A.F. Branco and Joe Dan Gorman. We talk, yell, and laugh about current events that have inspired Tony’s cartoons, along with some videos and some bad jokes. Join us with your comments   DONATE to A.F. Branco Cartoons – Tips accepted and appreciated – $1.00 – $5.00 – $25.00 – $50.00 – it all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. Also Venmo @AFBranco – THANK YOU! A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions (art and politics) and translated them into cartoons that have been popular all over the country in various news outlets, including NewsMax, Fox News, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as Rep. Devin Nunes, Dinesh D’Souza, James Woods, Chris Salcedo, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, Rush Limbaugh, and President Trump.

Palaye Royale are set for a busy 2024, with a new record, and shows on both sides of the Atlantic. Watch the video for new single Showbiz

Nyrobi and Chaya’s long-awaited debut will come out in January via Earache Records



They brought bear spray, weapons and masks. The post Terror Supporters Came to LA’s Congregation Adas Torah for a Fight appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

The globalist who spent fourteen years ruining the Netherlands as Prime Minister is the secretary-general of NATO. He will be a good soldier for the World Economic Forum. Will WEF have outsized influence over NATO? He wasn’t always unpopular. However, he’s leaving the Dutch with a bitter taste after he did the WEF’s bidding and […] The post WEF Operative, Unpopular Dutch Prime Minister to Head NATO appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out a challenge brought by two Republican state officials and conservative social media users challenging the White House’s pressure campaigns on social media companies to remove what the Biden administration deems “misinformation.” In a 6-3 decision with Justice Amy Coney-Barrett writing the majority opinion, the court ruled that the plaintiffs did not have standing to bring the case, CNN reported. The high court did not rule on any of the First Amendment questions raised by the plaintiffs, which included the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana along with five conservative social media users. In her majority opinion, Barrett wrote, “To establish standing, the plaintiffs must demonstrate a substantial risk that, in the near future, they will suffer an injury that is traceable to a government defendant and redressable by the injunction they seek. Because no plaintiff has carried that burden, none has standing to seek a preliminary injunction.” Barrett acknowledged that there is evidence showing the White House “played a role” in moderating content on social media, but she argued that was not enough to justify an injunction. The plaintiffs cited Facebook restricting a Louisiana state representative’s posts about the COVID vaccine, arguing that the post was targeted because of the Biden administration’s pressure on the Big Tech company. Barrett, however, wrote in her opinion that there was “no evidence to support the states’ allegation.” Conservative Justice Samuel Alito penned the dissent, writing that the case was “one of the most important free speech cases to reach this Court in years.” Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch joined Alito’s dissent. Alito added that the Biden administration’s actions were “unconstitutional,” “coercive,” and “dangerous.” “It was blatantly unconstitutional, and the country may come to regret the Court’s failure to say so,” he wrote, adding, “For months, high-ranking Government officials placed unrelenting pressure on Facebook to suppress Americans’ free speech. Because the Court unjustifiably refuses to address this serious threat to the First Amendment, I respectfully dissent.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey reacted to the court’s decision, writing that the ruling “does not dispute” that “the deep state pressured and coerced social media companies to take down truthful speech simply because it was conservative.” “My rallying cry to disappointed Americans is this: Missouri is not done,” Bailey added. “We are going back to the district court to obtain more discovery in order to root out Joe Biden’s vast censorship enterprise once and for all.” The Daily Wire is suing the Biden administration in a separate social media censorship case, alleging that the U.S. State Department is engaging with and promoting censorship technology designed to bankrupt domestic media outlets with disfavored political opinions. Last month, a federal judge rejected the State Department’s attempt to get the censorship lawsuit dismissed. The Daily Wire is joined by The Federalist and the state of Texas as plaintiffs in the case.

This week, the Biden administration announced it opposes House Resolution 8774, the Department of Defense Appropriations Act which was passed by the GOP-led House, complaining it had “devastating consequences” for “access to reproductive healthcare … the health and safety of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex (LGBTQI+) Americans, endangered ‘marriage equality,’” and prevented the Biden administration from “promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion, which make the Nation’s military a more ready and lethal force.” “If the President were presented with H.R. 8774, he would veto it,” the Biden administration’s Office of Management and Budget declared. The White House criticized a Republican effort to cut $621 million for “DOD’s accounts identified as climate change-related.” The White House also said it “strongly opposes section 8122 of the bill, which would provide that USSOUTHCOM assume combatant command responsibility for activities related to Mexico.” OMB then explained that section 8122 would impede President Biden’s capacity “to organize military command and control through approval of a Unified Command Plan consistent with title 10, United States Code, section 161.” The White House opposed sections 8136, 8137, 8138, and 8139 of the bill, complaining, “These provisions would interfere with the President’s ability to determine the appropriate disposition of GTMO (Guantanamo Bay) detainees and to make important foreign policy and national security determinations regarding whether and under what circumstances to transfer detainees to the custody or effective control of foreign countries.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP The White House strongly opposed section 8167 of the bill, “which would prohibit the use of funds for the construction, maintenance, operation, or assembly of any pier or any structure built off the coast of Gaza.” The Gaza pier built by the Biden administration reportedly cost roughly $230 million; pro-Hamas terrorists launched a mortar attack on the pier in late April, U.S. officials said. “The Administration strongly opposes section 8153, as it contradicts Executive Order (EO) 14004, “Enabling All Qualified Americans to Serve Their Country in Uniform,” and EO 13988, “Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation,” which expands the discrimination protections previously offered solely on the basis of sex into the categories of gender identity and sexual orientation,” OMB stated. “The U.S. Military is the best fighting force in the world and it is one of the most diverse fighting forces in the world. Efforts to undermine DOD’s inclusion policies would undermine its efforts to foster a stronger and more resilient fighting force,” OMB claimed.