Washington Week with The Atlantic‚ public television’s tax-funded weekly political roundtable which they tout as "objective" and "known for its depth‚ balance‚ and civil discourse‚" offered no balance as all the liberal journalists went along 100 percent with the Democrat narrative on the Biden impeachment inquiry officially launched last week.  Friday's panel treated the House Republican initiative with mockery and contempt. Guest host Franklin Foer of The Atlantic magazine -- who recently said Biden's media treatment is too tough -- held up a Democratic House member’s snarky dismissal of the move as a wise summary. Foer: But let's get to the substance‚ because this week‚ Congressman Jamie Raskin said‚ this isn't a whodunit‚ it is -- this is a what is it? So‚ the question is‚ Steve‚ what is it? Steve Inskeep‚ Co-Host‚ NPR's Morning Edition: I think it's a fair question. If you look at four other presidential impeachments‚ you can say in each case that the president of the United States definitely did something‚ and then you could debate whether it was impeachable or convictable….In each case‚ there was an act by a sitting president that was at the center of the debate. In this case‚ it's an impeachment inquiry to find out if Joe Biden may have done something while he was not president…. Inskeep somehow skipped the significant fact that Joe Biden was Vice President from 2009-2017‚ part of the presidential team. ABC News correspondent Jonathan Karl‚ aka the “three-time anti-Trump author‚” as we know him at NewsBusters‚ was blunt in his mockery. Karl: Well‚ first of all‚ because I think that there's a question of what's actually there‚ and there is nothing there. Foer: It's kind of the Seinfeld of impeachment votes‚ an impeachment vote about nothing? Karl: What are they doing? They've identified that Hunter Biden did some shady things. He certainly profited off his name. He got money. He got foreign money for business dealings. He did a lot of questionable things‚ and he was close to his father. And he did have dinner with his father at Cafe Milano at one point. Foer (sarcasm): High crime and misdemeanor‚ that. [Laughter] Karl:  But‚ I mean‚ I just don't see it going anywhere…. Karl and Foer are intentionally obscuring the point that Joe Biden met with Hunter Biden's foreign clients at that restaurant -- something Joe Biden denies‚ that he had no such "interactions." Later‚ Karl took the sentimental approach‚ giving Hunter Biden perverse credibility for his embarrassingly graphic autobiography. Karl: ….[President Biden] loves his son. He's close with his son. They talk all the time now‚ as you might expect. Look‚ Hunter -- it's such a tragic case. If you read Hunter Biden's very forthcoming biography‚ autobiography‚ that he wrote‚ really a memoir of his addiction that came out just months after Biden became president‚ it goes into incredibly lurid detail about his descent into addiction. And‚ I mean‚ this is a guy who came close to dying. In some ways‚ it's amazing that he survived it. And‚ you know‚ his father will do anything to stop from losing another son. Karl’s sympathy rounds continued‚ sounding passionate. Karl: And Hunter Biden wants to fight back against this‚ he believes that he has been‚ he and the people around him believe that he has been a victim of a political‚ you know‚ hit job. He acknowledges he's made all these mistakes. He acknowledged what you heard him acknowledge there in terms of his taxes. He was ready to plead guilty in a plea deal. Now that that's off‚ he wants to fight back and wants to fight back against the people who he believes‚ with very good reason‚ are going after him because the real target is his father…. This sentimental pro-Biden segment has been brought to you in part by Consumer Cellular‚ and taxpayers like you. A transcript is available‚ click “Expand.” PBS Washington Week with The Atlantic 12/15/23 8:03:17 p.m. (ET) Host Franklin Foer: Asma‚ I wanted to start with impeachment. Why now? What's the political imperative driving this forward? Asma Khalid‚ White House Correspondent‚ NPR: I mean‚ the why now is an excellent question‚ in part because Republicans‚ at least some Republicans in Congress‚ had been talking and investigating impeachment charges for a long time. Ultimately‚ I think what they were looking for was greater legitimacy. There were concerns from the White House that you don't have an official impeachment inquiry. Now‚ you're seeing House Republicans say‚ well‚ we have the official legitimacy to do this. But I also think that there is a political calculation here that Republicans want to muddy the waters. On the other side‚ they have a man who is most likely to be their nominee in Donald Trump‚ who is facing multiple charges. And I will say that there has long been a desire from some Republicans to just muddy the waters‚ make things confusing for voters. We've had polling‚ other outlets have had polling that suggest it is working. And a percentage of the population does think‚ in fact‚ some of our polling at NPR showed a majority of the electorate surveyed felt that President Biden had done something unethical in relation to his son's behavior. Largely‚ that's along partisan lines‚ but not exclusively. Foer: But let's get to the substance‚ because this week‚ Congressman Jamie Raskin said‚ this isn't a who done it‚ it is - this is a what is it? So‚ the question is‚ Steve‚ what is it? Steve Inskeep‚ Co-Host‚ NPR's Morning Edition: I think it's a fair question. If you look at four other presidential impeachments‚ you can say in each case that the president of the United States definitely did something‚ and then you could debate whether it was impeachable or convictable. Andrew Johnson fired a cabinet member in a way that he wasn’t supposed to‚ supposedly. Bill Clinton lied under oath. Donald Trump had the perfect phone call to Ukraine‚ as he called it‚ and then‚ of course‚ January 6th‚ the fourth impeachment. In each case‚ there was an act by a sitting president that was at the center of the debate. In this case‚ it's an impeachment inquiry to find out if Joe Biden may have done something while he was not president. There's not nothing there‚ because Hunter Biden and Biden's brother‚ James‚ and other people around Biden have been said to cash in on his name. And they certainly have had a lot of business dealings‚ some of which have gone wrong or been suspicious in some way‚ but Republicans have yet to connect it to the president. And when you go on the Oversight Committee's website‚ and they put a timeline there‚ which goes all the way to 2023‚ but there are no acts by Biden during his presidency in their own timeline. Jonathan Karl‚ Chief Washington Correspondent‚ ABC News: I mean‚ the astounding thing is they got every single Republican to vote to launch this inquiry. Now‚ look‚ he's not going to be impeached. I really don't see that happening with this narrow a margin. There are enough Republicans who have said that they're doing this simply to give the Congress the tools they need to investigate‚ to put some muscle behind the subpoena power‚ to allow them to investigate‚ which is a strange bar for an impeachment inquiry. As Steve points out‚ this is not in keeping with how impeachment has been used‚ but they got every single Republicans‚ including those‚ and there are a handful of them who are on the record saying‚ look‚ I don't see anything. Franklin Foer: But just keep going with that‚ because everybody thought a month ago or two months ago that they would struggle to bring along these Biden district Republicans‚ and yet they've gone along with this. Why do you think that they won't ultimately go along with an impeachment vote? Jonathan Karl: Well‚ first of all‚ because I think that there's a question of what's actually there‚ and there is nothing there. Franklin Foer: It's kind of the Seinfeld of impeachment votes‚ impeachment vote about nothing. Jonathan Karl: What are they doing? They've identified that Hunter Biden did some shady things. He certainly profited off his name. He got money. He got foreign money for business dealings. He did a lot of questionable things‚ and he was close to his father. And he did have dinner with his father at Cafe Milano at one point. Franklin Foer: High crime and misdemeanor‚ that. Jonathan Karl: But‚ I mean‚ I just don't see it going anywhere. And I think it -- look‚ Trump has been pushing for this from the beginning. I mean‚ Marjorie Taylor Greene is close to Trump as anybody in Congress‚ filed the first impeachment resolution the day that Biden got sworn in as president. And Troy Nehls and other Republicans made the point‚ we really need to do this so that we can show that it's not just Donald Trump who was impeached. I mean‚ it's nakedly political here. Franklin Foer: Yes‚ I'm old enough to remember the Clinton impeachment. I'm guessing some of you are too. And that felt like an event. That was something that was extraordinary. It felt historic. And now impeachment is -- they're like the cherry blossoms. They're just part of the Washington -- Asma Khalid: Every season. Franklin Foer: Yes‚ exactly. Jonathan Karl: Yes. I mean‚ you remember they brought the Starr report to the steps of the House‚ unloaded all the boxes of evidence‚ and then the impeachment inquiry started. I mean‚ it was a big deal. This is -- Steve Inskeep: There's still time. They'll work on it. They'll work on it. They'll work on it. Franklin Foer: But what does it mean as a means of constitutional redress that impeachment is just part of this ritual of trying to embarrass your political opponents? Does that mean that it's just been defanged as a way of curbing presidential power? Steve Inskeep: Well‚ it wasn't a very easy tool to use to begin with. We are in a strange environment where it is hard to see -- I mean‚ I don't understand how the tool would work at all. And it hasn't been used to remove a president. It's not about to be used to remove a president‚ and I think you're right on these terms‚ no. Jonathan Karl: I mean‚ we hit a real high watermark with the second Trump impeachment‚ the trial in the Senate‚ where you actually had seven members of the president's party vote to impeach him. It was only the second time that you had seen a member of the president's party vote to convict in a Senate trial. The first time was Trump's first impeachment. That was just one vote‚ though. Steve Inskeep: Mitch McConnell famously said impeachment is a political process and the conviction‚ the trial is a political question‚ not a legal question‚ and that has played out at least in the way that people have cast their votes. Franklin Foer: So‚ one of the central characters in this saga‚ Hunter Biden‚ meandered onto Capitol Hill this week. And since he doesn't make very many public appearances‚ it's worth listening to what he had to say. Hunter Biden: There's no evidence to support the allegations that my father was financially involved in my business because it did not happen. Franklin Foer: Asma‚ what do you think President Biden is thinking when he watches a clip like that? Asma Khalid: I have absolutely no clue. But what I will say is that the White House has been very eager to never touch any questions as they relate to Hunter Biden‚ whether they were about Hunter Biden's artwork‚ whether they're now about this‚ any questions‚ they don't. What I will also say‚ though‚ is that they often routinely tell us in the White House is that‚ you know‚ the president loves his son very much. This is a man who has long struggled with addiction‚ and‚ look‚ it's his only surviving son. And so I think many of us would say there's this constant tussle between what you emotionally want to do for your child. That being said‚ this is a different dynamic and that this is the president of the United States and anything his son does is going to get a lot of attention. Jonathan Karl: And the White House has kind of‚ they have been very careful not to really say anything‚ but for a while they were saying that Joe Biden had no knowledge of his president's business dealings. And then well-known now‚ he wasn't involved in his president's dealings. I mean‚ he clearly had knowledge. He loves his son. He's close with his son. They talk all the time now‚ as you might expect. Look‚ Hunter -- it's such a tragic case. If you read Hunter Biden's very forthcoming biography‚ autobiography‚ that he wrote‚ really a memoir of his addiction that came out just months after Biden became president‚ it goes into incredibly lurid detail about his descent into addiction. And‚ I mean‚ this is a guy who came close to dying. In some ways‚ it's amazing that he survived it. And‚ you know‚ his father will do anything to stop him losing another son. Franklin Foer: There's so much scar tissue‚ there's so much guilt there‚ and I'm sure it complicates the way that they‚ the White House‚ more specifically the president‚ deals with this Hunter Biden thing‚ which just continues to loom over things. Steve Inskeep:  Well‚ it is a strange thing to reflect that the most recent revelation by the Oversight Committee appears to have been payments between father and son‚ because Joe Biden‚ prior to being president‚ helped him make car payments and then was being repaid by Hunter. So‚ where did he get the money? But this is a kind of tragic example of what you're saying. This is a difficult family relationship with a guy who had a very difficult time‚ as opposed to something the president did as president. Asma Khalid: I will say‚ though‚ as tragic as it is‚ I think from really like an emotional family perspective‚ it is nonetheless a political liability‚ right? I mean‚ the president doesn't want to be discussing his son. He doesn't want any of this. No Democrat that I've spoken to really wants to see this play out ahead as we move into the final election. Franklin Foer: And you read these reports in Politico and other places that the White House would like to take a different approach than the one that Hunter Biden is taking‚ but the president has an exceedingly hard time making that case‚ and he doesn't really want to hear that case. Jonathan Karl: And Hunter Biden wants to fight back against this‚ he believes that he has been‚ he and the people around him believe that he has been a victim of a political‚ you know‚ hit job. He acknowledges he's made all these mistakes. He acknowledged what you heard him acknowledge there in terms of his taxes. He was ready to plead guilty‚ you know‚ in a plea deal. Now‚ that that's off‚ he wants to fight back and wants to fight back against the people who he believes‚ with very good reason‚ are going after him because the real target is his father. That said‚ he is now facing felony charges on his failure to pay taxes‚ felony charges that will -- you know‚ we will see play out amidst the presidential campaign just as we're going to see‚ you know‚ felony charges against Donald Trump. Franklin Foer: Is there anything they can do to diffuse this? Because as Asma says‚ it's stuck‚ that there -- Asma Khalid: It’s muddying the waters. And one thing I will say is that while it was certainly‚ and Hunter says‚ right‚ and this is -- you hear from a lot of Democrats‚ is that it's being put forward to sort of poison the atmosphere and go after the president. I will also say that more than once‚ on two different occasions‚ I have met younger voters of color who specifically cited to me Hunter's situation in saying that they felt like he was not being treated as fairly as some other. I mean‚ one young woman I met at the NAACP convention over the summer said there are so many young black men in jail‚ why should he get a pardon? Why should he get a pass? Which I think is an interesting observation of how some of this is percolating down even into fragments of the Democratic Party. Jonathan Karl: I mean‚ it's really interesting‚ because the talking point from Biden's allies‚ from Hunter Biden's allies is‚ if his name weren't Biden‚ he wouldn't be prosecuted for this. He's being prosecuted for failure to pay taxes‚ taxes that he ultimately paid with interest plus penalties. So that's a good point. That's not usually charged. Then‚ again‚ he wouldn't have been making millions of dollars in these foreign ventures if his name wasn't Biden either.

A California ski resort’s recently announced plan to erect a Virgin Mary statue has sparked outrage among some locals seeking to block the project’s construction.Mt. Shasta Ski Park in McCloud announced on social media last week that it plans to install a 20-foot Virgin Mary statue at the peak of Douglas Butte in northern California.“This season you will see what will be the Statue’s platform and the statue itself will be in place by next summer‚” the resort stated.“The installation of this statue is very important to our owner as this was a shared goal with her late husband and business partner‚ Ray Merlo‚” the social media post continued. “They have dedicated their resources to improving the Ski Park over the last few years and in the words of Robin Merlo‚ this statue is a promise fulfilled and a true representation of the dedication to family that we all value so much here at the Ski Park.”The resort noted that the goal of erecting the statue “is not to focus on any one religion but to acknowledge and honor the beauty and spiritual power of the mountain we all love so much.”The resort’s post on Instagram and Facebook included a rendering of the statue. Plans for the project ignited outrage among some locals‚ prompting the resort to turn off the ability to comment on the post.Critics launched an online petition‚ “Stop the Construction of a Religious Statue at Our Local Ski Park‚” with the goal of collecting 2‚500 signatures in hopes of pressuring the resort to halt the project. As of Monday morning‚ the petition had already collected more than 1‚900 signatures.The petition read‚ “Many of us have been skiing at our beloved local ski park in Mount Shasta since childhood. It has always been a place of joy‚ unity‚ and natural beauty. However‚ recent efforts to erect a religious statue threaten to disrupt this cherished environment.”According to the petition‚ the Virgin Mary statue would “alienate members of our diverse community who do not share the same religious beliefs.”“Local gathering places‚ whether private or not‚ should remain neutral spaces that promote inclusivity and respect for all visitors‚” the petition argued.It called upon the owners of the resort to “cease and desist this construction project immediately.” “We ask the US Forest Service‚ with whom the ski park holds use permits‚ to insist that Mount Shasta Ski Park discontinue this project‚” it added.The petition suggested donating the funds used to erect the statue to a homeless shelter or detox facility.Signatories of the petition called the project “outrageous‚” “horrible‚” and “a gross desecration.” Supporters used the petition’s comment section to vilify Christianity. “Keep your religious beliefs to yourself. If you want to put up an expensive statue‚ put up one for the native Americans your ancestors slaughtered and then took this land from them. You hypocrites. We will never spend another penny with you. You are evil‚” one of the petition’s supporters wrote.Another called for the resort to “keep religion out of skiing.”A third commenter stated‚ “Less than 20% of humanity is Christian and with so many radicals within that environment threatening women and reproductive freedom‚ its (sic) a very‚ very‚ inconsiderate move.”“Religion is poison‚” another supporter wrote‚ quoting Mao Zedong‚ the Chinese communist dictator responsible for roughly 65 million deaths. The comment was among the most popular in the thread‚ receiving 14 likes.The ski resort did not respond to a request for comment‚ the New York Post reported.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Did you know that in order to be a good volleyball player‚ you need to own an actual volleyball? Crazy concept‚ but thanks to writers like Drew Ortiz of Sports Illustrated‚ we have the latest insight into athletic development. If you’re sitting there wondering what the heck we’re talking about‚ allow Glenn Beck to explain. Drew‚ who is “the author of many stories” in Sports Illustrated‚ ”has spent much of his life outdoors. …There's rarely a weekend that goes by where Drew isn't out camping‚ hiking‚ or just back on his parents’ farm‚” Glenn reads from Drew’s writer profile. “Now Drew sounds like a regular guy‚ doesn’t he?” At least that’s what everyone thought until one of his articles explained how “volleyball is very difficult‚ especially to practice‚ if you don't have a ball.” And that’s when people started to realize that “Drew doesn’t exist.” He’s actually a machine (and not a particularly smart one)‚ or at least that’s what the AI testing system determined when it processed Drew’s work. While Sports Illustrated has denied allegations that Drew Ortiz is the creation of AI‚ the outlet has “removed all of his writings‚” which only seems to strengthen the theory that he’s not a real person. And apparently Drew isn’t the only fictional writer at the American sports magazine. “Looks like Drew doesn't exist as well as other writers at Sports Illustrated‚” Glenn reports. To hear more about the scandal‚ watch the clip below. Want more from Glenn Beck?To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling‚ thought-provoking analysis‚ and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos‚ subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America‚ defend the Constitution‚ and live the American dream.

Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley called out ABC News and the entire legacy media on Sunday for their "obsession" with Donald Trump.Haley appeared on ABC News' "This Week‚" presumably to discuss her campaign‚ which is gaining momentum. But ABC News host Jonathan Karl only seemed interested in asking her about Trump — not her campaign‚ her views‚ or the solutions she wants to offer the American people.In fact‚ eight of the first 10 questions he asked focused on Trump in some way — and Haley finally had enough."You guys are exhausting! You're exhausting in your obsession with him‚" Haley said.Haley‚ the former governor of South Carolina‚ went on to explain why that "obsession" demonstrates just how out of touch the legacy media are with the American people."The thing is the normal people aren't obsessed with Trump like you guys are. The normal people care about the fact that they can't afford things. They feel like their freedoms are being taken away. They think government is too big‚" she said."I know y'all want to talk about every single word he says and every single tweet he does. That's exactly why we need a new generational leader‚ because people don't want to hear about every word a person says or every tweet. They want to know how you fought for them that day‚ and they want to know how their life is going to be different‚" she pointed out. "And life will be a whole lot different if the media would stop this obsession with Trump." Haley is right. The media are obsessed with Trump — and for good reason‚ or so they think.Just as they did in 2016‚ the media are boosting Trump's press visibility and covering his every word because they want him to be the 2024 Republican nominee. They want him to be the nominee again because they believe he will lose the general election. And by covering Trump more‚ the media cover other Republicans less‚ candidates whom they believe stand a better chance of beating Biden.For his part‚ Karl denied the media have an "obsession" with Trump. Still‚ he stopped asking Haley about the former president after she called him out. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development announced a sharp increase in homelessness at the beginning of 2023‚ with a 12% increase in single-night numbers.HUD used "Point-in-Time Estimates‚" which reported the number of people in shelters‚ those in temporary housing‚ and those simply unsheltered. The report found that 653‚000 individuals were "experiencing homelessness" on a single night in January 2023‚ a 12% increase from 2022. The rise represents 70‚650 more homeless. The new number represents the largest number of homeless people in the country since the agency began surveying such data in 2007‚ the Epoch Times noted.HUD blamed the rise on a post-pandemic expiration of resources‚ after the department claimed funding prevented a rise in homelessness between 2020 and 2022. However‚ homelessness among families who have children saw the greatest increase at 15.5%‚ while homeless veterans increased by 7.4%. More than half of those who are homeless reportedly lived in just four states: California‚ Florida‚ New York‚ and Washington.At the same time‚ HUD pointed to mostly Texan cities as places where homelessness has been curtailed as part of government programs.For example‚ the government agency stated that Dallas City and County saw "a small decrease of 3.8% in overall homelessness as well as a 14% decrease in unsheltered homelessness and 32% decrease in chronic homelessness between 2022 and 2023."It also cited San Antonio and Houston‚ Texas‚ as examples. As well‚ San Jose/Santa Clara City and Watsonville/Santa Cruz City‚ California‚ were touted as success stories. Homeless individuals decreased by 1.2% in Santa Clara County and dropped by 4.7% in the city limits of San José‚ the document noted‚ while the Santa Cruz area saw a 21.5% decrease in homelessness. The latter‚ HUD explained‚ was due to "significant influx on resources from federal and state government agencies in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.""Homelessness is solvable and should not exist in the United States‚" said Secretary Marcia L. Fudge. "From day one‚ this Administration has put forth a comprehensive plan to tackle homelessness and we’ve acted aggressively and in conjunction with our federal‚ state‚ and local partners to address this challenge‚" she added.Kari Lake‚ candidate for U.S. Senate‚ blamed President Joe Biden's policies for fueling the homelessness crisis. Lake also noted that Democrat Rep. Ruben Gallego's district in Phoenix‚ Arizona‚ has been particularly plagued with homelessness."In Joe Biden's America‚ it's almost impossible to pay rent or afford a home‚" she wrote. "Homelessness nationwide just reached its highest reported level at 12%. Nowhere in Arizona is this more obvious than Ruben Gallego's district." she added.HUD noted Tucson‚ Arizona‚ has had a "9% reduction in unsheltered homelessness‚ as well as slight 1% decrease in overall homelessness" from 2022 to 2023. In @JoeBiden's America‚ it's almost impossible to pay rent or afford a home. \n\nHomeless nationwide just reached its highest reported level at 12%.\n\nNowhere in Arizona is this more obvious than @RubenGallego's district. \n\nRuben's negligence &; rubberstamping of Biden's agenda let\xe2\x80\xa6 — (@) Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

It doesn’t take much to see that President Joe Biden has committed several high crimes — which are grounds for impeachment according to Mark Levin and the Constitution. Biden swore an oath when he came into office‚ and that oath has been violated. Throughout his presidency‚ Biden has been engulfed in financial scandals with his family and enemies of the United States. That includes communist China‚ Russians in Moscow‚ and the previous Ukrainian government‚ which Levin notes was “a puppet of Vladimir Putin and Burisma and all the rest of it — the front corporations‚ the money laundering‚ the failure to pay taxes. Mr. 10%‚ Mr. Big‚ the laptop.” “He’s violated the United States Constitution at least three ways‚” Levin adds. He’s violated Article One when it comes to immigration. “Joe Biden has purposefully‚ intentionally violated dozens of federal immigration laws‚ federal statutes passed duly by Congress‚” Levin says‚ explaining that Biden has “underminded them by his actions‚ by his directives‚ by his executive orders.” He’s also undermined them through his cabinet department of DHS and by not only not enforcing the laws but by insisting that they not be enforced. “The mayhem that has been created in this country is unimaginable‚” Levin says‚ referencing the fentanyl and human trafficking crisis our open border has caused. And that’s just Article One. Article Two says the power of the purse belongs to Congress and more specifically the House of Representatives. “When Joe Biden decided‚ ‘You know what‚ I’m going to forgive a half a trillion or a trillion dollars in student loans because they’re my voters’” — he again violated the Constitution. “Joe has actively gone around the Constitution‚ the Congress‚ has defied the purpose and directive of the U.S. Supreme Court and has now given away $400 to $500 billion of taxpayer dollars in violation of the Constitution‚” Levin explains. His last violation is empowering the enemy. “What if we have a commander in chief that takes steps that actually empowers our sworn enemy. That takes steps to issue waivers that allows tens of billions of dollars to flow into the coffers of‚ say‚ the Iranian regime‚ a terrorist regime which has murdered American citizens‚” Levin says. “We have a president of the United States who not only gives aid and comfort to the enemy‚ he literally gives billions of dollars to them‚” he adds. Want more from Mark Levin?To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America‚ defend the Constitution‚ and live the American dream.

Some of my favorite genres come together in Roots of Yggdrasil. We’ve got city building‚ roguelike elements‚ and a sprinkling of card mechanics all in one. Instead of building up one metropolis like in Cities Skylines 2‚ you’re stuck in a Norse mythology time loop and need to master the mechanics to find a way out. Plus‚ there's a drafting and deckbuilding system that persists between runs to help you get further each time. Continue reading City building‚ roguelikes‚ and Valheim combine in this Steam game MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best roguelike games‚ Best city-building games‚ Best card games

What are the best police games? We have all considered life as a super sleuth or detective for a brief moment. Whether drawn in by the position of authority‚ the puzzling casework‚ or even the hard-drinking; police games do tend to deliver plenty of action and intrigue. However‚ unlike many of the best PC games‚ cops aren't all gunslingers in John Woo-esque shootouts or chasing criminals in high-speed car chases. The best police games often see you digging through crime scenes for evidence and carrying out routine procedures rather than pursuing perps with your gun drawn.  If you're looking for Sherlock and the other great PC game sleuths‚ check out our best detective games list. Continue reading Best police games on PC 2023 MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Ready Or Not system requirements‚ Best FPS games on PC‚ Best Co-Op games on PC

Imagine being John Romero in 1996. Between Wolfenstein 3D‚ Doom‚ and Quake‚ you have developed - or co-developed - three of the greatest masterworks in PC gaming history. Although with a few caveats‚ you can call yourself one of the creators of the entire FPS game genre. Forget videogames. You’ve changed the entirety of popular culture‚ forever. So what do you do? You do what anybody would - you make your dream project. One of the most storied‚ controversial‚ and infamous shooters ever developed‚ if you haven’t played Daikatana for yourself‚ it’s nowhere near as bad as everyone says. For less than $1‚ it deserves to be experienced first hand. Continue reading One of the most controversial FPS games ever made is less than $1

Beyond Skyrim is one of the most impressive mod projects I've ever seen‚ and given the community of players still working on Bethesda's charming magnum opus‚ that's saying something. The project still hasn't been fully released and is likely a ways off‚ but a brand new update video gives us our best look at the game yet while confirming it will have more voiced lines than Bethesda's vanilla release. Continue reading Skyrim mod remaking Cyrodiil has more voice lines than Bethesda’s game MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best Skyrim mods‚ Elder Scrolls 6 release date‚ Games like Skyrim