Tired of Saying 'I Told You So'

Long before the bright lights of Lima robbed the stars of their splendor above the central Peruvian coast‚ the Milky Way dazzled with such blazing brilliance that the region’s pre-Hispanic inhabitants built their cosmology around it. Such was their devotion to the sparkling arch known in Quechua as "Mayu" (meaning "river of stars") that these ancient cultures constructed enormous temples in perfect alignment with it‚ and new research is beginning to reveal the incredible precision with which these astronomical designs were calculated.In a new study‚ researchers have analyzed the orientation of ceremonial features at a site called El Paraiso‚ which is thought to have been constructed between 2400 and 1440 BCE. Predating the rise of the Incan Empire by around 3‚000 years‚ the ancient site appears to have been erected in perfect alignment with a number of important annual celestial events‚ including the winter and summer solstices.Previous work at El Paraiso has revealed that the two arms of the main temple are set at an angle of 34 degrees‚ thus lining up exactly with the northeastern extreme of the Milky Way just after sunset on the solstice. In their new study‚ the authors identify the existence of two giant structures – one in the shape of a condor and the other resembling a “monster” – that both match this alignment.According to the researchers‚ these findings uphold existing assumptions about a pre-Columbian Andean cosmology centered around “dark cloud constellations”. These are animal shapes that ancient people perceived in the dark spaces within the Milky Way‚ and which were thought to represent supernatural deities.In addition to these two large animal effigies‚ the study authors also identified nine small platform mounds surrounding the central temple. When a line is drawn through each of these mounds from the center of the site‚ it becomes clear that the majority are aligned with either the sunrise or sunset on either the June or December solstice. The rest appear to have been placed so as to line up with the major lunar standstills‚ which represent the southernmost point at which the moon rises in its monthly cycle. Overall‚ the researchers found 13 separate alignments at El Paraiso that fell within one degree of one of these celestial events. A 14th alignment was also identified with an accuracy of 1.5 degrees.Based on the number and precision of these astronomical alignments‚ the authors insist that “chance can be ruled out as an explanation.” Instead‚ they “propose a cosmology in the Late Preceramic of solar and lunar alignments and the linkage of supernatural animals to dark cloud constellations and astronomical orientations.” “The precision of alignments means that the building of these mounds must have been directed by astronomer priests‚” they conclude.The study is published in the journal Latin American Antiquity.

If a sibling is diagnosed with Alzheimer’s‚ then there is an increased risk of a shortened lifespan in other family members‚ even for those without the condition. This is especially true for twins‚ a new study argues.According to new research conducted by a team at the University of Southern California (USC) Dornsife College of Letters‚ Arts and Sciences using data from the Swedish Twin Registry‚ the same genetic and environmental factors that cause shorter lifespans in someone with dementia may shorten the lives of siblings who do not have the condition.“We expected a different result. We expected that‚ in twins where one developed dementia and the other did not‚ the difference in lifespan would be just like we see in unrelated people‚” Jung Yun Jang‚ who conducted the research as part of her PhD study at USC Dornsife‚ explained in a statement.“We assumed the reason a person who has developed dementia has a shortened life expectancy is because the dementia leads to other medical conditions that affect mortality‚” Jang added. “What we’re seeing instead is the increased risk of mortality is not due to just the dementia itself‚ but also a whole package of other influences that the person brings to their disease.”This study is part of a significant body of work on aging and cognition led by Margaret Gatz of USC Dornsife and Nancy Pedersen of the Karolinska Institutet‚ with the Swedish Twin Registry‚ the largest registry concerning both identical (monozygotic) and non-identical (dizygotic or fraternal) siblings. Over 40 years‚ Gatz and Pedersen’s collaborative work has strengthened our knowledge on the role genes and the environment play.Identical twins share 100 percent of their genotype‚ whereas dizygotic twins (and full siblings) share around 50 percent of their genotype. In addition‚ many twins‚ whether identical or not‚ share the same environment growing up. This environment usually includes factors such as early life exposure to pollution‚ diet‚ education‚ and physical activities.In their study‚ Jang and colleagues examined data for 90 pairs of identical twins and 288 pairs of fraternal twins. In all cases‚ one twin had been diagnosed with dementia while the other had not.Previous work has shown that people with dementia usually live for about seven years on average following their diagnosis‚ a finding that Jang confirmed. But this was not the most remarkable result.The study also showed that when one identical twin is diagnosed with dementia‚ their sibling will have similarly shortened life expectancy. For fraternal twins‚ the twin without dementia experiences a slightly shortened life expectancy when compared to someone who has no sibling with dementia.The results suggest that dementia is not the sole cause for foreshortened lifespans. Instead‚ it seems a combination of genetic and environmental factors come into play. For instance‚ both twins may develop cardiovascular disease‚ which can increase the risk of dementia in one but shorten the lifespan of both.“What happens early in the life course is really important‚” Gatz‚ a professor of psychology‚ gerontology‚ and preventive medicine‚ explained. “You may not be able to change that for yourself‚ but it does seem like the message to parents is‚ make sure your kid eats healthy‚ make sure your kid gets exercise‚ make sure your kid gets an education. You’re actually contributing to giving that kid a lower chance of developing dementia 75 years later.”The original inspiration for this work came from the question of life expectancy after a dementia diagnosis. As Jang said‚ “one of the most frequently asked questions when a family member receives a diagnosis of dementia is: How much time do we have?”“We believed that asking this question in twins would inform patients and families in making their financial and end-of-life decisions as they deal with this disease that causes losses over time.”The study is published in the journal Alzheimer’s and Dementia.

This time last year‚ NASA's Orion spacecraft successfully returned to Earth. To celebrate this anniversary‚ NASA showed off stunning footage of the ship falling through our atmosphere at 32 times the speed of soundThe ship‚ designed to take humans further than we have ever traveled before‚ was launched using NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) on November 16‚ 2022‚ the first time the massive rocket had been demonstrated. Orion went on to fly for 25 days‚ six of which were in orbit around the Moon. It reached a distance of 434‚500 kilometers (270‚000 miles) away‚ traveling further than any spacecraft designed for humans so far‚ before plunging into our atmosphere at around 40‚000 kilometers per hour (25‚000 miles per hour).Humans next.Image credit: NASA.There was another first as Orion returned to Earth: It became the first spaceship designed for humans to attempt a "skip" reentry‚ bouncing off the atmosphere like an incredibly expensive stone on a lake. The approach will help the craft land consistently at the same site‚ despite where it first enters the Earth's atmosphere.“The skip entry will help Orion land closer to the coast of the United States‚ where recovery crews will be waiting to bring the spacecraft back to land‚” Chris Madsen‚ Orion guidance‚ navigation‚ and control subsystem manager‚ explained in a statement ahead of the launch. “When we fly crew in Orion beginning with Artemis II‚ landing accuracy will really help make sure we can retrieve the crew quickly and reduces the number of resources we will need to have stationed in the Pacific Ocean to assist in recovery.”Footage of the reentry was tweeted by NASA‚ though the longer view below shows the spaceship gliding down on parachutes before being recovered.            “With Orion safely returned to Earth we can begin to see our next mission on the horizon which will fly crew to the Moon for the first time as a part of the next era of exploration‚” said Jim Free‚ NASA associate administrator for the Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate‚ in a statement. “This begins our path to a regular cadence of missions and a sustained human presence at the Moon for scientific discovery and to prepare for human missions to Mars.”With all fingers tightly crossed‚ this could soon be a view enjoyed by astronauts returning from a Moon mission. Though don't get your hopes up for that happening anytime in 2024.

Long-lasting radioactive isotopes found in ocean sediments have been considered indicators of nearby supernova activity. However‚ according to one‚ yet to be peer-reviewed‚ preprint submitted to The Astrophysical Journal Letters‚ in one case something more exotic was probably involved.During their lifetimes‚ stars convert hydrogen to helium‚ which eventually becomes other light elements such as oxygen and carbon. However‚ the heavier elements require a star’s death. Supernovae are the most frequent source of heavy elements‚ with the explosion seeding them across large areas of space for incorporation into newly forming planets. However‚ we are now coming to understand that many heavy elements are only formed in large quantities in even rarer events‚ particularly the merger of neutron stars‚ now known as a kilonova. One of the elements formed in exploding stars is iron. Ordinary iron‚ Fe-54‚ 56‚ 57 or 58‚ is not radioactive‚ giving us no idea of the timing of its production. The Earth’s core is predominantly made up of iron‚ probably from supernovae that occurred before the planet formed. However‚ Fe-60 undergoes slow radioactive decay‚ with a half-life of 2.6 million years. Any produced billions of years ago is long gone. Consequently‚ when geologists find traces of Fe-60 in sediments‚ they attribute it to supernovae nearby enough that some material settled on Earth.However‚ the discovery of plutonium-244 is harder to explain. Plutonium is an actinid‚ which the preprint notes “are believed to be synthesized in rare events‚ such as special classes of supernovae or binary mergers involving at least one neutron star.”University of Trento PhD student Leonardo Chiesa and colleagues are trying to see what sort of event could explain the presence of both Pu-244 and Fe-60 in sediments laid down 3-4 million years ago. Others have looked at the same data and concluded there must have been multiple events around the same time‚ whose products became so mixed we can’t tell them apart. This team‚ however‚ believes previous analysis did not properly model the possibility of a collision the right size to produce one massive neutron star not quite large enough to collapse into a black hole. In this case‚ they say‚ the metals produced would be spread by two processes: dynamical and spiral-wave wind ejecta. These would distribute radioactive elements differently‚ creating the appearance of two events.The authors conclude two neutron stars merged 350-660 light-years from Earth between 3.5 and 4.5 million years ago. The plutonium formed mostly when dynamical ejecta got bombarded by neutrons‚ but the iron is a product of the spiral-wave wind. To fine-tune their model‚ they looked at abundances of eight other heavy element isotopes with half-lives between 1.9 and 33.8 million years.Far from requiring an unlikely set of circumstances‚ the authors think many neutron star mergers result in this combination of processes‚ possibly more than half. We’ve seen so few kilonovas‚ we don’t have the population sample to test this‚ but arguably if we can accept the possibility of a kilonova so close to Earth‚ one with these specific characteristics is not particularly unlikely.The model also requires Earth to be at the right position in relation to the collision‚ with the matter that reached us coming from latitudes between 30 and 50‚ indicating the resulting jet missed us by a long way. That clearly constrains the chances a little futher‚ but may still be more plausible than two separate star explosions close together in distance and time‚ with one being something more exotic than an ordinary supernova.Had the event been closer the consequences could have been disastrous. A kilonova within 36 light-years or so could trigger a mass extinction. As this distance‚ however‚ the disruption to the planet would have been small. The ape-like creatures beginning to establish themselves in Africa may have looked at the sky and pondered the light‚ brighter than any familiar star‚ that wasn’t there a week before. Mostly‚ however‚ they kept on evolving on the path that a million or so years later would lead their descendants‚ Homo erectus‚ to establish themselves across much of the world.The preprint‚ which has not undergone peer review‚ is available on ArXiv.org.[H/T: Universe Today]

The post 40 hilarious pets who absolutely despise Christmas appeared first on Animal Channel.

The post 30 dogs and cats that destroyed Christmas on an epic level appeared first on Animal Channel.

John Ramer‚ a father of three daughters‚ found a unique bond with Uno‚ a lab beagle. Unlike most pet stories that begin with adoption‚ theirs started with a daring rescue. John and his team at Kindness Ranch Animal Sanctuary embarked on their most significant mission yet‚ saving a staggering 4‚000 dogs. Uno was among the... The post Beagle rescued from lab jumps into man’s lap and emotionally shows his ‘gratitude’ appeared first on Animal Channel.

In a recent episode of Morning Joe‚ MSNBC host Joe Scarborough pompously cheered on gun control activist Dr. Megan Ranney as she tried to correct Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) during a recent Senate hearing in which the liberal activist inaccurately claimed gun death rates for the state of Louisiana are higher than for the city of Chicago. He also allowed co-host Mika Brzezinski and Washington Post columnist Alexi McCammond to accuse Senator Kennedy of racism for focusing on Chicago even though the chairman of the hearing‚ Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL)‚ emphasized Chicago in his introduction‚ and Dr. Ranney even referred to the high-crime city right before Senator Kennedy's question. The segment began with a clip of GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump referring to Chicago and New York City each as a "crime den‚" leading Scarborough to respond: So Donald Trump and Republicans talk about crime dens in New York City. They talk about crime dens in Chicago. It reminds me of the hearing we saw this week of John Kennedy - Senator John Kennedy was talking about the shooting range -- the world's largest shooting range in Chicago‚ and a Yale professor corrected him and said‚ "Actually‚ death rates are higher per capita in Mississippi and Alabama." He soon added: "You know what‚ he ought to visit Louisiana -- Monroe‚ Louisiana‚ the most dangerous city --  I think I read a couple of months ago -- in America. Jacksonville‚" and listed out the rest of the top 10 states for "gun death" rates. But it seemed to go over Scarborough's head that Trump and Kennedy were both referring to gun-related crime‚ while Scarborough and Dr. Ranney were both referring to all gun-related deaths‚ including suicides‚ as the MSNBC host cheered Dr. Ranney for supposedly correcting Senator Kennedy with her misleading comeback. A clip was shown from the hearing in which Senator Kennedy asked Dr. Ranney if law-abiding citizens with guns in Chicago were responsible for the city becoming "America's largest outdoor shooting range‚" leading her to defiantly respond: "So Mississippi‚ Louisiana and Missouri actually have higher firearm death rates." After a clip of her suggesting that sprucing up neglected properties might lead to less gun violence‚ leading Senator Kennedy to mock her response as "word salad‚" Scarborough jumped in to obnoxiously imitate the Louisiana Senator's Southern drawl and to laughably claim that the liberal activist had "crushed" the Louisiana Republican. This Yale professor crushed him. And let's underline the fact he's talking about the shooting range in Chicago -- she points out correctly that his own state has higher death rates per capita. Forget about Illinois. Illinois ranks like 25th or 26th. Louisiana is in the top five. Louisiana the state has higher death rates per capita for guns than the city of Chicago. Scarborough even compared her to LeBron James beating an amateur on the basketball court. But according to 2019 FBI statistics‚ the per capita homicide rate in Chicago was 18.2 per 100‚000 residents compared to 11.7 in Louisiana. But‚ if one excludes the 10 Democrat-leaning counties in the state‚ focusing on the 54 counties that voted for Trump in 2020‚ the homicide rate only averages about 8.0 for most of Louisiana -- and even that encompasses homicides in a number of Democrat-leaning cities within Republican counties. That would include Monroe‚ Louisiana‚ which Scarborough mentioned had one of the highest homicide rates in the country -- and it's long been a Democrat-leaning area. More recently‚ in 2021‚ the statewide rate for Louisiana was about 9.5 percent compared to 22.4 in Chicago. Brzezinski suggested that Senator Kennedy was racially motivated in asking about Chicago‚ leading McCammond to agree. But‚ according to full footage of the hearing‚ Senator Durbin -- whose home state of Illinois is also home to Chicago -- highlighted the chaotic city's problems in his opening comments‚ and‚ just two minutes before Senator Kennedy began questioning her‚ Dr. Ranney recalled a friend of hers who was murdered there. Transcript follows: MSNBC's Morning Joe December 1‚ 2023 7:30 a.m. Eastern DONALD TRUMP‚ REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: You look at these cities -- our great cities are -- New York City is a crime den -- Chicago is a crime den. You look at these great cities -- Los Angeles -- San Francisco -- you look at what's happening to our country. We cannot let it happen any longer. And one of the other things I'll do because‚ you know‚ you're supposed to not be involved in that. You have to be asked by the governor or the mayor to come in. The next time‚ I'm not waiting. One of the things I did -- let them run it‚ and we're going to show how bad a job they do. Well‚ we did that. We don't have to wait any longer. JOE SCARBOROUGH: So Donald Trump and Republicans talk about crime dens in New York City. They talk about crime dens in Chicago. It reminds me of the hearing we saw this week of John Kennedy - Senator John Kennedy was talking about the shooting range -- the world's largest shooting range in Chicago‚ and a Yale professor corrected him and said‚ "Actually‚ death rates are higher per capita in Mississippi and Alabama. In fact‚ if you look‚ in nine out of 10‚ Trump states‚ that you have the top 10 deadliest places to be with firearms. So it's just so funny when he talks about a crime den in Chicago and New York City. You know what‚ he ought to visit Louisiana -- Monroe‚ Louisiana‚ the most dangerous city --  I think I read a couple of months ago -- in America. Jacksonville. Look at the top 10 -- Mississippi‚ Louisiana -- number three is New Mexico. Now‚ that's the one blue state. Four is Alabama‚ five is Wyoming‚ six is -- where is six? What do we got for six? Alaska. Alaska. Seven‚ Montana; eight‚ Arkansas; nine‚ Missouri; and 10‚ Tennessee. Look at those red states. All of those red states have a higher death rate by guns per capita than New York‚ California‚ even Oregon. BRZEZINSKI: Yeah‚ I know we're kind of winding and weaving like we always do on Morning Joe‚ but can I show you that Senator Kennedy bite? SCARBOROUGH: I would love that. BRZEZINSKI: Okay‚ take a look at it. SCARBOROUGH: Thank you‚ Mika. BRZEZINSKI: You're welcome. SENATOR JOHN KENNEDY (D-LA): Why do you think that Chicago has become America's largest outdoor shooting range? Do you think it's because of Chicago's citizens who have no criminal record‚ but who have lawfully a gun in their home for protection or perhaps for hunting? Or do you think it's because of a finite group of criminals who have rap sheets as long as King Kong's arm? Dr. MEGAN RANNEY‚ YALE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: So Mississippi‚ Louisiana and Missouri actually have higher firearm death rates. Obviously‚ there's certain -- SENATOR KENNEDY: What about Chicago? Dr. RANNEY: So I don't live in Chicago. It's not my primary area of research. SENATOR KENNEDY: You don't have an opinion on that? Dr. KENNEDY: I think there's easy access to firearms combined with environmental conditions‚ lack of great education. There actually have been studies showing that when you green vacant lots and repair abandoned buildings in urban neighborhoods‚ you see decreases in gunshots and violence as well as in stress and depression in the neighborhoods around them. SENATOR KENNEDY: No disrespect‚ Doc‚ but that sounds a lot like word salad to me. SCARBOROUGH (imitating Senator John Kennedy's Southern drawl): Well‚ it don't sound like word salad‚ but it sounds like you're trying to talk like you didn't go to Oxford and you didn't endorse Kerry in 2004..." (...) And now he's going like‚ "It's like word salad." (returns to normal voice) What's so fascinating about this‚ Mark‚ is it would be like me trying to drive the lane on LeBron James‚ and then getting like jammed and knocked to the ground by just his sheer athleticism‚ and then me going‚ (switches to Southern drawl) "That looked like word salad." This Yale professor crushed him. And let's underline the fact he's talking about the shooting range in Chicago -- she points out correctly that his own state has higher death rates per capita. Forget about Illinois. Illinois ranks like 25th or 26th. Louisiana is in the top five. Louisiana the state has higher death rates per capita for guns than the city of Chicago. (...) And getting back to Senator John -- Senator John Kennedy -- went to Oxford and a John Kerry supporter and went to Oxford -- he makes a wild incorrect assumption about Chicago --  MIKA BRZEZINSKI: In a racist‚ rude way. SCARBOROUGH: -- the world's biggest shooting range‚ he is then corrected by a woman who says‚ "Actually‚ your state has higher death rates per capita than the city of Chicago‚ and then he insults her. ALEXI McCAMMOND‚ WASHINGTON POST OPINION EDITOR: Yeah‚ calling it "word salad" is just telling on himself that he couldn't understand what she was saying. I mean‚ like‚ when the facts do not back up your own points‚ then they are suddenly inconvenient to you and don't matter. You're rude or you cherry pick another set of facts to tell your story. I think what's incredible -- not in a good way -- is that people cannot hold two truths at the same time. They cannot say‚ "Yes‚ there is an issue in my state‚ and I'm doing X‚ Y‚ and Z to address it because it's a problem‚ but look at how it's out of control here‚ here and here‚" you know. It's as if they don't care about their own folks. BRZEZINSKI: The premise of this question was -- McCAMMOND: Right‚ because they're so concerned with‚ you know‚ black people in Chicago frankly.

Internet traffic cop NewsGuard has gotten worse. A new MRC Free Speech America analysis shows the notorious leftist media ratings organization is more biased against the right than ever before. MRC Free Speech America investigated NewsGuard for a third year in a row‚ finding that its 0/100 ratings scale has once again overwhelmingly favored left-leaning outlets over right-leaning ones. “NewsGuard is just another leftist group trying to censor conservatives‚” said MRC President Brent Bozell. “We have the proof.” Using the media list provided by AllSides that classifies publications based on their “right” to “left” bias‚ MRC researchers determined that NewsGuard provided a stellar average “credibility” rating of 91/100 for “left” and “lean left” outlets (e.g. The New York Times‚ The Washington Post‚ TIME‚ Vox). At the same time‚ it dinged “right” and “lean right” outlets like Fox News‚ the New York Post and The Daily Wire with an outrageously abysmal average score of 65/100.The latest analysis denotes a 26 point disparity. NewsGuard’s rating for right-leaning outlets in particular was worse than the still-low 66/100 average rating it slapped on right-leaning media across the prior two MRC studies released Jan. 6‚ 2023 and December 13‚ 2021. Despite this glaring bias‚ NewsGuard continues to try to hoodwink Americans into believing it adjudicates media outlet credibility using an “apolitical” process. NewsGuard’s treatment of legacy media outlets that egregiously maligned the Hunter Biden laptop bombshell by the New York Post during the 2020 election as “disinformation” is case-in-point. NewsGuard’s treatment of outlets who deceived readers into believing that the bombshell was fake news is damning given the significant impact Big Tech and Big Media’s censorship of the story had on the electoral outcome.  A 2020 MRC study showed that 45 percent of President Joe Biden’s voters weren’t fully aware of the Post story because the media and Big Tech suppressed it. “Full awareness would have led 9.4 percent of Biden voters to abandon the Democratic candidate‚ flipping all six of the swing states he won to Trump‚” effectively giving the former president 311 electoral votes. The Washington Post‚ USA Today and Politico are just three of the news outlets guilty of malfeasance for trying to make the Hunter Biden story disappear. Despite The New York Times later confirming post-election that the emails discovered on Hunter’s laptop were authentic‚ NewsGuard left The Post‚ USA Today’s and Politico’s flawless 100/100 scores untouched.  Apparently‚ such election interference by The Post‚ Politico and USA Today wasn’t enough to taint their perfect scores in the slightest.  Perhaps that’s because NewsGuard leadership was engaged in similar election interference on the same subject. NewsGuard co-CEO Steven Brill joined CNBC just before the 2020 election to castigate the Hunter Biden laptop story as a probable Russian “hoax.” The video clip of his appearance continues to plague the organization to this day: The string of left-wing media scandals that NewsGuard permitted to skirt by its hall monitors continues to haunt the firm. NewsGuard still gives leftist outlet BuzzFeed a perfect 100/100 score despite the expired site continuing to host the widely discredited Steele dossier that served as the nexus of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax. In fact‚ NewsGuard’s summary of the dead site’s “credibility” amounted to a hero’s eulogy. “The website for Pulitzer Prize-winning BuzzFeed News‚ publishing in-depth reports on politics and misinformation‚” NewsGuard fawned. “BuzzFeed announced in April 2023 that it is shuttering the unprofitable site.” (NOTE: Since AllSides did not include BuzzFeed in its media bias list‚ the defunct outlet was not included in MRC’s calculations.) But for media outlets on the “right” that draw NewsGuard’s ire‚ the firm appears to have no problem downgrading their credibility‚ and by extension attacking their advertising cash flows. NewsGuard wields its ratings as a cudgel‚ attempting to scare away advertisers from doing business with media and organizations that have been accused of promoting so-called “misinformation” or wrongthink on a whole host of issues like abortion‚ climate change‚ COVID-19 and elections. In so doing‚ NewsGuard effectively strips media outlets with which it disagrees of their ad money‚ slowly bleeding out their coffers.  The fact that  the leftist media ratings firm received government funding from none other than Biden’s Department of Defense makes its explicit bias against right-leaning media and organizations even more disturbing. In 2021‚ the DOD awarded NewsGuard a nearly $750‚000 contract for the purpose of investigating “misinformation fingerprints.” This is the same Biden administration that tried to erect a radical Disinformation Governance Board tied to leftist billionaire George Soros to collaborate with Big Tech companies to target Americans’ speech on social media platforms. But that’s not all.  Recent reporting also revealed that NewsGuard received significant funding from Big Pharma special interests. The financing came in the form of a funders consortium that included the consulting outfit Publicis Groupe. The Publicis Groupe happens to represent Pfizer‚ the pharmaceutical giant that has been at the center of the debate on the efficacy of vaccines against COVID-19. NewsGuard has a documented history of guarding the Big Pharma and government narrative on COVID-19 writ large‚ which in retrospect appears to be a major conflict of interest.  For example‚ of the right-leaning outlets on AllSides’s list‚ NewsGuard once again gave The Federalist the worst score with a failing 12.5/100. That’s the same score it held at the time of MRC Free Speech America’s first and second studies. After roughly two years‚ NewsGuard is still criticizing The Federalist’s questioning of the efficacy of masks for COVID-19‚ even though liberal CNBC (not on the AllSides list‚ but has a “95” NewsGuard rating) cited a study showing that cloth masks were only 37 percent effective at filtering out virus particles. NewsGuard’s cozy relationship with President Joe Biden’s administration has set off a legislative fight over the First Amendment implications of having the federal government back an overtly activist outfit that polices the internet and appears to target right-leaning media.  Rep. Richard McCormick (R-GA) proposed an amendment to the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act that would prohibit government funding from being funneled into entities like NewsGuard and the similarly dystopian‚ Soros-tied Global Disinformation Index. GDI was also revealed to be funded by the Biden administration. In exclusive comments‚ McCormick cited MRC’s work‚ stating that his “amendment in the NDAA is something we can do right now‚ this year‚ to address the censorship of conservatives. MRC’s own research shows these organizations are heavily biased against conservatives and are the leading edge of the censorship industrial complex.”   NewsGuard Scores Anti-Israel Media as More Credible than Right-Leaning Media It isn’t enough that leftist media routinely get the rubber stamp of approval from NewsGuard. It seems the firm will even let them get away with parroting terrorist propaganda to attack the state of Israel. A recent MRC analysis found that NewsGuard maintained the flawless 100/100 scores of at least four leftist outlets — The New York Times‚ TIME‚ Politico and Reuters — that irresponsibly regurgitated the false claim from the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry that an Israeli airstrike blew up the al-Ahli hospital. A U.S. intelligence assessment later concluded that Israel was not responsible for the bombing. Both the U.S. House and Senate intelligence committees also absolved Israel from the attack. Even the Canadian government cleared Israel of any wrongdoing in the incident.  But the damage had already been done. Following the shoddy reporting‚ a firestorm of anti-Israel furor sparked across the Middle East‚ and regional governments condemned the Jewish state. But according to NewsGuard‚ The Times‚ TIME‚ Politico and Reuters are all flawless when it comes to “gather[ing] and present[ing] information responsibly.” “Many media outlets have shown their true‚ radical colors‚ taking the side of butchers‚ murderers and rapists against the only democracy in the Middle East. Disgracefully‚ NewsGuard is running cover for these antisemitic outlets‚” said Dan Schneider‚ MRC vice president for Free Speech. He continued‚ “I get it; NewsGuard is out to choke off ad revenues to conservatives.While that is bad enough‚ doing this wet work on behalf of outlets that want to end the state of Israel is unforgivable.”  The Times was arguably the worst offender. Not only did the outlet run a glaringly false headline — “Israeli Airstrike Hits Gaza Hospital‚ Killing 500‚ Palestinian Health Ministry Says” — the outlet used a photo of the wreckage of a completely different structure. The Dispatch’s Jeryl Bier excoriated the newspaper for the blatant deception: “[T]he accompanying photo was not even of the hospital‚ but rather of a building in a city some 15 miles to the south.” Bier also concluded that The Times’s framing‚ bolstered by its misleading imagery‚ would “likely” lead Times readers to believe that the depicted carnage was of the “hospital in question.” The original‚ false story was plastered on the front page of the newspaper’s website with the misleading photo prominently displayed. Not only does NewsGuard’s Nutrition Label for The Times not mention its deception on the Israeli airstrike falsehood‚ the label hasn’t even been updated since May of 2022.  There is one possible explanation that could explain NewsGuard’s affinity for The Times. NewsGuard wrote in a disclosure buried at the bottom of the label that its deputy managing editor‚ Joyce Purnick‚ who is still listed as an employee of NewsGuard‚ not only worked for The Times but was married to the paper’s former executive editor Max Frankel: Joyce Purnick‚ a former reporter‚ editor‚ editorial board member and New York City columnist at The New York Times was a deputy managing editor for NewsGuard but was not involved in this nutrition label. Her husband‚ Max Frankel‚ was The Times’ executive editor‚ editorial page editor‚ and a Pulitzer Prize-winning foreign correspondent‚ [emphasis added].   Politico‚ for its part‚ never removed its Oct. 17 X post falsely blaming Israel for the al-Ahli hospital bombing. NewsGuard also just happened to release an Oct. 19 report railing against blue checkmark “superspreaders” of “misinformation” pertaining to the Israel-Hamas conflict on the X platform (formerly Twitter)‚ but Politico’s name was nowhere to be found in the report.  But for outlets like Fox News‚ the New York Post and The Daily Mail‚ which AllSides lists on the opposite side of the political spectrum and whose reporting on the hospital incident was much more accurate‚ NewsGuard gave each of the three less credible ratings than those that haphazardly ran with the Hamas talking points. Each of the three right-leaning outlets received low “Credible with Exceptions” scores of 69.5/100‚ 69.5/100 and 64.5/100 respectively.  Free Speech Alliance Members Condemn NewsGuard MRC Free Speech America tallied at least 20 of the 130-member MRC-led Free Speech Alliance (FSA) that have had their websites or affiliated publications targeted by NewsGuard’s online traffic cops. Some are speaking out in condemnation of the Orwellian firm. One of the strongest rebukes came from FSA member The Babylon Bee. The Babylon Bee Co-Owner and CTO Dan Dillion‚ who is also the CEO and Co-Founder of the publication’s sister news site Not the Bee. “We're aware that NewsGuard has given our site a laughably low trust score‚” Dillon told MRC. “It's not good for our business‚ but we take this rating as a badge of honor and an indication that we don't align with the mainstream narrative that they support‚ nor comply with the censorship complex they actively reinforce.”  Not the Bee got dinged with a 62.5/100 by NewsGuard in part because it supposedly “does not disclose that the site advances a conservative perspective that is apparent in its content.” This is grossly hypocritical in light of NewsGuard’s perfect scores for blatantly liberal outlets like the explicitly left-wing New York Times‚ which falsely purports that its over 100-year old pledge to “give the news impartially‚ without fear or favor‚ regardless of party‚ sect‚ or interests involved” still holds “true today.” This is the same publication that had the audacity to call a violent pro-Hamas protest that erupted in Brooklyn‚ New York just days after the terrorist organization’s Oct. 7 genocidal attack against Israel “mostly peaceful.”  However‚ as the New York Post pointed out in an Oct. 21 piece headlined‚ “Thousands of NYC protesters demanding eradication of Israel clash with NYPD‚” the so-called “Flood Brooklyn for Palestine” demonstration “descended into chaos as night fell‚ with protesters completely shutting down traffic‚ screaming at police and lighting small fires in the middle of the roadways.”  In another example of overt leftist bias from The Times‚ the paper tried to spin the political mayhem surrounding Biden’s bribery scandal to make the president seem like a martyr and a helpless victim of paternal instincts to shield him from the fallout: “Biden Puts Son First‚ In Spite of Political Price.” The editorial board at The Times even openly endorsed Biden for president during the 2020 election‚ which could explain its knee-jerk attempts to do damage control for him where possible‚ especially when it came to the issue of Biden’s culpability in America’s inflation crisis. What’s even more insulting is that NewsGuard admits that the newspaper also “does not disclose any ideological agenda on the site‚” despite conceding its history of consistently endorsing Democrats for president since 1956. But NewsGuard apparently has no issues showcasing its double standard by targeting Not the Bee more harshly than The Times. Dillion wasn’t having any of it: Our business‚ like many other conservative news and culture sites‚ is significantly affected by NewsGuard and similar left-leaning ‘trust and safety’ hall monitors like Snopes‚ because large corporations depend on third party ratings when deciding what content to recommend to their users. We've seen significant drops in our reach on Facebook and Google that coincide with drops in our ratings on these ‘independent’ sites‚ which all seem to come to the same conclusion that certain political views are simply not acceptable for amplification. While we are proud of the fact that these sites recognize our commitment to objective truth over narrative‚ we share frustration with other conservative outlets in the way that sticking to our ideals ultimately limits our ability to reach new audiences. Dillon wasn’t the only one to speak out. The Heartland Institute got hit by NewsGuard with an “unreliable” 30/100 in large part for rejecting the so-called “scientific consensus on climate change‚” a leftist talking point. Heartland president James Taylor called out NewsGuard for being nothing more than a gatekeeper for left-wing arguments while simultaneously masquerading as an objective journalism referee. “The NewsGuard scoring system has nothing to do with truth and accuracy but merely conveys the extent to which an entity produces material consistent with leftist propaganda narratives‚” Taylor exclaimed. “That being the case‚ I am surprised Heartland scored as high as a 30.” The Heritage Foundation‚ one of the most prominent think tanks in the U.S. also received NewsGuard’s ire‚ getting hit with a 69.5/100 score. “The political hacks from NewsGuard claim they’ll help you decide what news outlets you can trust. In reality‚ you shouldn’t trust anything from this overtly biased organization‚” said The Heritage Foundation Communications Director Rob Bluey. “Thanks to MRC‚ we now have proof that left-leaning outlets fare better than their conservative counterparts.” One of NewsGuard’s nonsensical quibbles was The Heritage Foundation’s repudiation of the $80 billion earmarked in Biden’s extremist $749 billion Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) towards hiring 87‚000 new Internal Revenue Service “agents.” NewsGuard split hairs by arguing that the onerous Biden bill simply allows the IRS to hire “86‚852 full-time employees — not all audit agents‚ as the article suggested.” The headline of The Heritage Foundation’s article was “Fact-Checking Team Biden on Who Those 87‚000 New IRS Agents Would Audit‚” but NewsGuard didn’t disclose that The Heritage Foundation did note in its piece how “Calculations conservatively assume that only 57.3% of the Treasury Department’s estimated 86‚852 new IRS agents (49‚754 in total) would be assigned to enforcement.” In other words‚ The Heritage Foundation did specifically note that not all of the new “agents” would serve in auditing functions.   NewsGuard simply trusted the government propaganda of the Treasury Department officials to claim that “most new net hires will fill customer service and technology roles‚ not auditing functions.” Apparently‚ NewsGuard was unaware that the principle “trust but verify” serves as an effective pretext for diligent journalism to hold the powerful accountable.   NewsGuard also has an apparent penchant for attacking the pro-life movement. NewsGuard targeted pro-life‚ FSA member news outlets Life News and Live Action with abysmal 17.5/100 scores. By contrast‚ the abortion giant Planned Parenthood‚ which is notorious for repeatedly portraying itself as a medical care enterprise that just happens to also perform abortions‚ managed to maintain a higher‚ “generally credible” score of 75/100. Life News told MRC in a statement that NewsGuard’s “only mission is to purposefully target pro-life and conservative news outlets with false claims and biased‚ misleading fact-checks that are little more than a propaganda campaign for the radical left.” In the publication’s view‚ “NewsGuard is designed to smear and defame the good name of news outlets that provide reliable news and information to readers from a conservative and pro-life perspective and it knows some unsuspecting people will be fooled into thinking it provides objective analysis. But it should be exposed as a fraud.”  Despite receiving a “generally” credible rating from NewsGuard of 74.5/100‚ The Washington Stand — a Christian publication owned by the Family Research Council — also critiqued the outfit for its “ideological bent.” Washington Stand Editor-in-Chief Jared Bridges told MRC that he could “see the temptation a news organization might have to moderate and even liberalize their content to raise their score and thereby be more accepted by NewsGuard's audience.” He continued: “And that's the real question: do we want to be acceptable or truthful?  There are plenty of ‘acceptable’ news organizations in America today‚ but we're more interested in high truth than we are a high score.”  Reasons Congress Must Ensure NewsGuard Does Not Receive Taxpayer Funds The MRC in conjunction with 36 pro-free speech allies have publicly called on Congress to block any funding by the government to Orwellian entities like NewsGuard in the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). “Our federal government never should have spent time and taxpayer money on censoring conservatives‚” members of the Free Speech Alliance wrote in the open letter to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA). “That which government is constitutionally prohibited from doing‚ it cannot contract with others to do.” In addition to the extreme bias the firm displays against media that don’t comport with government and leftist narratives‚ this is just one of a myriad of reasons MRC pointed out as to why Congress should end NewsGuard’s funding. NewsGuard’s government funding is unconstitutional. It is fundamental to living in a free and fair society that agencies of the federal government may not endorse the products and services of private companies they favor. Nor may they weaponize national power against companies that officials have decided they dislike‚ absent duly enacted statutes and regulations and appropriate due process.  Financing from Big Pharma created a glaring conflict of interest. NewsGuard’s financing from Big Pharma special interests casts its notorious gatekeeping on issues related to COVID-19 and the vaccines into major doubt. The Washington Times reported Nov. 18 that NewsGuard received a $6 million investment from a consortium that included the Publicis Groupe‚ “which represents some of the world’s leading pharmaceutical and health care companies‚ including COVID-19 vaccine maker Pfizer.” Shockingly‚ according to The Times‚ NewsGuard “denied any conflict of interest” and claimed that the “group’s investors have never contacted them and have no influence over the company’s rating system.” The way NewsGuard has treated right-leaning outlets that have questioned the government narrative on COVID-19‚ the subsequent lockdowns and the efficacy and safety of masks and vaccines is blatantly outrageous when viewed through the lens of its Big Pharma financing. NewsGuard has openly celebrated its dystopian collusion with the federal government. NewsGuard isn’t shy about its funding ties to the federal government. Apparently‚ it openly boasted of its government collaboration when it tried to convince Twitter to integrate its ratings system into the Big Tech platforms’ censorship operations in May 2021. Independent Journalist Lee Fang reported in RealClearWire that NewsGuard Co-CEO Gordon Crovitz’s pitch to Twitter included an “out-of-the-box tool that would use artificial intelligence powered by NewsGuard algorithms to rapidly screen content based on hashtags and search terms the company associated with dangerous content.” In exchange‚ the proposed “tool” would then redirect users to “official government sources only” on issues like COVID-19.  Other content-moderation partners Crovitz mentioned in his pitch‚ reported Fang‚ “include[d] ‘intelligence and national security officials‚’ ‘reputation management providers‚’ and ‘government agencies‚’ which contract with the firm to identify misinformation trends.” NewsGuard rates communist Chinese government propaganda as more credible than American publications. The reality that NewsGuard considers Chinese state propaganda to be more credible than American publications is nothing short of nefarious. The MRC first exposed this phenomenon in February 2022‚ and it still persists to this day. The China Daily‚ the Global Times and China Global Television Network (CGTN) and The People’s Daily— all run by the communist Chinese government — got scores of 44.5/100‚ 39.5/100‚ 44.5/100 and 39.5/100 respectively from NewsGuard. The Global Times‚ in particular‚ is the same outlet that has gone so far as to threaten Australia with becoming “cannon fodder” on Twitter. The People’s Daily is also particularly notorious for being the “official newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party Central Committee‚ and is the most influential and authoritative newspaper in China to represent the voice of the Chinese central government‚” according to OxfordReference.com. Despite being responsible for spewing propaganda emanating from the Beijing authorities‚ NewsGuard gives all four outlets the green checkmark for “not repeatedly publish[ing] false or egregiously misleading content.” By contrast‚ American publications like The Federalist (12.5/100)‚ One America News (25/100)‚ Newsmax (15/100)‚ Life News (17.5/100) and LifeSite News (17.5/100) are considered to be significantly less credible than Chinese state propaganda. (NOTE: Life News and LifeSite News are FSA members‚ but were not included in the AllSides analysis since they don’t appear in its Media Bias Chart.) METHODOLOGY: MRC Free Speech America utilized the AllSides media bias chart as a gauge to determine how NewsGuard rates outlets considered “left” and “lean left” in comparison to outlets considered “right” and “lean right.” AllSides listed 30 total outlets as “left” or “lean left” and 23 outlets as “right” or “lean right.” AllSides included the opinion sections of news websites as separate entities. MRC Free Speech America excluded any outlet that was characterized as “opinion” from the AllSides tally to keep the focus on news organizations for the analysis. (NOTE: Only two FSA members — American Spectator and Christian Broadcasting Network — were included in the AllSides analysis since their names appeared in the “right” list.) AllSides noted it has a “patent on rating bias and use[s] multiple methodologies‚” not a homogenous group or an algorithm. “Our methods are: Blind Bias Surveys of Americans‚ Editorial Reviews by a multipartisan team of panelists who look for common types of media bias‚ independent reviews‚ and third party data.” EDITOR’S NOTE: Readers should be aware that this report only uses the AllSides list to analyze NewsGuard ratings of outlets considered by AllSides to be “left” and “lean left” or “right” and “lean right” and does not necessarily reflect MRC’s characterizations of these outlets.