A total betrayal.The post Biden Demands Israel Stop Attacking Hamas Even If It Doesnt Release the Hostages appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

So much for the lies.The post Consumers Knew Prices Were Rising‚ the Media Refused to Believe Them appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

Hundreds of migrants have arrived at Penn Station. They come via New Jersey to circumvent New York City laws. You can watch them here. It had calmed down for a few months‚ but theyre back. They will get 30 days of housing and then kicked to the curb. New York City officials have said that []The post Migrants Pour Into NYC via NJ as Randalls Island Explodes appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

If you eat meat‚ you must be a white supremacist with a white patriarchal‚ neo-colonialist culture. Everyone says it. Youre also racist. That hamburger you love comes with a dose of misogyny. Ignore all those sexy cows‚ sexy chickens‚ and sexy fishes who all just want to have fun. Meat eating is how gender-based structures []The post Wokey Explains How Meat and Men Oppress Us appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

A judge in Washington ruled that the states ban on magazines that hold more than 10 rounds is unconstitutional‚ but the state Supreme Court granted an emergency appeal to pause the judges decision‚ meaning the restriction stays in effect for now.On Monday‚ Cowlitz County Superior Court Judge Gary Bashor ruled in favor of a Washington gun shop that sued the state after lawmakers banned magazines holding more than 10 rounds in 2022. Bashor rejected the states arguments that the magazines were not suitable for self-defense and that the legislation was common sense.This Court must find there exists no set of facts where the Court can find such a generalized ban or restriction on an am (or an instrument that facilitates self-defense) as constitutional under the Washington Constitution‚ Bashor wrote in his 55-page decision. The United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights exist to define the outer limits of what Legislatures and Courts are allowed to do. Amending the Constitution and Bill of Rights cannot be done simply by enacting a law‚ or by a pronouncement from a Court.Bashor added that he found that large capacity magazines (LCMS) are classified as arms under the State Constitution and that members of the public commonly owned them for lawful purposes.The State has not provided evidence that LCMs are NOT commonly and lawfully owned or possessed by civilians for lawful purposes‚ including self-defense. The State: instead chose to provide expert opinions concluding only that LCMs are not commonly fired for self-defense purposes‚ or are not the best choice for self-defense‚ neither of which are relevant metrics‚ he wrote.Bashor‚ who has been a judge in the rural county since 2011‚ also pointed to the Founding Fathers in his decision.There was no appetite to limit gun rights by the Founders. Though the specific technology available today may not have been envisioned‚ the Founders expected technological advancements‚ Bashor wrote. The result is few‚ if any‚ historical analogue laws by which a state can justify a modern firearms regulation.After Bashors ruling‚ Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson‚ a Democrat‚ filed an emergency appeal before the states high court‚ arguing magazine capacity limits are constitutional.CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APPEvery court in Washington and across the country to consider challenges to a ban on the sale of high-capacity magazines under the U.S. or Washington Constitution has either rejected that challenge or been overruled. This law is constitutional‚ Ferguson said.Washington State Supreme Court Commissioner Michael Johnston sided with Ferguson‚ keeping the law in effect while the appeal continued.The magazine restriction was one of the many gun control policies adopted in recent years by Washingtons Democratic-controlled legislature and Democratic Governor Jay Inslee‚ including a ban on the sale of AR-15s and similar rifles.

A Democratic lawmaker proposed exempting black people from paying taxes as a form of reparations last week.Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas said on an episode of The Black Lawyers Podcast that a celebrity she could not remember who inspired her to look at exempting black people from paying taxes‚ according to the New York Post.I dont know that thats necessarily a bad idea‚ Crockett remembered thinking when she heard the proposal. One of the things they propose is black folk not have to pay taxes for a certain amount of time because that puts money back in your pocket.Crockett said that a tax exemption may be a more palatable reparations solution to get behind rather than actually giving out dollars. The shortfall is that the proposal would only help those black people who are currently paying taxes.If you do the no tax thing‚ for people that are already‚ say‚ struggling and not paying taxes in the first place Crockett said.Progressive Democrats have backed reparations as a way to pay black Americans for the United States history of slavery for years‚ though the proposal has failed to gain popular support. Even in deep blue California‚ nearly 60% of voters said they opposed such a policy. Just 28% of California voters support it‚ according to a September poll by the University of California Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies.Elected Democrats have continued to push the policy‚ however. In New York‚ Governor Kathy Hochul in December signed legislation creating a commission to study the issue. The bill set forth a nine-member committee tasked with examining the institution of slavery and making determinations regarding compensation.In January‚ Rep. Cori Bush (D-MO) called for reparations in a post on X. Bush said that the United States owes the descendants of slaves.CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APPOur country owes OWES a debt to the descendants of enslaved Black people‚ not just for slavery‚ but for what followed‚ like Black Codes‚ red lining‚ Jim Crow‚ and mass incarceration‚ she said. Thats why I introduced my Reparations NOW resolution. This country has an obligation.Aside from its unpopularity with Americans‚ reparations have faced other hurdles‚ such as questions over legality and who would qualify for the special treatment. Critics have said that such a policy would be racist against Americans who had nothing to do with the historic racism against black people.