Three former Department of Homeland Security employees were sentenced Friday for conspiring to steal proprietary software and personal data belonging to federal government workers‚ according to a Department of Justice press release.Charles Edwards‚ 63‚ the former acting inspector general of the DHS Office of Inspector General‚ was sentenced to one year and six months in prison after he pleaded guilty in 2022 to “conspiracy to commit theft of government property and to defraud the United States and theft of government property.”In 2019‚ Sonal Patel‚ 49‚ a former employee in the DHS-OIG’s information technology department‚ pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit theft of government property. Patel was recently sentenced to two years of probation.Murali Venkata‚ 58‚ who worked in the same department as Patel‚ was sentenced to four months in prison. Venkata was convicted by a jury in 2022 of “conspiracy to commit theft of government property and to defraud the United States‚ theft of government property‚ wire fraud‚ and destruction of records‚” the DOJ reported. Venkata was convicted of “delet[ing] incriminating text messages and other communications in an effort to obstruct the investigation.”All three were previously employed at the United States Postal Service Office of Inspector General. According to court records‚ the men plotted to steal proprietary software and databases containing sensitive law enforcement information‚ which they planned to use to build a software product they would sell to government agencies through Edwards’ Maryland-based company‚ Delta Business Solutions. The men were also accused of stealing personally identifiable information belonging to 200‚000 federal government workers. The trio shared the stolen information with India-based software developers.“After leaving DHS-OIG‚ Edwards founded Delta Business Solutions Inc.‚ located in Maryland. From at least 2015 until 2017‚ he stole software from DHS-OIG‚ along with sensitive government databases containing personal identifying information of DHS and USPS employees‚ so that his company could develop a commercially-owned version of a case management system to be offered for sale to government agencies‚” the DOJ explained.Edwards’ attorney‚ Jonathan Jeffress with KaiserDillon‚ told Reuters in 2022 that his client was attempting to create a better system for the government. Jeffress said Edwards “understands that his possession of the system and the sensitive data within it as a private citizen was inappropriate” and “sincerely regrets his error in judgment.”The DHS-OIG and the USPS-OIG investigated the case.The DHS did not respond to a request for comment‚ the New York Post reported.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

One of the best. The post The iconic moment Mike Patton said Wolfmother “suck” first appeared on Far Out Magazine.

The sounds of rock and roll progression. The post The song sequence Bob Weir called “instructional for me” first appeared on Far Out Magazine.

Not at home on the four-string. The post The Rush song Geddy Lee didn’t like playing bass on first appeared on Far Out Magazine.

Find out if he's coming to a city near you!

Ranch dressing can go on pretty much everything‚ so it's worth keeping a bottle in your fridge. Just how long do those bottles last‚ though?

Currently‚ the reporting consensus seems to be that Biden will order major strikes against various Iranian 'proxy' positions especially in Iraq and Syria. A “decision” has been made‚ apparently‚ with CBS reporting: “Biden tells reporters that he has decided on how to respond to the attack that killed US troops in Jordan.” And Sky News writes‚ ‘Moment of no return approaching’ as Biden weighs retaliation for soldier deaths. Additionally‚ Biden said the White House sees Iran as responsible for supplying the weapons used in the drone strike on the Tower 22 base along the Jordan-Syria border‚ an attack which also saw over 40 American troops injured. Admin officials have repeatedly asserted they do not seek wider war with Iran‚ even while direct accusations fly against Tehran‚ and there’s talk of military ‘options’ and warlike threats go over the airwaves. …because “pressure‚” writes Bloomberg: “US President Joe Biden faces intensifying pressure to confront Iran directly after the country’s proxies killed three American soldiers in a drone strike in Jordan over the weekend‚ risking precisely the wider regional conflict that he’s trying to avoid.” “A person familiar with the US position‚ who asked not to be identified discussing private discussions‚ said it was clear that a strike — which also wounded at least 34 — would force a stronger response than what the US has done so far in the weeks‚” continues Bloomberg.Introducing Next Level Foundational Energy from Dr. Jones Naturals starting at 30% off! This cutting-edge dietary supplement is designed to elevate your energy levels and support your overall well-being. Currently‚ the reporting consensus seems to be that Biden will order major strikes against various Iranian ‘proxy’ positions especially in Iraq and Syria. In the immediate aftermath of the Sunday drone attack on the US Tower 22 base‚ there were reports that Iran-aligned militias were temporarily evacuating bases in the region. Biden on the White House lawn Tuesday: “I do hold them [Iran] responsible in the sense that… BREAKING: President Biden says he has made a decision on how to respond to the drone attack in Jordan and that he holds Iran responsible. pic.twitter.com/uR1Jhdzy03— MSNBC (@MSNBC) January 30‚ 2024 US and coalition forces could at the same time launch another major round of airstrikes against Houthi positions in Yemen‚ amid continued targeting of Red Sea shipping. The only question that remains is timing… when will the bombs fly? At this point it’s a certainty. A proverbial “moment of no return” is fast approaching. Historians could look back on this pivotal moment and see it as the point at which the Gaza war spiraled into a broader Middle East enduring conflict. Tragic as any loss of American life is‚ one regional analyst points out the following sure to be unpopular truth… If you’re a superpower that can’t suffer an average rate of one dead soldier per 38 days of intense regional conflict without behaving like you’ve arrived at a 9/11-type decision point‚ maybe massive military entanglements in the Middle East are not for you? This gets at an asymmetry between the U.S. and its regional adversaries that advantages the latter‚ and regularly frustrates U.S. efforts to establish deterrence: these groups are weaker‚ but they have a sky-high pain tolerance.They’re from here! They have people ready to die! https://t.co/9hmm7Gq77P— Sam Heller | سام هيلر (@AbuJamajem) January 30‚ 2024 Meanwhile‚ Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Nasser Kanaani has denied that Tehran was behind the drone strike and killing of Americans: “As we have clearly stated before‚ the resistance groups in the region are responding [to] the war crimes and genocide of the child-killing Zionist regime and… they do not take orders from the Islamic Republic of Iran‚” he said. He further asserted: “These groups decide and act based on their own principles and priorities as well as the interests of their country and people.” * * * Below is some commentary on the ‘dilemma’ from Rabobank… Let’s then start Blinken – which is that the US is doing when the US Secretary of State states‚ “The response against Iran could be multi-levelled and come in stages and be sustained over time.” Operation Praying Mantis‚ where the US sank half the Iranian fleet in a day in the 1980s‚ it won’t be: Operation Praying Man‚ ‘tis. Because while the White House counts its dead‚ injured and loss of deterrence at the hands of Iran-backed forces –as Tehran says it didn’t do it– it’s also counting the cost of a war that would not only not be over by the 2024 election‚ where higher oil prices would likely mean Biden loses‚ but might still be going on in 2028. Markets will therefore be relieved as Bloomberg‚ both accurately and ridiculously‚ says the US aims to find a way to bomb Iran just enough to show it’s angry without doing real damage – so ‘politesse’‚ not real politics. But risks remain: bomb too much – war; bomb too little – more Iran pushback until we trigger that same war; and it’s not clear if there is a sweet-spot between the two.