YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #police #law #racism #civilrights #ai #funny #fourthamendment #utah #cops #privacy #lawenforcement #warrant #environmentalscience #eff #block
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

YubNub News
YubNub News
1 y

Federal Reserve March Policy Meeting—Key Takeaways
Favicon 
yubnub.news

Federal Reserve March Policy Meeting—Key Takeaways

Tariffs, inflation, and recession were the central themes of the March policy meeting.The Federal Reserve concluded its two-day policy meeting on March 19, leaving interest rates unchanged for the second…
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
1 y

Morning Greatness: Trump to Sign Executive Order to Abolish Department of Education
Favicon 
yubnub.news

Morning Greatness: Trump to Sign Executive Order to Abolish Department of Education

Good Thursday morning. Here is what’s on President Trump’s agenda today: 3:30 PM THE PRESIDENT signs Executive Orders 4:00 PM THE PRESIDENT participates in an Education Event and signs an Executive…
Like
Comment
Share
The Patriot Post Feed
The Patriot Post Feed
1 y

Championing School Choice for Children in Tennessee
Favicon 
patriotpost.us

Championing School Choice for Children in Tennessee

As a father, I refuse to sit back while our kids continue to fall through the cracks.
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

FNQ floods - Man opens front gate which releases heaps of water ? and FISH ?!!
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

FNQ floods - Man opens front gate which releases heaps of water ? and FISH ?!!

????️?? In FNQ (Far North Queensland, Australia) it’s flooding again...kind of normal weather or the tropics.... Video shows man opening the front driveway gate of his front garden for a visitor which releases the floodwaters and lots of fish!! I would have brought my net for any big ones ? ?
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

The Gaza ceasefire is collapsing
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

The Gaza ceasefire is collapsing

by Alex Christoforou, The Duran: The countdown for the sustainability of the ceasefire in the Gaza Strip begun after the inflammatory statements of ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians by Trump and Netanyahu regarding their intention and agreement to “move”, i.e. displace, the Palestinian residents of the Gaza Strip from Israel and the American involvement in […]
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

Anubis: The Secrets of the Egyptian God of the Underworld
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

Anubis: The Secrets of the Egyptian God of the Underworld

  Like most Egyptian deities, Anubis was a complex god with varied associations and whose importance and domains evolved and changed from early dynastic to Greco-Roman times. Anubis was the original Egyptian god of the dead and one of the oldest known deities, but later relinquished his position to Osiris and became a god more closely associated with mummification. He is now best known for his role in the Osiris myth and importance in the funerary rituals that ensured that life continued after death for the ancient Egyptians.   Origins of the Cult of Anubis Funeral box featuring Horus and Anubis, Ptolemaic Egypt, c. 332-30 BCE. Source: Louvre Museum.   Anubis was one of the oldest known ancient Egyptian gods. He can be traced back to the Predynastic period and frequently features in inscriptions of the First Dynasty pharaohs. In the earliest renditions of the god, he appears in animal form as a jackal. He was later anthropomorphized into the jackal-headed deity that is familiar today.   Anubis’s connection to jackals stems from the fact that jackals were commonly found in and around cemeteries, scavenging and consuming dead bodies not buried deep enough. Experts suggest that the concept of a jackal god arose either from attempts to control the jackals and prevent this behavior, or to comfort family members by suggesting that the bodies were being devoured by the gods.   Interestingly, jackals are predominantly brown, but Anubis is portrayed as a black jackal. Black was the color of the fertile soil deposited by the Nile that was essential in crop cycles. Therefore, the Egyptians associated black with the cycle of birth, death, and renewal.   Stela of the sistrum-player Wedjashu depicting Anubis and Osiris, Ptolemaic Egypt, c. 2nd Century BCE. Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art.   The name Anubis comes to us from the Greeks. The Egyptians called him Anpu or Inpu. The etymology of the name shows close connections to the word inp, meaning “to decay,” and inpu, meaning “royal child.” This makes sense as in most Egyptian mythologies Anubis was the adopted son of the king of the gods, Osiris.   Anubis had many epithets, such as “Foremost of the Westerners” (Westerners refers to the dead), “Counter of Hearts,” “Chief of the Necropolis,” and “Dog Who Swallows Millions.”   Anubis was more significant in the early pantheons of Egyptian gods, especially in Upper Egypt, where he was originally considered the principal god of the dead. His mythology was then merged with that of Osiris, who was popular in Lower Egypt. While different narratives survive, Anubis ultimately becomes the god of mummification, cemeteries, and funerary rituals. By the Middle Kingdom, he is also a guide for souls traveling to the underworld.   As well as Osiris, Anubis shared a close connection with the god Wepwawet, or “the Opener or the Ways,” a gray wolf-headed deity, who was occasionally depicted as a gray jackal-headed deity. The cult of Wepwawet also originated in Upper Egypt with similar responsibility for funerary rites and guiding the dead. But Wepwawet’s attributes were largely absorbed by Anubis early in Egyptian history. He became a scout-like deity with an important part in royal processions and the military.   The fact that Anubis’ cult flourished while those of other gods were diminished, especially in the face of the rising popularity of the Ennead of Heliopolis (nine key Egyptian deities including Osiris and Isis) at the start of the Middle Kingdom, attests to his importance.   Anubis Mythology Metal statue of Isis, Osiris, and Horus (left to right), Egyptian, c. 664-30 BCE. Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art.   Egyptian mythology is complicated because it is not built on a single accepted canon of events. Multiple conflicting myths can be accepted at the same time, and the mythology of Anubis is an example of this. Anubis is best known for his role in the afterlife created for Osiris, but his role differs in different versions of the myth.   In some versions, Isis finds an abandoned infant Anubis while she is searching for the body parts of her murdered husband Osiris. She learns that her sister Nephyths had a child with Osiris but cast him aside in fear that her husband, Set, Osiris’s murderer, would discover her adultery. Alternatively, Anubis was born long before the death of Osiris, and Isis intentionally set out with a pack of dogs to find him after hearing of his abandonment by Nephyths. Together, this is the most common narrative for the birth of Anubis. But earlier sources suggest that he was the son of Ra and Hesat. Others claim he was the son of Set, but was kidnapped by Isis. Others declare Anubis’s real mother was Bastet.   Jumilhac Papyrus, Ptolemaic Egypt, c. 330-30 BCE. Source: Louvre Museum.   Regardless of the circumstance of his birth, Anubis is essential to the Osiris myth. Loyal to Isis, he assisted in developing the embalming practice and performed the Opening of the Mouth Ceremony that made Osiris the first mummy.   In some variations of the myth, the still-young Anubis aids Isis in the embalming of Osiris with further help from Thoth, the god of healing. In other accounts, Anubis was already a firmly established deity. For example, in the Pyramid Texts of Unas, Anubis acted as a guide in finding the body parts of Osiris. Some stories claim that when Osiris was reborn in the underworld, Anubis stepped down from his position as god of the dead to show respect to Osiris. This narrative may have come from loyal followers of Anubis to preserve the god’s reputation when Osiris became more popular.   In the Jumilhac Papyrus, a Ptolemaic era funerary manuscript, Anubis’s importance in the Osiris myth is demonstrated further. In this narrative, Anubis repeatedly defeated Set while he was trying to steal Osiris’s body from the wabet, where the body is embalmed. On his first attempt, Set transformed himself into Anubis to get past the guards. But when Set left with the body, Anubis went after Set and showed no fear when Set transformed himself into a bull. Eventually, the incident would lead to Anubis castrating Set and returning to the wabet with Osiris’s body.   On another occasion, Set transformed himself into a large cat, but again he was defeated by Anubis, who branded him with hot irons. This myth also explains how leopards got their spots. On Set’s final attempt, Anubis killed Set and then wore his flayed skin.   Role of Anubis in the Afterlife Scene from Papyrus of Ani depicting the Weighing of the Heart, Luxor, Egypt, ca 1250 BCE. Source: British Museum.   His important role in the Osiris myth was key to Anubis’ prevalence and longevity in Egyptian religion. He would feature heavily in rituals and ideology concerning the afterlife. Anubis assumed the position of god of embalming, and was also a guardian of the dead and a guide for souls.   Priests wore Anubis masks when they prepared the body of the deceased for its final resting place and priests of the cult of Anubis were skilled in herbal healing. The use of fragrant herbs in the embalming process was said to help Anubis find the deceased to guide and protect them. His use of the sense of smell reflected his canine characteristics.   Statue of Anubis, Ptolemaic Egypt, c. 332-30 BCE. Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art.   After the funeral rites had been performed by the living, including the Opening of the Mouth Ceremony, which enabled the deceased to breathe, see, eat, and drink again, Anubis would be the first deity to meet the deceased and lead them into the Duat and to the Hall of Truth. The deceased would then wait with other souls outside the hall where they would be comforted by Qehebut, Anubis’s daughter and a goddess of purification.   During the Weighing of the Heart Ceremony, Anubis was front and center when it came to helping Osiris judge the souls of the deceased. In this ceremony, the heart of the deceased was weighed against the feather of Ma’at (goddess of order and truth), and if it balanced the scales, the deceased was able to advance to the A’aru, the Field of Reeds or the Egyptian afterlife (often conflated with Christian heaven). The scales would only balance if the person had been good throughout their lifetime. If their heart was heavier than the feather, it would be thrown to the floor and devoured by the monster Ammut, and the soul of the deceased would cease to exist.   The preservation of the Khat or human body as part of the soul after death was essential in Egyptian afterlife beliefs. The deceased required a connection to the earthly realm to absorb the offerings left by the living in a supernatural way that would sustain the soul. Hence, a guardian of cemeteries, the role Anubis took on, was an indispensable part of the Egyptian pantheon.   A Tale of Two Brothers Papyrus D’Orbiney, 19th Dynasty Egypt, c. 1292-1189 BCE. Source: British Museum.   A completely different myth about Anubis appears in the Tale of Two Brothers. It describes Anubis as the older brother of Bata, a lesser-known local Egyptian bull-god. The Papyrus D’Orbiney dated to the 19th Dynasty is the only known copy of the story.   It begins with the semi-divine brothers living on a farm along with Anubis’s wife, where the age difference means that the couple acts more like parents towards Bata. While Anubis is absent, his wife attempts to seduce Bata. But when he angrily rejects her, the wife tells Anubis that Bata attacked her. Anubis attempts to kill Bata in revenge, but he swears his innocence. To prove it, he cuts off his penis and throws it into a crocodile-infested lake.   Anubis returns home and kills his wife. Meanwhile the gods take pity on Bata and create a wife for him. Sadly, Bata’s new wife leaves him to be with a pharaoh, but Bata devises a cunning plan. Bata disguises himself as a tree, which his wife orders to be cut down. But on her order, a splinter flies into her mouth which impregnates her and Bata is reborn from her. Upon his ascension to the throne, he appoints his brother as his successor and the two brothers are reunited as friends.   Bust of Seti II, New Kingdom Egypt, c. 1200–1194 BCE. Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art.   It has been suggested that the tale was a political satire and uses the gods as allegorical figures. An overt theme is the connection between kingship and divinity. At the start of the story the narrator declares that a “god’s virility is within” Bata. It is a divine spark, in the form of a splinter, that impregnates Bata’s unfaithful wife and gives birth to the next ruler.   Kingship is even at the center of the confusing position of Bata’s wife, who also becomes his mother. She is suggestive of how royal women are essential as both wives and mothers and transition between the roles. Historian Susan Hollis also suggests the story is representative of the power struggle after the reign of Merneptah in the 19th Dynasty when his sons, Seti II and Amenmesse, both attempted to succeed him.   Anubis After Egypt Marble statue of Anubis in Roman dress, Roman, c. 1st-2nd century CE. Source: Vatican Museum.   Between the Late Period (664-332 BCE) and the Ptolemaic Period (332-30 BCE), Anubis became increasingly associated with necromancy and could be summoned to communicate with the dead. The Greeks and Romans were fascinated with him and he was the only Egyptian deity worshiped outside of Egypt in his animal form.   Anubis was connected to the Greek god Hermes during the Greco-Roman period to create Hermanubis, a god of guidance and who led souls to the underworld. Anubis or Hermanubis was worshiped in the Roman world until the 2nd century CE and was portrayed most frequently on gems or amulets. He has also been found on terracotta lamps, and effigies of Anubis have been found in Pompeii. Prominent Roman writers such as Virgil and Lucian mention Anubis, albeit rather critically.   Greek gem inscribed with image of Anubis with the word tyche, meaning “good luck,” possibly used as a wax seal as the writing is in reverse, Karanis, Egypt, c. 1st century BCE-1st century CE. Source: University of Michigan Library.   Anubis was popular with philosophers and alchemists in Medieval Europe. This was likely because the Egyptians, or at least the Ptolemaic Egyptians, established many beliefs within alchemy, thus later alchemists followed their studies. However, increasingly by the Renaissance, Thoth and his counterpart association with Hermes, named Hermes Trismegistos, replaced Anubis.   In pop culture, Anubis appears frequently, but is usually not very accurately portrayed. Despite being a cult favorite and important deity in ancient Egypt, in modern media, Anubis is typically presented as an evil god of the dead. In The Mummy franchise, Anubis is an overarching villain. In the acclaimed Spelunky 2 video game, the player must fight Anubis for his scepter. Despite not physically appearing, in Nickelodeon’s TV series House of Anubis, the “curse of Anubis” brings about death. Mr Jaquel in Neil Gaiman’s American Gods is perhaps a more accurate portrayal as he appears as a calm man trying to make a living by running a funeral home.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

Who Was the Last Aboriginal Tasmanian?
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

Who Was the Last Aboriginal Tasmanian?

  For many years, it was believed that the Aboriginal people of Tasmania had become extinct and that their culture, languages, and customs were lost due to the devastating impact of British colonialism. There have been ongoing debates about who was “the last Aboriginal Tasmanian,” with two candidates being considered: Truganini and Fanny Cochrane Smith. However, it is now acknowledged that the Aboriginal Tasmanians did not die out in 1876 when Truganini passed away, or in 1905 when Fanny Cochrane Smith died near Oyster Cove. Both women were more than just the labels assigned to them by historians.   Aboriginal Tasmanians: A Doomed Race? Model ship by Glen Mackie, contemporary artist. Source: Australian Museum Collection   By 1818, less than 20 years after contact, the Aboriginal population had fallen from around 7,000 to about 5,000. At this point, parity had been reached between the colonial and the Aboriginal population, although among settlers women were in a distinct minority. Within a generation of the invasion, the Indigenous population dropped to 1,000.   By 1830, that of the South West Nation had fallen from 300 to only 60 members. Similar numbers can be observed among the other eight nations, decimated by the ruthless colonial violence of the Black War (1824-1832) and the Black Line (between September and November 1830), as well as by the several European-imported illnesses that have killed Indigenous peoples across the whole world, particularly influenza. Who was to blame for what is now recognized as the genocide of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders?   Eddie Mabo, in 1989, the 1992 Mabo Decision discarded the “terra nullius” concept. Source: National Museum of Australia   In the early 1800s and for decades to come, British settlers invoked the “doomed race” concept, which is today widely accepted as a form of scientific racism. According to this theory, Aboriginal people were too “savage” and primitive to survive the impact of the more “advanced” European culture. In a way, it was their fault: they were directly responsible for their own disappearance and, in 1803, they already were on the road to extinction.   The “doomed race” concept, and the accompanying religious beliefs in fatalism, were all meant to absolve settlers and deny their responsibility for the death of thousands of men, women, and children. For almost two centuries, Aboriginal Tasmanians have been considered extinct. Once again, this is the direct result of years of colonial fabrications.   Truganini (1812-1876) Truganini, photograph by Alfred Winter, 1869. Source: Wikimedia Commons   Truganini was a member of the South East Nation. The ancestral lands of their people, the most maritime nation on the whole island, ran from present-day New Norfolk, on the west bank of the River Derwent, to Storm Bay. They occupied the southeast coastline for more than 500 kilometers (311 miles), including Bruny Island and the waters of the D’Entrecasteaux Channel. Hobart was founded on their lands.   Truganini, who belonged to the Nuenonne, was born in 1812 at Recherche Bay, in the area around the D’Entrecasteaux Channel. Her mother was a Ninine woman from Port Davey, and her father, Manganerer, was the chief of the Lyluequonny Clan. Later in life, Truganini expressed her desire to be buried in the D’Entrecasteaux Channel, in its deepest part, away from British scientists and bone collectors, near the stone quarry where her father and her first partner, Woorraddy, often went to manufacture their flaked stone tools.   Bruny Island, Tasmania, photograph by Patrick McGregor, 2021. Source: Unsplash   Truganini’s life is intertwined with the colonial history of Van Diemen’s Land. At the time, sealers operating in the Bass Strait were often reported abducting, raping, and killing Aboriginal women, especially those of the South East Nation. A European sailor stabbed and killed Truganini’s mother and a British soldier shot her uncle. Truganini’s two sisters were abducted by John Baker, an African American sailor, and taken to live with yet another sealer on Kangaroo Island. One of them, Moorinna, was accidentally shot and died there.   In her seminal book Tasmanian Aborigines, historian Lyndall Ryan reports that Truganini’s fiancé Paraweena was “thrown out of a boat by sawyers who (…) then cut off his fingers while he clung to the side of the vessel.”   Truganini, portrait by Thomas Bock, 1831-2. Source: National Portrait Gallery   The winter of 1829 represented a turning point in Truganini’s life: her father died, she partnered with Woorraddy, chief of the Nuenonne clan, and she met G.A. Robinson (1791-1866), who had been hired by the colony’s governor Sir George Arthur (1784-1854) as the “mediator” between settlers and Aboriginal people. Over the next few years, between 1830 and 1834, she accompanied him on his missions across Van Diemen’s Land to convince the remaining Aboriginal clans, both inside and outside the Settled Districts, to surrender.   In October 1835, Truganini arrived at Wybalenna (“Black man’s houses”), an Aboriginal settlement on the west coast of Flinders Island. In 1833, it accommodated around 120 Aboriginal people. At Wybalenna, Truganini partnered with Weernerpaterlargenna, a man of the Big River Nation who was assigned the European name, Alphonso. A new phase in her life had just begun.   Trousers Point Beach on Flinders Island, 1930s. Source: Furneaux Museum   Weernerpaterlargenna died in 1847, just as the Wybalenna community was being relocated to Oyster Cove. Known among Aboriginal people as putalina, Oyster Cove was a former penal station built in 1843 and abandoned two years later because it was considered unfit for convicts due to its poor health standards. The entire station was damp and cold, especially in the winter months.   The death rate among its Aboriginal population was shocking. By July 1871, only two women still lived at Oyster Cove. One was Mary Ann, Walter Arthur’s wife, who died in July, and the other was Truganini. At this point, she was arguably the most famous (and respected) Aboriginal woman in Tasmania. Ryan notes that in the years after her death, she was still “remembered with considerable affection. Some of the settlers recalled her marvellous eyesight, great good humour, extraordinary knowledge of the bush and the stars, and prowess as a swimmer.”   Truganini, Mary Ann, William Lanney, and Bessy Clark, photograph by Henry Frith, 1866. Source: National Portrait Gallery   Always accompanied by her faithful dogs, she was often seen heading to Nicholls Rivulet to meet with Fanny Cochrane Smith. She died, surrounded by her dogs, in early May 1876, at Mrs Dandrige’s house in Macquarie Street, in Hobart, where she had relocated after the floods at Oyster Cove two years earlier, in the winter of 1874. Wrapped in a white shroud, she was buried in a coffin covered with native flowers.   Her remains suffered the same fate as those of William Lanney (also known as King Billy or William Lanne). He was the “last full-blood Aboriginal man” and (probably) Truganini’s third partner. Two years after her death, the Royal Society of Tasmania exhumed her remains, stored them in a box, and sent them to Melbourne.   Fanny Cochrane Smith Horace Watson recorded the songs of Fanny Cochrane Smith using an Edison phonograph, 1903. Source: National Film and Sound Archive of Australia   Truganini’s death in 1876 was announced as the “death of the last full-blood Tasmanian” and hailed as the testimony of the inevitable demise of an inferior race. This was of course far from the truth.   Fanny Cochrane Smith was the first child born at the Wybalenna Aboriginal Establishment. Her mother, Tanganutura (also known as Tarenootairrer and Sarah), was a woman of the North East Nation, probably a member of the Pinterrairer clan from Layrappenthe country, south of Cape Portland. Around 1815 she was abducted by James Parish, a sealer operating in the Bass Strait. Years later, she was among the Aboriginal men and women taken by G.A. Robinson to Flinders Island. Here she met Nicermenic, a man from Robbins Island, who would become her lifelong partner. Together they had Fanny, who was born in December 1832. At the age of eight, she was taken from them and sent to Queen’s Orphan School.   Oyster Cove was known among Aboriginal Tasmanians as putalina, photograph by Kraig Carlstrom. Source: National Museum of Australia   Upon her return to Wybalenna, Fanny was sent to live and work as a domestic servant in the home of catechist Robert Clark. Cochrane was Clark’s wife’s maiden name. Clark’s methods were so brutal that Fanny once attempted to burn down his home. Five years later, she and the other survivors of Wybalenna were dispatched to Oyster Cove. Truganini was among them.   At Oyster Cove, Fanny Cochrane married English sawyer John Smith, an ex-convict who had been convicted for stealing a donkey. From 1857 until his death, they lived together at Nicholls Rivulet, not far from Oyster Cove, on a dowry allotted to them by the colony’s government. Over the years they built a business cutting and selling timber. Both Fanny’s brother and mother died at Oyster Cove and the entire Oyster Cove community gathered to perform ceremonies and bid them farewell.   The Conciliation, painting Benjamin Duterrau, 1840. Source: National Portrait Gallery   Truganini often visited Fanny Cochrane Smith at her farm at Nicholls Rivulet. Together they would teach children the corroboree songs of their ancestors, how and where to catch possums, and where to find the abalone shells to make necklaces. In one of her most famous photographs, Fanny Cochrane is seen wearing shell necklaces and possum skins over her late Victorian dress. Her hair is adorned with wildflowers. It was taken in 1888 and she was 54 years old. Fanny was very well respected by the Aboriginal community and by settlers alike. The picture exemplifies Fanny’s ability to live and thrive in between worlds.   At her home, she would teach the culture of her ancestors to her children — six boys and five girls. She would go out into the bush to gather bush food and dive for shellfish, just like her ancestors did. Then, along with her husband, she would organize fundraising efforts to build a Methodist church for her community.   Walter Lyall and pupils in Dryazell schoolroom on Flinders Island, 1909. Source: Furneaux Museum   She was 65 when she met Horace Watson in 1899. The son of a builder from Leicestershire who had migrated to Adelaide in 1852, he was a pharmacist and entrepreneur. His mother came from Sussex. Watson saw Fanny sing at the Theatre Royal (where she performed twice over the years) and asked her to make phonograph recordings of her songs. Over a series of sessions, between 1899 and 1903, they recorded some of the songs of Fanny’s ancestors. They are the only recordings ever made of Tasmanian Aboriginal songs. The first was made in the rooms of the Royal Society of Tasmania in 1899.   The eight wax cylinders are now in the permanent collection of the Tasmanian Museum & Art Gallery. Copies are held at the National Film and Sound Archive in Canberra. Today, thanks to Fanny’s and Watson’s cylinder recordings, linguists have been able to reconstruct one Tasmanian Aboriginal language: Palawa Kani.   Fanny Cochrane Smith’s wax cylinder recordings. Source: National Committee of Australia   Fanny Cochrane Smith died aged 74 on February 24, 1905 and was buried the following day at Wattle Grove Cemetery at Port Cygnet. More than 400 people showed up to follow her funeral cortège. Only one year before, Truganini’s remains had been taken to the Tasmanian Museum, but Fanny’s remains were left undisturbed. Her descendants form a vital part of today’s Aboriginal community. Rodney Dillon, for instance, the Tasmanian Commissioner for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC), is one of Fanny’s great-great-grandsons.   Examples of “Extreme Primitivism” Petroglyphs in Northern Tasmania. Source: National Museum of Australia   By the time the Black War was over, colonists had stopped regarding Aboriginal men, women, and children as human beings. In the late 1850s, the Aboriginal people at Oyster Cove were mere “scientific curiosities.” Scientists and bone collectors from across the globe, particularly from England, were now treating their remains as trophies to be collected, studied, and displayed in museums for Europeans to marvel at.   In 1867, Morton Allport, a lawyer from Hobart, dug up the remains of one of the members of the Oyster Cove community, Bessy Clark, and sent them to the Hunterian Museum in London. A similar, if not even more barbarian fate, attended William Lanney, a respected and beloved figure among Aboriginal people at Oyster Cove. After his death in March 1869, his body was transferred to the morgue at the Colonial Hospital.   William Lanney, by Charles Woolley, 1866. Source: National Portrait Gallery   Here Dr William Crowther, a member of the Royal College of Surgeons in London, cut off his head and inserted that of another (white) man in his place. The head was later transported to the School of Anatomy at the University of Edinburgh. The night after the funeral, Dr Crowther, Dr Stokell and other members of the Royal Society arrived at St David’s Cemetery, dug up Lanney’s body, and further dismembered it.   Although Fanny Cochrane Smith’s death was announced as “the death of the last Tasmanian,” neither she nor William Lanney nor Truganini were “the last” Aboriginal people in Tasmania. At that time, a large Aboriginal community could still be found on the islands of the Bass Strait.   A hundred years after Truganini’s death, Roy Nicholls campaigned to have her remains removed from the museum where they had been stored for so many decades. He succeeded. Truganini’s remains were finally cremated and her ashes scattered in the deepest recesses of the D’Entrecasteaux Channel, on lands sacred to her and her ancestors.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

Why Were Germany’s Blitzkrieg Tactics So Effective in WWII?
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

Why Were Germany’s Blitzkrieg Tactics So Effective in WWII?

  In 1940, French historian Marc Bloch witnessed the swift invasion of France by the Wehrmacht. He noted the Germans’ “embarrassing skill in appearing where they ought not to have appeared.” In 1939, the German army had similarly overcome Polish forces. During World War II, the European press coined “Blitzkrieg” (lightning war) for the seemingly unstoppable German advance. This term described the new German doctrine of flexible maneuvers with mechanized forces and air power, which stunned Allied military observers.   Who Invented the Term Blitzkrieg?  Nazi propaganda poster on the invasion of Poland. The headline reads “Victory in the air against Poland.” Source: Lebendiges Museum Online   “Blitzkrieg! Blitzkrieg! Blitzkrieg!” proudly proclaimed an article in the Ostasiatischer Beobachter, “that word was flashed at us everywhere during the weeks between the defeat of France and the start of major air attacks against England.” The author of the piece, aptly titled Blitzkriegpsychose (Blitzkrieg Psychosis), also remarked that the term Blitzkrieg was so evocative that it inspired fear in the opponents of Nazi Germany. “With the speed and force of lightning, our Wehrmacht struck and destroyed every obstacle,” boasted the magazine’s contributor.   In the early years of World War II, the word Blitzkrieg became a permanent fixture of everyday vocabulary. Despite its undeniable popularity, the exact origins of the term remain unclear. In the English language, Blitzkrieg was allegedly introduced in 1939 by Time magazine to describe the swift invasion of Poland. In the following months, the British press used the German word almost constantly in its coverage of the new conflict. During the Battle of Britain, the term Blitzkrieg even inspired journalists to coin several English neologisms. Thus, the raids of the Luftwaffe became “the Blitz” and the German attackers were often referred to as “the blitzers.”   While the word Blitzkrieg first gained traction in English-speaking countries, Time was not the first publication to mention it. In 1935, the periodical Deutsche Wehr (German Defense) used the term in an article suggesting that countries with limited resources should launch short and swift military campaigns. Three years later, another German magazine described Blitzkrieg as a “strategic surprise attack.” While these instances show that the term already existed in the German language by the time World War II broke out, the Wehrmacht never used it to describe its official military doctrine.   Was Blitzkrieg a Revolutionary Doctrine?  German war prisoners in Nanteuil-sur-Marne, 1918. Germany’s Schlieffen Plan, based on the Bewegungskrieg (war of movement), bogged down in trench warfare. Source: Lebendiges Museum Online   At the beginning of World War II, faced with the rapid advance of the Wehrmacht, the Allies believed they were dealing with an offensive strategy never seen before on a battlefield. The academic discourse of the postwar period cemented the idea of Blitzkrieg as a revolutionary tactic pioneered by the Nazi regime. Captain Robert O’Neill claimed in a 1965 essay that the German Army “went on to develop a new form of warfare by which its rivals when it came to the test were hopelessly outclassed.”   In more recent years, however, military historians and experts have challenged the depiction of Blitzkrieg as an invention of the Third Reich, declaring that the more agile approach of fighting resulted from a military tradition dating back to Frederick the Great. German commanders, tasked with defending a country surrounded by potential opponents on every side, had always relied on fast maneuvering to attack the superior enemy forces with a single fatal blow. In his influential Vom Krieg (On War), Prussian General Claus von Clausewitz dubbed this tactic Schwerpunktprinzip (concentration principle). Rather than dispersing their forces, the military strategist advised officers to identify the opponents’ Schwerpunkt (center of gravity).   A German tank in France on June 21, 1940. Source: The Atlantic   Speed of maneuver was also at the heart of the Schlieffen Plan, the military strategy implemented by the German army during World War I. Devised to avoid a long and draining static conflict, the plan aimed to defeat Germany’s enemies with a double envelopment to achieve through a single swift blow. In 1870, General Helmuth von Moltke had already successfully executed a similar tactic at Sedan, the location of the decisive battle of the Franco-Prussian War. In 1914, however, the desired Bewgungskrieg (war of movement) quickly turned into a trench warfare that eventually exhausted Germany’s resources.   Speed, Communications, and Technology  Major General Heinz Guderian, one of the masterminds behind the Blitzkrieg tactics. Source: Lebendiges Museum Online   World War I marked a turning point in the history of warfare. Among the new military technologies employed in the bloody battles were the first tanks, heavy armored vehicles able to advance through trenches and spread terror in the enemy’s lines. In the postwar period, when European military leaders were busy reevaluating their military doctrine, German army officers sought to find effective ways to make their centuries-old tradition of Bewegungskrieg sustainable on the modern battlefield. Their main objective was to prevent future campaigns from bogging down in static confrontations unsuited for a country surrounded by better-equipped opponents. After all, as von Clausewitz had already pointed out, war “was an act of violence to force our enemies to do our will.”   In 1937, Heinz Guderian, a young Wehrmacht officer, suggested that mobility and speed could be increased by capitalizing on the full potential of the new mechanized machines: the tanks. In his Achtung-Panzer!, Guderian argued that the tank divisions were better suited than the artillery or cavalry “to carry out operation envelopment and turning movements in the open field.” Once the tanks had set the rhythm of the attack, a successful break through of the enemy lines would then be achieved with the coordinated cooperation of the motorized infantry and the air force.   German panzers (tanks) on the Western Front. Source: Welt   In the 1930s, when the German commanders, considerably downsized after the Treaty of Versailles, began to test its mechanized warfare on the training grounds, they quickly realized that the outcome of their “war of movement” almost entirely relied on the speed of communications between the different divisions involved in the exercises. Thus, the newly introduced radio technology became a key component of what would later become known as Blitzkrieg. In 1932, during the Funkübung (Radio Exercise), the German radio operators were the coordinators of the operations.   Besides constant communication between the troops, flexible decision making was another key element of the fast-moving maneuvering. Indeed, a rigid chain of command would be unsuited for the rapid tempo of Bewegungskrieg. Only officers fully immersed in the actions could be constantly aware of the situation on the battlefield. Thus, they could quickly adapt their orders and direct the attack to the most effective target.   Blitzkrieg in Action: The Fall of France  The Maginot Line, the fortified structure on the border between France and Germany. Source: ECPAD   While the German army perfected its new form of mechanized maneuvering, the French military commanders opted to defend their country from future attacks by building a defensive barrier, commonly known as the Maginot Line, along the border between France and Germany. As the previous conflict had turned into trench warfare, the French military elite believed the imponent construction, consisting of several fortifications, bunkers, and minefields, would be the best way to fight another static war. “The French Army is stronger than ever before in its history,” optimistically claimed General Maxime Weygand in July 1939, “its equipment is the best, its fortifications are first-rate, its morale is excellent, and it has an outstanding High Command.”   In 1940, when the Third Reich had already successfully invaded Poland, General Maurice Gamelin was still convinced the Maginot Line would successfully thwart any aggression. In January, he even declared that “he would be ready to give a billion to the Germans, provided they would do him the favor of taking the initiative in the attack.” However, in May, when the Wehrmacht invaded the Low Countries and France, the predictions of the French Supreme Command failed to come true. On the contrary, the Germans forced their opponent to sue for peace after only a few weeks of fighting.   As the Germans advanced in Belgium and the Netherlands, the French commanders deployed the majority of the troops to the border, planning for a bataille conduite (methodical battle), a type of warfare based on a rigid structure and focused on defense. The Germans, however, were set to avoid a repeat of World War I. The plan devised by General Erich von Manstein, later nicknamed Operation Sickle Cut, consisted of a breakthrough into the enemy forces followed by encirclement maneuvers. The scheme hinged on an unexpected advance of the Panzer divisions through the Ardennes Forest, a rough terrain the French considered impenetrable.   Front page of the NSDAP newspaper Völkischer Beobachter announcing the breakthrough of the Maginot Line during the Battle of France, May 17, 1940. Source: Lebendiges Museum Online   In May 1940, however, the Wehrmacht’s Panzer divisions, aided in the air by Stuka dive bombers, drove through the Ardennes Forest, taking the unsuspecting French army by surprise. On May 13, Heinz Guderian led his Panzer Corps across the Meuse River near Sedan. A few days later, he managed to cut through the enemy’s defenses, spreading chaos in the French rear lines. Then, he began marching to the English Channel, where the Germans trapped the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) and other Allied soldiers at Dunkirk.   A key element of the lightning German advance in northern France was the flexible radio communications between the various divisions. While the French field officers had to wait for orders from the High Command located in bunkers far from the actions, their German counterparts made snap decisions independently. In his postwar memoir, Heinz Guderian listed the French static doctrine of warfare among the factors that led to the fall of France. “They wanted a complete picture of the enemy’s order of battle and intentions before deciding on any undertaking,” commented Guderian. However, the centralized chain of command was helpless in front of the swift maneuvers of the Wehrmacht.   Blitzkrieg Between Legend and Propaganda German soldiers in Russia. After an initial success, the Blitzkrieg against Russia turned into a defensive war. Source: Anne Frank House   On June 22, 1940, the French government, led by Marshal Philippe Pétain, signed an armistice with Germany. The signing took place in Compiègen in the same railway car where the German commanders had agreed to the terms of the Allies at the end of World War I.   As the catchphrase Blitzkrieg spread among the Allies observers, the Nazi propaganda started crediting Adolf Hitler as the inventor of the shockingly effective tactics. “Adolf Hitler’s genius as a warlord,” claimed Hermann Goering, “also caused a revolution in warfare in that it breached strategic principles that had been sacrosanct before.” The editor of the Völkischer Beobachter, the newspaper of the NSDAP, praised the Führer with a similar rhetoric, stating that he “[strode] the bold path from static to dynamic warfare.” Thanks to Adolf Hitler’s brilliance, “the revolutionary spirit of his Brown Army swept over Europe’s battlefields,” emphatically added the editor.   After the successful operations in Western Europe, in the summer of 1941, Adolf Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa, hoping to use the improved form of mobile warfare to defeat the Soviet Union. After an initial aggressive thrust against the Russian forces, the Wehrmacht commanders were ultimately unable to replicate the lightning campaign of 1940. Before the German troops could achieve a decisive breakthrough in their opponents’ defenses, the Soviets began their counteroffensive. In January 1943, Field Marshal Friedrich von Paulus, surrounded by the Russians at Stalingrad, surrendered his Fifth Army.   During the remaining years of World War II, the Blitzkrieg method was employed by Allied military leaders, especially U.S. General George Patton. After the end of the war, tactics based on fast maneuvering to defeat the opponent in a single blow continued to inform offensive warfare. The almost legendary Blitzkrieg continued to inspire military leaders and strategists. In 1967, for example, Israel resorted to Blitzkrieg-inspired operations during the Six-Day War against Egypt and Syria.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

Britain’s Witnesses to Buchenwald
Favicon 
www.historytoday.com

Britain’s Witnesses to Buchenwald

Britain’s Witnesses to Buchenwald JamesHoare Thu, 03/20/2025 - 08:55
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

Bloody Mary and the Missing Heir
Favicon 
www.historytoday.com

Bloody Mary and the Missing Heir

Bloody Mary and the Missing Heir JamesHoare Thu, 03/20/2025 - 08:56
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 60152 out of 126267
  • 60148
  • 60149
  • 60150
  • 60151
  • 60152
  • 60153
  • 60154
  • 60155
  • 60156
  • 60157
  • 60158
  • 60159
  • 60160
  • 60161
  • 60162
  • 60163
  • 60164
  • 60165
  • 60166
  • 60167
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund