Join Lara Trump &; Purple Heart Veteran‚ Jason Redman‚ as they discuss growing up in a military family‚ being a Navy seal‚ being an author‚ being a motivational speaker‚ patriot… The post WATCH: The Right View with Lara Trump &; Jason Redman – 11/16/2023 first appeared on Right Side Broadcasting Network (RSBN).

This recipe for rich‚ decadent Chocolate Kahlua Cake lets you have a truly sensational cake in record time. We love serving this perfect combo of coffee‚ Kahlua‚ and chocolate for birthdays and holidays. Chocolate Kahlua Cake comes together in just one hour‚ but tastes like it took much longer! In This Article Video: Watch Us Make This RecipeWhy This Recipe Stands OutWhat Is Kahlua?Key Recipe IngredientsSubstitutions And VariationsStep-By-Step Recipe InstructionsHow To Prep AheadCommonly Asked QuestionsChocolate Kahlua Cake RecipeMore To Bake And Eat View more Video: Watch Us Make This Recipe Why This Recipe Stands Out This Chocolate Kahlua Cake is one of our favorite recipes for Birthdays and Holidays. We’re crazy about the bold flavors and super moist‚ soft texture. Here’s some more reasons why we love this recipe: Quick and Easy: This recipe uses cake mix and chocolate pudding mix which makes this cake come together super easily. And it doesn’t sacrifice any flavor! Bold Flavors: The combination of chocolate‚ Kahlua‚ and coffee is a force to be reckoned with. They’re amazing together. Texture: The cake mix‚ pudding mix‚ and vegetable oil make this an incredibly moist and tender cake recipe. The Ganache: We drench this cake in a rich ganache with even more chocolate and Kahlua. Keeps Well: This cake keeps wonderfully! So‚ you can definitely make it a day in advance. We actually think it’s better the second day. What Is Kahlua? Kahlua is a traditionally Mexican liqueur that combines coffee with either rum or vodka and a few other simple ingredients. It’s often used in cocktails like Mudslides and White Russians. You can find Kahlua in most places that sell liquor or you can make it on your own. Kahlua pairs amazingly with our favorite chocolate recipes‚ because of it’s bold coffee flavor. It also has a fairly low alcohol content (20% alcohol by volume) and is very sweet. All of these things make it pair wonderfully with desserts. Key Recipe Ingredients Cake Mix – We use 1 box of Super Moist Yellow Cake Mix (about 16 oz) as the base for this cake. This helps keep this cake quick and easy. Pudding Mix – Instant chocolate pudding mix is added to enhance the chocolatey flavor and to create a fluffy‚ moist cake. Coffee – Make sure to use very strong coffee for this recipe. Decaf also works just fine. Kahlua – Our star ingredient‚ Kahlua brings that deep‚ bold coffee flavor that sets this cake apart from other chocolate cakes. Chocolate Chips – We recommend mini chocolate chips for this recipe as they melt better. Feel free to use semi-sweet or dark. Ganache – The ganache is made with semi-sweet chocolate morsels‚ heavy whipping cream‚ and more Kahlua‚ meaning ultimate flavor. Substitutions And Variations Here are a few ways to spice up this delicious chocolate Bundt cake even more with mix-ins and garnishes: Toppings: We highly recommend trying the ganache with this recipe‚ but Chocolate Kahlua Cake is still amazing without it. You cook also sprinkle it with powdered sugar‚ top it with strawberries‚ garnish it with Stabilized Whipped Cream‚ or serve it with a nice big scoop of Creamy Vanilla Ice Cream. Gluten-Free: If you want to make this recipe gluten-free‚ simply use a gluten-free cake mix. Pudding mix shouldn’t have any gluten‚ but just check to make sure the one you’re buying doesn’t. We also love this naturally gluten-free Decadent Flourless Chocolate Cake. No alcohol: This cake contains only a VERY small amount of alcohol‚ but if you’d rather omit it‚ check out our recipe for One Bowl Chocolate Cake (which also happens to be vegan). You could also replace the Kahlua with more strong coffee. Step-By-Step Recipe Instructions In a large bowl‚ whisk together the dry cake mix and dry pudding mix until combined. In another bowl‚ stir together the eggs‚ oil‚ coffee‚ and Kahlua until smooth and well combined. Using a rubber spatula‚ gently fold wet ingredients with dry ingredients. Fold in the mini chocolate chips. Transfer to a greased Bundt pan‚ evening out the top. Bake at 350F for 45 minutes or until toothpick inserted in center comes out with a few crumbs attached. Let cool to room temperature before topping. For the ganache‚ bring the heavy whipping cream to a boil over medium heat. Immediately remove from heat. Then add the chocolate chips and Kahlua‚ stirring until smooth and melted. Cool slightly until consistency is thickened but pourable. Once cake is cooled‚ drizzle with ganache and serve! For full list of ingredients and instructions‚ see recipe card below. How To Prep Ahead This cake is already so quick and easy to make‚ but we have a few additional tips to make it even easier. Take a look at our best prep-ahead tips for this recipe: The Ganache: Ganache will stay good in the fridge for around 3 days. So‚ feel free to make it in advance. Just let it come to room temperature before drizzling on the cake. Refrigerate: We think this cake is actually slightly better after sitting in the fridge overnight. You can keep it in an airtight container in the fridge for up to 3 days before enjoying. So‚ feel free to whip it up the night before! Freeze: If you’re wanting to make this cake further in advance‚ you can always freeze it. We recommend freezing the cake and the ganache separately‚ but they will both keep for around 3 months in the freezer. Commonly Asked Questions How long does Chocolate Kahlua Bundt Cake keep? Store cake in an airtight container in the fridge for up to 3 days. After that‚ transfer to the freezer for up to 3 months. We recommend storing the cake and ganache separately to keep things as fresh as possible. Just let both come to room temperature‚ and drizzle the ganache right before serving. Can I use chocolate cake mix for this recipe instead? Absolutely! If you want an intense chocolate flavor‚ feel free to use a chocolate cake mix instead of yellow cake mix. Just shoot for one that is super moist. Do I need to let my Bundt cake cool before flipping it out of the pan? Yes! We recommend letting the cake cool to room temperature before removing it from the pan just to be safe‚ but even just 15 minutes is better than nothing. Still‚ you’ll want it completely cool before adding the ganache. What does chocolate Kahlua cake taste like? This cake has a soft‚ moist texture and decadent flavor. It tastes like a classic chocolate cake with a kick of coffee flavor. The Kahlua adds a rich‚ deep rum and coffee taste that you’ll notice too. Can I make these into cupcakes? Yes! This Bundt cake can be made into cupcakes or a regular cake. The same rule will apply with a toothpick coming out mostly clean when they’re done. You can also check your cake mix box for guidance on different cooking methods. Print Chocolate Kahlua Cake This recipe for rich‚ decadent Chocolate Kahlua Cake lets you have a truly sensational cake in record time. We love serving this perfect combo of coffee‚ Kahlua‚ and chocolate for birthdays and holidays. Course DessertCuisine American‚ MexicanDiet VegetarianMethod Bake‚ mix Prep Time 15 minutes minutesCook Time 45 minutes minutesTotal Time 1 hour hour Servings 12 Calories 589kcal Author Amy Dong IngredientsFor the Cake:1 box Super Moist Yellow Cake Mix about 16 oz3 oz instant chocolate pudding mix4 large eggs room temp½ cup vegetable oil¾ cup very strong coffee decaf is fineâ…” cup Kahlua1 cup mini chocolate chips mini ones melt betterFor the Ganache:9 oz semi sweet chocolate morsels1 cup heavy whipping cream2 TB Kahlua or more to taste InstructionsPreheat oven to 350F with rack on lower middle position. Generously grease a Bundt pan.In a large bowl‚ whisk together the dry cake mix and dry pudding mix until combined.In another bowl‚ stir together the eggs‚ oil‚ coffee‚ and Kahlua until smooth and well combined.Using a rubber spatula‚ gently fold wet ingredients with dry ingredients. Fold in the mini chocolate chips. Transfer to greased Bundt pan‚ evening out the top.Bake 45 minutes or until toothpick inserted in center comes out with a few tender crumbs attached.Let cool in pan on wire rack to room temp. Cover and let sit at room temp until ready to drizzle and serve.To Make Ganache: In a heavy pan‚ bring heavy whipping cream to a boil over medium heat‚ and immediately remove from heat. Add the chocolate chips and Kahlua‚ stirring until smooth and melted. Cool slightly until consistency is thickened but pourable. Drizzle over cake. Video Notes Serve Chocolate Kahlua Bundt Cake with ganache‚ a sprinkle of powdered sugar‚ Stabilized Whipped Cream‚ or Creamy Vanilla Ice Cream. Make sure to let the cake cool to room temperature before topping with ganache. Make sure not to over-mix cake batter. You’ll want to mix just until all streaks and lumps are gone and the batter has a smooth consistency. If you tried this recipe and loved it‚ please come back and give it a rating. We hearing from you!  NutritionCalories: 589kcal | Carbohydrates: 71g | Protein: 6g | Fat: 31g | Saturated Fat: 14g | Polyunsaturated Fat: 6g | Monounsaturated Fat: 7g | Trans Fat: 0.2g | Cholesterol: 78mg | Sodium: 455mg | Potassium: 204mg | Fiber: 3g | Sugar: 49g | Vitamin A: 415IU | Vitamin C: 0.2mg | Calcium: 144mg | Iron: 3mg More To Bake And Eat Triple Chocolate Mousse Cake – This Triple Chocolate Mousse Cake is smooth‚ decadent‚ and melt-in-your-mouth good. It’s also naturally gluten-free! One Bowl Chocolate Cake (Vegan) – Rich‚ smooth chocolate meets bold coffee in this super simple‚ one-bowl chocolate cake. It’s vegan‚ but we bet your guests won’t be able to tell. Baileys Irish Cream Chocolate Cake – We can’t get enough of this super moist chocolate cake. Plus‚ there’s a light and fluffy stabilized whipped cream topping that won’t melt! Chocolate Dump Cake with Frosting – This is such an easy cake to throw together for birthdays‚ holidays‚ or just for yourself! It takes just about one hour and is covered with an amazing cream cheese frosting. World’s Best Chocolate Oatmeal Cupcakes – We aren’t exaggerating when we say these are the best chocolate cupcakes. Not only are these a great dessert‚ they also give us the perfect excuse to enjoy chocolate for breakfast. The post Chocolate Kahlua Cake appeared first on Chew Out Loud.

  In the third century BCE‚ the Mediterranean was dominated by the powers of Rome and Carthage. These ambitious rivals inevitably came to blows in a series of conflicts called the Punic Wars which would decide which power held hegemony over the Mediterranean for centuries to come. Under the leadership of the formidable Hannibal Barca‚ Carthage would bring Rome to the brink of destruction‚ and at no point until the fall of the empire would Rome’s survival hang by so thin a thread as it did with the Battle of Cannae.   The Road to the Battle of Cannae: The Second Punic War Hannibal in Italy‚ detail from the fresco in the Hall of Hannibal‚ Jacopo Ripanda‚ ca. 1510‚ Musei Capitolini‚ Rome   The Second Punic War between 218 and 204 BCE was the most significant of the three Punic Wars. Sparked by Carthaginian advances upon the Roman-allied city of Saguntum in Spain‚ the conflict became a desperate struggle for the Romans due to the fierce leadership of Hannibal Barca.   Hannibal was the son of Hamilcar Barca who had enjoyed tremendous success in the First Punic War. When the Carthaginian leaders sued for peace at the end of that war‚ Hamilcar was outraged and swore to take revenge upon Rome. Hannibal inherited both his father’s tactical acumen and his burning hatred for the fledgling Republic.   Two other traits which Hannibal possessed were charisma and daring. Hannibal’s plans were often unorthodox but his men followed him against the odds all the same. It was this combination that allowed Hannibal to famously cross the Alps‚ war elephants in tow‚ to surprise the Romans on their land. This bold attack on Italy caught the Romans flat-footed. Hannibal inflicted two devastating defeats on Rome at the River Trebia in 218 BC and on the shores of Lake Trasimene the following year. These early victories proved Hannibal’s strategic capabilities‚ but he would need more battlefield success to subdue the Romans. Hannibal had to force another confrontation where he could decisively defeat the remaining Roman forces and clear a path to Rome itself.   Hannibal’s Armies Hannibal Crossing the Alps on an Elephant‚ by Nicolas Poussin‚ (1594-1665)‚ via Useum.org   Although famed for his elephants‚ Hannibal did not use them at Cannae. Most had died crossing the Alps or in the two years since arriving in Italy. Instead‚ Hannibal’s army was made up of a mix of infantry and cavalry drawn from his own Carthaginian forces and various other allies.   The bulk of Hannibal’s foot soldiers were Carthaginians acting as heavy infantry. Carthage’s military is often described as a mercenary force. It certainly employed a wide range of peoples and was far more diverse than its Roman counterparts‚ but the lion’s share of their forces would still have been Carthaginian or drawn from any of the numerous cities and towns under its control. Sources indicate that Hannibal outfitted these soldiers with the heavier Roman armor and arms taken in previous victories‚ nullifying any advantage Rome might have had in the quality of its equipment.   The light infantry was composed mostly of Spaniards and Gauls who had allied themselves with Hannibal.  The Spaniards equipped themselves with thrusting swords and short purple tunics that made them easily distinguishable on the battlefield. Meanwhile‚ the Celts had slashing swords and entered battle naked. Also among his lighter infantry were Balearic Slingers‚ famed for their ability to launch deadly projectiles at targets at a range without the need for a more cumbersome bow and arrow. In total‚ Hannibal had about 40‚000 infantry.   Annibal (Hannibal)‚ by Sébastien Slodtz‚ 1722‚ via the Louvre   To understand how Hannibal would achieve this‚ we must first understand his forces. Hannibal’s ace in the hole was his cavalry. The exact share of his 10‚000 mounted units is a matter of debate‚ but we can distinguish two groups. The first were the allied cavalry from Spain and Gaul‚ neither of which were especially remarkable. However‚ the second group was the Numidians. These North Africans were famed for their horsemanship and were arguably the greatest cavalry force in the Mediterranean at the time. Hannibal would use them to tremendous effect in the battle to come.   This formidable mix of infantry and cavalry also possessed the most valuable of military assets: experience. Having defeated the Romans twice in pitched battles and endured countless skirmishes‚ Hannibal’s armies were battle-hardened‚ able to handle both the physical and psychological demands of battle. Furthermore‚ Hannibal’s successful leadership had earned their trust and allowed him to count on their support in the most unorthodox and daring battlefield strategies.   These three advantages of cavalry‚ experience‚ and trust would be key to Hannibal’s victory at Cannae.   Rome’s Folly Fabius Cunctator‚ Joseph Baptist Hagenauer‚ 1777‚ via Schönbrunn Palace   In contrast‚ Rome’s response to its early defeats set the stage for the disaster to come.   After Hannibal’s earlier victories‚ Rome turned to the emergency office of the dictator to see them through the crisis. Quintus Fabius Maximus was given supreme power for six months but rather than engage Hannibal again‚ Fabius focused on harassing Hannibal as he moved through Italy. This strategy bought Rome time to raise another army‚ but many Romans felt that his delaying tactics were frustrating and dishonorable. After Fabius finished his term‚ Rome expressed its disapproval through the consular elections of 216 BCE by the election of Gaius Terentius Varro.   The consuls were the two leading magistrates of the Roman state and it would fall to them to lead Rome’s war effort against Hannibal. Varro was a fierce critic of Fabius and rejected his delaying strategies in favor of crushing Hannibal outright with Rome’s numerical superiority. Our sources portray him as a brash‚ overconfident‚ and foolish leader‚ contrasted with his co-consul: Lucius Aemiliaus Paulus. Paulus was a veteran commander who emerged from our sources as wise and rightly cautious to engage Hannibal. The contrast between these two men has dominated accounts and explanations of the Roman defeat ever since.   Roman coin showing Minerva or Mars (left) and contemporary Roman cavalry (right)‚ Larinium‚ 210-175 BCE‚ via Numista.com   Typically‚ Roman consuls led their armies separately. Each consul commanded four legions‚ each of 4‚000 men with 200 cavalry‚ along with several non-Roman allied forces. According to Polybius‚ in 216 BCE‚ the two consular armies were combined and expanded to meet the unprecedented threat Hannibal posed. Eight legions would march together‚ and each of those Legions was expanded to 5‚000 men and 300 cavalry. An equal number of infantry and a cavalry regiment twice the size of the Romans’ would be drawn from Rome’s allies. In total‚ the army assembled to face Hannibal for a third time contained 80‚000 infantry and over 7‚000 cavalry. This gave them a 2-to-1 infantry advantage against their enemy‚ although Hannibal maintained cavalry superiority.   However‚ several critical flaws emerged from this decision. Firstly‚ Roman law dictated that when two consuls marched together‚ they each took command on alternate days. This meant that the cautious Paulus would be in charge one day‚ only for reckless Varro to have total power the next‚ creating an almost bipolar divide in strategy from day-to-day. The second fatal issue was the quality of the army: a huge number of the soldiers were raw recruits with no battle experience. Against Hannibal’s veteran forces‚ this inexperience could be disastrous. Their numerical superiority might also have contributed to Varro’s overconfidence‚ and possibly that of his men too‚ who expected an easy victory against an army half their size.   Prelude to a Disaster The Oath of Hannibal‚ by Benjamin West‚ 1770‚ via Royal Collection Trust‚   In early 216 BCE‚ the Romans marched to meet Hannibal at Cannae‚ where disagreements between Varro and Paulus were quickly apparent. Varro ignored Paulus’ warnings about advancing over flat terrain when approaching Cannae — Paulus rightly knew that flat land complemented Hannibal’s cavalry advantage — which resulted in them walking into a small Carthaginian ambush. Although the ambush was repulsed‚ Varro stumbling into a Carthaginian trap against the advice of his colleague seems almost prophetic. According to Livy‚ Varro was convinced that Paulus’ cautious advice was only a trick to prevent Varro from attacking Hannibal and winning military glory for himself.   By the time Paulus took command the following day‚ it was too late to turn back‚ so he encamped his army on the back of the Aufidus River and sent a smaller detachment across the river to harass Hannibal’s foraging parties. Seeing this‚ Hannibal drew his army up in battle formation to goad the Romans out‚ but Paulus refused to meet him. After some light raiding from the Numidians‚ Hannibal withdrew for the night. Paulus would not be easily lured into a fight. The same could not be said for Varro.   The next day‚ Paulus handed power back to Varro for the final time. Varro rallied his army early in the morning and marched out to meet Hannibal on the field.   Varro’s battle formation was fairly standard. He placed his infantry in the center‚ with the lighter hastati in front and the heavier principes behind. Varro ordered his infantry to be laid out deeper rather than wider‚ concentrating his forces narrowly so that he could use them to smash through the Carthaginian line. Varro himself was with the allied cavalry on the left‚ while Paulus commanded the Roman cavalry on the right.   Hannibal’s formation appeared to echo Varro’s. He placed his weaker allied cavalry on his left opposite Paulus’ Roman cavalry‚ under the command of his brother Hasdrubal. His elite Numidians took Hannibal’s right under his other brother Hanno (Polybius) or the Numidian leader Maharbal (Livy)‚ opposite Varro’s allied cavalry. Hannibal’s center was composed of infantry‚ and it was upon these infantry that Hannibal’s strategy‚ and the legendary reputation of Cannae‚ would rest. Hannibal placed his light infantry in the middle‚ but split his heavier African infantry in half and placed them on either side of the light infantry in between them and the cavalry. The result was a wider line with a weaker center. Hannibal placed himself in that center with his infantry so he could command the most critical part of the battle.   The Battle of Cannae Map of the initial fighting at the Battle of Cannae‚ via The Department of History‚ United States Military Academy   Sometime before noon‚ the battle began. The two armies advanced‚ but Hannibal’s formation quickly changed. He had his light infantry advance while the heavier infantry on their flanks hung back. He also advanced the very center of his forces faster than those around them. This created a tempting target for the Romans‚ who concentrated their attack on the protruding center of Hannibal’s advancing line.   Meanwhile‚ both cavalry wings engaged in a flurry of combat away from the infantry battle. Varro’s more numerous allied cavalry were able to hold their own against the Numidians‚ but they were gradually drawn away from the main battle as the day progressed. The Romans fared much worse on their right flank‚ where Paulus’ Roman Cavalry was soon overwhelmed by the enemy. According to Polybius‚ there was so little space to maneuver in the chaos that riders dismounted their horses to fight man-to-man instead.   Back in the center‚ Rome’s principes joined the fray as the hastati pulled back. Recognizing the weakness of the Carthaginian center‚ the narrowly-packed Romans concentrated their effort‚ probably hoping to split Hannibal’s army right down the middle. Sure enough‚ the Carthaginian center started to give ground. The inverted crescent became a straight line and then began falling into a regular crescent as Carthage’s lighter troops buckled under the weight of the concentrated Roman attack.  However‚ while Hannibal’s center fell back‚ it was no rout. Whether due to their own bravery‚ Hannibal’s reassuring presence‚ or their utmost faith in his plan‚ the Carthaginian center kept fighting as the Romans pushed them back.   Map of the encirclement of the Roman army at the Battle of Cannae‚ via The Department of History‚ United States Military Academy   However‚ the Romans had made a fatal error. By pushing the Carthaginian center back‚ they had left the heavier‚ better-armed African infantry on the wings in place. Furthermore‚ because of the Roman advance‚ these African troops were now on the Romans’ flanks. The trap had been sprung. Hannibal gave the order‚ and the African infantry turned inward to launch a furious assault on the vulnerable Roman flanks.   The battle descended into chaos as the Romans were attacked on three sides. The Numidians had tied down Varro’s cavalry so he could not render aid and Paulus’ cavalry was all but destroyed. Paulus himself rushed to the infantry’s aid‚ but it was a fruitless effort. Men were packed too tightly together to fight as the Carthaginian forces hemmed them in. The encirclement nullified the Romans’ superior numbers and soon‚ the surrounded Romans were panicking as they were cut down in the hundreds. Bravery turned to desperation‚ and the battle became a slaughter.   Livy gives a vivid‚ albeit probably fictional‚ account of Paulus’ last stand amid the hopeless struggle. Another officer tried to offer him a horse to escape‚ but Paulus refused‚ urging the officer to ride for Rome and warn them about Hannibal’s victory before telling him to “leave me here to breathe my last among my slaughtered soldiers.”   Only a handful of Romans escaped before Hasdrubal’s victorious cavalry arrived. Having driven the Romans from the field‚ they smashed into the Roman flank and cut off their retreat. There would be no escape for those who remained. Cannae was lost‚ and 50‚000 Roman and allied lives with it.   Hannibal’s Victory The Death of Paulus Aemilius at the Battle of Cannae‚ by John Trumbull‚ 1773‚ via Yale University Art Gallery   Hannibal had achieved a remarkable feat: the encirclement of a larger army by a smaller one‚ and his reward was one of the most crushing defeats that Rome ever suffered.   Polybius claims that 57‚000 Romans and allies died while Livy places the number slightly over 48‚000. About 10‚000 men were captured while the rest fled‚ including Varro himself. Among the dead were several former consuls‚ including Paulus‚ twenty-nine tribunes‚ and at least eighty other men of Senatorial rank or greater‚ eviscerating Rome’s political‚ social‚ and military leadership. Carthage’s death toll was said to be as low as 7‚000‚ although it was probably higher than this.   Engraving showing Hannibal‚ by John Chapman‚ 1800‚ via Encyclopedia Britannica   A defeat like Cannae would have broken any other power. Rome’s ability to survive the string of defeats that led to Cannae‚ let alone to bounce back and ultimately win the war after it‚ was exceptional. Various explanations have been sought for why: the psychology of the Roman people‚ the quality of its political system‚ and Roman military success on the Spanish and later African fronts of the war are all reasonable explanations.   One of the enduring questions is why Hannibal never proceeded to attack Rome after Cannae. Livy famously claims the Numidian Maharbal accused Hannibal of knowing how to win a victory‚ but not how to use it because of his refusal to attack Rome‚ but modern historians broadly agree that Hannibal was wise not to attack the city. In truth‚ Hannibal lacked the necessary siege equipment‚ while the urban fighting would deny him his cavalry and tactical advantages in favor of brutal street fighting among a resistant populace‚ many of whom would have been men with military experience.   Cannae fundamentally shifted Rome’s military strategy. Rome avoided any more direct engagements with Hannibal for a decade. Hannibal spent that time traveling around Italy with a slowly dwindling army as Rome turned to Fabius’ harassing tactics once more. Meanwhile‚ Roman victories in Spain under the young Publius Cornelius Scipio‚ himself a survivor of Cannae‚ eventually led to a Roman invasion of North Africa. Hannibal was forced to abandon Italy and was finally defeated by Scipio at the Battle of Zama in 204 BCE. Hannibal survived in exile‚ briefly fought Rome again under the Seleucid Emperor Antiochus III‚ and eventually in Bithynia 20 years after the war’s end. Despite his battlefield success‚ Rome was able to adopt a new strategy — not to fight Hannibal unless they were extremely prepared — and ultimately emerged victorious.   Challenging the Narrative Statue of Polybius at the Austrian Parliament Building‚ Vienna‚ by Theophil Hansen‚ 1874-1883‚ via EveryPixel   This article mostly followed the traditional narrative and assumptions presented in Polybius and Livy‚ which have formed the basis of the popular view of the battle. However‚ there are two critical issues with these accounts that must be addressed before concluding.   The first regards Paulus and Varro. The traditional narrative presents Paulus as a wise‚ cautious‚ and honorable Roman hero‚ while Varro is the impulsive fool who is ultimately responsible for the catastrophe. Both Polybius and Livy clearly follow this line‚ but we have reason to doubt the characterizations of both men. Firstly‚ Polybius was writing under the patronage of Paulus’ great-grandson‚ Scipio Aemilianus. It is reasonable to think that Polybius might have had a motive to paint Paulus in a good light or risk losing his patron. Shifting the blame to Varro made sense since Varro was from a relatively low-born family‚ making him a preferable scapegoat. Some historians have gone further‚ suggesting that it was actually Paulus‚ not Varro‚ who was in command at Cannae. Although Varro survived‚ sources tell us that he was well-received upon returning to Rome and was not treated with the same hostility meted out to other Roman commanders for far less devastating defeats. Others have pointed out that all our sources place Paulus on the right wing of the battle‚ which is traditionally the position of the overall commander of the Roman forces. None of these are definitive but we should be skeptical of the stark caricatures of Varro and Paulus and be cautious before trying to pin the blame for Cannae on either man.   The other question to raise is whether Hannibal’s plan was ever a plan at all. Some historians have suggested that Cannae was not the product of a clever pre-planned strategy from Hannibal but an impromptu response to a changing battlefield. It has been argued that the initial inverted crescent formation occurred because the lighter troops naturally moved faster than the heavier wings‚ not because Hannibal had planned it so‚ and the subsequent retreat was a normal response from the lighter infantry falling back under heavier Roman attack.   This interpretation has attracted mixed responses. Polybius insists it was planned‚ while Livy never voices his opinion‚ but given Hannibal’s earlier tactical victories at Trebia and Trasimene‚ along with the difficulty of improvising such a remarkable battlefield feat‚ it seems more likely that Hannibal had indeed planned effectively. Even if he had not planned it ahead of time‚ his ability to recognize the opportunity and execute it on the fly would still be an impressive show of generalship.   Battle of Cannae: Conclusion Bust of Hannibal‚ formerly owned by Napoleon‚ by François Girardon‚ ~1700‚ via University of Saskatchewan   Through this retelling of events‚ we have assembled a number of reasons to explain how Rome suffered its devastating loss at Cannae. Hannibals’ superior cavalry and experienced troops were obstacles that Rome could not effectively counter and‚ regardless of whether Paulus and Varro were really the contrasting personalities that our sources claim‚ it is evident that neither was able to match Hannibals’s tactical skill.   Hannibal managed to exploit all of his advantages to win at Cannae. He deployed his superior cavalry to draw away Varro and seal the trap once Paulus’ cavalry had been defeated. He used the trust he had built with his men to encourage them to follow the risky plan by placing himself in the center to act as a reassuring presence and to best command the most critical part of the field. His tactics neutralized the Romans’ infantry advantage and‚ if our sources are to be believed‚ played on the overconfidence and overeagerness of Varro to lure the Romans into his devastating trap. A number of factors did indeed converge to shape the outcome of the Battle of Cannae‚ but it was undoubtedly Hannibal’s ability to respond to them — to leverage his strengths and exploit his enemy’s weaknesses — that translated those from mere advantages to decisive components of his legendary victory.   From Napoleon to Eisenhower‚ from Norman Swarchkopf to Scipio himself‚ countless military figures after Hannibal have revered him for his strategic brilliance at Cannae and sought to implement his ideas into their own strategy. Having analyzed the battle for ourselves‚ it is easy to understand why. Hannibal’s generalship earned him a phenomenal victory and handed Rome not just one of its greatest losses‚ but one of the most enduring stories of military defeat in human history.

The more they persecute him‚ the stronger he becomes. During Saturday's Ultimate Fighting Championship 295 event in New York City‚ former President Donald Trump -- accompanied by Kid Rock‚ Tucker Carlson and UFC President and CEO Dana White -- made an iconic entrance into Madison Square Garden. Comedian‚ podcaster and...

Nearly 450 patients at a Massachusetts hospital could be exposed to both HIV and Hepatitis due to improper administration of IV’s.

According to Tampa officials‚ Jimmie Gardner‚ the brother-in-law of former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams‚ was taken into custody on allegations of sex trafficking.