ARTICLE https://eko.substack.com/p/override ITEHIL LINK: 20% off discount code: PN20 and your affiliate link: https://itehil.com/products/itehil-self-pumping-outdoor-water-filter?ref=feegwxyd&variant=42420407763112 MEMBERSHIP: Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdnplvvQqMShs9UUNaLel3A/join Join Me Here As A Member here on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdnplvvQqMShs9UUNaLel3A?sub_confirmation=1 ————————————————— TOPICS: economy, collapse, recession, prices, inflation, middle class, decline, ISRAEL, war, Palestine, Gaza, hostages ————————————————— The Modern Prepper book: https://www.amazon.com/Modern-Prepper-J-H-Zarate/dp/1617045535/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=1RDPD3FGY4OWP&keywords=the+modern+prepper&qid=1689569407&s=books&sprefix=the+modern+prepper%2Caps%2C120&sr=1-1 https://m.youtube.com/sponsor_channel/UCBcyBXNCsbx8clN2KSqZlaw?noapp=1 Thank you for supporting me! TRANSCRIPT ON SUBSTACK http://www.preppernow.substack.com https://www.buymeacoffee.com/Preppernow1 JOIN ME ON LOCALS FOR $3 A MONTH https://preppernow.locals.com JOIN ME ON SUBSCRIBESTAR FOR $3 A MONTH https://www.subscribestar.com/preppernow (TIPS/Donations) Cash App: cash.app/$PrepperNow ————————————————— SPONSORS: JASE MEDICAL JASE CASE! Follow The Link! https://www.jasemedical.com/?rfsn=6390154.fa795e4 PREPPER NERD OFFLINE ASSET SYSTEM This is my affiliate link: https://signup.prepper-nerd.com/referral/home/Wz1AWj2DlhRsMbko There are other links available at https://prepper-nerd.com/affiliate-asset-center/ OFFLINE version launch and $20 discount ends Wed 8/3/22 ————————————————— Learn canning with Voodoo Queen cindisevy@gmail.com ————————————————— TELEGRAM Channel https://t.me/crisisreport ————————————————— PrepperNow is an educator, prepper, father, husband and patriot. Working in academia, I have a B.A. in political science and an M.Ed. in education. I use the PrepperNow sites to posit my thoughts and post trustworthy material. www.preppernow.net ————————————————— L. I. N. K. S. ————————————————— (ODYSEE) https://odysee.com/@preppernow:61 ————————————————- (Truth Social): @preppernow ———————————————— (Twitter): https://www.Twitter.com/prepper_ now ———————————————— (GAB) https://gab.com/preppernow ————————————————— (RUMBLE) https://rumble.com/user/PrepperNow ————————————————— (MINDS) https://minds.com/preppernow ————————————————— (CRISIS REPORT ON ODYSEE): https://odysee.com/@preparednessnow:9 ————————————————— (CRISIS REPORT) https://YouTube.com/@CrisisReport ————————————————— (EMAIL/INTEL) preppernow@protonmail.com ———————————————— (PREPPERNOW YT) https://youtube.com/channel/preppernow ————————————————— (Legal) FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copywright. #pantry #prepper #shortage

#preparedness #survival #selfreliance #collapse #shtf #teotwawki Links to the Patreon channel: https://www.patreon.com/integrativepreparedness Order My Books or T-Shirts Through the Stonemont Website: https://www.stonemont.us Links to my books on Amazon https://www.amazon.com/Steven-C.-Smith/e/B076G2J5NG%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share Stonemont channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYZhO7pBb12UQkhqfaCdHtw American Reversion Channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YR80GXOrQgU Stonemont Church Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@stonemontchurch1761 DoomTube: https://www.youtube.com/@Doomtube111

Roughly 4.6 billion years ago, the Sun was born from the gas and dust of a nebula that underwent gravitational collapse. The remaining gas and dust settled into a protoplanetary disk that slowly accreted to form the planets, including Earth. About 4.5 billion years ago, our planet was impacted by a Mars-sized body (Theia), which led to the formation of the Moon. According to current theories, water was introduced to Earth and the inner planets by asteroids and comets that permeated the early Solar System. The timing of this event is of major importance since the introduction of water was key to the origin of life on Earth. Exactly when this event occurred has been a mystery for some time, but astronomers generally thought it had arrived early during Earth’s formation. According to a recent study by a team led by scientists from the University of Rutgers-New Brunswick, water may have arrived near “late accretion” – the final stages of Earth’s formation. These findings could seriously affect our understanding of when life first emerged on Earth. The team was led by Katherine Bermingham, an associate professor in the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences at Rutgers-New Brunswick and the University of Maryland. She was joined by researchers from Clemson University, the Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences (CSsFK), the Department of Lithospheric Research, the Centre for Planetary Habitability (PHAB), and the Institute for Earth Sciences. Their findings are described in a paper, “The non-carbonaceous nature of Earth’s late-stage accretion,” in Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. Artist’s impression of the giant impact that shaped the Earth and created the Moon. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech. According to what scientists have learned from life on Earth, three ingredients are essential to putting the process in motion. These are water, energy, and the basic building blocks of organic chemicals – carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and sulfur – collectively called CHNOPS. As a cosmogeochemist, Bermingham and her associates are dedicated to the study of the chemical composition of matter in the Solar System. This largely consists of analyzing Earth rocks and materials deposited by meteorites and other extraterrestrial sources. In so doing, they hope to learn more about the origin and evolution of the Solar System and its rocky planets. A major aspect of this is knowing when and where the basic ingredients for life originated and how they found their way to Earth. For their study, Birmingham and her team examined meteorites obtained from the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History that belong to the “NC” group. These meteorites’ composition suggests they formed in the inner Solar System, where conditions were drier. This sets them apart from the “CC” group, which likely formed in the outer Solar System, where water and other volatiles were more abundant. The team extracted isotopes of molybdenum from these meteorites – a trace mineral essential for human health – and analyzed them using ionization spectrometry and a new analytical method they developed. This element is thought to have been deposited on Earth at about the same time the Moon formed, which was thought to have deposited a significant amount of the Earth’s water. As Birmingham explained in a Rutgers University press release: “When water was delivered to the planet is a major unanswered question in planetary science. If we know the answer, we can better constrain when and how life developed. The molybdenum isotopic composition of Earth rocks provides us with a special window into events occurring around the time of Earth’s final core formation, when the last 10% to 20% of material was being assembled by the planet. This period is thought to coincide with the Moon’s formation.” A piece of iron meteorite Campo del Cielo, one of the samples measured in the study. Credit: Katherine Bermingham They then compared the composition of these meteors’ isotopes to Earth rocks obtained by field geologists from Greenland, South Africa, Canada, the United States, and Japan. Their analysis showed that the Earth rocks were more similar to meteorites originating in the inner Solar System (NC). As Birmingham said: “Once we gathered the different samples and measured their isotopic. compositions, we compared the meteorites signatures with the rock signatures to see if there was a similarity or a difference. And from there, we drew inferences. We have to figure out from where in our solar system Earth’s building blocks – the dust and the gas – came and around when that happened. That’s the information needed to understand when the stage was set for life to begin.” The finding is significant since it indicates that Earth did not receive as much water from the Moon-forming impact as previously theorized. Instead, the data supports the competing school of thought that water was delivered to Earth in smaller portions late in its formation history and after the Moon was formed. “Our results suggest that the Moon-forming event was not a major supplier of water, unlike what has been thought previously,” said Bermingham. “These findings, however, permit a small amount of water to be added after final core formation, during what is called late accretion.” Further Reading: Rutgers University, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta The post Water Arrived in the Final Stages of Earth's Formation appeared first on Universe Today.

When Donald Trump secured his second term as president, several wealthy liberals threatened to leave the country. Most were bluffing. Ellen DeGeneres wasn’t. Once the queen of daytime television, Ellen packed her bags and moved to the English countryside with her wife Portia De Rossi. Seeking refuge from the political climate, the couple soon discovered that the grass isn’t always greener. Sometimes, it’s entirely scorched. Their £15 million ($18 million) Cotswolds estate has sparked outrage among locals, with accusations that renovations are creating a flood risk and disturbing ancient Roman ruins. It’s an ironic twist — fleeing the hostility of America, only to face a different kind of hostility abroad. Unless you live under a rock on a distant planet, you probably recognize that Britain has many problems, perhaps more than the U.S. Additionally, there is resentment toward Hollywood elites who want to cosplay as country squires. Ellen and Portia’s miscalculation is a fitting example of a rising trend: disillusioned Americans, especially the wealthy, looking across the Atlantic for a better life. With its old-world charm and perceived civility, Europe seems like a paradise compared to America. But appearances can be misleading. Americans have an outdated view of Europe. The continent they imagine is a laughable construct—an idyllic place where people sip coffee in pristine plazas, read philosophy in grand libraries, and enjoy universal healthcare without a second thought. In reality, Europe is in dire straits. I say this as a once-proud European. Societies are crumbling. Crime rates are soaring. Europe is disintegrating. And when I say Europe, I don’t just mean the usual suspects — the U.K., France, and Germany, all facing their own challenges. The rot runs deeper. Take Sweden, for instance. Once celebrated as a progressive utopia, Sweden now faces an average of more than one bombing each day. Yes, bombings. Streets that once symbolized Nordic serenity now echo with screams and sirens, as gang violence spirals beyond the government’s control. Entire neighborhoods have been effectively abandoned, transformed into no-go zones where criminals rule and families fear stepping outside after dark. From Stockholm to Södertälje, Sweden’s streets are now battlegrounds. Imported gangs exploit lax laws and a generous welfare state, recruit online, extort businesses, and settle scores with explosives. Shootouts have become routine. In fact, the situation is so dire that the government, grasping for control, is now considering lowering the criminal age to 14 — a desperate and humbling admission of failure. Sweden’s decay highlights the cost of unchecked immigration — reckless policies that opened the gates without any integration plan. And it’s not just Sweden. Even in Austria’s capital of Vienna — a city once synonymous with art, culture, and elegance — violence reigns supreme. Stabbings and sexual assaults have surged to such an extent that armed military personnel now patrol the streets — a scene once unimaginable in the heart of Europe. The city’s charming cafés and historic opera houses now coexist with a rising wave of violent crime, much of it perpetrated by individuals not born in Austria. Beyond crime, the bureaucratic nightmares of living in Europe are enough to shatter any American’s dream. The red tape that frustrates Californians isn’t unique — it’s standard practice across the continent. Even the simplest tasks in Europe can feel like an endurance test. Something as routine as opening a bank account or securing a rental turns into a slow-motion nightmare, full of endless waiting and officials who seem to take pride in doing as little as possible. Often romanticized as a hub for creatives and free spirits, Berlin is one of the worst offenders. The city may celebrate rebellion and artistic chaos. However, when it comes to paperwork — even seemingly simple paperwork — it requires a near-religious devotion to rigid, outdated procedures. Even Kafka would struggle to make sense of it. Another common misconception is that Europe is much more affordable than the U.S. While this may have been true decades ago, many of the continent’s major cities today are just as expensive — if not more so. London, Copenhagen, and Geneva rank among the priciest places in the world, where even a modest apartment can drain a six-figure salary. The grass might look greener from a distance, but once you’re knee-deep in mud, reality hits fast — and hard. With a net worth of almost half a billion dollars, Ellen can afford to weather the storm. However, the average American seeking a better life abroad will likely face disappointment. Despite its many flaws, America isn’t necessarily the issue. There’s still so much to love — the scenery, the music, the food, the humor. Nowhere else quite matches its energy or sheer possibility. You can speak your mind, reinvent yourself, and chase something better. The real problem lies in the largely unfounded belief that life is better elsewhere. Many Americans believe Europe holds the answer. Take it from a European — it doesn’t. READ MORE: The Death Throes of Free Speech in the United Kingdom Climate ‘Changists’ Cashing In, European-Style Gains for Irish Conservatives May Be Too Little, Too Late The post What All Americans Can Learn from Ellen DeGeneres’s Disastrous Escape to Europe appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

In 2007 New York City-based professor and economist William Easterly published his intentionally provocative book, White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. In it, he argued that after more than half a century of Western aid to the “third world,” there was no positive correlation between the amount of money given and a rise in a recipient nation’s GDP. This was followed by another book in 2014 by the same author called The Tyranny of Experts: Economists, Dictators, and the Forgotten Rights of the Poor. In this book, he carried his argument even further by pointing out that one of the main reasons that so many third-world countries were still “developing” is that Western experts have invented a field called “development economics.” This failed and failing branch of economics argues for command economies that ignore all the factors and reasons why OECD free-market countries and economies have succeeded. Instead, it predicates development assistance upon these failed models sold by overconfident “development economists,” who manage to ignore the amount of development assistance that has been stolen by third-world dictators and reinvested in the West. As “long ago” as 2002 the British newspaper, the Independent, reported that African leaders alone had stolen more than 140 billion dollars from their own people since independence in the 1960s. No doubt this trend has continued. And so we should not be surprised that President Donald Trump and his administration have frozen all projects and funds for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) whose annual budget is in the hundreds of millions of dollars provided by law-abiding tax-paying citizens. This is during a time of inflation and an extreme rise in the cost of living for American citizens whose institutions are barely functioning and whose border is as porous as a sponge. History of Western Foreign Aid Can Americans afford this largesse? Before I answer this question let me tell those readers who are not experts in this field a little bit of its history and social organization, as one cannot make a decision for or against international aid without first doing so. “Aid” or international development assistance is, or perhaps more aptly was, a function of the Cold War. After WWII, the United States leaned heavily on Britain, Belgium, Holland, and France to give their former colonies independence and membership in the United Nations. And so by the 1960s, the U.N. was filled with new countries from Africa and Asia. The Russians were eager to take advantage of this changing geopolitical bloc and as most of the new ruling elites of these newly independent countries leaned towards Marxism and command economies, it was an alliance made in heaven. The Americans had to respond so they airlifted thousands of young college students from Africa and Asia to U.S. institutions of higher learning to create their own sympathetic ruling elites. And then, they invented “the development project” — a soft power tool meant to prove to these elites that through Yankee expertise and the creation of representative institutions their native and newly independent countries could achieve “lift off” and a standard of living for its citizens that, if it not the same as that in America, was on the road to this goal. During the 1960s and until the fall of the Berlin Wall, this approach did not work as planned or was constantly “treading water” and so “new approaches” to development were invented by universities, think tanks, and government bureaucrats. Thousands of new projects were funded across the developing world and managed by a growing cadre of Western and American “development workers” who never managed to work themselves out of a job as “development” kept changing its spots every five years with new philosophies, economic models, programs, and projects. These people became a self-perpetuating bureaucratic class of lobbyists and “poverty alleviation” experts often supported by glitterati and pop stars (95 percent of them vote Democrat). This was enormously complicated by the many proxy wars fought in Africa and Asia between America and its allies and the Russians from the 1960s to the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1990. This is a tragic story in and of itself and an aggravating factor. During the second half of the 20th Century, a plethora of growing U.N. institutions were created that have and continue to attempt to put the U.N. extraterritorially “above” the efforts of specific countries (bilaterals, as they are called in the development jargon). These proliferating U.N. institutions hired more and more people from these new countries — especially from the growing Arab oil money-funded Islamic bloc. (READ MORE: Are the Protests in Slovakia Due to NGO and USAID Interference?) The salaries, benefits, privileges, and perks of U.N. workers are hard to fathom. They are way above USAID salaries and benefits, far beyond the private sector, and once “inside” the system it is almost impossible to get fired. Since the U.N. is largely funded by the U.S. and its NATO/OECD allies, you get a situation where well-paid, Marxist, third-world ideologues from the ruling elites of “developing” countries live the life of luxury at the U.N. while preaching egalitarianism and economic growth with, of course, the wrong theoretical models as provided by the “development economists” so well described in the book by Easterly. But U.N. types know this. It is no secret. I have met so many of them. Privately they are luxury-seeking cynics. And so many of them admit it. Yet so many of them, despite their inflated salaries and perks, still manage to steal vast sums from their employers within the U.N. system. These stories can be found all over the internet but are rarely covered in the mainstream media. Here is just one example reported by the Daily Caller in 2019: More than a dozen United Nations workers in Yemen are under investigation for allegedly embezzling millions of dollars of humanitarian aid in the war-torn nation, according to a Monday Associated Press report. Most U.N. bureaucrats just want to retire in Paris, New York, or the south of France. They want to join the transnational elites and live lives of conspicuous consumption on their bloated pensions. The last thing they want is the creation of more successful countries like Singapore. That would spoil their party and make them unemployed in short order. Also, because of the dominance of the Islamic bloc, these apparatchiks would rather turn the U.N. into an Israel-bashing machine or at least watch passively from the sidelines. This is wonderful and rational job protection from their narrow and selfish perspective. The Current Crisis With USAID The United States today has sent a strong message to its own “fellow travelers” within USAID, the left-leaning U.S. NGO world (so much of which is funded by USAID), and to the U.N. that it will no longer fund corrupt “developing” countries or so-called multilateral institutions like the U.N., facilitated by an endless round of American funded “ soft power” interventions. (READ MORE: Foreign Aid Reform: USAID Has a History of Funding Terrorists and Anti-American Organizations) If the United States wants to create a new program of famine relief, refugee relief, and intellectual and scientific cooperation with “developing” countries then it must go back to the drawing board and reject the Marxism of the NGOs and the command economy models of “development economists.” USAID has had the chance but has chosen not to do this. (LISTEN FOR MORE: The Spectacle Ep. 188: Why America Needs to Defund USAID) And so a first step would be to repatriate the stolen aid taken by third-world dictators and invest it in the West — put it into an “international development fund” run by the U.S. and distributed to countries whose governments do not endorse terror and respect the rights of their own citizens. I am all for humanitarian spending and development when the host country can afford it. And if the recipients use it wisely and the receiving government is not mile high in corruption. But none of that has been the case for the last 20 years. I once met a Dane who was closing down a failing development project in Kenya. I asked if it could not be reformed as the intention behind the project was noble. He looked at me with disbelief and said, “No failed project, program, or institution can be successfully reformed. Look at the U.N.! It must be terminated.” This came from a left-leaning Dane who had worked in Africa. That day I learnt an important lesson from him. READ MORE from Geoffrey Clarfield: The Wisdom of Sir Moses Montefiore Much To Know about the Roman Coliseum An American Return to the Polis The post Trump Should Shutter USAID — Development Economics Is a Hotbed for Corruption appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

Days after shocking the world with his upset victory in the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump espoused his hope of negotiating the “ultimate deal” between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs to resolve the “war that never ends.” As Trump told the Wall Street Journal at the time: “As a deal maker, I’d like to do … the deal that can’t be made. And do it for humanity’s sake.” Over eight years later, back in the White House following a Democratic interregnum and with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at his side, Trump confirmed his interest in forging the “ultimate deal.” Crucially, however, Trump’s basic parameters of such a deal will not, to put it mildly, be those long favored by the bipartisan foreign policy establishment. Before getting into his latest proposal, let’s flashback to Trump’s first term. From 2017 to 2021, Trump governed as the most pro-Israel American president, by far, since the modern State of Israel was established in 1948. In January 2020, after already taking such measures as withdrawing the U.S. from former President Barack Obama’s Iran nuclear deal, moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, and recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, Trump — again standing at the White House with Netanyahu — unveiled his “Peace to Prosperity” plan to end the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Although imperfect, it was by far the most pro-Israel plan for resolving the conflict an American president had ever proposed. Because the “Peace to Prosperity” plan legitimized Israel applying its sovereignty over disputed areas of the Jordan Valley and Judea and Samaria (the “West Bank”), many of the Palestinians’ traditional Arab backers were piqued. In June 2020, the United Arab Emirates’ ambassador to the U.S., Yousef Al Otaiba, took the unprecedented step of publishing a Hebrew-language op-ed warning Israel not to go forward with asserting any additional sovereignty. Yet only two months later, in August 2020, the UAE became the first Arab country in two and a half decades to establish peace with Israel. Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan soon followed, joining the UAE in the Abraham Accords circle of peace. In one fell swoop, Trump and Netanyahu did more to achieve Israeli–Arab rapprochement than all previous American presidents and Israeli prime ministers combined. They debunked the failed consensus — the ruinous shibboleth pushed for decades by Washington’s professional “peace process” cartel that only further Israeli territorial concessions could yield peace. The “peace process-ers” pushed their “inside-out” approach: Create a new Palestinian state, then the Arab states will normalize ties with Israel. Trump and Netanyahu inverted the playbook, going for a novel “outside-in” approach. It worked like a charm. As both leaders recognized, the Hamas-overrun Gaza Strip has already been, ever since Israel’s 2005 unilateral withdrawal, a miniature “two-state solution” in action. And it has been an abject disaster. That brings us up to the present. Prior to this week, Trump had alluded to the idea that he wanted Egypt and Jordan — the latter of which quite literally was established as the “Palestinian” state under the terms of the European powers’ post-World War I settlement and the British Mandate for Palestine — to absorb the Arab population of Gaza. He has since doubled down. The idea of such a population transfer is unpopular in the Arab world, to put it mildly. But Trump has overcome such resistance before. Three consecutive presidents — Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama — failed to fulfill the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995, which mandated moving the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, by issuing “national security” waivers every six months. All were scared of the reaction in the proverbial “Arab street.” Trump didn’t care and did it anyway. The reaction, it turns out, was fairly muted. Suffice it to say Jordanian King Abdullah II’s trip to the White House on Tuesday will be interesting. But it turns out that population transfer to Jordan and Egypt is only the first half of what Trump has in mind. He shocked everyone around him — including, it seems, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles — when he casually but assertively stated that the United States intends to “take over” Gaza after Israel’s war against Hamas. The U.S. will “own” Gaza, Trump said, and make it a “Riviera of the Middle East.” If we are taking Trump literally and not just seriously, to alter Salena Zito’s popular 2016 quip, it seems part two of the plan (U.S. ownership of Gaza) is contingent on part one (population transfer of the Arabs there). (READ MORE: Profile in Courage: Trump’s Gaza Proposal) Or perhaps we should not take Trump literally. Perhaps this is, much like the “Peace to Prosperity” plan in 2020, a negotiating chip in a bigger plan — the much-desired entrance of Saudi Arabia into the Abraham Accords alliance, maybe. And there is certainly some early second-term data in favor of the “negotiating chip” theory: Trump’s recent deferral of 25 percent tariffs on both Canada and Mexico in response to those two countries’ leaders agreeing to send troops to their respective borders with the U.S., for instance. (RELATED: A Real Estate Developer’s Guide to the Middle East) It’s difficult to know exactly what Trump is thinking here. There are real reasons for skepticism — but there are also real reasons for hope. He’s done this before. Let’s be patient and watch the shibboleth-buster in action. He may very well surprise us yet again. READ MORE from Josh Hammer: Donald Trump Is Emphatically Correct About Birthright Citizenship The Cold Civil War Is Over. We Won. Has Trump 2.0 Learned From Trump 1.0? To find out more about Josh Hammer and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com. COPYRIGHT 2025 CREATORS.COM The post Trump’s Gaza Gambit and the Art of the Ultimate Deal appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

by Ken Silva, Headline USA: ‘At a production rate of just two responsive documents per month, it will take over 2,500 years for Plaintiff to receive these documents. That is outrageous…’ Last February, Utah attorney Jesse Trentadue sued the FBI for records about an undercover informant who helped fund the Oklahoma City bombing, as well as for records about […]

by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star: Something is going on with gold in recent weeks and days, and you may not have noticed with all the focus on the mid-air collision at Reagan National Airport, and to my rank amateur’s mind, not enough dots are being connected to interpret it. The bottom line is, […]