President Donald Trump recently offered the vast federal workforce a buyout that would be hard to refuse, and many seem to be taking him up on the deal as the administration proves they are serious about downsizing. At the end of January, the Office of Personnel Management sent an email...

In 2007 New York City-based professor and economist William Easterly published his intentionally provocative book, White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. In it, he argued that after more than half a century of Western aid to the “third world,” there was no positive correlation between the amount of money given and a rise in a recipient nation’s GDP. This was followed by another book in 2014 by the same author called The Tyranny of Experts: Economists, Dictators, and the Forgotten Rights of the Poor. In this book, he carried his argument even further by pointing out that one of the main reasons that so many third-world countries were still “developing” is that Western experts have invented a field called “development economics.” This failed and failing branch of economics argues for command economies that ignore all the factors and reasons why OECD free-market countries and economies have succeeded. Instead, it predicates development assistance upon these failed models sold by overconfident “development economists,” who manage to ignore the amount of development assistance that has been stolen by third-world dictators and reinvested in the West. As “long ago” as 2002 the British newspaper, the Independent, reported that African leaders alone had stolen more than 140 billion dollars from their own people since independence in the 1960s. No doubt this trend has continued. And so we should not be surprised that President Donald Trump and his administration have frozen all projects and funds for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) whose annual budget is in the hundreds of millions of dollars provided by law-abiding tax-paying citizens. This is during a time of inflation and an extreme rise in the cost of living for American citizens whose institutions are barely functioning and whose border is as porous as a sponge. History of Western Foreign Aid Can Americans afford this largesse? Before I answer this question let me tell those readers who are not experts in this field a little bit of its history and social organization, as one cannot make a decision for or against international aid without first doing so. “Aid” or international development assistance is, or perhaps more aptly was, a function of the Cold War. After WWII, the United States leaned heavily on Britain, Belgium, Holland, and France to give their former colonies independence and membership in the United Nations. And so by the 1960s, the U.N. was filled with new countries from Africa and Asia. The Russians were eager to take advantage of this changing geopolitical bloc and as most of the new ruling elites of these newly independent countries leaned towards Marxism and command economies, it was an alliance made in heaven. The Americans had to respond so they airlifted thousands of young college students from Africa and Asia to U.S. institutions of higher learning to create their own sympathetic ruling elites. And then, they invented “the development project” — a soft power tool meant to prove to these elites that through Yankee expertise and the creation of representative institutions their native and newly independent countries could achieve “lift off” and a standard of living for its citizens that, if it not the same as that in America, was on the road to this goal. During the 1960s and until the fall of the Berlin Wall, this approach did not work as planned or was constantly “treading water” and so “new approaches” to development were invented by universities, think tanks, and government bureaucrats. Thousands of new projects were funded across the developing world and managed by a growing cadre of Western and American “development workers” who never managed to work themselves out of a job as “development” kept changing its spots every five years with new philosophies, economic models, programs, and projects. These people became a self-perpetuating bureaucratic class of lobbyists and “poverty alleviation” experts often supported by glitterati and pop stars (95 percent of them vote Democrat). This was enormously complicated by the many proxy wars fought in Africa and Asia between America and its allies and the Russians from the 1960s to the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1990. This is a tragic story in and of itself and an aggravating factor. During the second half of the 20th Century, a plethora of growing U.N. institutions were created that have and continue to attempt to put the U.N. extraterritorially “above” the efforts of specific countries (bilaterals, as they are called in the development jargon). These proliferating U.N. institutions hired more and more people from these new countries — especially from the growing Arab oil money-funded Islamic bloc. (READ MORE: Are the Protests in Slovakia Due to NGO and USAID Interference?) The salaries, benefits, privileges, and perks of U.N. workers are hard to fathom. They are way above USAID salaries and benefits, far beyond the private sector, and once “inside” the system it is almost impossible to get fired. Since the U.N. is largely funded by the U.S. and its NATO/OECD allies, you get a situation where well-paid, Marxist, third-world ideologues from the ruling elites of “developing” countries live the life of luxury at the U.N. while preaching egalitarianism and economic growth with, of course, the wrong theoretical models as provided by the “development economists” so well described in the book by Easterly. But U.N. types know this. It is no secret. I have met so many of them. Privately they are luxury-seeking cynics. And so many of them admit it. Yet so many of them, despite their inflated salaries and perks, still manage to steal vast sums from their employers within the U.N. system. These stories can be found all over the internet but are rarely covered in the mainstream media. Here is just one example reported by the Daily Caller in 2019: More than a dozen United Nations workers in Yemen are under investigation for allegedly embezzling millions of dollars of humanitarian aid in the war-torn nation, according to a Monday Associated Press report. Most U.N. bureaucrats just want to retire in Paris, New York, or the south of France. They want to join the transnational elites and live lives of conspicuous consumption on their bloated pensions. The last thing they want is the creation of more successful countries like Singapore. That would spoil their party and make them unemployed in short order. Also, because of the dominance of the Islamic bloc, these apparatchiks would rather turn the U.N. into an Israel-bashing machine or at least watch passively from the sidelines. This is wonderful and rational job protection from their narrow and selfish perspective. The Current Crisis With USAID The United States today has sent a strong message to its own “fellow travelers” within USAID, the left-leaning U.S. NGO world (so much of which is funded by USAID), and to the U.N. that it will no longer fund corrupt “developing” countries or so-called multilateral institutions like the U.N., facilitated by an endless round of American funded “ soft power” interventions. (READ MORE: Foreign Aid Reform: USAID Has a History of Funding Terrorists and Anti-American Organizations) If the United States wants to create a new program of famine relief, refugee relief, and intellectual and scientific cooperation with “developing” countries then it must go back to the drawing board and reject the Marxism of the NGOs and the command economy models of “development economists.” USAID has had the chance but has chosen not to do this. (LISTEN FOR MORE: The Spectacle Ep. 188: Why America Needs to Defund USAID) And so a first step would be to repatriate the stolen aid taken by third-world dictators and invest it in the West — put it into an “international development fund” run by the U.S. and distributed to countries whose governments do not endorse terror and respect the rights of their own citizens. I am all for humanitarian spending and development when the host country can afford it. And if the recipients use it wisely and the receiving government is not mile high in corruption. But none of that has been the case for the last 20 years. I once met a Dane who was closing down a failing development project in Kenya. I asked if it could not be reformed as the intention behind the project was noble. He looked at me with disbelief and said, “No failed project, program, or institution can be successfully reformed. Look at the U.N.! It must be terminated.” This came from a left-leaning Dane who had worked in Africa. That day I learnt an important lesson from him. READ MORE from Geoffrey Clarfield: The Wisdom of Sir Moses Montefiore Much To Know about the Roman Coliseum An American Return to the Polis The post Trump Should Shutter USAID — Development Economics Is a Hotbed for Corruption appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

Ya can’t make it up. The other day Democrats rallied at an outdoor rally outside the Treasury Department where they spent their time complaining about Trump appointee Elon Musk. The Wall Street Journal reported this: Democrats are focusing their fire on billionaire Elon Musk — not President Trump — as they push back against the administration’s lightning-fast moves to dismantle parts of the government and dig into sensitive federal data. “In the building behind me, Elon Musk is seizing power from the American people. We are here to fight back,” said Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.), at a large rally Tuesday at the Treasury Department headquarters. Musk “wants the power to decide whether or not every road repair in America goes forward, whether or not every Head Start center in America opens and whether or not every military base anywhere in the world operates according to Elon,” she said. She added: “No one elected Elon Musk to nothing.” Then there was this: “‘Not one Democrat in America voted for Elon Musk,’ adding that not one Republican or Libertarian had voted for him either.” Congresswoman Maxine Waters chimed in: “‘We have got to tell Elon Musk: Nobody elected your ass,’ Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters of California told a raucous crowd assembled on 14th Street outside the Treasury building on Tuesday night.” And on went the ravings of a similar nature. So: Stop. Full stop with this deliberate — hypocritical — dishonesty. The fact of the matter is that Donald Trump was elected. Big time. And the president of the United States gets to appoint his staff, which essentially is what Musk has become. Newsflash? Elizabeth Warren and Maxine Waters and all those other complaining Democrats do — wait for it — exactly the same thing. How, you ask? Every single elected Member of the Senate and House — the Congress — has the right to do exactly what the elected president does: Appoint their own decidedly unelected staff. And give them power. Having worked for a congressman, a senator, and a president I can say with certainty they all have two things in common. First: They are all elected by the American people, whether in a congressional district (congressmen), a state (senators), or nationally state-by-state (a president). Second: To a person, all senators and members of the House have working for them unelected staff members. Say again, unelected staff members. Every last one of them. In short, deliberately not stating the obvious to mislead unaware Americans, Elizabeth Warren has an entire staff of her own unelected Elon Musks. They have various titles such as administrative assistant, chief of staff, legislative director, committee staff or press secretary. And in that capacity, they do some version of what Elon Musk does for the elected President Trump — wield power. And unlike Elon Musk, it is a safe bet that they are unknown to the vast majority of their elected boss’s constituents. How many people in Massachusetts — outside a tight circle that deals with him or her — know who is Warren’s chief of staff? Legislative director? Committee staffer? Or knows his or her name? Answer? Doubtless zero. Warren’s multitudes of unelected staff members wielding power — as is true with all 100 senators and 435 House members — are utterly unknown to her constituents. But as that decidedly dishonest Warren presser silently illustrated, just like elected President Trump’s unelected Elon Musk, so too does Warren herself have powerful, unelected, and — unlike Musk, unknown to the public — staff members. This is to say, the presser of outraged Democrats including Warren and Waters was thoroughly dishonest. Hypocritical to the max. They themselves have whole staffs of unelected Elon Musks. Wielding power. Ya can’t make it up. READ MORE from Jeffrey Lord: Three Cheers for Kash Patel Jim Acosta and the Tyranny of the Liberal Media RFK Jr: Like Father, Like Son The post Elizabeth Warren and Democrats’ Hypocrisy appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

⚠️ Order your shirts here: https://www.markdice.com ? Order my new book from Amazon here: https://amzn.to/40vEC9U ⚡️ Join my exclusive Locals community here: https://markdice.locals.com/support ? Sponsor me through Patreon here: https://Patreon.com/MarkDice Order my book "Hollywood Propaganda: How TV, Movies, and Music Shape Our Culture" from Amazon: https://amzn.to/30xPFl5 or download the e-book from Kindle, iBooks, Google Play, or Nook. ? Order my book, "The True Story of Fake News" ➡️ https://amzn.to/2Zb1Vps ? Order my book "The Liberal Media Industrial Complex" here: https://amzn.to/2X5oGKx Mark Dice is an independent media analyst and bestselling author of "Hollywood Propaganda: How TV, Movies, and Music Shape Our Culture.” He has a bachelor's degree in Communication from California State University and was the first conservative YouTuber to reach 1 million subscribers (in 2017). He has been featured on Fox News, Newsmax, the History Channel, E! Entertainment, the Drudge Report, and news outlets around the world. This video description and the pinned comment contains Amazon and/or other affiliate links, which means if you click them and purchase the product(s), Mark will receive a small commission. Copyright © 2025 by Mark Dice. All Rights Reserved.