President Trump has officially cut off all U.S. funding to Colombia in response to their drug trafficking….but I have just one question. I’ll get to my question in just a minute. First, here is the announcement: Trump cuts off all U.S. funding to Colombia in response to their drugs poisoning Americans He tells the Colombian president to “close up these killing fields immediately, or the United States will close them up for him, and it won’t be done nicely!” pic.twitter.com/A6bNpeO2xO — johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) October 19, 2025 FULL TEXT: Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump President Gustavo Petro, of Columbia, is an illegal drug leader strongly encouraging the massive production of drugs, in big and small fields, all over Columbia. It has become the biggest business in Columbia, by far, and Petro does nothing to stop it, despite large scale payments and subsidies from the USA that are nothing more than a long term rip off of America. AS OF TODAY, THESE PAYMENTS, OR ANY OTHER FORM OF PAYMENT, OR SUBSIDIES, WILL NO LONGER BE MADE TO COLUMBIA. The purpose of this drug production is the sale of massive amounts of product into the United States, causing death, destruction, and havoc. Petro, a low rated and very unpopular leader, with a fresh mouth toward America, better close up these killing fields immediately, or the United States will close them up for him, and it won’t be done nicely. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President Donald J. Trump Ok, so now my question…. That’s great and all and I fully support it, but can anyone tell me WHY IN THE HELL we are funding or subsidizing Colombia in the first place? I am so sick and tired of paying taxes through the nose and then hearing how we’re still broke and our national debt is going up by the trillions every year….and yet we’re funding/subsidizing fucking Colombia? Why? STOP IT! Stop it now! Not just because they are drug traffickers, but stop it because the USA needs to immediately get out of the business of funding any other country on Earth.  Period.  Full stop. Until our debt is gone and our federal income taxes are abolished, I don’t want one fucking dollar going to another country. Not Colombia. Not Ukraine. Not Israel. It all needs to stop. Now. Yesterday. We are broke folks, we no longer have any funds to send anywhere! What part of this is so hard to understand?

October 19, 2025

PRESIDENT TRUMP CONFIRMS HE WILL SEND NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS TO SAN FRANCISCO TO CRACK DOWN ON CRIME.

Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) claimed on Sunday that he would not call for a Republican to drop out of a political race if texts surfaced in which said Republican had advocated for the assassination of a political opponent. Kaine’s assertion – made to host Kristen Welker on NBC’s “Meet the Press” — comes against the backdrop of the scandal rocking the attorney general’s race in his home state. Democratic nominee Jay Jones, in texts sent three years earlier, had advocated violence against then state House Speaker Todd Gilbert and had even suggested that Gilbert would never change political positions unless he and his wife were forced to watch one of their young children die. The Virginia Senator has condemned the text messages, but has argued more than once that he knows Jones well — and that on balance, he will not withdraw his endorsement. WATCH: Tim Kaine is asked if a Republican sent the same texts that Jay Jones did, would he call on them to drop out of the race? Kaine: “Absolutely not.” The insane Democrat lies and spin to cover for this deranged lunatic continue. pic.twitter.com/p48mpSyWMU — Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) October 19, 2025 Welker pressed Kaine on the issue, saying that critics wondered whether he would call for a Republican to drop out of the race if the shoe were on the other foot. “Absolutely not,” Kaine declared. “It is — it’s directly equivalent to things that the Republican gubernatorial candidate has publicly said, not in private texts. ‘Murder is murder, and your time will come,’ she said that in a public meeting speaking about pro-choice activists. I’ve not called for her to drop out of the race.” “The voters began voting in Virginia on September 19th,” Kaine continued. “These are fair items for voters to consider as they cast their vote, but no, we’re not calling for Republicans to drop out of races, we say apologize, you have to take account for your actions, and voters can look at the actions and look at your sincerity if you apologize. Apologies are in short supply in politics these days.” Jones did offer an apology during his debate with Attorney General Jason Miyares (R-VA), but even Democrats were commenting at the time that it had fallen flat. “Oooof. This Jay Jones sounds totally robotic and his apology and counter-responses totally FLAT. Then he pivoted to conventional, obvious, and typical Democrat attack lines against any generic Republican. His apology lacked any EMOTION whatsoever and just pivoted to Trump. This is a disaster,” Michael LaRosa, who served as spokesman for former First Lady Jill Biden observed. Oooof. This Jay Jones sounds totally robotic and his apology and counter-responses totally FLAT. Then he pivoted to conventional, obvious, and typical Democrat attack lines against any generic Republican. His apology lacked any EMOTION whatsoever and just pivoted to Trump. This… — Michael LaRosa (@MichaelLaRosaDC) October 16, 2025 Kaine has also taken some criticism for his repeated claim that he’s known Jones “for 25 years,” in large part because Jones is 36 years old — which means that Kaine is saying that he’s known the Democratic candidate since he was just 11 years old. Jay Jones is 36 years old… So is Kaine saying he’s known him since he was 11? Anyone wanna follow up on this? https://t.co/upxez7awjF — Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) October 8, 2025 The other comments Kaine referenced, that were made by Republican gubernatorial candidate Winsome Sears, also came from three years earlier. Speaking about pro-choice activists, Sears was making the argument that abortion was murder and that those who supported it would have to look themselves in the mirror and acknowledge that — she was not calling fir anyone to be killed.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) still could not commit on Sunday to endorsing Zohran Mamdani, the self-proclaimed Democratic socialist who won his party’s nomination in the New York City Mayoral race. Jeffries, who’s been asked about endorsing Mamdani on a number of occasions, told ABC’s Jonathan Karl that he was looking forward to “continuing” conversations with Mamdani — and although he didn’t rule out an endorsement altogether, the fast-approaching general election is becoming more and more likely to pass before he does so. WATCH: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries tells @JonKarl that he has not endorsed Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic candidate in the New York City mayoral race, but says he is looking forward to “continuing” conversations. Read more: https://t.co/wHsSsY4AJk pic.twitter.com/hlxOyFmicq — This Week (@ThisWeekABC) October 19, 2025 “I want to also ask you, we’re getting closer to the New York mayor’s race,” Karl began. “You still haven’t endorsed Zohran Mamdani, have you?” “I have not,” Jeffries declared. “Why is that?” Karl wondered. “Well, as I’ve indicated, I expect to have a conversation with him at some point this week, in advance of early voting which begins next weekend in New York City,” Jeffries replied. “And I will certainly have more to say about the mayor’s race and about our Democratic nominee prior to early voting beginning. Karl continued to press, however, asking, “What is though that has held you back? I mean usually, this is someone that won a Democratic primary, you know, usually it wouldn’t be that much of a question whether or not a Congressman from the city of New York, the Democratic leader would endorse him. What’s giving you pause?” “Well, we’ve had very good conversations over the last few months in advance if the government shutting down,” Jeffries said, although he did not directly address Karl’s question. Instead he referred to those conversations as “forward-looking,” “community-based,” and focused on “efforts to make New York City more affordable.” He gave a similar answer when he was asked over the summer whether he’d throw his weight behind Mamdani, saying at the time that he wanted to have “a conversation” with the candidate first. “Our districts don’t overlap. I have never had a substantive conversation with him. And so that’s the next step in terms of this process to discuss his vision for moving the city forward and addressing the issues that are important to the communities that I represent,” he said, and called on Mamdani directly to “clarify” his position on Israel. “Globalizing the Intifada, by way of example, is not an acceptable phrasing,” Jeffries concluded. “He’s going to have to clarify his position on that as he moves forward. With respect to the Jewish communities that I represent, I think our nominee is going to have to convince folks that he is prepared to aggressively address the rise in antisemitism in the city of New York, which has been an unacceptable development.” Others have suggested that Jeffries, who represents a district that is 11% Jewish, has concerns about Mamdani’s support for BDS — “Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions” — against Israel or his claim that, as mayor, he would have Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrested if he came to New York City.

And we thought Chiefs Kingdom was collapsing

President Donald Trump said Sunday that the United States could purchase Argentinian beef in an attempt to bring down prices for American consumers. "We would buy some beef from Argentina," he told reporters...