YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #bible #florida #texas #inflation #newyork
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
4 w

Law Could Give Americans 20 Years IN PRISON for Breaking Israel Boycott?
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Law Could Give Americans 20 Years IN PRISON for Breaking Israel Boycott?

from Glenn Greenwald: TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Like
Comment
Share
Pet Life
Pet Life
4 w ·Youtube Pets & Animals

YouTube
This Cow Wants To Be Wherever His Favorite People Are | The Dodo
Like
Comment
Share
Country Roundup
Country Roundup
4 w

See Who's Playing Dolly Parton in Her Live Musical
Favicon 
tasteofcountry.com

See Who's Playing Dolly Parton in Her Live Musical

Dolly Parton has found the actresses who will play her in her musical, 'Dolly: An Original Musical.' Continue reading…
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
4 w ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
AI Robot Starts to Freak Out and Attacks Handler... Should We Be Worried? With Chamath and Jason
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
4 w ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
Why would someone do this AND post about it?
Like
Comment
Share
Bikers Den
Bikers Den
4 w

PART 2 — IF I WAS TRUMP’S PRESS SECRETARY
Favicon 
blog.bikernet.com

PART 2 — IF I WAS TRUMP’S PRESS SECRETARY

I think we all remember, and I am very sure of this, because I never just make wild assumptions, but I think we all remember that a while back I explained here why I should be Trump’s press rep or whatever they’re called. In it I explained why the Press needs to be disrespected as often as possible and that I am the one for the job. But now I would like to explain just how those press conferences, or whatever they are, would actually play out for the viewing audience. And there would BE a viewing audience because my press conferences would be huge. First of all, the 50 or so keyboard slacks would not be all bunched together in a pile like they are in the shitshow-arrangement that currently is in existence. I am probably the only one left alive on earth who remembers Art Linkletter. Art Linkletter was a very popular TV personality when TV first came out. It had a live audience and it was broadcast live. One segment of the show had 4 kids between 6 and 8 or so lined up in a row of chairs and Art Linkletter was great with kids because he didn’t talk down to them, he talked to them like they were capable of carrying on a normal conversation. The segment was called Kids Say The Darndest Things. It was huge. The kids would all be of course pre-selected for their ability to actually hold a conversation. So, Art Linkletter would have a mike in his hand and approach them one at a time, kneeling on one knee and making it face-to-face for the toddlers and he would ask them questions that were designed to get them to inadvertently or maybe enthusiastically rat out their parents, Art Linkletter could hold an adult’s interest and he could hold a child’s interest. He was huge for a reason. Segments are probably on the internet. So, I would hold my press conferences the way Art Linkletter conducted Kids Say The Darndest Things. All the news hacks would be in a straight line, in folding chairs, one next to the other, with a good space between each to give a sense of isolation when I came over to kneel on one knee in front of them and hold a mike between us. I would be very animated when I talked to each as though they were just the most fascinating people I had ever met. I would make them more known to the television audience. I would ask them their name, where they worked and since I am more or less one of them I could easily do this with the difference between me and them being I have some actual talent and ability and an intelligence that is operating properly and am aware that they are all basically indifferent fuckheads who just want to fuck with people and not actually get to the bottom of things like they pretend they want to do. That they’re worthless parasites living off the fear they ignite in their listeners. A typical interview would go like this: “Thank you, thank you, good to see you all here. Well, I guess you all are very likely have questions that you simply absolutely need to get answered, and I am sure they are the ones the viewing audience is also the most concerned about and not just some rambling, leading, accusatory, loaded, ideology-driven attempt at verbal assassination. So! Let’s do this. Yes! You in the wrinkled suit and the very photogenic face, hold on, let me come over to you. (Going over, getting on one knee and holding a mike) So!! And who am I talking to today? Jim. Do you have a last name, Jim? Acosta. Is that Italian? Spanish? So, Jim, I know you have a question, but first can you tell everyone where you work? You’re unemployed. I see. You once worked for CNN. Well, you know, things can only improve: for CNN AND you. CNN is basically a shitshow anyway. It can only go UP at this point. Can I say that? Can I say shitshow? (looking around at imaginary staff while grinning) Jim, since you’re out of work how is it you were even allowed access here? And no offense intended, I mean I’M glad you’re here, don’t get me wrong. Can I interrupt myself for a second, Jim? Do they ever tell you that you remind them of George Clooney? But with cuter kinda fat puffy cheeks? JIM, COME BACK!  Well, I guess my questions were just too hard-hitting. Well, let’s see, who else has a question. Yes, you, the burly, angry-looking man over there, hold on, let me come over there…..(kneeling on one knee) Ok. So, tell me, what’s your name. Rachel Maddow. Wow! Whoa! Wait! You’re huge! What are doing here? ….so…. you say your ratings are tanking. Well, I’M glad you’re here if no one else is: I get to see your face writhe and contort while you have faux emotional breakdowns right here in person. So: what’s your question. Do you really chop your own firewood by the way? WHERE ARE YOU GOING?  Well, I’ll be very sensitive. But, hey, she IS a gal! Well, let’s see, yes, you there, the man I can hardly see, hold on, let me move towards you, are your feet even reaching the floor?…..GEORGE STEPHANOPOULIS!!! YOU RASCAL!! YOU’RE SO CUTE! What are you 4-8? 4-9? George I’m kidding, hey, c’mon. So, George, before you ask your question let me ask YOU, do you write your own questions for an interview? Or does an intern from one of the high schools write them. (me yelling to an imaginary staffer) CAN WE GET GEORGE A FOOTSTOOL? SOMEBODY? HIS FEET ARE JUST DANGLING ABOVE THE FLOOR! George, I’m sorry, really, wait, you’re leaving? No, I’m really sorry, I didn’t mean anything. (me getting up from one knee) Here, let me help you down off that chair. (me looking around) Well, he stormed out. I’m losing my audience! Haha except for the ones at home! SO! Who else has a question. Yes, you, the woman over there in the mismatched pantsuit. They still have pantsuits? Anyone? (looking around) (looking back at who I called-on) I guess you have the last one, hold on….OK. So tell me, what is your name? Greta Van Susteren. It SOUNDS familiar, hold on, lemme think. Nope, can’t remember. No matter! SO! What kind of a question do you have for me today. But wait, hold on: can I ask you something? It’s been on my mind since I first saw you. You know how beautiful women start going to plastic surgeons….THEY STILL CALL THEM THAT, ANYONE?…..no matter, so, anyway, as I was saying, you know how beautiful women who are just fucking HOT as hell, they go to a plastic surgeon or whatever they are called now, and they hand over a hundred grand or so, and when the guy gets done….they look like burn victims from an oil-refinery fire? So, here’s my question….do you think that in YOUR case?……that you would come out beautiful?? Kind of like it’s the plastic surgeon fucking-up in the wrong direction? Or in your case the right direction? Just a thought. Might be worth a shot. So!….what’s your…..where are you going?” (me looking around) Another one left. Pretty soon there’ll be no one here. Except for the viewers at home of course. There’s pro’bly advertisers LINING-UP to sponsor these press conferences. Would that be Constitutional? Anyone?  You all claim to be Constitutional watchdogs, I notice. Can Diet Coke sponsor press conferences do you suppose? Imagine government EARNING money instead of just taking it from people. WHOA! Revolutionary. Well, let’s see: who we gut left. Hold on! I see three fellows who look identical. AND NOT IN A GOOD WAY! Haha, just kidding of course, hold on, let me just get over to these three blokes. So! Let me start with you. (as I take a knee) What is your name, sir? Joe Scarborough. And you?… sitting on his right? You are?….John Oliver…..and you, over here on his left?…..Chris Hayes. Hold on, let me get to my feet here and back up a bit and just look at the three of you……..(after a long time, and still standing)……are you three related? Were you all forceps babies? No, real question! I’m one myself Really! But I look normal! Well, not NOW of course, now I look like fucking Methuselah, but in my younger days I looked ok, eyes far apart: in the right place: All-American kind of look. You three all look like you went through the transporter wrong. Like there was a Klingon attack just at the same time the transfer was taking place and the three of you all had your faces compressed in all four directions, top to bottom and side to side, like two vices were at work, working as a team. I mean, Chris, the whites of your eyes at the bottom are all I see, like, I dunno, like your irises are trying to look up to heaven for assistance in getting a better job. And John, I dunno. You’d be tough to kiss for any woman, especially at the slow-approach before contact. But JOE!!!….Jesus. And you have a hot wife. What’s her name?…Mika….Brzzelzebub? Close enough. And she’s a fuckin’ looker. She kisses that mug? Holy fucking shit, AND I’M SORRY PEOPLE, EXCUSE MY LANGUAGE, but FUCK!!!!! What IS it with you three??? I KNOW it’s not Down Syndrome, cause THOSE people are intelligent and YOU three are….well, let’s not go into it, I mean why pile-it-on. But holy sweet angels and the saints. I think I’m actually going to puke. OK JUST KIDDING EVERYONE! RELAX! On the PLUS side?…..my vomit would be easier on the eyes. I mean, I thought Greta was bad. She’s Taylor Swift compared to you three. You know what?….everyone else so far has left on their own. But you three, I’m gonna haffta just ask you to leave. Through a television screen I can handle those mugs but seeing you all right here together and us not separated electronically and from thousands of miles away? It’s some brutal shit, man. It’s like looking at Cher, Madonna, and Whoopie Golberg simultaneously. Now imagine me keeping this up for two hours a day. It’d be legendary.______J.J. Solari Don’t miss the shop for something cool… The post PART 2 — IF I WAS TRUMP’S PRESS SECRETARY appeared first on Bikernet.com - Online Biker Magazine.
Like
Comment
Share
Bikers Den
Bikers Den
4 w ·Youtube General Interest

YouTube
Are Indian Motorcycles 100% Made in America? ?️??
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
4 w

FDA Criticized For COVID-19 Jab Announcement
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

FDA Criticized For COVID-19 Jab Announcement

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee will meet later this month to “to publicly discuss and make recommendations on the selection of the 2025-2026 Formula for COVID-19 vaccines for use in the United States.” The meeting will take place on May 22nd. Today, the FDA announced that on May 22, 2025, the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee will meet to publicly discuss and make recommendations on the selection of the 2025-2026 Formula for COVID-19 vaccines for use in the United States.… pic.twitter.com/hvsfPoRtag — U.S. FDA (@US_FDA) May 7, 2025 From the FDA: On May 22, 2025, the committee will meet in open session to discuss and make recommendations on the selection of the 2025-2026 Formula for COVID-19 vaccines for use in the United States. The meeting presentations will be heard, viewed, captioned, and recorded through an online teleconferencing and/or video conferencing platform. FDA intends to make background material available to the public no later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post the background material on its website prior to the meeting, the background material will be made publicly available on FDA’s website at the time of the advisory committee meeting. Background material and the link to the online teleconference and/or video conference meeting will be available at the Advisory Committee calendar. Scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee meeting link. The meeting will include slide presentations with audio and video components to allow the presentation of materials in a manner that most closely resembles an in-person advisory committee meeting. The FDA faced fierce criticism for the announcement: No safe and effective COVID shot exists to select… Try again, @US_FDA. https://t.co/mKN11j3lDH — Children’s Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) May 7, 2025 I assume this means taking them off the market is not under consideration. Blood on their hands. @DrMakaryFDA https://t.co/7Bt0C82Wmm — Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) May 7, 2025 How about…….. No Never worked and still don’t work. All harm, no benefit!! https://t.co/dQN2YfV7EO — Brian Tyson, MD (@btysonmd) May 7, 2025 ban all Covid 19 "vaccines" and anything to do with mRNA platforms ASAP. Stop this poison immediately. https://t.co/gN2fZjB3Jw — Andy Thomas (@PstrAThomas) May 7, 2025 Glad to see there’s discussion but we want the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine taken off the market and taken off the childhood vaccine schedule. It is not safe. It is not effective. We have 30,000 deaths in the US. We have turbo cancers. We have sinewy blood clots. We have strokes. We… https://t.co/tEV93Z2jAL — MomoMoni (@Shakapahona) May 7, 2025 According to previous reports, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is considering removing the COVID-19 jab from the CDC’s recommended childhood immunization schedule. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Considers Removal Of Vaccine From CDC Recommended Childhood Immunization Schedule, Report Says From POLITICO: Eliminating the vaccine from the CDC schedule would not bar kids from receiving it. But the change would represent an extraordinary intervention by Kennedy to override the agency’s scientific decision-making and reverse a recommendation backed by the CDC and a slate of independent advisers just three years ago. The removal would also likely influence vaccination procedures across the nation. Pediatricians rely on the CDC schedule to determine which vaccines they should give children and when to administer them, in order to protect against a range of common infectious diseases. The schedule is also closely watched by insurers in deciding which vaccines to cover, as well as states and localities that determine which vaccines schools require for students — though no states currently mandate the Covid shot. The specifics of the removal are still under discussion and could change, said the two people, who were granted anonymity to discuss private deliberations.
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
4 w

The First James O’Keefe “Bombshell” Just Dropped — Just One Big Marketing Stunt?
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

The First James O’Keefe “Bombshell” Just Dropped — Just One Big Marketing Stunt?

The first of what I believe are to be three “bombshells” from James O’Keefe just dropped. You might recall last week when O’Keefe posted this (overly dramatic?) video claiming the report he was about to release was going to be so massive they would probably try to suicide him fore it. James O’Keefe Releases Chilling Message: “I Am Not Suicidal…Please Pray for Me” I like James O'Keefe and I think he's done great work over the course of his career, but I called out the overly dramatic video and bad acting at the time he posted it. Now today we find out if he's going to put up or shut up. I'll let you decide.... The big bombshell is....drumroll please: Prince Andrew was having sex with minors. Take a look: WORLD EXCLUSIVE: 'Prince Andrew Was F*ing Underage Girls' — Tape of Royal Family Advisor Exposes Prince Andrew’s Sexual Relations with Minors and Deep Ties to Jeffrey Epstein pic.twitter.com/NS517Kob18 — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) May 7, 2025 FULL TRANSCRIPT: Prince Andrew, he was in the Navy.He was two hundred and fifty days at sea.He never saw me. I was really pissed because he lied to me — Epstein.And then I did a big thing in the Daily Mail saying that I believed Andrew.And then I found out he was lying. I was so pissed. I didn't know that he was f***ing wandering Colonel.That's not cool. John Bryan has been a close confidant to the British royal family for a long time.He worked for Queen Elizabeth II, was quote "best friends" with Princess Diana,and had a long-term intimate relationship with the Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson. According to Bryan, he practically raised Sarah Ferguson's children — the princesses Beatrice and Eugenie.And Bryan said that he maintained a friendship with Ferguson's husband, the Duke of York, Prince Andrew. I've been so famous at times,when I was on the front page of every newspaper.Because I was working with the Queen of England.I was working with all the families. Princess Diana was my best friend.And I met the Duchess of New York — that's Prince Andrew's wife.They were separated. And I sort of fell in love.And we lived together... And I raised her two little children —her two little children, Beatrice and Eugenie.And Eugenie — those were my children.Those were my kids. I raised those kids. Day-to-day raising.I was father to the boys. Prince Andrew's connection to Jeffrey Epstein emerged in 2010when photos showed them walking together in New York's Central Park.Epstein had already been convicted in 2008of procuring a fourteen-year-old girl for prostitution. In 2014, a woman named Virginia Giuffre alleged in a Florida court filingthat Jeffrey Epstein paid her to have sex with Prince Andrew when she was 17 — a minor.On April 25th, a few weeks ago, Giuffre died by quote, "suicide." Prince Andrew denied Giuffre's sex abuse allegationsin a now-infamous 2019 BBC interview. Prince Andrew:She said she had sex with you three times.Once on his private island, in a group of seven or eight other girls. No.No to all of it.All of it.Absolutely no to all of it. The interview was a public relations disaster for the royal familyand prompted the Queen to strip Prince Andrew of his royal duties. In the aftermath of that interview, the Prince sought advicefrom a long-time royal family confidant, John Bryan. Oh very good.Oh no, we're very surprised.We can go up to dinner tonight. He'd have dinner at my house to see his kids.So then we go on a holiday.We sell the bread.And I get a big property — like ten acres. Right near fing Saint-Tropez, right?You know, nobody has ten acres.I'm on the biggest fing property in your class. And I rent it so that we have clients, right?Because there's paparazzi everywhere.There's hundreds of paparazzi. And he was in the Navy.He was two hundred and fifty days at sea.Never saw him again. Two weeks after Prince Andrew's BBC interview,John Bryan was brought to the Royal Lodge, where Prince Andrew lives,to offer crisis management advice. According to The Telegraph,the meeting was conducted discreetly at the royal residence. Bryan observed that Prince Andrew was visibly distressed and struggling to focus,reportedly unable to concentrate for more than forty minutes at a timedue to the strain he was under. As reported in the Daily Mail,John Bryan constructed a five-page document emphasizingthat Prince Andrew should publicly show empathy for Epstein's victims. Back in November 2022,Bryan publicly stated that he believed Prince Andrewwas innocent of the claims made against himrelated to the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking scheme. Now, in our exclusive hidden camera undercover footage,John Bryan reveals for the first timethat Prince Andrew did, in fact, have sex with underage girls... I was so pissed about that.I was really pissed.I was really pissed because he lied to me about Epstein. I knew he saw him.But he lied to me — that he was such a close friend.That was no lie. Now our newsroom has some concerns about where this investigation is headedand who may be implicated. But our only motivation in doing these storiesis the public's right to know. And if this report and our subsequent reports shine a light into darknessand expose evil,then we are willing to take the risks. At the end of the day,child victims of Jeffrey Epstein need to be protectedand the people involved need to be held accountable by law enforcement — immediately. Without accountability,our notion of freedom is just an illusion. We're going to be breaking our next storiesexclusively at okeefmediagroup.com. You may see this Project Veritas sign behind me.Stay tuned for next. Full screen video here with captions added if you prefer: WORLD EXCLUSIVE: 'Prince Andrew Was F*ing Underage Girls' — Tape of Royal Family Advisor Exposes Prince Andrew’s Sexual Relations with Minors and Deep Ties to Jeffrey Epstein pic.twitter.com/NS517Kob18 — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) May 7, 2025 Your thoughts? I have to say I'm not real impressed. Didn't we already know this? I mean, the Queen basically kicked him out of the Royal Family, didn't she? Is this really new information? Apparently a second and a third video are still coming and are supposed to be different but perhaps related in some way. There were also rumors one of the videos would be exposing Pam Bondi, and so far that's not the case but there are still two to come. We had that report earlier today. PAM BONDI: Dr. Jekyll or Mrs. Hyde? Alex Jones Reveals Very Concerning Information To me, the Prince Andrew story was a real snoozer, but the most interesting thing was James O'Keefe standing in front of a brick wall with the Project Veritas logo prominently displayed behind him. He even mentions it once, but doesn't say why. Folks, if this whole three video "bombshell" tease is just to draw attention to the fact that he purchased Project Veritas back or merged with them or something, I'm going to be pretty pissed off. I think O'Keefe has done good work in the past, but don't give us all this hype and only pay off a marketing stunt. That won't go over so well. I hope I'm wrong.
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
4 w

BREAKING: Stephen Miller’s AFL SUES Chief Justice John Roberts!
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

BREAKING: Stephen Miller’s AFL SUES Chief Justice John Roberts!

Perhaps Supreme Court Justices are not above the law after all? Tremendous news to report as Stephen Miller’s America First Legal group has just filed a lawsuits against Chief Justice John Roberts! Stephen Miller’s America First Legal has filed a lawsuit against Chief Justice John Roberts. Its beginning. pic.twitter.com/wFAYQqq3de — X22 Report (@X22Report) May 6, 2025 Here is a quick summary of what’s going on, and then we’ll jump in and go deeper: Stephen Miller’s America First Legal Foundation (AFL) has initiated a lawsuit against Chief Justice John Roberts and Robert J. Conrad, Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The case, filed on April 22, 2025, is presided over by Judge Trevor N. McFadden, a Trump appointee. Overview of the Lawsuit: FOIA Requests: AFL submitted Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests seeking communications between the Judicial Conference, the Administrative Office, and Democratic lawmakers, specifically Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Representative Hank Johnson. These lawmakers have been involved in inquiries concerning ethical conduct of Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. Denial of Requests: The Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office denied these FOIA requests, asserting that they are part of the judicial branch and thus exempt from FOIA, which applies to executive agencies. Legal Argument: AFL contends that the Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office perform functions characteristic of executive agencies, such as policy-making and administrative tasks, and should therefore be subject to FOIA and presidential oversight. They argue that these bodies are not courts per se and thus fall outside the judiciary’s exemption from FOIA. Potential Implications: If AFL’s lawsuit succeeds, it could redefine the boundaries between the executive and judicial branches, potentially allowing the executive branch greater control over entities traditionally considered part of the judiciary. Legal experts have expressed skepticism about the lawsuit’s merits, viewing it as a challenge to judicial independence and an attempt to expand executive power.  Current Status: The case is currently under review in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Given the constitutional questions involved, it may progress through the appellate system, potentially reaching the Supreme Court. Now let’s get into more details…. Here is AFL making the official announcement: “A pro-Trump legal group founded by White House aide Stephen Miller is suing Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts… The lawsuit was filed by America First Legal.” pic.twitter.com/33QjS9j5xO — America First Legal (@America1stLegal) May 6, 2025 Fox News had more details: The complaint accuses both the U.S. Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts of performing certain regulatory actions that go beyond the scope of resolving cases or controversies, or administratively supporting those actions, which they argue are the “core functions” of the judiciary. It also argues that records held by the Roberts-led U.S. Judicial Conference should therefore be subject to the Freedom of Information Act requests, or FOIA requests, as a result. AFL cited in its lawsuit recent actions taken by both the Judicial Conference and Administrative Office in 2023 to “accommodate” requests from Congress to investigate allegations of ethical improprieties by Justices Thomas and Alito, and subsequently to create or adopt an “ethics code” for justices on the high court. “Under our constitutional tradition, accommodations with Congress are the province of the executive branch,” AFL said, adding: “The Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office are therefore executive agencies,” and must therefore be overseen by the president, not the courts. The U.S. Judicial Conference is the national policymaking body for the courts. It is overseen by the Supreme Court’s chief justice, and tasked with making twice-yearly recommendations to Congress as needed. The Administrative Office for the U.S. Courts, meanwhile, operates under the guidance and supervision of the Judicial Conference. Its role is to provide administrative support to the federal courts on certain administrative issues and for day-to-day logistics, including setting budgets and organizing data, among other things. Plaintiffs for AFL, led by attorney Will Scolinos, argued in their lawsuit that the Judicial Conference’s duties are “executive functions,” and functions they allege must be supervised by executive officers “who are appointed and accountable to other executive officers.” Further, AFL argued, “Courts definitively do not create agencies to exercise functions beyond resolving cases or controversies or administratively supporting those functions.” In their view, this is also sufficient to put the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts — as it is overseen by the Judicial Conference — under the executive branch as well.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 4377 out of 80480
  • 4373
  • 4374
  • 4375
  • 4376
  • 4377
  • 4378
  • 4379
  • 4380
  • 4381
  • 4382
  • 4383
  • 4384
  • 4385
  • 4386
  • 4387
  • 4388
  • 4389
  • 4390
  • 4391
  • 4392
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund