DailyWire+ documentary “Am I Racist?” has been snubbed from the Oscar shortlist, despite the film’s record-breaking box office success and massive cultural influence.  “Am I Racist?”, which features Daily Wire author and podcast host Matt Walsh exposing the DEI grift, outperformed any other documentary this year. Additionally, “Am I Racist?” is one of only 15 documentaries ever to open in over 1,500 theaters and earned the third-highest opening day gross for a documentary in the last decade. The shortlist is determined by Academy Documentary Branch members, who later decide the five Oscar nominees.  WATCH ‘AM I RACIST?’ ON DAILYWIRE+ “The Academy Awards announced the shortlist for documentaries,” Walsh posted to X on Tuesday. “These are their top 15 films in the genre that will be whittled down to 5 nominees. ‘Am I Racist?’ did not make the top 15 even though it is the highest grossing doc of the decade and easily the most talked about, most watched, and most influential documentary of this year.”  “This is the outcome I expected, of course, but it doesn’t make it any less of a farce,” he added.  The Academy Awards announced the shortlist for documentaries. These are their top 15 films in the genre that will be whittled down to 5 nominees. “Am I Racist?” did not make the top 15 even though it is the highest grossing doc of the decade and easily the most talked about, most… — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) December 17, 2024 Co-founder of The Daily Wire and “Am I Racist?” executive producer Jeremy Boreing, on the other hand, said the snub was shocking in light of the doc’s massive success.  “I have to say, I am genuinely surprised by this result,” he wrote. “I truly thought they would have to acknowledge AIR, if only to save face.” I have to say, I am genuinely surprised by this result. I truly thought they would have to acknowledge AIR, if only to save face. https://t.co/4AtXLlqRLW — Jeremy Boreing (@JeremyDBoreing) December 17, 2024 Walsh also highlighted the success of  “What is a Woman?”  – a Daily Wire documentary about gender that preceded “Am I Racist?” – and underscored how Hollywood believes they “own” filmmaking and resent the Right for their success.  “If a conservative can make a documentary that crushes every other film in its genre that year and beats every film in its genre in the past 6 or 7 years, and yet still not even crack the top 15, that means that conservatives are simply excluded from having their work recognized,” he wrote. “Again, this is not a surprise. But that’s what it means.”  “One thing I’ve learned after getting into filmmaking is that the Left truly believes it owns the art of filmmaking,” Walsh asserted. “Any conservative who makes a film is an intruder, a sinister usurper showing up in a place where he doesn’t belong.” “The truth is that the success of my films — and they are both easily the most watched and influential documentaries of the decade — actually makes it LESS likely that they’ll be recognized by critics or awards,” the conservative added. “Our success is an affront to them. They hate us for it.” “Deadline,” a prominent entertainment outlet, also deemed the omission of “Am I Racist?” from the Oscar shortlist a “snub,” noting that the film earned “more money at the box office than any other documentary this year, by far.” 

Alan Jones, a storied figure in Australian media and conservative politics, stands accused of historical sexual assault charges. These offenses, involving allegations of aggravated indecent assault and sexual touching, span nearly two decades. Facing 34 charges, Jones maintains his innocence, preparing for a significant legal showdown. His stance, set against the backdrop of his longstanding media influence, captures national attention. How will this high-profile case unfold when it reaches the courtroom? Legal Challenges and Charges Alan Jones, aged 83, is confronted with severe historical sexual assault charges, spanning from 2001 to 2019. These include aggravated indecent assault and sexually touching without consent involving ten alleged victims. Originally facing 24 counts, Jones now contends with 34 charges following additional allegations. The former host of a popular Sydney morning radio show from 2002 to 2020, his influence reaches beyond media, into rugby as a coach and political circles as a speechwriter. On November 18th, Jones was arrested at his Sydney apartment, where electronic devices were seized in a police operation. The gravity of these accusations has drawn heightened scrutiny, causing ripples across the conservative and broader Australian media landscapes. The alleged offenses implicate Jones in acts with individuals, some of whom are believed to have known him personally or been employed by him. Another layer of intrigue comes from the addition of charges just prior to his recent court appearance. Jones’s Defense and Public Statement Alan Jones has resolutely denied all charges, expressing confidence in the legal process. He labeled the allegations as baseless or distortions of the truth and has been vocal about his intention to fight these charges in a jury trial. His defense team, including lawyers Bryan Wrench and Chris Murphy, prepares for a rigorous courtroom defense. In public statements, Jones has retorted against media portrayals and the investigative approaches, highlighting his lack of opportunity to address allegations prior to arrest. Alan Jones charged with 24 indecent assault and sexual touching offences against eight victimshttps://t.co/NFynaJYM32 — amanda meade (@meadea) November 18, 2024 The legal proceedings are scheduled for March 11, 2024, setting the stage for a potentially protracted legal battle. His defense asserts that misleading media reports exacerbate the situation, yet Jones remains free on bail, pending the court’s next administrative hearing. Such circumstances haven’t stifled Jones, who voices his determination to defend every charge and affirm his innocence, underscoring the legal premise of being presumed innocent until proven otherwise. Public Attention and Future Court Developments The case against Alan Jones attracts substantial media and public interest due to his prominent standing. This scrutiny mirrors past controversies where his remarks have polarized audiences across Australia. Known for contentious statements about influential figures, the broadcaster’s current legal battle parallels his larger-than-life media persona. As the legal intricacies unfold, the public remains acutely aware of each development. Controversial broadcaster Alan Jones is facing 26 charges including act of indecency, indecent assault and sexual touching. #sydneycriminallawyers #indecency #indecentassault #sexualact #sexualtouching #AlanJoneshttps://t.co/ejz97WyVMU — SydneyCriminalLawyer (@sydcrimlawyers) November 20, 2024 Jones’s upcoming trial carries significant implications beyond his personal life, threatening the enduring legacy of a public figure who has shaped media discourse over decades. As his defense mounts, and the prosecution prepares its case, the implications of the trial could be far-reaching, setting a precedent in cases involving monumental public figures. The resolution of this legal saga will undoubtedly captivate audiences eager for justice and transparency. Sources: Former radio broadcaster and Australian rugby coach Alan Jones denies indecent assault charges Alan Jones – Australian radio host pleads not guilty to sex abuse Veteran broadcaster Alan Jones denies dozens of historical sexual assault allegations | The Independent The post Legal Trouble for Alan Jones: Historic Assault Charges Shake Australian Media Icon appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

'It might be TdA'

'The unknown driver did not stop to render aid and fled the scene'

'Silence the speech'

'The problem is that folks just aren’t buying it'

'You don't think Liz Cheney broke the law, do you?'

A viral image shared on X purports to show Kash Patel, President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), wearing a pair of Lucchese boots. Trump’s new FBI Director selling boots 2 years ago. pic.twitter.com/RUFIv6hYIF — Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) December 2, 2024 Verdict: False The claim is false, as the […]