Flip Flop and You Don't Stop: Kamala Harris Was Against the Border Wall Before She Was For It

The Meta Oversight Board has come forward with conceivably its most hypocritical ruling since its creation. The board ruled on Wednesday that the phrase “From the River to the Sea” is allowed on Meta-owned social platforms, despite its anti-Semitic implications. The expression is used by terrorist organizations and radical Islamists to advocate for Jewish genocide and the abolishment of the nation of Israel. This decision exposes a glaring double standard in the board’s ruthless approach to so-called hate speech, particularly posts about policies relating to transgender and non-binary individuals. The board has advocated for the shielding of LGBTQI+ groups from online free speech to such an extent that it included them among its seven strategic priorities.  Flashback: Globalist Meta Oversight Board Absurdly Lists ‘Gender’ Among ‘Seven Strategic Priorities’ Since its inception in 2020, the board has scolded Meta for not doing enough to censor content deemed detrimental to LGBTQI+ policy priorities; pressured Meta to expedite the censorship of content falsely linking the spread of COVID-19 to Asian Americans; and upheld the infamous suspension of then-President Donald Trump after Jan. 6 for allegedly violating Meta’s Community Standards on Dangerous Individuals and Organizations. However, the board’s concern for those who it described as marginalized or vulnerable individuals went out the window when it came to Jewish people.  The board ruled that users sharing posts or comments containing the phrase “From the River to the Sea” do not violate Meta’s rules on “Hate Speech, Violence and Incitement or Dangerous Organizations and Individuals.” The phrase, the board bafflingly claimed, simply shows “solidarity with Palestinians.” The decision stemmed from three Facebook posts that featured the genocidal phrase. The board specifically contended that the posts contained “no language calling for violence or exclusion” and did “not glorify or even refer to Hamas, an organization designated as dangerous by Meta.” The board’s rule left many perplexed given the phrase’s genocidal origins, which some trace to the 1960s. The phrase — which is embedded in the constitution of Hamas, the foreign designated terrorist group behind the Oct. 7 attack on the nation of Israel — calls for the establishment of a Palestinian state from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, essentially advocating for the destruction of the Jewish state. Critics, including Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA), swiftly denounced the board’s refusal to apply its standards against hate speech concerning the infamous phrase. “F*ck that,” Fetterman commented on X. “It’s blatant antisemitic hate speech calling for the elimination of Israel from the map.” MRC Free Speech America Vice President Dan Schneider had a different take. He said, “The oversight board got this wrong in two different ways. First, the phrase used by anti-Israel terrorists is obviously hateful. There’s no getting around that genocide is motivated by the most vile kind of hate.”  Schneider, who is Jewish, continued, “But the board incorrectly assumes that speech opposing sex-change operations for minors is also hateful. The right answer about when to allow the free expression of ideas is to allow and encourage more of it. Censoring some political discussions but allowing others never turns out well.” Conservatives are under attack. Contact your representatives and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency, clarity on hate speech and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored, contact us using CensorTrack’s contact form, and help us hold Big Tech accountable.

Trump-loathing liberals were delighted when New York Times publisher Arthur Gregg Sulzberger wrote a long op-ed in The Washington Post attacking Donald Trump as a threat to press freedom. Start with Sulzberger-coddling Brian Stelter:  NYT publisher A.G. Sulzberger is out with a crucial new essay about risks to press freedom. Read it: https://t.co/ezBi68doY7 pic.twitter.com/31eN7zHtfL — Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) September 5, 2024 The headline? How the quiet war against press freedom could come to America Some foreign leaders have ruthlessly curtailed journalism. U.S. politicians could draw from their playbook. Sulzberger compared Trump to the leaders of Hungary, India, and Brazil.  "As they seek a return to the White House, former president Donald Trump and his allies have declared their intention to increase their attacks on a press he has long derided as “the enemy of the people," he wrote. This article essentially argues Trump is the enemy of the people, a consistent leftist-media theme. He then quotes from Trump making threats of having them "scrutinized." Sulzberger and others equate scrutiny or criticism of the press with somehow undercutting freedom of the press. So using your First Amendment right to say "The New York Times is a leftist rag" is somehow against the First Amendment. Sulzberger preposterously claimed he believes in "independent journalism," recounting the words of his great-great grandfather Adolph Ochs saying the times would report "without fear or favor." Anyone who thinks the Times doesn't favor the Left isn't reading the Times. He proclaimed:  As someone who strongly believes in the foundational importance of journalistic independence, I have no interest in wading into politics. I disagree with those who have suggested that the risk Trump poses to the free press is so high that news organizations such as mine should cast aside neutrality and directly oppose his reelection. It is beyond shortsighted to give up journalistic independence out of fear that it might later be taken away. Okay, so "I have no interest in wading into politics, but this Trump guy is a danger to freedom of speech." So that would suggest "don't vote for Trump." The Times has officially opposed Trump. They've endorsed every Democratic nominee for president since JFK in 1960. That's "neutrality" and "independent journalism" for you. So what about Biden and Harris? Biden has never granted an interview to Sulzberger's paper since he became president. Yeah, that's unfortunate, Sulzberger says, but he's for the free press in his rhetoric, if not his behavior:  Every president since the country’s founding has complained about the pesky questions of reporters who seek to keep the public informed. This includes President Joe Biden, who spoke glowingly about the importance of the free press but whose systematic avoidance of unscripted encounters with independent journalists has defied long-standing precedent and allowed him to evade questions about his age and fitness. But "Trump stands out for his aggressive and sustained efforts to undermine the free press." Trump operates on a transactional basis: You come after me, I come after you. But the press arrogantly proclaim themselves to be the most essential players in democracy, even as they seek to rig every election with their biased output. PS: Sulzberger knows his paper emptied a dump truck or two on the Hunter Biden laptop. As I wrote shortly after the 2020 election:  Add the spin in The New York Times front-page headline the Sunday before Election Day: "Foiled Once, Giuliani's Team Peddles More Dirt." There were three photographs in the story: one of President Donald Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani, one of former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon and one of Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui. The story focused much more on their machinations than on Hunter's. One could just as easily demonize the daily output of The Times in a similar way by referencing The Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger in a headline: "Foiled in 2016, Sulzberger's Team Peddles More Dirt on the Trumps."

Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Walz was subpoenaed for records related to a $250 million alleged fraud scheme during the pandemic. The massive fraud scheme involved funds being paid out to a nonprofit called "Feeding Our Future" that claimed to be set up to help feed poor children in Minnesota but instead apparently stole millions to enrich the plotters. 'The Committee today is proceeding with a subpoena to compel responses.' House Education and Workforce Committee Chair Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) says that Walz, who is the governor of Minnesota, was unresponsive to a request for information about the alleged scam. Although some documents have been produced for the committee, Foxx says that they were not produced in a timely matter nor did they answer her questions about Walz's oversight of the program. A U.S. attorney charged 70 people in relation to the scam in 2022, and to date, five individuals have been convicted of fraud. Others are awaiting trial on charges including bribery, wire fraud, conspiracy, and money laundering. Officials say that the stolen money was used to buy real estate, luxury cars, and other illegal purchases. An audit found that Minnesota's Department of Education failed to catch warning signs of fraud from the nonprofit and didn't force organizers to meet program requirements. “After MDE, under Governor Walz, failed to respond to previous attempts by the Committee to garner information necessary to uncover how the Governor and the USDA allowed such fraud to occur, the Committee today is proceeding with a subpoena to compel responses,” wrote Foxx. "This was an appalling abuse of a federal COVID-era program," read a statement from a Walz spokesperson to Axios. The Axios report said that some Republicans are uneasy about the subpoena because of the possibility of political backlash from the appearance of political motivation. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Public intellectual Cornel West lambasted the Democratic Party after party members were forced to table a bill on reparations in California. State Democrats have commissioned a panel to investigate the possibility of reparations for black residents for systemic racism in the past, but when Republicans forced them to actually pass a bill, they balked and tabled the motion.'The politicians are too pre-occupied with finding some position or status on the Democratic party plantation!'West, who is running for president, torched the black caucus in California and demanded political courage to pass the controversial measures. "What we are witnessing in the state of California is the very essence of political cowardliness," said Cornel West on social media, "in regard to the reparations bill which should have been signed by the governor, and that now is not just being delayed, primarily by the black caucus, but put off, postponed, with another commission, another investigation. That's the last thing we need. We need action!" West also referred to claims that the black caucus tabled the bill because it was afraid Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom would veto the measure. "The governor is too obsessed with his presidential ambitions, and the politicians are too pre-occupied with finding some position or status on the Democratic Party plantation!" he continued. "Please! We had enough of this! Where is your moral consistency? Where is your political courage? That's what we're looking for!" he added. The fight over the reparations bill devolved into a shouting match after protesters assembled at the legislature to demand that Democrats press forward on reparations. Some said that they would withhold support for presidential candidate Kamala Harris, who is from California, over the decision. “The governor needs to understand the world is watching California and this is gonna have a direct impact on your friend Kamala Harris who is running for president," said a black protester at the California capital. In 2022, the reparations task force said that black descendants of slaves were owed $569 billion in housing reparations. West has claimed to be philosophically a Marxist and a Christian. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The Democrat Party and its media allies are hell-bent on convincing the American people that it’s Trump and the Republicans who are racist. But Mark Levin thinks a history lesson is due. - YouTube www.youtube.com “The Civil War was fought between the North and the South, the Confederacy and the Union, between the Republican Party and the Democrat Party. The Democrat Party was the party of slavery; its generals after the Civil War formed the Ku Klux Klan,” which “was always an appendage to the Democrat Party,” he says. Later, “it was the Democrat Party that supported segregation,” he continues, pointing to Plessy v. Ferguson, during which a Democrat administration determined that separate but equal was equal, as an example. Levin also points to Democrats’ great hero — Franklin Roosevelt — who refused to sign a bill that would have outlawed lynching because it would have cost him Democrat votes in the South. “Woodrow Wilson — another horrendous segregationist and racist — he resegregated the military, resegregated the Civil Service after Taft and Roosevelt had desegregated them,” he reminds, adding that Wilson also “required that people provide a photograph with their applications for jobs” because “his order would not hire black people.” “That’s your Democrat Party,” says Levin. To hear more about the history of the Democrat Party and how it’s changed over time, watch the clip above. Want more from Mark Levin?To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The tomb belonged to Khuwy, a nobleman whom archeologists believe may have been related to the ruling pharaoh, Djedkare Isesi. The post Archeologists Discover Incredible Artwork Inside 4,300-Year-Old Egyptian Tomb appeared first on All That's Interesting.

An elderly woman from Romania unwittingly used a seven-pound Rumanit amber nugget worth more than $1 million as a doorstop for decades before her death in 1991. Years later, her relatives discovered the stone's true value. The post Romanian Woman’s Doorstop Turns Out To Be A Chunk Of Amber Worth $1.1 Million appeared first on All That's Interesting.

WOMP WOMP: Adding Tim Walz to the Ticket Has HURT Kamala in Minnesota

Joe Rogan Goes Nuclear on NY Times for Calling the Constitution ‘Dangerous’