YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #virginia #freedom #police #humor #history #liberty #crime #animalbiology #thanksgiving #lawenforcement #pilgrims #happythanksgiving #rushlimbaugh #thanksgiving2025 #raccoon
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 y

Don’t know how to talk about consent with your kids? Here’s what a sex therapist has to say
Favicon 
www.optimistdaily.com

Don’t know how to talk about consent with your kids? Here’s what a sex therapist has to say

BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM Talking about consent with kids might be daunting, or at the very least, super awkward. But, it doesn’t have to be. The key is to start early and encourage regular communication about the topic. We know that when it comes to these kinds of topics, it’s much easier said than done. With this simple step-by-step guide for discussing consent, you’ll be given the tools to keep the consent conversation going with your children as they grow from toddlers to teenagers. The expert behind the guide Dr. Nan Wise is a registered sex therapist, relationship specialist, neuroscience researcher, and the author of Why Good Sex Matters: Understanding the Neuroscience of Pleasure for a Smarter, Happier, and More Purposeful Life. Dr. Wise’s research has received international attention for addressing gaps in the literature on the neurological basis of human sexuality. The basics: what is consent? According to Dr. Wise, consent is when a person “makes a conscious and unambiguous decision regarding what they are willing to participate in, whether it’s related to mutually agreed-upon sex or anything else having to do with their bodies.” She underlines that consent must be given voluntarily, without compulsion, and that consent may be rescinded at any time. “Consent can be withdrawn at any point, and the activity needs to stop immediately,” she asserts. Consent can be expressed vocally with a clear declaration or nonverbally with a head nod or thumbs up. However, Dr. Wise points out that “if the consent is communicated nonverbally, it’s important that both parties are clear on what’s being communicated, as people may read body language differently.” What does not count as consent? Dr. Wise identifies various instances that do not constitute consent. Obtaining approval for one type of activity does not constitute consent for all activities. Physical resistance without a verbal ‘no’ is not considered consent. Flirting or wearing exposing clothing doesn’t count as consent. Simply enjoying an activity does not constitute consent. Consent is revocable, which means that a person can change their mind even after an activity has begun. How to talk about consent with kids “The most important thing is that this conversation should happen numerous times as a child grows and develops and should be updated and expanded in age-appropriate ways,” explains Dr. Wise. This means that the conversation is not a one-and-done type of thing. For young children Begin by teaching young children about physical autonomy and the proper terminology for the parts of the body. Dr. Wise suggests teaching friends and family about respecting children’s limits. If someone attempts to violate children’s bodily autonomy, they should understand that it is not their fault and should report it to a trusted adult. These conversations should start early. “Begin by teaching the correct vocabulary for body parts and focusing on communicating the concepts of bodily autonomy and independence,” Dr. Wise says. For elementary and middle school students As your kids develop, continue the conversation with reminders about limits in a variety of scenarios. Dr. Wise proposed emphasizing that hugs between friends and family members are acceptable but not required, whereas embraces from strangers are unacceptable. She also suggests that rough-and-tumble play is OK if both people agree and enjoy it. For teenagers When children enter the teen years, the talk should become more in-depth. Dr. Wise emphasizes the significance of educating teenagers in a way that combats sexism and misogyny. “Stamp out harmful narratives, like that men should always want sex and will always push boundaries or that women are gatekeepers rather than equal sexual beings with their own wants and desires,” she says. This clarifies the consent process and encourages positive, respectful interactions. How should you ask for consent? Regardless of age, seeking consent should be simple and straightforward. Dr. Wise recommends statements like “Can I _____?” and “Do you want me to _____?” Listening closely to the response is critical. She recommends that teens learn to pay attention to their partner’s comfort level and check in on a frequent basis. “If someone says yes but doesn’t seem comfortable, check in again,” she advises. Why is it important to discuss consent? “Communicating about sex helps people have good boundaries and good connections,” explains Dr. Wise. Starting these conversations early allows children to feel comfortable discussing these concerns and make educated judgments about their boundaries. According to Dr. Wise, trouble discussing sex is a frequent issue, making it critical to normalize these conversations. “This ongoing communication connection with us as parents and eventually for them with their partners is the foundation of relational and sexual well-being.” Teaching children about consent is an ongoing process that changes as they mature. Starting early and discussing it will help your children learn and respect their own boundaries as well as those of others.The post Don’t know how to talk about consent with your kids? Here’s what a sex therapist has to say first appeared on The Optimist Daily: Making Solutions the News.
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 y

Innovative tracking technology strives to keep wild polar bears and humans apart 
Favicon 
www.optimistdaily.com

Innovative tracking technology strives to keep wild polar bears and humans apart 

BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM As summer ends in the Canadian Arctic, polar bears begin their trip inward, waiting for the ice to form. While tourists rush to see these gorgeous creatures, researchers are developing novel strategies to avoid hazardous confrontations between humans and bears. New tracking devices designed to attach to polar bear fur could revolutionize animal monitoring and ensure both species’ safety. Monitoring polar bears from afar With Arctic sea ice melting faster than ever before, polar bears are spending more time on land, prompting fears about more human-bear encounters. The tracking tags, which have been successfully tested on bears in the Canadian Arctic, are intended to “keep a remote eye” on their travels, potentially preventing unexpected confrontations.  Tyler Ross, a PhD candidate at York University in Toronto and the project’s chief researcher, emphasized the tags’ potential for minimizing human-bear interactions. “These tags are particularly promising for the prevention of human-bear interactions,” Ross said. Bears that approach too closely in southern Canadian Arctic towns often get relocated. The new tags could be attached to these bears to track their movements after release, providing conservationists with real-time data to intervene if bears approach human settlements again. Innovative tagging tech Traditional tracking measures, such as collars, are unsuccessful for male polar bears because their heads are smaller than their necks, allowing collars to slip off. Another option is to utilize ear tags, which entail recapturing the animal and can occasionally result in harm. The new fur tags, created by 3M in conjunction with Polar Bears International, provide a noninvasive option. Among the three tags tested, the SeaTrkr tag performed the best. Crimped into the bears’ fur, it remained attached for an average of 58 days and provided exact location data via an in-built GPS device. “It’s ideal to have something that falls off naturally and isn’t permanently attached to the bear,” Ross explained. “But anything that lasts in the order of a few months would be great for our research.” Filling gaps in the research The new tracking device could help us understand polar bear migrations better, especially as the Arctic climate warms. “There’s a dearth of information about male polar bear movements because they can’t be equipped with conventional tracking collars,” Ross explained. With sea ice melting quicker and the winter hunting season shorter, understanding how bears adapt is more important than ever. A 2022 US Geological Survey study employing satellite monitoring collars on nearly 400 polar bears in Alaska discovered that their time onshore had increased dramatically in recent decades. This shift emphasizes the importance of tracking their movements to avoid dangers. “Getting a better sense of polar bears’ movements is really crucial,” Ross commented. “Particularly given the state of their environment at this point.” Implications for conservation The findings, published in the journal Animal Biotelemetry, show that these novel tags have the potential to increase our understanding of polar bear behavior and help conservation efforts. As climate change brings bears and humans closer together, these tags could become an important tool for guaranteeing their protection. The capacity to track bears accurately and non-invasively opens up new options for conservation measures. Knowing where bears are likely to move allows wildlife officials to take preventive measures to keep them away from human populations, lowering the likelihood of conflict. As Ross and his team work to optimize these tags, their objective remains clear: to find long-term solutions to coexist with one of the Arctic’s most iconic inhabitants. Source study: Animal Biotelemetry—Telemetry without collars: performance of fur- and ear-mounted satellite tags for evaluating the movement and behaviour of polar bearsThe post Innovative tracking technology strives to keep wild polar bears and humans apart  first appeared on The Optimist Daily: Making Solutions the News.
Like
Comment
Share
Living In Faith
Living In Faith
1 y

3 Ways to Recognize When God Is Talking to You - The Crosswalk Devotional - July 23
Favicon 
www.christianity.com

3 Ways to Recognize When God Is Talking to You - The Crosswalk Devotional - July 23

Is there a Bible verse that keeps coming to mind? Are you unable to get it out of your head? Maybe God is putting it there for good reason. Pray and ask Him what He wants you to know.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
1 y

Miami Heat Win NBA Summer League Championship After 120–118 Victory Over Memphis Grizzlies
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Miami Heat Win NBA Summer League Championship After 120–118 Victory Over Memphis Grizzlies

The trophy is coming home to South Beach
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

The Great Immigration Experiment
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

The Great Immigration Experiment

Politics The Great Immigration Experiment The mass intake of foreigners has decisively failed. Can we decolonize America? Photo Credit: @NatConTalk Remarks delivered to NatCon 4 in Washington, DC. You are living in an experiment.  In March of this year, the foreign-born or immigrant population in the U.S.—both legal and illegal—hit record highs. 51.6 million people in the U.S. are foreign-born That is more than 15 percent of the population of this country—higher than at any time in our nation’s history. Many consider these immigrants to be “workers,” but more than half of the immigrants who arrived since 2022 are not employed. And of the approximately 2.5 million recent arrivals who are not employed only about 8 percent say they are actively looking for work.   Immigrants make up over a fifth of residents in California, New Jersey, New York, Texas, and Florida.  But less populous states are also seeing unprecedented immigration growth, with immigrant populations growing by 40 percent or more in Delaware, North and South Dakota, and West Virginia. An experiment is a test to discover if something works.  The numbers I’ve just described are a national experiment. And the American people are the guinea pigs. We know this is an experiment—a test, for which we don’t know the outcome—because this level of immigration is new and different in at least three ways.  First, the scale. The amount of immigration we are experiencing is unlike anything our country has experienced before. The U.S. is home to more international migrants than any other country in the world, and more than the next four countries on the list combined. And in fact, no country in modern history has experienced numbers like these. Second, the speed. Nine million aliens entered the country in all of the 1990s; now 10 million have entered during just the first three years of the Biden administration, with 58 percent of that increase coming as illegal immigration. This growth is far greater than even our government predictions would expect. The federal census data from 2020 predicted that the foreign-born population of the U.S. would not hit 15 percent until 2033. Yet it is 2024 and we have already surpassed that prediction. Third, this wave of immigration is unprecedented in its diversity. Previous waves of immigration tended to come from particular parts of the world, that made absorption easier. But now, immigrants come from every corner of the globe, speak every language and dialect, worship every kind of god, and reflect every culture that exists on the planet. And all of this matters because immigration can only be sustained when it can be assimilated. This is not a new idea—our Founders discussed and agreed on this point. As Jefferson put it: immigrants “should distribute themselves sparsely among the natives for quicker amalgamation.”  Consider the practical implications of immigration. Immigrants are more likely to be low-skilled compared to native-born Americans. According to one study, nearly a third of adult immigrants to the United States lack even a high school diploma. And about half of immigrants to the U.S. have limited—if any—English proficiency. So imagine a newly-arrived immigrant to this country, who is low-skilled, has fewer than 12 years of education, speaks little (if any) English, and generally knows little about American culture, government, our Constitution, or their legal rights.  Of course, that person can succeed here, and there are inspiring stories of those who have. But that person cannot succeed without a lot of help. Education, language remediation, instruction about citizenship and history, a supportive and high-trust community that is capable of conveying and reinforcing this information; plus job training; public assistance; housing assistance; healthcare assistance…the list goes on.  Now multiply that one person by tens of millions.  We do not have a system for providing the help that millions of immigrants need to succeed in this country. And of course, a government confused about basic biology and incapable of fulfilling basic functions, like holding free and fair elections, is not well-equipped to assimilate tens of millions of foreign nationals. This is different than previous generations. We are told that immigration is part of our country’s heritage, so we have to accept it—but during the height of the Progressive era in the United States, American businesses who imported immigrant labor also voluntarily promoted “Americanization.” Henry Ford created and compelled his immigrant employees to attend 8-month English language courses and other Americanization activities, believing that it was his responsibility to teach them—and this is a quote—“American ways, the English language, and the right way to live.” This was not unique among American corporations, and it spread to many prominent non-profits. Eventually, 30 states enacted legislative Americanization programs.  I don’t have to tell you that there are no widespread “Americanization” efforts trying to assimilate immigrants to this country today. In fact, in the name of diversity, equity, and inclusion, “Americanization” efforts are actively discouraged.  So today, our country is experimenting with the massive importation of immigrants to this country, a majority of them illegal. It is an experiment because it has never been done before, and no one can assure us that it can work or that it will work. Who is running this experiment—and why?   There are two groups running this experiment. First, the elites in this country—the ruling class—are the ones in the position to decide whether our border is open or closed, and to what degree. And elites benefit from open borders, so that is what they choose.  Elites can afford home help—from private tutors to gardeners—and other services, and those things are cheaper if there is a plentiful labor class of low-skilled workers.  That’s because low-skilled immigrant workers compete primarily with low-income native-born workers, who then suffer disproportionately from the effects of mass immigration. Low-income native-born workers suffer almost a 1 percent drop in income for every 1 percent increase in the immigrant composition of their industry.  And although mass immigration has cascading negative effects throughout the economy, the elite are largely blind to them. Unsurprisingly, housing more than 51 million immigrants causes pressures on the domestic housing supply. Home prices in this country have skyrocketed, making homes now unaffordable in 80 percent of the United States. And in more than half of the U.S., home prices are accelerating faster than wages.  Immigrants are straining healthcare availability throughout the country. One safety net hospital in Denver treated 20,000 illegal immigrants in 2023 alone, resulting in $10 million of uncompensated care provided. And immigrants are also straining schools. Again, in Denver public schools in a typical year enroll 500 illegal immigrant children, they have averaged 250 per week this year. Enormous, unplanned-for costs caused by this surge have required emergency appropriations, paying for remedial English language education and sourcing healthcare, food, and other services for immigrant minors. Immigration also stresses state and federal penal systems. According to the Department of Justice, one in five federal prisoners is an alien, and although many of them have committed immigration offenses, many more are incarcerated for other reasons. Forty-six percent of these aliens have committed drug-trafficking or other drug-related offenses and another 25 percent have committed a variety of other violent criminal offenses, like rape. I don’t need to remind you of the ever-increasing number of cases of young America women raped and murdered by illegal aliens in this country. And every crime committed by someone present illegally is a preventable crime. Illegal aliens impose enormous social welfare costs on the country, receiving between $84 and $94 billion more in government benefits and services than they pay in taxes.  All of these things disadvantage low- and middle-income Americans disproportionately.  And to add insult to injury, our current DEI regime ensures that a leg-up will be given to foreign-born candidates when they come into direct competition with native-born Americans, and most especially (though not exclusively) native-born whites. Elites, however, can weather these consequences by buying their way into private healthcare, private schools, and gated neighborhoods. So for elites, open borders are all upside, and that’s part of why we have them. The other group behind our mass immigration crisis are the multiculturalists, who supply the ideological underpinnings. Multiculturalism gained ascendancy in the 1990s and has only strengthened its grip since then.  Multiculturalism is an anti-Western ideology. It holds that America is composed of many distinct cultures; that the dominant Protestant Anglo culture has systemically subjugated these cultures; and that these cultures must be liberated.  Why? Because America should not have a single culture. Disunion is the express goal.  Multiculturalism has completely pervaded our educational system for decades and is adopted at the highest levels of the Democrat party and the U.S. administrative state – it is even unthinkingly espoused by some Republicans.  The result is that the U.S. uniquely among all nations encourages immigrants to hold on to their language, culture, and birth country identity. And ever-greater numbers of immigrants only makes this easier. With greater numbers, it is easier to replicate one’s home country on American soil and so avoid assimilation altogether. U.S. immigrants’ countries of origin want this effect, too, and deliberately cultivate it. Wealthy nations can advocate their strategic foreign policy interests through their wealth, power, and influence. But poor countries do so by exporting people.  The net effect of elite policy preferences combined with the pathology of multiculturalism is nothing short of the colonization of America.  If you doubt, look no further than the Minnesotan Representative Ilhan Omar’s now-famous rally in Minnesota just last month. She spoke Somali, to a crowd of Somali immigrants, and when the former prime minister of Somalia took the podium in support of Omar, he said her “interests aren’t those of Minnesota or the American people but those of Somalia.”  How will a future Trump administration decolonize America?  Let me be honest: I will be light on specifics here, and that’s intentional. This is a time for discretion. We’ve seen too many of our policy ideas be announced in advance, only to be reverse-engineered by blue state attorneys general and leftist interest groups into legal challenges.  But there are two basic things to be done:  If you encounter the federal government directly and you are present here illegally, you will be sent home. Period. No got-aways—not at the border, but also not in the interior of the country. No orders of removal that are not executed.  Many say that we should prioritize only the removal of criminal aliens—or violent criminal aliens—those who have raped or murdered American citizens. But such a policy essentially endorses indefinite lawlessness at our borders and makes explicit that anyone and everyone can come to the U.S. and remain in perpetuity, until they harm one of you.  No, removal is not reserved for violent criminals but is the consequence of having immigrated here illegally. And second, we will start making it a little “less good” for those present in this country illegally, by making things a little more fair for native-born Americans.  Right now, illegal immigrants in many American cities are receiving two years of free housing, free healthcare, food assistance, and other benefits—benefits that have never been extended to native-born Americans, including Americans who have fought and bled for this nation in foreign conflicts. And illegal aliens are also competing with Americans in so many other parts of life—banking, healthcare, housing. In all of these areas, every effort must be made to serve those who are lawfully present first, in fairness. To give you an example of what I mean: In July 2023, Florida required emergency rooms to ask patients their immigration status. And in the year that followed, Florida has experienced a 54 percent reduction in spending on emergency care through its federally-mandated Medicaid program for illegal aliens. In the words of one pro-immigration activist, Florida has experienced an “exodus of migrants.” We are not the only ones discussing how to undo mass immigration and its consequences. Many Western European states, long lauded by the left for their meek acceptance of mass immigration, are now attempting to rouse the energy and the will to confront millions of unassimilated and under-employed immigrant men. Austria, Denmark, Norway, even Spain and Sweden, are moving to restore some sense of balance to their immigrant flows and some modicum of safety to their streets. In many instances, however, these efforts are proving to be too little, too late.  I know what too late looks like, and that is why I am willing to say these hard truths. I grew up in a small-scale experiment of the kind now being attempted at the national level.  Stockton, California, the city of my birth, was the first city in the U.S. in which more than 50 percent of the city’s residents were minorities, a number that included native-born blacks and Hispanics who were already disproportionately confronted with the challenges of economic hardship, but who were now forced to compete with an enormous influx of low-skilled foreign-born migrants. There are those who will say that it is just coincidence that today Stockton is one of the most violent jurisdictions in modern America, with consistently one of the highest per-capita homicide rates; it’s just coincidence that the city is replete with long-forgotten diseases, like a 55 percent spike in tuberculosis just this year; it’s simply a coincidence that, despite its high crime-rate and persistent joblessness, Stockton has some of the most unaffordable housing in America. But it’s not a coincidence. Stockton is a precursor of a kind of community springing up all around our nation: a community where ordinary American citizens—black, white, brown—are made to feel unwelcome in their own neighborhoods, alienated from their own country. The immigrants who survive a place like Stockton are those who work hard, privilege education, speak English, and love this country. And while I appreciate the knowledge I gained about the architecture of Angkor Wat, the food of the Mayas, and the Zodiac tradition of Lunar New Year, my classmates and I would have been better served to learn the story of this nation’s founding, to be Americanized. The Stockton “experiment,” which has been an unmitigated disaster, proves why the only solution is to decolonize America. There is no sustainable way to absorb the immigration this country has experienced and remain a cohesive polity. Already, though, the corporate media are suggesting that the very thought of deporting anyone is racist and genocidal. But I’ve explained the experiment to you. And I think we are far enough along for the facts to give us a good idea of how it will come out. Pat Buchanan once asked whether in an age of mass immigration we can truly say we are still one nation and one unified people.  It is a question we should still be asking today. We cannot live solely on the memory of our republic.  Mass immigration, left unchecked and without consequence, will only continue. And it will remain incompatible with America as we once knew it and hope to know it again. It is profoundly unfair to millions of Americans in this country, who have been pushed aside for the arrival of millions of aliens, all in the service of elite policy preferences and the ideology of multiculturalism. It is time not just to end mass immigration, but to reverse it. To rediscover American culture, not multi-culture.  To decolonize and then re-Americanize this country.  The post The Great Immigration Experiment appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

GOP Scrambles to Face New Presidential Opponent
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

GOP Scrambles to Face New Presidential Opponent

Politics GOP Scrambles to Face New Presidential Opponent The Democrats aren’t the only ones caught flat-footed by Biden dropping from the race. President Joe Biden shocked the nation on Sunday when he announced in a letter posted on social media that he was ending his bid for a second term. It’s the end of the beginning for a chaotic summer that Democrats can ill afford heading into the general election cycle this November. Just over 100 days out from the presidential election on November 5, Democrats are scrambling to name a candidate, restructure their presidential campaign, and elect a presidential and vice presidential nominee. With so much uncertainty across the aisle, the right is also having to rethink and reposition its efforts to elect Trump and Republicans down ballot come November. Democrats across the media and political landscape started calling for the president to end his bid for the presidency after Biden’s disastrous debate performance against the former President Donald Trump three weeks ago. On Sunday, they got their wish. Though Biden has not been seen since dropping out of the race, Biden’s social media released a statement that read, “While it has been my intention to seek re-election, I believe it is in the best interest of my party and the country for me to stand down and to focus solely on fulfilling my duties as President for the remainder of my term.” The first question Republicans have, according to sources familiar with discussions on Capitol Hill, is Where is President Joe Biden? Biden, recently diagnosed with a case of Covid-19, was last seen getting off of Air Force One in Delaware four days before he withdrew from the race. While Biden has promised to address the nation with more details of his decision to not run for reelection in the coming days, the president’s schedule remains empty. Republicans are left speculating whether the president’s silence is because he is profoundly upset at his own party, which has been reported elsewhere, or his health is preventing him from doing so, which Vice President Kamala Harris denied in her first public appearance since Biden dropped out. Before Biden’s Sunday announcement, nearly 40 elected Democrats had called on Biden to step aside. Democratic power players, such as former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, orchestrated the pressure campaign to force Biden out of the race despite the wishes of Democratic primary voters. Despite Democrats finding themselves in uncharted territory just weeks before the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Biden and many of his detractors are coalescing behind Harris to be the Democrats’ nominee for president. Shortly after Biden’s social media accounts posted the letter, a subsequent post endorsed Harris.  “My very first decision as the party nominee in 2020 was to pick Kamala Harris as my Vice President,” the Biden post read. “And it’s been the best decision I’ve made. Today I want to offer my full support and endorsement for Kamala to be the nominee of our party this year. Democrats—it’s time to come together and beat Trump. Let’s do this.”  Pelosi and 200 other elected Democrats obliged and have endorsed Harris since Biden dropped out. Many of Harris’ would-be challengers for the nomination, such as Govs. Gavin Newsom (D-CA), Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI), and Josh Shapiro (D-PA), are among the Democrats to endorse her. If and how they angle for Harris’ running mate remains to be seen. Republicans are left wondering: If Biden is currently incapable of running for president, how can Biden perform his duties for the rest of his term? Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) has been repeatedly called for invoking the 25th Amendment against Biden for some time. Now, with Democrats apparently admitting that Biden cannot carry out his responsibilities as president, Republicans are looking into an effort to prematurely remove Biden from office.  “Democrats have been struggling with the box that they created for themselves by frankly keeping up the false pretense that the President of the United States was mentally cognizant enough to carry out the powers and duties of the office,” Roy said in a recent interview, which the Texas Congressman posted to X with the hashtag “25thAmendmentNow.” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) has also believed for some time that Biden should resign the presidency. Biden’s decision to drop out has only hardened the Speaker’s resolve. “If Joe Biden is not fit to run for President, he is not fit to serve as President. He must resign the office immediately. November 5 cannot arrive soon enough,” Johnson said in a statement. Roy and Johnson’s sentiments were echoed in the Senate. Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) told The American Conservative that “If Joe Biden can’t run for re-election, he is not capable of serving as president for the next six months and needs to resign today.” Removing Biden from office could be electorally risky, however, because it may give Harris some of the advantages of incumbency come November. Nevertheless, the questions that carry more profound electoral implications in whatever fact-finding effort into Biden’s decline that may follow is what did Harris, Biden staffers, and other powerful Democrats know about Biden’s declining faculties, when did they know it, and why did they not say anything before the first debate. “We know someone who can’t run for office is too diminished to serve in office. We need to know if Kamala Harris has been lying to the American people about Biden’s condition,” Riley Moore, the Republican Candidate for West Virginia’s Second Congressional district, told TAC. “What did she know and when did she know it? How long have she and her donor friends been planning to subvert the will of more than 14 million Americans?” “For four years, those closest to Joe Biden, including Kamala Harris, knew he was not fit to be president and lied to the American people in an effort to hold onto their power. It was painfully clear that Biden wasn’t competent for office going way back to 2021,” Scott told TAC. “Democrats laughed when I said Biden should be removed from office after his deadly Afghanistan withdrawal disaster. They’re not laughing now. Over those four years, we have seen immense damage done to our country. Our border is wide-open, inflation is crushing American families, and countless Americans have lost their lives at home and abroad due to the policy decisions of Joe Biden and his ‘border czar’ Kamala Harris.” Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) sent a statement to TAC marshaling the same fact pattern. “For three and a half years, the corrupt media and the deep state bureaucracy have lied to the American people. Today, President Biden finally admitted that President Trump was right all along: Joe Biden was never mentally fit to be President,” Tuberville wrote. “Democrats and the media knew Joe Biden had serious cognitive issues and they used him as their puppet for as long as they could. Now, they’re trying to gaslight Democrat voters into thinking they have a say when clearly the Democrat elites are running the show.” Until November, one of the GOP’s top priorities is to hold Biden, Harris, and Democrat power brokers to account: “Democrats and the complicit media must be held accountable for this massive cover-up. If Joe Biden is unfit to run again, he is unfit to hold the nuclear codes. I join my colleagues in demanding that President Biden resign immediately.” Despite upcoming GOP efforts to expose Biden’s decline, and who tried to cover it up, continued chaos in the Democratic Party reaffirms that a Republican victory in 2024 will take laying out a compelling vision of what four more years of a Trump presidency can accomplish. As Vivek Ramaswamy told TAC previously when Biden replacement theory was gaining steam: “We have to focus on what we stand for, and without that, I think we’re at risk of disappointment yet again.” And Republicans are already trying to turn Democratic messaging on Trump and the GOP being dangerous for democracy on its head.  “At this unprecedented juncture in American history, we must be clear about what just happened. The Democrat Party forced the Democrat nominee off the ballot, just over 100 days before the election,” Johnson’s abovementioned statement read. “Having invalidated the votes of more than 14 million Americans who selected Joe Biden to be the Democrat nominee for president, the self-proclaimed ‘party of democracy’ has proven exactly the opposite.” “Elite Democrats knew Joe Biden wasn’t fit for office. Now that the whole country knows, those same wealthy and well-connected Democrats have successfully overturned the results of primary elections in all fifty states,” Moore told TAC. “In America, your vote is supposed to matter.” “The Democrats’ hypocrisy knows no bounds. The same people who spent years saying President Trump and Republicans are a threat to democracy, just pushed out the sitting president from running for re-election because they don’t think he can win,” Scott claimed. “Let’s be clear—Washington’s Democrat elite went around the will of Democrat voters who picked Biden to be their nominee. They think they know better than the American people and will stop at nothing to hold on to power.” Even still, for Scott, this election will come down to the bread and butter issues. “While we welcome the news that one of America’s most destructive presidents will be denied a second term, it changes very little as to the stakes of this election. We cannot allow the American dream to be destroyed and replaced with California socialism. Come November, we will defeat the Democrats, elect Donald J. Trump, take back the Senate and the House, and save our country.” The post GOP Scrambles to Face New Presidential Opponent appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

Wanted: Secret Service Agents with Roofing Experience
Favicon 
conservativefiringline.com

Wanted: Secret Service Agents with Roofing Experience

The following article, Wanted: Secret Service Agents with Roofing Experience, was first published on Conservative Firing Line. Throughout suburban America each day teams of roofers are replacing old shingles with new on house roofs. Carrying tools and building materials, they move and work with sure footedness approaching that of mountain goats, and typically without the use of safety ropes to prevent falls. These workers came to mind when I read the excuse … Continue reading Wanted: Secret Service Agents with Roofing Experience ...
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

? BREAKING:- TRUMP ASSASSINATION - 11 shots fired from THREE distinct firearms
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

? BREAKING:- TRUMP ASSASSINATION - 11 shots fired from THREE distinct firearms

? BREAKING: Forensic analysis of the Trump assassination attempt reveals a chilling detail: 11 shots fired from THREE distinct firearms. The precise timing raises HUGE questions. Watch the video & see the breakdown
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

Kimberly Cheatle just refused to answer if Thomas Crooks was a lone gunman.
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

Kimberly Cheatle just refused to answer if Thomas Crooks was a lone gunman.

Kimberly Cheatle just refused to answer if Thomas Crooks was a lone gunman https://x.com/endwokeness/status/1815419468685647891?s=46
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y

What is a “semolina pilchard” in the Beatles song ‘I Am the Walrus’?
Favicon 
faroutmagazine.co.uk

What is a “semolina pilchard” in the Beatles song ‘I Am the Walrus’?

A bit fishy. The post What is a “semolina pilchard” in the Beatles song ‘I Am the Walrus’? first appeared on Far Out Magazine.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 66033 out of 101253
  • 66029
  • 66030
  • 66031
  • 66032
  • 66033
  • 66034
  • 66035
  • 66036
  • 66037
  • 66038
  • 66039
  • 66040
  • 66041
  • 66042
  • 66043
  • 66044
  • 66045
  • 66046
  • 66047
  • 66048
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund