Watch &; share this harrowing story! Alex Jones takes a call from a nurse who claims to have held the massive blood clots from the COVID shots in his hands: Don’t miss: Sweeping Plan for Global Censorship Exposed

"There is nothing more important than preserving the integrity of our election system" A New York state lawmaker says she’s found ‘smoking gun’ evidence that New York City is trying to illegally register migrants to vote in upcoming elections. “On page 50 of this contract‚ there is an entire section dedicated to voter registration‚” said Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) on Sunday‚ after she and four other Staten Island Republicans claimed a city contract with a nonprofit hired to run a Staten Island shelter includes a stipulation that voter registration forms are to be distributed among asylum seekers. “We believe this is the smoking gun that proves what we’ve been saying all along — that the city intends to register non-citizens to vote.” 🚨 NEWS: My office has uncovered #NYC's secret scheme to potentially register tens of thousands of migrants to vote in our elections. Take a look at this contract between @HFH_NYC‚ the "non-profit" that kicked out seniors to house migrants‚ &; the City of New York ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/Hr1Vzx17fw— Office of Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (@RepMalliotakis) December 3‚ 2023 The contract in question‚ between the city and Homes for Homeless‚ governs the operation of the shelter at the site of a shuttered nursing home in Midland beach.VasoBeet is now 40% OFF! This beetroot-based supplement was created to provide you with all the benefits of this nutrient-dense vegetable in one easy dose! According to Malliotakis‚ who obtained the document via a state Freedom of Information Law request‚ includes a provision that the nonprofit will act in accordance with the NYC charter‚ which states that they “shall provide and distribute voter registration forms to all persons‚” which are to be made available in Spanish and Chinese. In another portion‚ the nonprofit “shall not inquire about a client or potential client’s immigration status” unless it pertains to the services in question. It is unclear if the language is standard in city contracts for shelter and housing services.Under city law‚ Big Apple voters must be US citizens‚ have been a New York City resident for at least 30 days and be at least 18 years of age before Election Day.A measure passed overwhelmingly by the City Council in December 2021‚ opened the door for green card holders and other legal non-residents to qualify to vote in local elections — although not in state or national races — but was struck down by a Staten Island judge.Supreme Court Judge Ralph Porzio issued a permanent injunction blocking the law in June 2022‚ but that ruling is being appealed by Mayor Eric Adams’ administration. –NY Post While it’s unclear if the language is standard in city contracts for shelter and housing services‚ the city’s Department of Social Services hit back on Sunday‚ saying in a statement “These allegations are false and baseless. DHS is legally required to include language around voter registration in shelter contracts and this guidance applies only to eligible clients who are citizens‚ and would clearly not apply to asylum seekers in shelter.” What? “They are bringing to you voter registration of people who are here illegally‚ and as soon as they’re here for 30 days‚ how is it they’re entitled to vote?” said State Assemblyman Sam Pirozzolo in comments to reporters. “What’s the first thing they’re going to vote for? Better hotel rooms?” he quipped. “How do they even understand the American system of government?“ “There is nothing more important than preserving the integrity of our election system‚” Malliotakis said in a statement. “The right to vote is a sacred right given only to United States citizens‚ and certainly not one provided to those who crossed over our border illegally and made their way to New York City last month. The City better not be acting in violation of the judge’s ruling that struck down the noncitizen voting law that would have allowed 800‚000 noncitizens with a Green Card or Work Authorization and who have resided in New York City for 30 days‚ to vote.” And watch the press conference here.

For over two years‚ the media and government officials have been peddling dangerous misinformation — the very sin they accuse of the conspiracy web of committing — about COVID-19 posing a higher risk to young people than the vaccine. After releasing my three-part series earlier this year showing how multiple media outlets refused to platform dissent on the Covid vaccine‚ I was asked on multiple podcasts why this was the case. Ideological groupthink‚ fear of exacerbating institutional distrust‚ and financial motives were on my list of potential explanations‚ but I did not have concrete evidence. As I highlighted in my first piece‚ the responses I got from editors claiming their publication’s “pro-vaccine” allegiance was quite jarring. More than anything else‚ a publication should be “pro-truth” — whether that means highlighting the astounding benefits of a therapeutic or exposing its serious side effects. The idea that a whole media corporation would take a firm stance on a novel‚ experimental product is antithetical to the core purpose of journalism. As I’ve said many times before‚ we are a pro-vaccination newspaper‚ and personally I just wish everyone would get vaccinated already.Editor response to Rav Arora’s story proposals on vaccine risks As it turns out‚ mainstream media’s nearly monolithic coverage of mRNA vaccines and other Covid measures can be at least partially explained by a clear financial interest. Recently‚ independent journalist Breanna Morello — who left Fox News because of draconian vaccine mandates in New York City — alerted me to a FOIA request filed by the conservative media company TheBlaze‚ which found a number of major media outlets were paid to promote the Covid vaccine. Such venues included the Washington Post‚ Los Angeles Times‚ NBC‚ CNN‚ Fox News‚ and several others. TheBlaze’s report received little coverage — even in conservative media (perhaps because some of those outlets were also paid by HHS) ideologically predisposed to criticize government-fueled narratives on the pandemic. As The Blaze reports:Survival Shield X-2 is now 25% OFF! Treat your body with super high-quality nascent iodine &; enjoy one of nature's greatest essentials! Hundreds of news organizations were paid by the federal government to advertise for the vaccines as part of a “comprehensive media campaign‚” according to documents TheBlaze obtained from the Department of Health and Human Services. The Biden administration purchased ads on TV‚ radio‚ in print‚ and on social media to build vaccine confidence‚ timing this effort with the increasing availability of the vaccines. During the vaccine rollout‚ the Biden administration made a number of efforts to bolster vaccination rates. The US Department of Health and Human Services’ COVID-19 Public Education Campaign states they employed “both paid advertising and media interviews‚ presentations‚ radio/TV tours‚ and other public events to educate people about the importance of vaccination.” The L.A Times – an outlet funded by HHS to promote Covid vaccines – runs a morally reprehensible column justifying mockery of ‘anti-vaxxer’ deaths. The HHS website contains public access to all vaccine campaign advertisements for media outlets and beyond. One past advertisement promotes Covid vaccination in children‚ featuring a montage of selected medical doctors stating in unison‚ We can all agree on this: you can trust the Covid vaccine for yourself‚ or your kids‚ or your grandkids….I mean it from the heart. In another ad directed to parents‚ HHS’ selection of doctors state‚ We want you to know‚ Covid vaccines are ‘safe and effective’.’ My grandkids are vaccinated…what’s not safe is getting Covid. Is it ethical for the government to dubiously claim Covid vaccines are uniformly beneficial for kids‚ and contracting Covid is far less “safe” than getting your child double-vaccinated? No such randomized clinical evidence exists suggesting the benefits of the Covid vaccine outweigh the harms in young cohorts with a nearly zero risk of serious outcomes. The concentrated risk of myocarditis in boys and menstrual irregularities in girls suggest the Covid vaccine may be harmful on net. Moreover‚ is it ethical (for either party) for the federal government to advertise such medical misinformation on platforms allegedly committed to investigating the truth and holding the powerful accountable? HHS advertisement on the updated Covid booster A new government ad on the HHS website now promotes the updated Covid vaccine. It falsely claims the new booster shot prevents long Covid and hospitalization when the only available evidence from Pfizer and Moderna are rat studies and a 50-person trial (with an unexplained 2% rate of serious adverse events). Rather than critically covering such propagandistic attempts to promote a longitudinally ineffective therapeutic with a 1 in 800 serious adverse event rate‚ major media outlets allowed the federal government to freely spread its misinformation on their platform. The New York Times’ reporting on vaccine-induced myocarditis‚ for example‚ downplayed the side effect at every sight and compared it to misleadingly higher rates of Covid-induced myocarditis: For over two years‚ the media and government officials have been peddling dangerous misinformation — the very sin they accuse of the conspiracy web of committing — about COVID-19 posing a higher risk to young people than the vaccine. Instead of examining age‚ gender‚ and health-stratified risk-benefit ratios‚ they elementarily look at aggregate data and cherry-pick seemingly beneficial outcomes to justify their “Everyone should get vaccinated!” campaign. A few of umpteen examples: CNBC: “Myocarditis risk higher after Covid infection than Pfizer or Moderna vaccination‚ CDC finds” Reuters: “Higher risk of heart complications from COVID-19 than vaccines -study” CNN: “Pediatric cardiologists explain myocarditis and why your teen should still get a Covid-19 vaccine” The Conversation: “Myocarditis: COVID-19 is a much bigger risk to the heart than vaccination” As an admittedly biased Zoomer‚ one of the most discrediting media assault campaigns grew in opposition to Joe Rogan’s claim in a June 2021 podcast that healthy 21-year-olds didn’t need the vaccine. Over two years later‚ Rogan’s judgment has been vindicated — as it was at the time — given the 0.003% mortality risk among 20-year-olds and unusually high rates of myocardial and menstrual-related vaccine adverse events. However‚ the mainstream media ecosystem conducted a fierce reputational decapitation in response to Rogan’s impermissible dissent from the CDC and Pfizer’s edicts: The Washington Post: Joe Rogan is using his wildly popular podcast to question vaccines. Experts are fighting back. The Atlantic: Joe Rogan’s Show May Be Dumb. But Is It Actually Deadly? Today: Dr. Fauci says Joe Rogan ‘incorrect’ to tell young people not to get vaccinated NBC: Joe Rogan’s Covid vaccine misinfo matters The United States wasn’t alone in spending large sums of taxpayer dollars to promote its agenda. The Trudeau government invested over $600‚000 in hiring social media influencers to advance federal directives‚ including the push for Canadians to get vaccinated and boosted. As CTV reports‚ Health Canada spent the most on hiring influencers to promote government information; $130‚600 was spent towards an “influencer campaign in support of the COVID-19 vaccination marketing and advertising campaign.” None of this is to mention Pfizer’s vaccine campaigns paying celebrities to rhapsodize about marvellously ‘safe and effective’ mRNA inoculation. Travis Kelce — a professional football player watched and revered by many young American men in particular — promoted getting the updated booster shot and flu vaccine in the same visit. The journalists I grew up admiring — such as Megyn Kelly‚ Glenn Greenwald‚ Alex Berenson (Unreported Truths)‚ and Matt Taibbi (Racket News) — were known for challenging consensus and providing novel perspectives on complex sociopolitical topics. I relied on select journalistic outlets and individual commentators for an honest‚ independent evaluation of the facts. The heavily biased coverage of race relations and criminal justice issues in 2020 following the tragic death of George Floyd was self-discrediting but hardly surprising given the dominance of identity politics in elite liberal discourse. The deterioration of journalistic standards during the vaccine rollout beginning in 2021‚ however‚ was particularly disorienting. The Washington Post‚ NBC‚ and the New York Times should have held the Biden administration’s feet to the fire for promoting experimental vaccines in all Americans irrespective of risk and continued revelations regarding concerning side effects. They miserably failed to do so. The last standing bulwark against government propaganda and censorship is crumbling before our eyes‚ losing relevance by the month. Perhaps a solution for media institutions to earn back credibility is to critically cover federal agencies misinforming the public rather than take funds to promote their agendas. Just a thought. Republished from the author’s Substack.

Sen. Joni Ernst slammed the Biden administration’s “failing” border policies after the incident. A wave of frustration has swept over Army and Navy fans who had planned to attend the much-anticipated Army-Navy game at Gillette Stadium this December. Several military families and veterans have found their hotel reservations unexpectedly canceled‚ with the rooms being allocated to accommodate illegal immigrants under Massachusetts’ “right-to-shelter” law. According to reports from American Military News‚ Washington Examiner‚ and FAIR‚ the cancellation of hotel reservations is a direct result of the state’s right-to-shelter law. This law requires that adequate housing be provided for homeless families and immigrants‚ even those who have entered the country illegally. Consequently‚ many hotels in the area are currently occupied by these groups‚ leaving fans and service members without accommodations for the game. The Washington Examiner noted that these cancellations are legal under Massachusetts law‚ but the influx of illegal immigrants from the southern border has created an unprecedented situation. The displacement of military families and veterans has sparked controversy and raised questions about the implementation and impacts of the right-to-shelter law. CBS News Boston reported that one travel agent had at least 70 of his reservations impacted by this situation. The scale of the issue is significant and has led to widespread disappointment among those who had planned to attend the game. RELATED: Military Veterans &; Families Have Hotel Reservations For Army-Navy Football Game Canceled To Make Room For Illegal ImmigrantsSave 40% on DNA Force Plus NOW! Try it today and see why so many listeners have made it an essential part of their daily routine! Fox News highlighted that Massachusetts’ right-to-shelter law ensures migrants and homeless families have somewhere to live. However‚ the current situation has put a spotlight on the potential drawbacks of such a policy‚ with veterans and military families being affected. Critics of the current administration‚ such as Senator Joni Ernst‚ have used this incident to highlight what they see as failings in border control policies. In a statement reported by the Washington Examiner‚ Ernst criticized President Biden for allowing cities to be “overrun by illegal immigrants to such an extent that it is keeping our veterans from being able to attend the Army-Navy game.” The situation has stirred a national conversation about immigration policies‚ state laws‚ and their impacts on American citizens. As military families and veterans grapple with the repercussions of these policies‚ it remains to be seen how this issue will be addressed moving forward.

"We survived a Trump administration. Would we survive another? Yes." If one needs an indicator of just how terrible things are going for the Biden administration‚ former CNN host and Democrat darling‚ Chris Cuomo‚ says he’d be “open” to voting for Donald Trump over Biden. In a recent podcast‚ Cuomo was asked about whether the United States would “survive” another term with President Trump‚ to which Cuomo replied: “We survived a Trump administration. Would we survive another? Yes.” “And for people who are now going to attack me and say‚ what are you talking about? Trump is like this crazy man. Well‚ look‚ you know‚ as Patrick says‚ the data is the data. Nobody was trying to kill us when Trump was president in a way that they’re not now‚” he told Patrick Bet-David‚ Adam Sosnik‚ Tom Ellsworth and Vincent Oshana. “So you’re open to a Trump vote?” asked one of the hosts. “I am always open. And I’ll tell you this. People say … ‘you’ve never voted for a Republican in your life.’ Wrong.”Alex Jones' latest bestselling book 'The Great Awakening' is NOW AVAILABLE! Secure your limited edition autographed today! “The first vote I ever cast was for a Republican‚” Cuomo continued. Watch the podcast discussion below: Cuomo‚ currently a host for NewsNation‚ was suspended indefinitely by CNN in 2021 over allegations that he helped cover up his brother’s sexual harassment allegations. Cuomo is suing the network for $125 million‚ claiming that his ouster was “unlawful.” “It should be obvious by now that Chris Cuomo did not lie to CNN about helping his brother‚” said Cuomo’s lawyer earlier this month. “In fact‚ as the limited information released from Warner Media’s investigation makes clear‚ CNN’s highest-level executives not only knew about Chris’ involvement in helping his brother but also actively assisted the governor‚ both through Chris and directly themselves.” Sweeping Plan for Global Censorship Exposed

An appeal on First Amendment grounds is underway. In a decision that shows some consideration of free speech rights‚ a federal appellate court has halted the 7-month incarceration of Douglass Mackey. Mackey became the focus of legal proceedings after sharing a satirical meme during the presidential run-up in 2016 that suggested Hillary Clinton supporters could place their votes through text messages. The stay of his sentence was signed by Judge Omar Williams of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut as per an official Motion Order. The Motion Order outlined the following critical steps: Mackey will formally surrender‚ and the District Court will then set the guidelines for his release. Any future detention petitions can be made without prejudice against Mackey by the government. The court-ordered acceleration of Mackey’s appeal will culminate in its hearing as soon as possible post-February 20‚ 2024‚ following all due submissions by Mackey and the government counsel. While addressing the court’s decision to execute his appeal on X‚ Mackey expressed optimism. He emphasized that contrary to the prosecution’s classification of his appeal as frivolous‚ the appellate court inferred that his case has “substantial” and “debatable” issues that may‚ if ruled in his favor‚ invalidate his conviction.Alex Jones' latest bestselling book 'The Great Awakening' is NOW AVAILABLE! Secure your limited edition autographed today! In a statement overflowing with gratitude‚ Mackey convened his dedication to fight‚ even if it meant moving his case to the Supreme Court. President Donald Trump spoke out against the prosecution of Mackey on Truth Social. “Joe Biden and the radical left Democrats are trying to pose as the defenders of democracy but in fact they’re the ones destroying our democracy‚” President Trump said in the video. “Crooked Joe and his henchmen have tried to shut down free speech with a massive government censorship operation to silence their critics. They’re putting Douglas Mackey in jail for sharing a joking meme about Hill Clinton seven years ago.” BREAKING: President Trump releases a new video standing up for free speech and Douglass Mackey. He also finds common cause with Mackey relating his own political persecution to the Regime’s targeting of conservatives. pic.twitter.com/IDuGhJxo7e— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) December 5‚ 2023 Sweeping Plan for Global Censorship Exposed

63 illegal migrants from Dominican Republic‚ Haiti busted on 'yola' bound for Puerto Rico Customs and Border Protection (CBP) intercepted a ramshackle vessel carrying more than 60 illegal migrants‚ including five previously deported felons‚ over the weekend near Puerto Rico. The bust unfolded on December 1 in waters off the southwestern coast of the U.S.-controlled island. Agents aboard two CBP Air and Marine Operations (AMO) boats teamed up with a Puerto Rico Police Department Fuerzas Unidas de Rapida Accion unit to stop a “yola” with 63 passengers onboard‚ all of whom hailed from the Dominican Republic and Haiti and were illegally present in U.S. territory. “Agents escorted the vessel to the AMO boat station‚ where Ramey Sector Border Patrol Agents arrested 63 undocumented migrants: 48 males and 6 females from the Dominican Republic‚ and 8 males and 1 female from Haiti‚” CBP explained in a press release. During processing‚ agents discovered that five of the men had already been deported from the U.S. after being convicted of felony crimes‚ including manslaughter‚ assault‚ and narcotics trafficking.Survival Shield X-2 is now 25% OFF! Treat your body with super high-quality nascent iodine &; enjoy one of nature's greatest essentials! “A voyage on a ‘yola’ is dangerous when boarding a rustic wooden boat‚ which takes on water during the journey‚” said Creighton Skeen‚ Director of Air and Marine Operations in the Caribbean. “These unseaworthy vessels are only fitted with a single engine‚ they usually try to cross the sea overloaded and without life vests.” U.S. authorities continue to encounter illegal aliens in waters around the Caribbean region and Florida on a daily basis as migrants from across the globe flock to the nearly-borderless United States. Two days prior to Friday’s incident‚ a similar watercraft carrying 33 migrants was intercepted by the U.S. Coast Guard and CBP AMO agents near Mayaguez‚ Puerto Rico. Intercepted..!! @CBPAMORegDirSE agents‚ along with our partners from @USCGSoutheast stopped this vessel near Mayaguez‚ Puerto Rico on Wednesday. Thirty three individuals were apprehended and transferred to a #USCG Cutter. Good work.!! @CBPCaribbean @CBPSoutheast @USBPChiefRMY pic.twitter.com/k64WWkAwvN— CBP AMO Regional Director SE (@CBPAMORegDirSE) November 30‚ 2023 Infowars has reported frequently on escalating migration chaos in the Caribbean Sea under the Biden regime. BOMBSHELL! Government Whistleblower Exposes Mass Deaths From Covid Shots Dan Lyman on X | Gab

from Great Game India: According to an exclusive report by investigative journalists Lee Fang and Jack Poulson‚ Moderna has been reported to hire former FBI agents to secretly control the vaccine debate. Moderna‚ a pharmaceutical company‚ is using its disinformation department to monitor what it refers to as “vaccine misinformation” online. The goal is to […]

from GoldSilver (w/ Mike Maloney): TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

The post This is what media manipulation looks like appeared first on The Funny Conservative.