“No Kings” protests return as Trump continues his nationwide crime crackdown, a new investigation exposes dark money behind anti-Trump demonstrations, and Israel strikes Gaza after Hamas reportedly violates the ceasefire. It’s Monday, October 20, 2025, and this is the news you need to know to start your day. Morning Wire is available on video! You can watch today’s episode here: If you would rather listen to your news, today’s edition of the Morning Wire podcast can be heard below: The Return Of ‘No Kings’ Topline: As President Donald Trump continues his anti-immigration crackdown, deploying more National Guardsmen nationwide, hundreds of thousands gathered for protests against him and his policies. On Saturday, potentially more than a million demonstrators took part in anti-Trump No Kings protests at more than 2000 locations around the country. While the demonstrations were largely peaceful, there were some pockets of violence. Join us now during our exclusive Deal of the Decade. Get everything for $7 a month. Not as fans. As fighters. Go to DailyWire.com/Subscribe to join now. In Portland, three protesters were arrested following an alleged assault. In the Chicago area, 15 people were arrested after clashing with law enforcement outside of an ICE facility. In Los Angeles, police deployed tear gas after declaring an unlawful assembly. Protesters expressed anger with nearly every action Trump has taken since taking office, but his illegal immigration crackdown and subsequent National Guard deployments were at the forefront. The protests were notable for another reason: the attendees appeared to be much older than a typical protest crowd.   The Billionaires Backing ‘No Kings’ Topline: All the focus on the No Kings protests over the last week has drawn attention to the organizations fueling them. Now, a new report from Peter Schweizer and his Government Accountability Institute (GAI) found nearly $300 million from billionaire-backed networks is being funneled to the protests’ organizers. Morning Wire spoke with Seamus Bruner, director of research at GAI and author of the book “Contrologarchs,” about the dollar trail. (The following transcript has been lightly edited for clarity.) Morning Wire: With all the noise surrounding these No Kings protests, your team dug into the organizations conducting them. What did you find? Bruner: What we found is that these are extremely well-funded, these organizations. We calculated over $200 million, really closer to $300 million in the last five years has gone into the partner organization. This is basically anything but grassroots. Morning Wire: Right – and this is part of a larger pattern when it comes to left-wing protests. You guys have tracked that, what you’ve been calling Riot Inc., which includes events like the No Kings protest. Unpack that for us. Who is behind this exactly? Bruner: Yeah, so the main person who keeps coming up is George Soros. And we thought, well, it’s not just George Soros and his Open Society institutes. He’s a main financier of all kinds of left-wing projects, including the protest industrial complex. But there’s also this Arabella network. … They are a major financier of these protest movements and groups. There’s also the Tides funding network, the Ford Foundation funding network – we’ve looked at probably a dozen or so funding networks with more than $10 billion flowing through these accounts. But the main ones we put into our report were the Soros, Arabella, Tides, and a few other funding networks. Morning Wire: We’ve had lots of leftwing protests over the years get very, very violent. Is there a sense that there is going to be some accountability for these institutions funding these protests? Bruner: That’s my sense. I was at the White House last week talking with President Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel. They all seem very locked in on this issue, wanting to get to the money, not just the boots on the ground and the people committing the violence, but who is financing this. I’ve spoken with some people at Homeland Security Investigations. They seem to be very interested in the follow-the-money aspect. I think that they are working their way up. Morning Wire: Related to that – we’ve just seen the Trump administration label “Antifa” a terrorist organization. How does that impact the sense that, again, there’s going to be some movement in terms of tracking down and holding accountable some of these groups funding things that turn violent? Bruner: At the end of the day, the people who they arrest, whether they’re domestic terrorists or not, are going to be charged with violent crimes. These are the people who are assaulting ICE officers, setting fire to cars and buildings. And so I don’t think that they’re going to be arresting anybody as a domestic terrorist who hasn’t actually committed some sort of crime. Morning Wire: The Democrats counter this by claiming that “Antifa” is actually a myth. It’s not actually an organization and thus a false label. What’s your response to that? Bruner: It’s preposterous to say that Antifa isn’t an organization just because it doesn’t have an LLC or EIN or some sort of corporate entity. There’s all kinds of groups that don’t have corporate entities that can be investigated as organizations. … But law enforcement has the tools to follow the money even in those ways that we don’t. Ceasefire In Jeopardy After Hamas Violence Topline: Vice President JD Vance is set to visit the Middle East this week as violent clashes in Gaza buffet President Trump’s historic Middle East peace deal. The first violation: The State Department said in a statement on Saturday that: “The United States has informed the guarantor nations of the Gaza peace agreement of credible reports indicating an imminent ceasefire violation by Hamas against the people of Gaza.” The warning from the State Department comes after videos have surfaced on social media over the past week of Hamas militants conducting public executions or essentially torturing Gazans for alleged crimes. President Donald Trump said in an interview on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” that Hamas will be disarmed one way or another. “They promised they would [disarm]. They said they would. It’s [written] down that they would,” said Trump. “If we have to, we’ll disarm them.” He clarified that the United States would not send soldiers into Gaza and that a proxy could fight Hamas: “Could be Israel with our backing. We won’t have boots on the ground. There’s no reason to.” The second violation: Israel has accused Hamas of violating the ceasefire for attacks against the IDF. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with his security cabinet on Sunday to discuss the future of the ceasefire. The IDF is still holding behind the so-called “yellow line” that was agreed upon as part of the first phase of the truce. According to the IDF, Hamas militants came out of a tunnel in IDF territory and fired an anti-tank rocket at Israeli forces that killed two soldiers. Israel responded by launching around 20 airstrikes across Gaza. Hamas didn’t deny the attack; the terrorist group said that because it happened in an area under Israeli control, “contact has been severed with our groups that remained there.” Future of peace: Trump is still optimistic about his plan for peace in the Middle East. The U.S. military is in the region watching over the ceasefire. Vance and special envoy Steve Witkoff will be in Israel this week to monitor the ceasefire closely. Despite the chaos, Trump has said he expects an expansion of the Abraham Accords soon.

President Donald Trump said Sunday night that the ceasefire was still in place after Israel launched strikes in Gaza after accusing Hamas of opening fire on its soldiers over the weekend.  Israel attacked parts of Gaza on Sunday after accusing Hamas terrorists of killing two Israel Defense Forces soldiers operating in Rafah. Despite the back-and-forth, Trump told reporters on Air Force One that the ceasefire was still in place.  “We’re going to have to see what’s happening. We want to make sure that it’s going to be very peaceful with Hamas and as you know, they’ve been quite rambunctious,” he said. “They’ve been doing some shooting and we think maybe the leadership isn’t involved in that. You know, some rebels within, but either way, it’s going to be handled properly. It’s going to be handled toughly but properly.” Later on, when asked by a reporter if he believed the Israeli strikes were justified, Trump said that he would “have to get back to you on that.”  The IDF said Sunday that terrorists launched anti-tank missiles and gunfire at its troops working to “dismantle terrorist infrastructure” in southern Gaza.  Join us now during our exclusive Deal of the Decade. Get everything for $7 a month. Not as fans. As fighters. Go to DailyWire.com/Subscribe to join now. “In response, the IDF has begun striking in the area to eliminate the threat and dismantle tunnel shafts and military structures used for terrorist activity,” the IDF said. “These terrorist actions constitute a blatant violation of the ceasefire agreement, and the IDF will respond firmly.” The IDF later said that these strikes were directed toward weapons storage facilities, firing posts, terrorist cells, and terror infrastructure. It also took out about six kilometers of “underground terrorist infrastructure,” the IDF said.  Vice President JD Vance, who is expected to travel to Israel on Tuesday, said Sunday that there were still a lot of moving parts on the ground in Gaza that complicated the ceasefire.  “We don’t actually know even what the reality on the ground is there. When we talk about Hamas, you’re talking about 40 different cells. It’s disjointed. Some of those cells will probably honor the ceasefire. Many of those cells, as we saw some evidence of today, will not. Before we actually can ensure that Hamas is properly disarmed that’s going to require, as we know, some of these Gulf Arab states, to get forces in there to actually apply some law and order and some security keeping on the ground.” Vance also said that the ceasefire would likely include “fits and starts” because members of Hamas would fire on Israel, and Israel would have to respond. 

Vice President JD Vance is expected to visit the Middle East on Tuesday to push the second phase of the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas as it teeters on renewed violence from the terror group. Israel accused Hamas of violating the ceasefire on Sunday after militants appeared out of a tunnel in Israeli-controlled territory in Gaza and killed two Israeli soldiers in an anti-tank rocket attack. In response, the Israeli military launched around 20 airstrikes across Gaza, according to Axios. Hamas did not deny the attack, though it said that it was carried out by a faction or militants that were not acting on orders from Hamas leadership. “We are not aware of any incidents or clashes taking place in the Rafah area, because these are zones under Israeli control, and contact has been severed with our groups that remained there,” Hamas said in a statement, according to Axios. Join us now during our exclusive Deal of the Decade. Get everything for $7 a month. Not as fans. As fighters. Go to DailyWire.com/Subscribe to join now. In addition to the attack, Hamas continues to be in violation of phase one of the ceasefire deal by failing to return all the bodies of the deceased hostages. About half of the deceased remain in Gaza, and the terror group has said it needs more time to locate them. The United States and Israel have made separate accusations against the terror group in recent days of violating the terms of the ceasefire agreement that saw Israel withdraw from roughly half of Gaza and release hundreds of Palestinian prisoners. The U.S. State Department on Saturday said in a statement that the “United States has informed the guarantor nations of the Gaza peace agreement of credible reports indicating an imminent ceasefire violation by Hamas against the people of Gaza.” The State Department’s statement is “likely related to Hamas’ crackdown on the Palestinian population since the ceasefire went into effect,” according to Foundation for Defense of Democracies senior research analyst Joe Truzman. Since the ceasefire officially began last week, videos have surfaced on social media of Hamas militants publicly executing or brutally beating Gazans. In one video, militants drop large rocks on a man’s legs before beating him with a pipe. Trump has repeatedly said that Hamas will disarm, or they will be disarmed. He repeated that promise in an interview with Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” that aired on Sunday. “They promised they would [disarm]. They said they would. It’s [written] down that they would,” said Trump. “If we have to, we’ll disarm them.” He clarified that the United States would not send soldiers into Gaza and that a proxy could fight Hamas: “Could be Israel with our backing. We won’t have boots on the ground. There’s no reason to.” The actions of Hamas militants inside and outside its zone of control in the Gaza Strip have strained the already tenuous ceasefire in place between the terror group and Israel. Vance is expected to visit Israel with U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff to provide more direct oversight of the terms of the peace agreement. One major point of tension in the peace process is the requirement that Hamas be disarmed. “There is no security infrastructure currently that would ensure Hamas is disarmed,” Vance said on Sunday evening.

Don Lemon’s recent comments encouraging Black and brown Americans to arm themselves against ICE operations have sparked fierce backlash, inciting concerns over the potential endangerment of federal officers. Lemon’s Controversial Remarks on ICE During an October 15, 2025 appearance on the “The Left Hook with Wajahat Ali” podcast, former CNN host Don Lemon suggested that Black and brown Americans should legally acquire firearms in response to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations. Lemon framed his comments around Second Amendment rights, questioning whether ICE’s actions represented government overreach. While claiming he wasn’t promoting violence, the remarks were perceived by many as dangerously inciting potential violence against federal agents. The controversy unfolded as Lemon’s comments came amidst a period of heightened immigration enforcement under President Trump’s second term. Reports indicate that 53% of voters view the administration’s immigration tactics as overly aggressive and unfair. Lemon’s rhetoric has intensified the debate, especially as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reported a more than 1,000% increase in assaults against ICE officers, further complicating the already tense environment. Public Safety and Political Speech The implications of Lemon’s statements extend beyond immediate public safety concerns, touching on broader issues of political speech boundaries. With ICE officers facing increased personal safety risks, the framing of armed resistance as a constitutional right raises questions about the responsibilities of media figures when discussing contentious political issues. Lemon’s statements have fueled a polarized narrative, with conservative media outlets criticizing his comments as an incitement to violence against law enforcement. Critics argue that Lemon’s remarks could normalize viewing ICE agents as targets for armed resistance, potentially leading to dangerous confrontations. The escalation of threats against ICE personnel, documented by DHS, underscores the delicate balance between civil liberties advocacy and public safety. This incident highlights the need for careful consideration of rhetoric’s impact on real-world scenarios, particularly when discussing law enforcement operations. Broader Implications for Civil Liberties and Media The controversy surrounding Lemon’s comments underscores the ongoing debate about the intersection of civil liberties and federal law enforcement. The framing of Second Amendment rights in the context of resisting ICE operations introduces a new dimension to the discussion on government overreach. This incident may influence future media guidelines and civil liberties debates, as it challenges the boundaries of acceptable commentary from influential media figures. The incident also raises questions about the role of media in shaping public discourse and the potential consequences of rhetoric that blurs the line between advocacy and incitement. As political polarization continues to influence public opinion, this case serves as a reminder of the power of media platforms in shaping narratives around critical issues like immigration enforcement and constitutional rights. Sources: Fox News Coverage KKOH Report on Lemon’s Comments

Only one in ten Somalis in the UK is employed

a pattern we must correct