Folks, this is an absolute bombshell…. It seems like no one is happy with CNN’s handling of this debate. From the Mute Button on President Trump…. To the 2 minute live delay…. To an emergency Lawsuit that was filed against CNN just this morning: BREAKING: Lawsuit Filed Against CNN On Eve Of The Debate It seems like EVERYONE is in agreement on one thing: CNN's handling of this debate is a disaster for Free Speech, for open debate and for our Constitution and ideals that have governed this great nation for centuries! And when I say everyone I mean everyone -- even the White House Press Corps which is largely comprised of Far-Left "Fake News". When even the Far-Left Fake News is against what you are doing, you know you have possibly gone too far.  WAY too far. But it's the reason they're giving that is turning lots of heads.... Get this: the White House Press Corps has petitioned CNN to open up the debate studio to reporters (why wasn't this allowed in the first place?  VERY strange!) because, and I quote, they believe there may be a "medical emergency" involving one of the Presidential Candidates! HOLY CRAP! Take a look: BREAKING: White House press corps has petitioned CNN to open up the debate studio to reporters, who for now have to watch a feed from a building across the street, b/c they believe there may be a "medical emergency" involving one of the prez candidates requiring on-scene coverage — Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) June 27, 2024 Now the most natural thought of course would be Joe Biden.... Does he have a heart attack from too many amphetamines? Could he literally die on stage? Or....going even darker and thinking about President Trump.....we have a closed off room with no access not even for reporters....God forbid could we have a Abraham Lincoln or John F. Kennedy moment? Folks, now I'm worried. And remember this.... They (whoever "They is) always hide what they're going to do in plain sight! And they always tell you ahead of time what they're going to do. I don't know why, but I do know in some strange way it seems to be some sort of Law of the Universe that governs "their" behavior. So did they just tell us what's about to happen? And is that why this debate is so early this year? HISTORICALLY, and unprecedentedly, early.... Are we about to see a major campaign-shifting moment where one candidate is no longer in this race after tonight? Let's hope and pray for peace and safety.

The Supreme Court has just issued a major ruling that curtails the Biden admin’s environmental goals. SCOTUS ruled against the Environmental Protection Agency’s “Good Neighbor” rule, which sought top unify 23 state’s differing approaches to air quality management into a single federal rule. Supreme Court halts Biden administration’s “good neighbor” plan to curb smog across states, again limiting government power to protect the environmenthttps://t.co/O14Dg49sUa — CNN Breaking News (@cnnbrk) June 27, 2024 Simon Ateba broke down SCOTUS’ ruling in this post: BREAKING – RULING AGAINST BIDEN’S EPA: The Supreme Court has just now blocked the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Good Neighbor Plan, which aimed to impose uniform emissions-reduction measures on 23 states to improve downwind air quality. NOTE: The Court found that the… pic.twitter.com/oQGCqtzWpQ — Simon Ateba (@simonateba) June 27, 2024 The New York Post explained: The Supreme Court temporarily blocked a Biden administration policy meant to reduce cross-state air pollution Thursday, preventing it from taking effect while lower court litigation played out. In a 5-4 decision, the justices handed a win to three Republican-led states — Indiana, Ohio and West Virginia — as well as US Steel, pipeline operator Kinder Morgan and other steel and fossil fuel industry groups that had contested the policy. The Environmental Protection Agency triggered the challenge in March 2023 when it proposed a rule that would have applied to power plants and other industrial sources of ozone in 23 upwind states whose own emission-reduction plans were found to run afoul of the so-called “Good Neighbor” provision of the federal Clean Air Act. The “Good Neighbor” rule is meant to assist downwind states such as New York, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin comply with federal air quality standards. Writing for the majority, Justice Neil Gorsuch found that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed in their claim that the proposed EPA rule was “arbitrary” and not “reasonably explained. Forbes has more details on what this ruling means: The Supreme Court temporarily blocked the Environmental Protection Agency’s “Good Neighbor” policy on Thursday while litigation moves forward, a ruling that could increase pollution by getting rid of restrictions on air pollution that could flow down to other states. The “Good Neighbor” plan requires states that are “upwind” to reduce pollution that flows into “downwind” states and keeps them from meeting federal air quality standards. After states submitted proposals to comply with the policy, the EPA said in 2023 that 23 states’ plans weren’t adequate, and imposed its own federal implementation plan (FIP) that those states must follow in order to comply with the policy. That FIP gives states a “budget” for their emissions, the government noted in a court brief, and the EPA estimated it would prevent approximately 1,300 premature deaths in 2026 alone and cut emissions from power plants by 50% by 2027, compared with 2021 levels. A number of those states challenged the FIP and the EPA’s rejections of their proposals to comply with the policy, while the agency put the implementation of the FIP on hold in other states, leading to a patchwork of policies across the country. Twelve states asked the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to block the FIP while the litigation played out, which the appeals court refused to do, leading the states to go to the Supreme Court and ask for relief. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to block the FIP while the litigation moves forward, meaning none of the states have to comply with the “Good Neighbor” policy until the litigation is resolved.  

The Trump campaign has released a pair of scathing ads set to air during the debate.

On a conference call with industry analysts on Thursday, Walgreens CEO Tim Wentworth announced the company's intention to eliminate a significant portion of its U.S. stores over the next three years.

Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) said former President Donald Trump’s Republican Party is similar to Nazi Germany’s terror regime. I hate to say it, but since he’s a tyrant, that applies to him more than Donald Trump. Newsom won’t let people in lousy schools have school choice. It mostly affects poor minorities he pretends he cares […] The post Ho Hum Gavin Newsom Compares Trump to Hitler appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.