';Traitor';: Texas National Guardsman Arrested for Human Smuggling

Shocking Development: Scotland';s First Minister Humza Useless Being Reported for ';Hate Crimes';

Poll: Most of the Elite Are Okay With Cheating to Win Elections

Leading expert on near-death experiences‚ Dr Sam Parnia‚ believes we will soon learn what happens after death. He has studied cardiac arrest survivors and claims they have seen light at the end of the tunnel.Parnia believes that our consciousness is not part of our brain and does not die when we die‚ reports dailystar.co.uk.He says: I think in 50 or 100 years time we will have discovered the entity that is consciousness. It will be taken for granted that it wasnt produced by the brain‚ and it doesnt die when you die.Other experts agree with Parnia. Leading critical care medicine expert Dr. Lance Becker says‚ I dont think there has ever been a more exciting time for the field. Were discovering new drugs‚ were discovering new devices‚ and were discovering new things about the brain.Dr. Jimo Borjigin‚ a professor of neurology at the University of Michigan found evidence of electrical activity in the brain after death.She says: I believe what we found is only the tip of a vast iceberg. Whats still beneath the surface is a full account of how dying actually takes place.Because theres something happening in there‚ in the brain‚ that makes no sense.According to surveys‚ every tenth person claims to have been on the verge of death. Thats approximately 800 million people worldwide who may have touched the afterlife.Discoveries in the field of near-death experiences raise questions about what happens after death. Perhaps we will soon learn that life really continues after death.The post Scientists: Well soon find out what happens after death appeared first on Anomalien.com.

This is one of the primary reasons I plan to homeschool my kids.A portion of the sex ed curriculum from an Oregon school was just leaked after Libs of TikTok posted photos obtained by a parent. The images indicate that gender identity is not the same as sex and provided a graphic detailing where on the body these terms come from. Naturally‚ users on X are outraged by the blatant grooming done by the lesson.According to Libs of TikToks post‚ an Oregon parent asked his childs school for a copy of the curriculum used in sex ed class. The school refused to send it but instead instructed the parent that he could come into the school and view the curriculum on a school computer.When the parent went down to the school he took a photo of two of the pages of a particular lesson in the class.The pages show a drawing of a person with various graphics that correlate to terms. The brain is correlated with gender identity. The description for gender identity is a persons sense of self in relation to gender. AKA‚ it doesnt have to match a persons sex.There was a little fire emoji right at the top of the persons chest which was linked with sexual orientation. The description had three parts: 1. Orientation: Who a person is sexually attracted to 2. Behavior: How a person behaves sexually 3. Identity: What a person calls themself.A parent in Oregon allegedly asked for a copy of his kid';s school';s S*x Ed curriculum and the school refused to send it. They only allowed him to see it within the school walls on a school computer where he snapped these screenshots.Why are schools hiding lesson plans from pic.twitter.com/rWvEWf7YHR Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) April 3‚ 2024Below the fire emoji was a heart which linked to Romantic Orientation which was described as Who a person is romantically attracted to.Over on the left was a tab that said Assigned Gender/Sex at Birth and it was connected with an arrow to a green star over the persons crotch. The gender/sex assigned at birth based on a persons genitals‚ the description read.Finally‚ the last tab was linked to the orange outline of the person and was called Gender Expression: How a person presents themself (i.e. style‚ actions‚ demeanor‚ and more).This graphic could have very easily been done‚ and would have been more accurate‚ with a quarter of the amount of information. Theres no such thing as assigned gender or gender identity. Youre either a male or a female. Thats it.The second page of the lesson captured gave an example of a person named Casey with the pronouns they/them. That page indicated how much on the spectrum of each category Casey felt. Apparently ";they"; was intersex and felt neither male nor female for his gender identity‚ had no sexual orientation or romantic attraction and felt‚ in terms of ";them';s"; ";gender expression‚"; mostly feminine‚ somewhat masculine and a portion of other so God only knows how this thing is dressing at this point.In response to the graphic‚ users were outraged that the Oregon school would teach such nonsense and peeved that the school wasnt transparent about the content.If schools are not freely sharing all curriculum with parents then the curriculum isnt appropriate. This is so basic. Parents should immediately pull their kids out if their kids school is hiding anything from parents. Yet another reason to homeschool‚ one user wrote. Another individual wrote‚ School should be shut down for teaching this psuedoscience. A different user pointed out the fact that if schools didnt have anything to hide‚ why werent they transparent about the lesson from the get go?If there were nothing wrong‚ there would be no reason to hide anything? Aren';t we always told that? So clearly‚ they feel what they are doing would not be received well by the parents who send their children there. They would be right. This is wrong‚ the user wrote.All I can say is that kids at this school need to be homeschooled and fast!

Blaze Media CEO and podcast host Glenn Beck called out Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg for his wildly manipulative remarks on his bosss insane electric vehicle push.During the April 3 edition of Glenn Beck TV‚ Beck tore into Buttigieg for ignoring the devastating effects of President Joe Bidens authoritarian Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulation against gas-powered cars.Buttigieg had shamelessly claimed during a Fox News interview that the auto industry was naturally moving towards EVs and compared gasoline vehicles to landline phones‚ to which Beck retorted: He says the automotive sector is moving away from combustion engines. No‚ they are not‚ theyre not. The people are not and its the government pushing them into that direction. And the people are saying‚ I dont want that. Beck is right on target‚ polls show.Only 30% of Americans support phasing out gas-powered vehicles and even fewer (21%) support restrictions on gas-powered vehicles‚ according to a 2023 Yahoo Finance/Ipsos poll. The poll made clear that breaking down the results by education and age still showed a consistent majority against both ideas. Similarly‚ a 2023 Pew Research Center survey found that 59% of voters opposed phasing out gas-powered cars.No‚ Pete Buttigieg. The automotive sector isnt moving toward EVs and away from gas cars like we did from landline phones. The government is FORCING the industry to move away. pic.twitter.com/hVxVtR10NL Glenn Beck (@glennbeck) April 3‚ 2024Becks withering response followed a series of absurd claims from Buttigieg on the April 2 edition of Fox News America Reports. Lets be clear that the automotive sector is moving towards EVs and we cant pretend otherwise. Sometimes when these debates happen‚ I feel like its the early 2000s and Im talking to some people who think we can just have landline phones forever‚ Buttigieg said.On his podcast‚ Beck scorched Buttigieg for this dumb comparison. Its not like they were pushing cell phones and everyone was like‚ Oh I gotta‚ I mean it';s just getting crazy to have a cell phone‚ I dont really have a choice soon. It';s not like even incandescent light bulbs‚ Beck said. We went to the cellular service because everyone started having it.Buttigieg went on to suggest during his interview that the nations national security depended on a quick transition to electric vehicles‚ claiming: The reality is that the automotive sector is moving towards EVs and the U.S. can either fall behind China or we can claim the lead. He must have missed The Wall Street Journal reporting from two days before his interview detailing how the U.S. electrical grid will become more vulnerable to enemy exploitation as the infrastructure to support electric cars is expanded.Beck wasnt the only one to call out Buttigieg for his out-of-touch remarks.On the April 3 edition of The Big Money Show on Fox Business‚ Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA) also condemned Buttigiegs deception. This is another example of the American liberals and their agenda pushing this. Anytime the federal government picks winners and losers consumers are going to lose‚ Rep. Carter said. That';s what is happening now with the administration trying to pick winners and losers‚ trying to force people to buy EVs. The Secretary of Transportation making a mockery out of this and the American people and I take offense to that and I think a lot of Americans take offense to that. We don';t need to be told what we need to buy‚ he continued.MRC Business Associate Editor Joseph Vazquez contributed to this report.Conservatives are under attack! Contact ABC News at 818-460-7477‚ CBS News at 212-975-3247 and NBC News at 212-664-6192 and demand they hold Biden and his cronies accountable for attempting to restrict fossil fuel production and Americans choices.

Given Wednesdays White House press briefing ran less than 40 minutes‚ its abbreviated state largely made it uneventful aside from a truly comical Doocy Time having left the ever-inept Karine Jean-Pierre even more incoherent than usual and‚ on the other end of the spectrum‚ taxpayer-funded National Public Radios (NPR) Asma Khalid pled for Israel to suffer consequences for its war against Hamas.Foxs Peter Doocy first question dealt with a little-discussed but important topic to national security: the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR).[S]o‚ you guys started draining the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to try and help with the Putin Price Hike a few years ago. Said You were going to refill it. But now it doesnt seem like thats happening. Why‚ he asked.Jean-Pierres stammering‚ stumbling answer was one for the ages:Well‚ from I believe the Department of Energy is is responsible for for that particular component is refilling refilling that‚ so I would refer to the Department of Energy. I know there are certain components to that and how they were going to move forward and refilling refilling it. Uh I they would have had more specifics on that for you.Doocys remaining time focused on the Biden border crisis‚ starting with this query that left Jean-Pierre playing dumb and asking for more information: And why isnt federal immigration law tougher on border crossers who come here and are accused of serious crimes?Given Jean-Pierres befuddlement‚ Doocy explained more: Theres this story in New York an eight-person crew of border crossers found with drugs and guns. Six of them now are out on bail. Does President Biden think policies like that are making the country safer?Jean-Pierre ducked‚ citing this example as being an active case‚ so dont want to comment on an active case‚ but anyone found guilty and weve been very clear about that anyone found guilty of a crime should be held accountable and that the Biden regime has been very‚ very clear about that.Doocy last question touched on the lefts pro-crime tendencies: So‚ more generally then‚ do you guys think that some big cities in this country have liberal DAs that are too soft on crime?Of course‚ Jean-Pierre also refused to answer other than reiterating her previous answer and declining to speak to every state or city here.Khalid immediately followed Doocy and made sure to represent the pro-Gaza‚ anti-Israel (so‚ pro-Hamas) voice that applies to a small subset of the country:Your tax dollars at work.....NPR';s Asma Khalid: [Y]ou heard the President being outraged strike on aid workers. In the past‚ the president has also referred to indiscriminate bombing. I';m wondering if you can articulate why‚ thus far‚ there has been no consequences [for pic.twitter.com/QgF4A6adkp Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 3‚ 2024Khalid wasnt satisfied‚ so she kept pressing (which was more than NPR would on caught dead doing for a conservative or Republican cause) (click expand):KHALID: Can you articulate why there have been no consequences thus far for any types of behavior that the President has been outraged by?JEAN-PIERRE: Hey‚ look‚ weve had we are having conversations with the Israeli government. Weve been very clear about that. Those conversations have been tough. Weve been very public about those conversations. On this particular instant [sic]‚ there will be an investigation. There is an investigation currently happening. The President has said he wants it to be swift. He wants it to be comprehensive‚ and he wants to be there to see accountability to bring account account right to bring accountability. He said that in his statement‚ and he wants to make sure that it is public. So‚ were going to let that process move forward and‚ you know‚ You said it yourself. The President also has been publicly clear here about what how he feels about what he has seen. We do not want to see innocence civilians die here. We do not want that and were going to continue to be clear and have those conversations from the President on down with our counterparts in in the Israeli government and those conversations iditions are tough‚ right? You think about Rafah the Rafah operations. Weve been clear about that how where we stand that a military operations [sic] is not the way to go. There are alternative ways of getting those Hamas operators in Rafah. Thats why we had a meeting a virtual meeting on Monday. Thats where were going to have an in-person meeting with Israeli government. The person take the President takes this very seriously. He wants to make sure that innocent civilian lives are protected‚ including those humanitarian aid workers who are out there and‚ yes‚ hes outraged and hes heartbroken by what happened yesterday and were going to have those conversations with the Israeli government as we have been. Its going to continue.This back-and-forth went on a few more rounds as Khalid even interrupted to whine shes privately asked Biden officials about as to whether Biden has personally met with anyone who had been to Gaza since October 7.Gee‚ what happened then‚ Asthma? And whose fault is it that Gaza looks far different than it did prior to October 7?Jean-Pierre offered plenty of platitudes about the Arab American community but wouldnt say yes or no out of respect for private meetings.To see the relevant transcript from the April 3 briefing‚ click expand.White House press briefing [via ABC News Live subfeed]April 3‚ 20241:25 p.m. EasternPETER DOOCY: First‚ the so‚ you guys started draining the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to try and help with the Putin Price Hike a few years ago. Said You were going to refill it. But now it doesnt seem like thats happening. Why?KARINE JEAN-PIERRE: Well‚ from I believe the Department of Energy is is responsible for for that particular component is refilling refilling that‚ so I would refer to the Department of Energy. I know there are certain components to that and how they were going to move forward and refilling refilling it. Uh I they would have had more specifics on that for you.DOOCY: Okay. And why isnt federal immigration law tougher on border crossers who come here and are accused of serious crimes?JEAN-PIERRE: So um are you speaking of a specific case?DOOCY: Theres this story in New York an eight-person crew of border crossers found with drugs and guns. Six of them now are out on bail. Does President Biden think policies like that are making the country safer?JEAN-PIERRE: So I want to be really careful. Thats an active case‚ so dont want to comment on an active case‚ but anyone found guilty and weve been very clear about that anyone found guilty of a crime should be held accountable. We have been very‚ very clear about that and if they if a person poses a danger to the community‚ they should be detained pretrial.DOOCY: So‚ more generally then‚ do you guys think that some big cities in this country have liberal DAs that are too soft on crime?JEAN-PIERRE: Look‚ what I will say is‚ Im not going to speak to every state or city here. I its not for me to speak to. We have been very clear about this. Anyone who commits a crime and is found guilty needs to be held accountable. Thats what this President believes‚ and we are certainly very much. We welcome local law enforcement support and cooperation and apprehending and removing individuals in this country who pose a risk to our national security or also public safety. If they are found guilty. They should be held accountable. Thats our thats where we stand on this. [TO KHALID] Go ahead.ASHMA KHALID: Thank‚ Karine. Two questions‚ one is you heard the President being outraged strike on aid workers. In the past‚ the president has also referred to indiscriminate bombing. Im wondering if you can articulate why‚ thus far‚ there has been no consequences and why there are no consequences? So‚ beyond JEAN-PIERRE: So I want to be clear. Its its not me‚ referring to that. this is the Presidents statement. Im just lifting up the statement from last night where he says KHALID: Yeah‚ and I understand that.JEAN-PIERRE: I am outraged and heartbroken. The first the first basically line part of the first line of the Presidents Presidents statement from last night‚ and it speaks for itself and he talked about how he talked about how theres more that needs to be done to protect innocent civilians in Gaza.KHALID: Can you articulate why there have been no consequences thus far for any types of behavior that the President has been outraged by?JEAN-PIERRE: Hey‚ look‚ weve had we are having conversations with the Israeli government. Weve been very clear about that. Those conversations have been tough. Weve been very public about those conversations. On this particular instant [sic]‚ there will be an investigation. There is an investigation currently happening. The President has said he wants it to be swift. He wants it to be comprehensive‚ and he wants to be there to see accountability to bring account account right to bring accountability. He said that in his statement‚ and he wants to make sure that it is public. So‚ were going to let that process move forward and‚ you know‚ You said it yourself. The President also has been publicly clear here about what how he feels about what he has seen. We do not want to see innocence civilians die here. We do not want that and were going to continue to be clear and have those conversations from the President on down with our counterparts in in the Israeli government and those conversations iditions are tough‚ right? You think about Rafah the Rafah operations. Weve been clear about that how where we stand that a military operations [sic] is not the way to go. There are alternative ways of getting those Hamas operators in Rafah. Thats why we had a meeting a virtual meeting on Monday. Thats where were going to have an in-person meeting with Israeli government. The person take the President takes this very seriously. He wants to make sure that innocent civilian lives are protected‚ including those humanitarian aid workers who are out there and‚ yes‚ hes outraged and hes heartbroken by what happened yesterday and were going to have those conversations with the Israeli government as we have been. Its going to continue.KHALID: Yeah and if I can also go back to something that was asked earlier about the presidential meeting with any aid workers or anybody whos been inside of Gaza since October 7. I mean‚ it is a question of also privately posed to some of your colleagues and it feels like a yes or no question whether or not hes actually met with somebody whos been inside. And the reason Im asking is a number of people at the meeting said‚ to their knowledge this was the first time the President had actually spoken to anybody whos been inside of Gaza since October 7. And [inaudible] JEAN-PIERRE: Heres what I can tell you. Hes met with community leaders who are obviously from the Muslim community‚ the Arab community‚ the Palestinian community. I would let them speak for themselves on if theyve been to Gaza. You know‚ I dont have any we dont have any information to share about that. We want to be really mindful that the this meeting and many meetings that weve held had have been private. We want to respect that and so‚ just going to leave it there. I think what is important‚ though like‚ I understand the question.KHALID: [Inaudible] updates JEAN-PIERRE: Wait. No‚ no. No‚ no‚ no.KHALID: from‚ you know‚ what the situation tangibly looks like.JEAN-PIERRE: no‚ I I understand‚ right? I I get what youre saying the importance of hearing from folks who have been on the ground in Gaza. I totally understand that‚ but I think its also important that the President is hearing directly from the community directly from the community who are some of them are personally affected by whats happening in Gaza‚ right? And so‚ the fact that senior White House officials are having those conversations tough conversations is important that the fact that the President has done so as well is important. But I I hear your question‚ but we are also hearing from folks from the community having these sit-down conversations. the community leaders that were here yesterday and met with the President and the Vice President they asked for a working-group conversation and we listened and we made that happen and the President heard directly from them what they are going through‚ what they see‚ how painful it has been for them. So‚ I think thats important as well. We cant we cant not you know um lift that up as well.

PBSs Amanpour and Company is‚ apparently‚ where irony goes to die. On the Wednesday show‚ first aired on CNN International‚ host Christiane Amanpour welcomed alleged comedian Bassem Youssef‚ who has family in Gaza‚ to lament double standards in media coverage on Israeli and Palestinian suffering while the latter told Israel to go F itself‚ something no media personality would ever have any guest say about Palestinians.Amanpour recalled that we spoke to Queen Rania on this program several times. In fact‚ she was actually the first leader to come out and talk about double standards‚ and her interview with us was incredibly widely seen. And she said‚ similar to you‚ that‚ you know‚ there is a double standard in the way Palestinian suffering has always been reported and continues to be reported. It is really hard to hear you say and hear others say that they don';t look at us as people.There is a double standard‚ just not the one Amanpour thinks. The media runs story after story on Palestinian suffering‚ even more so than they run stories on Ukrainian suffering and unlike Hamas‚ Ukraine didnt start that war‚ while trying to claim Hamas has nothing to do with ordinary Palestinians. The media uncritically repeats Hamass casualty propaganda numbers and people like Amanpour interview people like Youssef.As for Youssef‚ he declared‚ Because they were deemed animals‚ terrorists‚ Hamas sympathizers. The thing is Israel reminds me a lot with Trump. Remember when Trump was saying lie after lie‚ one atrocious thing after the other‚ and by the time people deal with this‚ he';s already moved on‚ the people are like‚ all right‚ that';s Donald Trump?Ignoring all the Hamas weapons and fighters found at various hospitals in Gaza‚ Youssef continued‚ Israel is doing the same. You know‚ they';re doing -- remember when we were out all the rage about like babies killed in incubators‚ then baby killed with hangers‚ and then people killed stampede. And then‚ it';s old news now. Remember when we were talking about‚ did Hamas or did Israel bombed the Ali Hospital and since then‚ Israel bombed 36 hospitals? It';s just‚ they move too fast.Youssef added And by the time you just like catch up and you corner them was like‚ well‚ I';m entitled. They were like‚ if you talk about it‚ you';re anti-Semitic. I am doing this to protect myself. Here';s the thing‚ every time Israel say like Israel have the right to defend itself‚ Israel had the right to exist‚ and I want to say like Israel have the right to go F itself.As Youssef cracked himself up‚ Amanpour sat there silently‚ unsuccessfully trying to hide the smile she knew that she‚ as a supposedly truth-telling journalist‚ was not supposed to have. Instead of calling Youssef out on his lies or observing that‚ despite all the talk about how Israelis benefit from double standards‚ she would never have on an Israeli comedian to tell the Palestinians to go F themselves‚ she offered up a weak That';s your stand-up. It';s not your stand-up‚ actually.Here is a transcript for the April 3 show:PBS Amanpour and Company4/3/2024CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: You know‚ we spoke to Queen Rania on this program several times. In fact‚ she was actually the first leader to come out and talk about double standards‚ and her interview with us was incredibly widely seen. And she said‚similar to you‚ that‚ you know‚ there is a double standard in the way Palestinian suffering has always been reported and continues to be reported.It is really hard to hear you say and hear others say that they don';t look at us as people.BASSEM YOUSSEF: Because they were deemed animals‚ terrorists‚ Hamas sympathizers. The thing is Israel reminds me a lot with Trump. Remember when Trump was saying lie after lie‚ one atrocious thing after the other‚ and by the time people deal with this‚ he';s already moved on‚ the people are like‚ all right‚ that';s Donald Trump?Israel is doing the same. You know‚ they';re doing -- remember when we were out all the rage about like babies killed in incubators‚ then baby killed with hangers‚ and then people killed stampede. And then‚ it';s old news now. Remember when we were talking about‚ did Hamas or did Israel bombed the Ali (ph) Hospital and since then‚ Israel bombed 36 hospitals? It';s just they move too fast.And by the time you just like catch up and you corner them was like‚ well‚ I';m entitled. They were like‚ if you talk about it‚ you';re anti-Semitic. I am doing this to protect myself. Here';s the thing‚ every time Israel say like Israel have the right to defend itself‚ Israel had the right to exist‚ and I want to say like Israel have the right to go F itself.AMANPOUR: That';s your stand-up. It';s not your stand-up‚ actually.YOUSSEF: It';s not.

Syndicated radio host Mark Levin tore into prominent CNN Biden flack Dana Bash for trying to gaslight viewers on the dangers of the White House censorship regime. Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told CNN anchor Erin Burnett April 1 to her dismay that it was in fact President Joe Bidens censorship regime‚ not former President Donald Trump‚ that presented the bigger threat to America. Kennedy pointed out the Biden administrations history of jawboning Big Tech companies like Twitter and Facebook to go after the presidents political opponents. Bash‚ clearly triggered‚ pathetically tried to fact-check Kennedy the next day on CNNs Inside Politics. Her argument pretty much amounted to excusing Biden because he supposedly wasnt personally involved in directing his agencies to pressure social media companies and the censorship collusion was only engineered towards fighting so-called ";false information"; about COVID-19. Yes‚ you read that right.Levin wasnt having it during the April 2 edition of his radio show: [Bash is] a hack mouthpiece who burps up the usual left-wing‚ Democrat Party talking points.Nothing to see here‚ claimed Bash during her segment repudiating Kennedy: Joe Biden wasnt setting out to censor Kennedys speech or his political critics. Rather‚ Bash brazenly whitewashed‚ His administration was encouraging social media sites to monitor and take down [censor] false information about the COVID-19 pandemic. Theres no evidence that Biden himself was involved‚ as if agencies censoring on Bidens behalf by proxy is somehow any better and absolves the presidents culpability. Levin took Bash to school. What kind of a stupid comment is that‚ he rebuked. Did you [Bash] sit in on all the meetings? Is Biden going to say‚ Yeah I told them to do that? What kind of a stupid comment is that?Listen to Mark Levin ripping apart CNN';s gaslighting on Biden';s censorship regime below!Levin flipped Bashs argument on its head. If Biden didnt want [the government censorship] to happen and he has newspapers and briefers and press people all around him he could have stopped it. But he didnt‚ the radio host said.Despite Bashs assertions to the contrary‚ Biden did go after Kennedys speech‚ as Levin pointed out. What [Bash] is not saying is that when you censor the entire discussion [on COVID-19] you certainly are censoring Robert Kennedy Jr. and others‚ he said. But theres more. Bash must have memory-holed the spectacle of former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki going on camera during a 2021 press briefing to regurgitate the findings from a report by the dystopian fanatics at theleftist Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH)‚ which explicitly named Kennedy as one of the so-called Disinformation Dozen on COVID-19. Theres about twelve people who were producing 65 percent of anti-vaccine misinformation on social media platforms‚"; said Psaki parroting CCDHs targeting of Kennedy and others.";There';s about 12 people who are producing 65% of vaccine misinformation on social media platforms.";After our research was used by the @WhiteHouse @PressSec‚ we joined @CBS @CBSThisMorning with @GayleKing to explain how social media is a misinformation super spreader pic.twitter.com/GcKLtLy9y7 Center for Countering Digital Hate (@CCDHate) July 16‚ 2021Bashs own colleague‚ Senior Media Reporter Oliver Darcy‚ released a story in 2021 with a headline that completely upended her gaslighting: Facebook takes action against disinformation dozen after White House pressure. Oops. But Biden didn';t target Kennedys speech‚ right Bash? [Emphasis added.] Levin continued to rip apart Bashs so-called fact-check‚ which he dismissed as pretty funny: So Dana Bash‚ Im going to fact-check you. Number one: Joe Biden was in fact trying to censor people. Why else would he set up that [Disinformation Governance] Board at DHS‚ Levin pointed out. Number two: Yes‚ [Bidens] departments and agencies were working with Twitter‚ Facebook‚ Google and others to try and prevent political speech political speech and that includes the [Hunter Biden] laptop issue. Levin also noted Bashs apparent ignorance to the court preliminaryopinions from Louisiana District Court Judge Terry A. Doughty and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in the ongoing Murthy v. Missouri controversy outlining the terrifying political censorship regime in the Biden administration that the CNN anchor pretended wasnt a threat. Doughty‚ in his opinion‚ wrote that the evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario‚ adding that during the COVID-19 pandemic the U.S. government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian Ministry of Truth.You make it sound so harmless Dana‚ Levin remarked. No kidding.Conservatives are under attack. Contact your representatives and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency and an equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored‚ contact us at the Media Research Center contact form‚ and help us hold Big Tech accountable.

During his 2005 confirmation hearings‚ Chief Justice John Roberts compared the role of the Supreme Court to that of an umpire calling balls and strikes. But what happens when the umpire allows one team more at-bats than the other? Once again‚ the much-vaunted conservative Supreme Court is a one-way ratchet for left-wing litigation. Some things never change.When Donald Trump was president‚ not a single major administrative policy went unchallenged by the officiously litigious left-wing legal movement. I cannot recall a time when the lefties were denied standing to sue‚ whether the issue was related to health care‚ labor‚ the environment‚ or immigration. The courts even granted standing to foreign nationals!If were going to follow the old rules from the 1790s‚ they should be applied equally to everyone.Fast-forward to last weeks oral arguments in FDA v. Alliance Hippocratic Medicine‚ when‚ lo and behold‚ seven justices appear to believe Texas doctors lack standing to challenge the FDAs sanction of an abortion drug‚ which was approved on the absurd pretense that pregnancy is a serious or life-threatening illnesses.The FDAs actions were clearly unlawful. Regulators approved the drug mifepristone in 2000. They made changes in 2016 and 2021‚ removing the need for in-person doctor visits as well as limits on how far along a pregnancy could be. The FDA skirted the law in each instance by relying on a regulatory process reserved exclusively for drugs that treat serious or life-threatening illnesses.Even the Population Council‚ which led the drive for FDA approval of mifepristone in 2000‚ disagreed with the agencys process. They said pregnancy is not an illness. They also worried that a court might stop the approval.Well‚ it took until April 7‚ 2023‚ at the behest of pro-life doctors from Alliance Hippocratic Medicine‚ for Federal District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk to rule that the FDAs approval process was illegal. In a partial reversal‚ the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the original approval was OK but that the district court was correct in asserting that the expansions of 2016 and 2021 were unlawful.Enter the Supreme Court‚ which in December granted the appeal to reverse the better part of the Fifth Circuits ruling but not the part reversing Kacsmaryk. This‚ as I noted at the time‚ was an ominous sign.Last weeks oral arguments were even more ominous. Nobody ever doubted the standing of doctors challenge the approval of a drug they believed to be dangerous and permitted illegally. Niether Kacsmaryk nor the Fifth Circuit judges raised questions about the Alliance doctors right to sue over safety concerns. Mifepristones manufacturer concedes that between 100‚000 and 350‚000 (between 2% and 7%) of users required surgery due to an adverse reaction to the drug. The FDAs own label states that between 2.9% and 4.6% of women will end up in an emergency room.Yet the three Trump appointees on the high court seemed to agree with the chief justice and three liberal appointees during oral arguments that the doctors should have no standing to sue.Justice Neil Gorsuch expressed concern about a rash of sweeping court injunctions in recent years and that this case may be ";a prime example of turning what could be a small lawsuit into a nationwide legislative assembly on an FDA rule or any other federal government action."; Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh also implied that because the doctors are not forced to prescribe mifepristone‚ they should have no standing.I understand the aim to keep courts from making the gravest national decisions. But we cant accept judges unfairly favoring one political side on who can go to court. If were going to follow the old rules from the 1790s‚ they should be applied equally to everyone. Its absurd to say doctors cant challenge the way a risky drug was approved when weve allowed court challenges on a wide range of rules.For example‚ environmental legal defense groups obtain easy standing to sue against any environmental regulation they believe would result in aesthetic injury to practically any random plaintiff asserting he will no longer be able to look at a plant because of some EPA policy.More to the point‚ the Supreme Court in 1992 ruled in Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife: The desire to use or observe an animal species‚ even for purely aesthetic purposes‚ is undeniably a cognizable interest for purpose of standing. While denying standing to any random bystander in that case‚ the court said standing would extend to people who work with animals. By the courts own logic‚ doctors working with patients should certainly have standing to challenge the approval process of a drug known to send patients to the ER.Given the option‚ many of us would tighten the rules of standing. But name a single time these supposedly conservative justices enforced standing rules against absurd cases from the left.Instead‚ these jurists continue to accept appeals to overturn good Fifth Circuit decisions while overturning the will of the people of Texas when their government tries to secure the border. Recently‚ the court‚ through a cleverly written concurrence by Justice Barrett‚ got the Fifth Circuit to reverse its decision to allow Texass SB4‚ an immigration enforcement law‚ to remain in force pending a trial on the laws merits. Trumps three appointees are‚ to varying degrees‚ playing both ends of a doctrine to deny conservatives political victories flowing from legal disputes. The examples are now too numerous to count. At some point‚ we need to ask whether the likes of Kavanaugh and Barrett really have a legal method to their madness or if they are simply jockeying opinions to avoid being tarred as right-wing extremists in their elite social circles.