What is justice? One Merriam-Webster definition cites justice as "conformity to truth, fact, or reason," and if we accept that, then justice has -- finally -- been served in perhaps the original mainstream transgender debacle. The University of Pennsylvania became a lightning rod for controversy in 2022 when its women's...

Paramount Global, the parent company of CBS and 60 Minutes, has agreed to settle with President Donald Trump over a deceptively edited interview with then-presidential candidate Kamala Harris.  Trump filed the civil suit in April, at the time suing for $20 billion. He stated in an April 13 Truth Social post, “I am so honored to be suing 60 Minutes, CBS Fake News, and Paramount, over their fraudulent, beyond recognition, reporting.” A spokesperson for the president stated, “CBS and Paramount Global realized the strength of this historic case and had no choice but to settle,” adding that, “President Trump will always ensure that no one gets away with lying to the American people.” The initial suit alleged that CBS and Paramount aired two substantially different versions of Vice President Kamala Harris’s response to the same question about the Israel-Hamas war — one on Face the Nation, another on 60 Minutes. He sued under consumer protection law in Texas, and asserted that CBS’s editing constituted “false, misleading or deceptive acts in commerce,” misrepresenting the content to viewers. Trump additionally accused CBS of violating the FCC’s rule against news distortion (47 U.S.C. § 309(a)) by altering a significant interview during an election cycle. Trump’s civil complaint states, “To paper over Kamala’s ‘word salad’ weakness, CBS used its national platform on 60 Minutes to cross the line from the exercise of judgment in reporting to deceitful, deceptive manipulation of news.” Trump’s lawyers also stated that “Millions of Americans, including residents of Texas and this District, were confused and misled by the two doctored Interview versions.” The $16 million settlement represents a victory in Trump’s long litigation history with the media. Since 2015, he has sued the Washington Post, CNN, Univision, and the New York Times. The settlement money will not go to Trump directly, but to his presidential library. Paramount noted that the settlement would not contain any apology or admission of wrongdoing. The chief executive of CBS News, Wendy McMahon, opposed settling the suit. READ MORE from Andrew Gondy: Singer’s ‘Death, Death to the IDF’ Chants Result in Revoked Visas Why Senator Lee’s Withdrawal of Protected Lands Sale Is a Win for All Americans The post %POSTLINK% appeared first on %BLOGLINK%.

Dr. Philip Dormitzer, former global head of vaccine research and development at Pfizer, has been subpoenaed by the House Judiciary Committee as it investigates Pfizer’s alleged delay in the release of COVID vaccine information. It is alleged that senior officials at Pfizer withheld positive trials concerning the COVID vaccine for political purposes, only releasing it after Joe Biden had been elected. Dormitzer worked for GSK, a global pharmaceutical company, after his career with Pfizer. The committee discovered that Dormitzer allegedly admitted to Pfizer’s dishonest practices relating to the timing of vaccine testing by way of a Wall Street Journal article published in March. According to the article, Dormitzer alleged that, in order to affect the election results, Pfizer delayed its announcement of positive test results of the COVID vaccine. By slowing down the testing process, positive results were allegedly withheld from the public so that credit would be redirected from President Trump for the vaccine’s success.   GSK alleges that in a meeting to discuss his relocation, Dormitzer requested that he be moved to Canada. Dormitzer, according to GSK officials, appeared fearful that the Trump administration would investigate him for his involvement in Pfizer’s development of the COVID-19 vaccine. After receiving this information, the committee reached out to GSK, which doubled down on its initial claims. Reportedly, Dormitzer said that the timing of the vaccine was not a coincidence, and that “‘the three most senior people in Pfizer R&D were involved in a decision to deliberately slow down clinical testing’” to influence the outcome of the 2020 election. After compounding these claims with other evidence, the Judiciary Committee sent a letter to Dormitzer on March 15, requesting specific documentation pertaining to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine work alongside a transcribed interview. Dormitzer has since denied GSK’s allegations against him. Additionally, the scientist failed to comply with the committee’s request for documentation and an interview transcription. His decision to deny their initial request prompted the committee to issue a subpoena on June 30 claiming that Dormitzer’s participation is key to the investigation. According to the subpoena, Dormitzer’s attorney, Susan Brune, answered the committee’s initial request on May 29. Brune informed the committee that Dormitzer would not participate in an interview and failed to produce the requested documents. Any further information that the committee was seeking, Brune posited, could be gathered from Pfizer. The committee has said it is unwilling to accept Dormitzer’s refusal to testify. In the letter included with the subpoena notice, Chairman Jim Jordan wrote, “Based off the information we have obtained to date, the Committee believes [Dormitzer’s] testimony is critical… the Committee’s request to Pfizer is separate and unique from the Committee’s request to [Dormtizer].” Jordan went on to explain the severity of accusations against Dormitzer and other senior officials at Pfizer. Due to the potential impact of the alleged actions on the 2020 election, the accusations justify “substantial federal interest and [require] additional inquiry,” said Jordan, which could “in turn inform potential legislative reform.” Despite Dormitzer and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla’s claim that the timing of the COVID-19 vaccine testing and results were above board, the House Judiciary Committee presses on with its investigation. Now that he has been subpoenaed by the committee, Dormitzer can no longer dodge testifying before the committee in person. According to the subpoena, Dormitzer will appear for a deposition at 10 a.m. on July 22.  The post %POSTLINK% appeared first on %BLOGLINK%.

President Donald Trump is on a winning streak when it comes to negotiating peace deals, and he may be able to add another soon. In a Monday post on Truth Social, he wrote, "My Representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza. Israel has agreed...

Online meltdowns in the wake of President Donald Trump’s victory are all too familiar to Americans. Screams and tears became passé as liberals publicly displayed their cries of agony that Kamala Harris would not be inaugurated in 2025. However, in the midst of these unhinged reactions, there rose a much calmer group of liberal women who were smiling and laughing quietly as Trump took office.  The morning after the election, the “4 a.m. Club” was born. According to Gia Prism, a leader of the movement, there are thousands, or even millions of women in the club. On TikTok, there are over 30,000 videos with ‘#4amclub’ in their description. This cult-like group believes that before the election was decided in favor of Trump, a “spiritual call” was sent out to them, waking them at 4 the morning on November 6 and telling them that in an alternate universe or dimension, Kamala Harris won the presidency.  The leader of the group, a self-proclaimed psychic and healer who goes by Gia Prism online, explains what the group is all about: “We do not believe that the results we have now are the results we are going to end up with…[because] we were part of something unexplainable that happened to us on election night,” she said in reference to the thousands of women who were allegedly spiritually awakened at 4 a.m. on November 6.  Prism calls the experience “mystical” and members of the club now broadly refer to the moment as an awakening, in which women were enlightened to the spiritual world. These women claim that dreams of a Democrat victory filled their sleep. Others say that guides, angels, and ancestors told them everything would “be okay” and that the election was not what it seemed. Prism herself posted a video a few days after the election was over claiming that Kamala Harris appeared to her in a vision to reassure Prism that she would still ultimately triumph.  Overall, instead of accepting the results of the 2024 election, the 4 a.m. Club is holding out hope that a massive shift is taking place. According to Prism and her followers, Trump’s second term is somehow ushering in the “divine feminine” and a new order in which equity and progressivism thrive. The supposed call that went out on election night compels the 4 a.m. Club to “anchor the timeline” in which Harris is president. According to Prism, being an anchor means being a “physical vessel” for energy to enter, and from your body it can enter into the earth and become available in this timeline.  The belief that Harris won the election in a different timeline has fostered conspiracy theories. The Club believes that many things are possible since Harris is supposed to be in power. These strange theories include the president suffering a brain bleed, lower-level members of his staff being removed from power before he can follow suit, or Trump not being real, but having a body double. Justifiably, many on the right will be tempted to laugh this fringe phenomenon off. But it is important to shed light on this movement.  While the theories posited by the 4 a.m. Club are laughable, they are also offensive when one considers that they are coming from members of the same party that has constantly accused Republicans of delusion and denial related to the 2020 election. Now, they are looking to the stars and tarot cards for answers from alternate dimensions.  What the Club has made clear is that Democrats are still unable to face the reality of Donald Trump’s second term. No matter how many times The Club manifests a different election outcome or how patiently they await a change in leadership, Trump continues to implement his agenda.       The post %POSTLINK% appeared first on %BLOGLINK%.

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html