YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #freespeech #virginia #astronomy #nightsky #biology #deepstate #plantbiology #novac #terrorism #trafficsafety #underneaththestars #treason #stargaze #assaultcar #carviolence
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
3 d

Why did Trent Reznor even bother to write a diss track about Limp Bizkit?
Favicon 
faroutmagazine.co.uk

Why did Trent Reznor even bother to write a diss track about Limp Bizkit?

A battle for the ages. The post Why did Trent Reznor even bother to write a diss track about Limp Bizkit? first appeared on Far Out Magazine.
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
3 d

‘Eat It’: The parody that Weird Al Yankovic is most proud of
Favicon 
faroutmagazine.co.uk

‘Eat It’: The parody that Weird Al Yankovic is most proud of

Never looked back. The post ‘Eat It’: The parody that Weird Al Yankovic is most proud of first appeared on Far Out Magazine.
Like
Comment
Share
Nostalgia Machine
Nostalgia Machine
3 d

What Did Critics Think of ‘Hocus Pocus’ When It Was First Released? Read the 1993 Reviews
Favicon 
www.remindmagazine.com

What Did Critics Think of ‘Hocus Pocus’ When It Was First Released? Read the 1993 Reviews

It didn't quite put a spell on critics.
Like
Comment
Share
Let's Get Cooking
Let's Get Cooking
3 d

The $1.50 Dollar Tree Paper Towel Hack That Saves Kitchen Space
Favicon 
www.mashed.com

The $1.50 Dollar Tree Paper Towel Hack That Saves Kitchen Space

Paper towels are a kitchen essential, but you might not want them permanently crowding your counter. Luckily, Dollar Tree has a budget-friendly solution.
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
3 d

Hilarious And Insane: CNN Is Trying To Launch ANOTHER Subscription Service
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Hilarious And Insane: CNN Is Trying To Launch ANOTHER Subscription Service

by Paul Joseph Watson, Modernity News: No one is going to pay for CNN Fake news CNN is attempting to launch another subscription service, despite wasting hundreds of millions of dollars on its failed CNN + which sank like a stone in 2022. The network has announced that it is launching a new platform called […]
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
3 d

CDC Likely Concealing Measles Vaccine Failure
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

CDC Likely Concealing Measles Vaccine Failure

by Dr. Peter McCullough, Global Research: Agency lumps “unvaccinated” with “vaccine status unknown” in deceptive reporting With >600,000 measles cases per year around the world it’s hard to get excited over a few hundred or a few thousand cases in the United States. Confidence in routine vaccines is plummeting with more attention given to vaccine […]
Like
Comment
Share
Pet Life
Pet Life
3 d ·Youtube Pets & Animals

YouTube
Guy Chases Down Wild Wombats To Save Their Lives | The Dodo
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
3 d

Why Was the 642 CE Battle of Nahavand Called the “Victory of Victories?”
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

Why Was the 642 CE Battle of Nahavand Called the “Victory of Victories?”

  The Sassanid Empire, founded in 224 CE, started by defeating the Parthians. Calling themselves Eranshahr or “Empire of the Iranians”, at their height, they reigned from Pakistan to the Levant. Yet by the 630s, decades of conflict with the Byzantines, Arabs, and internal revolts left the Empire exhausted.    The wars had taken their toll. The upstart yet deadly Muslim armies occupied half of the Empire by 636. Even the imperial capital Ctesiphon fell in 637. The Empire’s young King Yazdegerd III sat on an uneasy throne.   Their Ascendant Opponent The Sassanid Empire Source: Wikimedia   While the Sassanids faltered, the Arabs remained energetic. Following the Prophet’s death in 632, the Rashidun Caliphate’s armies expanded Islam’s reach.   All of Arabia fell by 632 CE. The conquest of Egypt, the Levant, and sections of the Sassanid Empire would follow. Their armies decisively won with new tactics and their opponents’ exhaustion. Being religiously cohesive provided a purpose and identity, unlike the multi-ethnic empires they faced.   Around 637 CE, Arab armies pushed the Sassanids back into central Iran. The stage now stood for the Battle of Nahavand.   Nahavand’s Critical Importance Rashidun Caliphate Banner c. 642 Source: Wikimedia   Besides being a military and administrative center, Nahavand (near modern Hamadan) lay astride critical routes. Roads to Mesopotamia and Bactria connected here. Nahavand controlled access to the Zagros foothills (the Sassanid homeland) and the remaining strongholds.   The Eve of Battle   The inevitable high-stakes clash finally occurred in 642. For King Yazdigerd III, this battle was a make-or-break deal. Defeat meant the end of the Empire and its Zoroastrian faith. A victory would mean political stability.   For the Arabs, a victory meant occupying the remainder of Persia. Islam’s steady march could continue.   An All Out Effort Shahrbaraz (Sassanid) Cavalry Fighting. Source: Wikimedia via Alborz Fallah   The late summer or early fall of 642 CE saw the culmination of the Sassanid-Arab conflict. Since the disasters of 637, a low-grade war had simmered. But now, King Yazdegerd III called up his army. Sources vary, but upwards of 150,000 assembled, a mixed force of professionals, militia, and farmers. The King and Zoroastrian priests hailed this fight as a do-or-die. At a minimum, the Sassanids sought to halt the Arab advance.   The Rashidun Caliphate’s army consisted of approximately 30,000 soldiers. Inferior in numbers, these soldiers were now seasoned, mobile veterans. Plus, fresh victories and religious zeal bolstered their confidence. This Calphiate army, commanded by the experienced Nu’man ibn Muqarrin, now marched to Nahavand.   The Battle Commences   The Sassanid commander, Firuzan, knew of the approaching Arab army and prepared defenses in the hills around Nahavand. Firuzan understood his position as the settlement sat in a valley. Neither side anticipated how long the fighting would take.   Part One: Deception and Pursuit Rashidun Caliphate soldier c. 630s Source: Wikimedia   The Arabs carefully scouted as they approached Nahavand; Nu’man knew of the superior Sassanid strength and fortifications. A head-on attack would be disastrous. His army repeatedly skirmished with the enemy, sizing up responses and terrain. Upon reaching the area, Nu’man decided to use subterfuge.    The Arabs camped in the open valley within sight of the Sassanid defenses-a tempting target. Also, some sources claim that the Arabs managed to convince their enemy that their morale was low. The Sassanid commander, Firuzan, remained cautious, aware of disasters like al-Qadisiyyah.   With the knowledge that the Sassanids watched the Caliphate army, Nu’man began his deception. He ordered the camp to be abandoned. Despite looking chaotic, the pullback remained orderly. Nu’man’s disciplined troops headed out of the valley, hoping to goad the Sassanids.   Initially, Firuzan kept his army in their fortified heights. Against the battle-hardened Arabs, he knew his predominantly peasant army’s stood little chance. But with a change of mind, Firuzan broke camp.   Part Two: A Snap Decision’s Price Nahavand in Iraq Source: Farsnews.ir   The Sassanid army hotly pursued the Arabs from the valley. But being raw troops, their cohesion suffered. Once down from the heights and in the valley, Nu’man’s forces struck. Concealed cavalry hit from the sides, and infantry cut the Sassanid line of retreat. Here, the Sassanid numbers turned against them. Unable to maneuver in a cramped space, the Rashidun Caliphate army utterly destroyed the Imperial army. Thousands died, including Firuzan, in the chaos. The Arab leader Nu’man perished too, struck by a Persian arrow.    Part Three: The Aftermath and Collapse   With this crushing defeat, effective Sassanid resistance ended. Nahavand fell with immense spoils into Arab hands. Persia’s Islamic transformation now began. Yazdegerd would be assassinated in 651. So great was the Arab victory that the Rashidun Caliphate named the battle Fath al-Futuh, or “Victory of Victories.”
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
3 d

When Was the Mexican-American War? Key Dates Explained
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

When Was the Mexican-American War? Key Dates Explained

  The timing of the Mexican-American War was indicative of developments in North America in the decades following the War of 1812. Improving relations with Britain reduced the prospect of foreign intervention, enabling the United States to carry on its westward expansion unmolested. While the Mexican-American War was relatively short and bloodless compared to the American Civil War just over a decade later, it was a formative conflict in American history. The following dates chart the major developments over the course of the war.   March 1, 1845: United States Annexation of Texas Stamp commemorating the Republic of Texas, 1986. Source: National Postal Museum, Smithsonian Institution   While the Mexican-American War officially began in 1846, the primary catalyst of the conflict was the American annexation of the Republic of Texas over one year earlier on March 1, 1845. Texas had been part of Mexico when the country gained its independence from Spain in 1821 following eleven years of fighting, but the arrival of American settlers changed the character of the region and led to the Texas Revolution in October 1835.   The Texas Revolution was a short battle for liberty, lasting approximately six months. While Texas declared independence on March 2, 1836, the ensuing engagements were costly. The conflict saw heavy casualties during engagements including the Siege of Bexar, the Goliad Massacre, and the war’s decisive turning point at the Battle of San Jacinto. Meanwhile, the Siege of the Alamo lives on in American folklore to this day for the heroic last stand of Texan revolutionaries after nearly two weeks of resisting Mexican assaults.   After Texas secured its independence, many of the new republic’s citizens favoured rapid integration into the United States. To arrive at this objective, however, America had to navigate complex challenges including fierce political opposition and threats from Mexico, internal resistance from within Texas, domestic disagreements surrounding the status of slavery, and opposition from foreign powers to American expansionism. Despite these concerns, President John Tyler signed the Texas annexation bill shortly before leaving office in March 1845, sparking territorial disagreements with Mexico.   April 25, 1846: The Thornton Affair President James Polk as illustrated by Jacques Reich at the National Portrait Gallery, 1899-1920. Source: Smithsonian Institution   The Thornton Affair on April 25, 1846 is considered the first engagement of the Mexican-American War. The skirmish took place in the disputed region near the Texas-Mexico border. Prior to the action, the United States and Mexico engaged in a lengthy dispute over the southern boundary of Texas.   In hopes of remedying the conflict before the outbreak of war, President James Polk sent a special envoy for talks to resolve the border dispute and to purchase California and New Mexico from Mexico for $30 million. Viewing the mediation as an affront to Mexico’s territorial integrity, Mexican President José Joaquín de Herrera refused to entertain any negotiations. Herrera was soon toppled in a coup by General Mariano Paredes y Arrillaga, who likewise refused to negotiate.   As a result, President Polk dispatched American forces to the disputed region between the Nueces River and the Rio Grande River, hoping to incite conflict. The president’s wish was soon granted, and in late April 1846 United States Captain Seth Thorton was ambushed by Mexican troops in a clash that claimed the lives of 16 American soldiers, marking the outbreak of the Mexican-American War.   May 8-9, 1846: Battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma Broadside recruiting volunteers for service in the Mexican-American War, 1846. Source: Smithsonian Institution   The first major engagements of the Mexican-American War occurred even before Congress formally declared war on Mexico. One of the most significant confrontations early in the conflict was the Battle of Palo Alto on May 8, 1846. Future president Zachary Taylor commanded American troops during the engagement and achieved superiority through effective use of artillery. Taylor leveraged the flexibility of his light artillery batteries to counter a series of Mexican attacks.   The following day, on May 9, 1846, General Taylor again inflicted a decisive defeat over Mexican troops. At the Battle of Resaca de la Palma, American forces relentlessly pursued their adversaries after the enemy retreated to a hasty defensive position in the nearby town after defeat at Palo Alto. There, Taylor and his men captured key Mexican artillery positions, causing confusion amongst General Mariano Arista’s troops.   These victories near Brownsville, Texas, solidified United States control of Texas’ disputed border region, a strategic area during the Mexican-American War. American superiority in northern Mexico prevented the Mexicans from accessing vital supplies for future engagements further south. Conquests at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma enhanced Taylor’s public image, elevating him to the presidency in 1849. Taylor was in favor of granting statehood to California but died in July 1850 a few months before it happened.   September 21-24, 1846: Battle of Monterrey General Zachary Taylor at the National Portrait Gallery by Nathaniel Currier, 1847. Source: Smithsonian Institution   After key victories in the first major engagements of the Mexican-American War, General Taylor led his troops towards Monterrey, a strategic fortified stronghold in northeastern Mexico. Capturing the city, however, proved much more challenging compared to the American Army’s previous actions. Mexican troops exploited the fortification’s defenses efficiently, but after several waves of fierce offensives, General Ampudia’s forces began to lose ground to the United States.   As the battle matured, Taylor successfully secured the Bishop’s Palace, an elevated position west of Monterrey that overlooked avenues of approach into the city. After several days of fierce exchanges, America and Mexico agreed to a truce. While the United States was granted the city, surviving Mexican troops were permitted to keep their weapons as they departed the region, a particularly controversial decision from American troops and officers who knew more hostilities resided in their near future.   While the Battle of Monterrey ended with a negotiated truce, the occupation of the city represented major progress for the United States during the Mexican-American War. The victory gave America an advantageous foothold deeper into Mexico, boosting morale for further operations. In the months following victory in Mexico’s northeastern territories, the United States enjoyed key successes at the Battles of El Brazito, Buena Vista, and Sacramento River despite being significantly outnumbered in the latter two engagements. As spring of 1847 approached, American forces sought to end the conflict by landing at Veracruz and marching on Mexico City.   September 14, 1847: Capture of Mexico City General Winfield Scott, artist unknown, 1861. Source: National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution   The United States’ capture of Mexico City on September 14, 1847, essentially ended combat operations of the Mexican-American War. Six months earlier, on March 9, General Winfield Scott launched the first large-scale amphibious assault in American military history at Veracruz. Scott’s 12,000 men quickly encircled the garrison, cutting it off from much-needed supplies.   Closer to Mexico’s capital, the Battle of Chapultepec set conditions for the capture of Mexico City. On September 12, General Scott advanced towards Chapultepec Castle, a fortress on high-ground near Mexico City that served as a military academy. After overwhelming bombardments and infantry assaults, Mexican soldiers and cadets succumbed to the American offensive. The valiant defense, while unsuccessful, remains well-known in Mexican military circles today.   With Chapultepec under American control, General Scott moved towards Mexico City just one day later. By September 14, 1847, Mexico’s government officials already fled the capital city, leaving little military and civilian resistance to counter American occupation. The Stars and Stripes was raised over Mexico’s National Palace, representing the conclusion of the Mexican-American War. Scott’s landing at Veracruz and the march on Mexico City would influence American military doctrine during the American Civil War.   February 2, 1848: Signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo Relief map of the western United States by the Schmitz-Horning Co., 1930-1940. Source: Smithsonian Institution   Despite hostilities ending on September 14, 1847, the ensuing peace settlement was not signed until nearly half a year later on February 2, 1848. In addition to addressing the prewar border disputes by recognizing the Rio Grande as the southern border of Texas, Mexico was obliged to cede 525,000 square miles of land to America.   While Mexico was offered $15 million in compensation for its ceded regions, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo heavily favored the United States by granting the victor with territories that were later organized into the states of California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming, and Texas. The newly acquired lands fulfilled many of America’s political and economic ambitions in the 19th century.   The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo had a positive impact on the economic development and prosperity of the United States, but the conflict had lasting negative effects for other populations. Mexican citizens residing in ceded territories were given the choice of relocating to Mexico or remaining as full American citizens. This outcome heavily influenced Latino cultural influences in the southwestern United States that remain today.   In an echo of the harrowing Trail of Tears further east, the treaty forced Native American tribes from their homelands as American settlers moved west, and further inflamed tensions between North and South over slavery that led to the outbreak of the American Civil War just over a decade later. These consequences contribute to the controversial legacy of the Mexican-American War in modern society.  
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
3 d

There are something like 50 Muslim countries in the world. Pick one. Live your Sharia values there.
Favicon 
www.youtube.com

There are something like 50 Muslim countries in the world. Pick one. Live your Sharia values there.

There are something like 50 Muslim countries in the world. Pick one. Live your Sharia values there.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 396 out of 95613
  • 392
  • 393
  • 394
  • 395
  • 396
  • 397
  • 398
  • 399
  • 400
  • 401
  • 402
  • 403
  • 404
  • 405
  • 406
  • 407
  • 408
  • 409
  • 410
  • 411
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund