'Hamas is using this time right now to regroup'

The former WWE star had previously been arrested for impaired driving at least 6 times prior to this incident

These might provide smaller explosions‚ but that doesn’t mean that this equipment is useless. Quite the contrary! Here is how to unlock and use Scatter Mines in Modern Warfare 3. Modern Warfare 3: How to Unlock and Use Scatter Mines While you might expect and be ready to make use of the infamous Armory Unlocks feature‚ the truth is that to unlock Scatter Mines in Modern Warfare 3‚ all you need to know is to level up to level 18. Complete Daily and Weekly Challenges to gain a good amount of experience points. You can also farm XP by playing Kill Confirmed‚ which will grant you experience by picking up both the enemy’s and ally’s dog tags. Once you get to level 18‚ you will be able to allocate the Scatter Mine to your Tactical slot. Image: PC Invasion While this piece of equipment is under the Tactical banner‚ that doesn’t mean that the Scatter Mines don’t carry enough explosive power to deal with unsuspecting enemies. Y...

A mob of pro-Palestine students at a Queens high school who screamed for retribution against a Jewish teacher with the gall to attend a pro-Israel rally is another warning siren that America is devolving quickly into chaos reminiscent of the French Revolution. The response so far to this disturbing incident from New York City Mayor Eric Adams‚ a Democrat‚ has been nothing less than reprehensible and cowardly.  Here’s what happened: After a photo of a health teacher at Hillcrest High School in Queens was shared in a TikTok video‚ showing the teacher holding an “I Stand With Israel” sign‚ students organized a protest Nov. 20 outside her classroom door‚ demanding that the school fire her.  The protest‚ like so many others associated with social “justice‚” quickly whipped into a riotous frenzy. Students  screamed and attempted to enter the teacher’s room for over two hours. Students admitted to vandalizing the school during this riot‚ including ripping a water fountain from a wall and shattering tiles in a boys’ restroom. After two hours of terror‚ the New York Police Department finally responded‚ including its counterterrorism bureau‚ to investigate possible threats “against the school‚” according to New York City Council member James Gennaro‚ D-Queens.  The 23-year veteran teacher‚ whose name was omitted by the New York Post from its coverage for her safety‚ told the Post that she was “shaken to [her] core by the calls to violence against [her] that occurred online and outside [her] classroom last week.”  Adams announced that New York City Public Schools had begun an investigation into the origins of the riot. The mayor then wrote that “Project Pivot teams” from a diversity‚ equity‚ and inclusion organization would lecture students on why such behavior is “unacceptable.” It’s obvious to any individual with a modicum of common sense that students who threaten the lives of others should be suspended or expelled. This used to be the case nationwide‚ but teachers unions and leftist professors deemed consequences “inequitable.” It should be noted that those teachers unions‚ which claim to protect teachers‚ have been awkwardly silent following this attack on a teacher. Social justice‚ the bastardization of true justice which suggests vigilantism against perceived disparities is virtuous‚ has been a religion preached under names such as “diversity‚ equity‚ and inclusion” for over a decade in America’s grade schools and the teacher-education programs that staff them. So why should we be surprised when it becomes commonplace for posts on the social media app TikTok to trend by romanticizing an open letter from Osama bin Laden justifying the 9/11 attacks slaughtering U.S. civilians; violence against those who look Asian‚ Jewish‚ or white; and mobs of students vandalizing and destroying property? Why should a farmer be surprised when he plants corn and then harvests corn months later? This certainly isn’t the first time that populist views of perceived wrongs to a social group resulted in violent attacks. The French Revolution was a chaotic slaughter of anyone deemed friendly with the oppressive aristocracy‚ until Robespierre himself was beheaded. Soviet purges slaughtered millions with less premise than rumors and thin accusations. The most horrific populist lashings-out in the past few centuries didn’t start with Holocaust-like slaughter‚ either. Germany’s blame of the Jews for the loss of World War I resulted in night after night of Jewish businesses being vandalized‚ Jews being marked in public and followed around‚ and substituting their ethnicity for a political label. In the 1930s‚ Germany labeled Jews “communists.” Now‚ pro-Hamas factions label Jews “Zionists.” Any group—political‚ religious‚ economic‚ or national—that lays the blame of its woes at the feet of an ethnic group always lashes out animalistically in reprisal. These reprisals are laden with social “virtue‚” promising that the offended group was driven to violence after watching its brothers and sisters downtrodden by “the white man‚” “the Jews‚” “the capitalist‚” etc.‚ for so long. The liberal “woke” call to arms over some deep-seated‚ systemic ghost in all “oppressive” groups that must be constantly confronted is no different. Many‚ like Adams‚ have tut-tutted about racial violence and crime for years because social justice claims that these attacks are nuanced and virtuous. Jay Greene‚ a senior research fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Education Policy‚ likens Adams’ feeble response to the treatment of Jews in imperial Russia: In Russia‚ Jews were chased by angry mobs in pogroms‚ which the czar either fomented or failed to prevent. In New York City Public Schools‚ we are witnessing modern pogroms of angry mobs chasing Jews fomented by the Squad‚ The New York Times‚ and university intellectuals. We’ll see if Mayor Adams is willing to do more than the czar to put a stop to this. The czar may not have pursued restorative justice and trust circles as a remedy‚ as NYC Public Schools do‚ but it would have accomplished no more than what the czar actually did. (The Daily Signal is the multimedia news organization of The Heritage Foundation) What saddens me most‚ as a former teacher and administrator in public schools‚ is Americans’ abysmal lack of knowledge of this history‚ which so many around them still know far too intimately. It’s no longer just a group of ignorant and stubborn children under the pained tutelage of teachers who must attempt to shine light on the darkness of mankind. Today‚ many teachers‚ administrators‚ and professors have cast aside these essential lessons from our bloody history‚ which cost so great a price. Authors such as Nikole Hannah-Jones and Howard Zinn created fantasy worlds wherein liberals dress up mob violence as justice‚ equity‚ and progress‚ while teachers funnel these poisonous hallucinogens to students in their honors history courses. I would beg each and every one of you to exchange the silly pseudoscience of “social studies” with the tried-and-true lessons of world history‚ as many in the school choice and classical education movements are attempting to do. But harvest time is already here. An entire generation has embraced “social justice” at the expense of any person foolish enough to stand‚ no matter how passively‚ in the way of “progress.”  Teachers will be watched (and mobbed) by their students and parents by their children. Survivors of the brutal Stasi regime in East Germany be damned. Have an opinion about this article? To sound off‚ please email letters@DailySignal.com and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the URL or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state. The post New York City Students Prove Natural Conclusion of ‘Social Justice’ Was Always Violent Mobs appeared first on The Daily Signal.

You can see it with your own eyes. But Democrats and their left-wing media allies call it a “fantasy.” What is it? Election fraud. A Lawrence‚ Massachusetts‚ voter who had been turned away from the polls on Election Day and told he had already voted found out he was the victim of fraud. He checked the footage on the video camera outside his front door and saw that a woman had removed mail-in ballots from his mailbox. He called police. It’s happening in many places. On Tuesday‚ Fight Voter Fraud Inc.‚ a nonprofit voter rights group‚ appeared in Connecticut Superior Court to demand the arrest of a woman alleged to have been caught on video committing mail-in ballot fraud in the 2019 Bridgeport Democratic mayoral primary and again in the 2023 primary. The group‚ protesting that city officials pretend there’s no problem‚ also called on the Connecticut Legislature to appoint a special prosecutor. A staggering 60% of likely voters nationwide consider election cheating a problem‚ according to Rasmussen Reports. Yet the Left denies it’s happening. The Washington Post calls it a “myth” and a “fantasy offense.” Worst of all‚ the federal government is suppressing the evidence and censoring anyone who complains about election cheating.   Never-before-seen emails released by the House Judiciary Committee on Nov. 6 reveal that a government-sponsored task force is muzzling public figures‚ thousands of ordinary Americans‚ and media outlets like Newsmax and The Babylon Bee when they report election irregularities. The emails show that officials within the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department—“the deep state”—organized the Election Integrity Partnership in 2020‚ recruiting academics at Stanford University and the University of Washington to question election honesty and then instruct social media companies such as Google‚ Facebook‚ and YouTube to label the postings as “misinformation” or take them down entirely. Don’t be fooled by the name Election Integrity Partnership. This task force does the opposite‚ silencing concerns about election integrity. In 2020‚ former House Speaker Newt Gingrich objected when the state of Pennsylvania adopted new election rules during the COVID-19 pandemic that‚ in his view‚ invited cheating. He tweeted‚ “Pennsylvania Democrats are methodically changing the rules so they can steal the election.” When Nicole Malliotakis was running for Congress in 2020 from Staten Island and southern Brooklyn‚ New York‚ she posted on Facebook: “Be sure to vote tomorrow because we’re not only taking on Max Rose‚ Nancy Pelosi &; Bill de Blasio. We’re taking on Dead Democrats‚ too!” The Election Integrity Partnership disagreed and instructed Facebook to remove Malliotakis’ post‚ which it did. Even if Malliotakis were wrong about dead people voting‚ she has a right to raise the issue.   In fact‚ Malliotakis was correct. A Staten Island grand jury subsequently identified numerous instances of fraud in the race for City Council there‚ including a ballot submitted on behalf of a dead person. The emails released by the House Judiciary Committee should outrage Americans. The federal government devised a scheme to covertly stamp out public debate over election fraud just when Democrats were pushing many states to adopt new election rules in the face of COVID-19. Americans were entitled to hear the pros and cons of those rules. They still are. The First Amendment bars government from censoring. So‚ what did the government do? It outsourced the censorship to the Election Integrity Partnership. All the same‚ it was government calling the shots‚ telling third parties to censor on its behalf. Louisiana and Missouri are suing to stop the federal government’s censorship scheme‚ and that case is now in the Supreme Court. Kate Starbird of the University of Washington‚ a member of the Election Integrity Partnership‚ told NPR she regrets the House Judiciary Committee’s investigation‚ and the lawsuit will dampen the Election Integrity Partnership’s future censorship operations. No worries. Russian President Vladimir Putin is said to be running for reelection in March 2024. Putin‚ President Xi Jinping of China‚ and other dictators who don’t tolerate complaints about election rigging will find the Election Integrity Partnership very handy.   It has no place in America. Tell our leaders to crack down on election fraud‚ instead of censoring its critics. COPYRIGHT 2023 CREATORS.COM The Daily Signal publishes a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Heritage Foundation. Have an opinion about this article? To sound off‚ please email letters@DailySignal.com‚ and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the URL or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state. The post The Left Conspires to Keep Election Fraud Under Wraps appeared first on The Daily Signal.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Bill Gates‚ the World Economic Forum‚ and various “enlisted” UN agencies (and the EU not far behind) all in one place – what could go right? This time‚ the “joint undertaking” is the promotion of digital public infrastructure (DPI). Save the UN‚ which is supposed to be “the world organization‚” all these other actors blatantly represent rich elites; but a lot of their focus with the DPI push is now on underdeveloped or developing countries of “the third world.” Related: Digital ID‚ Bill Gates vaccine record‚ and payments system combo to be trialed in Africa There are two schools of thought about why this is so: that these entities and individuals are genuine‚ selfless benefactors who want to share their good fortune by‚ say‚ “making the world a better place”; or‚ that they purposefully target countries where legislation and regulation makes it easier to carry out many types of social‚ economic‚ etc. experiments than would be the case “at home.” That’s for observers to analyze‚ as DPI promoters emphatically claim only the best intentions. Like‚ for example‚ the Gates Foundation working to “expand Nigeria’s economic growth opportunities” via DPI. The ongoing experiment in this case is development and implementation of digital IDs and digital payments by the end of the decade‚ in as many places as possible‚ and that is the core intent behind the term “DPI‚” which many see as simply a UN‚ EU‚ Gates‚ etc.‚ buzzword. Regarding Nigeria‚ the Gates Foundation President for Global Growth and Opportunities Rodger Voorhies is actually “challenging” the country’s government to make more investments in creating a “DPI ecosystem.” That’s despite the fact Nigeria’s effort thus far has been described as “robust” – but apparently‚ it can “do better.” There’s no mistake the Gates Foundation is dead set on pushing this agenda anywhere it can. As reports put it‚ it is “leading a global fund-raising campaign for the development of DPI.” To challenge Nigeria’s government‚ Voorhies was right there in its capital recently‚ speaking to the Nigeria Governors’ Forum. The forum heard the usual elevator pitch for DPIs – secure and “seamless” access to various services‚ etc. Meanwhile‚ critics are warning about a sort of “centralization of surveillance” that would impact people’s financial sovereignty and other civil rights. The UN is not lagging far behind in talking up DPIs and incentivizing countries to use them‚ apparently‚ via any channel available‚ from developmental to cultural agencies (UNDP‚ UNESCO). The post Gates Foundation Doubles Down on Push For Digital ID and Payments in Nigeria appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

Lather‚ Rinse‚ Repeat: TX Gonna Roll(ing Blackout) Through Winter Again

SeeUNextTuesday‚ Roger Stone

USC Moves Professor Off-Campus for Calling Hamas 'Murderers'

New Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson (LA) certainly wasn’t getting a honeymoon at the New York Times. The paper’s chief Washington correspondent Carl Hulse was both a veteran correspondent and a long-time player of the labeling bias game‚ as he showed in his Sunday edition story. The labeling slant started with the headline: “Mike Johnson's Rise to Speaker Cements Far-Right Takeover of GOP.” One could make a game out of counting how many labels the historically biased Hulse would attach to Johnson and his “far-right” friends. Hulse even reached back to smear the decades-old Tea Party movement as irresponsible and racist‚ tracing the “Republican crackup” from there (which at least made a change from blaming Trump for everything): In early 2009‚ congressional Republicans were staring down a long exile in the political wilderness. Barack Obama was about to assume the presidency‚ and Democrats were within reach of a filibuster-proof‚ 60-vote supermajority in the Senate and the largest House majority in more than 20 years after the economic crisis of 2008. But Republicans saw a glimmer of hope in the energized far-right populist movement that emerged out of a backlash to Mr. Obama -- the first Black president -- and his party’s aggressive economic and social agenda‚ which included a federal health care plan. Republicans seized on the Tea Party and associated groups‚ with their nativist leanings and vehemently anti-establishment impulses‚ as their ticket back to power. Hulse commiserated with former influential Congressman Eric Cantor (R-VA) who suffered a shock primary defeat to a Tea Party candidate and still sounded bitter about it. The ranks of more traditional Republicans had been significantly thinned after the far right turned on them in successive election cycles... Hulse found a fair and balanced voice from….a leading labor union? “They thought they could control it‚” Michael Podhorzer‚ the former political director of the A.F.L.-C.I.O. who has studied the House’s far-right progression‚ said of G.O.P. leaders. “But once you agree essentially that Democrats are satanic‚ there is no room in the party for someone who says we need to compromise with Democrats to accomplish what we need to get done.” The result‚ Mr. Podhorzer said‚ is a Republican majority that his research shows across various data points to be more extreme‚ more evangelical Christian and less experienced in governing than in the past. Those characteristics have been evident as House Republicans have spent much of the year in chaos. Hulse preserved Podhorzer’s pithy insult: “It isn’t that they are really clever at how they crash the institution‚” Mr. Podhorzer said. “They just don’t know how to drive.” Leading congressional Republicans were leery of the Tea Party’s thinly veiled racism‚ illustrated by insulting references to Mr. Obama and the questioning of his birthplace‚ though they said they saw the activists as mainly motivated by an anti-tax‚ anti-government fervor. A move by the Freedom Caucus to block a spending measure to protest Johnson’s temporary funding bill to keep the government open moved Hulse to call them among “the most extreme element within his ranks” and claimed the move “underscored the far-right’s antipathy to compromise….” In all‚ Hulse used the “far-right” adjective (or “far right” noun) 10 times‚ “archconservative” once‚ “hard-line” twice‚ “extreme” twice‚ and “extreme right” once to describe Republicans within this 1‚280-word story. It makes one miss the plain old “conservative” label‚ which he only used twice. Hulse’s labeling slant is a bad habit he will apparently never shake.