Megyn Kelly Reacts to CNN's Kaitlan Collins Ignoring the Truth About Charlie Kirk Assassin's Motives

It's not that hard to remember a one-syllable name that's dominated the American news cycle for the past week -- but it is for Jerry Nadler. Nadler, the rotund, retiring Democratic congressman from Manhattan's Upper West Side, managed to mangle the surname of slain conservative organizer Charlie Kirk twice in...

Late-night comedian Jimmy Kimmel finally hit bottom Monday, when he tried painting Charlie Kirk's assassin as a MAGA conservative in an attempt to help the far-left avoid blame for his murder. During an episode of ABC's "Jimmy Kimmel Live" the host said, "We hit some new lows over the weekend,...

Top 8 Most Hated Cheap Mods on Motorcycles ??

A 74-year-old Arizona man survived three days alone in the wilderness before being found safe. His remarkable endurance shows the strength of hope and resilience.

Maybe now Ben & Jerry’s will be less woke. Ben & Jerry’s co-founder announced that he had quit the company he had founded with his friend Ben Cohen in 1978. Jerry Greenfield announced his resignation after revealing he had lost the ability to pursue the company’s independent values after Unilever acquired it. Ben & Jerry’s co-founder Jerry Greenfield has resigned after 47 years, claiming their parent company, Unilever, has silenced the brand’s political activism — which has included speaking out in support of Gaza and human rights. pic.twitter.com/5JrR6qpltQ — Pop Base (@PopBase) September 17, 2025 CBS News reported more on the co-founder’s decision to step down: The co-founder of Ben & Jerry’s has resigned from the ice cream brand after saying his company, known for its social activism, has lost “the independence to pursue our values” under the ownership of British giant Unilever. Jerry Greenfield’s announcement follows the company’s failure in 2022 to block Unilever from selling its ice cream in West Bank settlements, which Ben & Jerry’s said would run counter to its values. Greenfield said he could “no longer, in good conscience, and after 47 years, remain an employee” of the Vermont-based company, according to a statement published on X by co-founder Ben Cohen late Tuesday. The brand was founded by the two school friends in 1978 and acquired by Unilever in 2000. It is now owned by the Magnum Ice Cream Company, a Unilever subsidiary. Greenfield said his company “has been silenced, sidelined for fear of upsetting those in power” at a time when the current U.S. administration is “attacking civil rights, voting rights, the rights of immigrants, women and the LGBTQ community.” “It’s profoundly disappointing to come to the conclusion that that independence, the very basis of our sale to Unilever, is gone,” he added. After 47 years, Jerry has made the difficult decision to step down from the company we built together. I’m sharing his words as he resigns from Ben & Jerry’s. His legacy deserves to be true to our values, not silenced by @MagnumGlobal #FreeBenAndJerrys pic.twitter.com/EZXGRjs76a — Ben Cohen (@YoBenCohen) September 17, 2025 Reuters reported in recent months that the ice cream brand has been vocal against President Trump’s immigration policies: Ben & Jerry’s has in recent months been a lonely voice among well-known brands speaking out on issues like Gaza and President Donald Trump’s immigration stance, while other U.S. companies back away from diversity pledges, and their executives largely refrain from commenting on the White House’s policies. Last month, Microsoft fired four workers for protests over the company’s ties to Israel, including two who briefly occupied the company president’s office. Ben & Jerry’s independent social mission board, which Greenfield and Cohen do not sit on, has led the activism. The sale of Ben & Jerry’s to Unilever in 2000 allowed the brand to maintain the board, with authority over the social mission but not business operations. A spokesperson for Unilever and its Magnum Ice Cream Co said that it “disagrees with Greenfield’s perspective and has sought to engage both co-founders in a constructive conversation on how to strengthen Ben & Jerry’s powerful values-based position in the world.” Unilever shares were unmoved on Wednesday.

A sharp-eyed Air Traffic Controller may have just averted another national catastrophe in the making. Shortly after departing DC, the President’s plane headed northeast over New York last night. President Trump, Melania, and a full entourage were heading across the pond for an official state visit to Great Britain. There were reportedly no planes within at least 8 miles Air Force One as they soared along at 32,000 feet; normal cruising altitude. Not surprisingly, 8 miles is a little too close for comfort when it comes to keeping planes away from Air Force One. But the momentary 8-mile gap wasn’t the problem.  The Spirit Airlines plane flying 8 miles out wasn’t just too close for comfort. It was flying at an identical altitude on a trajectory that would potentially cross paths with the President’s plane, putting them on a possible collision course. Apparently, the pilot of the Spirit Airlines plane wasn’t in a talkative mood, because the Air Traffic Controller had to repeatedly warn the pilot to make course corrections before getting a response back. Have a listen to the audio captured between the Air Traffic Controller and the Spirit Airlines pilot. You can hear the Controller getting more and more frustrated with the pilot’s lack of response: AIR FORCE ONE and Spirit Airlines flt NK1300 got too close over Long Island, New York for Air Traffic Control and get’s yelled at including getting told “GET OFF THE IPAD”! Tip via @xJonNYC Audio via @liveatc & Tracking via @ADSBex pic.twitter.com/sLJ0rip8sG — Thenewarea51 (@thenewarea51) September 17, 2025 The obvious thing that stands out is the professionalism of the Air Force One pilot responding to the Air Traffic Controller. Particularly compared to the lackadaisical — almost non-existent response — of the Spirit Airlines pilot. Just the fact that the pilot needed to be told to “PAY ATTENTION” is frightening. Though the planes were positioned 8 miles apart during the incident, the flight paths would have potentially converged within a few miles as reported by The Daily Mail: Air Force One was involved in mid-air drama with a passenger jet as it ferried US President Donald Trump to Britain on Tuesday, according to reports. An air traffic controller was forced to intervene when he noticed the path of a Spirit Airlines jet converging with the president’s plane over Long Island, CBS and Bloomberg reported today. Spirit Flight 1300 was travelling from Fort Lauderdale to Boston when the quick-thinking ATC reportedly noticed their altitudes were similar and paths aligned over New York. Preliminary data from Flight Radar suggests the closest the two jets came on converging paths was around 11 miles. Donald Trump safely touched down in London late on Tuesday for an historic second state visit. A spokesperson for the airline told the Daily Mail today: ‘Spirit Airlines flight 1300 (FLL-BOS) followed procedures and Air Traffic Control (ATC) instructions while en route to Boston (BOS) and landed uneventfully at BOS. ‘Safety is always our top priority.’ That report makes it sound as if the planes were never close enough to actually warrant any danger. I have seen multiple reports from the mainstream media that have painted this incident as stemming from an abundance of caution by the Controller — maybe even an unwarranted amount of caution. This CBS news report, for example, amplified the fact that the planes did not collide, and both made it to their destinations safely: But as I dug deeper into this story, I kept seeing two different distances mentioned. Was it 8 miles, or 11 miles? And is that far enough apart in either case? But that’s when I first realized that although the planes were a full 8 miles apart at the time of this interaction… Their paths would have indeed crossed, if something hadn’t changed. Just imagining that possible scenario is almost too dark to think about right now. Check out more details of the flight paths from this report by The Hill: Air traffic control (ATC) operators admonished a Spirit Airlines pilot Tuesday for flying too close to Air Force One, President Trump’s official plane. The communication with ATC occurred while the two planes were flying over Long Island, N.Y. According to flight tracking site Flightradar24, the two planes were flying parallel to each other 8 miles apart, and were on paths on which they could have converged 11 miles apart, as reported by CBS News. President Trump, along with first lady Melania Trump, were flying from Joint Base Andrews in Prince George’s County, Maryland, to London. They arrived in the UK on Tuesday evening. The president is meeting with King Charles III and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Wednesday. (Emphasis added.) According to that report from The Hill reporting the information taken from the flight tracker data, their paths would have potentially crossed — as I stated. But even then, the point at which their paths would have crossed would have put each plane in that same location 11 miles apart. Meaning that one plane would have crossed the path of the other… and the second plane would have crossed the same point in the air afterwards, with the first plane now 11 miles past that point. So there really was no danger — right? I have flown enough to know that things change often at 23,000 feet and at speeds that are hard to imagine. We’re so used to gauging ground speed that our brains have a hard time truly grasping how fast a plane is flying. Particularly along the coast, there are all sorts of reasons why a plane might need to slow down, speed up, divert from a course… and then later come back in line with that same course. Any of which could have altered that 11-mile distance very easily. Remember — both of these planes were flying at approximately 500 knots; in excess of 500 miles per hour. A lot can change fast at those speeds. It’s easy to say there was no danger now, with both planes having landed and the news cycle having moved on — as it does so fast and furiously. After all, here’s an awesome view capturing the moment when Air Force One landed in Great Britain early this morning: But I have to ask the question: What would have been the result had that Air Traffic Controller considered the improbability of those paths aligning perfectly, and dismissed the danger altogether? Is that really a risk worth taking? Or… is the fact that the President of the United States was flying onboard a plane that had the potential of crossing paths with another plane just a few miles down the road enough to ruffle some feathers? Personally, I would prefer the other pilots “Get off the iPad!” and pay more attention; just as they were told to do midair! What about you — did that Air Traffic Controller go overboard, or did he show the right amount of zeal for the moment? What do you think?

Let’s hope it turns out to be nothing. Authorities in Arizona have reported that a bomb squad has been deployed outside the Turning Point USA headquarters after a suspicious item was reported to the police. The suspicious item was reportedly a bag, but the contents of the bag have yet to be revealed. Here’s the police response to the scene: BREAKING: Bomb squad is responding to a suspicious “bag” reportedly left outside Turning Point USA headquarters in Phoenix, Arizona. pic.twitter.com/gFBuvmGeKc — Human Events Daily (@humaneventslive) September 17, 2025 Fox 10 Phoenix had more details to report on the suspicious item: Police say a bomb squad was called in on Wednesday to the Turning Point USA headquarters in Phoenix after a suspicious bag was found. The bag was found on Sept. 17 outside the headquarters, located near 48th Street and Baseline Road. The Phoenix Police Department said a bomb squad responded to investigate, and the area was cleared out of an abundance of caution. Just after 9:30 a.m., police said the bag was deemed safe and restrictions in the area would be lifted. Police did not say what was inside the bag or if anyone was taken into custody. Turning Point USA headquarters has been under heightened security, as hundreds of people visit the growing memorial for the company’s co-founder, Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated in Utah on Sept. 10. Take a look: BREAKING: Bomb squad is responding to a suspicious “bag” reportedly left outside Turning Point USA headquarters in Phoenix, Arizona. pic.twitter.com/TjhbbKmbs7 — Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) September 17, 2025 BREAKING: Phoenix PD BOMB SQUAD is responding to a report of a suspicious package outside Turning Point’s headquarters, where a large memorial for Charlie Kirk is set up We shouldn’t have to live like this! Keep praying for the guys and gals at TPUSA pic.twitter.com/y0MrGKU9oe — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) September 17, 2025 This is a developing story…

The mother of the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk has revealed details about her son. In a statement to authorities, the mother of Tyler Robinson has shared that her son spent the last year being more political and began to support pro-trans rights issues. She also shared that Tyler and his father, a Trump supporter, argued over their political views. Fox News provided the following details about Robinson’s mother’s remarks: Tyler Robinson’s mother told investigators she had watched her son change dramatically in the year leading up to the Utah college shooting of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. Once a college scholarship recipient with a promising future, Robinson had “become more political,” leaning left and supporting “pro-gay and trans rights,” his mother said, according to court documents. She also recounted heated arguments between Robinson and his father, who held sharply different views and regularly sparred over their competing ideologies. At one point, she told police, her son dismissed Kirk’s Utah Valley University (UVU) event as a “stupid” venue and claimed Kirk “spreads too much hate.” JUST IN: Tyler Robinson’s mother expressed concern that her son had become left-leaning, pro-gay, and pro-trans in the last year. Utah County DA Jeff Gray also confirmed the etched inscriptions on the bullet casings. “Robinson’s mother expressed concern to her husband that the… pic.twitter.com/4JZEN9dzmB — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 16, 2025 Tyler Robinson’s mom, Amber Jones Robinson, quickly erased photos on her Facebook. pic.twitter.com/sUrBzJ0vTh — Alison Wattles (@AlisonWattles) September 12, 2025 People reported it was Robinson’s mother who first recognized him in the FBI’s photos released to the public: Gray shared further details of the investigation at the briefing, claiming that before Robinson’s father helped turn him in, it was his mother who had the initial suspicion that the person wanted for Kirk’s shooting was Robinson. On Sept. 11, Robinson’s mother, who was not publicly named, saw photos released of the suspect and thought it might be her son, Gray said at Tuesday’s press briefing. When she called Robinson to check on him, he allegedly said he was at home sick, and had been at home sick the previous day as well. The mother then told Robinson’s father that she was concerned the suspect looked like Robinson, and his father agreed, per Gray. Robinson’s mother told investigators that over the past year, he had grown increasingly more political, with his views at odds with those of his family members, especially his father. Robinson had made statements that his father was a “pretty die hard MAGA” since President Donald Trump was elected to office, Gray said. Gray also read out text exchanges between Robinson and his roommate, who is not charged in connection with the shooting. Asked why he murdered the right-wing activist, Robinson allegedly replied “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out.” Robinson allegedly told his roommate that he had planned the shooting for “a bit over a week.”