Knew It: The Real Problem? POTATUS Is Just Too Gosh Darn Energetic for His Own Geriatric Good

Doxing Democrats Over Israel

Training and taming wild horses demands patience and a meticulous approach. Transitioning a wild horse to a point where it’s prepared for a beginner rider necessitates several months‚ potentially stretching up to a year. Comparatively‚ domesticated horses accustomed to human interaction may require a shorter taming period. However‚ it’s crucial to acknowledge the potential risks... The post Horse with a rocky past gives a heartfelt ‘goodbye’ to the only man he ever trusted appeared first on Animal Channel.

In a lively fish shop‚ where the aroma of the ocean fills the air and customers bustle in and out‚ a unique visitor captures everyone’s attention. This isn’t just any customer‚ but a curious cat named Sushi‚ who has a peculiar habit of trading leaves for fish. This heartwarming story of a cat and a... The post Hungry stray cat approaches fish shop owner and tries to make a purchase appeared first on Animal Channel.

If someone who was once considered “heir apparent to run the Times” declares that his former paper has become an intolerant “illiberal” hellhole‚ you should listen. The latter part of former New York Times opinion editor James Bennet’s 17‚000-word autopsy of his former employer sharpened the focus on the suffocating liberalism of the media world in general and the Times --and its closed-minded liberal readership -- in particular. (Read our take on the first part here.) Bennet conveyed more conservative arguments in a single paragraph than Times reporters have done over the last four years: ….The Times was slow to break it to its readers that there was less to Trump’s ties to Russia than they were hoping‚ and more to Hunter Biden’s laptop‚ that Trump might be right that covid came from a Chinese lab‚ that masks were not always effective against the virus‚ that shutting down schools for many months was a bad idea. In my experience‚ reporters overwhelmingly support Democratic policies and candidates. They are generally also motivated by a desire for a more just world. Neither of those tendencies are new. But there has been a sea change over the past ten years in how journalists think about pursuing justice…. Illiberal journalists have a different philosophy‚ and they have their reasons for it. They are more concerned with group rights than individual rights‚ which they regard as a bulwark for the privileges of white men. They have seen the principle of free speech used to protect right-wing outfits like Project Veritas and Breitbart News and are uneasy with it….. This observation also rang true: ….The newsroom’s embrace of opinion journalism has compromised the Times’s independence‚ misled its readers and fostered a culture of intolerance and conformity. In Bennet’s view‚ the Times allowed itself to be warped by smarmy Internet youth culture. This creep of politics into the newsroom’s journalism helped the Times beat back some of its new challengers‚ at least those on the left. Competitors like Vox and the HuffPost were blending leftish politics with reporting and writing it up conversationally in the first person…. But Bennet may have really struck a sore spot when he brought up the paper’s hallowed (later discredited) “1619 Project‚” arguing that America was founded on slavery. ….like Cotton’s piece‚ the 1619 Project was presented in a way the Times later judged to be too provocative. The Times declared that the 1619 Project “aims to reframe the country’s history‚ understanding 1619 as our true founding”. That bold statement -- a declaration of Times fact‚ not opinion‚ since it came from the newsroom -- outraged many Americans who venerated 1776 as the founding. The Times later stealthily erased it from the digital version of the project‚ but was caught doing so by a writer for the publication Quillette…. If the 1619 Project and the Cotton op-ed shared the same supposed flaws and excited similar outrage‚ how come that one is lauded as a landmark success and the other is a sackable offence? You know you're in novel territory when a former Times editor is quoting then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell approvingly (and pungently): As Mitch McConnell‚ then the majority leader‚ said on the Senate floor about the Times’s panic over the Cotton op-ed‚ listing some other debatable op-ed choices‚ “Vladimir Putin? No problem. Iranian propaganda? Sure. But nothing‚ nothing could have prepared them for 800 words from the junior senator from Arkansas.”…. Bennet found some recent encouraging signs‚ such as the paper’s newly questioning coverage of “medical protocols for trans children.” But he doesn’t think the paper can regain its credibility until the staff truly embraces tolerance of opposing views. Would the rising woke generation at the Times ever relinquish its vise grip over a discredited but still influential media outlet? 

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow might as well have been standing in front of a corkboard with newspaper clippings and red twine during Monday’s edition of her eponymous show. The ranting Maddow opened her once-a-week show with an over 25-minute screed where she stitched together a bizarre argument that tied the recent increase in anti-Semitism in the U.S. to the Ku Klux Klan (not the pro-Hamas crowd)‚ to an anti-Semitic Army general in 1939‚ and ultimately to former President Trump’s recent campaign rhetoric. Maddow started the show fairly measured as she rightfully decried the recent surge in anti-Semitic incidents across the country ranging from vandalism of synagogues to a rash of bomb threats against them. But things took a turn when‚ instead of blaming the October 7 terrorist attack and the extremists supporting Hamas‚ she seemed to link them to white supremacists: They know what to do at Beth Israel in Jackson. They've had to do this before. In 1967‚ which was just four years after a Klansman murdered Medgar Evers in his driveway‚ in Jackson‚ in 1967 the Klan also bombed the Beth Israel synagogue in Jackson‚ the very same synagogue that was evacuated for the bomb threats this weekend. Beth Israel in Jackson was bombed by the Klan in 1967‚ the rabbi of that congregation had his house bombed that year too. She even suggested the bomb threats represented the political “climate right now in the United States of America. This too is what it's like in our country right now.” “How does this kind of terroristic menace work? What does it accomplish? Why is this a political tactic?” she rhetorically asked before answering.     Her answer involved the 1939 congressional testimony of then-former Deputy Chief of Staff of the Army General George Van Horn Moseley. In his testimony‚ Moseley praised Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany and called for an American eugenics program to sterilize Jews (Click “expand”): Well‚ General Moseley told the Congress in 1939‚ “The first thing I would do if I was in the White House‚ gentlemen‚ I would issue an order immediately discharging every communist now in the government of the United States. He told Congress‚ quote‚ “I believe in watching our breed in America very carefully.” He told Congress that Hitler and Germany had‚ quote‚ “solved the racial problem.” By 1939‚ General Moseley was publicly advocating and speaking toward – publicly advocating for the sterilization of all Jewish immigrants in America. This man had been deputy chief of staff of the United States Army. “General Moseley had put himself forward to the leading fascist groups in America as a potential military dictator for the United States‚ which is what they were working for and which is what he thought we needed in this country‚” she added. You can see where this is going. Giving a synopsis of how Moseley was able to have those beliefs and spread them to others (and seemingly suggesting they were incredibly popular)‚ Maddow opined‚ “If you get people exercised enough about the threat‚ if you use just the right words‚ you get them exercised enough about the threat…they're liable to do things they would never otherwise agree to.” That sounds like the rhetoric used by the liberal media and Democrats for the last seven years‚ claiming the GOP was bringing back Jim Crow and installing a dictator. It sounds like the kind of rhetoric that would lead leftist extremists to try assassinating U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh‚ attempting to assassinate Congressman Lee Zeldin (R-NY)‚ and shooting up the Republican baseball practice like one of Maddow’s fans did. But no‚ it reminded her of Trump. “But we are having this weird moment in American news and politics right now where half the country is shouting about how the Republican presidential nominee keeps quoting those dictators. He keeps saying the kinds of things‚ the exact kind of things that Hitler and Mussolini said as they ascended to and consolidated power‚” she said. She proclaimed‚ “He doesn't mind being compared to those people” and proceeded to suggest Republicans were hungry for all those terrible things. Who’s the one trying to stoke fear? The transcript is below. CLick "expand" to read: MSNBC’s The Rachel Maddow Show December 18‚ 2023 9:08:12 p.m. Eastern (…) RACHEL MADDOW: That same day‚ that same synagogue in D.C. Got a bomb threat. Like all these other synagogues all across the country. And‚ yes‚ in Mississippi after the threats to the four different airports and to the northern Mississippi synagogues on Thursday‚ on Sunday the bomb threat was to the largest synagogue in the whole state‚ Beth Israel Congregation in Jackson. They had emergency responders on site all day‚ all services and programs canceled. They know what to do at Beth Israel in Jackson. They've had to do this before. In 1967‚ which was just four years after a Klansman murdered Medgar Evers in his driveway‚ in Jackson‚ in 1967 the Klan also bombed the Beth Israel synagogue in Jackson‚ the very same synagogue that was evacuated for the bomb threats this weekend. Beth Israel in Jackson was bombed by the Klan in 1967‚ the rabbi of that congregation had his house bombed that year too. And‚ you know‚ yesterday it all comes back‚ evacuated again. Bomb threats. Across the country there were hundreds of them. This too is part of the climate right now in the United States of America. This too is what it's like in our country right now. (…) 9:10:39 p.m. Eastern How does this kind of terroristic menace work? What does it accomplish? Why is this a political tactic? Sometimes it's easier to see in other time periods or in other time places than it is to see in our own. So‚ consider this‚ it is from our country but it's from a long time ago‚ 1939. 1939‚ a congressional committee took testimony‚ very high-profile testimony‚ got a lot of attention at the time. They took testimony from one of the most famous Army generals in the United States‚ his name was General George Van Horn Moseley. Until not long before this committee testimony‚ General George Van Horn Moseley had been the deputy chief of staff of the U.S. Army; some very very very senior person in the United States military. Deputy chief of staff of the Army. He goes before the Congress and he testifies in 1939 that he believed there were more than 6 million communists in the United States of America and more than 90 percent of them had to be Jews. By then‚ General Moseley had put himself forward to the leading fascist groups in America as a potential military dictator for the United States‚ which is what they were working for and which is what he thought we needed in this country. And why would we need a dictator instead of our democracy? Well‚ General Moseley told the Congress in 1939‚ “The first thing I would do if I was in the White House‚ gentlemen‚ I would issue an order immediately discharging every communist now in the government of the United States. He told congress‚ quote‚ “I believe in watching our breed in America very carefully.” He told Congress that Hitler and Germany had‚ quote‚ “solved the racial problem.” By 1939‚ General Moseley was publicly advocating and speaking toward – publicly advocating for the sterilization of all Jewish immigrants in America. This man had been deputy chief of staff of the United States army. (…) 9:15:01 p.m. Eastern If there's some kind of‚ you know‚ existential threat that not only lurks in the world‚ but it's coming from here at home‚ coming from within somehow‚ well‚ you would do almost anything to stop it‚ right? You would agree to things you’d agree to do things you’d never otherwise agree to because it’s an emergency. If you get people exercised enough about the threat‚ if you use just the right words‚ you get them exercised enough about the threat and who’s to blame for the threat; and frankly‚ who’s to blame for everything‚ it doesn't have to be rational‚ you just get people emotionally exercised enough about it‚ get people afraid enough about it and they're liable to do things they would never otherwise agree to. (…) 9:16:28 p.m. Eastern That rhetoric‚ that propaganda‚ that language‚ that political tactic didn't just work in the countries that turned into dictatorships in the 1930s‚ that political tactic worked on a lot of Americans here just as well as it worked abroad. Because it's an effective political tactic. And‚ you know‚ nobody is a Nazi but a Nazi‚ nobody is Hitler but Hitler. Nobody is Mussolini but Mussolini. Right? There is no point in making and there’s no cause to make any sort of modern analogy to the fascist dictatorships of the 1930s. But we are having this weird moment in American news and politics right now where half the country is shouting about how the Republican presidential nominee keeps quoting those dictators. He keeps saying the kinds of things‚ the exact kind of things that Hitler and Mussolini said as they ascended to and consolidated power. And you see the names of those dictators and you see the discussion of that period in history all over the news right now because he is saying those things. He is effectively quoting Mussolini and Hitler in some of their most effective propaganda shtick tactics. But pointing out he's saying Hitleresque and Mussoliniesque things turns out to not be enough to make him stop saying those things. He doesn't mind being compared to those people. (…)

Christmas might be a time to focus on images of "Madonna and Child‚" but Bill Donohue of the Catholic League is once again calling out the aging pop tart's tawdry old pranks on the stage of her latest "Celebration Tour." He called it "Madonna in Free Fall." Joe Kinsey at outkick.com‚ explained he had an "undisclosed source" taking pictures as " the 65-year-old Material Girl was back at it Saturday night in Brooklyn at the Barclays Center where the Boomer was getting after it with one of her dancers." The source acquired "footage of Madonna enjoying herself to prove that the old girl is not only still alive and kicking‚ it also seems as if her lesbian sex drive is still as strong as ever." The singer needed to pad her wealth due to Biden-flation: “Madonna still has to pay bills and if suburbanites are willing to pay her to go have simulated sex with one of her dancers six months after she nearly died [she spent days in the ICU following a serious bacterial infection]‚ then get after it girlfriend.”  No Generation X grandmother should be taking the grade-school grandkids to this concert! Another media source‚ mamamia.com‚ put it this way: “Don’t be alarmed‚ but right now there’s a 65-year-old woman simulating masturbation on stage in front of 20‚000 people. Not only that. She’s getting lap dances from all comers. She’s being touched and rubbed and pulled and groped‚ tied up‚ even. A man in a jockstrap‚ bottom exposed‚ is pretending to perform oral sex on her.” Here’s the clincher. “Oh‚ and her children are watching. Participating‚ sometimes. Some of them are adults‚ some of them are kids. It’s a family show that is very definitely not a family show.” As the Daily Mail noted‚ “The singer‚ 65‚ shared a kiss with a topless dancer while donning satin lingerie‚ before she was joined onstage by her daughter Estere‚ 11‚ once again.” Madonna's on-stage pranks are never-ending. She even put herself on a glittering cross in Rome to attract condemnation from the Vatican. 

For his final episode of the year‚ milquetoast comedian John Oliver took a moment to shill for the dystopian social media censors exposed by The Twitter Files during a 27-minute-long monologue of smearing X owner Elon Musk. Oliver engaged in fear-mongering about Musk’s management of X (formerly Twitter) after referring to Musk as a “less f*ckable reimagining of Billy Zane’s character from the Titanic” during the Dec. 17 edition of Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. The leftist comedian went out of his way to minimize the actions of the censorship regime that preceded Musk’s purchase of X‚ insisting that they were merely “struggling with the impossible job of content moderation” rather than conspiring to censor conservatives.  In the same monologue‚ Oliver whined about the dissolution of Twitter’s infamous “Trust and Safety” council‚ while ignoring the suspension of accounts such as The Babylon Bee for acknowledging biological reality and scathing scandals like the suppression of the New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop scandal. Instead‚ Oliver suggested that the authors of these authoritarian decisions had been too lenient and panned The Twitter Files that exposed them.  Oliver’s claims came after Musk pledged to make X a free speech platform. Oliver said that Musk “released The Twitter Files‚ in which he basically mistook the emails of various feckless left-leaning tech weenies struggling with the impossible job of content moderation for a vast elite conspiracy to silence right-wing dipsh*ts.”  Oliver did not mention most prominent accounts censored before Musk bought the platform but resigned himself to attacking Musk for restoring podcast host Alex Jones and “white supremacists” to the platform. Since Oliver insisted that there was no conspiracy to silence conservatives‚ he completely ignored the censorship of biological reality before Elon Musk changed the platform’s rules to allow “deadnaming” and “misgendering.” Nevertheless‚ Oliver ranted that a “transphobic documentary” — What Is a Woman? — was promoted by Musk on the platform.  Earlier in Oliver’s obsessive monologue‚ he mocked Musk for the outfits he wears to events‚ calling Musk a “less f***able reimagining of Billy Zane’s character from the Titanic.”  NewsBusters Executive Editor Tim Graham delivered a broadside against Oliver for this attack: “John Oliver is just gross. "F---able" is vulgar and dehumanizing‚ and if he thinks he fits that word‚ he's delusional.” John Oliver is just gross. "F---able" is vulgar and dehumanizing‚ and if he thinks he fits that word‚ he's delusional. https://t.co/hGmk3Iyi7L — Tim Graham (@TimJGraham) December 18‚ 2023 Conservatives are under attack! Contact Twitter at (415) 222-9670 and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency‚ clarity on so-called hate speech and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored‚ contact us at the Media Research Center contact form‚ and help us hold Big Tech accountable.  

This Pecan Praline Recipe is easy to make and a wonderful dessert. Add these to any occasion for a real treat! They melt in your mouth! If you love old-fashioned recipes‚ you will love these Kentucky Bourbon Balls. They are always a hit‚ and if you are not a bourbon fan… no worries‚ we share...

A mentally unstable woman in the U.K. reportedly stabbed a stranger walking his dog in a park earlier this month. The woman had escaped from a number of mental health units leading up to the attack. The Daily Mail reported that artist Emma Borowy‚ 32‚ was apparently a schizophrenic who happened to be obsessed with elements of witchcraft. Borowy had previously been arrested for slaughtering two goats as part of a "sacrifice" ritual.Borowy had also threatened to "stab someone in the heart" just three weeks before fatally stabbing Roger Leadbeater‚ a 74-year-old man. Leadbeater apparently died of multiple stab wounds‚ and the report noted that it is believed the attack was random. At the time of the attack‚ Borowy was apparently under the care of the Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust.However‚ the case will not be going to trial‚ as the woman is suspected of killing herself in New Hall Prison‚ located in Wakefield‚ West Yorkshire‚ according to The Star.Prior to her apparent suicide‚ Borowy was in the process of being evaluated concerning her fitness to stand trial in the case. Judge Jeremy Richardson noted that Borowy was set to be transferred to a hospital focused on the care of those with mental health issues.Borowy's father‚ Karl‚ said his daughter had been admitted into mental health units in Warrington‚ Salford‚ and Bolton‚ but she managed to walk out of them without difficulty."It seems she can escape any time she wants‚" he said. "That's what she told my wife. I do think these units should be more secure. She must have escaped a dozen times in the past two years."Karl noted that his daughter had been welcomed back home three months ago but that she was unable to "cope." He went on to say that she also had a drug problem.Borowy's father commented on the apparent killing of Leadbeater and said "We knew she was very‚ very unwell‚ but this is a new dimension.""I think perhaps mental health services are struggling and dealing with too many people. The counselor she had seemed to change every few months. I don't think Emma was taking her medication properly when she was out either."The authorities said they were told that Borowy had not been seen at home in three months leading up to the killing of Leadbeater. One neighbor said that Borowy had an "interest in witchcraft‚" including the making of "voodoo dolls."She had also slaughtered two goats as part of a "ritual" killing. The animals were later found with broken bones and their throats cut. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!