Jewish “Friends” star David Schwimmer called out the anti-Israel and anti-Semitic nature of the recent “pro-Palestinian” protests that have taken over parts of college campuses across the country‚ saying that especially in the face of open anti-Semitism‚ “silence is complicity.” Schwimmer has spoken out several times about the rising anti-Semitism — in America and worldwide — since the brutal and unprovoked terror attacks Hamas perpetrated against Israel on October 7 last year. This past week‚ he shared video of Jewish students who have faced verbal and even physical attacks from protesters on their college campuses. “Jewish students across America are experiencing the worst attacks on their rights‚ dignity and safety in my lifetime‚” Schwimmer began his caption. “While some of the protests are peaceful‚ the atmosphere is one of pervasive harassment‚ intimidation‚ segregation‚ hate speech‚ threats &; acts of real violence.” “If this were any other minority group the response would have been immediate outrage and action. And yet this antisemitism grows‚ spreading from middle school to high school to college campuses nationwide … Please show your support for your Jewish neighbors‚ friends and colleagues‚” he added. “Silence is complicity.”   View this post on Instagram   A post shared by David Schwimmer (@_schwim_) Schwimmer included comments and testimony from Columbia University student Eden Yadegar‚ who said that the anti-Jewish sentiment had been there long before the protests erupted. When asked during another interview to respond to the excuses being made by school administrations and officials — namely that any anti-Semitic attacks were outliers and the actions of “outside agitators‚” Yadegar fired back. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP “There are stages of grief‚ right‚ so like at first there’s sadness and then there’s these different coping stages‚” she said. “We are all LIVID to a degree that we have not been before because people are gaslighting us and telling us that our experiences are invalid and they are not real and that we’re misunderstanding them when we are the ones that have experienced these things.”   View this post on Instagram   A post shared by MANDANA DAYANI (@mandanadayani)

One of the biggest questions surrounding a potential second Trump presidency is how exactly it would differ from the first one. Normally presidents don’t have to address this question when they’re running for a second term‚ they can just promise more of the same. But for Trump‚ he’s obviously been out of office for a few years. He’s one of a handful of presidents in American history seeking a nonconsecutive term‚ and a lot’s changed since 2021. And‚ as even Trump’s most devoted supporters would admit‚ he wasn’t able to achieve all of his promises in his first four years in office. It stands to reason that accomplishing those goals the second time around might require something of a new approach. On Tuesday‚ we got one of the clearest signs yet that Donald Trump will indeed be taking a new approach concerning one of the biggest problems this country faces‚ which directly impacts more than 200 million Americans at every stage of their life — from schooling to the workplace to government assistance and healthcare. I’m talking about anti-whiteism. This is a word that’s more or less verboten even in conservative circles. Unlike‚ say‚ anti-Semitism‚ no one wants to talk about it. But in an interview with Time magazine this week‚ Trump confirmed that combating anti-white racism‚ by name‚ will be one of the key goals of his administration if he wins re-election. Trump was responding to a question about polls showing that most of his supporters believe‚ correctly‚ that anti-white racism is a much bigger problem in this country than anti-black racism: “Oh‚ I think that there is a lot to be said about that‚” Trump said. “If you look at the Biden administration‚ they’re sort of against anybody depending on certain views. They’re against Catholics. They’re against a lot of different people. They actually don’t even know what they’re against‚ but they’re against a lot. But no‚ I think there is a definite anti-white feeling in this country and that can’t be allowed either. .. If you look right now‚ there’s absolutely a bias against white and that’s a problem.” This shouldn’t have been a significant moment in the presidential race. It should’ve had all the significance of a candidate affirming that the sky is blue. Trump doesn’t even say that anti-white racism is more prevalent than any other type of racism — though it is‚ obviously. Instead‚ he just says that there is some amount of anti-white sentiment in the country and that is also a bad thing. There shouldn’t be anything even notable about that. But it was a surprising moment‚ even for Trump supporters. In his first term‚ Trump rarely if ever mentioned the concept of anti-whiteism so explicitly. I couldn’t find any evidence of it. But a couple of years ago‚ Trump pointed out that the Biden administration was giving preferential medical treatment to non-white Americans‚ and in the past several months‚ former Trump adviser Stephen Miller has been targeting anti-white institutions in this country with lawsuits. And now Trump himself is recognizing the broader problem with anti-whiteism in our culture. WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show You can tell this moment caught the Left by surprise because the mere acknowledgment that anti-whiteism exists was enough to reduce some commentators practically to tears. Here for example was the reaction from Whoopi Goldberg: The View is the most antiwhite show on TV. Here‚ Whoopi Goldberg feigns outrage at Trump's remarks about the antiwhite feeling in America‚ but she knows it's true – she makes her money from it. She also knows that lynchings were done to criminals‚ including white people. pic.twitter.com/TThYXTc1F9 — Way of the World (@wayotworld) May 1‚ 2024 “Nobody in your family was hung‚” Whoopi Goldberg barks at Donald Trump. That’s one of the few cases where the difference between the words “hanged” and “hung” is actually pretty important‚ unless Whoopi Goldberg has some kind of intimate knowledge of Trump’s family that I’m not aware of. She also claims Donald Trump is “anti-humanist‚” which makes it clear she doesn’t know what humanism is. From context‚ though‚ it seems like Whoopi is saying that because no one in Donald Trump’s family was lynched‚ therefore anti-whiteism can’t possibly exist today. Or maybe she’s also implying that white people in general were never lynched‚ and then she’s using that false premise to somehow conclude that anti-whiteism can’t possibly exist today. Whatever interpretation you choose‚ it doesn’t work. The largest mass lynching in this country involved Italians‚ who Whoopi would presumably classify as white. Regardless‚ white people were not immune from lynchings. In fact‚ according to a document on the University of Missouri–Kansas City School of Law’s website‚ tracking lynchings by race from the years 1882 – 1968‚ there were 1297 lynchings of white people. While that’s fewer than the 3‚445 black lynchings‚ the point is that you certainly can’t assume that any white person alive today doesn’t have a lynching victim in their ancestral history. Even if you pretend that lynching has only ever involved black people‚ it still doesn’t remotely address the fact that anti-whiteism is a much bigger problem right now than anti-black racism. Her entire argument is a non sequitur. But it’s notable that Whoopi Goldberg was so fired up about this. And indeed‚ many Democrats are. Earlier this month‚ Congressman Cedric Richmond‚ a co-chair of Biden’s campaign‚ warned that Trump is‚ quote‚ “making it clear that if he wins in November‚ he’ll turn his racist record into official government policy‚ gutting programs that give communities of color economic opportunities and making the lives of Black and brown folks harder.” Richmond made those comments in response to an Axios report last month‚ entitled‚ “Trump allies plot anti-racism protections — for white people.” Specifically‚ a new Trump administration would shut down various programs designed to benefit only certain demographic groups. That includes programs like the $29 billion pandemic-era program that would have awarded money only to “women and minority-owned restaurants.” (Stephen Miller’s group‚ America First Legal‚ successfully sued to stop that). But there are many more programs like that‚ which a Trump DOJ could also shut down. That includes the NFL’s Rooney Rule‚ which mandates interviews with “minority” coaches‚ for example. Presumably‚ a second Trump administration would also end the absurd lawsuit against Sheetz for daring to use criminal background checks‚ which alleges that any employer using background checks is automatically racist. This potential return to a race-blind government that respects the Constitution greatly infuriated a woman named Jasmine Harris‚ who directs “Black media” for the Biden-Harris campaign. (Yes‚ they apparently have a segregated media department at the Biden campaign that only deals with black people.) Here’s what she said: This [Axios] report‚ in addition to all of the recent examples of shameless racism by Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans‚ serves as a warning to Black America: Donald Trump is a selfish and vindictive man who doesn’t give a damn about Black people. .. He will make our lives worse by using the very laws that the pioneers of the Civil Rights Movement fought for‚ against us. There’s actually an interesting admission buried in that quote. The Biden black media director isn’t alleging that Donald Trump is going to do anything illegal. Instead‚ she’s complaining that he’s going to enforce existing civil rights laws‚ which were supposedly intended to ensure racial equality. This is a totally foreign concept to the Biden campaign. They’re essentially admitting that they’re discriminating against whites in violation of civil rights laws — but they’re saying those laws just shouldn’t be enforced to protect white people‚ who they see as second-class citizens. Yesterday afternoon‚ we saw yet another sign of this attitude. The Biden campaign’s official rapid response page tweeted this clip of Donald Trump‚ apparently in an effort to make him look bad. But it was actually more of an advertisement for his campaign. Watch: Trump: Look at Paris. Look at London. They're no longer recognizable. I'm going to get myself into a lot of trouble‚ but you know what&;#63; That's the fact‚ they are no longer recognizable. We can't let that happen here pic.twitter.com/sRr6pdU2rb — Biden-Harris HQ (@BidenHQ) May 1‚ 2024 The Biden campaign didn’t even comment on this video. They just posted it‚ quoting every word Trump said. That’s because they know everything Trump said is true. Pretty much all of the population growth in the U.K. going forward is going to be driven by migration. That’s been the case for the last several years‚ too. The unstated result is that fewer white people will live in the U.K.‚ which the Biden administration assumes you’ll think is a good thing. That’s because‚ in their view‚ it’s not racist to deliberately diminish white populations. It’s also not racist to violate the civil rights of white people. In fact‚ they don’t believe it’s possible to be racist against whites in the first place. This is an idea that originated in the bowels of Left-wing academia and Critical Race Theory‚ and it’s since metastasized to politics. Here’s how one professor in the U.K. named Pragya Agarwal puts it. See if you can spot the massive flaw in this reasoning: White people can indeed face stereotypical assumptions based on their skin color and hence encounter racial prejudice. But this cannot be called racism‚ because of the inherent systemic imbalance of power between those with lighter skin color and people of color. Racial prejudice can affect people on an individual level‚ but it would not have the same effect on a larger social and cultural level because it is only when stereotypes are bolstered by power … that it creates systemic and structural racism. In other words‚ she’s saying white people can’t be victims of racism because racism involves “power” and “systemic imbalance‚” and white people have all the power. It takes about two seconds to realize that‚ even on its own terms‚ this argument makes precisely no sense whatsoever. The Fortune 500 companies that award preferential treatment to non-white applicants have far more “power” than their white applicants do. So do the universities that award black applicants a 500-point boost on their SAT scores‚ and the federal government agencies that award financial assistance to various demographic groups on the basis of race. In all of these cases‚ there is prejudice backed by “power” — extraordinary power‚ actually. But there’s really no point in engaging with Critical Race Theory on the merits‚ though‚ because it’s not actually meant to convince anyone of anything. It’s intended to be a thin‚ allegedly scholarly veneer that justifies overt discrimination against millions of Americans. The appropriate response to this kind of thinking is not to treat it with any kind of legitimacy. It’s to call it what it is: anti-white racism‚ or anti-whiteism. That’s what Donald Trump has just done. It’s what every Republican should be doing right now. Talking about anti-whiteism infuriates Democrats because it’s been an unstated core part of their policy agenda for several years. And now‚ for the first time since Biden took office‚ it looks like it could very soon come to an end.

Two Hollywood celebrities just voiced their opposite views on the best time to have children. Both “Modern Family” star Sofia Vergara and “Hitch” actress Eva Mendes discussed their thoughts on motherhood as part of the People Magazine’s “Beautiful” issue. Vergara said having kids later in life wouldn’t be “fair‚” while Mendes insisted it was “asinine” to suggest she should have had kids in her twenties. Vergara‚ 51‚ recently made headlines when she divorced her husband of seven years‚ fellow celebrity Joe Manganiello. The “Modern Family” star revealed that him wanting kids was one of the biggest reasons the marriage fell apart. The actress had a son when she was 19‚ and she said that having more kids now wouldn’t work for her.  “There’s things in life that might sound like good ideas‚ but they’re not‚” she told the outlet of having another child over 50. “I was a mother already. I know what it means to be a good mother or to try to be the best mother that you can‚ and that takes a lot of sacrifices‚ takes a lot of energy.” “Nowadays‚ thanks to science‚ women can actually have babies older‚” she added. “Before‚ nature for some reason tells your body at 50 you are in menopause‚ it’s time for you to be done with that. There is a reason why nature is doing that.” Vergara went on to say that while she can “totally respect where anyone wants to be a mom after 50‚” that was not what she wanted. “I didn’t think because of my career‚ the way I live my life‚ the way my marriage was‚ that it was fair to bring a kid to this world‚ and I’m not going to be able to give 100 percent‚” she told People.  Mendes‚ meanwhile‚ is reportedly married to actor Ryan Gosling and didn’t have her first child until she was 40. “When I was 40‚ it was a big deal for people when I was pregnant‚ and it wasn’t for me. And then I was 42 and I was pregnant with my second one and people were like‚ ‘Oh my God‚ you’re going to be so tired. That’s why people have kids in their 20s.’ I was like‚ that’s the most sorry‚ asinine thing I’ve ever heard‚” the actress told People.  Mendes went on‚ saying‚ “It takes more patience. In my 20s‚ I shouldn’t have even been around a child. I was just foul-mouthed and smoking. I could not have raised kids in any other era of my life but now‚ for sure.”

Yahya Sinwar‚ the Hamas terrorist leader who was the mastermind behind the brutal October 7 attack on Israel‚ is hiding behind at least 15 hostages‚ according to American and Israeli officials‚ The New York Times reported. As the U.S.‚ Israel‚ and Egypt push Hamas to release the remaining hostages — which include as many as six Americans — Sinwar is negotiating behind a human shield made up of the very people Israeli forces are trying to rescue‚ officials said. The Times cited “people briefed on the negotiations” between Hamas and Israel who have blamed Sinwar for preventing a deal from being made that would release the hostages. The outlet added that Sinwar is negotiating “from his hiding space deep in the tunnels below Gaza‚” adding that his human shield of hostages “prevent[s] Israel from assassinating him.” Former U.S. Army Vice Chief of Staff General Jack Keane also told Sky News that Sinwar could have as many as 20 hostages surrounding him and his family. “My sources tell me that Sinwar‚ who is the number one leader in Gaza of the Hamas organization‚ has 15-20 hostages protecting him and his family‚” Keane said. U.S. officials made similar comments‚ in concurrence with Israeli intelligence‚ about Sinwar using hostages as human shields in February. Hamas terrorists kidnapped hundreds of civilians and soldiers from Israel during its October 7 attack. Israeli and U.S. officials said last month that it’s unclear how many hostages remain alive in Gaza. Sinwar’s brutality has been evident over the course of Hamas’ war with Israel as he said in November that the October 7 attack on Israel that killed 1‚200 people “was just a rehearsal.” Hamas terrorists have also said after being captured that the leaders of the terrorist organization‚ including Sinwar‚ hide under hospitals in Gaza. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Terrorist leaders have hidden behind non-combatants in the past‚ with one of the most recent examples dating back to 2011‚ when Al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden attempted to use women as human shields during the U.S. raid on his compound in Pakistan before he was killed by special forces‚ according to the White House. Officials added that one of the women Bin Laden was hiding behind was also killed.

Georgia’s Republican Governor Brian Kemp signed a law that will require jails to check the immigration status of inmates and collaborate with federal immigration officials. The law‚ HB1105‚ would threaten to strip funding from sheriff’s offices that refuse to work with federal immigration officials when they have individuals in their custody who appear to be in the country illegally. Kemp said that the legislation “became one of our top priorities following the senseless death of Laken Riley at the hands of someone in this country illegally who had already been arrested even after crossing the border.” “If you enter our country illegally and proceed to commit further crime in our communities‚ we will not allow your crimes to go unanswered‚” the Republican Governor went on to add. An illegal immigrant from Venezuela named Jose Ibarra was charged in the murder of 22 year-old Laken Riley after she was found dead in a wooded area near the University of Georgia in Athens. An autopsy found that Riley had died as a result of blunt force trauma to the head‚ with the investigation also finding that Ibarra had dragged her body to a secluded location in an attempt to conceal his alleged crime. Ibarra’s charges included malice murder‚ felony murder‚ aggravated assault‚ kidnapping‚ hindering a 911 call‚ and concealing the death of another. Ibarra had previously been arrested in New York in 2022 and was charged with acting in a manner to injure a child younger than 17. The new Georgia law comes amid an unprecedented crisis on the southern border‚ with immigration officials recording over 9.5 million nationwide encounters and 1.7 million estimated illegal immigrant gotaways since Joe Biden took office. There were only 445‚000 total reported gotaways for 2018‚ 2019‚ and 2020 under the Trump administration. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Other Republican states like Texas have also taken action to crack down on illegal immigration amidst the crisis. A number of recent public opinion surveys have found that Americans are broadly critical of Biden’s handling of the border‚ with residents in blue states like Colorado and Massachusetts naming immigration as the top issue facing their states. Another poll found that just 20 percent of voters across the country believe that the United States has control over its borders‚ while a separate survey revealed that only 36 percent of voters approve of Biden’s handling of the critical election year issue.