The late country singer Toby Keith’s daughter, Krystal Keith, delivered remarks at the University of Oklahoma’s commencement ceremony last week while accepting an honorary degree on his behalf. Keith died in February following a battle with stomach cancer.  “When he learned last fall that he was being inducted to Sooner Nation on this high of a level, he was so excited, and he was so proud,” Krystal said during her speech, per Fox News. Krystal went on to describe how her dad, an Oklahoma native, was devoted to the university, especially its sports teams, and was honored when he found out he’d be receiving the honorary degree. “I actually made a joke about how many hours I spent here getting my bachelor’s degree, and he joked that he didn’t have to work that hard to get his,” she continued. “But we all know he earned it and spent many more hours dedicating his life to earning it this way. He loved his family (he loved all of us), God, our country, and Sooner Nation.” “Throughout his life and career, he made sure to work hard to have the best, to be the best. He often said, ‘They may write better than me, they may sing better than me, and they may look better than me, but they will NEVER outwork me,’” Krystal said during her speech. “And that made all the difference. He was a larger-than-life legend, he was an icon, he did things his own way, his songs inspired nearly everyone in country music and beyond.” The country music legend’s daughter also discussed how proud her father was to be an American, a value he passed to his children. “He always said, ‘Never apologize for being patriotic,’ and practiced what he preached through his work with the USO [United Service Organizations],” Krystal said.  She also described his dedication to performing for the military. “He was going into the most dangerous zones, where guys that never got those entertainers to come to them, were housed and were sitting, and he would go and boost their morale. And that’s who he wanted to go see. We called him Captain America. And that’s something he earned.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP “My dad taught me everything: singing, writing songs and … most of what I know about life. And I hope the graduates that are here today can learn from him, too. He fought hard to live his dream,” Krystal said in conclusion. “He had faith and believed in himself. He never gave up the fight, even when the odds were against him. He would want me to tell you to never give up on yourself. As you start your next journey in life, know that you have strong roots here at the University of Oklahoma. Work hard and be the captain of your own ship. Believe in yourself and live your dream.” Keith was also posthumously inducted into the Country Music Hall of Fame after being selected for the honor days before his death. 

The homeless man who has been charged with stabbing a 36-year-old mom who was chaperoning a group of schoolgirls on a class trip in Times Square on Saturday has been arrested 14 times in the last 20 years, according to the New York Post. Times Square Tourist mom stabbed by maniac was leading school trip to NYC: ‘Don’t feel safe there’ https://t.co/t0jyOnWOi0 pic.twitter.com/kc4WxnHR3M — New York Post (@nypost) May 14, 2024 Amber Lohr, from western Pennsylvania, had just left a souvenir shop with her daughter and other schoolgirls when Cyril Destin, 61, seated at a deli at Eight Avenue and 43rd Street, jumped to his feet and allegedly stabbed her directly through her sweatshirt and into her chest. Lohr, with blood from her chest seeping through her sweatshirt, still kept her composure and made sure the children were safe before she told anyone she had been stabbed. A bystander then ran for aid; Lohr was treated on the sidewalk before she was taken to Bellevue Hospital. “My wife not only had taken the stabbing but should also be considered a hero by remaining in front of the children, coaching them to go backwards without turning around,” Lohr’s husband John told the New York Post, adding of the bystander, “Whomever she was, thank you.” He also thanked the “strong and fearless” schoolgirls for maintaining their composure and helping even though they were “scared out of their minds.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP “We don’t feel safe there,” John Lohr said of Times Square. “A guy with a very lengthy record went out of nowhere and attacked my wife by stabbing her into the chest and within inches of her life being lost. … This man could have murdered my wife or even worse, one of the children she was chaperoning.“To think I could have been planning a funeral rather celebrating my wife on Mother’s Day is sickening to me.” Destin reportedly lives in a homeless shelter across from the deli. He was charged with second-degree assault, along with fourth-degree criminal possession of a weapon. “This man will strike again and maybe the next person may not be as fortunate,” John Lohr stated. “I will not accept anything but the max sentence for him. This man doesn’t only need to be jailed but institutionalized permanently following his well-deserved lengthy sentencing.”

The images were created with artificial intelligence (AI) and Beyoncé did not attend this year's Met Gala. 

One played the prosecutor, the other Cohen

Calling all Patriots!

'Some do, others don’t, I do not'

A university concert pianist has made an unlikely nest for herself while she continues her studies: an old age home. While Beth Christensen studies piano at the University of Missouri-Kansas City Conservatory, she doesn’t have a dorm on campus, and instead lodges at Claridge Court, a senior living facility in the nearby town of Prairie […] The post Grad Student Trades Piano Performances for Housing at Senior Facility–Melting the Age Divide and Making Friends appeared first on Good News Network.

Blog short fiction Five SFF Stories Featuring Experiments With Unexpected Outcomes From time travel to arcane research, experimentation can lead to the most surprising results… By Ratika Deshpande | Published on May 14, 2024 Photo by Colin + Meg [via Unsplash] Comment 0 Share New Share Photo by Colin + Meg [via Unsplash] Science is all about trying to understand what we don’t know, often by tinkering with what we do know. As a student of Applied Psychology, I learned to design experiments and create hypotheses—A does (or doesn’t) cause B, X and Y are (or aren’t) correlated. Either way, certain outcomes were expected. But what happens when the outcome is something you never saw coming? Here are some stories that ask (and try to answer) this question… “How To Break Causality and Write the Perfect Time Travel Story” by Stewart C. Baker Writing is not easy, especially when you want to tell a story about time travel, something countless authors have tackled already in various brilliant ways. How do you get around this problem and create the best and most famous time travel story of all time? By time traveling, of course. Everything goes exactly as you wanted it to. Until it doesn’t. What do you do then? “The Truth About Woopy” by Liviu Surugiu Six-year-old Nabi is not afraid of shadows. He has a lot of questions about them, and Tom answers as many as he can, while trying not to wonder if it was a bad decision to encourage his kid’s interest in such things. He thought Nabi was trying to make shadows of animals, just like they saw a man do at the circus. But Nabi isn’t content with simply knowing stuff about light and shadow, so he sculpts them instead. And maybe, if he gets it right, he can make something that can’t exist. What is play for if not to make the things you imagine real? “White Charles” by Sarah Monette Miss Parrington keeps shipping her curious finds to an amateur historian at the museum. She means well, but most of what she sends doesn’t turn out to be useful, so our narrator ignores her latest parcel. Then a junior curator opens the crate, never getting a good glimpse at whatever it was inside before it flies into his face and escapes—recovering from the shock, he says it looked like a giant white spider. Now the question is, how do you recover something so enigmatic and something not quite…right? Monette has created an incredible atmosphere of dread in this story, while also exploring the results of magic gone wrong, and of the power of compassion. A thoroughly enjoyable read. “Dr. Polingyouma’s Machine” by Emily Devenport When Dr. Polingyouma turned on his time machine, both the creator and the creation vanished. It also caused The Effect, “an astonishing intersection of worlds” requiring regular cleaning of the overlap zone. It’s the kind of work on which the fate of the world depends, and requires not a janitor but a dedicated sanitation engineer like Harris, who risks going insane or dying on the job. After all, it is tempting to look at the people—entities—passing through and to poke around, and difficult to grapple with questions that can’t or won’t be answered. “Remaker Remaker” by Lucas J. W. Johnson Martin Fullius, a PhD in Engineering and Thaumaturgy and a freelance Remaker, is visited by a man from Rome who knows about his skills and his secret projects. He offers to provide Martin with everything he requires to work on his projects, in return for completing a job he needs done. It’s a request that goes beyond anything he has made before—hands and legs made from muscles and clockwork are no big deal for Martin. He needs to work hard, research, stretch his understanding of anatomy, and observe its workings. Both his patron and Martin know what he’s capable of. So when he fails, it comes as a surprise. Maybe he needs further research, a change of location. You can make anything if you try hard enough, right? …Right? [end-mark] The post Five SFF Stories Featuring Experiments With Unexpected Outcomes appeared first on Reactor.

Due to its unprecedented scale, political context, and destructive aftermath, World War II may well be the most significant period in modern history. And any argument making that assertion need only examine how much change it influenced throughout the world, even 70 years after it ended. But while these after-effects are countless, some never even learned what happened to those fallen soldiers and... Source

It’s an open secret that the Biden administration disdains lawful civilian gun owners almost as much as it does the lawful gun industry. But in case there was any doubt, new gun export regulations published late last month by the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security make the administration’s position painfully clear: It doesn’t think ordinary civilians can be trusted with firearms. The interim final rule on gun exports, published April 30, significantly alters licensing policies for U.S. companies seeking to lawfully export guns and ammunition to civilian markets in other countries. And although it doesn’t necessarily affect American gun owners, it does show the Biden administration’s true colors on the natural right of self-defense—but projected into the international arena. Here are four things to know about how the rule attacks the lawful gun industry and civilian gun ownership more broadly. 1. The rule on gun exports has been many months in the making. The Commerce Department’s rule on gun exports appears to be the end result of a much longer plan to attack the lawful gun industry by imposing more stringent processes for gun export licenses. Last fall, Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security issued a sudden, largely unexplained 90-day “pause” on issuing new export licenses for guns and ammo meant for foreign civilian markets, while keeping the process unchanged for exports to foreign governments. Despite congressional demands for answers, the bureau extended the pause for several more months even as leaked draft regulations made clear that the Biden administration was in fact looking to make life more complicated for exporters to legal civilian markets. 2. The rule creates a bureaucratic nightmare and expands U.S. world-policing efforts. Among the changes to export licensing rules are some that appear designed to do little more than impose arbitrary burdens on the lawful U.S. gun industry. For example, although U.S. companies currently obtain export licenses that last for four years, under the new rule they will be required to seek a new export license on an annual basis. Additionally, the Bureau of Industry and Security will revoke thousands of currently valid export licenses and require those businesses to reapply under new, more stringent application review processes.  This will inevitably result in licensees being perpetually entangled in bureaucratic red tape, as the Commerce Department agency now will have to process thousands of additional licenses every year without adequate staff, almost ensuring significant backlogs. Other changes found in the rule will increase the federal government’ efforts to police not only civilian gun markets in other countries, but also thousands of individual foreign citizens who legally buy American-made firearms in certain foreign countries. That’s particularly concerning for Israelis who buy U.S. gun exports, as it opens doors for the Biden administration to follow through on threats to their visas if they use firearms in self-defense against terrorists. 3. The rule wrongly blames lawful gun owners for criminal gun trafficking. It creates a list of over 30 countries for which export licenses to civilian end-users will be subjected to a “presumption of denial.” In short, exports to government entities in these countries, such as militaries and police forces, may continue as usual, but the Commerce Department bureau will presumptively deny applications to export guns to civilian markets in those same countries. Many of the countries are located in regions full of instability and notorious for both criminal gun violence and longstanding problems with government corruption, such as Central America, East Africa, and Southeast Asia. The Bureau of Industry and Security defends this change by claiming—erroneously—that firearms lawfully exported to civilians are more likely to be diverted into black markets than firearms lawfully sold to foreign militaries and police agencies. Here, BIS bites hook, line, and sinker into the international gun control narrative that, far from a human right to self-defense, there’s actually a human right to strict gun control. Apparently, the bureau believes even corrupt and inept governments are inherently more trustworthy with American-made guns than are ordinary civilians living under those governments. This is, in a sense, an international projection of the Biden administration’s stance on lawful gun owners in the U.S.—they’re always the ones to blame for criminal violence. In reality, just as studies on gun violence in the United States routinely show that lawful gun owners aren’t the major driving force behind criminal gun violence domestically, studies on crime, violence, and instability in other nations routinely point to government stockpiles and illegal imports—not lawful civilian purchases of legally imported guns—as the primary sources of criminal gun violence. Consider one recent comprehensive analysis of the illicit firearms trade, which asserted that “research in a number of [global] regions has found that military stockpiles are one of the most common sources of weapons” that end up in the hands of criminal actors and terrorists. This seems particularly true in the countries singled out by the new rule for a “presumption of denial” with respect to civilian exports. Contrary to BIS assertions that even corrupt governments are better able than civilians to secure their guns, a 2022 United Nations report on arms trafficking in East Africa concluded that “the diversion of firearms and ammunition from state stockpiles is a significant source of illicit firearms” in the region, “and is often facilitated by corrupt officials with access to weapons stores, including police and military stores, or others under the control of wildlife or custodial services.” Meanwhile, experts in Central American arms trafficking insist that a major part of the problem is “endemic uncertainty” over the inventories and security of state arsenals, and that “[government] weapons are often ‘lost.’” Those “lost” firearms often end up diverted to criminal elements. Other U.N. reports identify the largest sources of illegal firearms in Latin America as being “military and police stockpiles in Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala,” all three of which now have been blacklisted for civilian (but not government) exports. 4. The rule relies on half-truths and misrepresentations. Just as concerning as the Bureau of Industry and Security’s misplaced blame on lawful gun owners is its reliance on half-truths and misrepresentations to justify that blame. BIS relies on two government studies, one by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and one by the Government Accountability Office, both of which were conducted under a Biden administration that already has shown a propensity for trafficking in bad firearms data. Additionally, the GAO report is essentially an earlier and more time-limited analysis of the same data used in the ATF report, which assessed the origins of crime guns submitted by foreign governments to ATF for tracing. The Bureau of Industry and Security claims that these two reports show that “a substantial number of firearms recovered by foreign law enforcement agencies were lawfully exported from the United States,” including “nearly 20%” of crime-linked guns submitted for tracing in Belize, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras, all four of which the new rule puts on the “presumption of denial” list. But this characterization buries the lede: ATF admits in its report that “in many cases, trace requests are not submitted for firearms recovered in the four countries.” In fact, the government of Guatemala only submitted, at best, only 60% to 70% of all recovered guns used in crimes for tracing; the government of Honduras submitted trace requests for just 10% of recovered guns tied to crimes. In other words, lawful U.S. exports didn’t comprise “nearly 20%” of all crime-linked guns in those countries. Rather, the exports accounted for 19% of the 10% of guns for which Honduras requested a trace, and 19% of the 60% to 70% of guns for which Guatemala requested a trace, and so on. Moreover, the GAO report clarifies that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives lumps all U.S.-sourced exports into one category, regardless of whether they were exports to government or civilian end-users. So that number of 19% includes all lawful exports, including those exported to foreign governments for use by their military or police forces. Yet, despite the weight of the evidence demonstrating that this is largely a problem with government corruption and ineptitude, Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security flippantly places the blame squarely on the shoulders of civilian buyers. The alternative intuitively makes more sense, given how incredibly difficult it is for ordinary civilians to legally obtain firearms in many of these countries in the first place. In Papua New Guinea, for example, gun owners must obtain a license for every firearm, which will be issued only for “substantial cause” and expire after one year. Illegal possession of a firearm carries a sentence of up to 50 years in prison. Meanwhile, in Panama, applicants for a gun license must submit certification from a licensed psychologist verifying their mental and emotional stability, pass a drug test, and complete a government-certified shooting range exam proving proficiency with the specific type of gun for which the permit is sought. Additionally, for nearly a decade between 2011 and 2020, Panama’s  government imposed a complete ban on the importation of firearms for civilian use, causing the price even of used guns on the lawful civilian market to skyrocket to as high as $3,500 in U.S. currency. The civilian market in that country remains incredibly limited and expensive. Realistically, what reason is there to believe that gun exports to civilians in these countries are truly to blame for any illicit arms trafficking? Ordinary, law-abiding civilians who are willing to jump through incredibly expensive and time-consuming hoops just to possess a firearm—and who face lengthy criminal sanctions for minor missteps—typically are invested in acting responsibly and maintaining physical possession of their firearms. Now a bureau of the Commerce Department is willing to draw a conclusion contrary to all rationality and the best available evidence. Why? Because it simply cannot fathom that ordinary civilians are less at fault for international arms trafficking than corrupt and inept governments. Few seriously doubt that there are, at times, circumstances where U.S. security interests might require us to reevaluate and scrutinize gun exports to certain countries. In a sane world, we could have those discussions without fear that they’d devolve into bad-faith attacks on the merits of civilian gun ownership. Instead, we have an administration that believes, fundamentally, that only governments should be trusted with guns. And the administration is willing to push this narrative with as many manipulated half-truths as necessary to undermine civilian owners—apparently both here and abroad. The post 4 Things to Know About Biden’s Latest Attack on Gun Ownership and Firearms Industry appeared first on The Daily Signal.