On point, Shabbos ?

The world is getting darker. New York authorities are searching for a suspect who stabbed and set on fire a 77-year-old man and a 78-year-old woman. NYPD reported that the suspect entered teh victim’s home after asking them if he could charge his phone. After entering the home, the suspect viciously stabbed the man and woman and proceeded to set them on fire. New York City police are searching for the suspect who killed a 77-year-old man and a 78-year-old woman by setting them on fire in their Queens home, sources said. Read more: https://t.co/4Tvs9u3jMb pic.twitter.com/sqE1P2mV3D — ABC News (@ABC) September 9, 2025 ABC News reported more details on the tragic crime: New York City police are searching for the suspect who killed a 77-year-old man and a 78-year-old woman by stabbing them and setting them on fire in their Queens home, likely while searching for property to steal, sources said. Neighbors reported a man knocking on doors on Monday, asking to charge a cell phone, with at least one neighbor turning the man away before he approached the victim’s house, the sources told ABC News. Detectives believe they have identified the suspect, who has an extensive criminal record and was released from prison in 2023, sources said. Surveillance video showed the suspect knocking on the victims’ back door and the 77-year-old victim opening it and letting him in around 10:15 a.m., according to sources. Detectives believe the suspect spent five hours in the victims’ house, according to sources, likely searching for property to steal before setting it ablaze. Here’s a video of the suspect: BREAKING: Urgent manhunt for the killer seen here on video that burglarized a Queens NY home before tying up a 77-year-old man & 78-year-old woman and then setting them on fire. It’s Democrat run New York City so don’t be surprised if it’s a career criminal out on bail. pic.twitter.com/xtLdZGKn9L — Dapper Detective (@Dapper_Det) September 9, 2025 ABC 7 NY reported the 77-year-old man was tied up with bungee cords: Detectives recovered forensic evidence from the home in Bellerose that they will attempt to match from evidence collected during the suspect’s prior arrests. According to police, both victims were stabbed before the house went up in flames. The woman was found lying on the first floor. Accelerant appeared to have been poured on her body, starting the fire. The man was found in the basement where he was tied with bungee cords to a column supporting the house. He was also set on fire but that fire appears to have extinguished itself.

WARNING: this article is extremely graphic in nature.  Proceed at your own discretion.  That said, our mission is to print the truth and to shine light on darkness, so that’s what we’ll continue to do here at WLT Report. I’m sure by now you’ve seen the horrific reports of the young Ukrainian women stabbed to death in the neck. Where did this happen? Ukraine? Russia? Uganda? Haiti? No, North Carolina, USA. In case you missed it, here was our original report: BREAKING: Young Woman Senselessly St*bbed In The Neck On North Carolina Train (WARNING: Graphic) In that original report, the surveillance video cuts out and does not show the actual moment of the stabbing, nor does it show the immediate aftermath, it cuts to the sick attacker in another part of the train changing out of his blood-soaked shirt. Now we have the missing video which still does not show the exact moment of the stabbing but shows the immediate aftermath. And it's horrific. She appears to clearly be in shock, just sitting there holding her head until she bleeds out and loses consciousness. And no one else on the train even bothers to help! They're like NPC zombies, unclear if they are actual human beings or not! The whole thing will make your blood boil: NEW: New footage released by @masslivenews shows Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska looking up in horror, trying to process what had just happened to her after being stabbed. Zarutska was seen putting her face in her hands as she bled out. Heartbreaking. pic.twitter.com/zKVGQ5CNa5 — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 9, 2025 Backup here if needed: Horrific! No one should have to die like this: RELATED REPORT: BREAKING: Wikipedia Caught Trying To DELETE Page About Iryna Zarutska Murder This is going to make your blood boil... We have known for years that Wikipedia is extremely Far-Left leaning.  And that's putting it nicely. But they really took it to a new level with this one. When a page documenting the brutal and senseless killing of Iryna Karutska was published to Wikipedia, it was immediately flagged and marked for deletion. In case you missed this story (because there is a "MSM" full blackout) here was our original report: BREAKING: Young Woman Senselessly St*bbed In The Neck On North Carolina Train (WARNING: Graphic) Now check this out over at Wikipedia... Flagged for deletion: WTF? They're trying to delete this… pic.twitter.com/kY30qKHBnf — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 7, 2025 Because we just can't possibly cover this story, can we? The article doesn't meet your standards? Really? Why, because it showed a deranged black man stabbing a white girl in the neck and killing her? You know what, that goes against my standards too!  I don't think we should have that in our society, but ignoring it and sweeping it under the rug is not going to help. I confirmed by visiting the page myself and saw the same note: Wikipedia is clearly just following in the footsteps of the "MSM" which have had a complete blackout (no pun intended) of the story: 0 AP stories on this deadly attack0 PBS stories on this deadly attack0 NYT stories on this deadly attack 0 NPR stories on this deadly attack0 WSJ stories on this deadly attack0 BBC stories on this deadly attack 0 CNN stories on this deadly attack0 WAPO stories on this… pic.twitter.com/962qmFOBNm — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 7, 2025 Meanwhile, they can cover George Floyd 5,800 times... Trayvon Martin 1,100 times... The Maryland Man 56 times... But a dead white girl stabbed to death in the neck in a demonic attack by a black man? Can't cover that: George Floyd—5,897 Trayvon Martin—1,190 Kilmar Abrego Garcia—56 Daniel Penny—100 Iryna Zarutska—0 New York Times is propaganda. pic.twitter.com/042SZW0g3G — Liz Wheeler (@Liz_Wheeler) September 8, 2025 And when they finally do decide to cover it, if you count Axios as "MSM", this is the best they can do... Yeah, the "MAGA crime message" -- you're familiar with that? You know, the "MAGA crime message" where we say we are tired of living around these animals and we want them all off our streets! You guys wanted the mainstream media to cover Iryna Zarutska’s murder?! Well here it is! pic.twitter.com/B2cg4EdamW — Breanna Morello (@BreannaMorello) September 8, 2025 How about we start referring to you as the "MSM death cult" message? That sounds appropriate.

By now you’ve no doubt seen the viral clip of “Phillies Karen” yanking that home run ball away from a 10 year old kid and his hapless father. In case you somehow missed it, here was our original report: “Phillies Karen” Receives Major Backlash After Taking Home Run Ball From Young Child And surprisingly, to the best of my knowledge, the woman has not yet been identified. The Internet is almost undefeated, but somehow the woman seemingly is still un-identified. Yahoo News reports there have been a few mis-identifications though: As the video of her initial confrontation with Feltwell spread across social media over the weekend, online sleuths searching for the real “Phillies Karen” apparently misidentified her. “OK everyone, I’m NOT the crazy Philly Mom (but I sure would love to be as thin as she is and move as fast),” Cheryl Richardson-Wagner posted on Facebook Saturday. “And I’m a Red Sox fan!” A New Jersey school district also issued a statement saying that the woman in question does not work for the school system. “The woman identified on social media as ‘Phillies Karen’ is not, and has never been an employee of the Hammonton Public Schools located in Hammonton, New Jersey,” the district said in a Facebook post. “Anyone who works for our school district, attended as a student or lives in our community would obviously have caught the ball bare-handed in the first place, avoiding this entire situation!” Enter Blowout Cards, a major trading card retailer, who just made an offer to "Phillies Karen"... They're offering her $5,000 if she hands over the ball with an apology: From @TheAthletic: Blowout Cards, a major trading card retailer, made an offer to the Philadelphia Phillies fan who took a home-run ball away from a child after berating the boy’s father: $5000 if she hands it over with “I’m sorry” on it. https://t.co/kLKO7vxGgn — The New York Times (@nytimes) September 8, 2025 Here is their actual post and offer: Attention Karen :We will you pay $5,000 for the ball we only ask that you autograph it “I’m sorry “ pic.twitter.com/tDcbNs8cwxPlease share we would really like to get this ball to that young fan. — BLOWOUTCARDS (@blowoutcards) September 6, 2025 With all credit to BLOWOUTCARDS for the thought, I don't like it. The woman does NOT deserve $5,000. The boy already got much better gifts from the team and doesn't need this tarnished ball. Their heart's in the right place but I vote no deal! RELATED REPORT: Dad Reveals Why He Gave Baseball Back To “Phillies Karen” The father, who was yelled at by a woman at a Phillies game after getting a home run ball for his son, is speaking out why he ended up giving the ball to the unhinged "Karen" who yelled at him. In case you haven't seen the original video, take a look here: NEW: ‘Karen’ Phillies fan goes viral for berating a man for grabbing a home run ball and giving it to his son. The man, who was clearly startled, eventually gave up the ball to the woman. Staff at the game took note of the incident and gave the boy a goodie bag. It also appears… pic.twitter.com/8gZeipI2mJ — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 6, 2025 Another angle: The #PhilliesKaren is also not some feeble old woman. She had no problem climbing over that seat to go stalk that man down and scream at him in front of his child. pic.twitter.com/cPC2yv4ZRj — HURL-agel My Bagel (@HurlWorld) September 6, 2025 In the interview the father simply shared he didn't want the situation to esculate which is why he decided to give the ball to her. LAD Bible broke the interview down: A father has explained why he handed over a home run baseball he was about to give to his son to an angry baseball fan. Drew Feltwell had attempted to give his son a home run ball hit by Philadelphia Phillies' Harrison Bader during Friday’s game, which he said they were attending for their son, Lincoln's, 10th birthday, when a woman angrily confronted him. During an interview with NBC10, he insisted that he reached for the ball from the seats in left field, and as he walked away, a female fan 'in the seat behind' claimed it was hers. "I don’t know if she was standing up. Maybe?" he said. "But I was watching the ball from almost the bat to where it went into that seat and kind of jumbled around and I was already going in and coincidentally, as soon as I was going in, it stopped in one spot and I just picked it up." He said as he walked back to his family to give Lincoln the ball, the woman chased him down and demanded the ball back. Providing his version of events, he added: "I didn’t even see her walk up, and as she reached for my arm, she just yelled in my ear, ‘That’s my ball!’ like super loud. "I jumped out of my skin, and I was like, you know, like ‘Why are you here?’ you know, ‘Go away.’ And she’s like, ‘That’s my ball! You stole out of – those are from our seats.’ "And I said, ‘There was nobody in that seat,’ you know. She said, ‘That’s from where we were sitting,’ and she just went on and on." The father said he didn't want to make the situation worse as he 'pretty much just wanted her to go away'. "I don’t even remember what she said, it was, you know, a lot of eyes on us by that time and the ball was already in his glove and she just wouldn’t stop," Drew explained. Watch the full interview here:

I guess when you’re sitting down and chatting with a literal expert on the U.S. Constitution, you might as well ask the big questions. And with Trump2028 hats selling like hotcakes, the question du jour is whether or not President Trump could actually serve a third term. Or in the words of Bret Baier: Is the 22nd Amendment really “cut and dry”? Watch the short response here: In response to a yes or no question asking if the 22nd amendment is “cut and dry”? Amy Coney Barrett responds with “Well, you know, that’s what the amendment says.” pic.twitter.com/J5D24DBzT7 — Electoral Eagle (@ElectoralEagle) September 9, 2025 Holy crap she’s got a personality that makes a paper bag look charming! Talk about wooden and laconic! Since that clip was a bit short, this one is a little longer: Justice Amy Coney Barrett: Constitution’s Genius Lies in Flexible Generality for Modern Times Bret Baier: They want a living, breathing Constitution that changes. How do you respond to that? Barrett: The genius of our Constitution… I describe our written Constitution, is that… pic.twitter.com/6FvLzIU9O3 — Mr Producer (@RichSementa) September 9, 2025 TRANSCRIPT: And for the folks who say, “Well, the founders were dealing with completely different problems back then. They were not contemplating what a country could look like decades later. They want a living, breathing constitution that changes. How do you respond to that?” You know, the genius of our Constitution—and I talk about this in the book when I describe originalism, and describe our written constitution—is that it’s written at varying levels of generality. So sometimes it’s very specific. The president has to be at least 35 years old. But sometimes it’s very general. We’re protected from unreasonable searches and seizures. We have freedom of speech. And to have freedom of speech doesn’t mean that you only have freedom to pass out pamphlets in a town square. I mean, it means that you have freedom to be on broadcast news. Right, and the 22nd Amendment says you can only run for office for two terms. True. You think that that’s cut and dry? Well, that’s what the amendment says, right? You know, after FDR had four terms, that’s what that amendment says. Honestly, I think I’m dumber for hearing her answer. BORRRRRING! But you know what’s not boring? MY analysis. Because I’ve told you all along I know exactly how this is going to go, and actually to her credit she left the door wide open to this 100% playing out: Here’s Exactly How I Predict President Trump Will Get His Third (Fourth?) Term… We've been talking a LOT about a potential third (or would that be "fourth"?) term for President Trump this week. Yesterday I brought you this: President Trump Follows Up, Confirms He’s “Not Joking” About A Third (Fourth?) Term Now today we had this breakdown on legal options for how it could happen: Legal Analyst Explains ‘Loophole’ President Trump’s Lawyers Could Use for THIRD TERM (And Why He’s RIGHT!) What I want to do right now is break down exactly how I think this could actually happen. This is one of those articles you might want to bookmark and save, or maybe even print out.  I am going to do the same.  Because I have a feeling we might just be looking back on this in 2027 and 2028 and be stunned to see it play out before your very eyes. I want to be clear, this is pure (educated) speculation on my part.  Entirely speculation, but I cover these things for a living.  I live in this world and I feel like I have gotten to know President Trump very well over the past 10 years.  I know how he thinks and I know how he works. So here is my pure speculation on how I think this could play out and how I believe it's not far-fetched at all to believe President Trump could waltz into a third term. First, I'll tell you what I don't think is an option. I don't think parsing words in the 22nd Amendment is an option. There's a lot of speculation going around out there saying Trump's attorneys are parsing the language in the 22nd Amendment and focusing on the word "elected". The wording of the 22nd Amendment is actually quite clear and straight-forward. Here it is: Amendment XXIIPassed by Congress March 21, 1947. Ratified February 27, 1951. Section 1.No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term. Section 2.This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress. Some people claim a workaround would be that JD Vance would run and Trump would be his Vice President and then JD Vance, once elected, would step down and Trump would take office by succession, not by "being elected". I think that's extremely flimsy and quite frankly just noise to distract people. I don't buy it. Mainly because the 12th Amendment expressly prohibits exactly that scenario, key part again in red: Amendment XIIPassed by Congress December 9, 1803. Ratified June 15, 1804. The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; the person having the greatest number of votes for President shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. So I think that's all just noise, designed to get people off track.  Sleight of hand, if you will. What I actually think will happen is much simpler. The cleanest and most fool-proof way to get this done is to simply Amend or Revoke the 22nd Amendment. There's no serious legal argument that that wouldn't work.  There's a process for it.  We've used that process 27 times to create 27 Amendments to the Constitution.  It works and it's available. In fact, the last one is not that old, being passed in 1992. The problem here becomes the fact that it's extremely unlikely in our divided modern day Congress, because Step 1 is a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, which is extremely difficult right now. And then step 2 is approval from three-fourths of the state legislatures (currently 38 out of 50 states). So you can see the challenge. This is where I see the grand plan come into play.... I have always believed that President Trump and team caught the 2020 election steal in realtime.  I believe that data is safely stored, either with Space Force or somewhere else. I believe President Trump knew he needed to win 2024 organically, the real way, with such a big win that no one could question it. I believe he knew that trying to release the data on the 2020 steal too early would have fractured our country, so that's why he hasn't disclosed it yet. And quite frankly, even now our country is still quite divided. But....imagine in 2026, 2027 or even 2028 if the IRS has been shut down, the Country is roaring again, all the violent migrants have been deported, America is healing, people are happy again, our food has been made safe again thanks to RFK and we literally think and feel better because we're no longer eating toxins, our country is rich again, we have Bitcoin and crypto reserves, we have a Strategic Opportunity Fund making money for Americans and maybe instead of making you annual April 15th payment to the IRS, maybe we all get a dividend check from the Opportunity Fund? Imagine THAT reality. Imagine a reality where even his haters have to say they've never seen America so strong. We are seeing the earliest of inklings of that happening with things like Bill Maher having dinner with President Trump at the White House. Folks, it's possible...I can see it!  I can see it in my mind very clearly. Now....imagine we're living in that reality and President Trump comes on TV suddenly one day to hold an emergency press conference. "My fellow Americans...." And then he rolls it all out.  The evidence of the 2020 steal.  Clear as day.  Irrefutable.  America is stunned as the reality sets in.  All of the information is sourced, verified and posted online for all to inspect. In the following days, his toughest critics examine it only to find its clear and indisputable. And then the reality sets in.... People start to piece it all together in their heads.  He's had this in his back pocket since 2020!  He didn't try to stay in power or remove Joe Biden.  He let the legal process play out.  He didn't want to send this country into a Civil War so he held it all back.  He dodged an assassination, he dodged four lawfare cases, and he won 2024 fair and square.  And now he's literally saved America and made us prosperous again!  Healthy again!  Safe again!  Rich again!  Happy again! That's exactly the moment that I believe there will be such a strong groundswell of support of people saying "this man was cheated out of a term in 2020.  He's done more than any other President, probably even more than Lincoln and Washington.  He deserves another term." I believe the people will also demand it of the politicians. And that's when I believe there will be such a groundswell of support that reaching those thresholds for a Constitutional Amendment will no longer look daunting. I believe we will roll right through them and you'll be looking at a new 28th Amendment and you'll be looking at President Trump for 2028-2032. Of course he'll have to run again and win, but I think that will also be the time when you'll see the first President to win all 50 states. Ronald Reagan came close, winning 49 out of 50, but I think you'll see the full 50/50 go red for Trump in 2028. So there you go! That's my theory and I'm putting it out there, putting it on paper for the whole world to see April 2, 2025. Check back with me in the future and let's see how I do, ok?

URGENT: Check out this riveting, never-before-seen interview with a former CIA officer… Someone who spent years tracking America’s greatest threats… And now is a high-level White House insider – someone who, through the right channels, can get the President’s attention quickly. In the video, he drops a bombshell opportunity: He believes Trump and his administration are about to launch a new initiative to fund the next phase of Artificial Intelligence. It’s out of control what this new kind of Artificial Intelligence can do… That’s why Trump and his administration want to make sure nobody else but America gets their hands on it. And, according to this insider, Trump’s preparing to unleash an estimated $2.2 trillion into a group of little-known companies aimed at developing it ASAP for the U.S. If you were to look at it purely from an investor’s perspective… This is like getting a second crack to invest in those Cold War defense contractors who soared by 5,000 to 10,000% in the two decades after World War II… Except this time, there’s a specific timeframe: as soon as October 15. That’s when this former CIA officer believes the estimated $2.2. trillion will begin flowing. Listen, if you missed the crazy life-altering gains over the past decade from Bitcoin… or Amazon, Google, Apple, or Nvidia… This could be your next shot. DON’T miss this one too… Click here to watch the full interview now. (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!)

I questioned whether I wanted to give this lady any attention and maybe I shouldn’t have, but I just couldn’t resist. This has got to be one of the most classic Far-Left, Woke, Victim-mentality quotes of all time. Here is the direct headline from Yahoo News: More here: Read “My boyfriend is a tennis star — and being the only Black woman in the stands bothered me” on SmartNews: https://t.co/sXvrwp4Pnu — Kevin L. Rice (@LewiskRice1) September 5, 2025 And here’s a portion of the Yahoo News article for context — if you can stomach it: Ayan Broomfield is more than a WAG (a wife/girlfriend of an athlete). Yes, she’s the longtime girlfriend of American tennis star Frances Tiafoe, who she first started dating in 2015. But she’s also a former NCAA tennis player in her own right and someone who has taken her transition to the stands seriously. Traveling to Tiafoe’s tournaments across the globe opened Broomfield’s eyes to a lack of diversity in the tennis community. At the 2025 Australian Open, she noticed that it was difficult to find other women of color in the crowd. She made a TikTok pointing out the issue and then decided to do something about it. That “something” is Ayan’s Aces, Broomfield’s initiative focused on bringing diversity to tennis. In March, she hosted a suite at the Miami Open for a group of Black female creators. At this year’s U.S. Open, she hosted two more, doing her part to make the stands feel a little more inclusive. Speaking to Yahoo’s Kerry Justich, Broomfield shares in her own words why representation on and off the tennis court matters — and how being a modern-day WAG has provided her with a chance to make a difference in the sport. I played junior tennis in Canada, so I did the whole junior Canadian tennis tour, and I never really saw [a lack of diversity] as this apparent issue. It was really when I started traveling with Frances a lot more. There’s a huge discrepancy between women of color on the court and women of color off the court, in the stands. Earlier this year, at the Australian Open, was when I really, really felt like this was an issue. I went on social and made a little TikTok about it. I wasn’t expecting anything from it, but it actually created such an amazing community that had such amazing feedback from so many women who were interested in it. I realized that there was a hole here that needed to be filled and that I have the ability to help fix it and try my best to put more women of color into seats at tennis tournaments. It’s an incredible sport, and everyone should have the ability to access it. Representation off the court Representation matters on both ends. For the fans and people coming to the tournament, being able to walk into the stadium and see people who look like you makes you feel comfortable. It makes you feel like you belong and that you’re seen. There are also plenty of women of color competing at the highest levels on court. You have Naomi [Osaka], you have Coco Gauff, and I’m sure for them as well, being able to look up in the stands and see other women of color cheering for them and being a support system for them is probably incredible. Players have to deal with so many stresses on the court, so having that community of women to look up to in the stands or just around the site or stadium is probably an incredible feeling. We’re building a really, really amazing community of women. Hearing everyone’s stories about how they got into tennis or why they wanted to come to the tennis tournament, it’s really heartwarming. It’s something that I’m really proud of, and I just hope that we can continue to work with these tournaments and work with these brands. Ok, now my thoughts… What utter nonsense! This woman is dating a Tennis star, attending the events, living the high life, clearly based on the photos in the article and on her YouTube channel living a very elegant and expensive lifestyle, but she’s TRIGGERED by being the “only black woman in the stands”. First of all, I doubt that’s even true. Just more liberal exaggeration and whining. Second, how these people (and by “these people” I clearly mean triggered liberals) — how these people can even get through a day being TRIGGERED by seemingly everything in life is stunning to me: I mean, it must really be awful living in that kind of headspace. Third, why is EVERYTHING constantly about race with these people? And by “these people” I mean, well, see above. I prefer to live in a world spoken about by a Reverend who once said this: “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” That’s the world I live in. Judge people by the content of their character, not by their skin color. But with these people, all they can see is skin color! To quote and paraphrase another famous person, Mr. Haley Joel Osment: “I see white people everywhere!” Spoiler alert: he’s been dead the whole movie.  I hope I didn’t ruin it for you, but it’s been 26 years. MEMO TO AYAN BROOMFIELD:  I guess white people like tennis.  You like tennis.  You’re all there together.  What’s the problem? And can I ask a question? If you do have a problem with that, does that make YOU the racist? Are white people not allowed to watch tennis? How incredibly stupid!

The Department of Justice has weighed in on the tragic stabbing of a 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee in Charlotte, North Carolina. The DOJ announced on Thursday that Decarlos Dejuan Brown Jr. will face federal charges in the brutal murder of Iryna Zarutska. AG Pam Bondi hinted Brown will more than likely face the death penalty after she shared the DOJ will seek the “maximum penalty”. Fox News broke the DOJ’s big announcement: Federal authorities announced Tuesday that Decarlos Dejuan Brown Jr., the suspect in the stabbing death of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train, has been federally charged with one count of committing an act causing death on a mass transportation system. Attorney General Pam Bondi said that the DOJ will seek the maximum penalty for Brown, saying that the Aug. 22 attack was a “direct result of failed soft-on-crime policies that put criminals before innocent people.” “I have directed my attorneys to federally prosecute DeCarlos Brown Jr., a repeat violent offender with a history of violent crime, for murder,” she said. “We will seek the maximum penalty for this unforgivable act of violence — he will never again see the light of day as a free man.” “The brutal attack on Iryna Zarutska on the Charlotte light rail was a disgraceful act that should never happen in America,” FBI Director Kash Patel said. “The FBI jumped to assist in this investigation immediately to ensure justice is served, and the perpetrator is never released from jail to kill again. I want to thank Attorney General Bondi for her pursuit of today’s federal charges, which are the first step toward delivering justice for Iryna and her family – as well as the millions of Americans who deserve to live in our great American cities free from being targeted by violent criminals.” Iryna Zarutska was a young woman living the American dream — her horrific murder is a direct result of failed soft-on-crime policies that put criminals before innocent people. I have directed my attorneys to federally prosecute DeCarlos Brown Jr., a repeat violent offender with… — Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) September 9, 2025 CBS Austin reported had a lengthy criminal past: The suspect accused of stabbing a Ukrainian refugee on the lightrail in Charlotte, North Carolina, has a long criminal record dating back to 2011. Decarlos Brown Jr., 34, was taken into custody Thursday and charged with first-degree murder for killing a 23-year-old woman on August 22. Brown is currently under a ‘no bond’ order. Brown has been arrested at least 14 times, on account of felony larceny, robbery with a dangerous weapon, assault, shoplifting and making threats, according to documents reviewed by the New York Post. WSOC-TV reported that the suspect is homeless, having previously served a five-year sentence for robbery with a deadly weapon in 2014. Director of the FBI Kash Patel also chimed in: The brutal attack on Iryna Zarutska was a disgraceful act that should never happen in America. The @FBI immediately surged into action to ensure justice is served and to make clear that violent criminals will never be allowed to walk free again. President Trump is committed… pic.twitter.com/0mq30pD0xS — FBI Director Kash Patel (@FBIDirectorKash) September 9, 2025 Full post: The brutal attack on Iryna Zarutska was a disgraceful act that should never happen in America. The FBI immediately surged into action to ensure justice is served and to make clear that violent criminals will never be allowed to walk free again. President Trump is committed to restoring safety to every American city, and I want to thank  AG Pam Bondi for delivering the federal charges that will hold this perpetrator accountable.

The U.S. military’s most advanced weapons just failed in spectacular fashion against an unidentified object—an incident now raising new questions about what the Pentagon knows and why the public has been left in the dark. [...] The post U.S. Military Fires Hellfire Missile at ‘Mysterious Orb’—It Bounces Off, Leaving Lawmakers Stunned appeared first on The People's Voice.

Sweden’s newly appointed Health Minister, Elisabet Lann, shocked viewers after suddenly collapsing during a press conference — toppling to the floor along with the podium as she was introduced to her new post. Mainstream media rushed [...] The post Sweden’s Fully Jabbed Health Minister Pushing Boosters Collapses Suddenly on Live TV appeared first on The People's Voice.