For hundreds of years, men dominated the major institutions in western society, but over the past several decades there has been an unprecedented shift. Today, leftist women either dominate or are on their way to dominating most of our major institutions. As a result, the way that things get done has been totally turned upside down. Even our largest corporations are now making consensus-driven decisions that are based on emotion rather than on facts. If you insist on disagreeing with the consensus, you may find yourself being “canceled”. Defending the narratives that the group has established and protecting the feelings of favored individuals have become far more important goals than getting to the truth. A few days ago, a conservative woman named Helen Andrews published an article that is taking the Internet by storm.  In that article, she equates the feminization of our society with the rise of “wokeness”… Everything you think of as wokeness involves prioritizing the feminine over the masculine: empathy over rationality, safety over risk, cohesion over competition. Other writers who have proposed their own versions of the Great Feminization thesis, such as Noah Carl or Bo Winegard and Cory Clark, who looked at feminization’s effects on academia, offer survey data showing sex differences in political values. One survey, for example, found that 71 percent of men said protecting free speech was more important than preserving a cohesive society, and 59 percent of women said the opposite. Andrews is a woman, and she is certainly not suggesting that women are bad. But she is pointing out that things have gotten way out of balance. When I was growing up, I never thought about the political views of my doctors, and I didn’t really care. But today we live in a society where politics has to be a part of everything… Men tend to be better at compartmentalizing than women, and wokeness was in many ways a society-wide failure to compartmentalize. Traditionally, an individual doctor might have opinions on the political issues of the day but he would regard it as his professional duty to keep those opinions out of the examination room. Now that medicine has become more feminized, doctors wear pins and lanyards expressing views on controversial issues from gay rights to Gaza. They even bring the credibility of their profession to bear on political fads, as when doctors said Black Lives Matter protests could continue in violation of Covid lockdowns because racism was a public health emergency. Compartmentalization is a good thing. If I hurt my arm and go to see a doctor, I don’t want to hear what he thinks about gay rights. I just want him to fix my arm. Unfortunately, we live at a time where most people feel like they have to signal whether they are for or against the liberal consensus that has dominated our society for the past several decades. The reason why the left hates Donald Trump so much is because he has become the embodiment of the backlash to “wokeness”, and that is also the reason why many conservatives love him so much. Donald Trump is not polite, and he is not afraid to express controversial views that are in direct opposition to the “woke” narratives that our major institutions have been pushing. Many conservatives think that “wokeness” has been defeated now that Trump is in the White House, but the truth is that once Trump is gone the millions of “HR ladies” that dominate our major institutions will still be there. It all starts at a very early age. Even at the earliest grade levels, our girls are vastly outperforming our boys… On average, girls in 3rd grade outperform boys in reading and writing by roughly half a grade level. By the end of 8th grade, girls are almost a full grade ahead. That’s according to a 2018 study from Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis that tracked assessments from 10,000 districts across the nation. Normal female behavior is encouraged in our public schools, while normal male behavior is frowned upon. So a lot of boys end up deeply hating school. At one time boys could at least look forward to participating in organized sports after school, but now participation in such sports by boys is “declining rapidly”… Youth sport participation among boys in the United States has been declining rapidly over the past ten years. The cancellation of sports seasons during the unscientific and draconian COVID lockdowns has only exacerbated this devastating trend. According to a survey conducted earlier this year by The Sports & Fitness Industry Association, the percentage of boys who regularly competed in sports dropped by nine points over the past decade—while the participation rate for girls, while still less than boys, has increased slightly. In high school, the achievement gap between boys and girls is even larger… Girls, in addition to being more likely to take advanced courses in high school, tend to earn higher grade point averages than boys in high school. In one statewide study of public high school students, 51 percent of graduating female students earned a high school GPA above 3.0, compared to 36 percent of male students. Girls were 1.9 times more likely to be in the top 5 percent of graduating GPAs, and boys were 1.6 times more likely to be in the bottom 5 percent of GPAs. Of course it doesn’t end there. At this point, young women are far more likely to get a college degree than young men are… In 1972, the year Title IX was passed to promote gender equality in higher education, men earned 56.4 percent of all bachelor’s degrees, while women earned 43.6 percent—a 13-point gap. By 2019, there was a 15-point difference—in the other direction, with women earning about 58 percent of all bachelor’s degrees. The pandemic accelerated that trend: from 2019 to 2020, male first-time college enrollment dropped by 5.1 percent, compared to less than 1 percent for women. This trend has enormous implications for the future of our society, because college graduates are the future leaders of our society. In other words, they are the people that are going to run our major institutions in the future. In her excellent article, Helen Andrews was particularly concerned about what this is going to mean for our legal system… The field that frightens me most is the law. All of us depend on a functioning legal system, and, to be blunt, the rule of law will not survive the legal profession becoming majority female. The rule of law is not just about writing rules down. It means following them even when they yield an outcome that tugs at your heartstrings or runs contrary to your gut sense of which party is more sympathetic. I very much agree with her. It won’t be too long before our legal system is completely and utterly dominated by liberal women… A much more important tipping point is when law schools became majority female, which occurred in 2016, or when law firm associates became majority female, which occurred in 2023. When Sandra Day O’Connor was appointed to the high court, only 5 percent of judges were female. Today women are 33 percent of the judges in America and 63 percent of the judges appointed by President Joe Biden. Once liberal women have achieved a stranglehold over our legal system, what will our society look like? That is not something that I am eager to imagine. As Andrews has correctly pointed out, even now our anti-discrimination laws essentially require “that every workplace be feminized”… Anti-discrimination law requires that every workplace be feminized. A landmark case in 1991 found that pinup posters on the walls of a shipyard constituted a hostile environment for women, and that principle has grown to encompass many forms of masculine conduct. Dozens of Silicon Valley companies have been hit with lawsuits alleging “frat boy culture” or “toxic bro culture,” and a law firm specializing in these suits brags of settlements ranging from $450,000 to $8 million. Women can sue their bosses for running a workplace that feels like a fraternity house, but men can’t sue when their workplace feels like a Montessori kindergarten. Naturally employers err on the side of making the office softer. So if women are thriving more in the modern workplace, is that really because they are outcompeting men? Or is it because the rules have been changed to favor them? You aren’t going to get sued if you don’t hire enough men or if your workplace does not feel welcoming for men. But if you don’t hire enough women or if your workplace does not feel welcoming for women you could get sued into oblivion. Sadly, many men feel as though our entire society has become extremely unwelcoming to them at this stage. Perhaps that helps to explain why men are dying from “deaths of despair” at a rate that is almost three times higher than women… Men die “deaths of despair” from suicide, drugs, or alcohol at nearly three times the rate of women. And often, those hit hardest by these trends are working-class, men of color, or both. One of the reasons why our society is such a mess today is because we have allowed vast hordes of extremely liberal “HR ladies” to run things. If we stay on the path that we are currently on, the future of our society isn’t going to be bright. Millions of young males that are being pushed aside by our society are going to end up as addicts, and millions of them will find themselves in prison. Actually, that has already happened. Millions upon millions of lives have already been wasted, and millions of young boys will soon be joining their ranks if something is not done. Unfortunately, the “HR ladies” that are now in control of our major institutions seem to think that things are running just fine. Michael’s new book entitled “10 Prophetic Events That Are Coming Next” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com, and you can subscribe to his Substack newsletter at michaeltsnyder.substack.com. About the Author: Michael Snyder’s new book entitled “10 Prophetic Events That Are Coming Next” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com. He has also written nine other books that are available on Amazon.com including “Chaos”, “End Times”, “7 Year Apocalypse”, “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America”, “The Beginning Of The End”, and “Living A Life That Really Matters”.  When you purchase any of Michael’s books you help to support the work that he is doing.  You can also get his articles by email as soon as he publishes them by subscribing to his Substack newsletter.  Michael has published thousands of articles on The Economic Collapse Blog, End Of The American Dream and The Most Important News, and he always freely and happily allows others to republish those articles on their own websites.  These are such troubled times, and people need hope.  John 3:16 tells us about the hope that God has given us through Jesus Christ: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”  If you have not already done so, we strongly urge you to invite Jesus Christ to be your Lord and Savior today. The post Has The Feminization Of Our Major Institutions By Radical Leftists Been Good For Our Society? appeared first on End Of The American Dream.

President Trump has officially cut off all U.S. funding to Colombia in response to their drug trafficking….but I have just one question. I’ll get to my question in just a minute. First, here is the announcement: Trump cuts off all U.S. funding to Colombia in response to their drugs poisoning Americans He tells the Colombian president to “close up these killing fields immediately, or the United States will close them up for him, and it won’t be done nicely!” pic.twitter.com/A6bNpeO2xO — johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) October 19, 2025 FULL TEXT: Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump President Gustavo Petro, of Columbia, is an illegal drug leader strongly encouraging the massive production of drugs, in big and small fields, all over Columbia. It has become the biggest business in Columbia, by far, and Petro does nothing to stop it, despite large scale payments and subsidies from the USA that are nothing more than a long term rip off of America. AS OF TODAY, THESE PAYMENTS, OR ANY OTHER FORM OF PAYMENT, OR SUBSIDIES, WILL NO LONGER BE MADE TO COLUMBIA. The purpose of this drug production is the sale of massive amounts of product into the United States, causing death, destruction, and havoc. Petro, a low rated and very unpopular leader, with a fresh mouth toward America, better close up these killing fields immediately, or the United States will close them up for him, and it won’t be done nicely. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President Donald J. Trump Ok, so now my question…. That’s great and all and I fully support it, but can anyone tell me WHY IN THE HELL we are funding or subsidizing Colombia in the first place? I am so sick and tired of paying taxes through the nose and then hearing how we’re still broke and our national debt is going up by the trillions every year….and yet we’re funding/subsidizing fucking Colombia? Why? STOP IT! Stop it now! Not just because they are drug traffickers, but stop it because the USA needs to immediately get out of the business of funding any other country on Earth.  Period.  Full stop. Until our debt is gone and our federal income taxes are abolished, I don’t want one fucking dollar going to another country. Not Colombia. Not Ukraine. Not Israel. It all needs to stop. Now. Yesterday. We are broke folks, we no longer have any funds to send anywhere! What part of this is so hard to understand?

October 19, 2025

PRESIDENT TRUMP CONFIRMS HE WILL SEND NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS TO SAN FRANCISCO TO CRACK DOWN ON CRIME.

Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) claimed on Sunday that he would not call for a Republican to drop out of a political race if texts surfaced in which said Republican had advocated for the assassination of a political opponent. Kaine’s assertion – made to host Kristen Welker on NBC’s “Meet the Press” — comes against the backdrop of the scandal rocking the attorney general’s race in his home state. Democratic nominee Jay Jones, in texts sent three years earlier, had advocated violence against then state House Speaker Todd Gilbert and had even suggested that Gilbert would never change political positions unless he and his wife were forced to watch one of their young children die. The Virginia Senator has condemned the text messages, but has argued more than once that he knows Jones well — and that on balance, he will not withdraw his endorsement. WATCH: Tim Kaine is asked if a Republican sent the same texts that Jay Jones did, would he call on them to drop out of the race? Kaine: “Absolutely not.” The insane Democrat lies and spin to cover for this deranged lunatic continue. pic.twitter.com/p48mpSyWMU — Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) October 19, 2025 Welker pressed Kaine on the issue, saying that critics wondered whether he would call for a Republican to drop out of the race if the shoe were on the other foot. “Absolutely not,” Kaine declared. “It is — it’s directly equivalent to things that the Republican gubernatorial candidate has publicly said, not in private texts. ‘Murder is murder, and your time will come,’ she said that in a public meeting speaking about pro-choice activists. I’ve not called for her to drop out of the race.” “The voters began voting in Virginia on September 19th,” Kaine continued. “These are fair items for voters to consider as they cast their vote, but no, we’re not calling for Republicans to drop out of races, we say apologize, you have to take account for your actions, and voters can look at the actions and look at your sincerity if you apologize. Apologies are in short supply in politics these days.” Jones did offer an apology during his debate with Attorney General Jason Miyares (R-VA), but even Democrats were commenting at the time that it had fallen flat. “Oooof. This Jay Jones sounds totally robotic and his apology and counter-responses totally FLAT. Then he pivoted to conventional, obvious, and typical Democrat attack lines against any generic Republican. His apology lacked any EMOTION whatsoever and just pivoted to Trump. This is a disaster,” Michael LaRosa, who served as spokesman for former First Lady Jill Biden observed. Oooof. This Jay Jones sounds totally robotic and his apology and counter-responses totally FLAT. Then he pivoted to conventional, obvious, and typical Democrat attack lines against any generic Republican. His apology lacked any EMOTION whatsoever and just pivoted to Trump. This… — Michael LaRosa (@MichaelLaRosaDC) October 16, 2025 Kaine has also taken some criticism for his repeated claim that he’s known Jones “for 25 years,” in large part because Jones is 36 years old — which means that Kaine is saying that he’s known the Democratic candidate since he was just 11 years old. Jay Jones is 36 years old… So is Kaine saying he’s known him since he was 11? Anyone wanna follow up on this? https://t.co/upxez7awjF — Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) October 8, 2025 The other comments Kaine referenced, that were made by Republican gubernatorial candidate Winsome Sears, also came from three years earlier. Speaking about pro-choice activists, Sears was making the argument that abortion was murder and that those who supported it would have to look themselves in the mirror and acknowledge that — she was not calling fir anyone to be killed.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) still could not commit on Sunday to endorsing Zohran Mamdani, the self-proclaimed Democratic socialist who won his party’s nomination in the New York City Mayoral race. Jeffries, who’s been asked about endorsing Mamdani on a number of occasions, told ABC’s Jonathan Karl that he was looking forward to “continuing” conversations with Mamdani — and although he didn’t rule out an endorsement altogether, the fast-approaching general election is becoming more and more likely to pass before he does so. WATCH: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries tells @JonKarl that he has not endorsed Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic candidate in the New York City mayoral race, but says he is looking forward to “continuing” conversations. Read more: https://t.co/wHsSsY4AJk pic.twitter.com/hlxOyFmicq — This Week (@ThisWeekABC) October 19, 2025 “I want to also ask you, we’re getting closer to the New York mayor’s race,” Karl began. “You still haven’t endorsed Zohran Mamdani, have you?” “I have not,” Jeffries declared. “Why is that?” Karl wondered. “Well, as I’ve indicated, I expect to have a conversation with him at some point this week, in advance of early voting which begins next weekend in New York City,” Jeffries replied. “And I will certainly have more to say about the mayor’s race and about our Democratic nominee prior to early voting beginning. Karl continued to press, however, asking, “What is though that has held you back? I mean usually, this is someone that won a Democratic primary, you know, usually it wouldn’t be that much of a question whether or not a Congressman from the city of New York, the Democratic leader would endorse him. What’s giving you pause?” “Well, we’ve had very good conversations over the last few months in advance if the government shutting down,” Jeffries said, although he did not directly address Karl’s question. Instead he referred to those conversations as “forward-looking,” “community-based,” and focused on “efforts to make New York City more affordable.” He gave a similar answer when he was asked over the summer whether he’d throw his weight behind Mamdani, saying at the time that he wanted to have “a conversation” with the candidate first. “Our districts don’t overlap. I have never had a substantive conversation with him. And so that’s the next step in terms of this process to discuss his vision for moving the city forward and addressing the issues that are important to the communities that I represent,” he said, and called on Mamdani directly to “clarify” his position on Israel. “Globalizing the Intifada, by way of example, is not an acceptable phrasing,” Jeffries concluded. “He’s going to have to clarify his position on that as he moves forward. With respect to the Jewish communities that I represent, I think our nominee is going to have to convince folks that he is prepared to aggressively address the rise in antisemitism in the city of New York, which has been an unacceptable development.” Others have suggested that Jeffries, who represents a district that is 11% Jewish, has concerns about Mamdani’s support for BDS — “Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions” — against Israel or his claim that, as mayor, he would have Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrested if he came to New York City.