Is George Clooney gay? This question surfaced dramatically in an August 2023 online ad, which falsely claimed that the renowned actor had come out as gay. The misleading advertisement has left many fans puzzled and curious. However, this article will unravel the truth behind these rumors and shed light on the deceptive tactics used in the ad campaign. Amal / IG / In August 2023, an online advertisement that Clooney came “out of the closet,” suggesting that the 64-year-old actor has revealed he is gay. Last year in August, an ad began circulating online suggesting that George Clooney, at the age of 64, had come out of the closet. The ad was part of a campaign by Referene.com and included a supposed list of Hollywood stars who are part of the LGBTQI+ community. Surprisingly, Clooney’s name wasn’t even mentioned in the list. The ad merely used his name as bait to attract clicks. This strategy is known as clickbait. It is a common online marketing tactic where provocative headlines or sensational claims are used to lure readers into clicking on a link. Once the readers click, they often find that the content doesn’t match the headline. In this case, the ad falsely implied Clooney’s sexuality to drive traffic to the site. Is George Clooney Gay? Fact-checking the claim is essential. George Clooney is not gay. He has been happily married to Amal Clooney since 2014. The couple has two children and has consistently appeared together at public events, showcasing a strong and loving relationship. The online ad’s claim was a complete fabrication. Amal / IG / Fact check: Is George Clooney gay? NO! The ad is false! It is merely for clickbait! Clooney’s personal life has been quite transparent, and there has never been any credible evidence or statements from him suggesting otherwise. The ad aimed to exploit his popularity for monetary gain, leveraging the curiosity of fans and the general public. The Deceptive Ad Campaign The advertisement in question included a campaign name: “go_002_btq_7-31_x_us_george_clooney_zero_28091c.” This cryptic string reveals a lot about the ad’s purpose. The campaign name indicates a well-structured tracking mechanism used by the advertisers. They tracked various metrics to measure the success of the ad in receiving clicks. The strategy behind this ad is called arbitrage. In digital marketing, arbitrage involves buying traffic at a lower cost and monetizing it at a higher rate. Advertisers create sensational or misleading content to drive a high volume of traffic to their sites. Once users click on the ad, they are often bombarded with additional ads or led to purchase products, generating revenue for the advertisers. Amal / IG / George Clooney, 64, has been happily married to Amal Clooney since 2014. What is the Motivation Behind Clickbait? Clickbait ads like the one about George Clooney’s sexuality are designed to exploit human curiosity and drive traffic to specific websites. These sites earn money through various means, such as ad impressions, affiliate marketing, or selling products. The sensational nature of the ad headline increases the likelihood of clicks, which in turn increases the site’s revenue. The use of celebrities in these ads is particularly effective because of their wide recognition and public interest. George Clooney, being a beloved and well-known figure, became an easy target for this deceptive strategy. The goal was not to inform but to manipulate and profit from the traffic generated by the misleading headline. The post Is George Clooney Gay? appeared first on Fun Facts For Days.

THE WASHINGTON STAND—They say “hindsight is 20/20,” and really, only time will tell just how Thomas Matthew Crooks’ attempt to assassinate former President Donald Trump stirred (or hardened) the hearts of the American people. It would seem the immediate reactions to the shooting Saturday evening at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania are a mixed bag. In the most tragic of circumstances, some have heinously wished the bullet that grazed Trump’s right ear had taken his life. On the other hand, and arguably in the majority, are those who are indescribably grateful Trump walked away alive and well. These same people deeply sympathize with the family and friends of the man who “took Trump’s bullet,” firefighter Corey Comperatore. But as USA Today’s Dace Potas wrote, “Generation Z, spanning from 1997 to 2012, is entering politics at a tumultuous time—and no other single event highlights that more than the assassination attempt on Trump.” What happened Saturday was more than just a shocking and spontaneous event. Rather, it was a changing of the tides, a shift in the sand. By God’s grace, Trump survived this attempted murder, but these actions have consequences. These ill-willed motives have ripple effects that, while noticeable now, may not take full effect right away. As many probe the effects this may have on the presidential election, and as political and religious leaders declare their sentiments, the question remains: What is Gen Z’s reaction to such a monumental moment in history? “This may sound awful,” a friend said to me during dinner the other night, “but I’m glad I was alive to experience this event.” But really, he has a fair point. The last time a U.S. president’s life was threatened in this way was well before the lifetime of Gen Z. Even 9/11 was an event the majority of Gen Z was not alive for, or too young to thoroughly remember. There are countless other historical events that have dramatically changed American society, and yet, Gen Z missed them all. But on Saturday, many saw the circumstances unfold through their screens, and they continue to watch as a tsunami of opinions flood headlines, social media, and everyday discussion. Gen Z not only witnessed the near-death of a former president, but they seem determined to be involved in the debate of what it means for America. My friend at dinner was merely emphasizing what’s on many minds concerning the individuals who make up this young generation: “I saw history happen.” And from what I’m seeing, there’s a question that seems to commonly follow: What does this mean for the future? Well, as one user on X shared: “Millions of children around the world just witnessed an example of raw masculinity and heroism. The first political memory of an entire generation.” Indeed, this is the “first political memory” for countless Americans. “I’m 26 years old,” one user said in a post on X. “It’s the first time in my entire life that I’ve seen heroic action taken by a public figure that’s reminiscent of what I’ve read in history books about figures like Caesar or Napoleon.” Another user, regarding his son, wrote: “[I] was watching live with my little boy. He was inches away from watching the most disturbing thing he’s ever seen, but by the grace of [G]od, he instead watched a man being made into a real-life hero. Incredible.” Similarly, someone else posted: “My seven-[year-old] was even asking about it. Truly is the first political memory for a generation.” But beyond the social media posts, The Washington Stand dug deeper and received personal testimonies to what Gen Z is experiencing right now. In one comment, Melia Ross, an intern for Family Research Council’s Brand Advancement department, said, “Gen Z is responding to the event of the assassination attempt on Saturday with great respect for former President Trump.” Ross explained how she has seen “multiple reposts” from her friends’ social media accounts of the iconic image of “Donald Trump holding his fist in the air, while blood [was] dripping down his face” from the wound that almost took his life. A lot of Gen Z, she added, “are proud that Trump” was quick to bounce back and encourage the crowd toward patriotism. However, Ross noted that Gen Z seems to be handling Saturday evening’s event in many other ways as well. For instance, some have referenced other political issues such as the conversation about gun laws. Others, she highlighted, have responded with “humor” and memes that either praise Trump’s bravery or mock President Joe Biden. Ross said it seems these circumstances may be drawing in significant support for Trump among the younger crowds as Gen Z doesn’t look to Biden as someone worthy of their respect and honor. “Gen Z wants someone who is courageous and who is willing to take a bullet for their country,” Ross urged. Riley Lang, a former FRC intern, also shared her reaction. “As a recent college grad at a very large and liberal university, I am a first-hand witness of students like Thomas Matthew Crooks,” Lang said. She noted that while it’s true the media “has not put out information about the shooter’s motivation,” it seems probable this attack was “the result of a systemic problem.” “In my university classes,” Lang said, “Trump is called a racist, misogynistic, and evil person almost daily. And as a young person in this environment, if you support Trump in any capacity, you identify as all these characteristics as well.” Notably, she said, “The shooter was only 20 years old, and for the past seven years has heard Trump being compared to the likes of Hitler.” For Lang, this is likely “the result of a child spending his teen years in [a] divisive political environment, with Marxist professors and teachers and the media painting Trump as a villain. He is the result of being made into an activist.” What Lang went on to say is that the gunman, who was shot killed by the Secret Service, was only “one year younger” than she is. He was a member of Gen Z who was angry and took his anger out in this despicable and irreversible way, she said. “I see his anger towards Trump all around those my age,” Lang lamented. “America really needs to ask the question of what we are doing to our youth with education through the media, and the lack of faith.” Adam Opp, an intern in FRC’s Policy and Government Affairs department, stated in a comment to The Washington Stand that regardless of how people process the attack, “The shooting this past weekend was a flagrant violation of the constitutional system and processes guiding our electoral system for years.” Opp added: “The past decade has seen media censorship and biased reporting increase tremendously, but now an attempt to silence political opposition holds an ominous warning to future elections. As the political landscape becomes more divisive, Americans need to truly consider their political ideology and why they hold their political beliefs.” He said the most important step moving forward is “a reintroduction of biblical Christian principles into American society,” especially to “push back on the tension of our culture and promote a lasting unity for American culture.” Perhaps the polls and the surveys soon will give us a more in-depth understanding of how Gen Z is responding to this calamity. But within minutes of Trump shaking his fist in the air and chanting, “Fight!”—well, it became obvious many Americans are prepared to do just that. Americans, including the young people of Gen Z, want a true leader. No candidate will be perfect, but it’s time to get a true captain to the White House. Despite the fact of some negative reactions to Trump’s survival, I’d have to agree with swimmer-activist Riley Gaines, who said, “The surge of patriotism is stronger than ever.” And the younger generation appears to be no exception to that. As Opp concluded: “Living in 2024 is inspiring and encouraging, as it is a reminder of the need to stand up for biblical Christian truth and principles in a politically divisive environment.” “As a young adult,” he said, what happened Saturday evening in Pennsylvania “is a call to action and necessitates the courage to stand up for what is right to protect our nation and safeguard our government and God-given civil liberties.” Originally published by The Washington Stand The post How Gen Z Responds to Attempt to Kill Trump appeared first on The Daily Signal.