YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
NEWSFLASH: Kids DON'T Need Drag Shows to Learn Tolerance
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
Kamala Harris Covered Up Joe's Obvious Mental Decline
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
She's crazy, but she's probably right
Like
Comment
Share
INFOWARS
INFOWARS
1 y

Trump Responds to Biden Dropping Out: ‘Was Not Fit to Run for President, And Certainly Not Fit to Serve’ https://www.infowars.com/posts..../trump-responds-to-b

Attention Required! | Cloudflare
Favicon 
www.infowars.com

Attention Required! | Cloudflare

Site has no Description
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
1 y

Did President Just Confirm There Was MUCH MORE Press Coverage In Butler, PA Than Normal?
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Did President Just Confirm There Was MUCH MORE Press Coverage In Butler, PA Than Normal?

Earlier this week I brought you a 3-part series that SEEMS to suggest SOMEONE knew SOMETHING ahead of time about what was planned to happen in Butler, PA. I’m not naming anyone specific, I’m just saying there is a lot of evidence that is raising a lot of eyebrows about “knowledge aforethought”. In case you missed it, here are those three articles: BREAKING: Investment Fund Reportedly Placed MASSIVE PUT OPTION Against Trump Company Right Before Shooting? (Part 1) BOMBSHELL: Why Was The NYT Photographer Using Camera Settings Designed To Capture “Extremely Fast Moving Objects” At Deadly Trump Rally? (Part 2) FACT-CHECK: Did CNN Only Livestream One Trump Rally All Year Long….And It Just So Happened To Be Butler, PA? (Part 3) Now I have an update to the story. I'm not entirely sure, you can tell me what you think, but I'm pretty sure I heard President Trump say during his Michigan Rally that there was MUCH MORE Press in Butler, PA than normally turns out for one of his Rallies. Did you catch it? Here, I've clipped the exact part. Listen and tell me what you think: Did President Trump just confirm there was way more Media in Butler, PA than one of his typical rallies? LISTEN FOR YOURSELF: "And they had cameras blazing! I guess it was different in that way too....because we were right in the middle of all the news, and they were blazing!… pic.twitter.com/qS8CtCUgkQ — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) July 21, 2024 Did President Trump just confirm there was way more Media in Butler, PA than one of his typical rallies? LISTEN FOR YOURSELF: "And they had cameras blazing! I guess it was different in that way too....because we were right in the middle of all the news, and they were blazing! They were going!" Hmmmm...... What do you think? In case you missed it, I'll repost all 3 articles below: FACT-CHECK: Did CNN Only Livestream One Trump Rally All Year Long....And It Just So Happened To Be Butler, PA? (Part 3) Ok folks, time to do a Fact-Check together on this one... Because if this is true, this is very damning. The allegation is making the rounds that CNN has only chosen to livestream one Trump Rally all year long, and which one did they chose to suddenly cover? Butler, PA. What are the odds, right? Did you know that CNN has only live streamed one Trump rally this year? Just so happens it was on July 13th. Are you paying attention yet? — ✪ Evil Te?an ✪ (@vileTexan) July 18, 2024 CNN HAVE NOT LIVE STREAMED ANY TRUMP RALLIES ON CNN IN YEARS!AND GUESS WHAT, THE FIRST TIME THEY DO LIVE STREAM ONE, BOOM!THERE'S AN ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT ON TRUMP? WHAT DID THEY KNOW?????????? What did SCHUMER KNOW AS WELL???????? — twk4usa (@Tweeklives) July 13, 2024 That would be mind-blowing if true....and seemingly evidence that "someone knew something". But now the million-dollar question: Is it actually true? Grok says yes: ChatGPT says no: But is ChatGPT right? It claims CNN did not livestream the Trump Rally in Butler, PA, but I have found evidence quite to the contrary. Check out this Tweet from a man named Pete Seat who is an analyst for CNN, where he's inviting everyone to watch the Trump Rally in PA on CNN so they can see him do post-speech analysis after it's over.  And check the time stamp, he posted it about 2 hours before the Rally began: Plan to watch Trump’s Pennsylvania rally at 5pm ET? Could I ask you to do so on @cnn? In addition to a crystal clear HD feed, you’ll get post-speech analysis from me & @ChuckRocha. That’s 10% more hilarity & 25% more insight… but only if you act now! pic.twitter.com/0EfhAmDpLJ — Pete Seat (@PeteSeat) July 13, 2024 Screenshot in case that Tweet gets deleted: According to his Twitter bio, his story checks out.  He is indeed a Commentator with clear political ties: So this Tweet from Mr. Seat (hey that rhymes!) seems to confirm CNN did indeed livestream the Butler, PA Rally. FACT-CHECK CONFIRMED! The only other piece to this that I have not been able to track down in the affirmative or negative is whether this was the ONLY Trump Rally CNN has covered this year. Anyone out there able to help me verify that piece of info? If that piece can be verified, then it seems we have our THIRD set of very damning info that there seemed to be clear knowledge aforethought that something BIG was going to happen at this Rally.  Perhaps they didn't know what, but they knew to cover it.  That's where I see the evidence pointing. Here's a summary of all strange things: Questions I would like answered sooner than later - Why was there a massive stock short in Truth Social right before the assassination attempt?-Why was MSM covering his rally with ultra high shutter speed cameras? And is it normal for them to have the high quality cameras… pic.twitter.com/zhBWf8Tu8w — Native Patriot (@LaNativePatriot) July 18, 2024 Questions I would like answered sooner than later - Why was there a massive stock short in Truth Social right before the assassination attempt? -Why was MSM covering his rally with ultra high shutter speed cameras? And is it normal for them to have the high quality cameras during rallies? If it’s not normal, who gave the order to make sure to capture every second at 1/8000 speed being reported? - Why did the parents call in on their own son who was 20 and supposedly visited the range regularly? -Why did they have a description of him 3 hours before and nothing was done - Why did Jill Biden’s good friend, pull the A list security from Trump right before the rally with a “credible threat” of an assassination from Iran? - How was this kid completely online scrubbed before this? Zero online activity? Really? - Why did the Secret Service have the main vantage point for a sniper completely open for over an hour, minimum? -Why did security spot him at 5:51pm, and confirmed at 5:53pm and allow Trump on stage at 6:00pm, just to be shot at 6:11pm? -Why were so many Trump supporters at the rally aware of his presence? - How was the kid able to scope out the area an hour before, and return with a ladder and a rifle, completely undeterred? - Why were there bystanders and Trump supporters able to snap photos of the shooter before Secret Service could take him down? - Why were they able to take him down virtually instantly AFTER he got 8 shots off? What exactly was the hesitation before he shot? - Why has there only been praise from the Biden regime for how good Secret Service did when they allowed the former President to get shot? - Why isn’t every single person in charge of that security detail in a holding cell while every bit of their life gets investigated? -Why are we automatically assuming this WASN’T an inside job? - Why isn’t every America First congressman and senator demanding investigations and actively pursuing them for EVERYONE involved. EVERYONE. I believe we witnessed a miracle on July 13th. Divine intervention caused Trump to turn his head 15-20 degrees at the exact moment needed to save his life. Miracles don’t happen everyday, and shouldn’t be expected. The burden now falls on us to prevent this from happening again. We get one do over. This is it. Last chance. If we don’t get to the bottom of this IMMEDIATELY, they WILL go after Trump again, and if we do nothing….. well I wouldn’t rely on another miracle to save him. It’s up to us. Demand answers, from YOUR representatives. Call them. Tweet at them. Reach out to large influencers, get their attention, have them push these questions, and also demand answers. Do NOT let this fade away like the Epstein death…. This is an all hands on deck situation. Your country needs you. Last chance That's a great summary, well done Native Patriot! And if you missed Parts 1 and 2 of our coverage in this series, I'll post them below: BOMBSHELL: Why Was The NYT Photographer Using Camera Settings Designed To Capture "Extremely Fast Moving Objects" At Deadly Trump Rally? (Part 2) Ok folks, this is Part 2 in what is going to be a 3-part series exposing things that seem to suggest there was "knowledge aforethought" that Donald Trump was going to be assassinated that fateful afternoon in Butler, PA. I want to be very clear I'm not accusing any particular person of anything, I'm simply reporting on some facts that are raising a lot of eyebrows. There may be perfectly valid explanations for all of these, and that's why I only report -- and I let YOU decide! Ok, with that clarification out of the way, let's dig in.... So I have to say upfront I have no expertise in photography.  None.  I took a "photography" summer class in 6th grade and I hated it so much the memory still stays with me.  I just don't get it.  I'm not built for it.  I found it very frustrating. But that doesn't mean I can't respect the people who DO get it and are very good at it. And those people have noticed something VERY interesting about the now famous photo of President Trump that APPEARS to have captured the bullet after it hit his ear and kept going past time. Truly and ICONIC and almost IMPOSSIBLE photo. Like the Big Unit Randy Johnson exploding that bird with his pitch back in 2001.....anyone remember this? What are the odds? Well, that's the question many people are asking about this now iconic photo: What are the odds? Specifically though, to capture a photo like that many photography experts are reporting that the photographer is quoted as saying he was shooting at 30fps 1/8000. According to Nick Sorter: #BREAKING: Combat correspondent and photographer Michael Yon comments on NYT reporter Doug Mills decision to use a HIGHLY advanced camera the day Trump was SHOT! Yon said “The New York Times photographer, Doug Mills, is quoted as shooting at 30fps 1/8000. Those are settings I would choose if I were trying to catch extremely fast action. Such as a head exploding.” Could the NYT Reporter have KNOWN something was going to happen?! https://x.com/nicksortor/status/1813781917717651696?s=46&t=fQPc05aE4Kkb738_xetJBg This post from MJTruth was really good, let me show you this one too and then we'll break it all down: Everyone should read this… The NYT Reporter who Captured the Bullet Flying Past Trumps Head, was using the Kind of Camera & Settings you’d Use to Capture Live-Fire Action, Such as a Head Exploding!@Michael_Yon , one of the most experienced combat war correspondents living… https://t.co/hZuNAR9SCD pic.twitter.com/aGX5bvTSwU — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) July 18, 2024 Everyone should read this… The NYT Reporter who Captured the Bullet Flying Past Trumps Head, was using the Kind of Camera & Settings you’d Use to Capture Live-Fire Action, Such as a Head Exploding! @Michael_Yon, one of the most experienced combat war correspondents living today, made a Compelling assessment. I put together his assessment in a more understandable breakdown, provided additional details, and my analysis. Quoted from the NYT • Who was the Photographer? —— A famous veteran NYT photographer named Doug Mills. • What Kind of Equipment & Settings were used? —— Mr. Mills was using a Sony A1 and 24mm f/1.4 GM, capable of capturing images at up to 30 frames per second. Priced at $6,499. —— He took these photos with a shutter speed of 1/8,000th of a second. Extremely Fast by industry standards. The above is quoted from NYT themselves. Source: (https://nytimes.com/2024/07/14/us/politics/photo-path-trump-assassination.html) The Perfect “Shot” • If the gunman was firing an AR-15-style rifle, the .223-caliber or 5.56-millimeter bullets they use travel at roughly 3,200 feet per second when they leave the weapon’s muzzle. —— “And with a 1/8,000th of a second shutter speed, this would allow the bullet to travel approximately four-tenths of a foot while the shutter is open.” • Most cameras used to capture images of bullets in flight are using extremely high speed specialty cameras not normally utilized for regular photography, so catching a bullet on a side trajectory as seen in that photo would be a one in a million shot and nearly impossible to catch even if one knew the bullet was coming. At that distance and trajectory, had any bullet hit Trump, that type of camera and settings would have easily captured his head frankly exploding. Were they there for the “Perfect Pulitzer Prize Head Shot”…? COUNTER ARGUMENTS • “Some journalists argue Its usage by the NYT photographers is not unusual.” —— Only professional photographers can answer this question. • “Shooting at 1/8000 at f1.6 in daylight is also not unusual, but necessary for proper exposure.” —— again, only Professional and unbiased photographers can answer that question. CRITICAL QUESTIONS THAT WILL EITHER PROVE OR DEBUNK THIS • Examine any and all Video footage of the Photographer, Doug Mills, at least 1-2 minutes before the shot. —— check body language. —— how many images did he capture leading up to THAT moment? —— was he ultra focused in the moments leading up to the shots? • How many times has Doug Mills photographed at a Trump rally? —— apply that same question to other cameramen & photographers. • Who made the decision to send Doug Mills there? —— climb the ladder. • How common is it for these kinds of cameras and these settings used to capture rally speeches, where the “object” being photographed is standing still? —— Trump campaign photographers can weigh in easily on this, or maybe even Gene Ho. • Why were all legacy media outlets showing THIS rally Live? —— they rarely do that… —— CNN, MSNBC, FOX, and others decided to show THIS rally? —— Find out who gave those outlets the green light to show this rally live. Climb the ladder. These questions can lead the Trump campaign to answers. That's a really good and fair post, examining all angles. I told you, there could be a PERFECTLY good and reasonable explanation here. But it IS still raising a lot of eyebrows.... Here is the Michael Yon post that has been referenced by many.  Yon claims Bullet Trace, and interesting matters It’s nearly 0400 here in Japan. So this is a mind-dump, sans edit: Interesting on bullet trace — scratching my memories, I do not recall seeing any bullet trace photos from close to 90 degrees from bullet’s flight path. Am not saying it… — Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY 6 (@Michael_Yon) July 16, 2024 Bullet Trace, and interesting matters It’s nearly 0400 here in Japan. So this is a mind-dump, sans edit: Interesting on bullet trace — scratching my memories, I do not recall seeing any bullet trace photos from close to 90 degrees from bullet’s flight path. Am not saying it cannot be done. It probably can be done with modern cameras and high shutter speeds. Now keep in mind I am pretty handy with weapons and with cameras. I was a Special Forces weapons specialist. As a photographer, I shot some of the most famous photos in Iraq and in Afghanistan. Substantial crossover knowledge. My first thought was — I’d never seen a trace shot from that angle. Second thought was it should be possible. Third thought was that would be a fast shutter speed. I was preparing to reach out to the photographer. Hunting and pecking online, I found New York Times quoting the shutter speed at 1/8000th of second. It happens that I have sitting on table here the top three DSLRs Sony makes. The cameras most people salivate over, I have three here. Because I know how important serious gear is. I use only the very best cameras and lenses. Top gear helped make some of the most interesting and often intense photos in two wars. Unfortunately I often broke lenses while jumping on the ground or hitting against a wall or doorway. No camera ever broke. I use the cameras regularly though rarely publish photos from them these days. The maximum shutter speed on all three of these cameras in 1/8000. The the New York Times photographer, Doug Mills, is quoted as shooting at 30fps 1/8000. Those are settings I would choose if I were trying to catch extremely fast action. Such as a head exploding. Am not suggesting anything at all. Just as a war correspondent…I never cranked shutter that high even for anything. I wanted to keep ISO lower. Other professionals choose other settings. Yon claims that as a war correspondent, he personally never cranked shutter that high for anything. That's quite a statement. Ok, now let's look at the Community Note attached to the Tweet: Another similar one here: Ok, so this note is claiming that shooting at 1,8000 is also a setting you would use if you were shooting on a bright sunny day and wanted the subject in focus. That seems to be in contrast to what Michael Yon claims as his personal experience, but as I said above it's all Greek to me in the world of photography. So I would love to hear from any of you who are amateur (or professional) photogs. Do you shoot in 1,800? If so, what are the situations that you'd use it for? I also put the question to ChatGPT, because it is an expert on everything, of course. Here was my first question: So when asked what these settings are for, ChatGPT seems to side with the Twitter posts above (and not the Community Note), identifying the ability to capture fast moving objects but not saying anything about being good for a sunny day. To be thorough, I then asked a follow up question, specifically drilling down on the utility of those settings for a bright sunny day: So putting that in my own layman's terms, it sounds like the answer is it might help with brightness, but that's not really the primary use of those settings and there are other settings that might be more effective dealing with a bright sunny day. Ok folks, now I want to hear from you. We have a lot of really smart people that read WLTReport every day, and with 5+ million monthly readers, I have no doubt we have a lot of very seasoned photogs in here. Please light up the comments section and let me hear your thoughts!  I'll check back in a bit to read them. Thank you! And if you missed Part 1 of this series, I'll reprint it below: BREAKING: Investment Fund Reportedly Placed MASSIVE PUT OPTION Against Trump Company Right Before Shooting? (Part 1) Ok folks, buckle up for this one because it's wild! We're talking finance, but I promise you it will NOT be boring. First, a little education session... When you think a stock is going to go down, you can "short it" to make money on the way down. Most people know that. If you want to make even more money by using more leverage, you can buy "puts" and you'll make a lot more money if you're right about it going down. One other thing....stock ticker symbol $DJT is the stock that owns TruthSocial (Trump's company). Now, let's say you were the Deep State and you planned to assassinate a President.  Let's also say that President owned a large social media company whose success was largely tied to his success.  So much so that ticker symbol was $DJT.  Then let's assume you wanted to assassinate that President and make several hundred million dollars while doing it. What would you do? You'd by a crap-ton of puts on $DJT. So did anyone do that? Let me introduce you to Austin Private Wealth LLC. According to public filings, they reported that they shorted 12,000,000 shares of $DJT via puts!! That would qualify as a "crap-ton". Take a look: A company named Austin Private Wealth LLC shorted 12,000,000 shares of $DJT through a put option. The filing date was July 12th, the day before the assassination attempt on Donald Trump. They manage approximately $1 billion in assets, and this is by far their largest put… pic.twitter.com/GzPD9vxzMm — Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) July 17, 2024 A company named Austin Private Wealth LLC shorted 12,000,000 shares of $DJT through a put option. The filing date was July 12th, the day before the assassination attempt on Donald Trump. They manage approximately $1 billion in assets, and this is by far their largest put option. The next closest was Citadel Advisors with 16,770 shares. Austin Private Wealth LLC, a financial services company, is connected to the Bush family through James A. Baker III, a former Secretary of State and close Bush family associate. James A. Baker III serves as a Senior Policy Director at Austin Private Wealth LLC. He has been with the company since its inception in 2006, advising on foreign policy and international relations. George H.W. Bush: He was a client of Austin Private Wealth LLC and received investment advice from the firm. George W. Bush: He has spoken at Austin Private Wealth LLC's events and has been involved in the company's charitable initiatives. Here's a snapshot of the filing: My friend Mike Adams the Health Ranger was also on the story: Here's the relevant data from https://t.co/QozIHQ8TXQ, showing the astonishingly huge short position ("put") filed on July 12th by Austin Private Wealth, LLC against Trump Media & Technology Group, Corp, for an astonishing 12,000,000 shares. This would have generated a windfall… pic.twitter.com/3pSDXl43vv — HealthRanger (@HealthRanger) July 17, 2024 Kyle Becker reports there are strong BlackRock and Vanguard ties with Austin Private Wealth LLC -- although to be fair, almost everything in the financial industry is in one way or another closely tied to Vanguard and BlackRock (which is most of the problem): Vanguard (Soros) and BlackRock are among the largest holders in Austin Private Wealth LLC pic.twitter.com/LzVU9ihqGv — Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) July 18, 2024 Now since we're talking finance, we might as well go to one of the top finance guys out there, my friend Meet Kevin who actually covered this topic early this morning on his Stock Market Open livestream. Starting at the 22:11 mark, someone asks him about it and he looks into it live on the stream.... I don't want to put words in his mouth, which is why I'm giving you the video below so you can watch for yourself (it should start right at 22:11) but he basically concludes by the end: "yeah, that does seem really weird". Watch here: In the interest of fair and accurate reporting, now we have to go to the company itself who released a statement correcting the record and basically claiming this was just an "error" in their filing. You can see the statement below: Statement on incorrect filing from Austin Private Wealth, LLC “The SEC filing which showed that Austin Private Wealth shorted a large number of shares of Trump Media & Technology Group Corp (DJT) was incorrect and we immediately amended it as soon as we learned of the error. No… pic.twitter.com/306kdFRutF — Wolf of My Street (@Ryan__Rigg) July 18, 2024 FULL IMAGE: They basically say it was error in the number. So they DID actually purchase puts on $DJT, just not 12 million shares worth.  They claim it was only 1,200 shares.  Basically, some how the error multiplied the number by 10,000 times.  Very strange. Other sources are reporting that not only did they short $DJT, they also shorted Rumble ($RUM) -- a closely related company and one that would likely move similarly to $DJT. Oh my: Not only did Austin Private Wealth short 12 million shares of Trump's $DJT stock before his attempted assassination, but they also shorted 34 million shares of Rumble at exactly the same time. In addition to a connection to the Bush family through James A. Baker, the largest… pic.twitter.com/R7QQvF7OZ0 — Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) July 18, 2024 So....was it just an error?  Just a glitch?  Just a typo?  Just a multiplier oopsie-doopsie? One hell of a time and place to have a "glitch" is all I can say. Not saying it wasn't, just saying that is one hell of a really bad glitch. What the fuck https://t.co/omb9AU1VKl — Tim Pool (@Timcast) July 18, 2024 Others report the Investment Firm has strong ties to the Bush family: ????????: Austin Private Wealth with CONNECTIONS to the Bush family shorted 12M shares of $DJT via a put option on July 12, just ONE DAY before the assassination attempt. Did the Bush's know something was going to happen to Donald Trump? This massive trade represents… https://t.co/BWJ1fAqn8O pic.twitter.com/kxnupNxSwW — legislation (@legislationpage) July 18, 2024 ????????: Austin Private Wealth with CONNECTIONS to the Bush family shorted 12M shares of $DJT via a put option on July 12, just ONE DAY before the assassination attempt. Did the Bush's know something was going to happen to Donald Trump? This massive trade represents 6% of total shares and over 16% of the float, given Trump’s 60% ownership. Their $1B AUM makes this a significant bet. Austin Private Wealth is connected to the Bush family through James A. Baker III, a Senior Policy Director with longstanding ties to the Bushes, having served as Secretary of State under George H.W. Bush and in various roles under Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. George W. Bush has strongly shared his support AGAINST Trump despite everything happening in our country. While these connections don’t imply direct involvement, they highlight significant professional relationships.. Conclusion? I think we have to take them at their word that it was just a "multiplier glitch".  Very strange.  Incredibly bad timing for that particular glitch to have happened. Also, the entire story wasn't wrong, they did short $DJT, just not that much. Your thoughts?
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
1 y

A NASTY Brokered Convention For The Democrats Is All But Assured After Today (Only Happened 9 Times In History!)
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

A NASTY Brokered Convention For The Democrats Is All But Assured After Today (Only Happened 9 Times In History!)

Last week we told you a Brokered Convention was likely in the cards for the Democrats…. After the breaking news of today, it appears all but assured. Not only is it coming, but I believe it’s going to be extremely ugly. Great for us, ugly for them. And it’s going to be SO fun to watch! Let’s start with a prophetic word that a friend sent me, which feels spot on in my spirit: “Their plans will bring backlash and resistance, and they will turn on their own party leaders. Watch as they become violent against each other because of their plot—how they try to pull this off will enrage their own party even more. The DNC convention will be unprecedented for them, and not in a good way. There will be interruptions and people marching in the streets. Protesters will show that great resistance has grown. The party lines have been drawn, and where they once agreed, now there is a great divide. My children, you are seeing that a great weakness has grown because they are no longer in agreement. Your enemies are destroying themselves, and any credibility they thought they had has now disappeared. I told you that the old guard is coming down and so is everyone with them, saith the Lord.” I will update this to give credit to the person who gave this word when I get the name. But now let’s talk about how it might actually work. My friend Kevin put together another excellent video.  It’s only about 10 minutes and I think he does an excellent job breaking it all down so I’ll just let you watch right here (also, full transcript below in case that’s easier for you to read). Watch here: FULL TRANSCRIPT: MeetKevin: Okay, a lot of updates in this video, but as I exported the video, another update just came out. Obama just dropped his update. He stopped short of endorsing Kamala, praised Joe, but it’s going to make a lot of sense as you watch this entire video. Obama said he has confidence that the Democratic Party is going to come up with a fair process for choosing the next nominee. This is really important information. It’ll make a lot of sense in what you’re about to hear. Nobody else is talking about this yet, so make sure to subscribe here. Let’s get into it. Few more things quickly, so much news happening. RFK said, “If they had done this from the beginning, I wouldn’t have left the Democratic Party. Democrats need to find who is best to beat Trump.” Now, this is really interesting because RFK is holding a press conference later in the day, and some people are speculating that RFK might flip back to Dem because he realizes he can’t make it as an independent and try to compete in this open primary that’s coming. We’ll talk about that in a moment. That’s the mini-competition regarding what he is alluding to. But to reiterate this, you’ll learn more in the video; it makes sense in the video. But to reiterate this, even more news: Harris just posted that she “intends to earn and win this nomination.” “Earn” implies fighting in a mini-primary, and Pete Buttigieg just last night joined Kamala at a campaign event where they raised $2 million. And so some people are now speculating, “Oh, Black woman and gay— that’ll be the next ticket.” And you had Alex Soros endorse Kamala Harris, which Elon, after that, said, “Thanks for not keeping people in suspense in terms of who the next puppet would be.” Okay, now let’s get into the video. Oh, and for the people wondering if we’re actually flying, here you go. We are presently flying about 500 mph. Oh, 498, 499. Here we go. By now, we already know that Joe Biden has quit. We announced it while I was on my run and it happened, but we’ve got a lot more to talk about. First, we’ve got to understand what’s happening next. Who is the new nominee going to be? Yes, Joe Biden did end up endorsing Kamala, even though he didn’t at first. It took 20 minutes for him to, but we got to talk about what’s next. We got to talk about what the Obamas and Pelosi and Clintons are up to. Then we got to talk about Whitmer and Newsom and what the market implications of this are going to be this week. I’ve got some serious concerns about it all, so let’s get started. First, with something very serious, we’re about 6,000 subscribers away from 2 million, so if you haven’t yet, hit that subscribe button. And it’s National Ice Cream Day, so what a great day to go to Vegas when it’s 110 degrees. Anyway, so let’s focus. Eleven days ago, Nancy Pelosi on July 10th and a delegation of about 40 California Democrats—yes, I know California Democrats—but anyway, they discussed the downsides of automatically crowning Kamala Harris. They thought it would actually turn off voters. Not that Democratic voters would turn around and vote for Trump, but Democrats don’t like this idea of what the Democratic Party has been doing forever, which is, “We’re just going to tell you how to play the game, and then you all go and vote for it.” That’s what they did during the California recall; that’s what they do almost every single election. “You’re going to vote for no on recall. You’re going to vote for Newsom. You’re going to leave the rest of the ballot blank because we don’t want you to have a backup candidate.” It’s literally what they did in 2021 in California, and people listen. But eventually, people get frustrated and think the party may not be the best group of people to decide what America needs. Instead, it should be left to an open process. So it was apparently Obama—this is per Politico—it was apparently the Obama camp that decided we hold a blitz primary. This is from the Obama team, that hey, Democrats should hold a blitz primary and find out the best person to lead the Democratic ticket and the Democratic vice presidential ticket. Because now, obviously, you know, if Kamala runs, she’s going to have to pick a VP. If it’s Newsom or Whitmer, they’re going to have to pick a VP. So all of these things have to get cleared up. Now remember, Nancy Pelosi was also one of the first to say, “Hey, was Biden’s behavior episodic, or evidence of a larger condition?” She was the first person to actually—I know a lot of people don’t like Pelosi, but let’s be real here—she was the first person to be reasonable, be like, “I don’t know. This could be a larger issue.” And over the last few weeks, apparently Pelosi and her allies have been very clear about expressing their distaste for Biden, potentially leading to the loss of the House, which they’ve already lost, but reiterating a loss in the House, losing the Senate, and losing the presidency. And then you have a red sweep. Not good from a Democratic point of view, of course. A lot of Republicans are very happy about this. That’s why Republicans are like, “We need to keep Joe Biden in because you’re going to cream him.” And frankly, that was true. If Joe Biden stayed and it was between a senile old man and Donald Trump, there would have been a landslide win for, well, frankly, Donald Trump. So now, what’s going on? Well, the idea now is that the Clintons and Obamas will host mini-primaries to find a new candidate. The Clintons just endorsed Kamala Harris, both Bill and Hillary. This suggests that Bill and Hillary are not going to be on a ticket again on their own. Instead, they’re endorsing Kamala. You do not yet have an endorsement from Obama, though we expect that to follow. We also know that Whitmer and Newsom have acknowledged that Biden dropped out. They call him a hero for dropping out, but they have not endorsed Kamala. This means you could end up getting a Whitmer versus Kamala versus Newsom in what’s called a blitz primary in August. Now some people say, “Hey, but wait a minute. You know, this is like Bill Ackman. If Kamala is not going to be the designated presidential nominee, then that means she wasn’t fit to be VP.” That’s not necessarily true, Bill Ackman. You could still hold a blitz primary if people like another candidate better. That’s okay. You don’t have to be the next person. Now one of the reasons I think that Kamala was not initially endorsed by Joe Biden is most of Joe Biden’s camp didn’t even realize this was happening. You had campaign staffers on “Face the Nation” this morning who were like, “No, Joe Biden’s looking forward to campaigning this week.” And then what ended up happening? Joe Biden sends a letter from his personal Twitter account saying, “I’m quitting.” The presidential seal wasn’t even on it. A lot of his campaign staffers are saying they found out through a post on X that Joe Biden was quitting before they heard from the Biden admin that he was quitting. So you can see this was held—these cards were held very, very closely to the chest here. It’s the Pelosis and the Obamas running the show here. Okay, and maybe to some extent the Clintons. They run the Democratic Party, let’s be real. Anyway, this happened on the fourth day that Biden was sequestering in Delaware because he has COVID, even though we see him get on and off planes to Delaware without masks on. Whatever. There was also, hours ago, a new poll that put Biden down 7% in Michigan, more than double the deficit he had from before the debate, which means the polls were really starting to roll over and reflect the pain. Now Joe Biden initially did not endorse Kamala, but he did 20 minutes later, so I think he got a lot of heat that he was overlooking a Black female, and so a lot of people freaked out, and so Biden was forced to basically say, “No, no, no, no, of course I endorse Kamala.” So that followed. And now you’re getting the typical bashing from both sides. The Democrats are saying, “Oh yeah, Biden’s a hero. Of course, we have to support Kamala.” And then you’re getting Republicans like Trump and Speaker Johnson and a bunch of other Republicans like JD Vance saying, “Well, if Biden’s not fit to campaign, then he’s not fit to be in charge of the nuclear codes. He’s not fit to be president.” Donald Trump posted as much on his Truth Social, and while I’m not going to read you the whole thing, it’s just worth noting that Donald Trump thinks that the only reason Joe Biden was actually elected is because of the fake news media and the lies and Joe Biden hanging out in his basement, and now the truth is coming out. Okay, fine. We understand this. Even Hakeem Jeffries is like, “Oh, Joe Biden’s a hero. We have to support him.” Again, Joe Biden supported him as well. The big question though is, what is now the case for the ticket? Well, there are two things here. One, the $240 million war chest the Bidens have. Number two, the market. So number one, you can simply take that $240 million and move it to Kamala if she’s the nominee because they’re the same ticket. That’s no problem. That’s easy mode. If Kamala doesn’t end up being the ticket nominee, that’s okay. You will form a super PAC and you can move the money from the Biden coffers to the super PAC. This is easy to do. Now I want to be clear, a lot of people have heard Elon is donating $45 million to President Trump and then Elon says this is fake news. But let’s be real, Elon Musk is just loophole here. Elon Musk knows how to play politics better than the politicians do. Elon isn’t donating to Trump because you can’t. You can’t donate to an individual more than like $33,700 a year. It’s very simple. Instead, you create a super PAC that you can control that then spends millions of dollars on TV ads or whatever, flyers, whatever promoting Donald Trump. This is why Elon Musk can in the same vein say, “No, that’s fake news.” But then on the other hand, you have Trump going, “Wow, I’m getting $45 million a month from Elon. This is great.” Elon plays politics better than the politicians. Don’t doubt that. But anyway, now the question is what happens with the market and next steps? Well, this is my take. And this is where a lot of people are going to say, “I don’t know, Kevin. I don’t know.” Look, massive uncertainty begins now from what happens in the Democratic ticket. This is very, very clear. When you have uncertainty before an election, you tend to see a market go down. I think the Qs could go down 15%. We’ll have a more detailed video in the future and still no updates here from Newsom and Whitmer even though they’re active on Twitter right now. Clearly, they’re not jazzed about endorsing Kamala, but I think you have a good chance of every risk asset selling down until the election and the market will skyrocket after the election, probably no matter who is elected. This is very, very common. This is the stuff we teach in Stocks and Psychology of Money. We’ve been talking about this in our course member live streams every single morning that the market has been open because we’re looking, going, “Listen, yes, a lot of people are talking about a rotation to small caps, but look at these warning signs that actually say going short the Qs might be a better strategy.” We look at CTA positioning, we look at what’s happening with valuations. We do this every day in our course member live streams. Sometimes I don’t get around to making a big video on YouTube about this, but uncertainty will now max because the reality is, no matter who the candidate is, the odds of Trump losing are now greater with anybody but Biden. Here’s my point on that. I think your 67% chance of a Trump victory versus Biden, 33% chance of a Biden victory. Now Biden’s gone. Okay, so Biden’s zero. Now put in Kamala, honestly, you’re probably like 58% Trump, 42% Kamala. You put in somebody like Whitmer, Newsom, or even Kamala if she wins through a blitz primary, those odds could squeeze down to maybe 54 to 46, 48 to 52. You’d actually have a real competition, and markets are going to have to price in that uncertainty. Markets don’t like uncertainty. There’s only one way they go. I don’t want to fearmonger. I’m just trying to provide the news. You don’t have to agree with that opinion. Subscribe. I’ll give you more updates as they come out, but this is obviously a big game changer. Thank you so much. I got to get to Vegas now. We’ll see you soon. Thanks. Goodbye. Make sure to subscribe and go to meetkevin.com to learn more about the courses on building your wealth and meetkevin.com Mastermind to learn how you can one-on-one or small group mastermind with me in person on whatever you want to talk about. Let’s go. Here’s what we told you just last week: INCOMING: Here Comes A Brokered Convention….For The Democrats! Are you ready for history to be made? Again? It sure has been a WILD July, and it’s only half over. New reports out tonight have Joe Biden dropping out by Sunday, but in a shock move NOT endorsing his Vice President, Kamala Harris. It’s worth noting this could end up not happening, and stubborn Joe Biden (mostly Jill Biden) could dig their heels in again, but multiple sources right now are confirming the report. Take a look: BREAKING: Per @MarkHalperin, Biden will announce his withdrawal as soon as Sunday, followed by an OPEN Democrat convention between Kamala and three or more rivals. Biden will NOT endorse his VP and will NOT resign the presidency. This could be the wildest month in American… — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) July 18, 2024 That betrayal would be absolutely historic. It would also lead to a true Brokered Convention for the Democrats. Something that has RARELY happened in our history. In fact, history notes it has only happened 9 times total, and none since 1952: Democratic Party 1920: James M. Cox was nominated on the 44th ballot. 1924: John W. Davis was nominated on the 103rd ballot. 1932: Franklin D. Roosevelt was nominated on the 4th ballot. 1952: Adlai Stevenson was nominated on the 3rd ballot. Republican Party 1880: James A. Garfield was nominated on the 36th ballot. 1884: James G. Blaine was nominated on the 4th ballot. 1912: William Howard Taft was nominated on the 1st ballot after a contentious convention. 1940: Wendell Willkie was nominated on the 6th ballot. 1952: Dwight D. Eisenhower and Robert A. Taft competed in a contested convention, but Eisenhower was nominated on the 1st ballot. Watch this short 4 minute video for more inforation: Full transcript: Hey, this is breaking news. Apparently, Joe Biden has made the decision to withdraw. He has told campaign officials that he has decided to withdraw, and an official announcement will come as early as Sunday. But rather than announcing Kamala Harris as a replacement and rather than resigning from the office of president to automatically bestow that power to Kamala, making her the first female president, it looks like what the Democratic party is going to do is hold the first brokered Democratic National Convention since the 1950s. This would allow multiple different Democratic contenders to compete for the position. They can presumably debate, advertise, or argue to actually fight for the Democratic nomination in August. This means it’s entirely possible we could be going through a whole unscripted party put together here and fight over what the ticket could be or would be or what it might look like. We might not necessarily have a Kamala Harris ticket; instead, we could have someone else like Gavin Newsom and whomever he picks to be his running mate. We could have Pete Buttigieg and whomever he picks to be his running mate. I assume Kamala is going to put her hat in the ring, but they’re all going to be competing against each other. And honestly, to this, I have to say, yes, Democrats, finally, let the people within the party have some say rather than the system, the Deep State, the background of the Democratic party assigning who should be responsible. Let the actual delegates within the Democratic party decide whom they want to vote for based on what the masses are desiring following what I’m assuming would be some form of campaign proposals, speeches, debates, or otherwise. Now, it’s not exactly clear how this might work, and it’s also not exactly clear that this is definitely going to happen, so all of this information could be wrong. But consider this for a moment. Speaker 2: Hey, oh, can I see your phone for a sec? I just want to look up the predicted odds really quick. Speaker 1: Consider this: If we can get campaign proposals from various contenders and they can somehow compete in an open market, so to speak, we might actually have some real competition against Donald Trump. Now, I know a lot of Republicans watching right now are going to say, “Uh, no,” and turn left here. There’s no competition against Donald Trump, and that’s fine. It’s a great ticket. The Vance ticket is very, very strong, don’t get me wrong at all. I’m just saying Biden is not competition against Trump. Oh, whoa, yeah, the predicted odds right now. Who will win the 2024 Democratic nomination? Kamala Harris is up 10 cents to 61 cents, Gretchen Whitmer up 19 cents, Joe Biden down at 16 cents, Gavin Newsom at 10 cents, Josh Shapiro at 8 cents, Pete Buttigieg down at 2 cents. Michelle Obama has got more street credit here than Pete, and Michelle has already said she’s not running. This is about as crazy as my hair and my outfit today, but this is wild. Obviously, expect substantially more details. RELATED REPORT: Democratic Sources: Biden Plans To Drop Out Of Race THIS WEEKEND In the aftermath of a disastrous debate performance last month, there has been a groundswell of calls from within the Democratic Party for Joe Biden to bow out of the race. He hasn’t helped his cause with a series of flubbed lines and apparent confusion in multiple public appearances in recent weeks. Now, sources within the party are reportedly confirming that Biden is planning to drop out of the race within a few days — and he’s not expected to endorse his vice president to replace him on the ticket. According to political commentator Mark Halperin, per Newsmax: “A speech has been drafted for him. He will continue on as president. He also will not, I’m told, endorse Vice President [Kamala] Harris as his successor. They’re hoping that he will endorse an open process in which the convention will be open to Vice President Harris and a few other candidates in Chicago to pick the Democratic nominee for president.” Halperin first broke the news earlier Thursday in a post on his X account. Harris has been viewed by many political observers as a likely successor to Biden should he step down. Halperin said Harris is vetting potential running mates in advance of the party’s convention Aug. 19-22 in Chicago. Halperin told “FRONTLINE” that among possible running mates for Harris are Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear and Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro. In his post on X, he mentioned Beshear and Shapiro are among four possible running mates. Halperin shared even more details on social media: BREAKING NEWS: Multiples sources outline the apparent state of play on Biden at this time: * plans to announce withdrawal from nomination as early as this weekend, with Sunday most likely * Jon Meacham polishing up remarks * Biden with NOT resign the presidency * Biden will… https://t.co/l0LrfDTvOL — Mark Halperin (@MarkHalperin) July 18, 2024 Although Biden has insisted that he plans to run for another term, it has been impossible to ignore the evidence of his cognitive decline. In the BET interview to woo black voters, President Biden appears to forget the name of Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin. He struggles for a moment and says, “the black man.” In January, Austin did not inform the public he was hospitalized for days.pic.twitter.com/AQo04FwzR3 — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) July 18, 2024 During his BET interview, President Biden attempts to deliver his “Donald Herbert Hoover Trump” line, but can’t remember Hoover’s name. “Um, so, uh, I call, anyway, Trump is one of ‘em.” pic.twitter.com/s13CozS8Jn — Anthony LaMesa (@ajlamesa) July 18, 2024 I’m not sure people realize how BAD that George Stephanopoulos interview was for Biden. The way he answered that question- – National Security Council? – NYT had me down 10 points?– He lied 28 times?– The way the debate ran? THE MAN CANNOT KEEP A COHERENT THOUGHT! pic.twitter.com/jGFGkNEGSi — Free (@KaladinFree) July 6, 2024 #BREAKING: BIDEN’S WILD RIDE AT NAACP CONVENTION Today, at the NAACP Convention, President Biden delivered a rollercoaster of a speech. Looking visibly agitated, he mumbled and shouted, saying, “Folks, I know what a Black job is. It’s the Vice President of the United… pic.twitter.com/6gKpxwMxIZ — Genius Bot X (@GeniusBotX) July 16, 2024 And Biden, who reportedly recently tested positive for COVID-19, indicated that a medical issue could convince him to give up his re-election hopes According to The Hill: “If I had some medical condition that emerged. If doctors came to me and said, ‘You’ve got this problem, that problem,’” Biden replied. “But, I made a serious mistake in the whole debate.” The president also defended his decision to not be a transitional president and to run again, arguing that the divided country caused him to want to stay in the White House. “Look, when I originally ran … I said I was going to be a transitional candidate and I thought that I would be able to move from this and pass it on to someone else,” the incumbent said. “But I didn’t anticipate things getting so, so, so divided, and quite frankly, I think the only thing, age brings a little bit of wisdom, and I think I’ve demonstrated that. I know how to get things done for the country.” Here are some of the top Democrats who are pushing for Biden to exit the race:
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y

Watch previously unseen videos of Chris Cornell covering Tracy Chapman's Fast Car and the Rolling Stones' Wild Horses
Favicon 
www.loudersound.com

Watch previously unseen videos of Chris Cornell covering Tracy Chapman's Fast Car and the Rolling Stones' Wild Horses

Late Soundgarden singer Chris Cornell would have turned 60 on Saturday: Vicky Cornell and Nancy Wilson released videos to mark the occasion
Like
Comment
Share
INFOWARS
INFOWARS
1 y

#infowarssnl: Soros & Clintons Endorse Kamala Harris After Joe Biden Drops Out of 2024 Race — Sunday Night Live https://www.infowars.com/posts..../soros-clintons-endo

» SUPPORT: https://drjonesnaturals.com https://infowarsstore.com

Attention Required! | Cloudflare
Favicon 
www.infowars.com

Attention Required! | Cloudflare

Site has no Description
Like
Comment
Share
Front Page Mag Feed
Front Page Mag Feed
1 y

Video: Stupidity Overload – Joy Reid Argues Biden Getting COVID Is Exactly Like Trump Getting Shot
Favicon 
www.frontpagemag.com

Video: Stupidity Overload – Joy Reid Argues Biden Getting COVID Is Exactly Like Trump Getting Shot

Just when you think it couldn't get any worse for MSNBC. The post Video: Stupidity Overload – Joy Reid Argues Biden Getting COVID Is Exactly Like Trump Getting Shot appeared first on Frontpage Mag.
Like
Comment
Share
Front Page Mag Feed
Front Page Mag Feed
1 y

The Real Reason Trump Chose JD Vance
Favicon 
www.frontpagemag.com

The Real Reason Trump Chose JD Vance

He did everything right. Now the hate is crashing down. The post The Real Reason Trump Chose JD Vance appeared first on Frontpage Mag.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 68439 out of 103503
  • 68435
  • 68436
  • 68437
  • 68438
  • 68439
  • 68440
  • 68441
  • 68442
  • 68443
  • 68444
  • 68445
  • 68446
  • 68447
  • 68448
  • 68449
  • 68450
  • 68451
  • 68452
  • 68453
  • 68454
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund