A big shoutout to a reader (Mark) for sending me this video — also curses to you too! Why? Because the video was so good I was instantly hooked and couldn’t stop watching! So fair warning to you, don’t click in unless you have time to keep watching, because it’s super good and hard to click Pause! So the show is called SURROUNDED and the concept is Charlie Kirk shows up on a (far left) college campus and invites students in to debate him on multiple different issues. If the crowd thinks the student is losing, they raise their literal Red Flags and when enough Red Flags go up, that student has to leave the chair and whoever wins a race to claim the seat next gets to take the next shot. It’s fascinating! Watch here: Back up here if needed: WOW! Can 25 Liberal College Students Outsmart 1 Conservative? (feat. Charlie Kirk) pic.twitter.com/VzBdckG0n6 — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) September 10, 2024 Full Transcript: [Video Transcript] Charlie Kirk: Do you think men can give birth? Student 1: I think that’s a yes or no question. A person who is assigned male at birth… Charlie Kirk: So, people aren’t male at birth? Student 1: I think you need to see your evidence. This is why college is a scam, my friend. Charlie Kirk: Hello, everyone. I am Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, and I am surrounded by 20 woke college kids. My first prompt is: Abortion is murder and should be illegal. [Music] Student 2 (Juliana): Can we get our terms right first? Abortion is the forcible ending of the viability of a being in utero, otherwise known as a fetus. Do we agree that’s what abortion is? Charlie Kirk: Yes. Juliana: And murder is the intentional taking of life. It’s different from killing or sudden death. Murder would be the intentional taking of another life. Do we agree with that? Charlie Kirk: Yes. Juliana: And then we agree that murder, in general, in society, should be illegal? Charlie Kirk: Yes. Juliana: Okay, great. I’m a Catholic, so I think one important thing the Bible says is not to judge. Just going back to the topic, I think there’s a big difference between cells in utero and a living, breathing, existing being. While I do believe it’s murder — and that’s just my personal belief — I don’t believe in telling people what to do with their bodies. That’s not up to me, and it’s not up to us as Christians to judge. Charlie Kirk: Should we prevent murder in society? Juliana: For sure, yeah, it should be illegal. But I think it’s really different, right? Because, you know, these people aren’t… Sorry, nice to meet you. [Music] Student 3 (NAA): Can I just ask, at how many weeks do you think a fetus is viable? Charlie Kirk: Viability and moral worth are two different things. NAA: No, but I’m asking you, at how many weeks? Charlie Kirk: 20 weeks. A baby can survive outside of utero. NAA: Actually, it’s 24 to 26 weeks. Charlie Kirk: No, the youngest ever in a NICU unit actually happened in San Diego, not far from here, and survived at 20 weeks. NAA: So under Roe v. Wade, 93% of abortions happened in the first 13 weeks of pregnancy. That’s 93% well before a fetus is technically viable as a form of— Charlie Kirk: Let’s go into viability. What is it about, say, a six-week baby that has a heartbeat, its own DNA fingerprint, and brain waves that is of less moral worth than an 88-year-old with dementia? NAA: First of all, it’s not a baby; it’s a fetus. Charlie Kirk: What does fetus mean in Latin? NAA: I don’t know. What does it mean? Charlie Kirk: It means “little human being.” NAA: Your smile is very creepy. Charlie Kirk: Smiling is creepy? NAA: No, your smile specifically. But we’re losing track here. Charlie Kirk: Let’s go back to our terms. Can we agree that abortion is the forcible ending of a viability of a being in utero? Student 4: Actually, no. I’d like to refine our terms. I have two points to bring up after that. You defined murder as intentionally killing a human being. I think that’s a very poor way to define murder because if someone were to break into my home and point a gun at the heads of me and everybody I love, and I intentionally kill them to prevent them from killing my family, I don’t think I murdered them. So, I would define murder as the unjustified termination of a human life. Charlie Kirk: You’re making a good point. Let me further clarify then. Self-defense is very warranted. Student 4: Exactly. Right. Charlie Kirk: But I can see where you’re going to go with how that relates to abortion, but we can go down that journey in a second. Student 4: Yeah. Charlie Kirk: My next claim is: College is a scam. Student 5 (Maddox): Well, let’s define our terms. College, being traditional four-year college or university, not community college or technical college. A scam, if we can agree on a definition, is where a majority of people who go through the institution or business are not getting their money’s worth or time’s worth and are being deceived when they sign up. Do we agree on those terms? Charlie Kirk: Yes, perfect. Maddox: What do you think is the purpose of going to college? Charlie Kirk: The purpose of college should be a traditional liberal arts education — the pursuit of what is good, true, and beautiful. It should be the betterment of yourself and your soul, nurturing your character, and becoming a better citizen. At the very least, it should be preparing one for the job market. Do you think college does those things? Maddox: I think it does, but I would add that I think not only is it for the betterment of yourself, but for the betterment of society. We need historians; we need certain majors that may not make as much money. I think those are for the betterment of society. Would you agree? Charlie Kirk: It depends. Do you think getting a degree in gender studies is good for society? Maddox: I would agree, yeah. Charlie Kirk: Why? Maddox: Because studying gender helps us understand various identities and dynamics in society, contributing to broader social and cultural discussions. Charlie Kirk: Learning that men can give birth is not exactly a good use of time, is it? Maddox: Is that what they’re teaching in college right now? Charlie Kirk: According to the Center for Disease Control, they no longer say women can give birth; they say birthing person. Maddox: Do you think men can give birth? Charlie Kirk: Do I think men can give birth? I think that— Maddox: That’s a yes or no question. Charlie Kirk: I think a person who is assigned male at birth— Maddox: I don’t think they’re assigned male at birth. Charlie Kirk: So people are not male at birth? Maddox: I think that a person… See, your evidence that college is a scam, my friend. Charlie Kirk: So you think that studying gender is essential? Should we not deepen our understanding of these concepts? Maddox: First of all, I don’t think gender exists. I think there are two sexes, infinite personalities, and genders, however. Let’s get back to the core contention. College is a scam. Student 6 (Emily): It’s difficult to think about just one major like gender studies. Not everyone can be a doctor or a lawyer. Some people go to college and get a degree that they don’t end up using, but I don’t think that means college is a scam. Some people do end up using their degrees, and that’s important because we need educated professionals like doctors. Imagine if doctors just thought, “I think I can do it.” Charlie Kirk: Of course, doctors and lawyers need credentialing, but less than 5% of all people who go to college end up studying medicine or law. Most go into soft social sciences, communications, or the humanities. Emily: Are you forced to take classes that you think are a waste of time? Student 7 (Al): I do have to take some classes that are a waste of time, but it’s part of the broader education experience. It’s not a scam. High school was the same; you learn things you might not use directly in your career. Charlie Kirk: But high school is free. College isn’t. The majority of kids who go to college end up in debt. So, if they’re taking classes that are a waste of time, and they’re paying for it, isn’t that scammy? Al: I think it’s up to the person to make their college experience worthwhile by taking the right classes and making connections. Student 8 (Amanda): You keep saying that Kamala Harris is a DEI candidate and didn’t earn her position. Charlie Kirk: Kamala Harris was chosen because Joe Biden said he would pick a black woman as his vice president. Her qualifications weren’t the main reason for her selection. That’s the definition of DEI — choosing someone based on diversity rather than merit. Amanda: I don’t think that’s fair. DEI is about creating opportunities for people who have historically been marginalized. Kamala Harris has qualifications that made her a good candidate. Charlie Kirk: So, what is her greatest accomplishment? Amanda: She was a district attorney in Northern California and the Attorney General. Charlie Kirk: You mean overseeing San Francisco becoming a slum filled with crime and homelessness? Amanda: That’s not the full picture. She was a prosecutor and made impactful decisions. Student 9 (Mason): So, let’s discuss affirmative action. You believe it’s unconstitutional, right? Charlie Kirk: Yes, the 14th Amendment ensures equal protection regardless of race. Affirmative action gives an unfair advantage based on race, which violates that principle. Mason: But affirmative action exists to address generational inequalities caused by slavery and segregation. Without it, marginalized groups can’t catch up. Charlie Kirk: If that were the case, then why have Black Americans become poorer and more violent since the Civil Rights Movement? Mason: Because of systemic issues like mass incarceration, redlining, and continued discrimination. Charlie Kirk: The fact remains, 13% of the population commits 58% of the murders. That’s not systemic; that’s cultural. Mason: You’re ignoring the root causes — economic inequality, lack of access to resources, and targeted policies like the War on Drugs that specifically target Black communities. [The debate continues on topics of systemic racism, gender identity, and definitions of masculinity and femininity, culminating in a heated exchange about Kamala Harris and DEI policies in government and corporate America.] Charlie Kirk: Thank you all for this debate. I hope this sparks more conversations about these critical issues. [End of Transcript]

The paid pollsters are telling us this is a 50/50 race between President Trump and Kamala Harris. Some even say Kamala is leading! And yet, every “real world” poll shows the exact opposite. One by one, they’re all consistent and showing wins for President Trump in the 70-90%+ range! Here’s the latest…. A Philadelphia bakery near the location of tonight’s debate decided to sell RED Trump cookies and BLUE Kamala cookies as a sort of “poll” among their customers. NOTE: the poll was not completely unbiased, as this is a notable “BLUE” county in prior elections. So you might expect it to skew towards Kamala. Except…..? It didn’t. NOT. EVEN. CLOSE. Nope, with 4,228 cookies sold for President Trump and only 369 (!!) for Kamala, President Trump has a commanding 91.97% victory margin! Take a look: A Philadelphia-area bakery not far from where the debate is being held tonight is selling special Trump and Kamala cookies during election season. These are the total sales so far: Trump: 4,228 Kamala: 369 This is a blue county too pic.twitter.com/6r84U7jUqp — johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) September 10, 2024 Interestingly, this bakery has done this “informal poll” in each of the last 4 elections and their polling has accurately predicted the winner of the election in all but ONE year. Care you guess which one they (allegedly) got wrong? Of course, it was 2020. And I’m not sure sure they don’t actually have a perfect 4 for 4 streak: The bakery has hosted this informal poll since 2012, predicting the outcome of three of the last four elections. Their winning streak came to an end in 2020 when the final cookie tally put Trump in the lead with 31,804 cookies over Biden’s 5,750. If this isn’t undeniable proof… pic.twitter.com/pMjo83hT1k — AlphaFo? (@Alphafox78) September 10, 2024 Here is a picture of the tally on the wall showing the count: Full screen video player here: The bakery has hosted this informal poll since 2012, predicting the outcome of three of the last four elections. Their winning streak came to an end in 2020 when the final cookie tally put Trump in the lead with 31,804 cookies over Biden’s 5,750. If this isn’t undeniable proof… pic.twitter.com/pMjo83hT1k — AlphaFo? (@Alphafox78) September 10, 2024 I mentioned at the top this was NOT an isolated incident. In fact, I seem to be covering about one of these each day recently. Here are the most recent ones: HILARIOUS: The Krassensteins FACE-PLANT Again! (NEW Article, Not a Repeat!) No one ever accused the Krassenstein Brothers of being geniuses (or even just of being “smart”) but this is bad even by their standards! A couple of days I brought you a report on Ed Krassenstein posting this very biased poll on Twitter only to have it backfire right in his face with 72% of his followers (which you have to assume lean Democrat) saying they’re voting TRUMP! You’d think at that point you’d leave well enough alone, but what does Genius #2 in the Krassenstein family do? Brian says “hold my beer” — let me try! Famous last words. Here is Brian’s poll and below I’ll screenshot the results: Who are you voting for? — Brian Krassenstein (@krassenstein) September 8, 2024 As of press time for this article, the poll still has 2 days to go, but with almost 71,000 votes, it’s a near clone of brother Ed’s poll, which has TRUMP securing over 71% of the vote: Hey dunces, you can run these as often as you want, the results aren’t going to change. Actually, please do keep running them because you’re proving exactly what we all already know: the MSM and the “pollsters” are lying to us, claiming it’s a 50/50 race between Trump and Harris. It ain’t even close folks! Get out and vote like your life depends on it (because it does), but President Trump holds a COMMANDING lead if the truth were known. And that truth seeps out each time these guys run their polls. But it’s not just them…. Fellow “genius” Mark Cuban also face palmed, see his below: ANOTHER Far-Left Poll Backfires In Spectacular Fashion On Twitter! These Far-Left “influencers” must be gluttons for punishment because you’d really think they’d wise up and stop sticking their hand on the hot stove….but so far they haven’t. And for my selfish amusement, I hope none of them ever stop, because this is pure comedy! Also, it’s sending a massive red flashing warning to the world about how America REALLY leans politically and Spoiler Alert — it is NOT a near 50/50 tie between Trump and Kamala. Not even close. Nope, according to polls ran by the Far-Left Krassensteins, Kamala honk Mark Cuban, and even independent journo Sharyl Attkisson, the Country is united….under President Trump. Little Ed Krassenstein posted this poll today and blasted it out to his 1M Followers on Twitter. I don’t follow Ed because I couldn’t stomach all the BS, so it would be reasonable to assume that most of the people who follow him like and agree with him, which you’d think would make them Democrat Kamala Harris supporters. But to juice the results a bit, Ed labeled Kamala as “Prosecutor” and Trump as “Felon”. Very fair and balanced Ed! Who are you voting for in 2024? — Ed Krassenstein (@EdKrassen) September 6, 2024 But even with all of those things seemingly in his favor, the results as of press time of this article have 72.1% of people hitting the FELON button! And yours truly was one. That is with over 65,000 votes already taken, so it’s not as if it’s a skewed small sample. You just gotta love it! But as I said, this isn’t the first time this has happened. Let me show you two other gems… MUST SEE: Another Poll Backfires Spectacularly On Twitter In Mark Cuban’s Face! A few days ago, I brought you this report showing very surprising poll results from an “independent” former-CNN reporter. The results were not only not what you might expect but far greater than you might expect: MUST SEE: New Presidential Poll Ran By Independent Journalist Has STUNNING Result Today I want to show you something similar... Mark Cuban was feeling cute and thought he would post a poll pitting Trump against Kamala and he assumed that all of his followers of course thought exactly like he does (which is to said a Far-Left ideologue). Cuban presents himself as the "smartest guy in any room" and yet he keeps having bad takes about our country and politics.  REALLY bad takes. And he keeps getting proven wrong by the masses. This was just the latest example, but man is it glorious.... Instead of running a "who are you voting for" poll, Cuban thought he'd get better results by asking "Who's persona and character would you like to see young children grow up to have:" thinking that he'd get more Kamala votes that way. Turns out most of his followers have way more common sense than he does and they see that even thought President Trump might do "Mean Tweets" and might have some "locker room talk" from time to time, most of America identifies with him because he's genuine and real and has heart and true character -- despite what Mark Cuban and the MSM try to brainwash you to think. America sees right through it: Who’s persona and character would you like to see young children grow up to have: — Mark Cuban (@mcuban) August 31, 2024 Screenshot if needed: What a beautiful thing! Mark, phrase the question however you want, but American LOVES Trump. We think Kamala is a vapid, brain-dead FAKE and PHONY. Let me put it in basketball terms you might understand:  Scoreboard.  Look up at it. RELATED REPORT: MUST SEE: New Presidential Poll Ran By Independent Journalist Has STUNNING Result This is truly a must see.... First let me set the stage so you understand why I am so blown away by this. Let me introduce you to Sharyl Attkisson, an independent journalist with a pretty incredible career working in the heart of the belly of the "Mainstream Media" beast. I knew of her but didn't really know much about her until now. Here's her Twitter profile where she has over 500,000 followers (a very large following): The winner of 5 Emmys (no small feat) and a very impressive bio which includes working at CBS, PCB and CNN.  Here's a short bio: Sharyl Attkisson is a nonpartisan investigative journalist, five-time Emmy Award winner, and recipient of the Edward R. Murrow award for investigative reporting. She is the NYT bestselling author of Slanted: How the news media taught us to love censorship and hate journalism; The Smear: How Shady Political Operatives and Fake News Control What You See, What You Think and How You Vote, and Stonewalled. She is host, investigative reporter, and managing editor of the Sunday morning national TV news program, Sinclair’s “Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson,” which feeds to 43+ million US households each week and focuses on investigative and accountability reporting. Her new book, Follow the Science: How Big Pharma Misleads, Obscures, and Prevails can be pre-ordered now (Harper Collins 09/04/2024). For thirty years, Attkisson was a correspondent and anchor at CBS News, PBS, CNN and in local news. In 2013, she received an Emmy Award for Outstanding Investigative Journalism for her reporting on :The Business of Congress,” which included an undercover investigation into fundraising by Republican freshmen. She received two other Emmy nominations in 2013 for “Benghazi: Dying for Security” and “Green Energy Going Red.” Additionally, Attkisson received a 2013 Daytime Emmy Award as part of the CBS Sunday Morning team’s entry for Outstanding Morning Program for her report: “Washington Lobbying: K-Street Behind Closed Doors.” In September 2012, Attkisson received the Emmy for Outstanding Investigative Journalism and the RTNDA Edward R. Murrow Award for Excellence in Investigative Reporting for the “Gunwalker: Fast and Furious” story. As I said, an impressive bio, but what's more impressive to me for the reason I'm about to show you is this is not some Far-Right Fox News reporter. This is a former CNN reporter with an extremely mainstream following. And THAT is why this caught my eye so much.... Three days ago she asked her followers who they're voting for, and you might have thought it would be close to 50/50, right? After all, isn't that what the MSM tells us? They keep telling us it's tied or Kamala is even UP in some polls. And yet that's not how Attkisson's poll turned out. Not even close. 96% for Trump! Take a look: Who will you vote for now? — Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) August 25, 2024 Screenshot here if needed: Folks, this is not Don Jr. running a poll or even Elon Musk running a poll. This is an independent journalist, formerly with CNN. And it just can back 96% for Trump! I believe this poll. What about you? Can you say LANDSLIDE WIN incoming?

A former college wrestler who has been charged in connection to the murder of his girlfriend has claimed he shot her in self-defense because he “feared for his life.”

A new report highlighted by CNN says that in 2019, Vice President Kamala Harris supported cutting funds to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations and that she backed spending taxpayer dollars on gender reassignment surgeries for detained migrants and prisoners.