Anger grows after citizens were locked out of a meeting to discuss an EU-funded project to settle migrants in Polish communities

It was one way to end the fighting.

3, 2, 1...

by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star: When C.M. sent along the following patent filing from 2023, I knew instantly that I would have to blog about it; not to do so would have been remiss. In fact, when I read the abstract of this patent, I was, as the dwindling and “immigrant overwhelmed” British population in the United […]

American journalist Tucker Carlson has warned that Donald Trump’s support for Israel’s strikes in Iran could spark an “all-out war” in the Middle East. He has urged the US president to “drop Israel” and “let [...] The post Tucker Carlson Blasts Trump Says US Is “Complicit” In Israel’s Attack On Iran appeared first on The People's Voice.

A branch of the Democratic Party revealed the location of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in Los Angeles and organized protests at hotels housing the federal law enforcement agents, a Daily Wire investigation reveals. Foothill Community Democrats doxxed the locations of federal law enforcement in multiple posts on Instagram. One post identified six Los Angeles hotels that are reportedly housing ICE agents and encouraged fellow Democrats to call the hotels to demand they kick ICE out. Screenshot Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin told The Daily Wire the department will prosecute those who dox ICE agents. “These are thugs. We will prosecute those who dox ICE agents to the fullest extent of the law,” McLaughlin said. “These criminals are taking the side of vicious cartels and human traffickers. We won’t allow it in America.” Another post from the Foothill Democrats explicitly called on people to protest at a hotel that was housing ICE, using the tagline “No Sleep for ICE.” It said the protest would continue “until the hotel makes them leave.” Screen Shot One protest organized by the Democratic group at a hotel in Arcadia appeared to have the intended effect. After first advertising the protest to its followers, the Foothill Community Democrats’ Instagram page made another post, this one reading “ICE is out of Arcadia Hilton!” “We started this protest at 11am and community members kept showing up all day until it reached upwards of 50 dedicated people tonight,” the post read. Screen Shot Foothill Community Democrats is officially affiliated with the Democratic Party. In order to become a member, one must pay dues through ActBlue, the fundraising arm of the Democratic Party. “Membership dues fund our efforts to elect Democrats at the local, state, and federal levels and, most importantly, to the White House,” the organization states. The Foothill Community Democrats did not respond to a request for comment. The group has held events in conjunction with high-profile Democrats, including California Governor Gavin Newsom. Screen Shot The Democrats’ efforts to doxx ICE agents is one of the latest ways that leftwing agitators have attempted to hinder the operations of federal law enforcement. The Daily Wire recently revealed that activists teamed up to raise funds for helmets, respirators, and gloves before distributing them to agitators on the “front lines” of the unrest against law enforcement in Los Angeles. EXCLUSIVE: I uncovered a leftist activist network that’s passing out riot gear to the anti-ICE agitators in Los Angeles, furnishing them with the supplies they need to face off against police. The last person caught doing this was arrested by the @FBI. Here’s what I found. ? pic.twitter.com/XU9E1gGxqL — Spencer Lindquist ?? (@SpencerLndqst) June 13, 2025 The activist behind the distribution of the supplies told one Instagram user that half-respirator masks — just like those that she purchased for the agitators — could be used to neutralize tear gas used by the police. She even shared one Instagram post with a guide on  “how to make it harder for cops to do their jobs.” The post recommended that activists pick up tear gas canisters and “return to owner,” or throw it back at the police. The California Democratic Party and Democrat National Committee did not respond to requests for comment.

For years, physicists have theorized that some black holes might actually be wormholes, and new research shows that this is indeed possible. While wormholes, which are tunnels in the fabric of space-time that allow travel to another part of the universe, are mathematically possible, there is no evidence that they exist. The authors of a study published on the preprint server arXiv offer more evidence to support the theory that wormholes can masquerade as black holes, since the two objects have similar characteristics. Wormholes, tunnels in space-time that allow one to travel to another world, or more precisely, to another part of space relatively quickly, are still hypothetical objects. According to many theories, wormholes, also called wormholes, connect two points in the fabric of space-time that can be located at a huge distance from each other. Some physicists believe that these objects can be used to quickly travel not only between star systems, but also between galaxies. One of the first theoretical wormholes is the Einstein-Rosen bridge, but this is simply a certain solution to the Einstein field equations, which maps the geometry of space-time under certain conditions of matter and energy. Credit: Public Domain All theories about wormholes are based on the existence of negative energy, a phenomenon that does not exist in classical physics, but it is not yet clear whether it exists in quantum physics. Because of the strangeness of spacetime required for a stable wormhole to form, some physicists have considered the possibility that some black holes might actually be wormholes in disguise. Although physics makes it nearly impossible for stable wormholes to exist, mathematics shows that it is possible. The authors of the new study analyzed a certain attribute of Schwarzschild black holes (hypothetical black holes that do not rotate and have no electric field) known as quasi-normal modes (QNMs). These modes are considered quasi-normal because they describe the characteristic oscillations of space-time when the compact object is disturbed, meaning they do not continue indefinitely. Using different approaches to analyze different types of perturbations, physicists have concluded that a wormhole can consistently reproduce the QNMs associated with static black holes. Scientists say wormholes are exotic compact objects that go beyond the predictions of Einstein’s general theory of relativity and could theoretically exist, though they have not yet been detected. This is likely because they closely mimic the observed properties of black holes. Physicists suggest that supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies may be wormholes. The light emitted by the black hole’s accretion disk (where matter falls into the black hole) may be the light surrounding the wormhole’s entrance, which precisely mimics the properties of the accretion disk’s light. The physicists intend to continue their research to find more evidence that some black holes may be wormholes. The post Galactic Gateways? The Growing Case for Wormholes Disguised as Black Holes appeared first on Anomalien.com.

Florida’s Board of Governors on June 3 rejected Santa Ono for president of its flagship school, the University of Florida. This came just one week after the University of Florida’s Board of Trustees unanimously approved Ono. In what is typically a procedural process, it marked the first time in the 22 years since the Board of Governors was established that it had rejected a candidate in this fashion. It was a blow for not only Ono but also for the board itself.How did Ono nearly get approved as the University of Florida’s next president? The short answer is the almost childish simplicity of the Board of Trustees — and especially its chairman, Mori Hosseini. They created a situation where only an establishment education administrator like Ono could be selected.Ono turned out to be a fanatical opportunist who serially abdicates responsibility — a man without honor or integrity.On October 29, 2024, Hosseini announced the formation of the University of Florida’s presidential search committee. In January 2025, the committee selected SP&A, “a boutique woman- and minority-owned executive search firm,” to lead the search. (SP&A is currently conducting the presidential search at the University of South Florida as well.) Soon thereafter, the search firm created a presidential prospectus that made clear it sought a candidate with “professional and administrative” experience at a “research university or comparable setting,” though others with doctorates or those who had “national or international scholarly and administrative success outside academia” could be considered.This job description stacked the deck against hiring anyone from the realm of politics or administration, which had been the pool from which Florida selected university presidents in recent memory. Manny Diaz, Florida’s director of the Department of Education, who oversaw Florida’s rise to become the No. 1 state for education, was thus ineligible to serve as the University of Florida’s next president. No one contacted Diaz about the job. Members of Florida’s Board of Governors and Chancellor Ray Rodrigues, head of the State University System of Florida, were ineligible, too. Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo? Also out of the running.We can only speculate about how the deck was stacked. SP&A colluded with campus stakeholders, especially faculty, when the firm was retained. Together, they developed the criteria necessary to hire a Santa Ono. The faculty and search firm won when the search committee approved the job description for the next University of Florida president, either through negligence or prestige envy.Conservative backlashThe University of Florida’s Board of Trustees named Ono the sole finalist on May 4, and they set May 27 as the date to vote on his candidacy. A flurry of activity followed. Gubernatorial candidate and U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) came out against Ono on May 6. Libs of TikTok and DC_Draino posted viral videos of Ono talking about systemic racism in his previous jobs. A group called @CommiesOnCampus posted what it termed “Eight Hours of Ono” videos on May 16. Floodgates were opened when op-eds from Peter Wood, Maya Sulkin, Karol Marcowicz, and Joy Pullmann appeared. Christopher Rufo hit the issue hard as the board’s vote neared. More videos were unearthed on transgender issues. All hands were on deck. — (@) The University of Florida’s Board of Trustees could not ignore what was unearthed. Instead, the board scripted a portrayal of Ono as a recent convert to the Florida way. They conducted a carefully orchestrated “interview” on May 27, where members threw questions at Ono like a circus performer would throw peanuts at an elephant about to perform.The board’s members embarrassingly nodded as they asked prepared questions about Ono’s volte-face and extracted implausible pledges of future good behavior. His evolution was a marketing scheme for the willingly duped. When asked if he thought universities were inherently racist, Ono admitted that his thinking “evolved over time:” “I think it’s actually counterproductive to call any group of people or institutions with some sort of blanket definition or label.” When asked if he still believes in implicit bias, Ono confessed he “would not make those kinds of statements or label different groups of people in that way.” Before, he wanted to cultivate activists; now, he wanted institutional neutrality. Such meager pledges were good enough for the board, and they voted unanimously to approve him as the University of Florida’s 14th president.By this point, only Mori Hosseini and his board seemed to favor of Ono. Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Rep. Jimmy Patronis (R-Fla.), Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.), and Rep. Greg Stuebe (R-Fla.), along with Charlie Kirk and Donald Trump Jr., all criticized the pick. — (@) The meeting that roasted OnoNot since Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) grilled Ivy League presidents has there been a more effective questioning of leftist academic leaders than at the Florida Board of Governors. Florida’s former speaker of the House, Paul Renner, developed a casebook against Santa Ono and shared it on X before the hearing. Others had their own approaches. All were serious, sustained, and impressive. — (@) A leftist sat in a chair and could not evade tough questions. Unlike the University of Florida’s Board of Trustees, the Florida Board of Governors used the time to question Ono — not simply about his flip-flopping, but also about how he understands wokeness. Rarely has a suit been this empty.The Board of Governors consistently showed how Ono’s conversion of convenience raised deep questions about his judgment and leadership.Board member Carson Good asked Ono a series of simple, devastating questions. Ono had established an anti-racism task force when president at the University of Michigan. “What do they mean when they say anti-racism?” Good asked. Ono’s answer: “I’m an immunologist, so that’s not my specific area.” Good asked about decolonization, whiteness, the original sin of racism, and inclusive history.With each question, Ono retreated with apologies, disclaiming any expertise — or even knowledge — of what he was advocating. His entire career stood for promoting radical diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, but now — apparently — he did not know what they meant! His excuse was that he had simply parroted the words of campus leftists.Good even asked about Ono requiring that students at the University of Michigan get COVID-19 booster shots as late as 2023. Again, Ono retreated behind leftist campus committees. His chief health officer and a committee made the decision. “I’m a scientist,” Ono said, but they are “actually doctors” who made the recommendation.Good had laid the trap. “You’re an immunologist, and wouldn’t an immunologist know better than an M.D.?” Ono’s answer: “I’m basically a mouse doctor.” Good’s point was powerfully put. What kind of an academic leader governs according to an ideology he does not understand — or farms out policy questions to committees while forswearing responsibility?Opponents of DEI have long suspected that the embrace of DEI among university leaders is more opportunistic than fanatical. Ono turned out to be a fanatical opportunist who serially abdicates responsibility — a man without honor or integrity. The board of governors voted 6-10 to reject his candidacy.Shame and worse should fall on those who supported him after this deeply humiliating questioning. Shame and disqualification for other offices should fall on the University of Florida’s Board of Trustees for failing to ask questions about Ono’s leadership failures and poor judgment.Toward a sustainable offenseAll honor goes to Florida’s Board of Governors, who acted to stop a dishonorable man from becoming president of Florida’s flagship university — and the highest-paid public university president in the nation. The University of Florida can still undertake necessary reforms. Its future president can still select deans and other academic leaders who are instinctively aligned with higher education reform, remove corrupt programs, and reimagine schools and colleges for serious purposes.Defeating Ono at the board of governors level was a successful Hail Mary — but that is not an argument for designing higher education reform around such drastic measures. Florida needs a sustainable offense.RELATED: DEI is on its last legs, but the right risks keeping it alive Photo by JEFF KOWALSKY / AFP) (Photo by JEFF KOWALSKY/AFP via Getty ImagesThe University of Florida’s Board of Trustees has proven unequal to the task. Perhaps its leaders think they could drive reform through a lukewarm president from the board level. Perhaps its leaders are embarrassed by conservative efforts at higher education reform. Perhaps they cannot imagine what serious reform would even mean. Whatever the reason, some changes in personnel are necessary at the board.Did the Board of Trustees Vice Chair Patel, who chaired the search committee, know about Ono’s radical record? Did he inform his fellow trustees about it before selecting Ono as the sole finalist? If the answer to either of these questions is no, then Patel should be removed from the board for cause, either for incompetence, misfeasance, or failure to disclose essential information.Many more OnosWe welcome converts to the anti-DEI crusade, but those converts must have demonstrated skin in the game. They must have burned the boats or made enemies for their new stance. Converts must go to accreditation meetings and disavow DEI principles in front of those who hold them. Ono only disavowed DEI in front of supposed critics, with a handsome salary as a reward. “Never mind” — that’s not close to being good enough to show a change of mind.Yet the biggest error lay in the search firm and its collusion with faculty about the job description. The Board of Trustees was either childishly naïve or in on it when it approved a job description requiring the hiring of a conventional academic leader. Conservative academic leaders will often lack experience, since they are critics of our corrupt and corrupting modern higher education system. We should seek aligned, ambitious, and competent people, not “experienced” leaders. Be not impressed with presidents from prestigious universities.Preventing the bad is not the same as getting the good. Nowhere is the deep state more of a reality than at modern universities. Board of trustees members simply cannot be hometown boosters if they want reform and a good president. They must be suspicious and determined from start to finish. Florida’s Board of Governors displayed these virtues and acted accordingly.Ono is out. But there are plenty of Ono clones looking for the job — and next time they will disguise themselves better.Editor’s note: This article was published originally at the American Mind.

We hear about family-friendly LGBTQ+ pride events all the time. It’s a sad reality of the times we’re living in. But a family-friendly drag event hosted by a church? Now that is something you don’t hear about every day.On this episode of “Come and Take It,” Sara Gonzales exposes a Pride festival at a Texas church that will have your jaw on the floor. The event, which was put on by Carrollton Pride, was hosted at the Horizon Unitarian Universalist Church in Carrollton, Texas, a suburb of Dallas.“Just something about all of this stuff being on church grounds, I never get used to it,” says Sara, who attended the event and captured footage of some of the activities, including a drag-themed bingo game where children sat looking deeply uncomfortable.The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence — a nonprofit group of queer and trans activists who dress as nuns in drag to promote LGBTQ+ rights — was one group that was present at the event. “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence have had, I don't know, just a few run-ins with the law when it comes to gross things with kids,” Sara reminds, referencing past cases.However, when Sara explored the actual church, its hosting of the Pride event suddenly made perfect sense. Not only were there “trans-inclusive bathrooms,” “pronoun workshops,” “LGBTQIA+ themed worship services,” and messages about “reproductive justice,” but there were also several informational pamphlets for congregants, such as “Care and Treatment for HIV, Hepatitis-C, and Other Sexually Transmitted Diseases,” “Intersex 101,” “Environmental Justice,” “Let’s Celebrate Non-Binary Parents!” and “A Unitarian Universalist People of Color Ministry.”The most shocking pamphlet, however, instructed congregants on how to protect illegal immigrants — who were, of course, misleadingly called just “immigrants” — from law enforcement. Titled “How U.S. Citizens Can Protect the Immigrant Community from the Deportation Force,” the document contains a bulleted list explaining how to help illegal immigrants evade “Trump’s deportation force.”One of the bullet points on the list actually advises congregants to “identify folks who would be interested in risking arrest to support stopping the raid.”“What I'm reading is that they are saying you should find people willing to break the law and to obstruct a law enforcement official from doing their job,” says Sara.“This is not a church of God,” she condemns. This is a church of some “fake religion” rooted in “liberalism and leftist ideology.”To hear Sara’s complete exposé on the Horizon Unitarian Universalist Church, watch the video above.Want more from Sara Gonzales?To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.