirmation hearing. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
2 yrs

Blistering racial battle explodes between Ana Navarro and conservative pundit Shermichael Singleton on 'CNN NewsNight'
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Blistering racial battle explodes between Ana Navarro and conservative pundit Shermichael Singleton on 'CNN NewsNight'

For once, Scott Jennings wasn't the focal point of a heated debate on "CNN NewsNight" — and it's a fair bet he had no problem with that, given what went down on Wednesday's edition. This time the combatants were far-left CNN political commentator Ana Navarro — whom we also know as a far-left co-host of "The View" — and conservative pundit Shermichael Singleton. 'Because you’ve advocated for black people, great. Congratulations. Last time I checked, I’m black; you’re not.' The topic was President Donald Trump's deportation policies — but the debate soon morphed into a bitter, fiery racial argument between Navarro and Singleton, with both of them frequently hollering over each other. Anchor Abby Phillip attempted in vain to rein things in, while Jennings and others around the table stayed out of it. But after continued fireworks, Phillip was forced to cut to a commercial as the battle of words between the two raged on. You can view the dust-up here — and make sure to check out the words below that Navarro and Singleton fired at each other: NAVARRO: You know who was here illegally before the deportation order? Marco Rubio’s grandfather. SINGLETON: We’re not talking about Marco Rubio. NAVARRO: Oh, now we’re not? Now, that’s not relevant? SINGLETON: It’s not relevant. It’s not relevant to this conversation at all. NAVARRO: No, I’m talking about Marco Rubio because Marco Rubio used to be an advocate for [Temporary Protected Status] for Venezuelans, and Marco Rubio used to be an advocate for Nicaraguans and Cubans. SINGLETON: Well, I’m not Marco Rubio — NAVARRO: No, I know you’re not. SINGLETON: — and let me tell you my beliefs. If you come to this country illegally, you are going home. Simple as that. We do not have unlimited resources in this country to take care of other people. NAVARRO: There’s a hell of a lot people other than the black people who were brought here as slaves who came to this country illegally. SINGLETON: They are not the same as black people who were brought here against our will. [Illegal immigrants] decided to walk their butts across the border. There’s a big difference. There is a big difference! There’s a big difference, Ana! NAVARRO: That’s exactly what I just said. I said there is a lot of people other than the black people! That's exactly what I just said! That's exactly what I just said, Shermichael! [You] look and act indignant! SINGLETON: It's not about acting indignant. NAVARRO: Yes, it is! SINGLETON: You're acting as if you have the moral high ground here. NAVARRO: You just heard me say that other than the black people who came as slaves there are a lot of people from many countries that came here illegally! PHILLIP: I think you misheard what she said. SINGLETON: Okay. Okay. NAVARRO: No, he purposely misheard it! SINGLETON: I purposely misheard it? NAVARRO: Yes, you did! SINGLETON: Now you’re in my brain? Is that where we're going? NAVARRO: You think [that] I who have advocated for black people my entire life would say something like that? Give me a damn break! SINGLETON: Because you’ve advocated for black people, great. Congratulations. Last time I checked, I’m black; you’re not. NAVARRO: That’s right! I’m Latino, and my people are being racially profiled! SINGLETON: Do I have to remind you the history of my people? Do you want to go there? Do you really want to go on the moral high ground? Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me?(H/T: Mediaite)Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
2 yrs

Ex-NFL player training for a comeback ... while in prison for vehicular manslaughter
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Ex-NFL player training for a comeback ... while in prison for vehicular manslaughter

Former Las Vegas Raiders wide receiver Henry Ruggs III is reportedly training for an NFL comeback while behind bars in prison.A former first-round draft pick in 2020, Ruggs pled guilty to one count of driving under the influence resulting in death and one count of vehicular manslaughter in 2021. Ruggs' accident led to the death of a 23-year-old-woman when he hit Tina Tintor with his Corvette, allegedly with alcohol in his system.The plea deal, according to CBS Sports, resulted in 36 to 120 months for the first charge, a felony, and an additional six months for the second charge, a misdemeanor. Ruggs will be eligible for parole in August 2026 and has reportedly been allotted time while in prison to work out for a potential return to the NFL. Interestingly, the revelations have not come from Ruggs himself, but rather from Green Bay Packers running back Josh Jacobs. The Pro Bowl rusher said he has stayed in touch with Ruggs since they were teammates in Alabama."I still talk to Henry. Henry still calls me. I still help him out. ... We're still connected. I know his whole family. He's from Alabama. He played with me at 'Bama. His momma and them taught me how to bowl. ... Keeping up with him and hearing him talk, it brings me spirits, because he's always positive," Jacobs explained.Jacobs, 27, said that Ruggs has been training in prison and that he has been making calls in hopes of getting help to get in front of some teams upon his release."He's positive about everything. He's training. They let him train and things like that, so I'm like, 'When you come out, man, I don't know if you will get a chance.' I've been talking to some people for him. They've been saying a couple of teams are willing to give him a chance. I'm like, 'When you get that chance, man, you better not, ever, don't look back, and prove to yourself and prove to everybody that one decision don't define you and who you are as a man.'" Green Bay Packers running back Josh Jacobs is advocating for Henry Ruggs' NFL return. Photo by Cooper Neill/Getty Images'He's a good kid. He's never been in trouble. I've never seen him do nothing crazy.'Jacobs attempted to paint Ruggs in a favorable light, as one would expect, describing the incarcerated player as the "breadwinner of the family" who has been changing his family's life."I had some words with some [of his family], and I'm just like, 'Man, y'all got to understand, like, he the breadwinner of the family. He the one changing all of y'all's lives. Everybody.'""And then not only that, he's a good kid. He's never been in trouble. I've never seen him do nothing crazy," Jacobs continued. "He was just one of them guys that have a very, very unfortunate situation and something happened, a decision that he made. That's what hurt me the most. Man, he isn't somebody you would look at and be like, 'Bro, you deserved this to happen to you.'"Ruggs played for the Raiders in 2020 and 2021, recording 921 receiving yards with four touchdowns in 20 games. The 26-year-old also had 11 kick return attempts while with the team.When Ruggs signed his rookie contract in 2020, he was making an average salary of $4.17 million, with a $9.68 million signing bonus.His entire $16 million contract was guaranteed upon signing.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
2 yrs

Sacrificing children on the altar of science: How the COVID-19 response hurt our most vulnerable
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Sacrificing children on the altar of science: How the COVID-19 response hurt our most vulnerable

When COVID-19 washed up on American shores, everyone, including children, were believed by the top scientists in the country to be at grave risk. However, once the threat to children was found to be minimal, children instead became suspected of being “super spreaders.” “Empirical evidence was being ignored, and instead, the officials were following theory. They made up all sorts of contrived reasons,” David Zweig, investigative journalist and author of “An Abundance of Caution: American Schools, the Virus, and a Story of Bad Decisions,” tells Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable.” Despite the fearmongering surrounding schools reopening and children’s status as “super spreaders,” the fact that cases went down in places like Europe after children went back to school didn’t phase the scientists. “What that does suggest, of course, is that children were not super spreaders, schools were not driving the pandemic,” Zweig tells Stuckey. “The point is, the evidence was there that this wasn’t dangerous, this wasn’t increasing cases, and it was ignored, and it was dismissed with these contrived reasons.” While the mainstream media and “the science” was focused on the potential harm faced by the immunocompromised, what they didn’t seem to care about was how social isolation, masks, and digital learning would affect children in the most formative years of their lives. “There is something disordered in asking kids to sacrifice on behalf of adults,” Stuckey tells Zweig, adding, “There is something inherently unjust about that.” “What they aren’t understanding, perhaps, is the incredible harm on so many children, millions of kids, and you have to think about what kind of society, as you said, what kind of society does this to children?” Zweig agrees. “No one was saved by long-term school closures. No one was saved from masking 2-year-olds. No one was saved by barriers on desks and all this other nonsense. This was only harm. No trade-off. No benefit,” he continues. “Even beyond the horrors of child abuse,” he says, which he notes became more prevalent during COVID, “there were plenty of kids who became anorexic and bulimic, screen time skyrocketed during the pandemic and never kind of went back down, anxiety, depression.” "I talked with a lot of mental health professionals for children. Their practices were exploding during the pandemic, and it wasn’t because of people dying, let me be very clear about that. It was directly correlated with kids being kept out of school,” he explains. Politicians like Governor Andrew Cuomo (D-N.Y.) claimed that their hard stance on COVID was only so strict because it was worth it to save even one life — but Zweig knows that couldn’t be further from the truth. “You’re taking one or more lives to ostensibly try to save that one life. It was extraordinarily foolish,” Zweig says. “Toxic empathy,” Stuckey chimes in. “It blinds you to reality and morality, and you ignore the victim on the other side of the moral equation.” Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
2 yrs

Nobody Is ‘Clamoring’ for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, Actually
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

Nobody Is ‘Clamoring’ for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, Actually

From the beginning of his foray into politics, Trump has been profoundly fortunate in his opponents, and, evidently, his luck has not yet expired.
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
2 yrs

Hand the Man a Mirror! Gavin Newsom Is Looking for What Went Wrong With the Democratic Party
Favicon 
twitchy.com

Hand the Man a Mirror! Gavin Newsom Is Looking for What Went Wrong With the Democratic Party

Hand the Man a Mirror! Gavin Newsom Is Looking for What Went Wrong With the Democratic Party
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
2 yrs

She's a PEACH! Ilhan Omar Tells Daily Caller Reporter to Eff Off, Doubles DOWN When Called Out on X
Favicon 
twitchy.com

She's a PEACH! Ilhan Omar Tells Daily Caller Reporter to Eff Off, Doubles DOWN When Called Out on X

She's a PEACH! Ilhan Omar Tells Daily Caller Reporter to Eff Off, Doubles DOWN When Called Out on X
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
2 yrs

'These People Are Insane': Guess What Sen. Tim Kaine Thinks Would Stop the 'Slide Toward Tyranny'
Favicon 
twitchy.com

'These People Are Insane': Guess What Sen. Tim Kaine Thinks Would Stop the 'Slide Toward Tyranny'

'These People Are Insane': Guess What Sen. Tim Kaine Thinks Would Stop the 'Slide Toward Tyranny'
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 70522 out of 142861
  • 70518
  • 70519
  • 70520
  • 70521
  • 70522
  • 70523
  • 70524
  • 70525
  • 70526
  • 70527
  • 70528
  • 70529
  • 70530
  • 70531
  • 70532
  • 70533
  • 70534
  • 70535
  • 70536
  • 70537

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund