Good things don’t last long on ABC’s The View. After defending embryos as children earlier in the week‚ staunchly racist and anti-Semitic co-host Sunny Hostin (the descendant of slave owners) found her angle of attack against Republicans on Friday‚ in the wake of an Alabama Supreme Court ruling on in vitro fertilization. According to her‚ the only reason Republicans were now coming out in defense of IVF was because it was how they planned to stave off white people being replaced by minorities. “On the one hand‚ they want you to not have an abortion and then they also don't want you to have more children. Make up your minds. Whatever that means‚” Friday moderator Joy Behar kvetched‚ keeping with the narrative that the GOP was trying to stop people from using IVF‚ for some reason. Before cracking open the lid on her crazy conspiracy theory‚ Hostin suggested she was on the trail of something major. “I think they do want you to have more children and they just not saying the quiet part out loud‚” she teased. “Which is‚ multicultural Americans are going to become the majority population by 2050‚” she began to unwind her crazy. “By 2050‚ the Hispanic Americans are expected to have the most population growth‚ an increase of about six percent‚ while the white population is expected to decrease by about 11 percent. At this time‚ the birth rate for white Americans in this country has been falling since the great recession and it's dropped almost 23 percent between 2007 and 2022.”     Behar immediately realized that what Hostin was saying wasn’t jiving with their narrative that Republicans (who they just thought was just synonymous with white people) were against IVF. Hostin seemed to have confused even herself and she tried to make sense of her own argument‚ and fell back on just calling it a dog whistle: BEHAR: But wouldn’t more white women be getting the IVF? So‚ that increases what they want HOSTIN: That's why they want IVF but they can't say‚ “yes” –  they're coming out sort of against it and not being able to explain why. They want to have more American white children born because the birth rate has gone down. BEHAR: Okay‚ then why do they do this – [Crosstalk] HOSTIN: That’s the quiet part. Hostin’s touting for minorities replacing white people in America flew in the face of previous claims they made on the show almost two years ago when they claimed Replacement Theory was a fringe and dangerous conspiracy theory that wasn’t happening. In response to Hostin‚ co-host Sara Haines dismissed the idea that race was playing a role in why Republicans were coming out against the Alabama Ruling. According to her‚ apathy was their reason. “I don't see this as a race issue. What I see is until it affects them‚ they don't care‚” she insisted. She went on to argue that Republicans just didn’t care about poor people and they only care now because of their wives: So‚ the most disenfranchised among us‚ the poorest among us need to be able to family plan. We need women's health. We need the Planned Parenthoods. We need all of these things. As we shut it down and keep closing the gap as to how far back we'll roll it‚ the people it hurts the most are the poorest. The have-nots. So‚ when it hits the haves in the face because all their wives want to have babies‚ that's when they make change. And guess what they're doing today. They’re taking it back to make to make change. That’s not a race thing‚ that's a money thing. “No‚ but it's race‚” Hostin snapped back. She then expanded this supposed Republican act of bigotry to “the queer community‚ because who uses IVF? The LGBTQ community also using IVF and surrogacy and they don't want that. That's the quiet part that I'm saying out loud!” It’s magical to watch the liberal victimhood Olympics play out in real time. The transcript is below. Click "expand" to read: ABC’s The View February 23‚ 2024 11:04:07 a.m. Eastern (…) JOY BEHAR: On the one hand‚ they want you to not have an abortion and then they also don't want you to have more children. Make up your minds. Whatever that means. SUNNY HOSTIN: I think they do want you to have more children and they just not saying the quiet part out loud. Right? BEHAR: Which is? HOSTIN: Which is‚ multicultural Americans are going to become the majority population by 2050. By 2050‚ the Hispanic Americans are expected to have the most population growth‚ an increase of about six percent‚ while the white population is expected to decrease by about 11 percent. At this time‚ the birth rate for white Americans in this country has been falling since the great recession and it's dropped almost 23 percent between 2007 and 2022. So -- BEHAR: But wouldn’t more white women be getting the IVF? So‚ that increase what they want HOSTIN: That's why they want IVF but they can't say‚ “yes” –  they're coming out sort of against it and not being able to explain why. They want to have more American white children born because the birth rate has gone down. BEHAR: Okay‚ then why do they do this – [Crosstalk] HOSTIN: That’s the quiet part. SARA HAINES: I don't see this as a race issue. What I see is until it affects them‚ they don't care. So‚ the most disenfranchised among us‚ the poorest among us need to be able to family plan. We need women's health. We need the Planned Parenthoods. We need all of these things. As we shut it down and keep closing the gap as to how far back we'll roll it‚ the people it hurts the most are the poorest. The have-nots. So‚ when it hits the haves in the face because all their wives want to have babies‚ that's when they make change. And guess what they're doing today. They’re taking it back to make to make change. That’s not a race thing‚ that's a money thing. HOSTIN: No‚ but it's race and it’s also about the queer community‚ because who uses IVF? The LGBTQ community also using IVF and surrogacy and they don't want that. That's the quiet part that I'm saying out loud. HAINES: I would say it’s because it affects them more than they're thinking of this. (…)

Musician Kid Rock revealed what made him get over his "grudge" against Bud Light after he "became the face" of backlash the beer brand suffered after a failed marketing campaign.The rock artist famously shot at cases of Bud Light in a viral video in which he declared‚ "F**k Bud Light and f**k Anheuser-Busch‚" before adding‚ "Have a nice day!"In addition to admitting that there was way more Bud Light on his property than he imagined‚ the singer‚ whose real name is Robert James Ritchie‚ told comedian Joe Rogan what changed his mind about the beer brand.On Episode #2106 of "The Joe Rogan Experience‚" Ritchie recalled being at a UFC event with Donald Trump when he pointed out the "CEO of Bud Light or Anheuser-Busch" to the former president. "Trump's like‚ 'You want to go talk to him?' which in my mind Trump said 'you want to go f*** with him?' and I'm like yes absolutely."It is unclear whether he was referring to CEO of Anheuser-Busch InBev Michel Doukeris or Brendan Whitworth‚ CEO of the Anheuser-Busch subsidiary."We go over there‚ we're talking to him‚ actually a great conversation‚ and at some point he was telling me how he got the video and he was actually down at Texas doing some hunting‚" the rocker continued. He then told the beverage CEO that he "seem[s] like somebody I'd be friends with‚ that I'd hang out with." Bud Light Boycott Over? Kid Rock Says Yes on Joe Rogan Podcast. — (@) Ritchie revealed that he then invited the CEO to his home in Nashville‚ where the two became friends. "He came with his top team‚ we broke bread‚ got f**ked up on Bud Light ... like did all this fun s***." The multi-diamond-selling artist said that he and the executives also discussed whether there were any collaborations he could make with the brand but decided he "didn't feel comfortable with it‚" despite presenting "some ideas that scare the living s*** out of them."In the end Kid Rock decided he "didn't feel right" taking their money.The Michigan native explained that after his meetings with the beer executives‚ he realized that Anheuser-Busch is a very charitable company that employs many Americans. He also noted that he didn't want to be the reason any truck drivers lost their jobs."I did a little digging and talked to people‚ and I'm like‚ at the end of the day‚ all right‚ they got the message. I'm not someone who holds a f**king grudge his whole life.""When they cross that line and signal to people like myself and many others that they were okay with this transgender thing and more so‚ is this going to get directed at my kids? So you think men should be in women's sports? No‚ that's where I'm drawing the f**king line. Get the f**k out of here." On Joe Rogan‚ Kid Rock explains why he\u2019s dropped his grudge against Bud Light. \n\nHowever‚ the motivations to hire Dylan Mulvaney aren\u2019t discussed \u2014 ESG scores. \n\nForgiveness is fine‚ but shouldn\u2019t the CEO explain why corrupt ESG pressures created the chaos in the first place? — (@) The pair also discussed new partnerships Bud Light has made with the UFC and comedian Shane Gillis‚ a longtime fan of Bud Light who did not join the metaphorical picket line against the company.Rogan and Ritchie both cracked Bud Lights on camera during the podcast‚ at which the rock star recalled that the company sent 100 cases to his house for his birthday. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Attacks on churches in the U.S. have skyrocketed in recent years‚ and the trend appears to be fast accelerating‚ according to a new report from the Family Research Council. The report‚ authored by Arielle Del Turco‚ director of the Center for Religious Liberty at the FRC‚ noted that between 2018 and 2023‚ there were at least 915 acts of hostility against American churches. These depraved actions have ranged from vandalism and arson to gun-related incidents and bomb threats. The states that reportedly accounted for the greatest number of church-related hostilities in the six-year period were California‚ with 91 incidents; Texas‚ with 62 incidents; New York‚ with 58 incidents; and Florida‚ with 47. Things appear to be getting much worse. Between January and November 2023‚ there were reportedly at least 436 such attacks — eight times as many as there were in 2018 — such that 2023 ended up being the worst of all six years reviewed by the FRC. The FRC observed 315 incidents of vandalism last year; 75 arson attacks or attempts; 10 gun-related occurrences; and 20 bomb threats. Among the various documented instances of vandalism in 2023 was the January 2023 smashing of stained glass windows at Holy Nation Church of Memphis‚ Tennessee; the June shredding of Bibles and hymnals at the historically black Fowler United Methodist Church of Annapolis‚ Maryland; and the July inversion of crosses at Most Holy Trinity Catholic Church in El Paso‚ Texas‚ which was also slapped with satanic imagery. In terms of arson‚ attacks ranged from small to massively destructive fires. The Easter Sunday fire set to Faith Lutheran Church in Cambridge‚ Massachusetts‚ for example‚ resulted in substantial damage as well the removal of the church's steeple. Del Turco noted that "although the motivations for many of these acts of hostility remain unknown‚ the effect is unmistakable: religious intimidation." The beheading of a statue of religious significance may‚ for example‚ leave congregants "disturbed and upset." Other acts of hostility may alternatively "cause congregants or church leaders to feel unsafe‚" thereby interrupting the normal work of the church‚ according the report. "They send the message that churches are not wanted in the community or respected in general. Our culture is demonstrating a growing disdain for Christianity and core Christian beliefs‚ and acts of hostility against churches could be a physical manifestation of that‚" continued Turco. "Regardless of the motivations of these crimes‚ everyone should treat churches and all houses of worship with respect and affirm the importance of religious freedom for all Americans." The report posits that the increase in hostility against churches may point to a "larger societal problem of marginalizing core Christian beliefs‚ including those that touch on hot-button political issues related to human dignity and sexuality." While frequently targets for radicals on account of their congregants' fidelity to tradition‚ churches also appear to be a reflexive scapegoat for leftists and other extremists. Radicals in the U.S. seized upon the 2020 death of George Floyd as an excuse to lash out at their perceived foes‚ which turned out in many cases to be Christians and their places of worship. Leftists did likewise in 2022 in the lead-up to and wake of the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision‚ attacking churches and pro-life pregnancy centers alike. This reflex appears elsewhere in the West. For instance‚ in Canada‚ at least 68 churches were razed‚ desecrated‚ or vandalized in 2021 after activists‚ the northern nation's liberal media‚ and political elites hyped the mass graves hoax. The hoax‚ fully embraced by the Trudeau regime‚ alleged that mass graves had been discovered at the sites of former Indian residential schools that had been administered by Christian groups. The claims‚ which were dubious to begin with‚ were subsequently debunked‚ but not before radicals torched Catholic and Anglican churches across the country. Tony Perkins‚ president of the FRC and a former chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom‚ said of the findings in the report‚ "There is a common connection between the growing religious persecution abroad and the rapidly increasing hostility toward churches here at home: our government's policies." "The indifference abroad to the fundamental freedom of religion is rivaled only by the increasing antagonism toward the moral absolutes taught by Bible-believing churches here in the U.S.‚" continued Perkins‚ "which is fomenting this environment of hostility toward churches." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

A few numbers paint a grim picture of what’s really happening at the border. According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection‚ federal agents encountered approximately 2.5 million migrants in 2023 compared to 850‚000 migrant encounters in 2019. This sharp increase has dramatically worsened the humanitarian crisis. Small border towns are overburdened due to a lack of resources. Meanwhile‚ migrants endure deplorable conditions. Anger is brewing toward the federal government for its failure to secure the border‚ as well as fears of an unchecked influx of criminals and narcotics — fears that are far from baseless. Shipping migrants across the country does not prevent suffering — it simply shifts the suffering elsewhere. In 2023‚ border officials seized 26‚700 pounds of fentanyl — a shocking 480% increase since 2020. Nearly 99% of it came though the southern border. Overdose deaths topped 112‚000 for the first time in history last year‚ and experts say fentanyl is fueling these drug deaths. Human trafficking is another major issue arising from our chaotic border policy. Mark Morgan‚ the former acting commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection‚ said the United States is “complicit in the world’s largest human smuggling and trafficking operation in modern history.” In 2022‚ arrests for human trafficking rose 50%‚ and convictions rose 80%. A whopping 72% of those trafficked in the United States are immigrants. The Coalition Against Trafficking in Women estimated that 60% of unaccompanied‚ undocumented children are caught and exploited by cartels through pornography and drug trafficking. To put that in perspective‚ in 2022‚ more than 150‚000 unaccompanied children crossed the southern border‚ which would suggest 90‚000 of them are being exploited in unspeakable ways. The government is undoubtedly failing in its duty to protect innocent lives‚ and chaotic immigration laws hurt people on both sides of the border. But a disturbing trend has emerged as an extreme reaction to the government’s failure: the dehumanizing treatment of migrants in America. Spreading the problem In 2022‚ Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and Texas Governor Greg Abbott began sending migrants to blue cities‚ including New York City and Chicago‚ where they are presumably “wanted.” But these cities are not equipped to care for such large numbers of immigrants. Recently‚ New York City evacuated a high school to accommodate some 2‚000 migrants — including families with children — because of extreme weather forecasts. These people were living in tents on a known flood plain for months. Last month‚ Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker asked Abbott to refrain from sending more migrants to the city amidst sub-zero temperatures. Abbott declined‚ citing Chicago’s self-proclaimed nickname of “The Welcoming City‚” and pointed out that Texas was also facing bitterly cold temperatures. Many immigrants in Chicago are finding themselves in an impossible situation. Due to lack of available beds‚ Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson implemented a 60-day limit on how long migrants can stay in the shelters. The first round of evictions scheduled to begin in mid-March will affect over 5‚000 people. If the Biden administration has no plans to deport these people any time soon‚ they will need somewhere to live and somewhere to work. About half of the migrants in Chicago’s shelters are not eligible for rental assistance because they arrived after Illinois cut the program. Anyone who arrived after July 31 is not eligible for temporary protected status‚ which includes the ability to obtain work authorization. This means most migrants will wait about six months after filing asylum claims to receive a work permit. In reality‚ though‚ it is virtually impossible for many of these migrants to leave the shelter system and support themselves. Those who cannot find a job or afford rent will have to reapply for shelters. A crying need for reforms These Republican governors have undoubtedly been dealt a tough hand. But shipping migrants across the country does not prevent suffering — it simply shifts the suffering elsewhere‚ fuels division between political parties and states‚ and drives hostility between Americans and migrants. It treats human beings like cargo — unwanted‚ unloved outcasts — and only weakens America’s already crumbling cities. Plus‚ by sending migrants even farther into the country‚ these policies worsen the very problem they purportedly seek to resolve. Any ideology that objectifies human beings‚ or uses them as a means to an end‚ is evil. Which is why we desperately need a national solution that will protect Americans from foreign threats and uphold the intrinsic value of every human being. Such a solution would require our federal and state leaders to put partisan politics aside in favor of the dignity of human life. First and foremost‚ our government has a duty to protect its citizens. A wall could help secure the border and keep out human traffickers and narcotics. Red states should stop sending busloads of people deeper into the country to cities that cannot accommodate them and perhaps instead coordinate with charities‚ states‚ and even other safe countries to find places that can help them. Additionally‚ the legal immigration system desperately needs reform. In 2019‚ the average wait time for applicants of family-sponsored or employment-based migrants was nearly six years — up from about two years in 1991. Yet most migrants who claim asylum at the border get released into American cities in less than 72 hours. For people in search of a better life‚ there is virtually no motivation to take the legal pathway. It is not charitable for the federal government to allow migrants to break the law and enter the country with virtually no system in place to support them once they’re here. But it also isn’t charitable to send these people to cities that cannot accommodate them. America‚ broken as it is‚ remains a beacon of hope for people worldwide. Lawmakers should pursue policies that will maintain that light and uphold the dignity of every person.

One of the unintended consequences of the Biden administration's willful and malicious attack on our way of life often gets ignored: how the ongoing border crisis is undermining our nation’s education system. Fortunately‚ our public education system just dodged a major bullet in the form of the Senate’s bipartisan “border security” bill. After all the noise and confrontation coming out of the upper house these past few weeks over the much-anticipated legislation‚ the measure failed when most Republicans in the chamber eventually realized that the embarrassment of a bill would have done nothing to secure the border. Rather‚ it would have codified the practice of catch-and-release. So what does the border crisis have to do with education? Plenty. Though it may not be a polite fact to mention any more‚ it remains a fact nonetheless that illegal immigration puts a huge strain on schools and puts American children at a disadvantage. That has been the case for several decades‚ and the impact of this man-made border crisis has only exacerbated the problem. As I explained in my recent message to Oklahoma’s federal lawmakers‚ the crisis poses a direct and immediate threat to our schools. A 2023 study by the Federation for American Immigration Reform concluded that educating illegal immigrants imposes a massive unfunded mandate on U.S. public schools. “Currently‚ 5.1 million students — or more than 10 percent of all students in American public schools — are designated as LEP [limited English proficiency]‚” the report explains. “Despite this‚ only 370‚000 of teachers hold the proper certifications to adequately educate them‚ according to the U.S. Department of Education.” Further‚ the study adds that some 100‚000 instructors are trying to fill the gap by standing in as LEP teachers without certification. And that’s just one example of the strain schools currently face. A Center for Immigration Studies report from June 2023 points out that most illegal immigrants settle in areas that are already high-poverty areas‚ straining the already-limited resources available to already-disadvantaged American students. As long as we are supporting education with our tax dollars‚ illegal immigration is going to put an unjust and preventable strain on resources meant for the children of people who are here in the country legally. Beyond the financial impact‚ the much more personal and important impact is the influx of fentanyl through the border that is poisoning teenage students. The median monthly overdose deaths among adolescents increased 109% from 2019 to 2021‚ and 84% of all fatal overdoses for adolescents ages 10 to 19 in 2021 involved fentanyl. Overdose deaths topped 112‚000 in a 12-month period for the first time ever in 2023. In my state alone‚ fentanyl deaths increased 12-fold from 2019 to 2022‚ according to the Oklahoma Department of Health. All of this is a complete travesty of what American education is supposed to be. Unlike Joe Biden‚ whose handlers are actively engaged in a clear attempt to destroy our way of life‚ Donald Trump understands that America is supposed to work for Americans. It’s a simple concept but one that seems to be completely forgotten by our ruling class. Public education is not just a simple public service. It serves a higher purpose: the preparation of young Americans for participation in our economy and in the public life of a representative republic. As James Madison put it‚ “A diffusion of knowledge is the only guardian of true liberty.” Put simply‚ just as we should not bankrupt ourselves with endless foreign intervention at the expense of our current and future taxpayers‚ we cannot allow our classrooms to be overwhelmed at the expense of current students and future citizens. We need and deserve a secure border. We need and deserve a school system that serves Americans‚ their children‚ and our future interests. We don’t deserve to be lied to by career politicians offering us a mass migration bill in the name of border security. What we need instead is true leadership that will put America‚ and its students‚ first.

Monique Hicks (aka Mo’Nique) is a stand-up comedian and Oscar-winning actress. She’s also apparently a political theorist‚ because she recently made the clearest argument against the politics of racial grievance and guilt I have ever heard — all without ever mentioning skin color. For years‚ Mo’Nique has claimed that Oprah Winfrey and Tyler Perry owe her an apology — and financial compensation — for costing her opportunities in Hollywood. She recently repeated her claim about both media moguls on Shannon Sharpe’s popular “Club Shay Shay” podcast. She was also open with Sharpe about the complicated relationship she has with her oldest child‚ a son named Shalon. Even if they don’t use language as harsh as Mo’Nique’s‚ many parents have the same sentiment toward their kids: “Get over it and live your life!” Shalon responded to his mother’s viral “Club Shay Shay” interview with a video laying out the reasons the two are estranged and noted Mo’Nique’s shortcomings as a mother. Mo’Nique and her husband‚ Sidney Hicks‚ responded to him in subsequent videos and even posted text messages to dispute the notion that the comedian is a distant‚ unloving mother. But the nature of this family drama changed during a recent comedy show‚ in which Mo’Nique punctuated her refusal to be beholden to her son’s feelings with a declaration that sounded like a secret recording of a 1950s Klan rally: “F*** that n****!” And just like that‚ Mo’Nique moved from sympathetic victim to callous victimizer in the minds of some of her supporters. On a broader level‚ she also demonstrated why the progressive tendency to outsource racial uplift is doomed to fail. The equity industrial complex is built on two main assumptions. The first is the belief that all disparities in social outcomes between blacks and whites are due to racial discrimination. The second is that white people have a special obligation to use their collective “privilege” and power to improve the economic and social conditions of black Americans by closing those gaps. But if a mother worth millions doesn’t feel compelled to spend the rest of her life apologizing and making amends for the mistakes she made while raising her son‚ why would anyone expect total strangers to do the same for people based on historical discrimination and skin color? The truth is that people who don’t know you and have never harmed you have no moral obligation to prostrate themselves as you blame them for everything you don’t like about your life. The fact that the titans of America’s racial grievance industry can get random white people to get on their knees and apologize for the unspecified sins of others tells you how deeply entrenched this mind virus has become. As Mo’Nique proved‚ most parents — regardless of race — don’t spend every waking moment trying to make up for every mistake their children believe they made. At best‚ some will acknowledge major issues like drug abuse and abandonment. But many adult children never get the validation they seek from their parents. And even if they don’t use language as harsh as Mo’Nique’s‚ many parents have the same sentiment toward their kids: “Get over it and live your life!” But somehow‚ the civil rights establishment sells the black masses on the notion that benevolent white people can be harassed‚ cajoled‚ and guilted into taking responsibility for our social outcomes. This is why the NAACP would rather get white Hollywood stars to “take responsibility” for racism than highlight black fathers‚ coaches‚ pastors‚ and business owners who are taking responsibility for their families and communities.What makes things even worse is what civil rights organizations and “racial justice” activists don’t say. They never talk about the connection between marriage‚ family structure‚ and social outcomes. They also don’t promote marriage and family as a social good and requirement for sustainable racial uplift. And they certainly don’t tell the watching world a black boy in Brooklyn growing up with his married father and mother in a loving‚ working-class home is far more “privileged” than a white classmate with an absent father and a disinterested mother. Instead‚ they dismiss the importance of parents while demanding that white people treat us like perpetual children. Modern race discourse is governed by the symbiotic relationship between whites seeking absolution for sins they didn’t commit and blacks seeking compensation for injustices they didn’t endure. This is why some liberal white women will pay thousands of dollars to be told how racist they are — sometimes in their own homes. Some people — both black and white — see this as a sign of progress. I don’t. I find it undignified and embarrassing‚ both for the white people who participate in these humiliation rituals and the black people who prioritize external validation over personal agency. Mo’Nique shows why this approach is bound to fail. Most people have no interest in spending their lives apologizing for things they’ve done in the past. They certainly won’t go to the grave repenting for the sins of others. Her son also is learning a valuable lesson: You can’t stop living your life just because you didn’t get the recognition‚ apology‚ and affirmation you desire. Parents can put their children on a path to intergenerational success — or failure. Some do a better job at it than others‚ but even the pain of our past can be used to build something better for our own children in the future.

New York’s $355 million civil fraud charge against former President Donald Trump just got worse — and the charge itself was already unprecedented. When all is said and done‚ the lawsuit will end up costing Trump over $400 million. The judge who ordered the ruling has just denied a request from Trump’s lawyers to delay formalizing his decision. In an email to Trump’s legal team‚ Judge Arthur Engoron of the New York State Supreme Court wrote‚ “You have failed to explain‚ much less justify‚ any basis for a stay.” “I am confident that the Appellate Division will protect your appellate rights‚” he added. Glenn Beck believes Trump is going to have to sell real estate in order to pay. “This is so much money that he’s going to have to put up probably real estate and sell some real estate to be able to pay for this‚” he says. “You have to put that money into a bond‚ and then you have a bond holder holding it for you‚ and you have to pay them an additional fee‚ and then‚ hopefully‚ you win the appeal and eventually don’t have to pay it‚ but I mean‚ it’ll still cost you about 50 million‚” Glenn adds. Both Glenn and Stu Burguiere are under the impression that this is 100% a case of political persecution‚ and it can be proven. “It’s actually provable‚” Stu says‚ adding‚ “He’s running for the president of the United States‚ they’re trying to put him out of business‚ throw him in prison‚ take him off the ballots. I mean‚ it’s so blatantly obvious just on a surface.” Want more from Glenn Beck?To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling‚ thought-provoking analysis‚ and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos‚ subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America‚ defend the Constitution‚ and live the American dream.

Speaker Mike Johnson is refusing to let President Joe Biden exploit the border crisis to score political points. For years‚ the Biden administration claimed the border is "secure" and denied there is a crisis. Then‚ when lawmakers wrote a bill that would have given Ukraine more than $60 billion and just $20 billion to the border crisis‚ Biden blamed the crisis on Republicans and claimed his hands were tied. "I've done all I can do‚" Biden claimed as Republicans screamed from the rafters that Biden is refusing to use existing statutory authority to alleviate the migrant crisis. But this week new reports said that Biden is now considering using executive authority to stymie the crisis‚ undermining his previous claims that there is nothing he can do. Under consideration is using a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act to deport migrants‚ which is an existing law‚ and policies that make it more difficult for migrants to pass asylum screenings and that allow the government to deport quickly those migrants who fail an enhanced screening process. In a statement‚ Johnson highlighted how Biden is using a potential short-term solution to score political points. After noting that Biden has previously ignored all demands to use his executive authority to alleviate the border crisis‚ Johnson said: Now‚ in an election year‚ after the president has surrendered the border to cartels and smugglers‚ after tens of thousands of Americans have tragically lost their lives due to fentanyl poisoning‚ after countless unaccompanied minors and young people have been subjected to human trafficking‚ and after millions of illegal aliens have been scattered by the Biden administration throughout our country — the President suddenly seems interested in trying to make a change using the legal authority that he claimed until recently didn't exist. Americans have lost faith in this President and won't be fooled by election year gimmicks that don't actually secure the border. Nor will they forget that the President created this catastrophe and‚ until now‚ has refused to use his executive power to fix it. Biden's plans‚ according to Johnson‚ reveal "just how brazenly and intentionally President Biden misled the public when he claimed he had done everything in his power to secure the border.""Specifically‚ the President's alleged desire to invoke Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act‚ which the White House dismissed using for months‚ is particularly telling‚" Johnson added.That Biden is now exploring a solution to score political points is not just a Republican talking point.Axios reported this week that Biden is considering issuing an executive order about two weeks before delivering his State of the Union address. That way‚ Biden will be able to tell Americans that "he took action while Republicans just talk‚" according to Axios.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Last year I had William Forstchen on “The Glenn Beck Program.” He’s the author of “One Second After‚” a novel that explores what would happen if an electromagnetic pulse hit the United States. It was February 2023 when I interviewed Forstchen‚ and the World Economic Forum had just issued a warning about imminent cyberattacks. It was a timely conversation. Fast-forward to this week. On Thursday‚ thousands of people were without cellphone service following a national outage of AT&;T. On Friday‚ AT&;T released a statement assuring everyone that the outage was not caused by a cyberattack. How long do you think your community would uphold civility and the rule of law when they become desperate for basic necessities? Now‚ I’m not saying it was a cyberattack. I’m not saying it wasn’t. But we should all consider whether we are prepared for one. According to our overlords in Davos‚ they are saying it’s a matter of when rather than if. Unless you’re a prepper like me‚ you probably haven’t considered what it would be like if we experienced a national cyberattack or an EMP. But William Forstchen has‚ and what he shared on my show was absolutely astounding. Consider for a moment if we went to war with Russia. Not like that would happen‚ right? Suppose Russia were to launch a cyberattack that left large portions of the United States without electricity. It’s not like Russia has ever launched cyberattacks against America before. What do you think would happen in the moments right after that attack? Let’s first take a step back and consider how vital electricity is for virtually everything we do. Forstchen compared our national infrastructure to a Jenga tower‚ and electricity is one of the blocks at the very bottom. “If that one block goes out‚” he said‚ “the entire tower collapses.” What would that look like? Your credit cards wouldn’t work. You couldn’t access your bank account. You wouldn’t be able to buy anything. You would have no heating unless you are prepared and have a backup generator. Chances are the phone lines would be down‚ so forget about calling 911. But that would be pointless anyway because your local hospital would also be without power. But that’s just the beginning. The bigger issue is the supply chain‚ which would cease almost immediately. Unless you have a backup supply of lifesaving medicine‚ food‚ water‚ and other basics‚ you are in a very dangerous situation. But you wouldn’t be the only one in trouble‚ and people do crazy things in desperate situations. How long do you think your community would uphold civility and the rule of law when they become desperate for basic necessities? What do you think people would do when no one could call the police and the police wouldn’t come anyway?Preppers have a reputation for being a crazy bunch of people who are preparing for impossibly outlandish situations. But does that situation seem outlandish? Is it crazy to think that we could go to war with Russia? We are already funding a war against Russia‚ and it’s a short step from there to an active war. Is it far-fetched to think that Russia‚ or any other capable world power‚ would launch a large-scale cyberattack on U.S. citizens? Russia has launched smaller cyberattacks on us before. Why wouldn’t it escalate if the opportunity presented itself? “Prepping” is making sure your house is in order. Our leaders are playing with fire‚ and there are few things in our current time that we can control. But we can control some things. You can buy extra jugs of water. You can stock up on non-perishable food. You can get a power source that’s not dependent on electricity. We may not be able to control everything‚ but we can make sure that our families are taken care of. That’s why I’m a prepper‚ and unless you trust your government to have your best interests in mind‚ you should consider being one too. Want more from Glenn Beck? Get Glenn's FREE email newsletter with his latest insights‚ top stories‚ show prep‚ and more delivered to your inbox.

The Wyoming Senate declared diversity‚ equity‚ and inclusion programs to be a source of division and have decided to pull funding for such programs at the University of Wyoming. During their budget proposals‚ state Senate members also made similar decisions surrounding gender studies programs.The University of Wyoming's Office of Diversity‚ Equity‚ and Inclusion will lose $1.7 million after a 20-11 vote in the state Senate passed during biennial budget discussions‚ the Wyoming Herald reported. An amendment declared no state funds should support any similar initiatives at the school.Republican State Senator Cheri Steinmetz proposed the budgetary change and emphasized that funding needed to be taken away from such programming. Republican State Senator Charles Scott also supported the amendment and said that the DEI programs lead to a focus on division rather than fostering equality. He noted his experience at Harvard University taught him that such programs‚ which he said pushed ideological homogeneity‚ could cause a "rot" in Wyoming.An 18-13 vote also reportedly passed an amendment that banned the university from putting any funding toward gender studies courses or programs. Steinmetz argued the programs were ideologically based‚ as opposed to educational. — (@) The university's DEI resources are numerous and varied in nature and include support for DACA recipients‚ for example. The school has mandated diversity-driven town halls and workshops‚ including a previously-promoted discussion on "Black Fatigue and being Committed Allies."The institution offers a "Black 14 social justice summer" program for high school students‚ which showcases a black raised-fist‚ typically associated with communist racial identarian groups.The "Black 14" refers to a group of black student-athletes from the 1969 University of Wyoming football team who were kicked off for allegedly "requesting to participate" in a protest for the Black Students' Alliance. The group allegedly broke a rule that stated scholarship players could not participate in demonstrations.The summer program's curriculum includes studies in civil rights and social justice and the "exploration of diversity‚ equity and inclusion principles." A portion of the course is also spent teaching "Cultural Understanding‚ Humility &; Intersectionality." We stand as a campus united against racism‚ bigotry and any other cultural or social intolerance. Read messages from incoming #UWyo President Edward Seidel &; Chief Diversity Officer Emily Monago: https://t.co/Ops75B9Ksb.\n\n#UWyoCoEd — (@) The school's chief diversity officer had a stated goal of "diversifying the faculty‚ staff‚ curriculum and programming" at the school to create an "inclusive campus environment." This included "diverse" recrutiment and retainment initiatives.The office also stated that it wished to solidify the school's commitment to expanding a diverse‚ inclusive‚ and equitable environment‚ which it claimed builds not only a better university‚ but a better "state‚ nation‚ and world."Both the House and Senate of Wyoming will finalize their budgets for March 4‚ 2024.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!