A bunch of jokers.

from RT: Brussels would do anything to avoid accountability for the billions of euros sent to Kiev, the Hungarian foreign minister has said Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto has accused Brussels bureaucrats of clinging to a “failed pro-war policy” in a desperate attempt to delay the moment when European taxpayers begin asking where the money […]

from BANNED.VIDEO:  TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

According to reports, the World Health Organization (WHO) is proposing to cut staff and reduce its budget following President Trump’s executive order to withdraw funding. BREAKING: World Health Organization to drastically cut its workforce and slash its budget for 2026-27 by 21% after President Trump withdrew funding. — Leading Report (@LeadingReport) March 30, 2025 Per Reuters: That’s according to an internal memo seen by Reuters. U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration withdrew from the WHO upon taking office in January, saying the global health agency had mishandled the COVID-19 pandemic and other international health crises. The memo says the suggested budget cut is more than 20% which is slightly larger than the 18% the WHO receives from the U.S. which is by far its biggest financial backer. The health group also blamed its financial struggles on countries that have reduced development assistance to boost defense spending. JUST IN – WHO has proposed slashing a fifth of its budget following the US decision to withdraw, and must now reduce its reach and workforce, its chief saidhttps://t.co/dv4zueREHd — Insider Paper (@TheInsiderPaper) March 29, 2025 In January, President Trump signed an executive order withdrawing the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO). President Trump Signs Executive Order Withdrawing United States From World Health Organization “The United States noticed its withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2020 due to the organization’s mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic that arose out of Wuhan, China, and other global health crises, its failure to adopt urgently needed reforms, and its inability to demonstrate independence from the inappropriate political influence of WHO member states.  In addition, the WHO continues to demand unfairly onerous payments from the United States, far out of proportion with other countries’ assessed payments.  China, with a population of 1.4 billion, has 300 percent of the population of the United States, yet contributes nearly 90 percent less to the WHO,” the executive order reads. WATCH: ? President Trump withdraws the United States from the World Health Organization pic.twitter.com/YyKYMP53Ur — Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) January 21, 2025 “The World Health Organization regrets the announcement that the United States of America intends to withdraw from the Organization. WHO plays a crucial role in protecting the health and security of the world’s people, including Americans, by addressing the root causes of disease, building stronger health systems, and detecting, preventing and responding to health emergencies, including disease outbreaks, often in dangerous places where others cannot go,” the WHO commented. “The United States was a founding member of WHO in 1948 and has participated in shaping and governing WHO’s work ever since, alongside 193 other Member States, including through its active participation in the World Health Assembly and Executive Board. For over seven decades, WHO and the USA have saved countless lives and protected Americans and all people from health threats. Together, we ended smallpox, and together we have brought polio to the brink of eradication. American institutions have contributed to and benefited from membership in WHO,” it continued. “With the participation of the United States and other Member States, WHO has over the past 7 years implemented the largest set of reforms in its history, to transform our accountability, cost-effectiveness, and impact in countries. This work continues. We hope the United States will reconsider and we look forward to engaging in constructive dialogue to maintain the partnership between the USA and WHO, for the benefit of the health and well-being of millions of people around the globe,” it added. WHO comments on United States announcement of intent to withdraw The World Health Organization regrets the announcement that the United States of America intends to withdraw from the Organization. WHO plays a crucial role in protecting the health and security of the world’s… pic.twitter.com/DT3QJ49bhb — World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) January 21, 2025 NewsNation noted: The U.S. was a founding member of WHO, which directs and coordinates the international response to health emergencies. At a news briefing Tuesday, WHO spokesperson Tarik Jasarevic said the U.S. contributed 18% of the organization’s budget in 2023. “Thanks to decades of strong partnership, the United States of America plays a crucial role in supporting WHO to protect and improve the health of Americans and people around the world,” WHO says on its website. In the 2022-2023 biennium, the United States gave $1.284 billion to WHO. The Associated Press reported that in the last decade, the U.S. has given the organization about $160 million to $815 million every year.

More than 212,000 pounds of liquid egg products have been recalled nationwide due to potential contamination with a cleaning product. “Cargill Kitchen Solutions, a Lake Odessa, Michigan establishment, is recalling approximately 212,268 pounds of liquid egg products that may contain a cleaning solution with sodium hypochlorite,” the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced. New: Over 212,000 pounds of liquid egg products that may contain a cleaning solution with sodium hypochlorite are being recalled nationwide pic.twitter.com/1vWbdTEB4V — The Calvin Coolidge Project (@TheCalvinCooli1) March 30, 2025 Fox News reports: The producer is Cargill Kitchen Solutions, based in Lake Odessa, Michigan. The liquid egg items were produced from March 12-13, 2025. The 212,268 pounds of liquid egg products have the number “G1804” printed on the carton. The items were shipped to distributors in Ohio and Texas and for food service use in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois and Iowa. 212,000 pounds of liquid eggs recalled over concerns toxic cleaning solution contaminated batch https://t.co/6xCCfLDOIe pic.twitter.com/a3FQfY1nnc — New York Post (@nypost) March 29, 2025 Liquid eggs food products are recalled, may have been distributed nationwide https://t.co/Q0zv6Dsu2R — Fox News (@FoxNews) March 29, 2025 Per NewsNation: “After conducting an investigation and thorough assessment of the contents of the cleaning solution, FSIS scientists concluded that use of this product should not cause adverse health consequences, or the risk is negligible, resulting in a Class III recall,” the release said. Class III recalls are considered “marginal risk” per the FSIS. Despite little to no chance of adverse effects, the FSIS urges people to throw the product away or return it to the place of purchase.

We knew this day would come… After a massive run-up – tech stocks are crashing. And as you’d suspect, the rich and powerful got out first. Warren Buffett sold off 115 million shares of Apple last year. David Tepper, who runs one of the most successful hedge funds in history, jettisoned 600,000 shares of Amazon in the fourth quarter of 2024. While at the same time, billionaire Bill Gates has shifted his focus and his wealth away from Microsoft. What do these moves have in common? In each case, rich investors are reducing their exposure to tech and buying into a different sector of the market. Former Presidential Advisor, Jim Rickards has a surprising take on what’s happening and why. He thinks it’s all thanks in part to a recent move by President Trump. Something no President in history has attempted before. Rickards says Trump could soon unleash a vast $150 trillion fortune. And not a single penny will flood into tech stocks. Instead, he predicts, it will gush into a tiny sector of the market, which is a fraction the size of NVIDIA. We recently caught up with Rickards to get the full story. If he’s correct, some investors will see a windfall – starting as soon as May 3rd. To watch this fascinating interview, free of charge, click here. (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!)

Gun owners, does this sound familiar? The car is FINALLY packed and you’re hitting the road. But then “IT” hits you: You’re armed… but you’re not sure about the gun laws where you’re going. Vacation, road trips, and visiting family is supposed to be RELAXING. You’re a law-abiding citizen. You just want to protect yourself and your loved ones. But that doesn’t mean you have all the laws memorized. And if you break one… Local officials won’t have a problem slapping you with a fine or a set of handcuffs. And maybe taking your gun. That’s why you need this 100% FREE Gun Law map that has just been made available to every US gun owner. Click here to discover the answers to the most important concealed carry questions for every state like… Which states honor my concealed carry permit? How do I legally carry a gun in my vehicle while traveling? Which states REQUIRE me to reveal that I have a gun to a police officer during a traffic stop? How many rounds can my magazine legally hold? Can I legally carry in state and national parks and forests? Can I legally carry in bars or restaurants that serve alcohol (even WITH my permit)? Can I legally carry at roadside rest areas? Can I legally have a gun in my hotel room? Are “No Weapons Allowed” signs enforceable by law in my state? And many more answers you need to be aware of… If you ever cross state lines, you NEED to get this 100% FREE Gun Law map that’s now available to the public. This interactive map allows you to quickly see the laws in your state or ANY state you plan to visit. It’s constantly updated to reflect changes in gun laws across the country. You can save you from getting arrested for breaking a law you didn’t even KNOW about. And more importantly, you’ll be able to actually ENJOY traveling like you were meant to. Click here to get your 100% FREE Gun Law Map today. (Note: Thank you for supporting America-First businesses like those presenting a sponsored message in this article, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support and the opportunity to bring you great opportunities like this! I hope you find it helpful!)

The enormous iconic tree that sits at the grand entrance to the White House is slated to be chopped down in the coming days. The Southern Magnolia, purportedly planted from seed that Andrew Jackson brought from his Tennessee home, has stood for nearly 200 years. Ironically, there has been much debate since President Trump’s first term regarding perceived similarities between him and the alleged planter of the tree in question; the seventh President of the United States, who served from 1829-1837. Brian Kilmeade gave a great breakdown of that debate back during President Trump’s first term, on the heels of writing a book about President Andrew Jackson. I’ll use that VERY INTERESTING video as a primer for this story: Regardless of that interesting debate, the tree attributed to Andrew Jackson is now slated to be cut down for safety reasons. President Trump announced the plans to chop down the historical “witness tree” today, saying that it “must come to an end”: Trump announces plan to chop down magnolia tree purportedly planted by Andrew Jackson: ‘Must come to an end’ https://t.co/9iKRzAcdn6 — Fox News (@FoxNews) March 30, 2025 Though the tree will soon be put on the chopping block (I’ll see myself out), there are apparently plans to salvage the wood. The President stated that the preserved wood would likely be used for “other high and noble purposes”, presumably in the White House, according to Fox News: “One of the interesting dilemmas is a tree planted many years ago by the Legendary President and General, Andrew Jackson,” Trump described. “It is a Southern Magnolia, that came from his home, The Hermitage, in Tennessee. That’s the good news!” “The bad news is that everything must come to an end, and this tree is in terrible condition, a very dangerous safety hazard, at the White House Entrance, no less, and must now be removed,” he continued. The historic tree will be chopped down in coming days, and Trump wrote that it will be replaced “by another, very beautiful tree.” “The Historic wood from the tree will be preserved by the White House Staff, and may be used for other high and noble purposes!!!” the president added. Jackson, who served as president from 1829 to 1837, reportedly planted two magnolia trees near the White House in honor of his wife Rachel, who died in 1828. But according to the National Park Service’s (NPS) website, the trees’ connection to Old Hickory is debatable. Coincidentally, I used a photo of the White House in a story this morning which DOES NOT show the Jackson tree, but which actually shows a tree on the opposite side of the White House. But in that story, one of President Trump’s top team members teases plans for a little remodeling in her section of the West Wing: ‘Ice Maiden’ Floats Major Change in the West Wing – “If [President Trump] Will Let Me” It occurs to me that the 'MAJOR CHANGE' Wiles' said she'd like to make to her section of offices in the West Wing... COULD BE DONE using wood from Andrew Jackson's tree! How awesomely historic would that be! Here's the announcement President Trump made on his Truth Social account regarding the imminent felling of the great tree: And here's the full text of his announcement for easier viewing: Working together with a fantastic and very talented Executive Residence Staff, along with the wonderful people at the National Park Service, we are making tremendous enhancements to the White House, thereby preserving and protecting History! One of the interesting dilemmas is a tree planted many years ago by the Legendary President and General, Andrew Jackson. It is a Southern Magnolia, that came from his home, The Hermitage, in Tennessee. That’s the good news! The bad news is that everything must come to an end, and this tree is in terrible condition, a very dangerous safety hazard, at the White House Entrance, no less, and must now be removed. This process will take place next week, and will be replaced by another, very beautiful tree. The Historic wood from the tree will be preserved by the White House Staff, and may be used for other high and noble purposes!!! Oddly enough, I keep stumbling on news clips and stories announcing that the White House is planning to cut the tree down... FROM 7 YEARS AGO!? I honestly don't know why the tree wasn't removed as planned, but it was apparently in the works to remove it during President Trump's first term for exactly the same reasons -- but for some unknown reason, it never happened. Here's a story from 7 YEARS AGO that aged perfectly describing the removal plans, and the story is still just as relevant as it would have been written a few days ago: I also stumbled on ANOTHER story from the same time period describing plans to cut down the tree from the Washington Post. This story has even more interesting historical info than the previous clip: The ultimate decision this go around was apparently made after President Trump consulted with those in charge of the Executive Residence, and the National Park Service -- which maintains the grounds of the White House. I did find one possible clue that the plans to remove the tree entirely in 2017 may have morphed into a salvage effort. There is mention of a 'branch removal and pruning' that occurred in 2017, according to a report in The Hill: The White House will remove from its property a magnolia tree planted nearly 200 years ago with seeds said to have been brought from former President Jackson’s home in Tennessee. President Trump announced Sunday that, after consulting with the Executive Residence Staff and the National Park Service, the administration has decided to replace the tree, saying it poses a safety hazard. The tree was planted with seeds from a tree at The Hermitage, Jackson’s home in Tennessee, to honor his late wife, Rachel, who died just months before Jackson took office. Efforts have been made for decades to preserve the historic tree, which underwent a “significant branch removal and pruning in December 2017,” according to The National Park Service. Though the historic tree has seen its last days overlooking the entrance to the White House, I'm interested to find out what unique pieces of furniture or décor might come from its wood, intended to grace the halls of the People's House. I'm also curious to find out what tree might be put in its' place, as there has always been talk of a replacement, even during the 2017 planned removal. It wouldn't surprise me to learn that President Trump had plans to plant a tree in honor of those who endured the same type of lawfare he did at the hands of those responsible for the J6 tragedies. Maybe an Oak... with a particularly strong limb about 20 feet up, to serve as notice to those willing to make a mockery out of the American justice system to satisfy their own political needs? That's my vote -- a good strong American Oak, right in front of the White House entrance. We could name it "The Tree of Justice". Maybe the National Park Service could just identify a mature specimen, and transplant it -- ready for immediate use?

Utah became the first state to prohibit unapproved flags from being flown at government buildings and schools, including LGBTQ+ pride flags and “Make America Great Again” flags. Gov. Spencer Cox, a Republican, allowed the bill to become law without his signature. BANNED: Violators will receive a hefty fine for displaying any flag other than the American flag, the state flag, military flags, or a handful of others approved by lawmakers. The move is met with pushback as opponents argue it undercuts free speech and takes authority away from… pic.twitter.com/0FaCIlemvl — Fox News (@FoxNews) March 29, 2025 Fox News reports: Gov. Spencer Cox, a Republican, announced he was allowing the ban on unsanctioned flag displays to become law without his signature. Although he continues to have serious concerns about the policy, the governor chose not to reject the proposal because the Republican-controlled legislature would likely have overridden his veto. The ban will go into effect on May 7, when state or local government buildings will be fined $500 a day for displaying any flag other than the American flag, the Utah state flag, military flags or a handful of others approved by lawmakers. Political flags supporting a candidate or party, including MAGA flags, will be prohibited under the law. The new law could put the state and its largest city, Salt Lake City, at odds. City buildings in the city typically honor Pride Month each June by displaying flags that celebrate its LGBTQ+ population. Local leaders in Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County have illuminated the city and county buildings with rainbow lights each night since the bill was sent to Cox’s desk in protest of the legislation. BREAKING: Utah becomes the first state to ban LGBT ‘Pride’ flags and other “political” flags from being flown at state buildings. pic.twitter.com/PXD42e6DUk — Leading Report (@LeadingReport) March 29, 2025 Utah becomes first state to ban LGBTQ+ pride flags in government buildings and schools https://t.co/bgAqrVvtWk pic.twitter.com/KhrPDuM8Qz — New York Post (@nypost) March 28, 2025 From the Associated Press: Andrew Wittenberg, a spokesperson for Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall’s office, said their attorneys are evaluating the law and the capital city does not yet have information on what it will do once the law takes effect. The bill’s Republican sponsors, Rep. Trevor Lee and Sen. Dan McCay, said it’s meant to encourage “political neutrality” from teachers and other government employees. Opponents argued it aims to erase LGBTQ+ expression and take authority away from cities and towns that don’t align politically with the Republican Legislature. In a letter to legislative leaders explaining his decision, Cox said he agreed with the “underlying intent” of the bill to make classrooms politically neutral but thought it went too far in regulating local governments. He also noted that by focusing narrowly on flags, the law does not prevent other political displays such as posters or lighting. “To our LGBTQ community, I know that recent legislation has been difficult,” Cox said. “Politics can be a bit of a blood sport at times and I know we’ve had our disagreements. I want you to know that I love and appreciate you and I am grateful that you are part of our state. I know these words may ring hollow to many of you, but please know that I mean them sincerely.” Cox’s decision came hours after the Sundance Film Festival announced it was leaving its home of four decades in Park City, Utah, for Boulder, Colorado. The flag bill created eleventh-hour tensions as some residents worried it would push the nation’s premier independent film festival out of state. Festival leaders said state politics ultimately did not influence their move from conservative Utah to liberal Colorado. They did, however, make “ethos and equity values” one of their criteria in a nationwide search for a new home and referred to Boulder in their announcement as a “welcoming environment.”