“Morning Joe” host Mika Brzezinski raised the specter of the January 6 riot on Capitol Hill during Tuesday’s broadcast‚ saying that as they devolve into chaos and violence‚ the anti-Israel protests on college campuses have taken on the same look. Brzezinski addressed the issue with her guest‚ the Anti-Defamation League’s Jonathan Greenblatt‚ who said that anti-Semitism has risen dramatically on college campuses as the protests grow into “Gaza Solidarity Encampments.” In some cases — a few of which have been caught on video — masked protesters have physically blockaded Jewish students and refused to speak with reporters. WATCH: Morning Joe says the student protests are reminiscent of January 6: &;quot;This does look like January 6th. What a terrible example for our students.” pic.twitter.com/9v0296agsZ — Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) April 30‚ 2024 Brzezinski‚ upon viewing footage of some of the protests‚ made the connection to January 6. “That’s the place we’ve all been sitting in‚ watching this‚ going‚ ‘What the hell is going on&;#63; What are these universities doing&;#63; Why aren’t they doing something&;#63;’ And I’ll echo the horror that this does look like January 6th. What a terrible example for our students‚” she said. Brzezinski went on to warn that if they persisted in such actions — especially if things escalated to more vandalism and even violence — the students risked throwing away everything they’d worked for in getting to college‚ as universities have begun to threaten protesters with suspensions and even expulsion. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP “I think these college students obviously are missing the part where they need to see what’s going on across the country with these protests‚ that it’s now in the realm of violence‚ it’s in the realm of hatred whether some are peaceful or not‚” Brzezinski continued‚ suggesting that they engage in debate on the issues rather than participating in protests and violence. “They need to watch the news and look at all the different arguments and be adults or start learning to be adults.” Brzezinski is not the first to draw a comparison to January 6. Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo made the point several days earlier‚ wondering why people were not as angry about the anti-Semitic protests as they had been about the Capitol riot. WATCH: Maria Bartiromo wonders why people aren't as upset about demonstrations at Columbia as they are about January 6 pic.twitter.com/V4poC5Nyyx — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) April 23‚ 2024

A “mob descended” on journalist Ami Horowitz when he brought an American flag into the anti-Israel encampment at the City University of New York‚ yet he was the one who ended up detained by the police‚ he tells The Daily Wire. Horowitz says that he was attacked by the pro-Hamas mob three different times and was detained and questioned by police‚ all while his attackers were allowed to continue occupying the campus‚ undisturbed by the authorities. “Before I had a chance to even wave the flag – I just took it out – this mob descended upon me‚” Horowitz told The Daily Wire‚ explaining that more than a dozen people joined in on the “brutal” and “crazy attack.” “It began with punches to the torso‚ to the kidneys‚ and one to the private parts‚” he said. “I ran back a second time‚ they grabbed me again. This time there weren’t any punches thrown‚ but two guys grabbed me in an armlock and dragged me off the property‚ threw me down. I went back in a third time‚ this time more punches were thrown‚ one to the throat‚ a headbutt. We grappled a whole bunch.” Journalist @AmiHorowitz went to @CUNY with an American flag. Immediately‚ violent extremists stole his flag and assaulted him. The police detained him‚ and ordered him not to return to the protest with his “different views.” pic.twitter.com/YVa2AWzrYo — Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) April 30‚ 2024 Once authorities intervened‚ however‚ it was Horowitz‚ not the attackers‚ who was detained. “Security and the police showed up and then they detained me‚ which I thought was very odd‚” Horowitz told The Daily Wire‚ saying he was told he would be arrested if he returned to the campus with or without a camera. Audio obtained by The Daily Wire reveals police justifying their actions. An officer told Horowitz after he was detained that they were “trying to give these kids a space to protest peacefully.” When Horowitz responded‚ “That’s the problem‚ they’re not‚” police blamed him. “They are peaceful until they feel like their space is being invaded‚ because they feel like this is their fight‚” the officer went on to say about the protesters on the public university’s campus. Horowitz says no action was taken against his attackers‚ even after he laid out what happened. “Even after I explained what happened‚ they didn’t go back out to grab these guys – knowing I have it on video because I told them I had‚ this was all filmed‚” Horowitz said. “They didn’t say‚ let’s look at the footage‚ and let’s go grab these guys. They were still out there.” Horowitz said their actions show that the protesters hate America just as much as they hate Israel. “If you did a Venn diagram of those who hate Israel‚ and those who hate America‚ they’d be concentric circles‚” Horowitz said. “It’s the administration‚ the professors … they’re feeding this garbage into the minds of these students. These students look up to these professors. It’s garbage in and garbage out.” The attack on Horowitz comes as several New York universities have been taken over by similar encampments. Columbia University gave anti-Israel protesters multiple deadlines to clear out before police would be authorized to remove their encampment‚ but backed down three different times before announcing yet another deadline‚ which the Columbia protesters disobeyed. Protesters at the university have now barricaded themselves in Columbia’s Hamilton Hall. #NOW Hamilton Hall is officially OCCUPIED after protesters and students STORM into Columbia University Building‚ breaking windows and barricading inside. Additional lawn has now also been occupied by &;quot;Gaza Solidarity Encampment&;quot; pic.twitter.com/vMJcAivl7S — Oliya Scootercaster 🛴 (@ScooterCasterNY) April 30‚ 2024 Protesters also occupied a building on the Fashion Institute of Technology campus and built an encampment on the New York University campus where over 150 people were arrested.

Barbra Streisand has been called out for asking actress Melissa McCarthy if she had joined the celebrity fad and was taking “Ozempic” to lose weight in a since-deleted Instagram post. McCarthy made a post on social media showing a cute picture of her in a mint green dress while walking with pal Adam Shankman on April 29. She captioned it‚ “Pastels only to honor the incredible [matthewbourne13] at the [ctgla] gala last night with this fella [adamshankman] &;#33;&;#33; Thiiiiis much closer to my dream of dancing on stage.” In the comments section‚ the 82-year-old actress/singer wrote‚ “Give [Shankman] my regards‚ did you take Ozempic&;#63;” The post has since been deleted‚ but screenshots of the comment are all over social media‚ with some people suggesting the “Funny Girl” star thought she was sending a direct message [DM] and didn’t realize her post was public. Omg…this comment from Barbra Streisand. Yes‚ it’s real‚ but she’s deleted it. pic.twitter.com/icINE1XqI4 — Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) April 30‚ 2024 “Bless her‚ she thought she was in the DMs‚” one TikToker wrote. Another person on X agreed‚ writing‚ “Omg somebody please teach Barbra Streisand how to send a DM.” Others suggested it was “rude” and “nasty‚” RadarOnline noted. “Wow really&;#33;” one Instagram user wrote. “What happened to not talking about Bodies&;#33; As a mother of a daughter that’s not ok‚ we as women need to not focus on appearance.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Another person responded‚ “I’m so totally taken aback that you could ask her that on Social Media for all to see&;#63; I love and adore you‚ truly‚ but that disappointed me.” While a third person wrote‚ “Did you actually just have the audacity to ask her that&;#63;&;#33; Especially right out here on social media&;#33;” Then there were those on social media who just cracked jokes about what Streisand did‚ Glamour magazine noted. “Barbra Streisand receives Tony Award for Best Special Theatrical Event for her groundbreaking‚ fearless work on Instagram‚” one person wrote sarcastically. Another person added‚ “Oh my God‚ Barbra‚ you can’t just ask people if they’re on Ozempic&;#33;” with a GIF from “Mean Girls.” And then there was the comment from someone defending Streisand‚ suggesting it was just something an “80-year-old New York woman” would say. “I really don’t think Barbra Streisand was trying to shade Melissa McCarthy‚” one person said. “I just think Barbra is a New York woman‚ they don’t beat around bushes.” Following reports of a backlash against the superstar‚ Streisand responded on X that‚ “OMG I went on Instagram to see the photos we’d posted of the beautiful flowers I’d received for my birthday.” “Below them was a photo of a friend Melissa McCarthy‚ who I sang with on my Encore album‚” she added. “She looked fantastic&;#33; I just wanted to pay her a compliment. I forgot the world is reading.”

The State Financial Officers Foundation announced on Tuesday a new effort‚ joined by Utah Treasurer Marlo Oaks (R)‚ to push back on the use of pension funds to back leftist political causes. The foundation launched the Public Fiduciary Network‚ chaired by Oaks‚ to raise awareness about the use of public pension funds to push politicized Environmental‚ Social‚ and Governance (ESG) initiatives. According to the group‚ there are about 5‚000 state and local pension funds across the United States that control trillions of dollars in assets. “Our goal is to provide education and resources for to them to understand the scope of the problem in the financial industry‚ the level of politicization of these funds‚ and to understand very clear ways that they can protect the fiduciary duty with respect to how they’re managing and overseeing these pension funds‚” Noah Wall‚ the executive director of the State Financial Officers Foundation‚ said at a press conference in Florida. Oaks‚ who will be the network’s national chair‚ said that teaching individuals on state and local pension boards about the efforts of some asset managers to back certain agendas was a “critical issue” because of the “politicization of our capital markets.” The Republican said that pension fund managers needed to go back to the traditional understanding of fiduciary responsibility where political agendas do not impact investment strategies. Earlier this month‚ a report from the American Accountability Foundation showed that Oklahoma public official retirement funds were being used to push decarbonization‚ racial audits‚ and pro-abortion policies. The report identified at least 216 ESG-tinged proposals that were backed using public retirement funds. When asked by The Daily Wire if there would be a specific area of geographic focus for the network‚ Wall said they hoped to recruit partners at every level across the country. “It’s a 50 state issue‚” he said. “We’ll be working on recruiting members on states from around the country. It’s not a red state or blue state problem. This is a national issue. We’re going be recruiting everyone down to the county commissioners that oversee local pension boards.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP State Financial Officer Foundation CEO Derek Kreifels said that raising awareness was especially needed because giant asset managers‚ like BlackRock‚ have stepped up their lobbying at the state and local level. Kreifels said BlackRock has sent mixed messages about its commitment to ESG investments‚ saying that its stance “depends on who’s in the room and who they’re talking to.” In recent years‚ states have stepped up efforts to block state funds from going through asset managers that have targeted the oil and gas industry.

Former President Donald Trump said Judge Juan Merchan is “rigging” the 2024 presidential election after the judge slapped Trump with a $9‚000 fine and threatened to jail him for social media posts that violated his gag order in the New York hush-money trial. Merchan wrote in an order on Tuesday that Trump had violated his gag order nine times‚ fining him $1‚000 for each offense. The former president is prohibited from commenting on potential witnesses‚ jurors‚ court staff‚ attorneys‚ and members of the judge’s family. Prosecutors urged Merchan to take action on Trump for violating the gag order‚ pointing to posts he made on his social media site Truth Social or his campaign website about Michael Cohen‚ Stormy Daniels‚ and the jury pool. “This Judge has taken away my Constitutional Right to FREE SPEECH‚” Trump wrote on Truth Social Tuesday afternoon. “I am the only Presidential Candidate in History to be GAGGED. This whole ‘Trial’ is RIGGED‚ and by taking away my FREEDOM OF SPEECH‚ THIS HIGHLY CONFLICTED JUDGE IS RIGGING THE PRESIDENTIAL OF 2024 ELECTION. ELECTION INTERFERENCE&;#33;&;#33;&;#33;” In his order‚ Merchan complained that he could not legally fine Trump more than $1‚000 for each violation‚ writing‚ “In some cases that might be a $2‚500 fine‚ in other cases it might be a fine of $150‚000.” “Because this Court is not cloaked with such discretion‚ it must therefore consider whether in some instances‚ jail may be a necessary punishment‚” the judge added. Merchan‚ who donated to Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential campaign against Trump‚ ordered the former president to delete the social media posts that violated the gag order by 2:15 p.m. ET‚ and Trump complied shortly before the deadline‚ The Hill reported. The presumptive Republican presidential nominee faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to cover up alleged hush-money payments to porn actress Stormy Daniels. Trump has been accused of paying Daniels over $130‚000 in 2016‚ but the former president has denied the allegations. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP The hush-money trial‚ brought by Manhattan Democratic District Attorney Alvin Bragg‚ is the first criminal trial against a former U.S. president. Trump has argued that he is being politically targeted during an election year as he also faces criminal trials in Georgia‚ Florida‚ and Washington‚ D.C. Tim Pearce contributed to this report.

On Monday‚ prosecutors in Arizona decided not to re-try George Alan Kelly after his prosecution resulted in a hung jury last week. Kelly‚ you may remember‚ is the Arizona rancher who was accused of shooting and killing a Mexican national named Gabriel Cuen-Buitimea‚ who was illegally trespassing on his property. Gabriel had previously been caught illegally in the United States several times before his death. He was most recently deported in 2016. As this trial got underway‚ I defended Kelly based on a pretty simple principle‚ which is that American citizens have a right to defend their property‚ their families‚ and themselves. That’s all we really needed to know about this case. Those men had no right to be on his property. And in this case they didn’t even have the right to be in the country‚ let alone his property. It is an egregious miscarriage of justice to prosecute a man for defending his property from illegal invaders — invaders who are illegal two times over.  But I have to admit that‚ until I looked more closely into the trial‚ I had no idea exactly how outrageous this prosecution was. I didn’t fully understand the extent of the depravity that motivated these prosecutors to ruin the life of a rancher in his 70s because he exercised his right of self-defense. However unjust you think this case is‚ it’s worse than that.  As I’ll explain in a moment‚ at trial‚ the prosecution couldn’t even prove that Kelly was responsible for killing Gabriel. In other words‚ it’s not just that the prosecution failed to disprove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt‚ which is their burden. The prosecution also failed to prove that Kelly had committed any form of homicide at all. Apparently‚ a single‚ lone juror is the only reason that George Alan Kelly wasn’t acquitted outright. And after you hear what happened in this case‚ the idea that even one juror would want to convict is truly unbelievable. Let’s begin with the prosecution’s opening statement. This is where the state had the opportunity to tease its star witness‚ a Honduran national named Daniel Ramirez. Supposedly‚ Ramirez — who was also illegally on Kelly’s property — witnessed Kelly murder Gabriel in cold blood. And Ramirez’s testimony‚ the prosecutors suggested‚ would be airtight. Watch: That’s the prosecution’s promise‚ and it sets the bar pretty high. Gabriel’s “companion” — not his criminal accomplice‚ but his companion‚ the prosecutor says — saw Gabriel get shot in the back because this maniac rancher was shooting wildly at them. “That is State v. George Alan Kelly in a nutshell‚” says the prosecutor. Well‚ that turned out to be true‚ although not in the way the prosecutor intended. Behold the testimony of star witness Daniel Ramirez: It’s painful to listen to. Yet‚ through the translator‚ we learn that Ramirez can’t remember much of anything — including what he said under oath‚ during the trial‚ right before the lunch break. This is the “companion” who was supposed to convince us that he remembers everything about the day that George Kelly murdered his buddy for no reason‚ out of the blue. We can’t cover all of the testimony because it’s long and excruciating to listen to. But suffice it to say‚ there were so many inconsistencies with what Ramirez said that he was worse than useless as a witness. For example‚ Ramirez said that he was with Gabriel just a few meters away from the house when the shooting happened‚ but the body was found more than 100 yards away from the house. Additionally‚ Ramirez said the shots went towards the house‚ which makes no sense. When he spoke to police‚ Ramirez first said that the shooting occurred west of Nogales‚ only to change his mind when he was told where the rancher actually lived. And on top of all that‚ Ramirez insisted that he saw his companion “fall backward‚” but the body was discovered face down. Oh‚ and Ramirez happens to be a drug smuggler (although he initially lied about that as well)‚ and he’s been caught trying to illegally enter this country between 8 and 10 times. WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show Now‚ if you want to give the prosecution the benefit of the doubt for some reason‚ you might discount all of this. You might say that this is one unreliable witness‚ and surely the rest of their case was solid. But actually‚ the fact that their star witness has the memory of a goldfish was just the beginning of the state’s problems. The larger issue was that‚ under the prosecution’s theory of the case‚ none of George Alan Kelly’s actions on the day of the shooting made any sense whatsoever. Here’s the timeline. In early January 2023‚ a Border Patrol agent and liaison‚ who frequently speaks to ranchers in the area‚ advised Kelly by text message several times that illegal aliens were traveling through the area in large groups: “Some may have had narcotics‚” the agent texted to Kelly. These kinds of texts continued throughout the month. Then on January 30th‚ several illegals were spotted by Border Patrol in the desert of Kino Springs‚ Arizona‚ and fled. At least two of them ended up on Kelly’s ranch — at which point‚ as he was making lunch‚ Kelly says he heard a gunshot. He calls the police‚ rushes outside‚ and fires several warning shots from his rifle. Kelly insists that the police come to his property. They conduct a full sweep — they’re mistakenly looking for an active shooter at this point — and don’t find anything. Then‚ hours later‚ Kelly finds the body and calls 911 voluntarily to report it. He doesn’t hide any shell casings. He doesn’t bury the body on his 170-acre property — as he could and would have if this was a murder. He immediately reports it. That’s not exactly consistent with the theory that Kelly is a murderer who just shot someone in cold blood. Normally‚ murderers don’t call the police and tell them to come search their remote property so that they can find a body. And then‚ if police miss the body‚ murderers don’t call the cops to inform them of that fact and invite them back onto their remote property. But that’s the prosecution’s theory here. The police came back to the ranch and decided very quickly that Kelly must have killed Gabriel — even though they couldn’t find the fatal bullet anywhere. This isn’t exactly solid logic‚ so instead of explaining it‚ the prosecution spent the rest of their opening statement lying about the 911 call about the body. Listen: Well‚ that sounds pretty bad. Supposedly‚ when Kelly was calling 911 to report that he had found a dead body‚ he called the man an “animal.” The implication‚ of course‚ is that he’s a bigoted MAGA Republican who thinks everyone from Mexico isn’t human. But the problem with this argument is that‚ even if Kelly had called Gabriel an “animal‚” it would be totally defensible based solely on his actions. This guy was a criminal‚ a repeat offender who continually and illegally trespassed into this country. It would be understandable if Kelly was angry and used unkind words to describe the dead intruder. And it wouldn’t prove that he was guilty of felony homicide.  But if you listen to the full 911 tape‚ you discover that actually‚ Kelly wasn’t calling this guy an animal because of his actions‚ or because of his nationality or ethnicity or anything like that. What happened is that Kelly very clearly didn’t want to provide any more statements to the police than he needed to. He had a vague idea — which would later be proven to be very correct — that the police would seek to use everything he said against him. So he didn’t want to be specific. He just wanted an officer to be dispatched to his property. This is a longer clip but it’s important to get the context to understand how deranged the prosecutor’s lies were. Listen: It’s a strange call‚ there’s no doubt about it. But it’s clear from that audio that Kelly is not making any kind of commentary on the person he just shot. He’s not saying illegals are animals or whatever. Nor is he trying to hide that there’s a dead human body on the property. Instead‚ he’s trying‚ albeit clumsily‚ to get police to his property while not admitting anything that‚ in his mind‚ might incriminate him. Of course‚ the prosecution (and the media) had to insinuate otherwise‚ because they know they don’t have an actual case. So‚ they decided that it’s best to just accuse this 70-something rancher of being a racist because of this phone call. There were other low points for the prosecution‚ like how they kept claiming that Gabriel was trying to live out the “American dream” — even though he showed up on Kelly’s property dressed in camouflage‚ wearing tactical boots‚ and equipped with an encrypted two-way radio. Somehow — despite that evidence — the police testified that they never considered the possibility that maybe he was a drug smuggler. It was farcical. But maybe the lowest point was prosecutors’ attempt to question Kelly’s wife‚ Wanda. It was important for prosecutors to try to discredit Wanda‚ because she testified that she saw the trespassers with firearms and camo backpacks. Watch: Here the prosecutors are trying to do to Wanda what the defense attorneys did to Ramirez. Except it doesn’t work. Ramirez can’t remember what he said before lunch‚ where the crime scene was‚ what direction the shots came from or what happened to his “companion” after he was hit. By contrast‚ Wanda couldn’t recall the precise number of gunshots that she heard during a moment of extreme stress. This is supposedly the prosecution’s “gotcha” moment.” The point was apparently to distract from the fact that the prosecution doesn’t actually have any evidence that Kelly even killed Gabriel. Because they never recovered a bullet‚ they couldn’t do any ballistics matching to determine whose gun fired the fatal shot. For all the authorities know‚ Gabriel could’ve been shot somewhere off-site and dragged to the ranch. Or he could have been shot on-site by someone else‚ and maybe that was the bullet that Kelly says he heard. The prosecution has no definitive answer to any of this. Their entire case hinges‚ instead‚ on an elderly couple not recalling the precise amount of warning shots that were fired. Now‚ have you heard any of these details&;#63; Probably not. I hadn’t heard many of these details either. The reason I decided to do a deeper dive into this case is that I saw a thread from the account “Rosie Memos” the other day on Twitter. She unearthed several incredible videos‚ including this footage of the Sheriff in Santa Cruz County falsely accusing Kelly of being an outsider and an “extremist” who wanted to “hunt me some Mexicans.” Watch: The sheriff is lying about the contents of Kelly’s book‚ for one thing. It’s not about “hunting” Mexicans. It’s about a rancher who fights drug cartels. And that’s not a crazy topic to write about when you’re constantly hearing from Border Patrol that drug cartels are running through your property. And of course Kelly isn’t an outsider. He lived on that property for more than a decade.  Right away‚ that gives you a sense of how completely one-sided this whole prosecution was. They decided to make an example of George Kelly and didn’t bother with building a real case. In fact the authorities didn’t do any real forensic work whatsoever. As I mentioned‚ they didn’t find the bullet. They also never found any gunshot residue and never tested the backpack that the trespassers were carrying for any gunshot residue. And‚ if you watch the trial and the various interviews‚ you’ll notice that the police decided very quickly that they were going to charge George Kelly. Their strategy was to interview Kelly and his wife multiple times‚ get them to say as much as possible‚ and then use any contradiction — however minor — as proof that Kelly is a murderer. If you needed yet more reason to never talk to the police unless it’s absolutely necessary‚ this is it. Even though Kelly is now free to go back to his life‚ the fact remains that the government tried to send this elderly man to prison for a “crime” that‚ even if he had committed‚ he would have been justified in doing so. And yet there is no direct evidence that he did commit it. There’s no way to explain why this prosecution occurred unless you understand that the state wants us to be helpless‚ demoralized and vulnerable. They are intentionally flooding our country with criminals and then punishing us if we do anything to protect ourselves from the wave of criminality they have invited into our lives and onto our properties. Now they’re going after just about anyone who has the audacity to take any steps to protect themselves. They want to terminate the right of self-defense‚ in addition to your property rights. It’s heinous. And somehow even more terrifying — judging by the fact that a juror somehow wanted to convict Kelly on these facts — is that more and more people seem to be fine with that.

Actress Lori Loughlin talked about overcoming “obstacles” in her first major interview since she served time behind bars for her part in the college admissions scheme in 2020. In the latest issue of First For Women magazine‚ the 59-year-old actress opened up about persevering after hard times four years after she pled guilty for her part in the Varsity Blues college admission scandal along with her husband Mossimo Giannulli. “Every day we’re met with different obstacles‚ but it’s all in how you approach things‚” Loughlin said. “For me‚ it’s just persevering and as an actress‚ I hear ‘no’ a lot‚ so I just have to be myself and persevere and try not to let in negativity.” “My advice is to just keep moving forward‚” she added. “Everyone has good times and bad times. That’s life. I think you just have to pick yourself up. Nobody said life was going to be a breeze. There’s beauty in life‚ but there’s also hardship in life.” Don’t miss this sneak peek of our exclusive cover interview with Lori Loughlin as she gets real about second chances‚ overcoming and self-confidence. https://t.co/UVOS3fISWq — FIRST for Women Magazine (@FIRSTmag) April 26‚ 2024 “Stuff happens to everyone. … I didn’t grow up in a household where if you made a mistake‚ you weren’t forgiven‚” Loughlin continued. “No one is perfect‚ we all make mistakes. So I was always told to let stuff go. And I think for your own health‚ you have to let things go because you can’t hang on to negativity. Life’s too short.” In May of 2020‚ Loughlin and Giannulli pled guilty to a variety of conspiracy charges after paying $500‚000 to get their two daughters‚ Isabella Rose and Olivia Jade‚ into the University of Southern California as phony rowing recruits. The “Every Christmas Has A Story” star served two months in prison‚ while her husband got five months behind bars. Loughlin was released in December 2020‚ but Giannulli remained behind bars. Giannulli was then released early on April 2‚ 2021‚ and served the remainder of his sentence at home. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP In January 2023‚ Loughlin appeared in her first TV movie role following prison time in the Great American Family’s (GAF) original film “Fall Into Winter.” Loughlin’s post-prison comeback became official after she appeared in another movie for the GAF Network called “A Christmas Blessing‚” which aired in November that year. “We’re thrilled to present stars Lori Loughlin‚ MrJamesTupper‚ and Jesse_Hutch in [AChristmasBlessing]‚ STARTING NOW‚ on [GreatAmericanFamily]&;#33; [WelcomeHome] [GreatAmericanChristmas] [GAfamilyTV]‚” President and CEO Bill Abbott of Great American Media wrote on X at the time.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) ripped left-wing funders this week who have donated to the groups behind the anti-Semitic protests on college campuses across the U.S. Cruz made the remarks on his “Verdict” podcast with co-host Ben Ferguson while discussing protests that have erupted at Columbia University‚ the University of Southern California‚ Yale University‚ New York University‚ and others. “The radical groups received at least $300‚000 from Soros’ Open Society Foundations since 2017 and it also took in $355‚000 from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund since 2019‚” Cruz said. “Let me stop and say something. The Rockefeller Brothers Fund‚ let me ask you‚ is there anybody around the Rockefeller Brothers Fund who’s not an anti-Semite&;#63; Who’s not a bigot&;#63; Who’s not an anti-American vicious Marxist&;#63; If there is‚ get them to stop it.” “There’s real money behind it‚” he continued. “And if you look at it‚ in many instances‚ so copycat tents had been seen at Harvard‚ at Yale‚ at Berkeley‚ at Ohio State‚ at Emory‚ and they’re organized by branches of the Students for Justice in Palestine‚ SJP‚ funded by George Soros.” Cruz then highlighted the worldview that many leftist professors have that they have taught their students. “The view of those Marxist academics is if you’re killing oppressors‚ that’s a good thing‚” Cruz said. “The other group are the so-called victims. And when it comes to the Middle East‚ the victims are the Palestinians‚ in the leftist view. And what Marxists advocate is the violent revolution of the victims against the oppressors. So‚ when the so-called victims are killing the oppressors‚ they’re cheering for the murderer‚ the Marxist is happy for the murder‚ they think it is a good thing.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP WATCH: