It’s the best. READ MORE...

Darius Rucker is best known for his music, but he has another prominent job that we did not know about. Continue reading…

He's making a major move. Continue reading…

Home prices per square foot are almost 60 percent higher than they were five years ago, prior to the pandemic. Citing numbers from Realtor.com, Scotsman Guide, a publisher that caters to mortgage lenders, said that median list prices for home had grown 37.5 percent during the same time frame, but...

I keep telling you to watch what the Big Boys are doing… And “big girls” ok? Fine, let’s be all P.C. here. Watch what the Big Boys and Big Girls are doing….not what they tell you on CNBC. Because what they tell you on CNBC is often the exact opposite of what they are actually doing. And do you want to take a guess on who ends up being right? The Elites who are doing the exact opposite of what they just told you to do?  Or….you? I think you know. So I stopped playing that game a long time ago. I no longer listen to what they tell me on their CNBC and Fox Business and Bloomberg. Well, that’s not entirely accurate…. I listen and then I do the opposite! I also watch and study what they are actually doing behind the scenes. And do you want to know what that is? They’re stockpiling GOLD and SILVER just as fast as they can get their grubby little hands on it! Here’s the latest: The Central Bank of Turkey was the largest buyer of gold in April, increasing its official reserves by 8 tons. Turkey wants to become a member of BRICS. Russia welcomes Turkey’s reported desire to join BRICS. Connect the dots… pic.twitter.com/uo5GoSQyQK — Gold Telegraph (@GoldTelegraph_) June 4, 2024 But it’s not just Turkey… And this is not the first time I’ve told you about this. No, it’s almost every single Central Bank out there! Take a look at this: Central Banks On A Gold Buying Spree — What Do They Know That You Don’t? What do the Central Bankers know that you don’t? A lot. Oh, I don’t mean they’re any smarter than you, but what’s the best way to predict the future?  To plan it out and control it! And make no mistake, these are the shadowy people pulling the strings of world affairs behind the scenes….and they rarely lose. So I always say don’t listen to what they say (because they always “talk their book” and lie to your face) but watch what they do! And I think I know EXACTLY what they’re thinking…. In fact, I just published this story and I think this story now explains why the Central Bankers are all stockpiling and hoarding gold: BREAKING: The “BRICS” Just Doubled Overnight The beautiful thing is we live in a time where it’s hard to hide real data, especially when you have people like us researching it and posting it for all to see. And what is it that they’re doing? Simply put — they’re on a GOLD buying spree!  Yes indeed! It’s all been right there in front of us for everyone to see… BRICS expanding, new BRICS currency to be Gold-Backed or Priced in Gold? I could be wrong, but I’m thinking so. In other words:  GOT GOLD? Take a look at this: Central banks are on a $GOLD buying spree… This says a lot about fiat and debt pic.twitter.com/6kSxEMvCZv — FinFluential • Simplifying the Market (@FinFluentialx) December 6, 2023 42 tons in October alone, that is staggering! Central banks added a net 42 tonnes to global official gold reserves in October. Central banks continue to stockpile #gold. pic.twitter.com/BnlNtqATlG — Gold Telegraph (@GoldTelegraph_) December 5, 2023 For the second year in a row, these are the HIGHEST purchases by Central Banks since 2010: Central Banks are on pace to buy more than 1,000 tons of gold for the 2nd straight year and possibly reach the highest level purchased since 2010 pic.twitter.com/UXkLPx8DY8 — Barchart (@Barchart) December 7, 2023 Here’s more from Peter Schiff: Central banks gobbled up gold over the summer and the buying spree has continued into the fall. Globally, central banks added another net 42 tons of gold to their reserves in October. China continues to be the biggest gold purchaser. The People’s Bank of China added another 23 tons of gold to its hoard in October as it expanded its official reserves for the 12th straight month. Since the beginning of the year, the People’s Bank of China increased its reserves by 204 tons, and it has added 255 tons since it resumed official purchases in November 2022. As of the end of October, China officially held 2,215 tons of gold, making up 4% of its total reserves. Most people believe the Chinese hold even more gold than that off the books. There has always been speculation that China holds far more gold than it officially reveals. As Jim Rickards pointed out on Mises Daily back in 2015, many people speculate that China keeps several thousand tons of gold “off the books” in a separate entity called the State Administration for Foreign Exchange (SAFE). Last year, there were large unreported increases in central bank gold holdings.  Central banks that often fail to report purchases include China and Russia. Many analysts believe China is the mystery buyer stockpiling gold to minimize exposure to the dollar. The Central Bank of Turkey also made another big gold buy in October, expanding its holdings by 19 tons. Even with big purchases over the last several months, Turkey is still a net seller on the year. The Turkish central bank sold 160 tons of gold last spring but returned to buying in the third quarter. According to the World Gold Council, the big gold sale earlier this year was a specific response to local market dynamics and didn’t likely reflect a change in the Turkish central bank’s long-term gold strategy. It sold gold into the local market to satisfy demand after the government imposed import quotas in an attempt to improve its current account balance. The country is running a significant trade deficit. Although the Turkish government reinstated gold import quotas in early August, so far we haven’t seen a repeat of sales into the local market to meet elevated demand. The National Bank of Poland also continued its recent gold-buying spree, expanding its reserves by another 6 tons. Its gold holdings have now risen by over 100 tons this year. In 2021, Bank of Poland President Adam Glapiński announced a plan to expand the country’s gold reserves by 100 tons. Now that it’s reached that gold, Glapiński indicated it will continue to add gold to its holdings. This makes Poland a more credible country, we have a better standing in all ratings, we are a very serious partner and we will continue to buy gold. The dream is to reach 20 percent.” When he announced the plan to expand its gold reserves, Glapiński said holding gold was a matter of financial security and stability. Gold will retain its value even when someone cuts off the power to the global financial system, destroying traditional assets based on electronic accounting records. Of course, we do not assume that this will happen. But as the saying goes – forewarned is always insured. And the central bank is required to be prepared for even the most unfavorable circumstances. That is why we see a special place for gold in our foreign exchange management process.” Other significant gold buyers in October included: India — 3 tons The Czech Republic — 2 tons The Kyrgyz Republic — 1 ton Qatar — 1 ton So….what can YOU do about it? I’ve been telling you for a while now, and perhaps this is the “sign” you need to finally take action! First, you need to watch what the big boys are doing and understand it’s smart to ride their coattails. I think we accomplished that above. Second, here’s my preferred solution for owning gold. Why preferred? A couple reasons…. I’m not a CPA or tax advisor or even an investment advisor of any kind, but the folks I’m about to tell you about are experts at this. They’re patriots… They’ll give you personalized, one-on-one attention by phone…. And they’ll show you how you can do this with NO MONEY OUT OF POCKET — all in a retirement account and usually tax free! How’s that for a win-win-win? So what can you do? THIS!  Here’s Why Central Banks Are Buying All the Gold They Can — And What YOU Can Do! For the last two years, central banks across the globe have been buying up as much gold (and often silver) as they can acquire without raising alarm bells. Now, we see why. The recent bank runs and ongoing collapse of the U.S. banking system was anticipated by the “elites” and the central bankers who run things behind the scenes. They saw it coming and knew the best way to protect their assets was through physical precious metals. If you’ve been waiting for me to bring you a solution about what YOU can do to protect yourself and you’re family, I’m happy to introduce you to something I absolutely love! Precious metals. I just talked about precious metals this week with Bo Polny and now I’m bringing you a solution that you can utilize right away if you’re so inclined… A faith-driven, conservative precious metals company is currently helping Americans tap into the rising precious metals market through self-directed IRAs backed by physical precious metals. And while this service is not unique to Genesis, their adherence to Biblical stewardship of money makes them singularly qualified to receive a sponsored recommendation from this site. Unlike most companies offering similar services, Genesis deals only with physical precious metals. They do not offer “virtual” or “paper” gold or silver. With Genesis and their depositories, customers can see and touch the precious metals that back their retirement accounts. When it comes time to take distributions, Genesis customers can cash in some or all of their precious metals or have them delivered to their door. Central bankers aren’t slowing down. In fact, nations like China and even U.S. states like Tennessee are quickly but quietly buying up gold to back their own treasuries. When the writing on the wall is this clear, it’s understandable why these governments are moving quickly to get ahead of any potential economic catastrophes in store. Working with Genesis is the best way our readers can explore the physical precious metals market through self-directed IRAs. It benefits us as well when our readers work with this America-First company. Visit genesiswlt.com or call 866-292-0443 today. Don’t wait too long, we might have more bank failures right around the corner. You know what has NEVER “failed”? Gold.  Precious metals.  Indestructible. There’s a reason they call it “God’s money”. Watch this for more: Or….I guess you could buy Gold at Costco? If you can find any? Oh, and you’ll pay a huge markup and you’ll be limited to two bars. A “Gold Rush” Hits Costco With Demand For Gold Bars – Here’s One Way To Own Gold if Your Money Is In a Retirement Account The demand for physical precious metals has been rising since before the pandemic.  Central banks have been buying ton after ton for two years. Even some U.S. states — like Tennessee — are filling their coffers with physical precious metals. Now, Costco is offering gold bars to their members — and some observers are saying there is a “gold rush” on Costco’s gold: Mike Cernovich reported: “People buying them but bars sold out fast. One disappointed customer had paid but the membership pick-up said it was out.” Others had no idea Costco sold gold: Buying gold at Costco is great for those who have extra cash on hand — but what about those of us with money tied up in retirement accounts? Can we rollover or transfer retirement accounts into physical precious metals and keep it tax-deferred? Genesis Gold Group says “Yes!” Genesis Gold Group specializes in self-directed IRAs backed by gold and silver. As a Christian company, they believe this is an appropriate form of financial stewardship that puts Americans’ money on the fiscal high ground. This isn’t “paper” or “virtual” gold or silver; Genesis Gold Group customers can physically see their precious metals at their convenience. And when it comes time to take a disbursement, they can convert to cash or have their precious metals shipped directly to their homes. Click here to reach out today through genesiswlt.com. Genesis Gold Group was given 5 stars by reviewers on the Better Business Bureau website. Here is what some of them say: “Genesis Gold Group has been very helpful to me as a first time customer. They were very patient with me and answered every question I had. The process of moving my funds from my former account to Genesis Gold Group was straightforward and easy. I highly recommend their services.” — Brian B. “Recently, I had two experiences with Genesis Gold Group and both were very easy transactions. My agent was very knowledgeable and informative about the products that I was interested in. I suggest that for anyone looking to move their retirement into tangible materials, Genesis Gold Group is the company to choose.” — Joyce R. “Genesis Gold Group is a wonderful company to do business with. The staff are knowledgeable, courteous, and patient. They know I’ve had many questions before, during, and even after opening my Self-Directed IRA and everyone has been very kind and open. Start your Gold IRA with Genesis Gold Group without reservation!” — Gerald C. To work with Genesis Gold Group to own precious metals via your retirement accounts, click here to reach out today. Oh, and did you know SUPERMAN loves them too? Yup! Here is what conservative star Dean Cain (Superman) says about working with Genesis Gold Group: When Genesis Gold Group was first built, co-founder Jonathan Rose knew two things were necessary in order to thrive in the extremely competitive precious metals industry. First, he knew they wouldn’t repeat the same deceptive marketing tactics “Big Gold” companies use to entice customers. Second, he knew they needed spiritual guidance if they were going to succeed in reaching Americans who want their life’s savings protected from the tumultuous markets. “If we are going to live up to our namesake, we have to be truly driven by Biblical principles… not only as individuals but as a company,” Rose said. Millions of Americans have grown increasingly concerned about the trajectory of our nation. It made sense for Genesis Gold Group to launch by combining over 50-years of experience in gold and silver with proper guidance from faith leaders. This is why Director of Philanthropy David Holland, was one of the first people they hired. “As a minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, I firmly believe good stewardship of a believer’s resources is important and a foundation for a close walk with Him,” Holland said. “It is not difficult to see, based on the lack of biblical values in both our government and financial system, that we are swiftly heading into unstable times.” The challenges aren’t just coming from the economy or government. The precious metals industry itself is rife with “Big Gold” companies who are willing to use sketchy marketing tactics and over-the-top sales pressure to get Americans into overpriced products. Self-directed IRAs backed by physical precious metals are becoming more popular for mature Americans who are concerned about inflation, unsustainable debt, the ongoing banking crisis, and “woke” ESG funds filling their retirement portfolios. Click here to reach out to Genesis Gold Group today. The challenge, as Rose noted, is that the vast majority of self-directed IRA products being pushed by “Big Gold” are not built with the customers’ best interests in mind. “The process appears to be the same from one gold company to another but there’s a huge gap between how secular gold companies do business versus how we do it,” Rose said. “We guide our clients to back their retirement accounts with metals that are priced right and have the greatest opportunity for growth. Most gold companies look only at their own margins when filling their customers’ depositories.” ==>Click here to contact Genesis Gold Group today and receive a free Definitive Gold Guide and learn more about protecting your life’s savings from the various threats we’re facing today. (Note: Thank you for supporting American businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and working with them through the links in this article which benefit WLTReport. We appreciate your support and the opportunity to tell you about Genesis Gold!  The information provided by WLTReport or any related communications is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice. We do not provide personalized investment, financial, or legal advice.) 

Although the most notable example resulted in the collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge, there have been a number of suspicious incidents involving out-of-control container ships either hitting or narrowly missing bridges across the United States in recent months. The latest example occurred in South Carolina and led to a temporary closure and evacuation on a nearby bridge. According to The Hill: An investigation is underway after a large container ship lost the ability to control its engines in Charleston Harbor, prompting a temporary closure of the Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge. U.S. Coast Guard Sector Command Center in Charleston, South Carolina, received a report from the harbor’s pilot dispatch around 12:17 p.m. of an out-of-control vessel in the Cooper River. Deputy Commander Randy Preston said the vessel was identified as the MSC Michigan 7, a 997-foot, 74,000-ton container ship outbound from the North Charleston container terminal headed to Savannah, Georgia. “The pilot on board indicated the vessel lost ability to control the engines and they were stuck nearly full-ahead with the vessel making between 14 to 17 knots,” said Preston. Throttles were near-full forward and could not be moved out of that position. Coast Guard boats and other agency partner assets were alerted and cleared vessel traffic from the ship channel. Charleston and Mount Pleasant police departments closed the Ravenel Bridge and began evacuating pedestrians before the ship passed underneath. The Baltimore incident and similar events in the subsequent months have sparked an array of theories that have spread far and wide on social media: Baltimore, Maryland SITREP: The Francis Scott Key Bridge was Struck by a Cargo Ship, Collapsing the Bridge • My opinion is This was a potential cyber attack. Notice the ship lights go off before steering into the column • Sonar indicates that several vehicles are in the… pic.twitter.com/mII8BG5Xed — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) March 26, 2024 I bet you did NOT hear about this… A container ship owned by a French shipping company, APL QINGDAO lost control in New York City Harbor on Friday near the Verrazano-Narrows bridge, after LOSING POWER temporarily. Wait a second… Didn’t the Dali container ship that hit the… pic.twitter.com/kIyzLRFJT9 — The Patriot Voice (@TPV_John) April 7, 2024 Looks deliberate to me. A cyber-attack is probable. WW3 has already started.. https://t.co/wLTGjT6ErN — Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) March 26, 2024 Welcome to the world of cyber terrorism. Acc to intel sources: The Baltimore bridge collapse was a 9/11 style attack but they won’t admit it and we cannot see it because it was a CYBER ATTACK. All the SCADA systems that run our critical infrastructure like sewage, electric… — Lara Logan (@laralogan) March 26, 2024 Although the South Carolina bridge did not sustain a direct impact from the ship, experts say it would not have met the same fate as the Francis Scott Key Bridge even if it had. As Sky News reported: The incident on 26 March destroyed the bridge and killed six construction workers. Engineers said the Ravenel Bridge was designed differently and could withstand a similar blow. The cable-stayed structure, which opened in 2005, stands 186ft (57m) above the Cooper River. Its towers are 575ft (175m) above the water, and engineers claim it is designed to withstand wind gusts of up to 300mph (483kph) – stronger than any hurricane in recorded history. Here’s some local coverage of the near miss: RELATED REPORT: ANOTHER ‘Accident’: Barge Collides With Texas Bridge, Resulting In Collapse As crews continue sifting through the wreckage of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, several other bridges have been hit by container ships in a series of incidents that has sparked speculation that U.S. infrastructure could be under attack. The latest incident occurred in Galveston, Texas, as reported by Fox News: A large barge crashed into the Pelican Island Bridge in Texas on Wednesday, causing a section of the bridge, including railroad tracks, to smash down onto the barge, Fox 7 Austin reports. Officials say there were no reports of injuries in the collision that occurred around 10 a.m. However, Galveston County Judge Mark Henry says two crew members did go overboard but were recovered from the water, Fox 7 Austin reports. Henry says the collision caused oil to spill from the barge, which has a capacity of 30,000 gallons, although it is unclear how much of it went into the water. Pelican Island is located north of Galveston and is connected to the city by the bridge. Officials say the bridge has been shut down to traffic in both directions. News of the latest incident quickly spread via social media: JUST IN: Barge hits Pelican Island Bridge in Galveston, Texas, causing railway to collapse pic.twitter.com/iaJI7cao7O — BNO News (@BNONews) May 15, 2024 A large barge just struck the bridge to and from Pelican Island in Galveston, Texas. Will Pete Buttigieg blame the bridge and say it’s racist? Was DEI at play here?pic.twitter.com/T7XwPYoxK3 — Paul A. Szypula (@Bubblebathgirl) May 15, 2024 BREAKING: A barge has crashed into a bridge over Pelican Island Causeway in Galveston, Texas. Reports of chemicals or another liquid substance leaking into water. What is going on?!pic.twitter.com/qP2gXf3hqT — Steve (@SteveLovesAmmo) May 15, 2024 Another bridge “incident” A barge has hit the bridge to/from Pelican Island in Galveston, Texas.pic.twitter.com/fOJDFuHP9I — eve (@eveforamerica) May 15, 2024 Here we go yet again. In Galveston, Texas, a good sized barge has ran right into the Pelican Island Causeway bridge. As you can see below, some sort of chemical or oil has spilled into the water around the barge. Is this by coincidence ? I think not. pic.twitter.com/kMRwScybmC — Silent Silas (@RagingKuJo1222) May 15, 2024 In the aftermath of the Baltimore incident, a number of prominent figures began floating theories that the collision was part of an organized attack on the homeland. One of the most notable examples was investigative journalist Lara Logan. Multiple intel sources: Baltimore bridge collapse was an “absolutely brilliant strategic attack” on US critical infrastructure – most likely cyber – & our intel agencies know it. In information warfare terms, they just divided the US along the Mason Dixon line exactly like the… — Lara Logan (@laralogan) March 26, 2024 As TheBlaze reported last month: After talking to many people, including some who “had worked in Baltimore for 30 years,” some who “worked in maritime attacks,” and others who “are still on active duty in the intelligence community,” Lara came away with a narrative about the bridge collapse that didn’t at all match the official statement given by authorities. “One person in particular knew instantly that from the very first moment that he saw that ship, it wasn’t inside the channel, which is where it has to be when it’s on course,” she explains. Further, “Multiple intelligence professionals” told Lara that they “knew the moment they saw it” that the collision “was a technique … because [they] carry out this technique on foreign battlefields.” Here’s a full clip of her comments:

You know, when I set out to start this website nearly 10 years ago, I envisioned covering national and world events. The glamour…. The prestige… The honor and dignity! Never in my wildest dreams did I think I’d have to cover the (alleged) President of the United States and ANALyze whether or not he just did another poopsie doopsie in his pants. And yet here we are. And yes, it’s an actual news story — not something I am just making up. Here’s what people are saying (and then keep reading for what I’ve found about this): What the hell is going on here?? Did Biden just sht himself on stage?!pic.twitter.com/COp13luzSn — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) June 6, 2024 After that incident, many pointed out Biden was swiftly “whisked away”, leaving French President Macron to greet the Veterans by himself: HE POOPED HOLY SHIT https://t.co/VC8fKojdq3 — Tim Pool (@Timcast) June 6, 2024 The aftermath confirms it, had to be quickly removed while Macron stays and greets war heroes, Biden just popped his pants on stage pic.twitter.com/54SvTvkdr7 — Booker9e (@booker9e) June 6, 2024 My favorites are the ones who say they immediately recognized this “move” because it’s the exact same stance their toddler takes when dropping a huge load in their pants: President Biden just pooped himself. This is the exact same motion my toddler makes Too bad it was onstage at the D-Day Ceremony in Normandy pic.twitter.com/1TD8OtduIk — AJAC (@AJA_Cortes) June 6, 2024 Anyone with young children knows exactly what just happened…. Joe Biden just made a Stinky in his pants.https://t.co/TlfsNt6rlm pic.twitter.com/jdFunQ5VOI — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) June 6, 2024 It’s definitely not the first time we’ve seen Joe Biden do this “move”…. Remember when he stopped mid-walk and “assumed the position” and once again I was left here writing a story to analyze whether or not our (alleged) sitting President just dumped in his pants? Watch this: It appears that Joe Biden has pooped in his pants on camera pic.twitter.com/ZboewPhmBo — UBERSOY (@UBERSOY1) May 6, 2024 So….did he really do it? Did he just poop his pants on stage with Macron? Well, the short answer is I don’t know for sure.  I wasn’t there, I (fortunately) didn’t get the chance to smell it.  So I don’t know. And I’m not in the business of giving Joe Biden the benefit of the doubt because he has never once demonstrated he deserves it, but….we’re also in the business of fair and honest reporting. So credit to Fletch17 for this one…watch below and you will see the video everyone keeps sharing is cut off early and the full version shows Biden may not have been “assuming the position of the Toddler dump” but rather just sitting down too early — equally embarrassing — but watch this: Real full video, all the other ones were cut offHe was just sitting too early Completely unprofessional And Jill told him to wait…….. pic.twitter.com/jczrh41jSa — Fletch17 (@17ThankQ) June 6, 2024 Still, it doesn’t change the truth that he was also whisked away early and did not stay to greet the Veterans, leaving Macron to do it alone. So what really happened? I don’t know for sure, you will have to make up your own mind. At the very least, he violated protocol and sat down too early, either because he’s old and senile, old and tired, old and confused, or old and pooped his pants.  Or some combination of all of the above. Then we know he was whisked away prematurely, and we don’t know why. So there you go! We also know this…. This is (sadly) far from the first time I’ve had to write about Joe Biden pooping his pants or screaming out “My Butt’s Been Wiped!”. Remember this? Did We Finally Just Find Out Why Joe Biden Shouted “My Butt’s Been Wiped”? And this? Did Biden Poop His Pants At The Vatican? Absolutely despicable. RELATED REPORT: Joe Biden Now Using a "Team of Walkers" Joe Biden has a new strategy to try and hide his failing health. A team of walkers! Like a bunch of blockers forming a wedge for the Running Back in Football, Biden now has his own team of "Walkers" designed to flank the media from noticing his failing health and awkward gait. Take a look: Joe Biden now requires ‘walkers’ to escort him around, according to Axios. This isn’t a surprise given his failing mental and physical health. Here’s Biden before and after he had a walker. This juxtaposition really illustrates how his gate is way off.pic.twitter.com/DAlDBXKyge — Paul A. Szypula (@Bubblebathgirl) April 26, 2024 More here: Can't Make It Up: The President of the United States has been assigned “walkers.” You heard that right. The man that has access to nuke codes now requires aides to escort him across a lawn. These handlers now walk between Biden and the pool cameras, "to draw less attention to… pic.twitter.com/RO81Dvufb6 — Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) April 26, 2024 Why does he look so weird when he walks? Like he's got a corncob stuck up his anus or a huge dump in his pants! Come on now, we've all been there.... Not the first one but the second one. We've all had that horrible moment when we trusted a fart more than we should have and we end up with some liquid in our drawers. Do not tell me it's never happened to you.... And when it does happen, how do you walk? EXACTLY like this: Joe Biden ‘uses team of walkers to hide shuffling gait’ to Marine One President travels surrounded by aides to reduce concerns about his age ahead of election pic.twitter.com/YtHHvvhxow — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) April 26, 2024 The Telegraph had more on the new development: Joe Biden is using a team of “walkers” around him to disguise his shuffling gait from photographers, it has been claimed. The US president, 81, has begun walking across the White House lawn surrounded by a group of aides when boarding Marine One, his helicopter. Traditionally, presidents approach the helicopter alone to give photographers a clearer shot but Mr Biden’s team became concerned that footage of him walking alone emphasised his shuffling gait and could worsen concerns about his age, Axios reported. They said that walking slowly across the grass alone made Mr Biden look older. The team has reportedly tasked a team of advisers also travelling with Mr Biden to walk alongside him for the Marine One shot, obscuring Mr Biden’s legs. They include Bruce Reed and Annie Tomasini, his deputy chiefs of staff, and Mike Donilon, his close adviser. Mr Biden himself has told aides he would prefer a “less formal” walking style in photographs, after his doctor revealed he had “spinal arthritis” and “mild sensory peripheral neuropathy of the feet” that made his gait stiffer. The new strategy began earlier this month and Mr Biden has been seen walking with advisers nine in 10 times since April 16. It comes after Mr Biden’s team suggested he wear “maximum stability” shoes to stop him from falling over. Yeah, I would have to say the new strategy is NOT working as we can still (unfortunately) see him. I think you all need to run a tighter formation. But not shocking that these incompetent asshats can't even manage to get this correct. RELATED: Biden Panicked That Trump Will Invoke The Insurrection Act" -- Here's What That Actually Means We've heard a lot about "Insurrection" over the last 3 years... Way more than I ever care to hear for the rest of my life. A made up and fake "scandal" designed to divert your attention from the truth. Basically, this meme: But while we've heard copious amounts of talk about "acts of insurrection" we haven't heard much about the "Insurrection Act". Two very different things. I'm going to explain the "Insurrection Act" to you in just a moment, but first let me show you this very angry, panicked video from a recent Biden speech. If you ask me, they know what's coming and they are terrified: Biden says that “Trump plans to invoke the Insurrection Act which will allow him to deploy US military forces on the streets of America.” This panic-ridden speech is absolutely hilarious. It’s so cartoonish that they are either scared to death of what’s to come or they are… pic.twitter.com/0JrxtkjIo7 — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) January 5, 2024 Biden says that “Trump plans to invoke the Insurrection Act which will allow him to deploy US military forces on the streets of America.” This panic-ridden speech is absolutely hilarious. It’s so cartoonish that they are either scared to death of what’s to come or they are purposely sabotaging themselves. Cartoonish is absolutely right. Just look at how his face contorts with anger and evil, that's some wild stuff! But back to the topic at hand, why is Joe Biden so panicked about President Trump using the Insurrection Act? Let me explain.... Trump May Deploy "Ironic" 1795 Law To Clean Up America Occam's Razor says that the simplest answer is usually correct. Elon Musk often jokes that the most "ironic" outcome is usually the most likely to occur. And he might just be right on this one. What is the one word the Crooked Media and Crooked Congress has tried to sink President Trump with since January 2021? "Insurrection" In that context, people afraid that President Trump will win again (big league) in 2024, have tried to use the "Insurrection Clause" of the 14th Amendment to bar him from the ballot: Prohibition Against Holding Office: Section 3 of the 14th Amendment states that no person shall hold any office, civil or military, under the United States or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. Of course we know that's completely bogus, but did you know there is actually a different law on the books from 1795 called The Insurrection Act? Totally different thing, and the irony above all ironies is that President Trump may deploy it on Day 1 of his Presidency to clean up America: The Insurrection Act of 1795 is a United States federal law that empowers the President to deploy U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops within the United States in specific circumstances, such as to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, and rebellion. The key aspects of this act include: Authorization for Use: The Act allows the President to use the armed forces to address an insurrection in any state which requests it, or in situations where it's necessary to enforce federal law. Conditions for Deployment: Before deploying troops, the President must first issue a proclamation ordering the insurgents to disperse within a limited time. If the situation does not resolve after this proclamation, the President can then use military force. Historical Context: Enacted in 1795, the law was a response to the Whiskey Rebellion, a 1794 uprising against federal tax collections in western Pennsylvania. Subsequent Amendments: The Act has been amended several times, most notably by the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which limits the use of military personnel under federal command for law enforcement purposes within the United States. Modern Usage: The Insurrection Act has been invoked on several occasions throughout history, including during the Los Angeles riots in 1992 and in response to Hurricane Hugo in 1989. America has become a third world country. Our major cities are not even safe to walk in any more. Have you seen this from Chicago? Chicago has fallen. Third worldShithole! pic.twitter.com/Z2WoZybUVa — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) September 17, 2023 Or this filth from New York? Breaking News: Democrats Piss Themselves on Trains Now... https://t.co/oBdPGn6RF7 — Rob/1865 (@Rob1865_) November 28, 2023 Or this TERRIFYING attack on a woman in Chicago? THIS IS THIRD WORLD COUNTRY SHIT! Lock these thugs up or just execute them if needed....YES or NO? https://t.co/tAUZsRlQsA — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) November 28, 2023 Time to clean it up, and President Trump is just the man to do it. Here is The Associated Press: “You look at these great cities Los Angeles, San Francisco you look at what’s happening to our country… We cannot let it happen any longer. And one of the other things I’ll do.. Because you know you’re supposed to not be involved in that you just have to be asked by the governor or the mayor to come in… The next time, I’m not waiting. One of the things I did was let them run it, and we’re going to show how bad a job they do,” he added. You can see the clip in this speech at the 1:50:00 mark -- the play button should cue it up right to that spot: Here's more from the Associated Press on how it may play out: The Insurrection Act allows presidents to call on reserve or active-duty military units to respond to unrest in the states, an authority that is not reviewable by the courts. One of its few guardrails merely requires the president to request that the participants disperse. “The principal constraint on the president’s use of the Insurrection Act is basically political, that presidents don’t want to be the guy who sent tanks rolling down Main Street,” said Joseph Nunn, a national security expert with the Brennan Center for Justice. “There’s not much really in the law to stay the president’s hand.” A spokesman for Trump’s campaign did not respond to multiple requests for comment about what authority Trump might use to pursue his plans. Congress passed the act in 1792, just four years after the Constitution was ratified. Nunn said it's an amalgamation of different statutes enacted between then and the 1870s, a time when there was little in the way of local law enforcement. “It is a law that in many ways was created for a country that doesn’t exist anymore,” he said. It also is one of the most substantial exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits using the military for law enforcement purposes. Trump has spoken openly about his plans should he win the presidency, including using the military at the border and in cities struggling with violent crime. His plans also have included using the military against foreign drug cartels, a view echoed by other Republican primary candidates such as Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley, the former U.N. ambassador and South Carolina governor. What do you think? Here's something else that's very interesting.... Apparently, AI was asked what would have happened if President Trump had used the Insurrection Act back in January of 2020 before he left office.... The answer? It would have destroyed the country. In other words, this is EXACTLY why we had to have the 3-year "Pause". President Trump Once Again Explains “The Pause” — This Time In More Detail WOW: AI Confirmed The Insurrection Act Would Have Destroyed The Country This is really interesting... Yes, this is from the Charlie Ward show, but let me explain. I've been fairly public over the years of saying I'm not a big fan of Charlie Ward and I'm a much lesser fan of Simon Parkes. But I do really like Juan O'Savin (which I'm sure is not his real name). I do believe Juan is not just a casual observer, I believe he's probably someone very connected, which I assume from the way he speaks. Just my two cents. I also really appreciate his Biblical world view. Even in this interview he tells people to not "follow a guru" but to get a direct connection to "Our Father in Heaven". And he's made many comments in the past that lead me to believe that's a Biblical, Christian view of God and not what these evil Elites think of their "gods". But anyway, back to the interview. Juan was on with Charlie Ward and Simon Parkes and while I d0n't put too much stock in what they say, I did find the interview fascinating. And most of it was Juan speaking. This is an entirely new interview, so even if you've heard some of his recent interviews there is a lot new in here. Perhaps the most interesting part to me was his discussion of The Insurrection Act and whether or not Trump signed it. Juan says absolutely not. And for the record, President Trump has also said absolutely not. Although it was considered. According to Juan, President Trump was extremely close to signing it but then decided not to after Artificial Intelligence computer modeling ran all the scenarios and determined it would send our country into a new Civil War (65% vs. 35%) -- one we likely would never have recovered from. There's a lot more in here too, including a full breakdown of the Brunson Supreme Court case and why it's likely to succeed. FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING. The whole interview is great (just take Charlie and Simon with a grain of salt, although they do say we're going to have a very good Christmas, so that is encouraging if true). Please enjoy this one... Watch here on Rumble: And speaking of the SCOTUS case, we could use your help! Brunson vs. Adams, Here's What Can You Do To Help! Calling all patriots! Since early November, I've been telling you about the Brunson Brothers Supreme Court case, Brunson v. Adams. I've been telling you it's special. I've been telling you it's unlike all the rest. And now I'm calling for your help... Thanks to WomenImpactingNation and PrayingMantis, I've got a great Q&A for you to answer some of the top questions... ...as well as a call to action that everyone can help with! I know the deadline says December 15, but if you take action today it may still make a big difference. So please jump in. From WIN (originally sourced from PrayingMantis), please read the following: This post is about the very important Brunson vs. Alma S. Adams, et al. case that is now before the U.S. Supreme Court.  Please read to the end! THE INFORMATION BELOW HAS BEEN REPRINTED IN PART WITH PERMISSION FROM PRAYING MANTIS at SUBSTACK.  Links to the full, original posts are at the end of this article, with instructions and links to the letter you are being asked to write and mail ASAP!  It must be mailed BEFORE DECEMBER 15!   If you attended the W.I.N. Christmas party, you heard a little intro to what’s going on.  Perhaps you have read a newsletter or an online media report about how critical this case is to our freedom. You need to know what is at stake and the “Hail Mary” action that we the people must take to save our United States of America republic. Please read this post in its entirety to get a better understanding of what the case is about and how it impacts every American. This is not about party or politics – each person has the right to their own opinions and affiliations. However, we can’t have a functioning society or country unless our voting system is trustworthy. Since 2020, many have investigated and proven electoral malfeasance. Now, after the 2022 midterms, most have realized that our electoral system is untrustworthy.  Without election integrity, we are no longer a free nation. Brunson v. Adams would seem to be a rather obscure case originating in Utah that seeks redress for the violation of Mr. Brunson’s constitutional rights to participate in a fair and honest election. After the overwhelming irregularities observed in the 2020 Presidential election, ordinary citizens questioned the validity of those results. So did some intelligence agencies. In fact, there was palpable concern that foreign entities colluded with domestic actors to subvert the election, affect the outcome, and perform maneuvers favoring of a candidate aligned with their interests.  Some congressmen and a few senators raised valid arguments regarding electoral malfeasance. United States law provides a 10-day pause for Congress to review election-related data when such circumstances arise. This examination should have been conducted prior to certifying the electors that placed Biden into office.  Instead, Congress rushed to install what is arguably a Manchurian candidate into the Presidency of the United States. 291 Representatives failed to perform the legal requirement of reviewing prior to certifying. They intentionally refused to investigate the evidence and conspired to cover it up. By allowing fraudulent votes to be counted, they knowingly mocked their oath to support and protect the U.S. Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Brunson v. Adams focuses not on the outcome of the Presidential election, but on the representatives’ failure to fulfill their legal duties. The defendants should have rejected the electoral college votes from those states with untrustworthy, unreliable, and unworthy electoral systems. Instead, they committed what technically amounts to an act of war and treason. Should Brunson v. Adams succeed, the implications are staggering and life-altering. 291 Representatives, 94 US Senators, President Biden, V.P. Harris, and former V.P. Pence are defendants who could be removed from office and/or tried for high crimes for their participation in this illegal operation. We MUST convey to the Supreme Court our support of case 22-380. We feel our nation has been captured by corruption at the highest levels and are concerned that our country has experienced a national security breach. Our greatest right as citizens has been violated because our vote has been compromised and devalued. We are asking the Justices to grant Brunson’s petition.  So we are IMMEDIATELY writing letters to the Supreme Court of the United States – and are asking you to do the same. Imagine if SCOTUS received one million letters from ordinary Americans.  How about if 10 million students, grandmas, aunts, moms and dads sent them a note of encouragement? If America falls, so does the rest of the world. How about letters from Australia, Canada, Italy, Brazil … China? We must speak up now! While SCOTUS can choose to hear this case at any time, interestingly enough, it is scheduled to be in conference on January 6, 2023. Therefore, it is critical the justices receive a wave of our letters before they break for Christmas – so we must act TODAY.  Tell your friends and family and coworkers.  Have them tell theirs and those folks tell theirs!  Share this post.  Copy-and-paste it into an email.  Forward the W.I.N. newsletter.  Get this out to every single person you know. Here is how (please read all of the instructions): 1) Mail a letter to SCOTUS. The text is provided in the link but please make sure you add a P.S. Handwritten is best since personalization is extremely meaningful. Have your kids and grandkids send a letter as well. Ask them to draw a picture or decorate with stickers! CLICK HERE to go directly to the document which you can print, edit, personalize and mail. 2) Copy your letter. 3) MAIL the original to the Supreme Court and MAIL a copy to the Brunson Brothers. This is critical so the Brunson legal team can validate the amount of letters the Supreme Court is receiving. Supreme Court Address: Supreme Court of the United States Attn: Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr. and All Associate Justices 1 First Street N.E. Washington, DC 20543. Brunson Address: Loy & Raland Brunson 4287 South Harris Blvd. Apt. 132 Ogden, Utah 84403 4) Consider donating to the Brunsons to help pay for the legal costs of this litigation – CLICK HERE. 5) Send these instructions to your friends and family. Have letter-writing parties or host a zoom call to write letters together. Be creative, action-oriented, and effective! Reach out overseas: America may be the last light out unless we all come together. 6) Time is of essence. Please mail NOW. CLICK TO VIEW/DOWNLOAD SCOTUS 22-380 SAMPLE LETTER in PDF format To read the original posts with greater detail, go to: https://prayingmantis.substack.com/p/scotus-save-us Here is the link to the letter itself: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vpq-CWbB7mAihrYbmFNVM0FDfIKKWWkg2Nt8HQSZ2oA/edit# Here is a link to a site with a chronology of the lawsuit: https://www.newstreason.com/post/supreme-court-brunson-v-alma-s-adams-et-al-case-summary-and-timeline DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH – THIS CASE IS ALL OVER THE INTERNET. BUT GET THOSE LETTERS WRITTEN TODAY! This thing is really heating up... When I very first reported on it, people didn't even think it could be real. Now? Now EVERYONE is talking about it... Mike Huckabee: "I Guarantee This Supreme Court Case Is Real..." When I first started covering the Brunson Brothers Supreme Court case, I got a lot of doubts and complaints. Grumbling, really. I compared it to the Israelites in the desert. Fair comparison. People saying the case wasn't real... People asking why The Gateway Pundit and Epoch Times hadn't covered it if it was real.... All this despite the fact that I showed the Supreme Court website and docket confirming it was real. Still, grumbling. And then? Then the Gateway Pundit covered it. Then the Epoch Times covered it. Now? Now Mike Huckabee is covering it, and not only that he says "I guarantee this is real". The leader paving the way always gets some slings and arrows in his back, and that's ok.  I'm used to it. But I was right and you should trust my reporting. We don't run with a story if it's not verified. And I had this one locked down to the "T". As in, President T may be returning soon! Here is Mike Huckabee: The Supreme Court has agreed to a hearing for a case that could conceivably --- PLEASE consider this the longest of long shots --- overturn the election of 2020, throw out all the legislators who voted to certify the results and leave them ineligible to run for office ever again, even for town dogcatcher. The case has been added to the docket for, appropriately, January 6, 2023. There’s essentially no media attention being given to this case; most news outlets find it much too hot to touch. But the heat doesn’t faze us; we keep a pair of oven mitts close by for times like this. As Joshua Philipp reported in a podcast for EPOCH TV, the case Brunson v. Alma Adams, et. al., alleges that members of Congress who voted against the proposed 10-day audit of the 2020 elections and certifying those results --- with no investigation after being “properly warned” of a credible threat from enemies of the Constitution --- were violating their oath of office to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic.” It says that “this action unilaterally violated the rights of every citizen of the U.S.A. and perhaps the rights of every person living, and all courts of law.” If SCOTUS ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, the remedy would conceivably involve removing the sitting President and Vice President and all those representatives and empower the Court to authorize the swearing-in of the rightful President and Vice President. Not kidding; that’s the remedy the plaintiffs are asking for. The Brunson brothers are an interesting group –- literally a band of brothers, as they play in a trumpet band. Here they are, with their summary of the suit, which was reportedly written by just themselves, without legal counsel (!). https://ralandbrunson.com Note: Philipp’s report was made before SCOTUS agreed to hear the case, and he said then he would be “very surprised” if they did. So I guess he’s very surprised right now. Actually, I am, too, considering the way the Court refused to look into those very allegations in the weeks after the election, when they were brought by President Trump. (Of course, now we know much more about the lengths to which Trump’s enemies went to interfere with the outcome. Maybe enough Justices are feeling some guilt right now about calling the issue “moot.”) Philipp also pointed out that this segment of his show, “Crossroads,” would not be allowed on YouTube. (Good news, though: he can now post the link on Twitter!) We’ll include the EPOCH TV link here… https://www.theepochtimes.com/supreme-court-weighs-on-brunson-v-alma-case-that-could-overturn-2020-election_4907648.html The argument in this case is that by not looking into serious allegations of election fraud, those who voted to confirm the results of the 2020 election broke their oath of office and are ineligible to run for any elected office again. To give you an idea of the scope of the potential fallout, Kamala Harris is in that group, and so is Mike Pence. This started as two separate lawsuits brought by four brothers in Utah, but only one of them is advancing to the Supreme Court. To get it there, the brothers bypassed the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, where it was stalled, by saying in a cover letter that this suit was a matter of national security. The Court was apparently so interested in this case that they received a personal call from the Court clerk asking how soon they could get their documents together. The brothers got it all to them in one week. The suit names President Biden, VP Harris, former VP Pence, and 385 members of Congress, and, no, that is not a typo. Those are all the members who voted against a proposition for them to investigate claims that “enemies of the Constitution rigged the 2020 election.” So, this case is NOT about whether or not election fraud occurred. It’s about whether or not these people violated their oath by failing to investigate credible allegations of election rigging by enemies of the Constitution –- allegations that had been made by over a hundred of their own colleagues. In their words: “Is this about a rigged election? No, it’s about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation, thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES.” The suit says this violation is an act of treason and fraud. “A successfully rigged election has the same effect as an act of war: to place into power whom the victor wants, which in this case is Biden, who, if not stopped immediately, will continue to destroy the fundamental freedoms of Brunson and all U.S. Citizens and courts of law.” “When the allegations of a rigged election came forward, the Respondents had a duty under law to investigate it or be removed from office.” According to Philipp, a finding for the plaintiffs would “also restore Trump to office because he would have been the legitimate candidate.” We’re not yet sure how that part of the argument works but are researching. Even if a majority of the Justices found merit in this case, would they be willing to do something this huge? They would be keeping in mind the potential consequences and, of course, possible effects on the balance of power. If this happened, it would be the wildest things ever to happen within our government --- a purge, really, which, I have to admit, sounds pretty great with the state our country is currently in. But you know the saying, if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is. And here is more of my original reporting: TRUMPet Supreme Court Case Moving Forward! Several weeks ago, I was one of the ONLY websites to tell you about Brunson v. Adams, the Supreme Court Case that may upend the 2020 election steal. In fact, I was so early that many people doubted it was real. Our articles are ALWAYS real. If I can't vet the article, I don't run it. And this was 100% vetted by the best source possible: the Supreme Court website! That's kind of what it means to be a journalist.... You take in all the information and sometimes you break the story! That's what we did here. So much so that one comment I read to my article said: I don't think it's real, I haven't seen the Epoch Times or Gateway Pundit cover it! Well....with all apologies to the commenter, the Epoch Times covered it shortly thereafter and The Gateway Pundit covered it today....again. I'm still waiting for my apology from the commenter (I forget who it was, they are not memorable) but I won't stay up all night waiting. In all seriousness, the story is VERY real and very exciting! From my friends at The Gateway Pundit, here is Tim Canova: While there has been much public attention on the U.S. Supreme Court’s present consideration of the “independent state legislature” theory in Moore v. Harper involving North Carolina’s redistricting, that case would not immediately upend the 2020 Presidential Election. In contrast, a little-known case that appeared recently on the Court docket could do just that. The case of Brunson v. Adams, not even reported in the mainstream media, was filed pro se by ordinary American citizens – four brothers from Utah — seeking the removal of President Biden and Vice President Harris, along with 291 U.S. Representatives and 94 U.S. Senators who voted to certify the Electors to the Electoral College on January 6, 2021 without first investigating serious allegations of election fraud in half a dozen states and foreign election interference and breach of national security in the 2020 Presidential Election. The outcome of such relief would presumably be to restore Donald Trump to the presidency. The important national security interests implicated in this case allowed the Brunsons to bypass an appeal that was frozen at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and get the case to the Supreme Court which has now scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023. The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four Justices to move the case forward. It seems astounding that the Court would wade into such waters two years to the day after the Congressional vote to install Joe Biden as President. But these are not normal times. Democrats may well push legislation in this month’s lame duck session of Congress to impose term limits and a mandatory retirement age for Justices, and thereby open the door to packing the Court. Such a course would seem to be clear violations of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution which provides that Justices “shall hold their Offices during good Behavior.” In addition to such institutional threats to the Supreme Court, several Justices and their families have been living under constant threats to their personal security since the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Perhaps these institutional and security threats have provided powerful incentives for the Court to put Brunson v. Adams on its dockets as a shield to deter any efforts by the lame duck Congress to infringe on the Court’s independence. Or perhaps conservatives on the Court are serious about using the Brunson case as a sword to remove public officials who they believe have violated their constitutional Oaths of office by rubber-stamping Electors on Jan. 6th without first conducting any investigation of serious allegations of election fraud and foreign election interference. Moreover, recent weeks have brought a cascade of news suggesting the likelihood of an impending constitutional crisis that could be difficult to resolve without the Court’s intervention. It is now clear that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was colluding with social media giants Twitter and Facebook to censor news of Hunter Biden’s laptop in the weeks leading up to the 2020 election – a most egregious First Amendment violation intended to rig the election outcome and perhaps to install an unaccountable and criminal puppet government. Meanwhile, the January 6th committee may soon send a criminal referral to the Justice Department to arrest President Trump even though his reinstated tweets are a reminder that he was not calling for insurrection but for peaceful protest on January 6th. More recently, the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was reportedly working with Big Tech to censor election critics.   Supreme Court Justices may well see these approaching storm clouds and conclude that the Court’s intervention is necessary to prevent larger civil unrest resulting from constitutional violations that are undermining public trust and confidence in the outcomes of both the 2020 and 2022 elections. When criminals break the law — state and federal statutes — to rig an election, we are dependent on prosecutions by law enforcement agencies that have sadly become politicized and complicit. When they break the Constitution — the supreme law of the land — to rig an election, the only recourse may be the Supreme Court or military tribunals.   As the Brunson lawsuit argues, all of Congress was put on notice prior to its January 6th vote by more than a hundred of its own members detailing serious allegations of election frauds and calling for creation of an electoral commission to investigate the allegations. Moreover, the Office of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) was required to submit a report on foreign threats to the 2020 Presidential election by December 18, 2020. That deadline was set by executive order and by Congress itself. When December 18th came and went without ODNI submitting its report, Congress should have started asking questions and investigating. In fact, DNI John Ratcliffe announced on that day that the 17 U.S. intelligence agencies he was overseeing had found evidence of foreign election interference but were split as to its significance and whether such breach of national security was sufficient to overturn the outcome of the election. And yet there was no action whatsoever by Congress, no inquiry and no investigation. Instead, Congress approved the possibly fraudulent election results on January 6th without asking any questions of the DNI and the Intelligence Community. When the results of the 1876 presidential election were in doubt, Congress created a special Electoral Commission made up of five House members, five Senators, and five Supreme Court Justices to investigate. In contrast, in early 2021 Congress had nearly two weeks to investigate before the January 20th date of the Presidential Inauguration. Had Congress waited even just one more day to January 7th, they would have received the long-awaited ODNI report reflecting a split in the Intelligence Community and the DNI’s own conclusion that the People’s Republic of China had interfered to influence the outcome of the presidential election. As Dr. Barry A. Zulauf, the Analytic Ombudsman for the Intelligence Community, concluded at the time, the Intelligence Community shamefully delayed their findings until after the January 6th Electoral College certification by Congress because of their political disagreements with the Trump administration. This paints a picture of collusion and conspiracy involving members of Congress and U.S. intelligence agencies to coverup evidence of foreign election interference and constituting the crime of High Treason. The Brunson lawsuit does not claim the election was stolen, merely that a large majority of Congress, by failing to investigate such serious allegations of election rigging and breaches of national security, violated their Oaths to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic – an Oath also taken by Supreme Court Justices and members of the U.S. military. And if all of this is new to you, please allow me to bring you up to speed! Here was my most recent post explaining it all: TRUMPet Brothers Supreme Court Case Update! Simplified and Next Steps EXPLAINED! I continue to be laser focused on this Brunson Brothers Supreme Court case... And the more I learn the more I am blown away! And the more I am encouraged we have something very big happening here! I have a simplified summary of the case for everyone who is still confused and I also have an INCREDIBLE video you need to watch. Plus my take on what the next key date is... First, a few housekeeping comments. I know there is general fatigue out there. People are tired. People are weary. We've seen disappointments and defeats along the way and I fear that just as the victory is about to present itself, too many people have fallen asleep, became complacent or became downright grumpy! Take heart friends! I can't guarantee this case will be successful, but it does seem to have almost everything going for it. And I can promise you this: God will not fail.  That part I know. There might be a delay --- and how appropriate this is ADVENT season --- the season of waiting. Did you know that? Speaking of the Bible, I have a general warning and caution for anyone who has fallen asleep, became complacent or outright grumpy, and that warning is this: make sure you don't become an Exodus 14:11-12 Israelite. Exodus 14:11-12 They said to Moses, “Why did you bring us out of Egypt? Did you bring us out here in the desert to die? We could have died peacefully in Egypt; there were plenty of graves in Egypt. We told you this would happen! In Egypt we said, ‘Please don’t bother us. Let us stay and serve the Egyptians.’ It would have been better for us to stay and be slaves than to come out here and die in the desert.” The parallels are so apt.We've been calling for a Red Sea moment since the 2020 election was stolen, and now with our backs against the waters what I read in the comments section sounds EXACTLY like what I read above from Exodus.Don't go there.Take heart!Take hope!Hold strong!Stay in the fight!Now let me give you my short paraphrase of the case, as well as a short summary from The American Thinker and then I'll roll into a video that you HAVE TO see.Here's the short summary... You have 4 brothers, the Brunson Brothers. A couple of the brothers are attorneys. All four of the brothers are semi-famous for their TRUMPet playing. How cool is that? You can't make this stuff up. So the four brothers start asking the lawyer brothers what can be done about the election fraud. They come up with a theory. They file in Utah. That case stalls out in the 10th Circuit, intentional delay. So then they fine a "loophole" to file it directly to the Supreme Court. And guess what? 95% of cases are never taken by the Supreme Court.  They're simply ignored, and if they get ignored they are essentially rejected. The SCOTUS only chooses to accept a very small amount of cases filed. But in this case they don't ignore this one. In fact, according to reports, the Clerk of the Supreme Court reaches out to the brothers and tells them they need to make a couple changes to their filing...and they ask how quickly that can happen. The brothers say 2-4 weeks and the Court says please hurry. The brothers get it done in 1 week, and almost as soon as it's filed it is ACCEPTED by the SCOTUS. This already defies almost all odds. You need 4 Supreme Court Justices to agree to take a case and obviously 5 to win when the case is heard. I've seen comments from people saying: "This court is corrupt, they will never do anything about the election!" Oh how soon you forget! That's why God told Israel to build EBENEZER stones in the Bible...so they would not forget things so quickly! It was less than 6 months ago that this court did the unthinkable: they overturned Roe vs. Wade after 50 years! Did you forget about that? This same court may very well do the same thing here. At least 4 of them have already seemingly tipped their hand that they will. And it may end up being in their own self interest, because if they don't act the court may end up getting "Court Packed" by Liberals in the upcoming lame duck session. Very dangerous. Here's more from The American Thinker: "The Question: How can you support, and defend, the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic?  Answer: You investigate.  If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don't believe there is a threat, you investigate.  How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate?  You can't.  Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution?  Yes.  Where did these serious claims come from?  100 members of Congress.  What was the threat?  That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election.  Is this lawsuit about a rigged election?  No, it's about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation.  Was this a clear violation of their oath?  YES." —Question of Law in the Supreme Court case known as Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al. (Biden, Harris, Pence & 385 Members of Congress) They Broke Their Oaths Loy, Raland, Deron, and Gaynor Brunson all witnessed what they believed to be the theft of the 2020 election and decided to file suit.  However, the interesting approach that they have taken is not to make a formal complaint that the election was stolen; instead, they have chosen to sue members of the U.S. Congress who voted not to investigate whether any election irregularities may have occurred that could have affected the outcome.  In other words, the Brunson Brothers were motivated to sue because these elected officials broketheir oaths to protect the Constitution of the United States. The Brunson Brothers believed that, to support and defend the Constitution, an investigation into possible fraud needed to take place.  Otherwise, how could anyone know with certainty whether the election had been secure? What shocked the Brunson Brothers was that only 147 members of the US Congress voted in support of the proposed ten-day audit of the election before certifying the ballot count of the Electoral College, while, according to the Washington Post, 377 members voted against the proposed ten-day investigation, and eight abstained. Supreme Court Docket No. 22-380 Eventually, the case — Raland J. Brunson, Petitioner v. Alma S. Adams, et al.— ended up on the docket of the Supreme Court .  The "Questions Presented" section, in Raland J. Brunson's Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, goes like this: A serious conflict exists between decisions rendered from this Court and lower appeal courts, along with constitutional provisions and statutes, in deciding whether the trial court has jurisdiction to try the merits of this case. This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States. In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every court in this country.  These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice.  Equitable maxim created by this court, which the lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions. These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be, settled by this Court without delay. So...what is next? That's the really fun part. A ruling could come at ANY minute! Literally today (on a Sunday), tomorrow, Friday, later this month, January....we don't know. But there is nothing stopping the SCOTUS from ruling on this immediately. Here's my speculation....what if it came on December 24? Bo Polny has told us to watch 9/24, 10/24, 11/24 and 12/24. Many people said nothing has happened, except if you look at the filings in this case, they've all happened on the 23/24 of the month: Next up: December 24. Christmas Eve. And what did Kim Clement say about Winter and Christmas? "I will make them happy, says the LORD!" Is this the year we get our big Christmas surprise? Keep reading for the video... The "Trumpet Brothers" Supreme Court Case Could RULE At Any Moment! Simple Explanation! This is gonna blow some minds... A lot of minds I assume! Let's start with October 24 and November 24, two key dates Bo Polny told us to watch. Nothing happened, right? Wrong! It turns out, perhaps the biggest Supreme Court case EVER to be filed was filed on October 24 with reply deadline on November 24 and this thing is going to absolutely blow your mind! We've covered it before, but I know it can be a little confusing so I have the PERFECT explanation of what is going on. Juan O'Savin (who I really like!) was on Elijah Streams today and he laid it all out. I mean, everything! It was SO easy to understand and by the end I couldn't even sit down, I was just pacing in my room with excitement! Folks, it's all coming together. You have to understand this: the Clerk of the Supreme Court contacted the Brunson Brothers and asked them if they could speed up their filing! That is almost unprecedented! The Supreme Court wants this case! And if it's successful, the end result means all 388 people elected in 2020, including Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were elected Unconstitutionally and they DO NOT HOLD public office! They'd be gone in one moment! Just like Bo Polny told us, in a 24 hours period, everything changes! Wiped out! Gone! Trump immediately back in, as if he never left! And here's more beauty to the case: they don't have to prove election fraud! The case is much simpler than that. Oh, and the case comes from four TRUMPet players, and the meaning of "four" is actually very significant, as Juan explains. It's the final act! The final kill shot to the Bull. I don't want to spoil too much, but the Bull = Moloch. Just trust me on this, this will be the BEST video you've seen in a long time, perhaps ever! Yes, I mean that. Watch here on Rumble and then leave a comment and let me know what you think: Here's a lot more about the Brunson Brothers and their Supreme Court case.... Remember, we were one of the FIRST news outlets to report on this! Check this out: For more on that, you can watch their interview below, and near the end they talk about how they play the TRUMPet... What a coincidence! Watch here on Rumble: Now let's wrap things up by getting back to my friend Bo Polny. And if you still have no idea about what I'm talking about, keep reading and I will fill you in... HUGE Update On “Miracle” SCOTUS Case! About a week ago, we reported on a HUGE case to reach the Supreme Court. We were one of the first to do so. In fact, even now not many outlets are reporting on this. But it's 100% real and verified by the court docket. Let me bring everyone up to speed on what the case is first before I give you the updates. It turns out, a huge case (a Petition for a writ of certiorari) was filed with the Supreme Court of the United States  (SCOTUS) just last month... The case is captioned: Raland J. Brunson, Petitioner v. Alma S. Adams, et al. And now the updates! A response was due from the Defendants by November 23, 2022...and we got one! Actually we got a VERY STRANGE one. They didn't ignore it or refuse to reply. They actually filed a reply but waived their right to respond! Yes, you read that and understood that correctly... The Government WAIVED its right to respond. Here is the actual filing (which you can see for yourself is real right here on SupremeCourt.gov): Folks, this is crazy! The case is real. It's moving forward. The Government just WAIVED its rights. And the stage is set for something truly epic! Bo Polny Predicted The Bitcoin Crash TO THE DAY, Here's What Comes Next... I had Bo Polny back on my show today and we talked a LOT about crypto... If you've been following the crypto markets or even just the news in general, you know crypto had an ugly week. Huge crash... Big players and exchanges going bankrupt over night! In fact, I'm working on a big story right now that is set to expose and explain exactly how we may have just uncovered the biggest money laundering operation of all time... And it may just be the thing that brings down Joe Biden and the entire evil regime. Yes, it's that big. Here's a sneak-peak: pic.twitter.com/kS5ZWrfPfs — Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) November 13, 2022 But here's the deal... Bo Polny predicted the EXACT DAY of the crash with perfection! He told his Newsletter subscribers back in October this was coming. I couldn't post about it ahead of time out of respect for the people that subscribe to his Newsletter, but now that it happened and he was right to the very day, I had to have him back on my show to break it all down. We had a blast, and yes we also talked about September 24, October 24 and November 24. You might be surprised to learn some of the details! We also talked about Switzerland, the Egyptian Sphinx on top of Europe, gold and silver and a lot more! Oh and of course Donald Trump! This is so good and I'm excited for you to hear it. Watch safely here on Rumble: Backup here on YouTube: Download Bo's slides for free: https://qrco.de/bdUurf If you want Bo's trading Newsletter, go to https://www.gold2020forecast.com/cryptocurrency-index  use code WLT49. (LIMITED TIME) For access to the Easy Crypto School, go to https://www.easycryptoschool.com  use code WLT49. (LIMITED TIME) The discounts are only good for a short time, so grab them if you want now. The entire history of the Newsletter is available to you when you sign up, which is something I love. You can go back and read and see exactly how accurate Bo has been: And then for anyone who wants to get started but is scared to do it wrong or doesn't know how, this is for you. A trusted guide, from a trusted friend. There's a lot of bad stuff out there, but I'm always happy to send people to Bo's Easy Crypto School: Enjoy!

Is President Trump prepping the general public for the upcoming arrest of Hillary Clinton?  And others? Liz Crokin and many others say yes. In fact, President Trump himself is the one saying “yes”. Allow me to show you…. It all comes from his latest interviews, one with Greg Kelly and one with Sean Hannity. President Trump has previously said when asked about getting retribution on all of his enemies that, quote: “our ultimate retribution is success”. But after the Guilty Conviction came down last week, he’s been asked if his opinion has changed and it seems it has. And I can’t fault him for it one bit. Watch this short clip here: President Trump prepping the public for the arrest of Hillary Clinton. The boomerang will be glorious! pic.twitter.com/ENRrx6hMOi — LIZ CROKIN (@LizCrokin) June 5, 2024 Hannity tried to bait him last night into saying he wouldn’t go after any of his enemies and President Trump did not take the bait: Sean Hannity tries to get President Trump to pledge to end this practice of weaponization of the justice system. Trump doesn’t comply. I love it! pic.twitter.com/b3g5RusM1h — JKash MAGA Queen (@JKash000) June 6, 2024 HANNITY: Will you pledge to restore equal justice, equal application of our laws, and end the weaponization? TRUMP: We have to do it—I don’t want to look naive—what they’ve done to the Republican Party… they want to arrest on no crime the person who won the nomination in a… pic.twitter.com/04EqoDM5pp — Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) June 6, 2024 My friend the Digital Asset Investor points out that not only does this mean Hillary, but never forget the CFO for Hillary’s Campaign and the man who allegedly wrote the check for the Steele Dossier was Gary Gensler, our current head of the (very corrupt) SEC: “You’re going to jail next year @GaryGenslerand no one is coming to save you.”– @twobitidiot pic.twitter.com/EKEKExm5gQ — Digital Asset Investor (@digitalassetbuy) June 6, 2024 As much as I can’t stand Hillary, I may be even more happy to see that smug bastard Gensler locked up! The damage he has done to American finance infrastructure with his illogical war on crypto is horrible. He set us back at least 4 years, but perhaps that was simply the plan all along? The plan for Elizabeth Warren, Gary Gensler and Joe Biden to protect their buddies in the banking world and “TradFi” (Traditional Finance) to give them time to catch up? But back to Trump…. Let’s be very clear about what he’s saying here. He’s saying that he had a very clear path (and evidence) to lock up Hillary Clinton when he took office in 2016 and he choose not to do it. He thought it would be a very terrible thing to lock up the wife of a former President, even if she was guilty as sin. So he chose restraint, even in the face of what would have been fair justice. And I think Hillary is but one example of dozens!  Hundreds even. So despite all the fear mongering and hand wringing about Donald Trump being a dictator and the “New Hitler” if he got into office, his first four years prove the exact opposite. But what do Biden’s four years tell us? A completely weaponized Administration. A DOJ weaponized against Donald Trump, creating crimes where none exist — even writing and rewriting new laws in desperate attempts to try and “Get Trump”. An IRS weaponized against the American people…. An SEC weaponized against American crypto holders… And unlawfulness and Unconstitutional moves at every turn. So now President Trump is asked what will he do? Turn the other cheek (again)? Let them off the hook (again)? How can he do that? Why would he do that? Why would anyone want that? Let me make it very simple and clear here what my position is and what I believe President Trump is saying in these clips:  He is not going to illegally or unlawfully or Unconstitutionally go after anyone.  He is simply going to apply the law and justice equally and fairly.  No more two tiers of justice.  He is not going to find crimes where none exist, but he’s no longer going to look the other way out of some sort of ill-placed allegiance to “decorum” because that ship sailed under the Biden Regime.  The Biden Regime opened that door, not Trump.  And Hannity can wring his hands all he wants and try to get Trump to say he won’t walk through that door, but I don’t think that’s what anyone in MAGA wants.  And I think Hannity just exposed himself once again. Love to know what you think…. RELATED REPORT (from before the Guilty Conviction): President Trump Explains How He’ll Get The “Ultimate Retribution” President Trump, during his Fox News Town Hall, shared his plan for “ultimate retribution”. During his Town Hall, Trump shared “We are run by fools. We’re run by stupid people. But we ran it very smart for four years and we won everything. We won everything.” This led to Fox News host Brett Baierto asking, “You get questions about what a second term’s going to look like when you’re in your rallies. You spend a lot of time talking about retribution, and so there are questions about how much a second term of a Donald Trump presidency, a second term, would be about retribution and looking backward in grievances and how much would be looking forward?” Trump responded, “Well, first of all, a lot of people would say that that’s not so bad. Look what they did. Russia, Russia, Russia hoax, the FBI Twitter hoax, the 51 intelligence agents hoax. All of these different hoaxes that they did. I mean, a lot of people would say, that’s probably quite normal.” He concluded, “I’m not going to have time for retribution,” he continued. “We’re going to make this country so successful. Again, I’m not going to have time for retribution. And remember this, our ultimate retribution is success.” Watch Trump here: TRUMP:“Our ultimate retribution is success” pic.twitter.com/jL8amTXEsc — ALX (@alx) January 11, 2024 Per ABC: Donald Trump has made the idea of “retribution” a centerpiece of his 2024 campaign for the White House, telling supporters at rally after rally he would use the full force of the presidency to go after his perceived political enemies. The rhetoric has stoked alarm among critics that a second Trump term could usher in a wave of authoritarian revenge. MORE: Trump’s unprecedented campaign pitch: Elect me to be your revenge on the government But on Wednesday night, in a sudden change, Trump backed off the message he’s spent nearly a year touting on the stump. “I’m not going to have time for retribution,” Trump said during a town hall with Fox News in Iowa, where he sat down with the network’s Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum as his Republican opponents traded attacks on stage at Drake University. “We’re going to make the country so successful again, I’m not going to have time for retribution,” Trump claimed. “And remember this: our ultimate retribution is success.” ~ President Trump ~ “I’m not going to have time for retribution.” “Our ultimate retribution is success.” pic.twitter.com/gFO9pVrTTM — Gary D (@KMGGaryde) January 11, 2024 Per The Daily Wire: Former President Donald Trump said he will not “have time for retribution” during a second term in the White House in an apparent walk-back of comments made earlier in the campaign. Trump sat with Fox News hosts Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum during a live town hall event in Iowa on Wednesday evening. The Trump event took place as CNN held a debate between Trump’s Republican primary foes, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley.

Earlier this morning, we brought you this report below, where President Trump makes clear he is now open to prosecuting Hillary Clinton…. You remember: “LOCK HER UP!” He passed on it the first time out of a misplaced sense of honoring “decorum” but he’s now making clear he won’t make that mistake again. If you take a swing at the King, you’d damn sure better make sure you kill him otherwise you’re about to see what happens when you don’t come January 2025. President Trump Prepping The Public For The Arrest of Hillary Clinton But it's not just Hillary Clinton. It's many, many others but there's one rat bastard in particular I'd like to focus on right now. Because if you're not in crypto, he's not necessarily a household name, but he should be:  Gary Gensler. Gary has DEEP ties to Hillary Clinton and DEEP ties to "Russiagate". Take a look at this: BREAKING: SEC Chief Gary Gensler Was Hillary’s Campaign CFO During Russia-gate Payments! Gary Gensler is the type of guy who thinks he knows what's better for you than you. A bureaucratic pencil pusher to the core—Gensler could not survive on his own talents if he was forced to... Instead he is forced to nourish himself off the hard work and financial affairs of others—the classic definition of a government parasite according to the late and great Ayn Rand. According to a very illuminating report from ProCoin News, Gary Gensler the current Chair of the S.E.C. was Hillary Clinton's C.F.O. during the Russiagate scandal... This in no way means that he did anything wrong or that this implicates him in that particular scandal, but perhaps further investigation is needed—he was after all the one tasked with handling the money... Here's what we currently know: Wouldn't it be sweet justice if @GaryGensler gets Indicted for being @HillaryClinton's former campaign CFO during the Russia-Gate crime scandal. By the John H Durham report.⚖Sweet Justice & a Level Playing Field#FACTCHECKED pic.twitter.com/HbbmMLagbT — IAM DAVID. (@CarpeDiemXRP) February 16, 2022 Gary Gensler, Biden’s Head of Securities and Exchange Commission, was running Hillary’s campaign finances in 2015-2016, when millions flew from her campaign to entities wt the sole purpose of making up a Russia collusion story that led to spying on candidate and President Trump pic.twitter.com/tpxUb1tqZs — Gigi (@LovelyGigi33) February 14, 2022 ProCoin News explains: Her campaign’s CFO at the time? Gary Gensler. Why is this important? Because many of the allegations made by Durham include the intentional payments of money to promulgate the Russia-gate hoax, and it appears to be inconceivable that those could not have flown through Gensler. Who is @GaryGensler hiding from? The guy NEVER leaves his house & his curtains are closed in broad daylight.. Wait till he gets implicated in the @HillaryClinton Russian scandal. Will he do he's Zoom meeting from the penitentiary? https://t.co/0WVJGz03Jh — 3ro3ro (@3r_3ro) February 15, 2022 Things that make you go hmmm. If true it explains a lot. “NEW: Biden’s SEC Chairman Gary Gensler was Hillary Clinton’s Campaign CFO when payments were sent out to Russia-gate participants who spied on Trump and tried to frame him for colluding with Russia” — Nathan (@Nathan050899) February 16, 2022 A 2015 report from CNN praised Gensler: Bart Chilton, a former CFTC commissioner who served alongside Gensler, told CNN that Gensler was an “effective leader” at the agency, adept at juggling the demands of working with lawmakers on Capitol Hill and regulating the financial sector. “Secretary Clinton will be well served by his financial and strategic acumen,” Chilton said. “I know he’s deeply committed to the Secretary, and to her public policy agenda.” He LOOKS like a rat because he is a rat. And I wouldn't shed one tear if this rat ended up in an 8x8 cell. Legally, of course.  After a full and fair trial. President Trump Prepping The Public For The Arrest of Hillary Clinton Is President Trump prepping the general public for the upcoming arrest of Hillary Clinton?  And others? Liz Crokin and many others say yes. In fact, President Trump himself is the one saying "yes". Allow me to show you.... It all comes from his latest interviews, one with Greg Kelly and one with Sean Hannity. President Trump has previously said when asked about getting retribution on all of his enemies that, quote: "our ultimate retribution is success". But after the Guilty Conviction came down last week, he's been asked if his opinion has changed and it seems it has. And I can't fault him for it one bit. Watch this short clip here: President Trump prepping the public for the arrest of Hillary Clinton. The boomerang will be glorious! pic.twitter.com/ENRrx6hMOi — LIZ CROKIN (@LizCrokin) June 5, 2024 Hannity tried to bait him last night into saying he wouldn't go after any of his enemies and President Trump did not take the bait: Sean Hannity tries to get President Trump to pledge to end this practice of weaponization of the justice system. Trump doesn’t comply. I love it! pic.twitter.com/b3g5RusM1h — JKash MAGA Queen (@JKash000) June 6, 2024 HANNITY: Will you pledge to restore equal justice, equal application of our laws, and end the weaponization? TRUMP: We have to do it—I don't want to look naive—what they've done to the Republican Party... they want to arrest on no crime the person who won the nomination in a… pic.twitter.com/04EqoDM5pp — Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) June 6, 2024 My friend the Digital Asset Investor points out that not only does this mean Hillary, but never forget the CFO for Hillary's Campaign and the man who allegedly wrote the check for the Steele Dossier was Gary Gensler, our current head of the (very corrupt) SEC: "You’re going to jail next year @GaryGenslerand no one is coming to save you."- @twobitidiot pic.twitter.com/EKEKExm5gQ — Digital Asset Investor (@digitalassetbuy) June 6, 2024 As much as I can't stand Hillary, I may be even more happy to see that smug bastard Gensler locked up! The damage he has done to American finance infrastructure with his illogical war on crypto is horrible. He set us back at least 4 years, but perhaps that was simply the plan all along? The plan for Elizabeth Warren, Gary Gensler and Joe Biden to protect their buddies in the banking world and "TradFi" (Traditional Finance) to give them time to catch up? But back to Trump.... Let's be very clear about what he's saying here. He's saying that he had a very clear path (and evidence) to lock up Hillary Clinton when he took office in 2016 and he choose not to do it. He thought it would be a very terrible thing to lock up the wife of a former President, even if she was guilty as sin. So he chose restraint, even in the face of what would have been fair justice. And I think Hillary is but one example of dozens!  Hundreds even. So despite all the fear mongering and hand wringing about Donald Trump being a dictator and the "New Hitler" if he got into office, his first four years prove the exact opposite. But what do Biden's four years tell us? A completely weaponized Administration. A DOJ weaponized against Donald Trump, creating crimes where none exist -- even writing and rewriting new laws in desperate attempts to try and "Get Trump". An IRS weaponized against the American people.... An SEC weaponized against American crypto holders... And unlawfulness and Unconstitutional moves at every turn. So now President Trump is asked what will he do? Turn the other cheek (again)? Let them off the hook (again)? How can he do that? Why would he do that? Why would anyone want that? Let me make it very simple and clear here what my position is and what I believe President Trump is saying in these clips:  He is not going to illegally or unlawfully or Unconstitutionally go after anyone.  He is simply going to apply the law and justice equally and fairly.  No more two tiers of justice.  He is not going to find crimes where none exist, but he's no longer going to look the other way out of some sort of ill-placed allegiance to "decorum" because that ship sailed under the Biden Regime.  The Biden Regime opened that door, not Trump.  And Hannity can wring his hands all he wants and try to get Trump to say he won't walk through that door, but I don't think that's what anyone in MAGA wants.  And I think Hannity just exposed himself once again. Love to know what you think.... RELATED REPORT (from before the Guilty Conviction): President Trump Explains How He'll Get The "Ultimate Retribution" President Trump, during his Fox News Town Hall, shared his plan for “ultimate retribution”. During his Town Hall, Trump shared “We are run by fools. We’re run by stupid people. But we ran it very smart for four years and we won everything. We won everything.” This led to Fox News host Brett Baierto asking, “You get questions about what a second term’s going to look like when you’re in your rallies. You spend a lot of time talking about retribution, and so there are questions about how much a second term of a Donald Trump presidency, a second term, would be about retribution and looking backward in grievances and how much would be looking forward?” Trump responded, “Well, first of all, a lot of people would say that that’s not so bad. Look what they did. Russia, Russia, Russia hoax, the FBI Twitter hoax, the 51 intelligence agents hoax. All of these different hoaxes that they did. I mean, a lot of people would say, that’s probably quite normal.” He concluded, “I’m not going to have time for retribution,” he continued. “We’re going to make this country so successful. Again, I’m not going to have time for retribution. And remember this, our ultimate retribution is success.” Watch Trump here: TRUMP:“Our ultimate retribution is success” pic.twitter.com/jL8amTXEsc — ALX (@alx) January 11, 2024 Per ABC: Donald Trump has made the idea of "retribution" a centerpiece of his 2024 campaign for the White House, telling supporters at rally after rally he would use the full force of the presidency to go after his perceived political enemies. The rhetoric has stoked alarm among critics that a second Trump term could usher in a wave of authoritarian revenge. MORE: Trump's unprecedented campaign pitch: Elect me to be your revenge on the government But on Wednesday night, in a sudden change, Trump backed off the message he's spent nearly a year touting on the stump. "I'm not going to have time for retribution," Trump said during a town hall with Fox News in Iowa, where he sat down with the network's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum as his Republican opponents traded attacks on stage at Drake University. "We're going to make the country so successful again, I'm not going to have time for retribution," Trump claimed. "And remember this: our ultimate retribution is success." ~ President Trump ~ “I’m not going to have time for retribution.” “Our ultimate retribution is success.” pic.twitter.com/gFO9pVrTTM — Gary D (@KMGGaryde) January 11, 2024 Per The Daily Wire: Former President Donald Trump said he will not “have time for retribution” during a second term in the White House in an apparent walk-back of comments made earlier in the campaign. Trump sat with Fox News hosts Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum during a live town hall event in Iowa on Wednesday evening. The Trump event took place as CNN held a debate between Trump’s Republican primary foes, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley.