YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #police #astronomy #florida #law #racism
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Go LIVE! Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Fun Facts And Interesting Bits
Fun Facts And Interesting Bits
4 w ·Youtube General Interest

YouTube
16 Riddles That Will Train You to See Hidden Details
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Satire
Conservative Satire
4 w

June 18, 2025 — Today's Conservative Cartoon
Favicon 
twincitiesbusinessradio.com

June 18, 2025 — Today's Conservative Cartoon

June 18, 2025 — Today's Conservative Cartoon
Like
Comment
Share
BlabberBuzz Feed
BlabberBuzz Feed
4 w

Ilhan Omar Pushes Fiction Over Facts
Favicon 
www.blabber.buzz

Ilhan Omar Pushes Fiction Over Facts

Like
Comment
Share
Living In Faith
Living In Faith
4 w

God’s Good Design for Marriage: 5 Doctrinal Dimensions
Favicon 
www.thegospelcoalition.org

God’s Good Design for Marriage: 5 Doctrinal Dimensions

June is the month of many weddings. But is marriage really a good idea? It seems our contemporary culture—where marriage is increasingly delayed, if pursued at all—isn’t sold on the idea. And yet marriage is a God-designed, good gift. It’s good for us as individuals and good for the world. It’s a means of common grace and a means of special grace. The world needs more defenders of and advocates for marriage, and Christians are well positioned to play that role. To that end, I’d like to offer a doxological tribute to marriage, a celebration and commendation of God’s good and glorious design. To commend marriage isn’t to disparage singleness. Nor is it to overlook the overwhelming pain and damage of which marriage may be the vehicle. Yet even with these caveats, the following five biblical angles on marriage blend into a concert of praise to the God who creates men and women for the inherent goodness of marital union, the expansion of humankind, and the glory of his name. 1. Protology/Teleology (Purpose/Goal) God has a purpose in creation. This is the meaning of “protology.” He created humans and established marriage to show forth his glory (Rom. 11:36). The things God made—including people, their relationships, and their offspring—reveal God’s reality and majesty (1:20). Specifically, we see protology in the famous creation mandate of Genesis 1:26–28, which may be the most ignored and disobeyed foundational text of Scripture in the Western church today. This Genesis creation mandate reminds us of the imago Dei, the image of God, the imprint of himself that each human bears. We bear the image respectively as a woman or a man but also corporately in the one-flesh union of marriage. We each possess both personal and social identity. At the core of the social identity of a sustainable humanity is male and female in monogamous, mutual commitment, multiplying and filling the earth, subduing it and having dominion. This is basic but profound biblical protology. The world needs more defenders of and advocates for marriage, and Christians are well positioned to play that role. What about teleology, the goal of marriage? We gather clues from the Edenic model of marriage in Genesis 2, which Jesus later affirms as normative (Matt. 19:3). We learn that God deemed Adam alone to be “not good” (Gen. 2:18), meaning not as good as it would be when he made humankind complete by creating Eve. With Eve’s creation, fruitfulness and multiplication can ensue. We see at the end of Genesis 2 the basis and framework for a husband and wife to discover and revel in the love and trust that exist in God and that God extends to humans as they’re in relationship with him. A great telos or goal of marriage is for the love that’s within God and available from God not just to be realized in two people but shared by two people, who are sustained and transformed over time by the divine presence and their response to each other and God, empowered to love and serve because of that presence. To summarize the teleology of marriage: God’s goal from Adam and Eve onward was to unite a man and a woman who are in live and holy relationship with him in a conjugal relation with each other, from which procreation might result and within which God-quality love and trust would flourish. Marriage from the start was about mission. The husband and wife are created and sent forth with a shared purpose. They’re the nucleus of a family unit charged with living not for themselves but for the sake of the Creator and King who calls us all into being, with a purpose. In marriage, that purpose is profoundly a joint enterprise—so joint that the lot of one is the lot of both, as we’re about to see. 2. Hamartiology (Doctrine of Sin) God’s very good creation was rocked when our first parents transgressed. Before they sinned, they were right with God and with each other. Their pre-fall Edenic marriage was like a team. They were united, though the team members weren’t identical or interchangeable. They were one, though clearly individual and distinct in their interface with each other, their world, and God. I call this a relational synergy. They functioned in glorious, perfect harmony as designed. But in Genesis 3, Eve sins. Adam follows suit. Whom does God confront? Eventually both team members, but first and more fully Adam (v. 9): “But the LORD God called to the man and said to him, ‘Where are you?’” Adam, now a sinner, violates trust and love, throws his teammate under the bus, and even blames God: “The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me fruit of the tree, and I ate” (v. 12, emphasis added). Eve just blames the Serpent: “Then the LORD God said to the woman, ‘What is this that you have done?’ The woman said, ‘The serpent deceived me, and I ate’” (v. 13). Yet despite their transgression, God promises in verse 15 that the woman’s offspring would bruise the Serpent’s head (an elegant understatement), foreshadowing the Messiah’s defeat of sin and evil. Note how God uplifts team member Eve. She—who was the first to sin and who in fulfilling the creation mandate of procreation will suffer in childbirth— will also be the means of grace in the coming Messiah. The seed of the woman, the Christ, will one day be conceived in a daughter of Eve named Mary. We praise God for marriage preservation despite our first parents’ violation. We praise him because wrapped within well-deserved punishment was also eternal promise. Marriage and procreation—though now marred by the fall—became a means of God’s redemptive plan. 3. Soteriology (Doctrine of Salvation) What do we need saving from? Answer: sin, of course. One aspect of that sin is the hostility in our hearts against each other and against God—even against ourselves. Scripture calls this animosity many things, but one of them is “enmity.” In Genesis 3:15, the same verse that promises the Christ through the bruising of the Serpent’s head, God introduces “enmity” (LXX ἔχθρα) into the world. Formerly, Adam and Eve knew harmony. Then they sinned. The “very good” shalom (peace) of creation is fractured. Adam and Eve—and all people since—will feel the sting of estrangement from God, and each other. There will be disagreement and rancor and division between us. With this enmity, the potential for marital conflict begins. It spreads to their progeny. Adam and Eve’s firstborn son, Cain, will kill their son Abel (4:8). The Old Testament is the story not only of God’s work of redemption but of the proliferation of enmity: from the sibling rivalry of children, to tensions in marriage, to male exploitation of women, to the geopolitical rivalries of nations and thrones. Where will it end? How will God redeem the world? The theme of ἔχθρα (hostility, estrangement, alienation, malice) introduced in Genesis finds its resolution in Ephesians, where Paul uses that same word potently. Speaking of Christ, Paul states, “For he himself is our peace, who has made us both one and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall of hostility [ἔχθρα] . . . [and reconciled] us both [i.e., Jew and Gentile] to God in one body through the cross, thereby killing the hostility [ἔχθρα]” (Eph. 2:14, 16). The enmity Eden ushered in, God in Christ decisively and eternally defeated. Correlating with the macrocosmic social effects of the salvation Christ offers, at the microcosmic level men and women can overcome the implications of enmity that began to be their nemesis in Genesis 3. This is true in marriage for those in Christ. It’s true for congregational life under the headship of Christ as he delegates his leadership through the apostles by his Holy Spirit to pastoral leaders, other caregivers, and the witness of every congregational member. This brings us to ecclesiology. 4. Ecclesiology (Doctrine of the Church) The discourse flow of Ephesians signals that the doctrine of the church is intertwined with the doctrine of marriage. Part of the reason is that the early churches met in homes—house churches. In Judaism, you could start a synagogue and support a rabbi with 10 families. Something similar must have happened as early church plants became congregations. They had male leaders, called elders or shepherds or overseers. They were mostly married. The harmony of marriages, or lack thereof, is difficult to hide when you meet in homes. Conversely, Christ-centered, self-giving marriages would have formed an attractive role model to nonbelievers seeking a richer married life than pagan marriages tended to offer. What were healthy, Christ-centered marriages like in those congregations? They weren’t marked by brash male authority or by some version of today’s gender equality. The gospel rightly accepted was meant to produce ordered relational synergy in fulfillment of God’s creation mandate and eventually Christ’s Great Commission. Genesis 1–2 exhibits a microcosmic ecclesial social order in which husband and wife were equal, though asymmetrical in their origin, biology, responsibilities, competencies, and fundamental outlook. Adam and Eve’s unity, dinged in the fall but not destroyed, lay in the mystery of their diversity as much as in their human oneness. The celebration of that diversity is at the core of marital love and helps explain Adam’s delight when he first glimpsed Eve (2:23). Sin soured that delight for them both. But from Genesis to Revelation, God invites us into a redemptive story that will reintroduce his Edenic shalom into human relationships to the extent possible in this age. In the early church—as Paul’s Ephesians 5 instruction on marriage highlights with its call for the woman’s trust in her husband and her husband’s Christlike love for her—this shalom comes neither by gender equalization nor gender stratification. It comes through the regeneration of hearts to enter into a synergy that sanctifies lives, marriages, families, and congregations. Healthy Christian marriages are to permeate this world of enmity with cruciform pursuit of God’s will. Healthy Christian marriages are to permeate this world of enmity with cruciform pursuit of God’s will. Our mission in marriage and church is neither to perpetuate male hierarchy nor to erase male-female distinctions but to see the covenantal bond that was established in Genesis 1–2 transformed into its original purpose. It’s to appropriate the grace grounded in the cross that, post-fall, enables God’s ordered relational synergy. Here, women and men can mediate the peace of Christ to a world racked with enmity. We can mediate this peace because at the most basic, daily level—first in marriages and in households, and thereby in congregations—we’re living it out. We live out that deliverance from enmity, that shalom, that care for others, that diligence unto God in our work and daily lives, that spreading of the gospel message, in keeping with the sexual identity God established for us at conception. We live it out singly and in marriage units and in congregations, disciples together who devote our personal and shared lives to the call to embody and spread the gospel call throughout the world, flourishing in “fellowship . . . with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ” together “so that our joy may be complete” (1 John 1:3–4). Thereby are the creation mandate (Gen. 1:26–28) and the Great Commission (Matt. 28:19–20) fulfilled in advance of Christ’s return to make all things new. This brings us to eschatology. 5. Eschatology (Doctrine of Last Things) In a dispute with some Sadducees, Jesus warned about overinterpreting the connection between marriage and the age to come. He said, “In the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven” (Matt. 22:30). Yet marriage and last things aren’t unconnected, as we read in Hebrews 13:4: “Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous.” The scent of the age to come permeates a godly, growing Christian marriage. In marriage, we discover a mighty means of grace, a wellspring of divine enablement and outpouring, that enables us to fulfill our calling and mission. We see the perfection of life in the age to come foreshadowed in the grit and grime of daily life as we work out our salvation with fear and trembling (Phil. 2:12), not all by our lonesome but alongside our spouse. The age to come will reveal the true meaning of our lives in this age. I believe that for believers in Christ who are married, the most important fruit we bear will be most directly related to the quality of our married lives. In the case of married church leaders, for example, God’s blessing on their publicly visible service—preaching, teaching, blogging, publishing, or whatever—grows out of the integrity of private lives only their spouses really know. The scent of the age to come permeates a godly, growing Christian marriage. In 2010, I left a wonderful seminary position because my wife and I agreed we should move next door to my mother and stepfather, who were in their 80s, had health issues, and needed care. They lived hundreds of miles away, but I could continue my call to teach New Testament at the seminary where I currently serve. First Timothy 5:8 says, “If anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.” I was writing a commentary on 1 Timothy. That verse nailed me. My wife, Bernie, left a cherished and fulfilling nursing position; I left a calling and location and people I loved. We sold our house in a down market and moved, not exactly full of cheer. There followed 13 years of elder care, shouldered mainly by my wife. Her retirement from nursing was an income hit. She drove my parents to countless medical appointments. She cooked meals. She oversaw home health visits from other caregivers. After some years, she oversaw my mother’s care in a nursing home. She did hundreds of loads of laundry. She reached out to my mother’s several roommates over the years. She bore the angst and sometimes ire of her mother-in-law, the lot of many primary caregivers of the elderly. For my part, I became the trustee and caretaker of a house and 10 acres. The burden over time, physical and emotional and psychological, was enormous. In January 2024, my mother died. Fittingly, Bernie was at her bedside. If my dying mother could hear voices in her final hour, she heard her daughter-in-law reading Scripture and singing that great Reformation hymn “I Greet Thee, Who My Sure Redeemer Art” in her ear. My mother would have been borne up in her final moments by the third verse: Thou art the Life, by which alone we live, and all our substance and our strength receive O comfort us in death’s approaching hour, strong-hearted then to face it by Thy pow’r. There’s a reason Proverbs extols wives: “An excellent wife is the crown of her husband” (12:4). “He who finds a wife finds a good thing and obtains favor from the LORD” (18:22). “An excellent wife who can find? She is far more precious than jewels” (31:10). Husbands who fear, love, and serve God have their good points, too, though they’re portrayed with less sublimity in Proverbs. The point is that in ministry and in the Christian life at every level, if God has granted us the grace of marriage, we sink or swim by the often unseen, private ways we relate to and regard our spouse. In their low moments, marriages simply reflect the enmity of a fallen world. But at their best, marriages are pictures and foretastes of the Edenic relational synergy that was lost but will one day be restored and perfected as God eternally dwells with his people in harmony. I don’t know what form our earthly relational synergy with a spouse will take in the age to come. Jesus said that in the resurrection, husbands and wives now will then be like angels in heaven. So it’ll be different, as I’m far from an angel here. I do know that our life then and there will resound forever to the glory and praise of “the Lord God the Almighty and the Lamb” (Rev. 21:22). And if, as I among the heavenly host, I feel my wife, now transformed, take my hand, I won’t be surprised.
Like
Comment
Share
Living In Faith
Living In Faith
4 w

Serving like Jesus at Work
Favicon 
www.thegospelcoalition.org

Serving like Jesus at Work

In my work, God has led me down a winding road—from accounting to leadership positions at McDonald’s, then Jiffy Lube, then Shell, then BP, and now at a fintech startup. But in every twist and turn, at work and church, he’s graciously provided me opportunities to serve and lead. Servant leadership is one of the most influential and highly debated leadership theories of the last 40 years. Even to Bible-believers, who know God’s Word is perfect (2 Sam. 22:31), profitable (2 Tim. 3:16–17), and pure (Ps. 12:6), biblical truths may sometimes seem to run counter to common sense. Since God’s ways are higher than man’s ways (Isa. 55:8–9), the believing leader must reconcile his or her thoughts—his or her reality—with God’s mind and will as revealed in the Bible, not the other way around (Phil. 2:2–4; Rom. 12:2; Eph. 4:20–24). While the Bible’s apparent paradoxes may present temporary conundrums, they aren’t contradictions. Like God, we can both lead and serve. We can put others ahead of ourselves. Let me share six surprising scriptural secrets of service, surrender, and sacrifice. 1. To achieve greatness, serve everyone. In his teaching on human ambition, the Lord taught his disciples that those who wish to become the greatest among them must serve all (Matt. 20:16; Mark 10:35–45). He used himself as the supreme example of the high cost of selfless sacrifice, saying, “The Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many” (Matt. 20:28). The son of the Sovereign, himself sovereign God, said he came to serve. His life-ransoming service cost him everything but ultimately gained him (and us) even more. The son of the Sovereign, himself sovereign God, said he came to serve. When serve-first CEOs work early mornings and late nights, when church planters set up chairs and take out the trash (like my father did), or when plant managers take extra summer shifts so their line workers can take time off, we see the others-first, self-denying marks of true servant leadership. 2. To get more happiness, give more. The apostle Paul quotes Christ when he says, “It is more blessed to give than receive” (Acts 20:35). While this principle may appear emotionally relevant at birthdays and Christmastime, in context, it seems to apply more to giving sacrificially to “support the weak” (v. 35). In 1 Corinthians 4, Paul refers to the fact that he and his missionary companions had been hungry, thirsty, mistreated, and homeless (v. 11) and needed God’s people to care for them. The paradox seems to be that it’s more blessed (more conducive to true happiness) to give to the most needy—those least likely or able to give anything back—than it is to receive a gift like being well fed, well clothed, and well treated. Leaders should remember that giving time and energy to those followers who need it most, and who may seem to have the least to offer in return, is part of servant-leader altruism. For example, retired leaders may spend time mentoring interns, CEOs may invest in employees who will eventually work elsewhere, or managers may take a chance on hiring someone they aren’t sure will be reliable. In each case, these leaders are giving to those who can never pay them personally—and in some cases will not even benefit the company. 3. To go up, the way may be down. The messianic journey of the eternally preexistent Son (John 1:1) was an epic journey down—from the highest heights of glory to the depths of the grave (Eph. 4:9). But because Jesus was obedient to and through death, God highly exalted him, bestowing on him the highest title and position: Lord of all (Phil. 2:9–11). I worked at McDonald’s for 14 years early in my career. After six years in a regional controller role, I entered an executive training program in restaurant operations. Even though I was a CPA and MBA, I began as a crew trainee in the restaurants. I cleaned toilets, worked every weekend, counted cash drawers, and scrubbed trash cans. After two years in the restaurants full-time, I was operationally qualified to lead markets and regions for the company. When I became the regional vice president in Nashville and then Kansas City, I was able to make better decisions based on my recent real-life serving experiences with both customers and crew. Those two years in the restaurants were some of the most difficult but also, by far, the most formative and rewarding of my career. 4. Ending is better than beginning. The wise preacher in Ecclesiastes taught that the day of one’s death may be happier than the day of one’s birth, and a funeral is better than a party (Eccl. 7:1–4). When a life has been well lived and the journey is complete, the ending may be more joyful than the uncertain beginning. One example: I enjoy traveling. I like the anticipation of the journey and the high and low points. But nothing makes me happier than packing on the last day of a trip and preparing to return home. In the biblical sense, the journey’s last day is happier than the first, because our Odyssean journey has been completed, and we know we’re going home. In the same way, the day we retire should be sweeter than our first day on the job. We can look back at the ways God has provided, praise him for both his severe mercies and abundant generosity, and rejoice in the satisfaction of a job well done. 5. To achieve victory and freedom, yield. On the penultimate day of his earthly life, Jesus yielded. In the darkest hour before the cross, when all he could do was physically and emotionally labor in prayer, Jesus surrendered his will, once again, to the Father’s divine will (John 6:38). Through his obedience and yielding, the world’s greatest victory was achieved and every believer was made victorious in him. Similarly, every believer must yield daily to the Father’s will (Rom. 12:1). The servant leader, instead of insisting on the rights and privileges attending the office, may unexpectedly choose to yield the prerogatives of leadership for the real power found only in sacrificial service and selfless surrender. At work, this could mean silently accepting the boss’s unfair decision, waiting patiently for a long-overdue promotion, or giving in to a coworker when a conflict starts to escalate. 6. To leverage sacrificial service, learn. Even though Jesus was God’s Son, he learned obedience from the things he suffered (Heb. 5:8). The all-knowing, eternal Son of God, present and active from the creation of the cosmos (John 1:1–5), learned. He learned obedience experientially. Not only is Christ an exemplary servant leader, but he’s also the ultimate example of a servant learner. If the all-knowing God leverages his human trials to learn, any executive may seek new insights from even the most challenging life experiences. Start-up life is hard. After I’d spent more than 30 years in corporate roles and experienced six interstate relocations, my wife and I moved back to our hometown, and I joined a small tech start-up as CEO. We had six employees and two weeks of payroll in the bank. I learned to leverage relationships to raise the capital we needed to grow. We nearly ran out of money twice in that first year. I learned faith and dependence on God through those lean times. After six years, we’re now fully funded and sustainable thanks to more than 100 courageous investors who believed in us. While this was later in my leadership journey, I learned much from the process. My Thoughts, His Thoughts The servant leader may seek to reconcile his or her thinking with the mind of God as revealed in the Bible (Eph. 4:20–24), which will result in the practical development of a Christian worldview. When viewed from God’s perspective, the Bible’s apparent paradoxes reveal surprising scriptural insights about the heart of leadership—service, sacrifice, and surrender. I learned faith and dependence on God through those lean times. Consider Christ’s range of service—how far he came and how much he gave to serve obediently and perfectly. These choices and actions demonstrate the extent of Jesus’s serve-first, others-first servant leadership. God the Father, too, lacks nothing and is all-sufficient and eternally complete in himself (Acts 17:24–25). Yet his every interaction with us is others-focused. And the Holy Spirit serves by guiding and teaching (John 16:13) each believer as we develop progressively from one glory to greater glory (2 Cor. 3:18) in the process of ongoing sanctification (2 Thess. 2:13; 1 Pet. 1:2). God’s divine motivations and actions are consistent with servant leadership. The leader who holds a Christian worldview may benefit from prayerful meditation on God as the original and ultimate servant leader.
Like
Comment
Share
Living In Faith
Living In Faith
4 w

The Power of the Cross (1 Cor. 1:18–25)
Favicon 
www.thegospelcoalition.org

The Power of the Cross (1 Cor. 1:18–25)

In this lecture, Don Carson highlights the original scandal of the cross in the ancient world and its power to divide humanity between those perishing and those being saved. Paul’s message emphasizes that true ministry must center on Christ crucified, not human eloquence or cultural status. Carson warns against modern evangelical distractions and urges a return to the gospel’s transforming power. He teaches the following: The shocking implications of the cross and crucifixion in the first century, and how they’re different today Why people often want to set their own criteria for what God should be like God has already passed judgment on the best that the world has to offer through the cross The cross’s message is that God’s wisdom and power are displayed in the moment of greatest human weakness Why being wise, powerful, or well-born cannot be a criterion for being a Christian A warning against the idolatries of evangelicalism, such as the love of methods and self-promotion How focusing too much on social and political ramifications can lead to a quiet denial of the gospel The cross’s message is the only polarity in the human race that’s of of eternal consequence
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
4 w

Explosive devices found at home of man arrested near No Kings protest allegedly carrying a gun and ammunition
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Explosive devices found at home of man arrested near No Kings protest allegedly carrying a gun and ammunition

Police said they found a pipe bomb and other improvised explosive devices at the home of a man who was arrested near a No Kings protest in West Chester, Pennsylvania.Law enforcement searched the home of 31-year-old Kevin Krebs on Conestoga Road in East Whiteland Township on Monday evening and disabled all of the explosives, according to a spokesperson for the West Chester Police Department.'I always tell him, you are safe always. You're always being protected. You're never in any harm's way.'Officials had initially said that seven explosives had been found at the home but later said the total number came to 13 explosive devices.Krebs had a fully loaded Sig Sauer P320 handgun under a long yellow raincoat when he was spotted at the protest Saturday, according to police. He also was found with ammunition, an M9 bayonet, a pocketknife, pepper spray, a ski mask, and gloves.Police said they found an AR-15 style rifle on the floor of his SUV.RELATED: Video captures the moment SUV driver barrels through No Kings protesters after getting surrounded in California Photo by: Visions of America/Joseph Sohm/Universal Images Group via Getty Images Investigators said they also found sketches of explosive devices in the home, as well as tactical vests and other items.Krebs was initially released on a $250,000 bond, but he was rearrested and denied bail. He is being held at the Chester County Prison and faces a slew of charges, including 13 counts of weapons of mass destruction. Krebs' younger brother told WPVI-TV that the suspect carried the weapons for his protection."In his brain, he's scared," said Alex Krebs. "I always tell him, you are safe always. You're always being protected. You're never in any harm's way."In a separate incident from the protest in Riverside, California, an SUV driver barreled into protesters after they surrounded the vehicle and one damaged a rear brake lamp. Police are trying to identify the driver, and one woman suffered critical injuries from the incident.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
4 w

This Yale professor thinks patriotism is some kind of hate crime
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

This Yale professor thinks patriotism is some kind of hate crime

Timothy Snyder has built a career trying to convince Americans that Donald Trump is a latter-day Adolf Hitler — a fascist demagogue hell-bent on dismantling America’s institutions to seize power. Last week, the Yale historian and author of the bestselling resistance pamphlet “On Tyranny,” briefly changed course. Now, apparently, Trump is Jefferson Davis. In a recent Substack post, Snyder claimed Trump’s speech at Fort Bragg amounted to a call for civil war. He argued that the president’s praise for the military and his rejection of the left’s historical revisionism signaled not patriotism but treason — and the rise of a “paramilitary” regime.Trump doesn’t want a second civil war. He wants the first one to mean something. No, seriously. That’s what he thinks.Renaming Fort BraggTrump’s first alleged Confederate offense, Snyder said, was to reinstate the military base’s original name: Fort Bragg. The Biden administration had renamed it Fort Liberty, repudiating General Braxton Bragg’s Confederate ties. Trump reversed the change. The Biden administration had renamed the base Fort Liberty, citing General Braxton Bragg’s service to the Confederacy. Trump reversed the change. But he didn’t do it to honor a Confederate general. He did it to honor World War II paratrooper Roland L. Bragg, as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth explained.Snyder wasn’t buying it. He accused the administration of fabricating a “dishonest pretense” that glorifies “oathbreakers and traitors.”That charge hits close to home.My grandfather Martin Spohn was a German Jewish refugee who fled Nazi Berlin in 1936. He proudly served in the U.S. Army. He trained with the 101st Airborne Division at Fort Bragg before deploying to Normandy. Like thousands of others, he saw the base not as a Confederate monument but as a launchpad for defeating actual fascism.Restoring the name Fort Bragg doesn’t rewrite history. It honors the Americans who made history — men who trained there to liberate Europe from tyranny.That’s not fascism. That’s victory over it.Deploying the National GuardFor Snyder, though, Trump’s real crime was calling up the National Guard to restore order in riot-torn Los Angeles. That, he claimed, puts Trump in the same category as Robert E. Lee.According to Snyder, the president is “preparing American soldiers to see themselves as heroes when they undertake operations inside the United States against unarmed people, including their fellow citizens.”Let’s set aside the hysteria.Trump didn’t glorify the Confederacy. He called for law and order in the face of spiraling violence. He pushed back against the left’s crusade to erase American history — not to rewrite it but to preserve its complexity.He didn’t tell soldiers to defy the Constitution. He reminded them of their oath: to defend the nation, not serve the ideological demands of woke officials.Snyder’s claims are as reckless as they are false.He smears anyone who supports border enforcement or takes pride in military service as a threat to democracy. Want secure borders? You’re a fascist. Call out the collapse of Democrat-run cities? You’re a Confederate.This isn’t analysis. It’s slander masquerading as scholarship.The real divisionBut this debate isn’t really about Trump. It’s about power.The left has spent years reshaping the military into a political project — prioritizing diversity seminars over combat readiness, purging dissenters, and enforcing ideological loyalty. When Trump pushes back, it’s not authoritarianism. It’s restoration.The left wants a military that fights climate change, checks pronouns, and marches for “equity.” Trump wants a military that defends the nation. That’s the real divide.Over and over, Snyder accuses Trump of “trivializing” the military by invoking its heroism while discussing immigration enforcement. But what trivializes military service more — linking it to national defense or turning soldiers into props for progressive social experiments?RELATED: The real tyranny? Institutional groupthink disguised as truth Photo by Jeffrey Greenberg/Universal Images Group via Getty ImagesAnd Trump isn’t breaking precedent by deploying the National Guard when local leaders fail. Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson used federal troops during desegregation. Johnson federalized the Alabama National Guard to protect civil rights marchers. The Guard responded during the 1967 Detroit riots, the 1992 Los Angeles riots, and the Black Lives Matter and Antifa upheavals of 2020.Trump acted within his authority — and fulfilled his duty — to restore order when Democrat-run cities descended into chaos.A House divided?Snyder’s rhetoric about “protecting democracy” rings hollow. Trump won the 2024 election decisively. Voters across party lines gave him a clear mandate: Secure the border and remove violent criminals. Pew Research found that 97% of Americans support more vigorous enforcement of immigration laws.Yet Snyder, who constantly warns of creeping authoritarianism, closed his post by urging fellow academics to join No Kings protests.Nobody appointed Timothy Snyder king, either.If he respected democratic institutions, he’d spend less time fearmongering — and more time listening to the Americans, including many in uniform, who are tired of being demonized for loving their country. They’re tired of being called bigots for wanting secure borders. They’re tired of watching history weaponized to silence dissent.Snyder invokes Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address to condemn Trump. But it was Lincoln who paraphrased scripture when he said, “A house divided cannot stand.”Americans united behind Trump in 2024. Snyder’s effort to cast half the country as fascists or Confederates embodies the division Lincoln warned against.Here’s the truth: Trump doesn’t want a second civil war. He wants the first one to mean something.He wants a Union preserved in more than name — a Union defined by secure borders, equal justice, and unapologetic national pride.If that scares Timothy Snyder, maybe the problem isn’t Trump.Perhaps, the problem lies in the man staring back at him in the mirror.
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
4 w

New York Bill Limiting Cows Sparks Farmer Revolt
Favicon 
yubnub.news

New York Bill Limiting Cows Sparks Farmer Revolt

[View Article at Source]By John Klar A New York bill that would restrict the size of cattle farms has sparked controversy as urban climate change legislators from the Big Apple seek to limit rural livelihoods…
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
4 w

The Not So Classy Responses to Kristi Noem's Hospitalization by The Daily Mail and The Bulwark
Favicon 
yubnub.news

The Not So Classy Responses to Kristi Noem's Hospitalization by The Daily Mail and The Bulwark

As Twitchy readers know, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem was taken to a DC hospital, following an allergic reaction, out of an abundance of caution.You probably won't be surprised to learn that this news sparked…
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 3449 out of 85469
  • 3445
  • 3446
  • 3447
  • 3448
  • 3449
  • 3450
  • 3451
  • 3452
  • 3453
  • 3454
  • 3455
  • 3456
  • 3457
  • 3458
  • 3459
  • 3460
  • 3461
  • 3462
  • 3463
  • 3464
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund